There is help you know Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> MS-13 Wrote:
https://youtu.be/DvomV1Rxs4k
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > “Ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny” was
> coined
> > by a German biologist and philosopher that
> > basically means, the evolution of a species
> (over
> > a course of time), tends to match pretty well
> with
> > how a specific member of that species
> individually
> > develops (over their lifetime). This in of
> itself
> > does not explain what happens when we die but
> is
> > the key to truly understanding how and why we
> > continue to exist after death.
> >
> > Ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny. In short,
> human
> > evolution can be traced back to a one celled
> > organism and everything in between (fish-like
> > creatures, small mammals, hominids, etc.). This
> > took billions of years to happen. Before that,
> > life did not exist … non-living matter in the
> > primordial soup. But life did come from
> non-living
> > matter at one point in time. Same goes for
> > individual human development from sperm/egg.
> Sperm
> > and eggs are created from our parents and the
> food
> > they ate (plants/animals), which in part was
> > developed from inert matter and dirt in the
> ground
> > at some point in time. Cells divide, we become
> a
> > fetus, born a stupid baby and eventually
> continue
> > to develop into fully formed “intelligent”
> > adults with advanced human brains. These brains
> > are basically equal to the advanced human
> brains
> > that developed in evolution (because they’re
> the
> > same). So, in roughly 9 months in the womb and
> > 18-21 years before full development, our brains
> > essentially go through the same development
> that
> > it took 3.8 billion years to evolve into.
> >
> > On the surface, this means nothing for the
> > “what’s next question” though and
> doesn’t
> > answer what happens when we die. But if you
> take
> > these parallel paths based on the non-physical
> > progress of human evolution/development, you
> can
> > come up with a pretty solid theory as to what
> will
> > happen next for human evolution, and what
> happens
> > when our bodies and brains cease to function as
> we
> > know it.
> >
> > Basically, through evolution and human
> > development, we see a continuous path of
> evolving
> > consciousness (or awareness). Each stage is
> more
> > complex but ultimately, we max out. In
> evolution
> > and human development, we went from small
> > cell-based life-form (womb), to one with a
> > heartbeat (womb), initial brain development
> > (womb), instinct/reactive (baby), awareness of
> > environment (toddler), conscious/self-awareness
> > (toddler/child), true self-consciousness (older
> > child), fully self-conscious/empathetic to
> others
> > (from adolescence through adulthood). There is
> > unlikely to be any further human evolution and
> we
> > have basically evolved ourselves out of any
> more
> > evolution. This happened becoming controllers
> of
> > our environments vs. controlled by it. Being a
> > slave to your environment, is the key to what
> > spurs evolution. Likewise, we also can’t
> develop
> > beyond a fully grown human brain because we are
> > limited by the capabilities of our bodies. So,
> to
> > track the next step in both processes, you have
> to
> > identify what is the next stage of
> consciousness.
> >
> >
> > If you take “self-consciousness” as the
> last
> > evolved and developed form of consciousness and
> > track the development, then you can infer that
> the
> > next stage would logically be
> > “others-consciousness.” We can’t evolve
> into
> > some sort of empathetic/altruistic species,
> > because there’s nothing pushing for this as
> an
> > “advantage.” If anything, any mutation for
> > this trait will result in a person being less
> > likely to pass on their genes, so our brains
> are
> > no longer evolving. It’s a fact. You do see
> very
> > small bits of this, which is based in empathy
> > (which is interestingly the last emotion to
> evolve
> > and develop), but we’ll never evolve to some
> > sort of borg-like collective consciousness
> > species. If you argue that humans may
> eventually
> > reach this phase, there is reason to think
> it’s
> > possible through AI. In the future, we will be
> > able to digitally replicate our brains and
> these
> > digital replications will have the ability to
> > interact with other digitally replicated
> brains.
> > Like one big super-computer/Portuguese man o’
> > war. Side-note, humans won’t be able to
> compete
> > with this “creation” and we’ll probably
> die
> > out to this more advanced “human species.”
> > Westworld and Terminator are on to something -
> > this is nothing new.
> >
> > But others-consciousness is not only
> theoretically
> > possible, it’s almost unavoidable (unless we
> > kill ourselves before then). Individually, the
> > only way to reach this in our “life-time”
> is
> > to be freed what is preventing us from the
> > experience/brains of others. What is preventing
> us
> > from further consciousness is the same in both
> > evolution and development, our bodies. However,
> > when we die, we are freed from those
> > constraints/limitations and we become “one
> with
> > the universe” (I know, that’s really lame,
> but
> > it sums it up). What is left of “us” and
> our
> > consciousness will be able to
> interact/instantly
> > become aware with everything that has ever
> lived
> > and had a thought. You are still “you,”
> > because you have individual experiences for
> > context, but we also gain a true knowledge of
> > everything that ever happened to everyone.
> It’s
> > pretty intense. In a way, we become what some
> > people may call “god.” We had to live and
> had
> > to have individual experiences in life in order
> to
> > have any perspective of this, but at this point
> > will gain true empathy of everything else in
> the
> > world. We become all-knowing and a perfect
> being
> > (along with billions of other life-forms).
> >
> > This just sounds like some crazy theory until
> you
> > look at what science is beginning to learn
> about
> > our brains. If you take the whole AI argument
> out
> > of it (so no more evolution, only individual
> death
> > now), there is plenty of evidence to indicate
> that
> > we continue to develop consciousness after we
> die.
> > You can look at out of body experiences and
> > near-death experiences. Although the most
> common
> > medical argument is that these are biproducts
> from
> > hormones and chemicals that are released when
> we
> > die, there is reason to believe this is not
> only
> > the case. A near-death experience should never
> > have developed…we should never be comforted
> by
> > death and never be complacent to
> it…basically,
> > the death process should be as terrifying as
> > possible so people avoid it at all cost. That
> > would result in a favorable trait/higher
> > fitness/survival and those with this trait
> would
> > have more opportunity to pass it on. So, the
> fact
> > that it exists at all, partially proves it’s
> > either a gift from an altruistic creator or
> > something more.
> >
> > There is also scientific evidence that this
> > transformation/evolution of consciousness can
> be
> > accessed through drugs of various forms. This
> > includes DMT and in plant form, Ayahuasca.
> Other
> > hallucinogens as well, but those trigger the
> > response less efficiently…and no, I do not
> > recommend trying any of these while alive. They
> do
> > however offer some glimpse into what death is
> like
> > since it’s been found that people who take
> these
> > will report being out of their body, being able
> to
> > communicate with superior life-forms, being
> “one
> > with the universe,” etc. Look it up - it’s
> > pretty fascinating. The most informative reason
> > that DMT is different from other “drugs”
> and
> > relevant to death, is that these drugs kind of
> > mimic natural chemicals that are released by
> the
> > pineal gland when we die. This is a bit up for
> > debate though. There is a researcher, David E.
> > Nichols, who says that this is not possible
> > because the pineal gland is too small and
> can’t
> > actually produce such a large dose. This
> actually
> > merits more truth to the argument towards
> > evolution of consciousness when we die because
> it
> > seems to indicate that the experience (and DMT)
> > isn’t solely a mind/body response. There’s
> > more to it. It’s a process but the naturally
> > occurring chemicals in the pineal gland are
> > involved. You can also touch upon this realm
> when
> > experiencing a hypnagogic experience (caused
> > through a faulty sleep-wake cycle). Some people
> > can master hypnagogic experiences and lucid
> > dream/purposefully interact with the other
> realm,
> > but this is really difficult to do and really
> only
> > a small fraction of insight into it. Still
> though,
> > kind of a cool skill to develop if you can get
> > past the terror the hallucinations and
> paralysis
> > initially cause.
> >
> > So there you have it, you evolve into everyone.
> > There’s no heaven/hell and you go the same
> place
> > as Hitler. But you also go the same place as
> > everyone and everything you’ve ever cared
> about
> > and you become another you that is everything.
> > It’s not sad or scary, it’s pretty awesome.
> > But don’t rush there because that’s not
> good
> > either. While on earth, there is every
> motivation
> > to do good unto others. The whole point is to be
> a
> > good person during your time here and you reap
> the
> > benefits when you get to the next place. If
> hurt
> > others or cause harm during your time here,
> when
> > you gain this level of
> understanding/consciousness
> > and personally experience and comprehend the
> harm
> > you’ve done, you will basically be living in
> > your own personal hell.
>
> Come down yet?
Attachments: