Just a simple question. If all education is free how will it be funded. I can't figuer it out who will pay for all the student loans and then pay for college for the kids going now. Can someone in a few words tell me how that will work?

If you believe this, I have a bridge........

With free education, how would Harvard afford my $435,000 annual salary?

Libs are fucking stupid. That's how.

Economist Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Just a simple question. If all education is free
> how will it be funded. I can't figuer it out who
> will pay for all the student loans and then pay
> for college for the kids going now. Can someone
> in a few words tell me how that will work?


.......Education costs nothing, it pays and pays and pays. Lack of education is what costs.

But who is going to pay the people to teach?

She intends to invade several countries, make them colonies and milk them dry. She has her eye on Venezuela.

The money will be created out of thin air

It only applies to instate public schools. It sounds like states would have to share the cost burden of the plan if they chose to participate. Out-of-state tuition would probably have to rise to compensate.

By taxing the white man even more.

But there are still all the extra cost such as maintaining buildings, paying the support workers. Even the utilities. I just figure out how it can be free.

Offer a Unlawful ex Order, or any unobtainable freebie. The smart people know its not going to come true as theres not enough money, the stupid will think there going to get a freebie, so they will be pissed at the GOP when they find out it will not happen. Divide the people. The newest tactic of the left.

Expect several years of this if Hillary is elected until she's impeached. It will happen, she will screw something up royal, she will cover it up, then lie and lie and get caught. With another Democrat in the Oval Office don't look for much "Hope" or Change".

If Trump is elected expect jobs to improve, expect fewer people on welfare, expect the debt going down , expect good changes to Obamacare, and maybe some day unless Democrats can get back into the White House there will be enough money to do at least 2 years of free college for everyone.

DAJAX

It gets harder to get into instate schools.

She's promised a number of tax increases, while Trump has proposed number of the old boilerplate Republican tax cuts (some for the corporate tax dodgers who've moved their HQs offshore). On the other hand, her top aide has also promised another war. This will be an interesting election since the sets of war profiteers and tax cutters usually intersect.

Economist Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Just a simple question. If all education is free
> how will it be funded. I can't figuer it out who
> will pay for all the student loans and then pay
> for college for the kids going now. Can someone
> in a few words tell me how that will work?


It is easy when you use Progressive mathematics. They will pay for a $35,000 college education (tuition only) by raising your taxes $1000 or so per year for the remainder of your life and if you make over $135K per year you are shit out of luck because you do not get the tuition benefit and you pay the tax.

Another empty campaign slogan. It will never happen. How gullible she thinks people are. She is lying again to gain a few votes.

Economist Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Just a simple question. If all education is free
> how will it be funded. I can't figuer it out who
> will pay for all the student loans and then pay
> for college for the kids going now. Can someone
> in a few words tell me how that will work?

If you actually were an ECONOMIST, you wouldn't ask such fourth-grade dumbfuck questions. But of course, you have never passed so much as an intro or survey level course in economics, so you have no idea at all of what the fuck you're talking about. Typical FFXU worthless assfuck.

You're no Economist Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Economist Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Just a simple question. If all education is
> free
> > how will it be funded. I can't figuer it out
> who
> > will pay for all the student loans and then pay
> > for college for the kids going now. Can
> someone
> > in a few words tell me how that will work?
>
> If you actually were an ECONOMIST, you wouldn't
> ask such fourth-grade dumbfuck questions. But of
> course, you have never passed so much as an intro
> or survey level course in economics, so you have
> no idea at all of what the fuck you're talking
> about. Typical FFXU worthless assfuck.


You're no Economist Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> I'm an Asshole...
>
> I've got nothing.
>

FrankR. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> By taxing the white man even more.

Attention, little Frankie-boy. Due to your broad-based ignorance and excessive stupidity, you don't make enough money to owe any taxes in any case. Dumbass stooge-fuck!

Its a Us VS Them Divide Game Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If Trump is elected expect jobs to improve, expect fewer people on welfare,
> expect the debt going down , expect good changes to Obamacare, and maybe
> some day unless Democrats can get back into the White House there will be
> enough money to do at least 2 years of free college for everyone.
>
> DAJAX

"Swing low, sweet Donald Trump, comin' for to carry me home..."

Talk about asshole visions of sugar plums! LOL! You have got to be one of the dumbest fucking assholes ever to post here. Is there simply NOTHING at all that you actually understand?

College bad,

pTD9U Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You're no Economist Wrote:
> -------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > I'm an Asshole...
> >
> > I've got nothing.
> >

LOL! I've got a local Fresh Market.

tWVxC Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> I'm an Asshole...
>
> I've got nothing.
>

Holy Assholes, Batman! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> I'm an Asshole...
>
> I've got nothing.
>

Iraq war fund Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> College bad...

Part of why there hasn't been an economically successful Republican administration in over 100 years. These derps don't know how to do economics. All they do is fuck things up. Happens every time.

LOL! People are laughing at you hapless chumps. Just as they always do.

You're no Economist Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> I'm an Asshole...
>
> I've got nothing.
>

Flaunt the stupid, you pathetic trash-head. Keep at it and at it and at it. It's perfectly plain already that your abject stupidity has left you utterly unable to post anything intelligent here. But just keep proving the point over and over and over again. That's what any self-respecting goober-shit total asshole would do in your position, so let's get busy over there, Mr. Stupid-shit. Time's awasting here!

­



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/30/2016 09:51AM by chuckhoffmann.

chuckhoffmann Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Do you believe that someone who has a college
> education can make more money over their lifetime
> than someone who doesn't?
>
> If the answer is "yes", then what will happen is
> these people with college educations will also be
> able to pay more in taxes over their working
> lifetimes.

OMG fuck you you're a commie!

You're no Economist Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Economist Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Just a simple question. If all education is
> free
> > how will it be funded. I can't figuer it out
> who
> > will pay for all the student loans and then pay
> > for college for the kids going now. Can
> someone
> > in a few words tell me how that will work?
>
> If you actually were an ECONOMIST, you wouldn't
> ask such fourth-grade dumbfuck questions. But of
> course, you have never passed so much as an intro
> or survey level course in economics, so you have
> no idea at all of what the fuck you're talking
> about. Typical FFXU worthless assfuck.

It does not have a thing to do with economics! It is fourth grade math cooked up over too many beers and far too little sense.

There are no commies. There are only assholes who run around screaming "Commie, Commie, Commie" all the live-long day. The screeching of crows in the cornfield makes more sense than that.

free school is bullshit that decisions was not made recently - and it's need came from farming not for some idea that keeping kids away from work and reality with their head in a book until age 26 was "a good idea" - but liberals say so ...

liberals in the late 1990's, to raise their wages, began saying "government schooling is essential to success"

this was at same time Teachers Union, homed in D.C. and run by blacks and foreigners, evolved. it's strictly a commie system

the hell of it is, it is a government who is Unionized and setting their own pay WITHOUT ANY COMPETITION

therefore it's an illegal union, would never get by a minute in court if challenged by Union Laws in the USA, and they KNOW IT

they've used this to "superfund" illegals getting green cards, raise their wages, and come in control of industry - extorting industry with certifications.

dems have been massively funneling IRS money to foreign nations under the guise of "science projects" - but also allowing USA money to be used to fund research for PRIVATE ENTERPRISES IN FOREIGN COUNTRIES, such as chinese electronics

furthermore - they've been lengthening the courses, filling them with endless trivia and confusion - to keep kids in school longer

---------------------------------

BIG private industry in USA protested ON TV against democrats moves to use IRS money and "only gov can certify" to make schools a money making machine for Unionized gov employees and top down control - also control of foreigners getting contracts for work and funneling money out of USA.

lastly the more recent publicized democrat move (noting the foremention is still completely denied by them)

is that "ALL SCHOOLS SHALL BE FUNDED THE SAME IN RICH AND POOR AREAS"

that move is also still debated by Republicans - that people who worked hard and saved should not have to SHARE ANY MONEY THEY SPEND with crack heads who fucked and smoked pot and should have to "pay the price" for choosing to be loiterers

is that "ALL SCHOOLS SHALL BE FUNDED THE SAME IN RICH AND POOR AREAS"

is the most recent issue that "is in the public light"

and it's STILL an issue

we've seen Asians, who got in USA under guise of gov schooling jobs

are now schooling their kids in separate "superfunded" magnate schools

which are anything but equal - they are picked winners who get anything they want and mostly using gov funds

Inquisitive One Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It does not have a thing to do with economics! It
> is fourth grade math cooked up over too many beers
> and far too little sense.

Not that anyone ever thought of you as any sort of knowledgeable person, but if you think economics has nothing to do with it, you are worse off than dead-grade stupid.

Shove the big text up your skinny little ass. you pathetic 8-year old dumbshit.

You're no Economist Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> I'm an Asshole...
>
> I've got nothing.
>

You're no Economist Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> I'm an Asshole...
>
> I've got nothing.
>

Keep at it, assfuck.

Fuck off, derp Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>

Shove the big text up your skinny little ass.
> you pathetic 8-year old dumbshit.

Please, go back to watching the "Wrecking Ball" video and leave us alone.

Keep at it, assfuck.

Keep at it, assfuck.

Keep at it, assfuck.

Keep at it, assfuck.

Keep at it, assfuck.

Isn't at least part of the problem that education is too expensive? Its supposed to be such a good investment but somehow people cannot pay back their student loans.

But why do people now think it needs to be free? I understand that the cost has gotten very expensive but why do people think it should be free? A known fact when a couple has kids the number one thing that they start doing is saving for college. Now everyone thinks the government should pay for it while they wasted their money eating out, going on vacations and buying expensive electronics. They why is this the governments problem?

Every black already gets a free ride to any university to major in Afro-Victim Studies, courtesy of the $60,000/yr being paid by white students'families.

Why isn't all of this made public what is given to everyone so people know this information or where can you find this information?

Most people really don't need to go to college. Want sanity? Reverse Duke Power v Griggs and allow IQ testing and dump the doctrine of disparate impact. That decision is largely what lead to the push for going to college to get a good job, since a degree was a proxy for IQ.

To all of the socialist communists in Fairfax, you want free college? Ok, but first you have to endure 4 hard years of slave labor cracking rocks with a pick, you know, for the true experience.

Or,you know... join the armed forces and get the GI bill.

Your problems ain't ours. Save your money like everyone else, or see above.

I am getting ready to retire and raised 7 kids and my husband and myself put them through school without government help but I be damned if I want my retirement money to pay for other people's kids. That is their parents responsibility. The parents need to take responsibility and save and do without if need be.

dhd8k Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Isn't at least part of the problem that education is too expensive?

Not so much that it's too expensive as that it's becoming unaffordable as currently financed. A large part of that came about through the success of TEA Party tax-cutter types in convincing state legislatures to cut taxes and fund those cuts by slashing support for higher education. Instead of all of us sharing the tab for the costs of college, we began to dump a much higher portion of the burden directly onto students. Then we "felt their pain" by offering them loans that they would not be able to pay back for years and years. The problem here in the end is that -- thanks to simplistic right-wing thinking -- we are now doing it wrong.

> Its supposed to be such a good investment but somehow people cannot
> pay back their student loans.

The returns to education have been higher than the returns to work for quite some time now. This is in part due to the fact that in the sacking of wages and benefits, returns to work have been depressed, again by short-sighted, right-wing, corporatist types of thinking. The weight of student debt derives importantly from the fact that we simply do not pay recent grads enough to both service those loans and live an actual life. They have to move in with Mom and Dad. They have to delay plans for marriage and children. They must in essence work through a period of indentured servitude before hard work can be enough to afford them the free life they'd always hoped for.

We have long offered a free K-12 education to everyone, and 12th grade was once enough. But it isn't anymore -- for anyone. Everyone today need access to some form of post-secondary education. We need to make that happen if we want to stay competitive in the world and move ahead. The word "we" here means everybody.

The economics of this are not actually hard. Remember how easily Bush invaded Iraq without paying for a penny of it. In the case of higher education, not much new spending would be required. We already have more than 20 million post-secondary students, and their bills are being paid somehow. The idea is to re-arrange that already existing funding into a different and less debt-dependent package. It would be a big help to us as a nation if we actually did that.

in reality........... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Economist Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Just a simple question. If all education is
> free
> > how will it be funded. I can't figuer it out
> who
> > will pay for all the student loans and then pay
> > for college for the kids going now. Can
> someone
> > in a few words tell me how that will work?
>
>
> .......Education costs nothing, it pays and pays
> and pays. Lack of education is what costs.


Training is what pays and pays and pays. Learning a skill through training. So, if you consider training as education, you are correct. However, at least 50% of a college education is wasted classes and useless knowledge transfer.

It's not a lack of education. It's a lack of marketable skills that costs society. Licensed plumbers and electricians make as much or more than PhD teachers.

donkey kong Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Most people really don't need to go to college.

So the people who didn't go to college like to tell us.

> Want sanity? Reverse Duke Power v Griggs and allow
> IQ testing and dump the doctrine of disparate impact.

The issue in Griggs v Duke Power (1971) was that the defendant's hiring practices had no relation to any ability of applicants to perform the jobs being advertised. They were overtly designed to exclude blacks from employment. There was a reason that the decision was unanimous among the justices participating.

> That decision is largely what lead to the push for going to
> college to get a good job, since a degree was a proxy for IQ.

That's a complete bunch of stooge-fuck bunk. Neither the law nor this case precluded the use of aptitude testing. They called for relevance in the use of such testing, famously alluding to a classic Aesop's Fable noting that serving the same plate of milk to a fox and a stork was not an example of equal treatment. I guess your being a racist dumbshit simply blinds you to such obvious facts.

Nothing is free Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> However, at least 50% of a college education is wasted
> classes and useless knowledge transfer.

Which 50%, moron? Who paid for your GED by the way?

> It's not a lack of education. It's a lack of
> marketable skills that costs society. Licensed
> plumbers and electricians make as much or more
> than PhD teachers.

God, but you're stupid. Attempts to monetize everything are the over-reaching acts of incompetent fools. There is good money to be found at the top levels of every field. The people who end up reaching those top levels are the people who love what they are doing. Those who are motivated only by a longing for money simply can't keep up. Do what you love, and the money will find you. It's as true of those who love plumbing as for those who love law or accounting.

Sorry. No matter how much you love doing Sociology, you will never be able to afford to move out of the Woodsbridge rental townhouse two doors down from the complex's resident drug dealer.

Solder this... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Nothing is free Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > However, at least 50% of a college education is
> wasted
> > classes and useless knowledge transfer.
>
> Which 50%, moron? Who paid for your GED by the
> way?
>
> > It's not a lack of education. It's a lack of
> > marketable skills that costs society. Licensed
> > plumbers and electricians make as much or more
> > than PhD teachers.
>
> God, but you're stupid. Attempts to monetize
> everything are the over-reaching acts of
> incompetent fools. There is good money to be
> found at the top levels of every field. The
> people who end up reaching those top levels are
> the people who love what they are doing. Those
> who are motivated only by a longing for money
> simply can't keep up. Do what you love, and the
> money will find you. It's as true of those who
> love plumbing as for those who love law or
> accounting.


LOL.

 
Attachments:

I'm glad that all colleges have implemented my tuition policies - from each according to their ability to pay, scholarships to each according to skin color (free for blacks).

Solder this... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Nothing is free Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > However, at least 50% of a college education is
> wasted
> > classes and useless knowledge transfer.
>
> Which 50%, moron? Who paid for your GED by the
> way?
>
> > It's not a lack of education. It's a lack of
> > marketable skills that costs society. Licensed
> > plumbers and electricians make as much or more
> > than PhD teachers.
>
> God, but you're stupid. Attempts to monetize
> everything are the over-reaching acts of
> incompetent fools. There is good money to be
> found at the top levels of every field. The
> people who end up reaching those top levels are
> the people who love what they are doing. Those
> who are motivated only by a longing for money
> simply can't keep up. Do what you love, and the
> money will find you. It's as true of those who
> love plumbing as for those who love law or
> accounting.

Great! So all of those liberal professors should be OK with working for little to nothing in pay to help make free education for all a reality.