I was near the old court house and when gerry connolly passed by people started yelling LOWER MY TAXES, SOCIALIST, When the Dems passed by again Someone started yelling SOCIALIST, LOWER MY TAXES, BOOOO, AND the Republicans got a starting O. The dems have no change of winning the election this November or ever again.

Lol, you're basing this on the dozen or so people who were gathered in one area?

Cool story bro, did you ask them how many illegal immigrants they have working for them?

Yeah, that sounds like your typical childish conservitard behavior. Taking a family event, celebrating the birth of our nation and ruining it with a bunch of heckling from the peanut gallery.

Well, I'm disappointed...

I read that as big booobs.

The Insane Party of Hatred stars again - it's not what you're for, it's what you're against!

A real winning strategy, yessiree!

Reality: Conservative's Enemy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Yeah, that sounds like your typical childish
> conservitard behavior. Taking a family event,
> celebrating the birth of our nation and ruining it
> with a bunch of heckling from the peanut gallery.

Yeah leave the heckling to the experts, the democrats.

Was the Weasel there?

free stuff for all illegals Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Was the Weasel there?


Uncle Gerry was there.

The Weasel probably thought they were say Boo-urns

Loved this exchange:

"Hey, Terry, Why should we vote for you?"

"Because the other guy is so bad!"

Wow.

I wonder what free stuff is left for democrats to give out. There is already free housing, free medical, free dental, welfare checks, free food stamps, free college, free cell phones and amnesty for those who snuck into the country. In some states they even give those on welfare a used car.

Gotta love me!
Attachments:

Funny Terry Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Loved this exchange:
>
> "Hey, Terry, Why should we vote for you?"
>
> "Because the other guy is so bad!"
>
> Wow.

Works for me.

Yeah, this is typical Republican behavior. You either agree with them across the board, or you must be evil, and they don't feel any need to show any decorum.

You'll find examples all over this forum.

It's the "World is About Me" Party. Get used to it.

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/first-lady-michelle-obama-booed-at-nascar-race/

There's a party later, a "Tea" Party. Illegals, Dems, and liberals need not come.

How It Is Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Yeah, this is typical Republican behavior. You
> either agree with them across the board, or you
> must be evil, and they don't feel any need to show
> any decorum.
>
> You'll find examples all over this forum.
>
> It's the "World is About Me" Party. Get used to
> it.
>
> http://www.mediaite.com/tv/first-lady-michelle-oba
> ma-booed-at-nascar-race/


Sorry, chucklehead, Dems have been booing and making asses of themselves for years. Liberal tolerance only extends to those that share their same warped view of the world.

http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?v=9jgYAvqKrgM&desktop_uri=%2Fwatch%3Fv%3D9jgYAvqKrgM

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/03/30/president-bush-booed-at-b_n_94153.html


In fact, Dem party leaders set the example for you simpletons to follow...

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2009/09/10/flashback_democrats_boo_bush_at_2005_state_of_the_union.html

What's the matter? You can dish it out but can't take it?

I agree that it is in poor taste to boo an elected official, but Dems are hardly innocent when it comes to showing poor taste.

Top 10 Funny Political Moments
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=HMdRUZFGojk

look around Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> How It Is Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Yeah, this is typical Republican behavior. You
> > either agree with them across the board, or you
> > must be evil, and they don't feel any need to
> show
> > any decorum.
> >
> > You'll find examples all over this forum.
> >
> > It's the "World is About Me" Party. Get used
> to
> > it.
> >
> >
> http://www.mediaite.com/tv/first-lady-michelle-oba
>
> > ma-booed-at-nascar-race/
>
>
> Sorry, chucklehead, Dems have been booing and
> making asses of themselves for years. Liberal
> tolerance only extends to those that share their
> same warped view of the world.
>
> http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?v=9jgYAvqKrgM&desktop
> _uri=%2Fwatch%3Fv%3D9jgYAvqKrgM
>
> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/03/30/president
> -bush-booed-at-b_n_94153.html
>
>
> In fact, Dem party leaders set the example for you
> simpletons to follow...
>
> http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2009/09/10/
> flashback_democrats_boo_bush_at_2005_state_of_the_
> union.html
>
> What's the matter? You can dish it out but can't
> take it?
>
> I agree that it is in poor taste to boo an elected
> official, but Dems are hardly innocent when it
> comes to showing poor taste.

I'm not going to say that Democrats are perfect. Some of them are capable of being just as tasteless.

Keep in mind that in 2009, even the Republicans had realized that they re-elected a complete idiot whos damaging legacy continues to this day. And unlike NASCAR, Baseball doesn't have a "clear majority demographic".

And consider that Michelle Obama and Jill Biden are NOT elected officials. They were both at the NASCAR even to promote a project to support military families.

As I recall, there was also some backlash within the Democrat party for the State of the Union booing, as there should have been.

Yes, because breaking out into a chorus of "Hail Satan" is so classy and uptown.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 07/04/2013 06:29PM by RangerRikki.

I was saying Boo-urns

RangerRikki Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Yes, because breaking out into a chorus of "Hail
> Satan" is so classy and uptown.

Though I think that was ridiculously thoughtless of the few who purportedly did it (*), there literally is no difference between that and praising the Lord by the folks they were responding to.

=========

(*) It was a ridiculously thoughtless thing to do (nee stupid) because, as you can see, JUST that is a topic of discussion now rather than the IMPORTANT stuff.

8 More Years, II Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Though I think that was ridiculously thoughtless
> of the few who purportedly did it (*), there
> literally is no difference between that and
> praising the Lord by the folks they were
> responding to.

I see your point, but I disagree. "Praise the Lord" came from people who don't recognize that others have beliefs that can be different but just as legitimate. "Hail Satan" was solely for the sake of antagonizing the first group, and almost certainly not a reflection of their real beliefs.

I haven't researched that particular incident - it was just pathetic and childish - but I'm betting it was initiated after people in that second group had been called or compared to Satanists a few times.

I was at the parade and the Dems had a bigger turnout than the GOP. They seemed to push clean energy and the LGBT agenda as well as their individual candidates. I am a tea party-leaning GDI and no fan the current slate of Dems; I will probably hold my nose and vote for the Cooch in November. That said - - and realizing this is just FFX - - I have to admit the Dems looked better organized and more confident than the GOP did today.

SelousScout Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I was at the parade and the Dems had a bigger
> turnout than the GOP. They seemed to push clean
> energy and the LGBT agenda as well as their
> individual candidates. I am a tea party-leaning
> GDI and no fan the current slate of Dems; I will
> probably hold my nose and vote for the Cooch in
> November. That said - - and realizing this is just
> FFX - - I have to admit the Dems looked better
> organized and more confident than the GOP did
> today.

They probably are better organized, they have to be. They never run on the issues and always just have bs social issues instead of things that matter so they have to have that organization and political machine to even have a chance.

Plus like you said its Fairfax County so its no surprise they have a stronger power base here.

Who could bring themselves to cheer for the Weasel. Maybe illegals and those on welfare and the brain dead libs.

Liberal Logic 15 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> They probably are better organized, they have to
> be. They never run on the issues and always just
> have bs social issues instead of things that
> matter...

You are such a tool. BS social issues? Not if you're female, gay, or a minority. Maybe as an old white guy these things don't matter to you, but these are 'the things that matter' to a lot of people. Social issues wouldn't be an issue if you repressed sick bastards didn't make them your primary platform. Get the fuck out of other people's personal lives if you want to regain any semblance of credibility.

Not you Again Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Liberal Logic 15 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > They probably are better organized, they have
> to
> > be. They never run on the issues and always
> just
> > have bs social issues instead of things that
> > matter...
>
> You are such a tool. BS social issues? Not if
> you're female, gay, or a minority. Maybe as an old
> white guy these things don't matter to you, but
> these are 'the things that matter' to a lot of
> people. Social issues wouldn't be an issue if you
> repressed sick bastards didn't make them your
> primary platform. Get the fuck out of other
> people's personal lives if you want to regain any
> semblance of credibility.


Deviant sex and killing unborn babies. Now there's a platform everyone should be able to get behind! Moron

Republicans got a standing O? Where the hell was anyone sitting you dumbfuck.

human sheep Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Not you Again Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Liberal Logic 15 Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > They probably are better organized, they have
> > to
> > > be. They never run on the issues and always
> > just
> > > have bs social issues instead of things that
> > > matter...
> >
> > You are such a tool. BS social issues? Not if
> > you're female, gay, or a minority. Maybe as an
> old
> > white guy these things don't matter to you, but
> > these are 'the things that matter' to a lot of
> > people. Social issues wouldn't be an issue if
> you
> > repressed sick bastards didn't make them your
> > primary platform. Get the fuck out of other
> > people's personal lives if you want to regain
> any
> > semblance of credibility.
>
>
> Deviant sex and killing unborn babies. Now
> there's a platform everyone should be able to get
> behind! Moron

I guess of anyone knows about deviant sex it would be all the closeted fags in the GOP

I was near the corner of Armstrong and University and there was pretty much silence for the Dems (as it should be) and pointing at the gay pride rainbow many of them carried (that didn't get well received) and then Cucinelli got a warm but not loud reception most said nice things to him as he shook loads of hands. Booing is a waste of good noise!!!

Homos Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> human sheep Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Not you Again Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Liberal Logic 15 Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > They probably are better organized, they
> have
> > > to
> > > > be. They never run on the issues and
> always
> > > just
> > > > have bs social issues instead of things
> that
> > > > matter...
> > >
> > > You are such a tool. BS social issues? Not if
> > > you're female, gay, or a minority. Maybe as
> an
> > old
> > > white guy these things don't matter to you,
> but
> > > these are 'the things that matter' to a lot
> of
> > > people. Social issues wouldn't be an issue if
> > you
> > > repressed sick bastards didn't make them your
> > > primary platform. Get the fuck out of other
> > > people's personal lives if you want to regain
> > any
> > > semblance of credibility.
> >
> >
> > Deviant sex and killing unborn babies. Now
> > there's a platform everyone should be able to
> get
> > behind! Moron
>
> I guess of anyone knows about deviant sex it would
> be all the closeted fags in the GOP


Yep, can't disagree. Whether closeted or an out-n-the-open flamer, deviant sex is deviant sex. And fags are fags.

Not you Again Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Liberal Logic 15 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > They probably are better organized, they have
> to
> > be. They never run on the issues and always
> just
> > have bs social issues instead of things that
> > matter...
>
> You are such a tool. BS social issues? Not if
> you're female, gay, or a minority. Maybe as an old
> white guy these things don't matter to you, but
> these are 'the things that matter' to a lot of
> people. Social issues wouldn't be an issue if you
> repressed sick bastards didn't make them your
> primary platform. Get the fuck out of other
> people's personal lives if you want to regain any
> semblance of credibility.

More bullshit. The only one you can possibly say is gay marriage when they just want to change the name anyway.

Like I said all you can do is create fake hysteria about bullshit social issues because an intelligent conversation is just asking for too much.

I hope the Weasel enjoyed the boos, and that McAuliffe aka Bill Clinton's best friend heard plenty of them also. These libtards are ruining Virginia, and turning it into the next Maryland.

The silence that greeted the Republicans coming down University Drive was amazing. Not a sound. Cuccinelli sprinted down the street past us so he wouldn't have to be part of it. The Republican Party, solely composed of older white Christian hetero rich socially conservative men, is slowly driving itself into extinction. Enjoy!

Tough One Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> These libtards are ruining
> Virginia, and turning it into the next Maryland.

These conservatives are ruining Virginia, and turning it into the next Alabama.

Tax Payer Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I was near the old court house and when gerry
> connolly passed by people started yelling LOWER MY
> TAXES, SOCIALIST, When the Dems passed by again
> Someone started yelling SOCIALIST, LOWER MY TAXES,
> BOOOO, AND the Republicans got a starting O. The
> dems have no change of winning the election this
> November or ever again.

Not sure where exactly you were. The only boos I heard were for the GOP idiots in the parade. I heard alot of people also yelling "Thanks for the drop in the US credit rating, where is the jobs plans, Palin sucks ass, lower our taxes when? Boehner is bonehead!"

Fixed It Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Tough One Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > These libtards are ruining
> > Virginia, and turning it into the next
> Maryland.
>
> These conservatives are ruining Virginia, and
> turning it into the next Alabama.

+100

So sick of their 5th grade Mississippi swamp educations and attitudes.

How could OP tell if they were Dems or the American Communist Party - or did they merge?

Tax Payer Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I was near the old court house and when gerry
> connolly passed by people started yelling LOWER MY
> TAXES, SOCIALIST, When the Dems passed by again
> Someone started yelling SOCIALIST, LOWER MY TAXES,
> BOOOO, AND the Republicans got a starting O. The
> dems have no change of winning the election this
> November or ever again.


Is this fantasy shit that republicans say to make themselves feel better about their overall general worthlessness. I find the louder and more shrill a group is, the less people listen or take them seriously. Now back to furiously fapping with the softcore leg show known as FoxNews...mmmmm...Andrea Tantaros you hot slut!

Undertoad Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Tax Payer Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I was near the old court house and when gerry
> > connolly passed by people started yelling LOWER
> MY
> > TAXES, SOCIALIST, When the Dems passed by again
> > Someone started yelling SOCIALIST, LOWER MY
> TAXES,
> > BOOOO, AND the Republicans got a starting O.
> The
> > dems have no change of winning the election
> this
> > November or ever again.
>
>
> Is this fantasy shit that republicans say to make
> themselves feel better about their overall general
> worthlessness. I find the louder and more shrill
> a group is, the less people listen or take them
> seriously. Now back to furiously fapping with the
> softcore leg show known as
> FoxNews...mmmmm...Andrea Tantaros you hot slut!

Yup, these are the same clowns who told us that Obama would NEVER get re-elected, that's why Karl Rove shit his underwear election night. Dumb-asses.

"How could OP tell if they were Dems or the American Communist Party - or did they merge?"

ahh, a question posed so eloquently by a confederate flag-waving member of the christian-taliban mysogynistic xenophobic kkk limbaugh ass-kissing hannity-cocksucking cuccinelli-worshiping freedom-hating ignorance-embracing white-supremist nazi-sympathizing conservative republican party.

10 more years and all you right-wingers will have all the political clout of Paula Deen at the BET awards.

skeptical at best Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> "How could OP tell if they were Dems or the
> American Communist Party - or did they merge?"
>
> ahh, a question posed so eloquently by a
> confederate flag-waving member of the
> christian-taliban mysogynistic xenophobic kkk
> limbaugh ass-kissing hannity-cocksucking
> cuccinelli-worshiping freedom-hating
> ignorance-embracing white-supremist
> nazi-sympathizing conservative republican party.
>
>
> 10 more years and all you right-wingers will have
> all the political clout of Paula Deen at the BET
> awards.

Love it! So true.

Undertoad, Blue Virginia, skeptical at best, Ha!!! and others are all the same person.

What's the matter? Missing your 1:00 nap time today?

IPs Tell No Lies Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Undertoad, Blue Virginia, skeptical at best, Ha!!!
> and others are all the same person.
>
> What's the matter? Missing your 1:00 nap time
> today?

Ferfux gets really whinny during his period.

IPs Tell No Lies Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Undertoad, Blue Virginia, skeptical at best, Ha!!!
> and others are all the same person.
>
> What's the matter? Missing your 1:00 nap time
> today?

You're full of shit. You nuts just can't accept that there is more than one liberal on FFXU. Here's how to tell the difference between conservatives and liberals on here - liberals approach a subject with with wit and irony, conservatives think that nap and menstruation jokes are hilarious.

> > Undertoad, Blue Virginia, skeptical at best, wrote:

>
> You're full of shit.

Unlike you, because you filled your diaper at the end of nappy time.

Now hop in your stroller and we can take a nice walk down the Gerry trail.

Let's move this shit to Arlington, and see what happens there.

Ha!!! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> IPs Tell No Lies Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Undertoad, Blue Virginia, skeptical at best,
> Ha!!!
> > and others are all the same person.
> >
> > What's the matter? Missing your 1:00 nap time
> > today?
>
> You're full of shit. You nuts just can't accept
> that there is more than one liberal on FFXU.
> Here's how to tell the difference between
> conservatives and liberals on here - liberals
> approach a subject with with wit and irony,
> conservatives think that nap and menstruation
> jokes are hilarious.

Lol thats funny thanks for the laugh.

The ultra liberals posting the crap you did above just post with hatred and parroting each other showing a complete lack of independent thought.

When the conservatives finally become extinct who will pay for your welfare, food stamps, obamacare and obamaphones. The Chinese sure as hell aren't going to extend anymore credit.

"The ultra liberals posting the crap you did above just post with hatred..."

The root of hatred is in those that preach and manipulate, legislate and congregate to deny equal rights and opportunities for each and every American citizen. The Republican Party has for decades oppressed, insulted and continues to legislate against women, homosexuals, people of color, immigrants and minority religions. After having lived with this oppressive and duplicitous political and social atmosphere for too long, those so affected have finally risen up to say, "enough -this will END!". -and the Republican response... "hey, hey HEY! Why so much HATE?!"
Wake up...the "Mitch McConnell America" is over. So indulge yourself and continue to use that silly term, "libtard", open a bag of fried pork rinds, and plop yourself in front of your TV for an intellectually stimulating episode of "Here Comes Honey Boo Boo".
While your brain bloats from hate and your mind rots from bile the rest of America is moving progressively forward to finally become the country promised us in 1776. No more subclass citizens, no more discrimination, no more legal basis to protect your hate.
While the citizens of Eqypt are dying for the rebirth and preservation of their democracy, how ironic that Republicans in America are hellbent on preserving oppression here at home.
Wake up "Liberal Logic 15" -you are on the wrong side of history or perhaps simply in the wrong country for your content.

8 More Years, II Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The Insane Party of Hatred stars again - it's not
> what you're for, it's what you're against!
>
> A real winning strategy, yessiree!


Such a teenie weenie

I dreamt this during my 1pm nap Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> "The ultra liberals posting the crap you did above
> just post with hatred..."
>
> The root of hatred is in those that preach and
> manipulate, legislate and congregate to deny equal
> rights and opportunities for each and every
> American citizen. The Republican Party has for
> decades oppressed, insulted and continues to
> legislate against women, homosexuals, people of
> color, immigrants and minority religions. After
> having lived with this oppressive and duplicitous
> political and social atmosphere for too long,
> those so affected have finally risen up to say,
> "enough -this will END!". -and the Republican
> response... "hey, hey HEY! Why so much HATE?!"
> Wake up...the "Mitch McConnell America" is over.
> So indulge yourself and continue to use that silly
> term, "libtard", open a bag of fried pork rinds,
> and plop yourself in front of your TV for an
> intellectually stimulating episode of "Here Comes
> Honey Boo Boo".
> While your brain bloats from hate and your mind
> rots from bile the rest of America is moving
> progressively forward to finally become the
> country promised us in 1776. No more subclass
> citizens, no more discrimination, no more legal
> basis to protect your hate.
> While the citizens of Eqypt are dying for the
> rebirth and preservation of their democracy, how
> ironic that Republicans in America are hellbent on
> preserving oppression here at home.
> Wake up "Liberal Logic 15" -you are on the wrong
> side of history or perhaps simply in the wrong
> country for your content.

Yea it was disgusting during the civil rights movement when the gop fought for segregation and provided 80 percent of the no votes to the 1964 civil rights act and had a kkk member during the 2000s, oh crap my fault it was the Dems who did all that.

You can say all the bullshit you want, it remains just that bullshit. You cant rewrite history to fit the lies youre trying to sell

Congrats, 'Liberal Logic 15'...your twisted, anachronistic, irrelevant, Hannity/Limbaugh-infused comment has changed zero minds. You know you're wrong. Be a good little Palin and give up. We laugh at your imbecillic ravings.

Now it's after dark...isn't there a cross-burning you should be attending?

git along little donkey Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Congrats, 'Liberal Logic 15'...your twisted,
> anachronistic, irrelevant,
> Hannity/Limbaugh-infused comment has changed zero
> minds. You know you're wrong. Be a good little
> Palin and give up. We laugh at your imbecillic
> ravings.
>
> Now it's after dark...isn't there a cross-burning
> you should be attending?

Facts dont lie. Keep up the good fight to brain wash everyone to try and forget about those things though.

AWW must have hit a nerve poor baby registered my name

All these vicious Libs must wish they could've been Bolsheviks in 1917 Russia or could've joined Mao in China to further the cultural revolution. They all sound like hardcore commies hellbent on destroying everything in their path.

Is that the best you can do? Dredging up 50 year old history to prove that Southern rednecks were racists, irrespective of party (Robert Byrd - shudder)? Tell me something I don't know.

You people would be right at home in the South of the 50s, since your viewpoint hasn't evolved since then. You are an anachronism, and your kind is dying out.

You are actually trying to peddle the idea that the Republican Party favors inclusion. Have you no sense of decency? Have you no shame?

You=Dying Breed Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Is that the best you can do? Dredging up 50 year
> old history to prove that Southern rednecks were
> racists, irrespective of party (Robert Byrd -
> shudder)? Tell me something I don't know.
>
> You people would be right at home in the South of
> the 50s, since your viewpoint hasn't evolved since
> then. You are an anachronism, and your kind is
> dying out.
>
> You are actually trying to peddle the idea that
> the Republican Party favors inclusion. Have you no
> sense of decency? Have you no shame?

Blah Blah Blah keep pushing those talking points like a good lib.

Yea just dismiss the fact that dems were on the wrong side of the civil rights movement and had a KKK member just a few years ago like its no big deal.

Im sorry we dont suscribe to your modern form of slavery wanted blacks dependent on the government because they cant take care of themselves right comrade?

Dems never learn from history and want you to ignore history as well. Otherwise, no one would ever vote for them and their insane policies. Cuba, North Korea, Venezuela. The socialist Greece , Spain, and Italian economies. The National Socialists of Germany. Every city in the USA run for decades by Dems. Obamacare.

Why are Libs unable to learn? Are they all braindead zombies?

Liberal Logic 14 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Yea just dismiss the fact that dems were on the
> wrong side of the civil rights movement.

I guess it depends what you consider to be "the wrong side".

You might want to look up "Southern Strategy" before you insist on sounding as stupid as Rand Paul.

The GOP will be making some changes in the coming years - they'll have to in order to avoid complete irrelevance. In fact, they're already beginning to court the Latino vote. It'll be fun to watch them try to pull this off without alienating the core rascist demographic that's kept them homogenous for so long.

Liberal Facts 15 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> I guess it depends what you consider to be "the
> wrong side".
>
> You might want to look up "Southern Strategy"
> before you insist on sounding as stupid as Rand
> Paul.
>

Yes, you should:

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/10/magazine/10Section2b.t-4.html?_r=0

http://www.claremont.org/publications/crb/id.928/article_detail.asp

Manipulated but too dumb to know Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Liberal Facts 15 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > I guess it depends what you consider to be "the
> > wrong side".
> >
> > You might want to look up "Southern Strategy"
> > before you insist on sounding as stupid as Rand
> > Paul.
> >
>
> Yes, you should:
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/10/magazine/10Secti
> on2b.t-4.html?_r=0

So, two guys did a "study", and in their polls, nobody said "I voted that way because I'm a racist."

> http://www.claremont.org/publications/crb/id.928/a
> rticle_detail.asp

This one actually makes an interesting argument, and I will honestly give it some thought. As of now, I'm far from convinced that this isn't revisionism for the party's sake, but I'm open-minded, and my perceptions can be changed.

Regarding the "new strategy": I somewhat suspect that Herman Cain was simply an attempt to alter the image of the party. He was far too insane to be elected, but he did broadcast the message to potential black voters that the GOP was willing to embrace African Americans while leaving the safety-net of knowing that he would never actually carry the party's nomination. Calling attention to his insanity even gave some Conservatives the chance to level charges of racism against the media and any Democrat critics (even though that made no sense at all, since if they were anti-Cain, they must be pro-Obama).

Again, it will be interesting to watch this evolve. I wonder why it wasn't until the last decade that the GOP showed any interest at all in distancing themselves from the perception of racism? And now that the interest exists, it's fascinating to see 50 years of history being recharacterized in a different light.

Liberal Facts 15 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Liberal Logic 14 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Yea just dismiss the fact that dems were on the
> > wrong side of the civil rights movement.
>
> I guess it depends what you consider to be "the
> wrong side".
>
> You might want to look up "Southern Strategy"
> before you insist on sounding as stupid as Rand
> Paul.


Ah yes yet another attempt to rewrite history to cover the fact that the democratic racism was exposed.

But please go on with the talking point fallacies.

Id honestly love to hear your entire recount of history Im sure itd be absolutely hysterical what would come out of your mouth.

Liberal Logic 14 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Liberal Facts 15 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Liberal Logic 14 Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Yea just dismiss the fact that dems were on
> the
> > > wrong side of the civil rights movement.
> >
> > I guess it depends what you consider to be "the
> > wrong side".
> >
> > You might want to look up "Southern Strategy"
> > before you insist on sounding as stupid as Rand
> > Paul.
>
>
> Ah yes yet another attempt to rewrite history to
> cover the fact that the democratic racism was
> exposed.
>
> But please go on with the talking point fallacies.
>
>
> Id honestly love to hear your entire recount of
> history Im sure itd be absolutely hysterical what
> would come out of your mouth.

So much for intelligent debate. I guess I'd be right to feel stupid to think that there might actually be some dialog.

The socialist dems should be as welcome here as the German National Socialists would be welcomed in Israel.

Rabbi Steinman Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The socialist dems should be as welcome here as
> the German National Socialists would be welcomed
> in Israel.

I think that this (and other posts on this thread) are among the reasons that I know more "anti-Republicans" than actual Democrats.

Now I'm sorry I missed the parade this year.

Liberal Facts 15 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> So much for intelligent debate. I guess I'd be
> right to feel stupid to think that there might
> actually be some dialog.


Hahhaha Intelligent debate are you kidding me?

You start out with bullshit hyperbole about how the GOP hates women and blacks, then move on to calling Herman Cain a token black guy and now youre talking about intelligent debate?

If you think what youre doing is intelligent then youre too stupid for youre own good.

Hyperbole talking point sensationalism is when the dumbest people in the room do, do far youre showing no matter how large or small the room is you would be in the group.

Don't forget the name calling. The surest sign that a lib has capitulated in his argument is when he starts name calling with terms like teabagger, bigot, repubik, rethugrican, and many others that escape me on this hot ass day.

Tray von Martin Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Don't forget the name calling. The surest sign
> that a lib has capitulated in his argument is when
> he starts name calling with terms like teabagger,
> bigot, repubik, rethugrican, and many others that
> escape me on this hot ass day.


Really? Have you ever heard your side? You don't know the definition of socialism much less how to use it as an insult.

No wonder everyone hates your candidates, republitards. You guys are the biggest little pansy butt hurts on earth. Wah wah wah

Get off the federal teet and get the fuck out, go live in Alabama and shut the fuck up in your backwater hell hole

Socialism IS an insult.

Pathetic butthurts Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> No wonder everyone hates your candidates,
> republitards. You guys are the biggest little
> pansy butt hurts on earth. Wah wah wah


You sounds really smart........

Liberal Logic 14 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Liberal Facts 15 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > So much for intelligent debate. I guess I'd be
> > right to feel stupid to think that there might
> > actually be some dialog.
>
>
> Hahhaha Intelligent debate are you kidding me?
>
> You start out with bullshit hyperbole about how
> the GOP hates women and blacks, then move on to
> calling Herman Cain a token black guy and now
> youre talking about intelligent debate?
>
> If you think what youre doing is intelligent then
> youre too stupid for youre own good.
>
> Hyperbole talking point sensationalism is when the
> dumbest people in the room do, do far youre
> showing no matter how large or small the room is
> you would be in the group.

First, I said "rascist"... I never said "women and blacks", though it's pretty clear where you all stand on issues that are important to most women.

Second, I said I SUSPECTED that Cain was put out for that purpose. Nothing else really seems to make sense, because he was in no way electable.

Third, I threw out the "Southern Strategy" which is largely regarded as fact, and acknowledged an intelligent argument.

I can name ONE black Republican in the past 20 years who might've been able to actually win enough crossover votes to gain the White House, and he was clearly knee-capped by the Bush administration when he stood in front of the world with photos of WMDs that didn't exist. Rice also suffered the same fate. Coincidence?

Liberal Facts 15 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> First, I said "rascist"... I never said "women and
> blacks", though it's pretty clear where you all
> stand on issues that are important to most women.

No you clearly said women as well. Murdering babies isnt important to most women. Its important to some women and a lot of effeminate liberal males. A large number of women have morals and would never do such a thing.

> Second, I said I SUSPECTED that Cain was put out
> for that purpose. Nothing else really seems to
> make sense, because he was in no way electable.

Rights master a black man could never done do that on his own.


Youre an idiot, its a primary anyone can run. I know its really hard to fathom a black man doing something other than taking a check but anyone can run. Hes a very successful businessman which is something we could use right now and he got support which kept him in the race for a while.

Hes not the token black guy you want to portray him as.

> Third, I threw out the "Southern Strategy" which
> is largely regarded as fact, and acknowledged an
> intelligent argument.

Yes its regarded as fact in liberal circles who are trying to cover their tracks about how theyre the ones who have been pushing segregation and slavery all this time. Funny how you never hear about how the KKK was a political tool of the dems.

Southern strategy is nothing more than a bunch of progressive bullshit

> I can name ONE black Republican in the past 20
> years who might've been able to actually win
> enough crossover votes to gain the White House,
> and he was clearly knee-capped by the Bush
> administration when he stood in front of the world
> with photos of WMDs that didn't exist. Rice also
> suffered the same fate. Coincidence?

Colin Powell is a complete joke. He should have never had the position he had in the first place and had very little respect within the military itself. The fact that hes not a hardcore dem just because of a black candidate says all you need to know about the man.

With that said you are a complete idiot trying to imply that it was some world wide plot to discredit a black man.

So what weve learned here is that you are in fact a complete idiot. You really dont have much of a clue about anything, but you are good a pushing talking points.

We also learned thats its hard for you to comprehend how Cain could do something because hes black, and you even lie about what you said even though its in the lines above you.

Like I said this is the biggest joke of "intelligent conversation". If think youre coming up with some high brow brain busters then wow.

"hard for you to comprehend how Cain could do something because hes black"

No, it's hard to comprehend because he's INSANE.

Liberal Logic 14 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Pathetic butthurts Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > No wonder everyone hates your candidates,
> > republitards. You guys are the biggest little
> > pansy butt hurts on earth. Wah wah wah
>
>
> You sounds really smart........

You sound like a faggot pencil necked dweeb that everyone hated in highschool and remains a douche thinking they are superior to anyone when everyone else in society thinks of them as the bottom of the totem pole. And by faggot I mean nuisance not like you bigots mean to be derogatory towards homosexuals.

You sir are a huge, huge faggot

Liberal Facts 15 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Third, I threw out the "Southern Strategy" which
> is largely regarded as fact, and acknowledged an
> intelligent argument.
>

No, it's not fact. It's propaganda that you got suckered into believing. There is a ton of stuff out there which shoots down the whole myth and provides the origin as a Dem talking point. I gave you a few examples. Lots more if you want to look. The only people who believe it as "fact" are those who are too dumb, lazy, or brainwashed to look.

Fooled You Twice, Shame on You Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Liberal Facts 15 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > Third, I threw out the "Southern Strategy"
> which
> > is largely regarded as fact, and acknowledged
> an
> > intelligent argument.
> >
>
> No, it's not fact. It's propaganda that you got
> suckered into believing. There is a ton of stuff
> out there which shoots down the whole myth and
> provides the origin as a Dem talking point. I
> gave you a few examples. Lots more if you want to
> look. The only people who believe it as "fact"
> are those who are too dumb, lazy, or brainwashed
> to look.

Cause Fox and some right-wing groups say so... yeah.

It's your unflinching willingness to believe anything that fits your agenda, without question, and your immediate jump to personal insults because you don't have anything to say that have made me realize that even if one or two of your points are right that your party is dangerous.

Looking at the whole package, even if you erase the racism which you yourself spew, it's not hard to draw the conclusion that if the Republicans gain any power at all, it will be Murdoch and his interests that run this country, and not an electorate with any willingness to stray from party lines.

24 hours ago, I was actually considering some of the points. Since then, you've pretty well cemented my beliefs that continuing to stand against your party is the single most effective use of my vote.

Go ahead, throw some more insults. Call me stupid. Show us your real colors.

Faggot says what? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Liberal Logic 14 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Pathetic butthurts Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > No wonder everyone hates your candidates,
> > > republitards. You guys are the biggest little
> > > pansy butt hurts on earth. Wah wah wah
> >
> >

> > You sounds really smart........
>
> You sound like a faggot pencil necked dweeb that
> everyone hated in highschool and remains a douche
> thinking they are superior to anyone when everyone
> else in society thinks of them as the bottom of
> the totem pole. And by faggot I mean nuisance not
> like you bigots mean to be derogatory towards
> homosexuals.
>
> You sir are a huge, huge faggot
Attachments:

Liberal Facts 15 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> Cause Fox and some right-wing groups say so...
> yeah.
>
> It's your unflinching willingness to believe
> anything that fits your agenda, without question,
> and your immediate jump to personal insults
> because you don't have anything to say that have
> made me realize that even if one or two of your
> points are right that your party is dangerous.
>
> Looking at the whole package, even if you erase
> the racism which you yourself spew, it's not hard
> to draw the conclusion that if the Republicans
> gain any power at all, it will be Murdoch and his
> interests that run this country, and not an
> electorate with any willingness to stray from
> party lines.
>
> 24 hours ago, I was actually considering some of
> the points. Since then, you've pretty well
> cemented my beliefs that continuing to stand
> against your party is the single most effective
> use of my vote.
>
> Go ahead, throw some more insults. Call me
> stupid. Show us your real colors.


Uh, no. Because that's what the facts show.

The first link that I gave you above which you dismissed as "two guys who did a study" was a NYT Magazine article re a study by two political science professors who used empirical results from voting and voter surveys to disprove one of the central tenets of the mythical "Southern Strategy."

The second, while from a more conservative leaning site walks through most of the central disconnects in the story as it now exists in a fairly easy to follow manner supported by fact without a lot of BS otherwise, which is why I posted it.

There are many others if you want to look. Which is doubtful given that you're already invested in it.

And apparently you're not smart enough to understand that you're talking to more than one person here. The only posts that I've made in this thread were the two above re the "Southern Strategy." Which, sorry, is pure political bs intended to manipulate people like you who bought into it because it fits with your own preconceptions.

Liberal Facts 15 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Fooled You Twice, Shame on You Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Liberal Facts 15 Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> >
> > > Third, I threw out the "Southern Strategy"
> > which
> > > is largely regarded as fact, and acknowledged
> > an
> > > intelligent argument.
> > >
> >
> > No, it's not fact. It's propaganda that you
> got
> > suckered into believing. There is a ton of
> stuff
> > out there which shoots down the whole myth and
> > provides the origin as a Dem talking point. I
> > gave you a few examples. Lots more if you want
> to
> > look. The only people who believe it as "fact"
> > are those who are too dumb, lazy, or
> brainwashed
> > to look.
>
> Cause Fox and some right-wing groups say so...
> yeah.
>
> It's your unflinching willingness to believe
> anything that fits your agenda, without question,
> and your immediate jump to personal insults
> because you don't have anything to say that have
> made me realize that even if one or two of your
> points are right that your party is dangerous.
>
> Looking at the whole package, even if you erase
> the racism which you yourself spew, it's not hard
> to draw the conclusion that if the Republicans
> gain any power at all, it will be Murdoch and his
> interests that run this country, and not an
> electorate with any willingness to stray from
> party lines.
>
> 24 hours ago, I was actually considering some of
> the points. Since then, you've pretty well
> cemented my beliefs that continuing to stand
> against your party is the single most effective
> use of my vote.
>
> Go ahead, throw some more insults. Call me
> stupid. Show us your real colors.


Bullshit to all of it. You werent considering a dam thing thats the oldest trick in the book and really weak.

You are stupid ive been saying it all along, facts are facts.

Its a complete joke the crap youre saying at this point. Murdoch bla bla bla, they would take away the electorates I mean jesus I can barely contain my laughter typing this. All you did was describe Obamacare and Sorros control of the mindless dems who walk stride for stride together bending over the electorate.

Faggot says what? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Liberal Logic 14 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Pathetic butthurts Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > No wonder everyone hates your candidates,
> > > republitards. You guys are the biggest little
> > > pansy butt hurts on earth. Wah wah wah
> >
> >
> > You sounds really smart........
>
> You sound like a faggot pencil necked dweeb that
> everyone hated in highschool and remains a douche
> thinking they are superior to anyone when everyone
> else in society thinks of them as the bottom of
> the totem pole. And by faggot I mean nuisance not
> like you bigots mean to be derogatory towards
> homosexuals.
>
> You sir are a huge, huge faggot

You should apply for MENSA being the intellectual powerhouse you are........

> Liberal Logic 14 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> I didn't read anything, I won't consider anything, and I
> have nothing better to do than thow insults around.

The first link you posted was utter crap. Trying to form a conclusion based on surveys which try to figure out what motivated people 50 years ago is ridiculous... I would have a hard time explaining my own motivations for all that I did even a decade ago, and expecting people to give honest answers about their own racism is ludicrous on its own face. Many who were die-hard racists in the 60s have broadened their views since then, and even if they could precisely recall their mindset at the time, expecting a decent portion of them to admit what shames them now would be foolish at best. Its in the same vein as how exit polls tend to skew inacurately toward the Democrats today... what people do in the voting booth and what they'll openly admit outside the poll are often two wildly different things.

I actually did read the second link that you posted.

If you think it was "easy to follow" then you made no attempt to read it with a critical eye.

There was a lot of "this (questionable fact) ocurred, therefor this (questionable conclusion) must be so". I'm not saying that it was wrong... it would just take a lot of effort to truly understand and/or validate it in its entirety. I was tired, and I did intend to come back and read it again. And no, I wasn't just going to look for one little point of disagreement and declare the entire thing to be invalid... I still might do it at some point, because yes - the "Southern Strategy" is regarded as fact, and seems to match up with observation, but unlike most Conservatives, I tend to question things, even when I've found the source to be trustworthy in the past. I do like to have a firm grasp of the facts, even when they aren't convenient for me.

If you really think that Cain was a great candidate, then I think it speaks volumes about the value of your opinions. Sure, against the likes of Palin and Bachman, he might not look quite so crazy, but to say that he was the best candidate that your party could field - well, I'll just leave the punchline to your own imagination. In comparison, Romney looked like he'd been groomed from birth for the role, and even he openly believed that 47% of Americans were of too poor of a pedigree to be interested in more than hand-outs.

And yes, I spent some time processing all of this today. I'll still keep a question-mark beside the "Southern Strategy" argument for the moment, but there was a genuine realization on my part that we're dealing with a segment of the population which turns unflinchingly to a news source that's proven wrong time and time again, without any recognition or concern for glaring a provable inacuracies. They tend to support their party as an entire package, where Democrats find many faults and disagreements within their own. It's a difference in mindset that Conservatives seemingly can't comprehend... that's why if you're a "Liberal", you MUST be against the 2nd amendment, and you MUST be for limiting soda sizes, and you MUST be for Obamacare. The fact that non-Conservatives break the party line so often seems to be totally lost on the GOP's favorite talking heads.

I have no respect for the name-calling, and I see it as the bastion of shallow minds (on both sides). I also doubt that I'll be wasting any more time on this thread. Even if you did develop a grasp of the English language before the night was over, I doubt that you could come up with much of value to add.

HAHAHAH you are a real brainiac. Still have trouble responding to more than one person I see.

Not shocking though that youre bitching something was too hard to follow with what an idiot youre consistently proving yourself to be.

You dont question shit if you think southern strategy is fact. Youre just throwing a temper tantrum because I called you out on the racism of the Democratic party and its history.

By the way youre not a moron anymore, youve graduated to absolutely brain dead idiot with youre latest diatribe of complete bullshit

If you wanted to be treated like an adult then act like one. If all youre going to do is regurgitate talking points and post complete bullshit than youll be treated like the brain dead idiot you are

> Liberal Facts 15 wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I doubt that you could come up with much of value to add.


Liberal Logic 14 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> HAHAHAH you are a real brainiac. Still have
> trouble responding to more than one person I see.
>
>
> Not shocking though that youre bitching something
> was too hard to follow with what an idiot youre
> consistently proving yourself to be.
>
> You dont question shit if you think southern
> strategy is fact. Youre just throwing a temper
> tantrum because I called you out on the racism of
> the Democratic party and its history.
>
> By the way youre not a moron anymore, youve
> graduated to absolutely brain dead idiot with
> youre latest diatribe of complete bullshit
>
> If you wanted to be treated like an adult then act
> like one. If all youre going to do is regurgitate
> talking points and post complete bullshit than
> youll be treated like the brain dead idiot you are


I rest my case.

Liberal Facts 15 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> I rest my case.


Like I said if you wanted to be treated like an adult then say something worthy of discussion.

If all you can do is parrot bullshit talking point propaganda then youll be treated like the idiot youre proving to be.

Youre trying to lecture about how the Dems kick party lines and do what they think is right for voters I mean are you kidding me with that shit? The same people that have to pass bills to see whats in them.

Like I said youre either an idiot or just a propagandist. Either way youve yet to say anything worthy of responding seriously too.

Liberal Logic 12 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Like I said youre either an idiot or just a
> propagandist. Either way youve yet to say
> anything worthy of responding seriously too.

And yet....

There's only one "o" in the word you were searching for, BTW.

And thus, my post contains infinitely more information than your own.

Liberal Facts 15 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Liberal Logic 12 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Like I said youre either an idiot or just a
> > propagandist. Either way youve yet to say
> > anything worthy of responding seriously too.
>
> And yet....
>
> There's only one "o" in the word you were
> searching for, BTW.
>
> And thus, my post contains infinitely more
> information than your own.

Are you really this stupid? Do you really not know what a propagandist is?

Also there is only one o in the word you idiot.......

Liberal Logic 12 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Liberal Facts 15 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Liberal Logic 12 Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Like I said youre either an idiot or just a
> > > propagandist. Either way youve yet to say
> > > anything worthy of responding seriously too.
> >
> > And yet....
> >
> > There's only one "o" in the word you were
> > searching for, BTW.
> >
> > And thus, my post contains infinitely more
> > information than your own.
>
> Are you really this stupid? Do you really not
> know what a propagandist is?
>
> Also there is only one o in the word you
> idiot.......

I know it's not nice to mess with lesser creatures, but I can't stop feeling that it's a a shame that you can't see the dot from my laser-pointer. I'm sure that I could keep you occupied all night.

What perplexes me is how I'm suppposed to come away from this exchange believing that any of you actually understand the links that you post. On the bright side, the whole "Fox News" dynamic is much clearer to me now.

Liberal Facts 15 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> I know it's not nice to mess with lesser
> creatures, but I can't stop feeling that it's a a
> shame that you can't see the dot from my
> laser-pointer. I'm sure that I could keep you
> occupied all night.
>
> What perplexes me is how I'm suppposed to come
> away from this exchange believing that any of you
> actually understand the links that you post. On
> the bright side, the whole "Fox News" dynamic is
> much clearer to me now.

Seriously are you mentally ill?

Im asking because I would feel bad if you were and I would no longer treat you like an idiot.

What perplexes me is why you corrected and error that didnt exist in my last post.

What perplexes me is how you cant grasp the simplest concept of figuring out whose posting to you.

Its not hard to keep track of two people.

Its quite clear nothing is actually clear to you.

Thanks again for showing what idiots progressives are.

Liberal Logic 12 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Seriously are you mentally ill?

I'm here aren't I? So, it's very likely. You should put a comma after "seriously".

> Im asking because I would feel bad if you were and
> I would no longer treat you like an idiot.

I'm sure you have no choice other than to treat everything "like an idiot". That part isn't your fault... I'm sure you were just born that way.

> What perplexes me is why you corrected and error
> that didnt exist in my last post.

I'm guessing "and" should be "an". Yes, I made a mistake. His error was minor compared to your non-literate keyboard mashing.

> What perplexes me is how you cant grasp the
> simplest concept of figuring out whose posting to
> you.

"Can't" should have an apostrophe. "Whose" was entirely the wrong word... I believe you probably were groping for the contraction of "who" and "is", which is "who's". Note the apostrophe. This is tricky stuff that gave me some difficulty in the second grade.

> Its not hard to keep track of two people.

Again, a contraction. I would respond by saying that I don't have much difficulty with my native language, but we each have our strengths. You two look very much the same from where I'm sitting.

> Its quite clear nothing is actually clear to you.

Wow. I suspect that you're actually an illegal alien who's trying to troll the Republican Party now.

> Thanks again for showing what idiots progressives
> are.

LMAO....

At first I thought this post was titled "Big booobs for all the Dems in the City of Fairfax parade"

I guess I can't read. That's embarrassing.

Liberal Facts 15 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Liberal Logic 12 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Seriously are you mentally ill?
>
> I'm here aren't I? So, it's very likely. You
> should put a comma after "seriously".
>
> > Im asking because I would feel bad if you were
> and
> > I would no longer treat you like an idiot.
>
> I'm sure you have no choice other than to treat
> everything "like an idiot". That part isn't your
> fault... I'm sure you were just born that way.
>
> > What perplexes me is why you corrected and
> error
> > that didnt exist in my last post.
>
> I'm guessing "and" should be "an". Yes, I made a
> mistake. His error was minor compared to your
> non-literate keyboard mashing.
>
> > What perplexes me is how you cant grasp the
> > simplest concept of figuring out whose posting
> to
> > you.
>
> "Can't" should have an apostrophe. "Whose" was
> entirely the wrong word... I believe you probably
> were groping for the contraction of "who" and
> "is", which is "who's". Note the apostrophe.
> This is tricky stuff that gave me some difficulty
> in the second grade.
>
> > Its not hard to keep track of two people.
>
> Again, a contraction. I would respond by saying
> that I don't have much difficulty with my native
> language, but we each have our strengths. You two
> look very much the same from where I'm sitting.
>
> > Its quite clear nothing is actually clear to
> you.
>
> Wow. I suspect that you're actually an illegal
> alien who's trying to troll the Republican Party
> now.
>
> > Thanks again for showing what idiots
> progressives
> > are.
>
> LMAO....


Amazing, absolutely amazing you referred to me directly and indirectly in the 3rd person like Im two different people in the same sentence.

When youve resorted to making sure everyones using proper punctuation on an internet message board you know youve lost the battle.

No wonder you believe propaganda talking points are facts.

Can you go back to telling us how the Dems are the party that break party lines and vote with the best intentions of the people putting their believes above party lines........... I cant even type that without laughing.

Liberal Logic 12 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Amazing, absolutely amazing you referred to me
> directly and indirectly in the 3rd person like Im
> two different people in the same sentence.

You effectively ARE the same person. I've come to realize that the astounding thing about your party is how homogeneous you are, how you all repeat the same talking points, and how you drop to insults when you have nothing to say.

> When youve resorted to making sure everyones using
> proper punctuation on an internet message board
> you know youve lost the battle.

It's not just punctuation -- you actually have difficulty forming sentences correctly. Neither of you have had a halfway intelligent contribution since the "Southern Strategy" links (which were simply copied from another questionable source), so I felt that this thread was due for some content which might actually help somebody learn something.

> No wonder you believe propaganda talking points
> are facts.

Again, you display your incapability of reading the simplest sentence with any level of understanding... I said "regarded as fact", and yet you belabor that single point, repeatedly displaying your failure to comprehend.

> Can you go back to telling us how the Dems are the
> party that break party lines and vote with the
> best intentions of the people putting their
> believes above party lines........... I cant even
> type that without laughing.

I can understand that... you can't type much without making me laugh, either. For what it's worth, the failure to distinguish between the word "believes" and "beliefs" goes far beyond a simple grammatical error. I can certainly understand why you post links to the words of others instead of attempting to pose an intelligent argument of your own.

Let me clue you in about something: if you're unable to paraphrase or explain something that you read, then you did not understand it. I'm sure that you can find words in articles that make you feel good about yourself, but there's a lot of surrounding content, too. I do realize that many of your talking points require a complete lack of context in order to seem sensible, though, so I won't harp on the point.

Holy crap you get dumber every time you post.

Ill give you a hint no ones going to learn anything from the idiot that cant even read what name posts what.

Im bored with you youve added nothing but propaganda to the thread. Im done responding to you until the next time you post propaganda bullshit.

Like I said initially you are an idiot and thats all the really needs to be said about you and everything youve posted.

If you want people to treat you like an adult try actually having an adult conversation based in reality. When you start out saying the GOP hates blacks and women youre a complete moron that should be treated like one.

Liberal Logic 12 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Holy crap you get dumber every time you post.

You call me dumb, and I demonstrate your stupidity. I realize the distinction won't register with you, though.

> Ill give you a hint no ones going to learn
> anything from the idiot that cant even read what
> name posts what.

So... you change the number in your name from time to time. You can post as twenty different people, but when you continue to make the same stupid mistakes, it gives the game away.

> Im bored with you youve added nothing but
> propaganda to the thread. Im done responding to
> you until the next time you post propaganda
> bullshit.

What propaganda? I rather doubt that you know what the word means.

> Like I said initially you are an idiot and thats
> all the really needs to be said about you and
> everything youve posted.

Yes, "you are an idiot", "you are an idiot". I appreciate the fact that your arsenal consists of little more.

> If you want people to treat you like an adult try
> actually having an adult conversation based in
> reality.

If I wanted an adult conversation right now, I realize that I'd need to look elsewhere.

> When you start out saying the GOP hates
> blacks and women youre a complete moron that
> should be treated like one.

I never said that, yet you've repeated it several times now. Just because Fox can repeat a mantra and make it seem real to you does not mean that reality itself has been altered.

As I alluded to earlier, I leave you with something that's a little closer to your level....
Attachments:

Liberal logic 12, 14, 15, whatever has repeatedly shown himself to have no capacity whatsoever to understand the complexities of an issue - and no desire to do so. He is so ridiculous that it would be easy to dismiss him, except that he represents a significant portion of the electorate - the 'low information' voter.

I don't know which is worse - the proudly stupid and ignorant (the Honey Boo Boo crowd) or the rabid proponents of a completely misguided set of beliefs (LL 15 et al). Either way, these people are dangerous because they vote. And they will drag down our country if we let them. They already have.

Sad State of Affairs Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Liberal logic 12, 14, 15, whatever has repeatedly
> shown himself to have no capacity whatsoever to
> understand the complexities of an issue - and no
> desire to do so. He is so ridiculous that it would
> be easy to dismiss him, except that he represents
> a significant portion of the electorate - the 'low
> information' voter.
>
> I don't know which is worse - the proudly stupid
> and ignorant (the Honey Boo Boo crowd) or the
> rabid proponents of a completely misguided set of
> beliefs (LL 15 et al). Either way, these people
> are dangerous because they vote. And they will
> drag down our country if we let them. They already
> have.

More progressive bullshit.

I know you idiots like to think of yourself as intellectuals but youre always the dumbest people in a room of any size.

Please go ahead and go into detail about the complexities of an issue then. You wont because you have nothing to add other than to parrot the talking points. The moron above cant even tell who posts what, lets see if you can do better

Liberal Logic 12 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Please go ahead and go into detail about the
> complexities of an issue then. You wont because
> you have nothing to add other than to parrot the
> talking points. The moron above cant even tell who
> posts what, lets see if you can do better

When youve resorted to pointing out that nobody can tell one twin idiot from another on an internet message board you know youve lost the battle.

He's lost it several times. Don't tell him though... he wouldn't understand.

Sad State of Affairs Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Liberal logic 12, 14, 15, whatever has repeatedly
> shown himself to have no capacity whatsoever to
> understand the complexities of an issue - and no
> desire to do so. He is so ridiculous that it would
> be easy to dismiss him, except that he represents
> a significant portion of the electorate - the 'low
> information' voter.
>
> I don't know which is worse - the proudly stupid
> and ignorant (the Honey Boo Boo crowd) or the
> rabid proponents of a completely misguided set of
> beliefs (LL 15 et al). Either way, these people
> are dangerous because they vote. And they will
> drag down our country if we let them. They already
> have.

+1

I thought this deserved to be repeated on Page 2.

Liberal Facts 15 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Liberal Logic 12 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Amazing, absolutely amazing you referred to me
> > directly and indirectly in the 3rd person like
> Im
> > two different people in the same sentence.
>
> You effectively ARE the same person. I've come to
> realize that the astounding thing about your party
> is how homogeneous you are, how you all repeat the
> same talking points, and how you drop to insults
> when you have nothing to say.
>

Says the guy parroting Dem talking points re the "Southern Strategy" and insulting people. lol

Since apparently you're not capable of doing anything more than clicking on a link to a summary article and dismissing it without any further look, here is most of the full source discussed in the first link:

http://books.google.com/books?id=6CvvMjI2Hc0C&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false

You can examine their analysis of voting results in detail for yourself.

And another shorter article which looks at basically the same question - that of the shift in voting results in the South and when that happened and why.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2013/04/30/southern_whites_shift_to_the_gop_predates_the_60s_118172.html

And a related article here:

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2010/09/09/misunderstanding_the_southern_realignment_107084.html

These as well as many others, all show basically the same thing - that the shift alleged to have been primarily racially based and attributable to the infamous "Southern Strategy" was underway long before any such strategy is even claimed to have existed. Rather, it primarily reflected increased economic development and growing wealth in the South (and elsewhere too btw) following WWII. Which completely undercuts the entire premise for the legend.

Gerry Connolly got booed at a parade.

So what, he earned it because of his rhetoric that all Republicans are evil.

Republicans attend parades, wave flags, and voice their opinions of politicians, just like Democrats and others.

Again, so what. Gerry has a tough skin, and says what he does to gain favor with his party's leadership, who hopefully will respond by allowing him to bring home the bacon to Fairfax.

And that, Honey Boo Boo, is the extent of the complex issues that brought us to page 2.

Good night.

And he comes back to do it all again...

(No, I don't believe that these are "different people", for an instant.)

Let's see what someone who can read with a sixth-grade level of comprehension might have seen in my comments:

> Third, I threw out the "Southern Strategy" which is largely regarded as
> fact, and acknowledged an intelligent argument.

Hmmm... "largely regarded as fact". Two days ago, I posted that. The phrase actually means that it's accepted in the mainstream, and I clearly was not calling it "fact". And I acknowleged something that actually had some substance.

And yesterday, there I am expressing my willingness to consider the argument:

> I still might do it at some point, because yes - the "Southern Strategy" is
> regarded as fact, and seems to match up with observation, but unlike most
> Conservatives, I tend to question things, even when I've found the source to
> be trustworthy in the past. I do like to have a firm grasp of the facts,
> even when they aren't convenient for me.

And in the same post, I break it down that I'm willing to reevaluate the position in easier-to-follow English, just in case the first part escaped you:

> I'll still keep a question-mark beside the "Southern Strategy" argument for
> the moment

But afterward, you come back and belabor the one point a half-dozen times despite what's in black and white.

And this goes to the heart of what I see from your party. There's never a willingness to reconsider anything, or conceed any point, no matter how obviously flawed it might be. As a group, you simply retrench and scream more loudly, just as you've done here.

That's what I mean by dialog... I might as well be screaming into a garbage disposal since the appliance is likely to understand and reason just as well as you do.

It's not just you - it's your party. If anyone actually shows an inch of intellectual progress, they run the risk of being ostracized by the rest of your white-bread clan. Admit nothing, consider nothing, conceed nothing... you folks just don't ever evolve, and never stray from your own talking points. Over the past twenty years, many of us have grown intellectually, or at least in the direction of tolerance. We learn, we accept mistakes, we grow. I've never once seen a die-hard Republican really change their mind about anything, and you have Fox News providing a "slot-car racer"-like track to keep you all on the exact same lines, no matter how many times their "facts" fail in the real world. Even the Church has shown a capacity to stop on occasion and reconsider their messages, though it generally takes a ludicrous level of proof before they will budge an inch.

As was demonstrated here, one stop and explain things, show what was printed in black and white, and none of it sticks. Your party is never "wrong". If misdirection and excuses can't cover for your shortcomings, you just engage in a bizarre group-think sense of denial, and turn to the person beside you so that you can each tell each other how "right" you are.

It's dangerous. We've seen it many other times, but one that really comes to mind - since it's cost thousands of American lives, and continues to do so - was the entire WMD fallacy that was forced upon the American public, with regard to Iraq, so many years ago. It appears unlikely that we'll ever be able to stabilize that country enough for it to pose less of a danger than it did when "W" took office.

You are a party of white apes, and you make every effort to undo everything that's truly great about this country.

TL/CNR (Too Long, Could Not Read)

Liberal Facts 15 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

>
> You are a party of white apes, and you make every
> effort to undo everything that's truly great about
> this country.

Just one more reason why no one takes your long incoherent ramblings seriously.

I'm intrigued that you consider Rush Limbaugh such a threat to your agenda. How many voters do you believe actually listen to him, maybe 1% at most?

I listen to Rush for the entertainment value, even when I don't agree with his opinions, though I'm later proven wrong when I don't believe him initially.

Here's an article Rush read on today's show:

http://gawker.com/texas-man-accidentally-shoots-girlfriend-while-aiming-a-718586793

Of course, Rush had to punctuate it with a rim shot:

"Who do you think these people voted for?"

I laughed.

Carry The One Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Sad State of Affairs Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Liberal logic 12, 14, 15, whatever has
> repeatedly
> > shown himself to have no capacity whatsoever to
> > understand the complexities of an issue - and
> no
> > desire to do so. He is so ridiculous that it
> would
> > be easy to dismiss him, except that he
> represents
> > a significant portion of the electorate - the
> 'low
> > information' voter.
> >
> > I don't know which is worse - the proudly
> stupid
> > and ignorant (the Honey Boo Boo crowd) or the
> > rabid proponents of a completely misguided set
> of
> > beliefs (LL 15 et al). Either way, these people
> > are dangerous because they vote. And they will
> > drag down our country if we let them. They
> already
> > have.
>
> +1
>
> I thought this deserved to be repeated on Page 2.

Still waiting for those examples that wont ever come because youre parroting talking points

Liberal Facts 15 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> You are a party of white apes, and you make every
> effort to undo everything that's truly great about
> this country.

You are an idiot theres just no other way to put it.

Im not the same as the other guy, I would never bother to waste time taking a brain dead idiot like yourself seriously. I see through your bullshit progressive agenda and know what a lost cause you are.

Its quite humorous how you act like youre doing people a favor considering something, youre not youre an idiot.

I dont know why the other guy bothers trying to engage you in a serious manner youve proven time and time again not to be worth it.

Your argument is because he wouldnt concede that your bullshit talking point isnt real hes the idiot? Again your an idiot.

I cannot emphasis enough how much of a complete idiot you are. So I just want to make it clear that you are an absolute idiot who no one should take seriously.

All you do is make these big sweeping bullshit talking point generalizations yet you cant ever give facts or details or examples about them. That guy gave you a serious response and you get on this high horse full of shit response because you cant engage on the issue.

So just to be clear you are a complete idiot full of liberal white guilt whose just trying to use this thread to push your bullshit out there.

Either give specifics with details and facts or save your windbag responses for your husband. Oh I almost forgot youre an absolute idiot

Keep registering my name too, its so hard to change the number moron.

I know if I walked in a Fairfax parade, all the demokrats would cheer for me too, along with Chairman Mao, Hugo Chavez, and Kim Jong Un (if they weren't all dead).

A useful conservative is a fiscal conservative.

A fiscal conservative is a person who respects the rule of law and insists on keeping taxes at a level capable of paying for all of the laws and wars on the books because he knows that's the only way to hold the electorate and their representatives to account.

A Republican who tries to derail legislation by refusing to pay for it undermines the rule of law.
The same goes for a Republican who starts a war without paying for it.

The US tax code is the world's greatest shell game. A true conservative would make real tax reform his or her top priority, not social issues.

Darn... you broke his run.

I figured he'd prattle to himself all day.

It's certainly the best way for him to find agreement.

Still waiting for you to show some specific facts and not just speak in your generalized bullshit since you think you have such a good understanding of everything.

Shocking all you can do is spit out talking points

Liberal Logic 76 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Still waiting for you to show some specific facts
> and not just speak in your generalized bullshit
> since you think you have such a good understanding
> of everything.
>
> Shocking all you can do is spit out talking points

And I'm waiting for you to craft a proper sentence.

No, there's no reason to bother - you can't recognize when someone is truly trying to understand what ticks inside your feeble mind, and you've demonstrated that you wouldn't recognize an intelligent point if it fell out of the sky, landed on your face, and started to wiggle.
Attachments:

Exactly what I thought. You just want to spread your bullshit hyperbole and cant show a specific example or explain anything. You just know how to parrot talking points and act like theyre facts.

I knew this from the start which is why I treated you like an idiot.

That's stunning.

I was honestly just wondering if you could make it through a single post without including a reference to parrots, the phrase "talking points" (I know you heard that a lot on Fox during the Benghazi "scandal"), or using the word "idiot".

And then, as if on cue, you just pull a hat-trick!

Liberal Logic 76 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Exactly what I thought. You just want to spread
> your bullshit hyperbole and cant show a specific
> example or explain anything. You just know how to
> parrot talking points and act like theyre facts.
>
>
> I knew this from the start which is why I treated
> you like an idiot.

I'm still waiting for a single sentence written in English, by the way. Keep at it, and I'm sure the law of averages will turn in your favor... eventually.

Two responses now, I can see thinking is very difficult to you.

Thanks for proving youre the idiot we all knew you to be.

You can stop now, Im not responding to you anymore. I can find the talking points on my own, I dont need you to keep posting them.

"You can stop now, Im not responding to you anymore."

Your post seems to contradict itself.

"I can find the talking points on my own, I dont need you to keep posting them."

If you think I've been posting "talking points", then you do not understand the phrase. I've suspected that for a while.

You've still failed to form a SINGLE correct sentence, though you did manage two include two out of three words/phrases which confirms just how little you have to say.

And yet you stand on the "idiocy" mantra. The ridiculousness is self-evident.

If you're truly done here, I'll sign off with something that you can understand and respect. Your role-model might even help to expand your vocabulary, which would be a welcome breath of fresh air.
Attachments:

Liberal Facts 15 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> "You can stop now, Im not responding to you
> anymore."
>
> Your post seems to contradict itself.
>
> "I can find the talking points on my own, I dont
> need you to keep posting them."
>
> If you think I've been posting "talking points",
> then you do not understand the phrase. I've
> suspected that for a while.
>

WMDS!

HALIBURTON!

BOOOOSH!

lulz

8 More Years, II Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The Insane Party of Hatred stars again - it's not
> what you're for, it's what you're against!

Yeah, you'd think the Democrats would have stuck their collective heads together and come up with a different strategy. The hatred, bigotry, arrogance and intolerance of today's Democrat Party is reminiscent of Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union.

It's sad to see a party that once stood for individual civil liberty turn into a party that stands for police states and dictatorships. Very sad.....

I remember when Democrats used to protest and resist the power of big government; now they embrace it, bow to it, and respect it like a small child would a father.

Dems-Now for Police State Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> 8 More Years, II Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > The Insane Party of Hatred stars again - it's
> not
> > what you're for, it's what you're against!
>
> Yeah, you'd think the Democrats would have stuck
> their collective heads together and come up with a
> different strategy. The hatred, bigotry,
> arrogance and intolerance of today's Democrat
> Party is reminiscent of Nazi Germany and the
> Soviet Union.
>
> It's sad to see a party that once stood for
> individual civil liberty turn into a party that
> stands for police states and dictatorships. Very
> sad.....
>
> I remember when Democrats used to protest and
> resist the power of big government; now they
> embrace it, bow to it, and respect it like a small
> child would a father.

I only align with Democrats because the Red party leaves me no choice. Anyone who has a die-hard party affiliation (and isn't getting a paycheck from it) is little more than a follower.

Despite Reagan tripling our national debt in just three years, I didn't really think that the Republicans had completely flipped their collective minds until Bush Jr.

But yes, I'm intolerant of your intolerance. It's an interesting dilema.

Not A Dem, Just A Thought Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> I only align with Democrats because the Red party
> leaves me no choice.

Anyone who starts out with a line like that is a die hard dem whose either bought into the bullshit or is just trying to play a moderate hoping to turn others.

The GOP is more moderate than its ever been while the Dems are so far left moderates get kicked out of their party.

Nice try though

Liberal Logic 76 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Not A Dem, Just A Thought Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > I only align with Democrats because the Red
> party
> > leaves me no choice.
>
> Anyone who starts out with a line like that is a
> die hard dem whose either bought into the bullshit
> or is just trying to play a moderate hoping to
> turn others.
>
> The GOP is more moderate than its ever been while
> the Dems are so far left moderates get kicked out
> of their party.
>
> Nice try though

I'm tempted to think that you honestly believe that.

Yuppers... Lincoln was a right-winger.

Not A Dem, Just A Thought Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I'm tempted to think that you honestly believe
> that.
>
> Yuppers... Lincoln was a right-winger.

Lincoln stopped all of us citizens from owning slaves

Todays party only wants to change the Constitution to stop gays from getting married and thats not our party, those are orders from God

You are an idiot whose just parroting your talking points again

Im done here

One more thing, look at the good things we do to help everyone

Sense women are to stupid to handle theyre own bodies, we try to save them and there unwanted babies

We stop kids from learning about sex because if they understand it, theyll get pregnant more

Were trying to get rid of social safety nets because hunger motivates people to go to work

Were working to make the rich richer so that theyll hire more people than they need

We bailed out the airlines (and the FAA) because congress flies a lot and they need to move about freely to run this country good

So what decent talking points can you parrot you idiot?

I gave three good points in my last post

Still waiting for you to show me something

Or did you run out of talking points to parrot you idiot?

Stupid Demokrat

Hi Ferfux, I knew it was a matter of time until you lost your shit getting called out on your bullshit

For all their hysteria, it's today's deranged right wing that is rapidly destroying our country. Our middle class reduced to serfdom, the greedy class run rampant, our women's health jeopardized, our justice system privatized and bowlderized, our children uneducated, our national treasure squandered on pointless wars and cronyism, our national bounty destroyed by greed and carelessness, our peace and tranquility wracked by gun violence, our government disdained and discredited, our governing institutions weakened and sabotaged, our participatory democracy rigged, ALL due to GOP policy in action.

Seriously how many different screen names are you going to post under Ferfux? Different screen name, same dumbass bullshit.

Liberal Logic 76 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Seriously how many different screen names are you
> going to post under Ferfux? Different screen
> name, same dumbass bullshit.

God, you're an idiot. How many times do you have to be told that there is more than one liberal (i.e., sane) person in Fairfax? I guess your small mind just can't process that.

Pot Kettle Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Liberal Logic 76 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Seriously how many different screen names are
> you
> > going to post under Ferfux? Different screen
> > name, same dumbass bullshit.
>
> God, you're an idiot. How many times do you have
> to be told that there is more than one liberal
> (i.e., sane) person in Fairfax? I guess your small
> mind just can't process that.

So every liberal is this stupid, got it.

I wasnt aware that they were all complete fucking idiots. If you say theyre all this dumb and its not just one person Ill take your word for it.

Not A Dem, Just A Thought Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Dems-Now for Police State Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > 8 More Years, II Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > The Insane Party of Hatred stars again - it's
> > not
> > > what you're for, it's what you're against!
> >
> > Yeah, you'd think the Democrats would have
> stuck
> > their collective heads together and come up with
> a
> > different strategy. The hatred, bigotry,
> > arrogance and intolerance of today's Democrat
> > Party is reminiscent of Nazi Germany and the
> > Soviet Union.
> >
> > It's sad to see a party that once stood for
> > individual civil liberty turn into a party that
> > stands for police states and dictatorships.
> Very
> > sad.....
> >
> > I remember when Democrats used to protest and
> > resist the power of big government; now they
> > embrace it, bow to it, and respect it like a
> small
> > child would a father.


> But yes, I'm intolerant of your intolerance. It's
> an interesting dilema.

Actually, you are intolerant of anyone who doesn't agree with you. You are intolerant of Christians and Jews. You are intolerant of white people, unless they are gay, atheist, or lick Obama's boots.

You are intolerant of anyone, black or white, who resists being controlled by an always expanding federal government.

I find it difficult to understand why anyone, any intelligent person, at least, would prefer the position of slave. And, that is what the democrats of today have become. The Party of Slaves to their beloved government. The Slaves are so impressed with the morons who make up the federal government, they will do whatever their masters instruct. They would march to their ultimate deaths, the sad souls they have become.

Today's democrats have become the Party of Hate, the Party of Intolerance, the Party of Slaves and Brainless Adoration.

>
> Today's democrats have become the Party of Hate,
> the Party of Intolerance, the Party of Slaves and
> Brainless Adoration.


Kudos. That's exactly what they are, and appealing to the lowest common denominator.

> Today's democrats have become the Party of Hate,
> the Party of Intolerance, the Party of Slaves and
> Brainless Adoration.


You spelled "republicans" wrong

Tough One Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Today's RepubliKKKanz have become the Party of
> Hate,
> > the Party of Intolerance, the Party of Slaves
> and
> > Brainless Adoration.
>
>
> Kudos. That's exactly what they are, and appealing
> to the lowest common denominator.


You're welcome.

Liberal Logic 76 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hi Ferfux, I knew it was a matter of time until
> you lost your shit getting called out on your
> bullshit

Is Ferfux really a Liberal?

The only reason I even recognize the name is because Eesh accuses people of being him quite often.

But, no, I'm not Ferfux, you talking-point parroting idiot.

Liberal Logic 007 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Liberal Logic 76 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Hi Ferfux, I knew it was a matter of time until
> > you lost your shit getting called out on your
> > bullshit
>
> Is Ferfux really a Liberal?
>
> The only reason I even recognize the name is
> because Eesh accuses people of being him quite
> often.
>
> But, no, I'm not Ferfux, you talking-point
> parroting idiot.


Take your meds Ferfux.

You could be weseal as well, weseal was just as stupid as ferfux. Radiophile usually uses registered names unless youve switched it up.

Either way youre still a fucking idiot.

Liberal Logic 76 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Take your meds Ferfux.
>
> You could be weseal as well, weseal was just as
> stupid as ferfux. Radiophile usually uses
> registered names unless youve switched it up.
>
> Either way youre still a fucking idiot.

It must be nice to not even recognize the embarassment that you should be feeling every time you hit "post".
Attachments:

Leave "W" out of this

He was actually brilliant
Attachments:

Wait, booos?
Attachments:

So Serious Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> > Today's democrats have become the Party of
> Hate,
> > the Party of Intolerance, the Party of Slaves
> and
> > Brainless Adoration.
>
>
> You spelled "republicans" wrong


Ha, ha, ha, that's so fucking funny...

I wanna party with you.

Liberal Logic 77 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Leave "W" out of this
>
> He was actually brilliant


Hi ferfux