ATTENTION GERRYMANDERER and other lock-step liberal wastetoids:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/08/06/transparency-troubles-audit-finds-61b-gap-in-federal-spending-site/

The Obama administration failed to properly account for how it spent nearly $619 billion, according to a watchdog audit of the main federal website meant to track where taxpayer money is going.

The report from the Government Accountability Office picked apart the website USASpending.gov, and the agencies feeding information to it.

The database of government spending and contracts was created out of a 2006 transparency law >>THAT'S RIGHT, A GEORGE W BUSH SIGNED TRANSPARENCY LAW<<, but the GAO found it continues to have serious problems. The Department of Health and Human Services was the worst offender, during the 2012 period GAO examined.

619 BILLION... WE WASTE MORE THAN THE COUNTRY OF SWEDEN'S ANNUAL GDP !!

RE-POSTED SO YOUR LAZY SURFING A$$ WONT MISS IT...

bush lost over 2 trillion with same accounting staff

LouderThanHell Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ATTENTION GERRYMANDERER and other lock-step
> liberal wastetoids:
>
> http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/08/06/transpa
> rency-troubles-audit-finds-61b-gap-in-federal-spen
> ding-site/
>
> The Obama administration failed to properly
> account for how it spent nearly $619 billion,
> according to a watchdog audit of the main federal
> website meant to track where taxpayer money is
> going.
>
> The report from the Government Accountability
> Office picked apart the website USASpending.gov,
> and the agencies feeding information to it.
>
> The database of government spending and contracts
> was created out of a 2006 transparency law
> >>THAT'S RIGHT, A GEORGE W BUSH SIGNED
> TRANSPARENCY LAW<<, but the GAO found it continues
> to have serious problems. The Department of Health
> and Human Services was the worst offender, during
> the 2012 period GAO examined.
>
> 619 BILLION... WE WASTE MORE THAN THE COUNTRY OF
> SWEDEN'S ANNUAL GDP !!
>
> RE-POSTED SO YOUR LAZY SURFING A$$ WONT MISS IT...

The Obama administration could care less about accounting for money spent. It's not the administration's money. If I had access to all my neighbors' money, I wouldn't really care about accounting for how I spent it. I would just spend it and tell my neighbor to go to hell when he/she asked me about it.

http://www.webpronews.com/george-w-bush-a-better-president-than-obama-according-to-new-poll-2014-07
George W. Bush a Better President Than Obama, According to New Poll

http://www.dailyrecord.com/article/20120111/NJOPINION02/301110006/Admit-Bush-better-president-than-Obama

I checked the Bureau of Labor Statistics to see how well Obama was doing, using the unemployment rate as a barometer. During Bush's presidency from 2001 through 2008, the unemployment rate went from a low of 4.2 percent to 6.5 percent at the end of October 2008, when the housing and financial markets nosedived. During 84 of the entire 96 months of Bush's administration, unemployment rates were between 4.2 percent and 5.9 percent.

In December 2008, he left office with the rate at 7.3 percent. During 29 of the 36 months of the Obama administration, the unemployment rate has exceeded 9 percent, going as high as 10 percent. Obama also lost millions more jobs than Bush, because despite the millions he supposedly created, unemployment is just about double the rate of the Bush years.

Fox news, WebPro, and Daily Record

Sorry was stormfront not reporting any anti obummer news for you last night?



Yes the american people just love the heartless wonder and his boy wonder Dubya.

You guys are doing great. Echo chamber.

That picture's getting overused in just the past two days. Stale.

More bad news for Obomba Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> http://www.webpronews.com/george-w-bush-a-better-p
> resident-than-obama-according-to-new-poll-2014-07
> George W. Bush a Better President Than Obama,
> According to New Poll
>
> http://www.dailyrecord.com/article/20120111/NJOPIN
> ION02/301110006/Admit-Bush-better-president-than-O
> bama
>
> I checked the Bureau of Labor Statistics to see
> how well Obama was doing, using the unemployment
> rate as a barometer. During Bush's presidency from
> 2001 through 2008, the unemployment rate went from
> a low of 4.2 percent to 6.5 percent at the end of
> October 2008, when the housing and financial
> markets nosedived. During 84 of the entire 96
> months of Bush's administration, unemployment
> rates were between 4.2 percent and 5.9 percent.
>
> In December 2008, he left office with the rate at
> 7.3 percent. During 29 of the 36 months of the
> Obama administration, the unemployment rate has
> exceeded 9 percent, going as high as 10 percent.
> Obama also lost millions more jobs than Bush,
> because despite the millions he supposedly
> created, unemployment is just about double the
> rate of the Bush years.


Bush left office in January of 2009, not December of 2008, and the economy was in free fall. Do you really think Obama should have turned the economy around the instant he walked in the door? With what, magic? It took a while to get policies in place. The economy stabilized, and then started to improve by the end of 2009, less than a year into the administration. Employment growth has been moderate since then, and better than most other developed countries.
Attachments:

LouderThanHell Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ATTENTION GERRYMANDERER and other lock-step
> liberal wastetoids:
>
> http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/08/06/transpa
> rency-troubles-audit-finds-61b-gap-in-federal-spen
> ding-site/
>
> The Obama administration failed to properly
> account for how it spent nearly $619 billion,
> according to a watchdog audit of the main federal
> website meant to track where taxpayer money is
> going.
>
> The report from the Government Accountability
> Office picked apart the website USASpending.gov,
> and the agencies feeding information to it.
>
> The database of government spending and contracts
> was created out of a 2006 transparency law
> >>THAT'S RIGHT, A GEORGE W BUSH SIGNED
> TRANSPARENCY LAW<<, but the GAO found it continues
> to have serious problems. The Department of Health
> and Human Services was the worst offender, during
> the 2012 period GAO examined.
>
> 619 BILLION... WE WASTE MORE THAN THE COUNTRY OF
> SWEDEN'S ANNUAL GDP !!
>
> RE-POSTED SO YOUR LAZY SURFING A$$ WONT MISS IT...

This is dated 2014/08/06. Looks like some on this can't address current events.

Here ya go smartass "Links"

http://www.cbo.gov/publication/45555

From the CBO : Growing Deficits Over the Long Term Would Cause Federal Debt to Exceed 100 Percent of GDP by 2039

YES THAT IS RIGHT. THE FEDS WILL SOON SPEND MORE THAN EVERY SWINGING DICK IN AMERICA PRODUCES IN A YEAR. THEN CHINA WILL TAKE OVER...
Learn Mandarin now ...

SEE CHART : YOUR FEARLESS LEADER OBAMA IS SPENDING MORE ON THE FEDERAL CREDIT CARD THAN THEY DID DURING WORLD WAR II. BRILLIANT !!
Attachments:

hey Lvitp -- good post.

I think the date "2014/08/06" must have been back in 2006, right?

Jee whizz that is old, from the 2014th month in 2006. Wow.

> From the CBO : Growing Deficits Over the Long Term
> Would Cause Federal Debt to Exceed 100 Percent of
> GDP by 2039

THE CHART IS A DAMN LIE. WWII was underinflated not overinflated

USA LOANED OUT money and or gave money during WWII

(todays debt includes USA falling down in the list of top countries and owing - it includes domestic and global inflation)

CBO, GAO, OMB all are lying sacks of shit who suck at math and never intended to do any.

-----------------------republicans are suffering from $8T of democrats printing
their way into power. which used to come with a death
penalty mind you.

(8 10^12)/((256 10^6)/4

($125,000) per citizen owed by "our dear gov family yr 2000's"

Owed. is it any wonder law suits are demanding it ? not a single.

(per citizen that isn't a gov worker or is in a family of abusive
non-sharing gov workers or profiting largely off insider gov)
(legal citizens). a conservative est. of disparity yet appauling
before a real count.

busch and clinton began with debt and spent allot too: yes. to the
tune of $8 trillion more, 8x more, than than their predecessor ? NO

-------------------
it isn't $600 B thjey can't explain. it's NINE TRILLION DOLLARS they can't explain

YOUR OFF BY A MULTIPLE OF 15

what a damn coincidence. fed,state,county pay is 3x-15x what it was in the 1980's

THE CHART IS A DAMN LIE. WWII was underinflated not overinflated

USA was owed money after war

democrats hate math and create graphics to lie

if state and county gov.* weren't going wild the feds would be easily controlled

your problem is next door to you - not 2000 mi away

county gov have no term limit, are the ones that can get away with facism easiest, often ignore fed/state constitution, and their finances are less overseen

if you want WWII style european gov, overspendign and facism by gov, harassment of the public, and a blind eye to debt; that leads rapture of the continent

county gov

This thread makes me laugh.....

Once upon a time... the government had a vast scrap yard in the middle of A desert. Congress said, "someone may steal from it at night.." So they created a night watchman position and hired a person for the job..

Then Congress said, "How does the watchman do his job without instruction?" So they created a planning department and hired two people, one person to write the instructions, and one person to do time studies.

Then Congress said, "How will we know the night watchman is doing.

The tasks correctly?" So they created a Quality Control department and hired two people. One to do the studies and one to write the reports.

Then Congress said, "How are these people going to get paid?" So They created the following positions, a time keeper, and a payroll officer,

Then hired two people.

Then Congress said, "Who will be accountable for all of these people?" So they created an administrative section and hired three people, an Administrative Officer, Assistant Administrative Officer, and a Legal Secretary.

Then Congress said, "We have had this command in operation for one Year and we are $18,000 over budget, we must cutback overall cost."

So they laid off the ''night watchman.''

I'm from the govt and I'm here to help!
Attachments:

The Obama administration failed to properly account for how it spent nearly $619 billion, according to a watchdog audit of the main federal website meant to track where taxpayer money is going.

-----------------------
just to let you know

1) by ancient definition that's treason - becausae $619 Billion is more than enough to impoverish (with deaths) / destroy a whole town

2) by today's legal standard. there are ACCOUNTING RULES. #1 is that nothing is missing - always there is a receipt of who the money whent to

in the 2000's watchdogs began complaining that gov liability was not funded (ie, no insurance). WORSE. they complained that more and more accountants had no record of what was purchased with the money (why money was going out)

by feduciary law an accountant can be sued or imprisoned for having money go out and no receipts to show what for. HHS ? now congress would assume the fed agencies individually had those that record. by law if congress asks (even if they don't) they MUST have straight books

lastly. was the money well spent or were service charges stiff ? that part there is no clear accounting rules or law for. the books part no way - the books absolutely must be straight and in multiple, timely, authentic, copies

Let's get a full accounting of the NSA
Let's get reciets from the CIA
And all the money the gov handed out in Iraq, where did that go - speaking about camander funds