McLean resident Antonin Scalia has passed away. R.I.P.

Typical lib response:

Star Member Botany (40,243 posts)

He is dead and that is good
---------------

Adenoid_Hynkel (13,313 posts)

Fuck that guy and good riddance
---------------

Jenny_92808 (436 posts)

Woo Hoo! Woo Hoo!
---------------

Plucketeer (9,723 posts)

Satan has a Royal Red carpet out for this scum.
---------------

2banon (5,618 posts)

CELEBRATION TIME!!
---------------

Star Member catchnrelease (1,164 posts)

I've been hoping for this for years
---------------

lobodons (1,270 posts)

Scalia was pure evil. Good riddance.
---------------

tabasco (21,348 posts)

Good riddance to rotten trash. He was an evil, corrupt human being and the world is a better place with him in the ground.
---------------

Star Member Curmudgeoness (17,838 posts)

I have no problem speaking ill of the dead. Good riddance. May he enjoy his eternity in Hell.
---------------

Star Member Ron Obvious (3,645 posts)

Good riddance, ya bastard. The world's frankly a better place without him in it.
---------------

Star Member Auggie (20,876 posts)

I'm not ashamed to say: this has made my day, my month, my decade
---------------

Star Member Paladin (13,648 posts)

Thank you Jesus.
---------------

Star Member Mira (18,856 posts)

Is it OK to reveal that my son and I stood on chairs for the highest fives ever?
---------------

sensitiveliberalspeakout Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Typical lib response:
>
> Star Member Botany (40,243 posts)
>
> He is dead and that is good
> ---------------
>
> Adenoid_Hynkel (13,313 posts)
>
> Fuck that guy and good riddance
> ---------------
>
> Jenny_92808 (436 posts)
>
> Woo Hoo! Woo Hoo!
> ---------------
>
> Plucketeer (9,723 posts)
>
> Satan has a Royal Red carpet out for this scum.
> ---------------
>
> 2banon (5,618 posts)
>
> CELEBRATION TIME!!
> ---------------
>
> Star Member catchnrelease (1,164 posts)
>
> I've been hoping for this for years
> ---------------
>
> lobodons (1,270 posts)
>
> Scalia was pure evil. Good riddance.
> ---------------
>
> tabasco (21,348 posts)
>
> Good riddance to rotten trash. He was an evil,
> corrupt human being and the world is a better
> place with him in the ground.
> ---------------
>
> Star Member Curmudgeoness (17,838 posts)
>
> I have no problem speaking ill of the dead. Good
> riddance. May he enjoy his eternity in Hell.
> ---------------
>
> Star Member Ron Obvious (3,645 posts)
>
> Good riddance, ya bastard. The world's frankly a
> better place without him in it.
> ---------------
>
> Star Member Auggie (20,876 posts)
>
> I'm not ashamed to say: this has made my day, my
> month, my decade
> ---------------
>
> Star Member Paladin (13,648 posts)
>
> Thank you Jesus.
> ---------------
>
> Star Member Mira (18,856 posts)
>
> Is it OK to reveal that my son and I stood on
> chairs for the highest fives ever?
> ---------------

what website is that from?

It is not clear on what basis you conclude that these reactions are typical. You went to one extremist site. Anyway, why not post about his opinions instead? Many of his opinions on antitrust cases were brilliant.

Conservatives press Senate GOP to block Obama nominee

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/conservatives-press-senate-gop-to-block-obama-nominee/article/2583232

Bad News Indeed. I have worried and hoped he would make it at least 5 more years. Scalia you were one of the Good Guys.

1. Now That Senate with some GOP members have confirmed two liberal Obama picks. They will not do that again . There probably will not be any Justice confirmed till the next president is in. Unless Obama appoints someone who both sides can agree on. A 50/50 Lib as such. But he will game the voters first.

2. Obama will appoint a liberal Spanish judge, knowing that the appointment will not be confirmed by the Senate to piss off the Spanish voters.

3. Obama will appoint a liberal Black judge, in the same way to piss off Blacks.

4. Obama may do the same with a Liberal Asian judge. And A White Woman.

5. Chief Justice Roberts will not allow some cases to be heard until there is a full court seated. Which means only some cases will be heard this year unless a Obama Justice is confirmed.

6. Until a new President is sworn in that's the way it will be. And thankfully the Next one will be a GOP President.

7. The News Media will have a Field Day with this Happy Days they are singing.

8. There will a lot of bitchen on FXU about this.

9. The GOP will hold the House and the Senate in 16 so. No new laws that are unconstitutional will be passed by Democrats.

10. Hillary will be brought to the bar of Justice in 2016 for sloppy handling of US Top Secret and above information and will not be the Democrat Canidate in Nov.16

DAJAX

http://www.democraticunderground.com/

Here's the score is right up until he thinks the GOP will go anywhere. They won't. This is really bad for conservatives. You ain't getting 5 more years of Scalia. Roberts is a populist and you will never get anything close to Scalia in ethos or style.

GOP has no chance in the general election unless Trump beats you, and Trump is a liberal, he's just using your base.

It is over. Conservatism is dead as Scalia.

I'd like to throw Michelle Takaoka's name into the ring for replacement justice.

Obama will now usher in sharia law with a muslim pick.
Bank on it.

For the Good of the Nation..And the Youth of Tomorrow.

>Here's the score is right up until he thinks the GOP will go anywhere.

They will.. it ain't over yet.

DAJAX

Now who will tell Thomas what to think?

Without a doubt, Eric Holder will be nominated. Barry already has two lesbians on the Court so no more are needed which rules out Janet Napolitano, who was considered a front-runner before. Holder is Obama's nigger and will step and fetch as directed...as he did as the most political attorney general ever. Hopefully the Senate Majority Leader will not allow a vote on any nominations that Barry sends up from now until he is out.

Eric Holder is a black panther, Is he also a muzzie?

Himself.. To take Office Jan 22 2017...LOL.

The Senate Majority leader should not be talking about Obamas nominations to give libs any ammo. Just let him nominate then look at them and if their libs, do not confirm. Simple. No need to start fires.

DAJAX

Hate to say it but the comments here are 100 times more sane and intelligent than those at TheBlaze & Foxnews. For a site that specializes in dick pics and racist rants Im proud of you guys here on ffxu

Black lady Judge in NYC with a leopard skin thing on her head was sworn in with a koran? Eric Holder or the black woman with the pelt on her head for the top picks.

This is going to be quite entertaining -

Did he recently eat scallops in Vienna?

It is doubtful this scenario will occur, but it would be fun if it did. Sandra Day O'Connor retired to spend more time with her husband, who developed Alzheimer's. By the time her replacement was confirmed and she left the court, her husband, unfortunately, was very far gone and was, I believe, was getting 24-hour care at a facility in Arizona. Justice O'Connor is still a sharp legal mind, and like many retired Federal judges, helps district courts experiencing heavy caseloads. Suppose the President were to nominate Justice O'Connor? Would the Republican-controlled Senate repudiate a distinguished Republican judge, and simultaneously walk away from the opportunity to confirm the fifth female justice? Oooh...think about it.

original understanding Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It is not clear on what basis you conclude that
> these reactions are typical. You went to one
> extremist site. Anyway, why not post about his
> opinions instead? Many of his opinions on
> antitrust cases were brilliant.


Because libtards.

Just watch this thread.

He was murdered. Pillow over the head.

Condolences to friends and family. I didnt agree with many of his rulings but I will miss the color he brought to the bench and admire his dedication to his beliefs and the country.

True the Vote! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Eric Holder is a black panther, Is he also a muzzie?

That's more like it. A bold move to defend one's title as dumbest fucking poster on the internets!

admire his dedication Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Condolences to friends and family. I didnt agree
> with many of his rulings but I will miss the color
> he brought to the bench and admire his dedication
> to his beliefs and the country.

Al Capone was Italian, Catholic, colorful, and dedicated to his beliefs and the country. It was a loss to his friends and family when he died as well.

Where did he live in McLean?

He lived off Wemberly Way near the intersection of 495 and the GW Parkway.

Can't wait until I can dance on his grave. Might leave a steaming pile on it too.

Troo the Voat! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> True the Vote! Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Eric Holder is a black panther, Is he also a
> muzzie?
>
> That's more like it. A bold move to defend one's
> title as dumbest fucking poster on the internets!

Indeed. But he's got some serious competition. True the Vote better stay on his toes!

Yehuti Peutiepäntz Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Can't wait until I can dance on his grave. Might
> leave a steaming pile on it too.


You could just stand there as far as the latter.

Same difference.

I don't usually care what actors think about politics, but Jim Beaver said this quite nicely on FB:

Jim Beaver
20 hrs ·

A great deal of what I know about U.S. constitutional law came from a brilliant show on PBS in the 1980s called THE CONSTITUTION: THAT DELICATE BALANCE, hosted by former Supreme Court justice Potter Stewart. It was a round-table discussion in front of an audience with a wide variety of politicians, political journalists, lawyers, and legal scholars. Each week, a hypothetical case would be presented to these people and they would discuss and argue the merits of the case under the laws of the nation, each case chosen so as to enable questions of constitutionality. It was one of the best things television has ever offered, and I found it magnificently enlightening.

That show was where I first encountered Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia. He was erudite. He was charming. He was stunningly well informed. He was one of my favorite panelists on the show. It was only much later that I realized how dreadful I found his positions on actual court cases, how distantly opposite we were in our core beliefs about many of the cases coming before the court, how dangerous I found many of his ideas.

So today's news leaves me with mixed feelings. I cannot but rejoice that he is no longer a factor on the court. But he also taught me so much about what the American constitution means and how remarkable its creation and endurance have been for the country I have no doubt he loved as much as I do. I hope we who opposed his positions can respond to this news with notable grace.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 02/14/2016 02:41PM by Ying Ko.

Now, Thomas will have to change and add someone else's name into his concurring opinions. I mean, he used to just say, "Ooooh yah-SUH Massah Scalia, suh. Ah sho' does agree wit' you. Lawdy, lawdy, we don' wan' dem Negros gettin' all uppity now, does we? Ah iz a good little house nigga that don' cause no trouble, Massah," and then do a little shuck and jive so Scalia would pat his black friend on the head. He'll have to be someone else's lapdog now.

o today's news leaves me with mixed feelings.

How gracious. Only a cold-hearted bastard would voice something like this in public before the body has even assumed room temperature. Better to say nothing...

bednt Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> o today's news leaves me with mixed
> feelings.
>
> How gracious. Only a cold-hearted bastard would
> voice something like this in public before the
> body has even assumed room temperature. Better to
> say nothing...


No mixed feelings here. He was a piece of shit who made this country worse and I'm celebrating his death. The only thing that makes me sad is the fact that it probably wasn't painful. I wish there was a hell, because then he'd be sucking Satan's barbed cock for eternity and getting gang raped by demons.

Seriously, fuck that fucking piece of shit. Stupid fucking Guinea piece of crap.

bednt Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> o today's news leaves me with mixed
> feelings.
>
> How gracious. Only a cold-hearted bastard would
> voice something like this in public before the
> body has even assumed room temperature. Better to
> say nothing...


I don't agree. Most libs are putting on their high heeled sneakers to dance on his grave.

SCOTUS Scrotum Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Now, Thomas will have to change and add someone
> else's name into his concurring opinions. I mean,
> he used to just say, "Ooooh yah-SUH Massah Scalia,
> suh. Ah sho' does agree wit' you. Lawdy, lawdy, we
> don' wan' dem Negros gettin' all uppity now, does
> we? Ah iz a good little house nigga that don'
> cause no trouble, Massah," and then do a little
> shuck and jive so Scalia would pat his black
> friend on the head. He'll have to be someone
> else's lapdog now.


Yeah, that's not racist at all.

lmao

Yehuti Peutiepäntz Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> bednt Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > o today's news leaves me with mixed
> > feelings.
> >
> > How gracious. Only a cold-hearted bastard
> would
> > voice something like this in public before the
> > body has even assumed room temperature. Better
> to
> > say nothing...
>
>
> No mixed feelings here. He was a piece of shit who
> made this country worse and I'm celebrating his
> death. The only thing that makes me sad is the
> fact that it probably wasn't painful. I wish there
> was a hell, because then he'd be sucking Satan's
> barbed cock for eternity and getting gang raped by
> demons.
>
> Seriously, fuck that fucking piece of shit. Stupid
> fucking Guinea piece of crap.


So are you.

mirror Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Yehuti Peutiepäntz Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > bednt Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > o today's news leaves me with mixed
> > > feelings.
> > >
> > > How gracious. Only a cold-hearted bastard
> > would
> > > voice something like this in public before
> the
> > > body has even assumed room temperature.
> Better
> > to
> > > say nothing...
> >
> >
> > No mixed feelings here. He was a piece of shit
> who
> > made this country worse and I'm celebrating his
> > death. The only thing that makes me sad is the
> > fact that it probably wasn't painful. I wish
> there
> > was a hell, because then he'd be sucking
> Satan's
> > barbed cock for eternity and getting gang raped
> by
> > demons.
> >
> > Seriously, fuck that fucking piece of shit.
> Stupid
> > fucking Guinea piece of crap.
>
>
> So are you.


BANG! ZOOM! That's a clever retort for a zika baby. Congrats, mirror.

Libby McTolerance Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> SCOTUS Scrotum Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Now, Thomas will have to change and add someone
> > else's name into his concurring opinions. I
> mean,
> > he used to just say, "Ooooh yah-SUH Massah
> Scalia,
> > suh. Ah sho' does agree wit' you. Lawdy, lawdy,
> we
> > don' wan' dem Negros gettin' all uppity now,
> does
> > we? Ah iz a good little house nigga that don'
> > cause no trouble, Massah," and then do a little
> > shuck and jive so Scalia would pat his black
> > friend on the head. He'll have to be someone
> > else's lapdog now.
>
>
> Yeah, that's not racist at all.
>
> lmao

Listen up, shitdick. When someone (Thomas) acts like a racial caricature (i.e. being the biggest Uncle Tom since "Uncle" Tom Sewell), and you call him on it, that ain't racist.

Ying Ko Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> A great deal of what I know about U.S. constitutional law
> came from a brilliant show on PBS in the 1980s called
> THE CONSTITUTION: THAT DELICATE BALANCE, hosted by former
> Supreme Court justice Potter Stewart.

The show first aired on The Learning Channel, it was produced by Columbia University, and the actual host was Fred Friendly, though an aging Potter Stewart did sit in to act as a sort of in-studio foil to Friendly, the veteran newsman. The round-table discussions themselves were moderated by legal notables such as Benno Schmidt (Columbia), Arthur Miller (NYU), and Charles Nesson (Harvard). The shows were informative, but basically went to show how unclear the panelists were about constitutional law, even those who were politicians, lawyers, and judges.

> That show was where I first encountered Supreme
> Court Justice Antonin Scalia.

That show was taped in 1982-83. Scalia had just been confirmed to the DC Court of Appeals at that time. He did not reach the Supreme Court until 1986. There were however several similar follow-up series -- e.g., The Bill of Rights, and Ethics in America I and II -- in which Scalia did appear.

> He was erudite. He was charming. He was stunningly well informed.

He was fabulously wrong about everything.

> I hope we who opposed his positions can respond to
> this news with notable grace.

He didn't earn that. What he earned was scorn and vilification. Whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.

SCOTUS Scrotum Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Now, Thomas will have to change and add someone
> else's name into his concurring opinions.

Clarence Thomas may be carrying some very unfortunate baggage, but he is easily as intellectually competent as Scalia was. The dull-brained trained-seal on the bench is Alito. Bush was right -- Harriet Miers would have been better.

Actually.... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> He didn't earn that. What he earned was scorn and
> vilification. Whatsoever a man soweth, that shall
> he also reap.


I believe you meant "seweth"! LOL!

Actually.... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Ying Ko Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > A great deal of what I know about U.S.
> constitutional law
> > came from a brilliant show on PBS in the 1980s
> called
> > THE CONSTITUTION: THAT DELICATE BALANCE, hosted
> by former
> > Supreme Court justice Potter Stewart.
>
> The show first aired on The Learning Channel, it
> was produced by Columbia University, and the
> actual host was Fred Friendly, though an aging
> Potter Stewart did sit in to act as a sort of
> in-studio foil to Friendly, the veteran newsman.
> The round-table discussions themselves were
> moderated by legal notables such as Benno Schmidt
> (Columbia), Arthur Miller (NYU), and Charles
> Nesson (Harvard).

Way to go google boy!

Court Watcher Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Clarence Thomas may be carrying some very
> unfortunate baggage, but he is easily as
> intellectually competent as Scalia was.

I agree with this statement 100%. (But probably not for the same reason you do.)

Conny McTardance Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Libby McTolerance Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > SCOTUS Scrotum Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Now, Thomas will have to change and add
> someone
> > > else's name into his concurring opinions. I
> > mean,
> > > he used to just say, "Ooooh yah-SUH Massah
> > Scalia,
> > > suh. Ah sho' does agree wit' you. Lawdy,
> lawdy,
> > we
> > > don' wan' dem Negros gettin' all uppity now,
> > does
> > > we? Ah iz a good little house nigga that don'
> > > cause no trouble, Massah," and then do a
> little
> > > shuck and jive so Scalia would pat his black
> > > friend on the head. He'll have to be someone
> > > else's lapdog now.
> >
> >
> > Yeah, that's not racist at all.
> >
> > lmao
>
> Listen up, shitdick. When someone (Thomas) acts
> like a racial caricature (i.e. being the biggest
> Uncle Tom since "Uncle" Tom Sewell), and you call
> him on it, that ain't racist.


Thanks for making my point... again. lol

Sucks when one of them nigra boys gets away don't it?

And how bout dem Jews?

wiki user Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Way to go google boy!

Wouldn't have looked it up if the original post hadn't gone "CLANK!" in such a clear and distinct manner.

Here's the deal, Obama. You want your nominee to get a hearing by the Senate before you leave? Here's how you get that: You instruct Loretta Lynch that when the FBI sends over its investigation results on Hillary's email, she is to go forward with an indictment. Period. An indictment for a hearing. For each felony count she's convicted on for which a jail sentence of at least one year is pronounced, the GOP will commit to one positive vote for your nominee.

Make the deal or you get squat.

House nigger says what? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I agree with this statement 100%. (But probably not for
> the same reason you do.)

I'll try to clarify then. Scalia's seemingly affable sarcasm was often mistaken for intellect. Thomas's brooding silence has often been mistaken for lack of intellect. Scalia's intellect has thus been over-rated while Thomas's has been under-rated.

Actually.... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> wiki user Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Way to go google boy!
>
> Wouldn't have looked it up if the original post
> hadn't gone "CLANK!" in such a clear and distinct
> manner.


You didn't "have" to look anything up. It's not like someone was holding a gun to your head. Besides, the substance was in the actual critique of his judicial philosophy, not what channel a program aired. That's wholly irrelevant. It matters to nobody but you.

wiki user Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You didn't "have" to look anything up. It's not
> like someone was holding a gun to your head.
> Besides, the substance was in the actual critique
> of his judicial philosophy, not what channel a
> program aired. That's wholly irrelevant. It
> matters to nobody but you.

Recollections of the show were -- as it turned out -- all wrong. It was only the "all" part that needed verification.

Court Watcher Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> House nigger says what? Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I agree with this statement 100%. (But probably
> not for
> > the same reason you do.)
>
> I'll try to clarify then. Scalia's seemingly
> affable sarcasm was often mistaken for intellect.
> Thomas's brooding silence has often been mistaken
> for lack of intellect. Scalia's intellect has
> thus been over-rated while Thomas's has been
> under-rated.


You kidding? Thomas is pants-on-head retarded.

It aint over till its over. This November. Hillary's going down, that's why she paid such lip service to Obama the other day to keep the Law Dogs Off her ass.

Bernies all you got. Obama will fill Scalia's seat with a recess apt. just in time to hear the affirmative action case. and That's all he's going to get.

DAJAX

JBW Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Here's the deal, Obama. You want your nominee to
> get a hearing by the Senate before you leave?
> Here's how you get that: You instruct Loretta
> Lynch that when the FBI sends over its
> investigation results on Hillary's email, she is
> to go forward with an indictment. Period. An
> indictment for a hearing. For each felony count
> she's convicted on for which a jail sentence of at
> least one year is pronounced, the GOP will commit
> to one positive vote for your nominee.
>
> Make the deal or you get squat.

You are on fairfaxunderground pretending to negotiate with the White House? Seriously?

Laugh Now Cry Later Libs Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It aint over till its over. This November.
> Hillary's going down, that's why she paid such lip
> service to Obama the other day to keep the Law
> Dogs Off her ass.
>
> Bernies all you got. Obama will fill Scalia's seat
> with a recess apt. just in time to hear the
> affirmative action case. and That's all he's going
> to get.
>
> DAJAX

Next time, get drafted and grow the fuck up.

Not You Punk..And he ended the draft. And You .. Despicable sack of shit.. Pretending to be a Veteran with your bullshit, Fuck Off and tell us about your Military record . We know all about stolen valor , gun grabbing leftist shit head.

That Was Up To Uncle Sam Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Not You Punk..And he ended the draft. And You ..
> Despicable sack of shit.. Pretending to be a
> Veteran with your bullshit, Fuck Off and tell us
> about your Military record . We know all about
> stolen valor , gun grabbing leftist shit head.
Attachments:

Result of Bowel problems no doubt

Is it true he went to Holy Spirit church in Annandale?

LOLWUT? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You kidding? Thomas is pants-on-head retarded.

You don't know Thomas, or his history, or his opinions. There is rather a good case to be made for his being damaged goods emotionally, but his intellect is and always has been keen. He has unfortunately never learned to use his powers for good.

There is no set number of Justices required by any law.

The repubs can sit on a nomination forever, and there's nothing libcucks can do about it.

.... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> There is no set number of Justices required by any
> law.
>
> The repubs can sit on a nomination forever, and
> there's nothing libcucks can do about it.


Yea, Mitch McConnell would like to sit on it....and suck it too.
War Hero Mitchie was discharged from the Army for sodomy.

Father Pat Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Is it true he went to Holy Spirit church in
> Annandale?


Yes but he was NOT abused by our priests.

.... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> There is no set number of Justices required by any
> law. The repubs can sit on a nomination forever,
> and there's nothing libcucks can do about it.

Right. The Court can simply carry on with just eight Justices. But without
Scalia, all the 5-4 Lib decisions simply become 5-3 Lib decisions, while all the 5-4 Con decisions become 4-4 ties, meaning that the lower court ruling stands. Scalia is taking the conservative cause with him to his grave.

They need to figure out who killed him.

Don't cross the Clinton Machine.. Even the FBI leaves us alone..

Actually.... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> wiki user Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > You didn't "have" to look anything up. It's
> not
> > like someone was holding a gun to your head.
> > Besides, the substance was in the actual
> critique
> > of his judicial philosophy, not what channel a
> > program aired. That's wholly irrelevant. It
> > matters to nobody but you.
>
> Recollections of the show were -- as it turned out
> -- all wrong.

And, as pointed out - completely irrelevant.

> It was only the "all" part that
> needed verification.

Only if your some sort of autistic idiot. The poster was quoting a semi-famous liberal Democrat.