Re: Fire at Bridges club
Posted by:
WILLow777
()
Date: November 02, 2010 10:00AM
Todd Willingham - Executed for an Accidental Fire
Strapped to a gurney in Texas' death chamber in February, 2004, just moments from his execution for setting a fire that killed his three daughters, Cameron Todd Willingham declared his innocence one last time. " I am an innocent man, convicted of a crime I did not commit," Willingham said angrily. "I have been persecuted for 12 years for something I did not do." Four fire cause and origin experts -- Gerald Hurst, John Lentini, John DeHaan and Kendall Ryland -- agree. "There's nothing to suggest to any reasonable arson investigator that this was an arson fire," said Hurst, a Cambridge University-educated chemist who has investigated scores of fires in his career. "It was just a fire."
Curtis Severns
Curtis Severns has been in federal prison since 2006. Convicted of intentionally starting the fire in his gun shop, he has 25 more years on his sentence. Severns has maintained his innocence all along. As in many arson cases, he was convicted almost exclusively by the testimony of fire investigators who relied on assumptions that some of the leading arson experts in the country now say are false. In fact, new evidence and a Texas Observer investigation reveal that Severns remains in federal prison in Beaumont for a crime he didn’t commit.
Toledo, Ohio Area Restaurateur Acquitted of Arson
Former restaurant owner Charles Bryan, Jr. was charged with arson and insurance fraud for a fire that destroyed his and 7 other businesses in Wauseon, Ohio in 2007. The charges were based not on science, not on physical evidence, but on nothing more than speculation that he might financially gain from the fire. Judge Charles Wittenberg ruled that the state failed to prove that Mr. Bryan had financial problems. (Of course, the cost of defending himself has probably bankrupted him.)
Rose Kate Roseborough
On April 23, 2003, Rose was sleeping on the sofa in her living room in Ashland, Ohio when she awoke to find a fire on the home's second floor. She tried to rescue her 11-month-old twin daughters, Lucie and Julia, but was driven back by the heavy smoke. The children died of smoke inhalation. Rose was charged with arson and 2 counts of murder, and the death penalty was sought. The key evidence offered at trial was the "expert" testimony of EMT Kevin Rosser, who claimed that he noticed "large particle soot" on Rose's face at the fire scene. Holding himself out as a fire expert, Rosser opined that such soot is only produced in the early stages of a fire, meaning Rose set the fire herself. The presiding judge refused to conduct a Daubert hearing on the scientific validity of EMT Rosser's testimony. Rose was convicted and sentenced to life without parole. Fortunately, Judge James D. Sweeney recognized junk science proffered by an unqualified witness. On April 23, 2010, the Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed Judge Sweeney's reversal of Kate's conviction.
Bret Shallenberger
It took a Fayette County, PA jury just 25 minutes to figure out Bret Shallenberger was innocent of hiring a former employee to burn down Shallenberger's profitable business. It's the local prosecutor, who promised the actual arsonist immunity in exchange for framing Shallenberger, who should be on trial.
Michael Espalin
On a warm August night in 2004, Michael Espalin and his dog watched Riverside, CA firefighters douse seven burning palm trees on a residential street. It was 1 a.m., an unusual time to be walking a dog, or so thought an arson investigator. After answering a number of questions, Espalin, then 31, was asked to rub his face and hands on a gauze pad and sent on his way. Half a year later, Espalin was charged as a serial arsonist, accused of lighting 21 fires, mostly trees and bushes, in Riverside. No eyewitnesses or traditional evidence linked Espalin to the crimes. But the Riverside County district attorney's office built a case against him based on a bloodhound allegedly picking up his scent on a charred incendiary device and cold crime scenes and matching it to the pad. After Espalin spent two years in jail awaiting trial, a jury deadlocked 9 to 3 in January for acquittal. Most jurors did not believe that the bloodhound, Dakota, found Espalin's scent at the scene of the fires days and weeks after they were set. Prosecutors say they intend to try Espalin a second time. Michael Espalin was retried in 2007 and he was found not guilty. Unable to post $500,000 bail, Michael spent 2 years in jail pre-trial. He has sued Riverside Fire Department officials and the dog handler. California municipalities have already paid out over $2.3 million to settle other wrongful arrest/conviction lawsuits.
Amanda Hypes
In April 2002, a Rapides Parish, Louisiana grand jury indicted Amanda Hypes on charges of arson and murder in relation to a house fire that took the lives of her three children. The charges were based on a California fire expert's findings—an analysis conducted more than a year after the blaze was extinguished and the house was razed. Prosecutors said they would demand the death penalty. Hypes remained in jail for more than four years awaiting trial until June, 2006, when a judge dismissed the indictment and ordered her released. He ruled that the initial arson finding by Louisiana authorities was based "merely on an old wives' tale" and that "every shred of evidence to prove or disprove a possible crime was destroyed and placed in a pile."
Lisa Greene
An arson expert hired by Lisa Greene's defense team says the Midland, NC mother did not set the Jan. 10, 2006 house fire that killed her two children. In interviews with the Charlotte Observer, John Lentini, a private fire investigator in Marietta, Ga., said a lit candle in the children's bedroom started the fire. Lentini -- a national advocate of using research-based scientific methods to investigate fires -- said local and state investigators are relying on outdated techniques to determine where the fire started and how it spread. Lisa Greene was found guilty of murder and arson. She was sentenced to life in prison.
Sandra Kemper
Sandra Kemper, a suspect in an alleged arson that took the life of her son, denied nine times that she had anything to do with the fire. Then the St. Louis County police detective resorted to one of the oldest tricks in the book -- he told Kemper that she had failed a lie detector test. Later that day, Kemper admitted that she set the fire to get out from under the burden of being the sole provider to her family and to collect insurance proceeds. But the confession did not fit the facts of the crime, the motive evidence was weak, and Sandra had passed the lie detector test with flying colors. The trial judge declared a mistrial on issues related to the polygraph, and Missouri's high court has now ruled that Sandra cannot be retried.
truthinjustice.org/arson.htm