HomeFairfax General ForumArrest/Ticket SearchWiki newPictures/VideosChatArticlesLinksAbout
Fairfax County General :  Fairfax Underground fairfax underground logo
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
WaPo editorial questions legitimacy of McAuliffe's "car company"
Posted by: Terry McShady ()
Date: August 14, 2013 08:23PM

Terry McAuliffe’s former car company is signaling problems in his Virginia governor’s race

By Editorial Board, Published: August 13


TERRY MCAULIFFE, the Democratic nominee for governor of Virginia, launched an electric-car company shortly after his failure to win the same nomination four years ago. Over the years, he made lofty predictions about the pace of hiring and production at the firm, known as GreenTech Automotive.

The company remains a fledgling, unproven venture with a modest payroll of 100 people and no significant production capacity; whether it takes off in the coming year, as company executives insist it will, is anyone’s guess. Judging by the evidence to date, laid out by The Post’s Fredrick Kunkle, things don’t look promising.

GreenTech relies heavily on financing from wealthy foreigners, many of them Chinese, who pony up at least $500,000 each through a federal program designed to attract overseas investors. In return for their investments, they receive U.S. visas and may become eligible for permanent residency green cards.

TheEB-5 visa program is legal; it’s been operating since 1990 with bipartisan support. The troubling question is whether GreenTech, as conceived by Mr. McAuliffe, is a serious and viable automotive enterprise or mainly a scheme to attract foreign investment capital and serve Mr. McAuliffe’s political agenda.

The fact that production has ramped up so slowly — to date, just a few hundred golf-cart-sized electric cars have rolled off the assembly line — feeds those suspicions. So does a federal investigation focusing on whether a senior official at the Department of Homeland Security gave Mr. McAuliffe special treatment, based on his political connections, in approving EB-5 visas for GreenTech’s foreign investors.

Equally disconcerting is GreenTech’s refusal to allow journalists to tour its factory in Mississippi. According to former GreenTech employees who spoke to The Post, the plant is a Potemkin manufacturing facility, where managers stage a semblance of production for the benefit of visitors. Company officials deny that. If it’s untrue, they should allow journalists to see for themselves.

Mr. McAuliffe resigned quietly as GreenTech’s chairman in December; he remains the firm’s largest shareholder. His Republican opponent for governor, Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli II, has pounced on GreenTech’s so-far spotty record, raising an array of questions in the hope that something sticks.

Many of the accusations Mr. Cuccinelli’s campaign has leveled at Mr. McAuliffe are nonsense, particularly the suggestion that there was something scandalous about locating the venture in Mississippi (which offered financial incentives) rather than Virginia (which didn’t).

A more serious allegation, which has prompted an investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission, is that GreenTech made improper promises to investors, suggesting they would receive guaranteed returns on their investments.

Mr. McAuliffe is a renowned fundraiser and a wealthy man. He’s leveraged his extensive political network with some of his money-making ventures, and he tried to do the same with GreenTech.

That’s not particularly disturbing. But if the company is mainly smoke and mirrors — if it is little more than a visa mill launched to serve Mr. McAuliffe’s political ambitions — that is disturbing. Virginians are right to press him for answers.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/terry-mcauliffes-former-car-company-is-signaling-problems-in-his-virginia-governors-race/2013/08/13/b55b38b6-0430-11e3-a07f-49ddc7417125_story.html

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: WaPo editorial questions legitimacy of McAuliffe's "car company"
Posted by: Smell a Pig ()
Date: August 15, 2013 06:53AM

Terry has always been a fraud. You have to be a Marion Barry fan to vote for a sleaze like him.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: WaPo editorial questions legitimacy of McAuliffe's "car company"
Posted by: Real Voter ()
Date: August 15, 2013 07:25AM

Both candidates for the Virginia Governor election suck. Bolling should run.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: WaPo editorial questions legitimacy of McAuliffe's "car company"
Posted by: johndoll ()
Date: October 09, 2020 09:25AM

Terry McAuliffe was always a fraudster who couldn't be trusted. As a student of the political faculty, I know perfectly well when people want to benefit from you and no more, so I initially understood that this man is a fraud. Most recently, my friend received a strange email in which she was invited to work. I immediately thought that this is a rather strange idea, since she hasn't even graduated from University yet and it is unlikely that she can now work as a lawyer. She was so inspired by this email that she didn't believe me. I decided to check out this company via https://www.honorsociety.org/scam and it turned out that these are scammers who have long been deceiving students. So my intuition has never failed me yet.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: WaPo editorial questions legitimacy of McAuliffe's "car company"
Posted by: Fast Terry Did Not Get His Name ()
Date: October 09, 2020 11:16PM

For singing loudly in church , he's a opportunist bum , how hard is it to run as a Democrat in a state that's going blue with incoming liberals by the thousands for now until the real Virginia gets enough of them. Fast Terry bought his office , he stands for nothing and is only in it for himself and that's obvious but Democrats will vote for the Devil and they have over and over if the Devil has (D) after their name at this point . Fast Terry is a wonderful bullshit saleman but never buy a car from him even if you are a Democrat

Options: ReplyQuote


Your Name: 
Your Email (Optional): 
Subject: 
Attach a file
  • No file can be larger than 75 MB
  • All files together cannot be larger than 300 MB
  • 30 more file(s) can be attached to this message
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 ********   **     **  **      **   *******   **       
 **     **  **     **  **  **  **  **     **  **       
 **     **  **     **  **  **  **  **         **       
 ********   *********  **  **  **  ********   **       
 **         **     **  **  **  **  **     **  **       
 **         **     **  **  **  **  **     **  **       
 **         **     **   ***  ***    *******   ******** 
This forum powered by Phorum.