Incumbent Gerry Connolly has raised $1,340,985.80 and has spent $518,523.79.

Gerry's GOP-tard challenger, Suzanne Scholte, has raised just $57,421 and has spent $18,238.66.

Is this how pathetically uncompetitive GOP-tards are in the VA-11th?

Conserva-tards!

LoLz!

Conserva-tards! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Incumbent Gerry Connolly has raised $1,340,985.80
> and has spent $518,523.79.
>
> Gerry's GOP-tard challenger, Suzanne Scholte, has
> raised just $57,421 and has spent $18,238.66.
>
> Is this how pathetically uncompetitive GOP-tards
> are in the VA-11th?
>
> Conserva-tards!
>
> LoLz!

Then vote for her and make it competitive or STFU.

I want to be like Hilary - poor lol! Thank god for crony capitalism and all the money the govt contractors and union shake down artist gave me! God bless the USSA!

And Gerald Connolly has the added advantage that Fairfax Cross Country Trail is named in his honor, The Nancy Pelosi's Lapdog Way.

I just hope if he makes his way to it, that avoids hitting and running any joggers or bicyclists.

And buy his book, "How to Get Rich Off Taxpayers."

Here is a Joke for you:

Q: A liberal and a moderate republican walk into a bar...what does the liberal say to the moderate?

A: Hey can you pay for me because I'm FUCKING POOR, UNEMPLOYED, and STUPID!



Ahh, I love that one such a classic

P0verty Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Here is a Joke for you:
>
> Q: A liberal and a moderate republican walk into a
> bar...what does the liberal say to the moderate?
>
> A: Hey can you pay for me because I'm FUCKING
> POOR, UNEMPLOYED, and STUPID!
>
>
>
> Ahh, I love that one such a classic


Does this poster realize that liberals are far wealthier than repubs?

Your base is the poorest parts of the country, backward ass white trash southerners.

Oh, the irony is just wonderful.

If anyone would like to get a load of a youthful Gerald's adult film career, I believe "Suckling the Teet of Power" is still available in Beta.

retardz

Goat fucke-tardz

Hillary Clinton would also have contributed but lacked the financial resources, since she is not "truly well off."

nuyPc Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> P0verty Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Here is a Joke for you:
> >
> > Q: A liberal and a moderate republican walk into
> a
> > bar...what does the liberal say to the moderate?
>
> >
> > A: Hey can you pay for me because I'm FUCKING
> > POOR, UNEMPLOYED, and STUPID!
> >
> >
> >
> > Ahh, I love that one such a classic
>
>
> Does this poster realize that liberals are far
> wealthier than repubs?
>
> Your base is the poorest parts of the country,
> backward ass white trash southerners.
>
> Oh, the irony is just wonderful.


Incorrect by virtually any source or measure.



-

Quote

Financially, Republicans fare better than either Democrats or Independents, and tend to identify themselves as such. Republican candidates gain a significantly higher percentage of votes from individuals with incomes over $50,000 per year, and the advantage increases along with the income level, to a height of 63 percent of individuals earning $200,000 or more a year supporting Republicans. This level is the direct inverse of individuals earning less than $15,000 a year, who support Democrats at 63 percent and Republicans at only 36 percent.

http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/research/published/ssqfinal.pdf

Among many others.

What you're probably trying to dredge up is the dumb red state vs blue state talking point crap. In that case, the poor "backward ass white" southerners which you mention actually are primarily poor rural black southerners.

Retardz

you F Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Retardz

That is just the kind of witty retort I would expect from a Connolly supporter.

Also, I guess you don't have anyone who's mentally handicapped in your family. Then you might feel some of the pain that such language can cause.

Question: Will Gerald Connolly make as much during his career in "public service" as Harry Reid and his family, which has raked in tens of millions of dollars, perhaps more, feeding at the public trough?

Connolly may have money, but any opponent would not have the disadvantage of having served as the towel boy for the worst president in the history of the nation and Nancy Pelosi, who may no longer possess any sanity.

Hopeful Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Connolly may have money, but any opponent would
> not have the disadvantage of having served as the
> towel boy for the worst president in the history
> of the nation and Nancy Pelosi, who may no longer
> possess any sanity.

Gerry has outraise his opponent 28:1 and outspent her 23:1.

I see what you mean about his being at a 'disadvantage'.

Conserva-tards!

LoLz!