I am pissed off today. Justin Wolfe will be found not guilty next year, after he killed Somone. This guy will be in our streets, selling and dealing drugs. He would also be killing people. How should this be allowed in America? Why are peope allows to kill others and spend little to no time in jail? I'm right to be angry?

How do you know he'll be found not guilty? Inside knowledge of jury rigging?

Talking to his mom. The state doesn't have the evidence anymore. They don't ahve what they need to find him guilty. Even tho he should of died a long time ago

NYdVb Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> How do you know he'll be found not guilty? Inside
> knowledge of jury rigging?

If the glove dont fit you must acquit. I think it is a great showcase of the American Justice system working properly for once. He should be freed without further ado.

stop bitching and DO something about it FAG!!

The FACTS all show that it was self-defense, period.

Only in America? False....go to Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Syria, etc.

nFm6H Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The FACTS all show that it was self-defense,
> period.


GO FUCK HIM UP THE ASS LIKE HE LIEKS IT FUCKINGASSHOLE. I HATE JUSTIN WOLFE SO FUCKING MUCH.HE KILLED A GOOD FRIEND OF MINE AND HE SHOULD DIE

Anyone have link to the 48 hours special they did on him?


"millionaire boys club"

its not just America . Go to south Africa. the legless guy shot his girlfriend in cold blood but it was called an accident.

If you are talking about the guy convicted of murder even after the actual murderer confessed and also recanted his accusations that Wolfe ordered the murder (all surppressed by the prosecution)? http://apublicdefender.com/2014/02/04/virginia-prosecutors-will-do-just-about-anything-to-execute-justin-wolfe/

This was criminal misconduct by the prosecutor and Wolfe should have grounds to sue the Commonwealth for a boat load of money.

Here is what the court of appeals 4th district said of the prosecutor withholding evidence from the defense:

During Wolfe's evidentiary hearing in the district court, the Commonwealth's Attorney explained that his office does not have an "open-file policy," providing criminal defense counsel access to entire case files. See J.A. 3690. Asked to elaborate, he offered the flabbergasting explanation that he has "found in the past when you have information that is given to certain counsel and certain defendants, they are able to fabricate a defense around what is provided." Id. Additionally, the Assistant Commonwealth's Attorney admitted that he does not produce evidence to a criminal defendant unless he first deems it to be "material[]" and "credib[le]." Id. at 3782. The district court rightly lambasted that conduct in its Brady Order:

In effect, Ebert admits here that his contempt of defendants who "fabricate a defense" guides his perspective on disclosing information. This is particularly troubling in the case at bar where the record is replete with statements from Ebert and Conway regarding the scrutiny and credibility determinations that they made (as opposed to the jury) regarding the relevance of any potential exculpatory evidence. Essentially, in an effort to ensure that no defense would be "fabricated," Ebert and Conway's actions 424*424 served to deprive Wolfe of any substantive defense in a case where his life would rest on the jury's verdict. The Court finds these actions not only unconstitutional in regards to due process, but abhorrent to the judicial process.

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=18432954970590598003

In other words if they only evidence against you is by the trigger man in a murder himself and then said trigger man recants and there is no additional evidence you cannot convict. Its criminal that the Commonwealth withheld the recantation by the actual murderer from the Wolfe and his attorney.

.........his mom says he is going to get off..... Wtf do you expect her to say?

You're probably too young to remember; Did O.J. Simpson come to mind?