President Putin says he won't let aides testify before Congress. After all, it's none of their business what the White House does. They are just supposed to pass the legislation he demands.

GTFO

Hey, the creep is trying to play dictator and fucking over all of us. What could be more on-topic than that?

Worst Prez Ever... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hey, the creep is trying to play dictator and
> fucking over all of us. What could be more
> on-topic than that?

Get over yourself sissy.

Don't forget he's trying to hide his taxes from a plainly legal request as well. He thinks he's above the law entirely. It's a total betrayal of his oath of office.

Wanton lawbreaker Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Don't forget he's trying to hide his taxes from a
> plainly legal request as well. He thinks he's
> above the law entirely. It's a total betrayal of
> his oath of office.

Right here or STFU

Release your IQ right here. We all know it can't be as high as 50 anyway.

^^^ What a fucking dope Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Release your IQ right here. We all know it can't
> be as high as 50 anyway.

You want to see Trump's taxes, you should be comfortable releasing yours.

This isn't Red China you fascist totalitarian jackass.

God, but you're stupid. There is a long-standing LAW that requires the IRS to make Trump's tax returns available to certain Congressional officers upon request, the very ones in fact that have recently requested them. They could request MY returns as well. but I doubt that they are going to, as I'm not the head of any international crime cartels.

Meanwhile, anyone trying to deny such a request is flat-out trying to subvert the Rule of Law.

He's a shameless crook Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> God, but you're stupid. There is a long-standing
> LAW that requires the IRS to make Trump's tax
> returns available to certain Congressional
> officers upon request, the very ones in fact that
> have recently requested them. They could request
> MY returns as well. but I doubt that they are
> going to, as I'm not the head of any international
> crime cartels.
>
> Meanwhile, anyone trying to deny such a request is
> flat-out trying to subvert the Rule of Law.

What crime?

>Don't forget he's trying to hide his taxes from a plainly legal request as well.

The law never required him to release his taxes you hateful POS

DONT BULLSHIT ABOUT THE LAW DEMOCRATS! ONCE AGAIN AMERICA LEARNS

THE DEMOCRATS RULE OF LAW

" NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW EXCEPT ILLEGAlS "

The Request Is Unlawful Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The law never required him to release his taxes you hateful POS

Thanks for revealing how totally ignorant you are.

Cite the US code that required Trump to provide his income tax info as a candidate for President

Now STFU you stupid SOB All the rest of your BS game to get Trump are all fruit from a poisonous tree

Make it up as they go along with help from unconstitutional friends on federal courts that should be impeached not Trump

I tell you what, if I could just see Trumps tax return, a recient one, not the one from 2012 that Ralph Maddow ileagaly obtained and read on the air and went over as well as Harold Rivers opening Al Capones vault, I do believe if saw that taxe return world peace would suddenly happen and all AGW would suddenly be reversed...

either that, or it it would give me a hard on that I could use on my goat

He doesn’t have to release his returns, but under law, the IRS does. Read something, for Christ’s sake!

If there was anything in them, they would have already been leaked. Mueller's team saw them. There's nothing there.

And guess who else can see anyone's tax returns. That's right, the president of the US. He should immediately have Pelosi's, Schumer's, Water's, Nadler's, and every democrat running for president's and every democrat committee chair's tax returns sent over to his team immediately.

Personally, I'd love to see the tax returns of these democrats. You it's sketchy when they aren't calling for Trump to release his.

Everyone is fair game Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> And guess who else can see anyone's tax returns.
> That's right, the president of the US.

No, that’s not right. 26 USC 6103

If Trump attempts simply to flaunt and ignore Congressional oversight, he will force House Dems into impeaching him. There are very few places to hide from an impeachment inquiry.

The only impeaching that needs to be done is the half of Congress involved in the pedophile rings, and the ones that are too damn stupid to be in charge of the legislation in this country.

People can be so fucking stupid. Thinking that Trump should be able to just do as he pleases would be one sure sign of that.

>People can be so fucking stupid.

Like you and the Democrats thinking they can investigate the hell out of Trump because she lost after Democrat operatives lied and came up with a treasonous plan to overthrow the election of the people first by bogus Russian collusion claims now with lame as shit obstruction of justice and more crap

This will not help Democrats one bit in 2020 and that's the real MAGA news to see them slit their own political throats. the stupid Democrat haters who are doing absolutely nothing in congress but hating Trump

^^^ What a fucking dope Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I need the BBC real BAD!

So fucking what. Illegal leeches and dems have been ignoring the law for years.

Winners talk about winning.
Losers talk about winners.

Treason on top of treason Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> President Putin says he won't let aides testify
> before Congress. After all, it's none of their
> business what the White House does. They are just
> supposed to pass the legislation he demands.


Obama used Executive Privilege 3 times.
W. Bush asserted executive privilege six times, while Bill Clinton did so in 14 instances.

It's not illegal and it's not new. - Quit lying.

Coming attractions Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If Trump attempts simply to flaunt and ignore
> Congressional oversight, he will force House Dems
> into impeaching him. There are very few places to
> hide from an impeachment inquiry.

You got it. He can own up on his own or the sheriff can come wring it all out of him.

SumMo Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Obama used Executive Privilege 3 times.
> W. Bush asserted executive privilege six times.
> Bill Clinton did so in 14 instances.
>
> It's not illegal and it's not new. - Quit lying.

You're even more stupid than your long history of ignorance here has suggested. Claims of executive privilege and flat-out refusal to comply with duly authorized subpoenas and the like are two completely different things. Trump is WELL outside of American law and tradition here.

Worst President ever... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> You're even more stupid than your long history of
> ignorance here has suggested. Claims of executive
> privilege and flat-out refusal to comply with duly
> authorized subpoenas and the like are two
> completely different things. Trump is WELL
> outside of American law and tradition here.


 
Attachments:

He sounds smarter than any finger-painting grade-school loser like you. What's your IQ anyway? 65? 70? Tell the truth, now.

Worst President ever... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> SumMo Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Obama used Executive Privilege 3 times.
> > W. Bush asserted executive privilege six times.
> > Bill Clinton did so in 14 instances.
> >
> > It's not illegal and it's not new. - Quit
> lying.
>
> You're even more stupid than your long history of
> ignorance here has suggested. Claims of executive
> privilege and flat-out refusal to comply with duly
> authorized subpoenas and the like are two
> completely different things. Trump is WELL
> outside of American law and tradition here.

You ignorant asshole. The congress issues a subpoena, the president refuses to comply citing executive privilege, and the courts settle it.

Bumble, fumble, stumble... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> He sounds smarter than any finger-painting
> grade-school loser like you. What's your IQ
> anyway? 65? 70? Tell the truth, now.


'sounds'? Are you hearing things? Do you see things too that aren't there - like collusion? lol....

SumMo Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You ignorant asshole. The congress issues a
> subpoena, the president refuses to comply citing
> executive privilege, and the courts settle it.

LOL! Executive privilege is not some blanket excusifier. Under law, you cannot simply claim to be exempt from review and oversight by the other branches. You need to grow up and so does Trump. I do

Worst President ever Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> SumMo Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > You ignorant asshole. The congress issues a
> > subpoena, the president refuses to comply
> citing
> > executive privilege, and the courts settle it.
>
> LOL! Executive privilege is not some blanket
> excusifier. Under law, you cannot simply claim to
> be exempt from review and oversight by the other
> branches. You need to grow up and so does Trump.
> I do

LOL you dumb fuck - I never said it was 'some blanket excusifier.' I said that the courts settle it. That's your third branch settling the dispute. Your problem is that you projected your own lie onto my statement, rather than reading what I wrote.

Why would a president claim privilege if no subpoena had been issued? There is no need to claim it unless someone asks for the privileged information. The process starts with a demand which is refused. Once you see that, all your arguments are exposed as the bullshit they are.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/29/2019 12:24PM by SumMo.

SumMo Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> I said that the courts settle it.
> That's your third branch settling the dispute.
> Your problem is that you projected your own lie
> onto my statement, rather than reading what I
> wrote.



Don't you know that the Senate created the US courts, including the SCOTUS and they can get rid of it any time they want. That's what the great muzzie scholar Gerry told us last week on this very web site. And he's never wrong.

SumMo is just an ignorant right-wing fuck without a clue on the world. Even his own posts confuse him.

LOL... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> SumMo is just an ignorant right-wing fuck without
> a clue on the world. Even his own posts confuse
> him.


LOL is just an ignorant left-wing fuck without a clue on the world. Even his own posts confuse him.

Wow, that’s what passes for clever in your little world? What a pathetic little dick!

LOL... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Wow, that’s what passes for clever in your
> little world? What a pathetic little dick!


That's why I quoted you; so that you would realize what a pathetic little dick you are for saying it. I'm glad to see that it worked.

You’re a dope. You’ve made that obvious for a long time. Foolishly re-confirming the fact only makes you look stupider.

And yet, I've brought to a standstill where you can't substantively answer any of my posts and are forced to use name calling and personal attacks in a failed effort to make yourself look smart. Your problem is that you have delusions of competence, but you aren't competent.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/29/2019 02:11PM by SumMo.

x



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/29/2019 02:11PM by SumMo.

Somebody doesn’t know the difference between executive privilege and contempt of Congress.