We all agreed that if the Boston Bomber wasn't a white Christian male, it would invalidate Obama's liberal agenda. Well? Are all you libs ready to acknowledge your colossal failure now?

ITS ALL A FALSE FLAG MAN!!!!

What the hell are you talking about? You think terrorism and whether someone is a brown person or white person or teaparty or left winger that it somehow validates conservatism or invalidates liberalism

Are you a retard?

I guess you are right. We better stop healthcare and medicare because this guy was a RUSSIAN muslim, which by the way has a whole other history than traditional al qaeda affiliated extremists. But yea, lets lump everyone together cause your pea brains can only focus on simple things. 1.4billion people in the world, all of em are terrorists.

Wait... if thats the case we'd be pretty fucked huh?

Salon Reporter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> We all agreed that if the Boston Bomber wasn't a
> white Christian male, it would invalidate Obama's
> liberal agenda. Well? Are all you libs ready to
> acknowledge your colossal failure now?
Attachments:

Salon Reporter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> We all agreed that if the Boston Bomber wasn't a
> white Christian male, it would invalidate Obama's
> liberal agenda. Well? Are all you libs ready to
> acknowledge your colossal failure now?


How could any thinking person disagree with such a reasonable statement? It just makes too much sense!

Why else was the liberal media so openly speculating and hoping for the bomber to have been a tea-partier or pro-lifer?

Move this shit to the Off Topic forum.
Attachments:

You may be a liberal if you were shocked!, shocked! to learn that the Boston bombers are muslims, just as you are stunned to learn that Obamacare is a "trainwreck" (as described by a Dem congressman). If you are a liberal, you probably are a delusional nutcase.

The bombers apparently went to the same elite private school I did, and like me, received their anti-American, leftwing indoctrination there. Big surprise to find what a "liberal" education does to a person.

Salon Reporter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Why else was the liberal media so openly
> speculating and hoping for the bomber to have been
> a tea-partier or pro-lifer?


Why else was the conservative media so openly speculating it was a brown person and that the bomber was a saudi or al qaeda affiliate islamic fundamentalist?

Chechyn muslims are completely different than Taliban muslims. They have a whole other set of gripes that has nothing to do with sharia law, imposing islamic fundamentalism onto others, or any of the typical Al Qaeda shit.

But by all means Fox News, keep up with your sterling reporting record and tell us how they were affiliated with Al Qaeda of russia

what a joke Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Salon Reporter Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Why else was the liberal media so openly
> > speculating and hoping for the bomber to have
> been
> > a tea-partier or pro-lifer?
>
>
> Why else was the conservative media so openly
> speculating it was a brown person and that the
> bomber was a saudi or al qaeda affiliate islamic
> fundamentalist?
>
> Chechyn muslims are completely different than
> Taliban muslims. They have a whole other set of
> gripes that has nothing to do with sharia law,
> imposing islamic fundamentalism onto others, or
> any of the typical Al Qaeda shit.
>
> But by all means Fox News, keep up with your
> sterling reporting record and tell us how they
> were affiliated with Al Qaeda of russia


Why else was the liberal media convinced that they were white tea partiers?

And btw, CNN was the one who ran with the Saudi story.

Your understanding of Chechnya and Muslims also is obviously limited. They still are (mostly) Islamic, have the same fundamental basis, and have regularly worked in an allied way with Al Qaeda and associated groups for many years. There is little difference in their desire for a religious state in Russia. That's at the heart of the separatist conflict there.

what a joke Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Why else was the conservative media so openly
> speculating it was a brown person and that the
> bomber was a saudi or al qaeda affiliate islamic
> fundamentalist?


Couldnt possibly have anything to do with recent history.


Theres something else that happened too what was it, oh thats right the police saying theyre investigating a Saudi. Yea couldnt possibly have anything to do with that

dear faggity OP,

stop posting your obnoxious rants in the fairfax general forum. you are an attention-starved turd nibbler who really ought to be banned from FFU. FU.

sincerely,
reality

White muslims committing terrorist acts? Who could have seen that coming?

http://seattletimes.com/html/nationworld/2002936760_balkans18.html

op is either retarded or autistic. probably both.

It was the lib media who openly hoped for a tea-party, conservative bomber, "lest Obama's liberal agenda be discredited" on TV and radio broadcasts. And it's a fact that the lib media takes its marching orders direct from the DNC and Obama, as much of the media is run by ex-Clinton flunkies.

The rank BS that right wingers have started spewing in FFXU has me thinking

Perhaps they're not right-wingers at all...

Maybe its a crafty plan by DNC operatives to discredit the right because, well you know that no one could really be stupid as the OP and their cohort of InfoWar and Fox News zombies

That's the only excuse I could come up with for Cucinelli as well - that he's really a false flag operation to discredit normal anti-science suspiciously-homophobic creationists obsessed with everyone else's sex life

Its the only thing that makes sense

Salon Reporter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> We all agreed that if the Boston Bomber wasn't a
> white Christian male, it would invalidate Obama's
> liberal agenda. Well? Are all you libs ready to
> acknowledge your colossal failure now?

Right, now that the bomber is a Russian conservatives every where win.

This is the whacko type of shit conservatives talk about. Scary.

It completely fucking invalidates the naïve belief that EVERYONE we let into America will adjust to our cultures and ways because we are just that good.

We need to stop these backward cocksuckers with their abuse of our asylum programs.

The older brother was convicted on a domestic violence charge in 2009
and should have been deported but dumbass Obama/ICE failed to do so.
I realize he was only in this country to make a better life for his family.
Yeah right....

We need universal background checks for immigrants!

No nuts.
No felons.
No terrorist affiliations.

Check 'em all! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> We need universal background checks for
> immigrants!
>
> No nuts.
> No felons.
> No terrorist affiliations.

No Muslims.

iPfreely Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Check 'em all! Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > We need universal background checks for
> > immigrants!
> >
> > No nuts.
> > No felons.
> > No terrorist affiliations.
>
> No Muslims.


Basically anyone from a country that hates us, that would be many

The Muslims strike again!.............when will you sissified white liberals wake up?..never, it appears......oh, I forgot, the Muslim Hassan who yelled "alaku Akbar" before murdering 13 Americans wasn't a Muslim terrorist. That was, as the Obama administration has said, just a case of "workplace violence"

Where are all the libs hysterically screming for legislation to end immigration? Why hasn't Obama draged out and paraded around the relatives and loved ones of the deceased victims and declared that he will put an end to immigration and the violence which it causes? I swear, liberals are the most fukkin outrageous liars and hypocrites that ever walked the earth.

The basic principle of American foreign policy is that the enemy of my enemy is my friend. We supported the Taliban against the Soviet Union, we supported Saddam Hussein in the war against Iran, and we granted political asylum to Chechens like Tsarnaev because they were at war with the Russian government. We reap what we sow.

rumsfeld Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The basic principle of American foreign policy is
> that the enemy of my enemy is my friend. We
> supported the Taliban against the Soviet Union, we
> supported Saddam Hussein in the war against Iran,
> and we granted political asylum to Chechens like
> Tsarnaev because they were at war with the Russian
> government. We reap what we sow.


In the words of the great George Washington in his farwell address over 200 years ago: "The great rule of conduct for us, in regard to foreign nations, is, in extending our commercial relations, to have with them as little political connection as possible. So far as we have already formed engagements, let them be fulfilled with perfect good faith. Here let us stop."


This is why he's still the greatest president we've every had. He got it.

Just for a moment, let's ignore the complete lack of logic in the OP's screed, and ask why anyone would WANT the bombers to be from any particular group. There's one easy answer: we want them to be "not us", so we can feel comfortable that "we aren't like that".

http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/lets_hope_the_boston_marathon_bomber_is_a_white_american/ is presumably the article somoene mentioned. If you read (and understand) it, you'll note that their point is that ONLY a white American is likely to avoid the above phenomenon (yeah, non-whites/non-Americans can say "not us, we aren't like that" -- but other than the few who ARE like that, they were already saying that).

There's no excuse for anyone of any political persuasion hoping that the bombers were members of any particular group. I understand Salon's point, but find their story inappropriately timed: people don't want to hear it right now, and so they won't. Salon should have waited to make the point at a time when people would be more able to hear it, not for reasons of political correctness, but because people like the OP are going to misinterpret it right now.

You filthy Infidels! Liberalism and other "isms" are against Allah's will. Inshallah, we will redeem the world from such foolishness.

Qur'an 9:29: Fight against those who believe not in Allah, nor in the Last Day, nor forbid not that which has been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth among the people of the Book, until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

Allahu akbar!

Great an idiot towel head worshiping the child molester Mohamed.

You Infidel bastard will burn in Hell. Inshallah, we will inflict a painful death on you.

Allahu akbar!

great!!! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Great an idiot towel head worshiping the child
> molester Mohamed.

I'll meet you there asswipe. Mohamed was a queer.

Who are calling "queer," you filthy, blasphemous, passive homosexual Infidel! I had >20 wives and sex slaves, all female! Allah was so merciful that he let me marry Safyan, the beautiful 17 year old widow of the chief of the Jews the very night after the battle! Alhamdulillah!

Allahu akbar!

great!!! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I'll meet you there asswipe. Mohamed was a queer.

Don't feed the trolls. Sheesh.

If this had happened under a Republikan administration, guaranteed that the terrorists would have gotten away, and with their blessing, too.

I'm proud that these boys received welfare, free food, and free housing when they were granted political asylum in the U.S., even after the Russians had tipped us off to their radicalism.

Definitely smarter men running the show nowadays - quite the reversal of affairs from the Republikans.

The Demokkkrats will undoubtedly ask what the Boston marathon participants to provoke these muslims

It was Israel's fault...

Notor Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The Demokkkrats will undoubtedly ask what the
> Boston marathon participants to provoke these
> muslims

English much?

"Rambling and incoherent is no way to go through life, son."
-- Dean Wormer

Because the Boston Marathon is run on Patriot's Day and there was a bunch of gun legislation making the ultra-fringe element of Conservatism twitchy? You act like the Oklahoma City Bombing never happened. Also, the recent spate of young white males shooting people hasn't instilled my faith in the mental stability of your demographic.

Can't read, huh pal? Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through liffe, asshole.

Greybeard is the board illiterate. No worries

Notor Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> Can't read, huh pal? Fat, drunk and stupid is no
> way to go through liffe, asshole.

Somehow I don't think I'm the one who can't read. READ. THE. POST. Verbs are important. I can guess what's missing, but this isn't exactly a 100,000-word essay: inability to put together a single sentence definitely qualifies as "incoherent". I suppose "rambling" was a stretch; one sentence a ramble doth not make.

Meanwhile, get a "liffe", sonny.

Hey Greybeard, still can't read huh? Tragic, really, you illiterate slob. Now phuk off asshole.

Too funny.

Wut grade r u in? Do u still get a nap after lunch?

Awww, wud da madda widdle fella, did Greybeard get his widdle feelingz hert?
Still, your a very, very, funny guy. A complete asswipe, but a great deal of fun to mock and ridicule. Cheers, dipshit.

Amanda Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Because the Boston Marathon is run on Patriot's
> Day and there was a bunch of gun legislation
> making the ultra-fringe element of Conservatism
> twitchy? You act like the Oklahoma City Bombing
> never happened. Also, the recent spate of young
> white males shooting people hasn't instilled my
> faith in the mental stability of your demographic.


And you act like 9/11, Marine Corp barracks, Cole bombing, and thousands of other Islamic-based acts of terrorism, world-wide and not only against us, haven't happened. And that there aren't literally 10s of millions of average, everyday Muslims who hold as a fundamental belief that we must be subjugated to Islam however that needs to happen.

Over 90% of street whores are young females. Very hard to trust that demographic.

Notor Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Awww, wud da madda widdle fella, did Greybeard get
> his widdle feelingz hert?
> Still, your a very, very, funny guy. A complete
> asswipe, but a great deal of fun to mock and
> ridicule. Cheers, dipshit.

Cute. And precisely consistent with your previous posts. Oops, it's past your bedtime!

*points and laffs at Greybeard*

You r such a pathetic turd. now scram kiddie...

You're repeating yourself, and becoming tiresome.

Get lost u dekrepit pathetic turd.

Amanda Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Because the Boston Marathon is run on Patriot's
> Day and there was a bunch of gun legislation
> making the ultra-fringe element of Conservatism
> twitchy? You act like the Oklahoma City Bombing
> never happened. Also, the recent spate of young
> white males shooting people hasn't instilled my
> faith in the mental stability of your demographic.


And you act like the first world trade bombing, 9-11, the times square attempt, several different attacks on our Embassy, the USS Cole, the london bombings, the madrid bombings, a couple hungred bombings in isreal, the russian apartment bombings, bali bombings, a similar attack in febuary in india all didnt happen.

I can keep going on and on and on theres a very long and rich history of muslim terrorist bombings especially in the last 10-15 years yet some how McVeigh is the standard.

That bombing fit the islamic mo with a small bomb packed to wound nastily, McVeigh separatists bomb government buildings.

The only people spouting that it was most like a white anti government male are people who desperately wanted it to be so. The facts couldnt have disagreed more

The liberals at the DNC are planning to hold a vigil for the older brother who was martyred by an unjust police action. They will also be demanding that the younger brother be released on the grounds that he is muslim, and that we shouldn't judge him but rather just "celebrate diversity".

How long until this terrorist gets a teaching job at a "prestigious" university teaching kids how horrible America is?

.......weather underground????????

I think there should be an auction. Highest 20 bidders get to be the firing squad to kill this terrorist and the proceeds go to the victims. I'll open the bidding at $10,000

Diehard Lib Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The liberals at the DNC are planning to hold a
> vigil for the older brother who was martyred by an
> unjust police action. They will also be demanding
> that the younger brother be released on the
> grounds that he is muslim, and that we shouldn't
> judge him but rather just "celebrate diversity".


It is our fault after all.

Salon Reporter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> We all agreed that if the Boston Bomber wasn't a
> white Christian male, it would invalidate Obama's
> liberal agenda. Well? Are all you libs ready to
> acknowledge your colossal failure now?


What the Hell are you talking about? Your "argument" makes no sense.

Stupid Libs.... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> How long until this terrorist gets a teaching job
> at a "prestigious" university teaching kids how
> horrible America is?

Columbia already has the spot reserved if he survives and ever gets out of prison. If not maybe he teach online distant learning classes for them

Since the second bomber is still alive, is it safe to say that leftwingers have a new hero / Che to idolize?

The right created him and now they get to use him for their purposes. Look at this site or the sites in Boston. For years they were replete with posts taunting "Muzzies" and and telling them to go home. You completely marginalize someone and then act shocked when he lashes out. There is absolutely no justification for what these brothers did, but the xenophobes have a bit of blood on their hands, too. But go ahead, put on your tinfoil hat and keep trolling aout how some are happy about the events. If anyone is happy, it is the xenophobes.

My son came home yesterday from school (South Lakes High School) and said his Muslim friend told him that Americans kills innocent people, too.

The Boston Bombers are just a part of Islam, no more, no less.

President Obama soon will get up announce that this has nothing to do with Islam.

And Liberals will be staring at a buck-naked Obama and commenting about how fine is clothes are.

FUCKIN CHRISTIANITY and its MASS MURDERING CULTURE!

Idiot

Let the facts speak. If Obama couldn't bring himself (or Holder) to accept that the shooters were from the Islamic community, Bostonians (who are mightly liberal) will be outraged (New England outrage is still like the Tea Party of 1773). The people I know in Long Island are angry at the administration for still providing little of the promised help after Sandy. Maybe liberals will wake up and see the government is not the answer...but a part of the problem.

try again Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> There is
> absolutely no justification for what these
> brothers did, but the xenophobes have a bit of
> blood on their hands, too.

So you say theres no justification but then you give a justification. There you guys go again making excuses for evil psychopaths

Islam is a filthy murderous cult

Uh.. actually he didn't, in any way, offer a justification. I guess reading is hard for you, though.

Surviving bomber court room defense strategies:

1. evil brother controlled him
2. first seven years in his homeland warped his moral fabric
3. never recovered from his uncle's disapprovals
4. bullied at his AP high school for Russian accent
5. unfairly cut from varsity wrestling team
6. entered but never finished a marathon
7. brother tricked him by telling him they were going to a pot luck dinner

hopefully the end result is an 8 by 8 cell, 24 hours a day for the next 70 years

try again Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The right created him and now they get to use him
> for their purposes. Look at this site or the
> sites in Boston. For years they were replete with
> posts taunting "Muzzies" and and telling them to
> go home. You completely marginalize someone and
> then act shocked when he lashes out. There is
> absolutely no justification for what these
> brothers did, but the xenophobes have a bit of
> blood on their hands, too. But go ahead, put on
> your tinfoil hat and keep trolling aout how some
> are happy about the events. If anyone is happy,
> it is the xenophobes.


Uh... Nobody is "shocked."

That was kind of the point.

Conservitard Logic 102 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Uh.. actually he didn't, in any way, offer a
> justification. I guess reading is hard for you,
> though.


Actually he did. You cant claim theres no excuse then say another group has blood on their hands assigning blame to them.

Thinking must be difficult for you.

Quote

You cant claim theres no excuse then say another group has blood on their hands assigning blame to them.

once you've sobered up you may want to try that one again. you just provided another scintillating bit of illogic from the site's dumbest poster. congratulations.

Salon Reporter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> We all agreed that if the Boston Bomber wasn't a
> white Christian male, it would invalidate Obama's
> liberal agenda. Well? Are all you libs ready to
> acknowledge your colossal failure now?

Spoken like a true redneck conservative who has never left the town he grew up in.

Umm... let me give you a clue. The Muslim religion is the largest religion in the world. Every religion has it radicals. Not every foreigner is a terrorist.

The Olympic stadium bomber was a white Christian male. He did the bombing and many others because he hated foreigners and wanted to stop abortion.

Chalk up 2 more terrorist captures\kills for Obama.

If only Bush could of had the same success. 5 days and the terrorist are captured or dead. THAT'S A PRETTY GOOD RECORD!

Bush couldn't find shit, including WMD's.

Let's not forget the most famous white Christian male bomber.
Attachments:

Drege Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Let's not forget the most famous white Christian
> male bomber.


Tim was a good guy.

Curmudgeon Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>

Quote

You cant claim theres no excuse then say
> another group has blood on their hands assigning
> blame to them.

>
> once you've sobered up you may want to try that
> one again. you just provided another
> scintillating bit of illogic from the site's
> dumbest poster. congratulations.


Youve proven time and time again to be a complete idiot and incapable of thought.

You might not even be worthy of the gerry rule. This is going to be your last chance to act like an adult then you can waste all the breath you want but I wont be responding.

As usual though its about as simple of a concept that you cannot understand. If you assign blame to something else you are making an excuse for what happened. Blame goes to people that cause things to happening. Blaming someone else implies that if they didnt do that the action wouldnt have taken place. If you concede the action would have occured anyway then theres no blame to be assigned elsewhere. Either it was a disgusting cheap partisan political attack using a tragic event for political gain or making an excuse, pick one.

Thats about as simple as it gets, if you cant even understand that you should sue the school system for failing you.

Quote

If you assign blame to something else you are making an excuse for what happened.

close! except, wrong as usual. does it hurt being that stupid?

These filthy murderous muslims are the scourge of the world. Why can't these lawless pigs just stay in their thrid-world cesspool countries?

Liberal Logic 102 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Curmudgeon Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >

Quote

You cant claim theres no excuse then say
> > another group has blood on their hands
> assigning
> > blame to them.

> >
> > once you've sobered up you may want to try that
> > one again. you just provided another
> > scintillating bit of illogic from the site's
> > dumbest poster. congratulations.
>
>
> Youve proven time and time again to be a complete
> idiot and incapable of thought.
>
> You might not even be worthy of the gerry rule.
> This is going to be your last chance to act like
> an adult then you can waste all the breath you
> want but I wont be responding.
>
> As usual though its about as simple of a concept
> that you cannot understand. If you assign blame
> to something else you are making an excuse for
> what happened. Blame goes to people that cause
> things to happening. Blaming someone else implies
> that if they didnt do that the action wouldnt have
> taken place. If you concede the action would have
> occured anyway then theres no blame to be assigned
> elsewhere. Either it was a disgusting cheap
> partisan political attack using a tragic event for
> political gain or making an excuse, pick one.
>
> Thats about as simple as it gets, if you cant even
> understand that you should sue the school system
> for failing you.


I'm starting to think you miss me when I'm not around. Well here I am. A couple of contradictions in your statements I will point out. The man was subtly making the argument that xenophobia and intolerance breeds the same and eventual violence. That point completely escaped you and you interpreted it as not putting blame on the culprits. Second, you sit here among fellow hacks using the actions of these two bastards to demonize and attack America's overwhelmingly peaceful and prosperous Muslim population while referring to the opposing view as a "partisan political attack."

I realize the irony and hypocrisy may be lost on you.

Send the filthy murderous muslims back. All of them. Immediately.

And how do you intend to logistically and constitutionally do that?

New York v Miln constitutionally, and logistically, at the point of of a machine gun.

Notor Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hey Greybeard, still can't read huh? Tragic,
> really, you illiterate slob. Now phuk off asshole.


Greybeard = Gordon BLVD. Best to ignore both

LiverLips Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Salon Reporter Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > We all agreed that if the Boston Bomber wasn't
> a
> > white Christian male, it would invalidate
> Obama's
> > liberal agenda. Well? Are all you libs ready
> to
> > acknowledge your colossal failure now?
>
> Spoken like a true redneck conservative who has
> never left the town he grew up in.
>
> Umm... let me give you a clue. The Muslim
> religion is the largest religion in the world.
> Every religion has it radicals. Not every
> foreigner is a terrorist.
>
> The Olympic stadium bomber was a white Christian
> male. He did the bombing and many others because
> he hated foreigners and wanted to stop abortion.


Clues from the clueless. LOL

The world's largest religion, by far, is Christianity:

http://www.adherents.com/Religions_By_Adherents.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_religious_groups

Geez, you libs are hilarious. Almost always wrong, but funny.

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm starting to think you miss me when I'm not
> around. Well here I am. A couple of contradictions
> in your statements I will point out. The man was
> subtly making the argument that xenophobia and
> intolerance breeds the same and eventual violence.
> That point completely escaped you and you
> interpreted it as not putting blame on the
> culprits. Second, you sit here among fellow hacks
> using the actions of these two bastards to
> demonize and attack America's overwhelmingly
> peaceful and prosperous Muslim population while
> referring to the opposing view as a "partisan
> political attack."
>
> I realize the irony and hypocrisy may be lost on
> you.

I didnt miss the point he was trying to say. And no intolerance doesnt breed that psycho extremists breed those types of actions. A very small percentage of people that are exposed to intolerance of any sort bomb things. If it breed it things would be getting bombed left and right all over the world in every town and city but thats not happening.

Trying to blame intolerance is taking the blame off the offender and putting it onto society like somehow they were a product of it and their bombing wasnt their fault. Liberals have a tendency to blame everything but the culprit just like somehow shootings are the guns fault. Theres absolutely no excuse for what they did.

Not even to mention they lived in BOSTON not 1840s Georgia. Cities dont get much more tolerant than the in New England and the guy was at nothing but tolerant liberal schools and one had a scholarship or something as well. The intolerance excuse is weak on its own, then trying to apply it to Boston would be comical if so many people were affected by the heinous act.

And no only a liberal would read anything Ive said as demonizing muslims. Not every muslim is a terrorist but as a group they commit a lot of terrorist acts. I deal in facts not some PC utopia where we just ignore every single fact and reality and pretend like theres no chance it could be a muslim despite being a muslim terrorist style bombing because that would be "intolerant".

In fact your own statement about all muslims not being terrorists just proves that its not "intolerance" that causes the attacks in the first place. If the bombers were so oppressed presumably they all are and in much worse ways elsewhere yet they arent out setting off bombs left and right

Drege Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Let's not forget the most famous white Christian
> male bomber.


White? yes. Male? Yes. Christian. Nope

"In a letter to the Buffalo News daily in New York state yesterday, McVeigh used the word "sorry" for the first time, but instantly rendered it meaningless. "I am sorry these people had to lose their lives," he wrote. "But that's the nature of the beast. It's understood going in what the human toll will be.
...

In his letter, McVeigh said he was an agnostic but that he would "improvise, adapt and overcome", if it turned out there was an afterlife. "If I'm going to hell," he wrote, "I'm gonna have a lot of company." His body is to be cremated and his ashes scattered in a secret location."

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2001/jun/11/mcveigh.usa4

Quote

New York v Miln constitutionally, and logistically, at the point of of a machine gun.

wow a conservative poster with some actual knowledge! i disagree with you, but good on you for having a head on your shoulders unlike some some of your dumb-ass compadres.

i think you'll find that NY v Miln is faulty precedent at this time -- was sort of refuted in Gibbons v Ogden and there's a lot of more modern Commerce Clause interpretation and, more generally, Federal supremacy interpretation that would invalidate something like that anymore. Although this current court is taking a hard turn to the right, so who knows what the future will hold.

but i gotta say it's refreshing to see a conservative on this site who knows something about something.

Quote

Liberals have a tendency to blame everything but the culprit

nice try. let's look at the original quote.

Quote

> There is
> absolutely no justification for what these
> brothers did, but the xenophobes have a bit of
> blood on their hands, too.

the "liberal" placed the blame squarely on the culprit. the subtlety of the second half of the statement was lost on you, unfortunately. it doesn't disqualify the first half whatsoever.

It is stunning, absolutely stunning, to see a liberal who is not utterly ignorant of facts, history and law, and breathtakingly shocking to see a liberal who is familiar, on any level, with constitutional case law. Of course, the fact that he utterly confuses the historical chronology is perfectly predictable (Gibbons v Ogden PRECEDED New York v Miln by over ten years), but still, that a liberal had EVEN HEARD of the case is astounding.

you are right jerry. i stand corrected on the chronology.

"Who agreed to what?" you are such a moron, infact for you that is a compliment

You suppose Fort Hood had no connection to terrorism.

People who think like you are the cause of all problems in America!

"Salon Reporter" was simply referring to our Muslim president who refuses to use the word terrorism in the most obvious cases.

JerryManderer@ Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It is stunning, absolutely stunning, to see a
> liberal who is not utterly ignorant of facts,
> history and law, and breathtakingly shocking to
> see a liberal who is familiar, on any level, with
> constitutional case law. Of course, the fact that
> he utterly confuses the historical chronology is
> perfectly predictable (Gibbons v Ogden PRECEDED
> New York v Miln by over ten years), but still,
> that a liberal had EVEN HEARD of the case is
> astounding.

You really should dial back the snarkiness. It tends to make you appear silly. Refutation does not imply chronology, except in every day usage, which is not necessarily applicable to law. Your citation is moot in any respect, because New York v. Miln was overturned in Edwards v. California in the early 1940s.

But if you really do think you can use the "police power" of a state to deport anyone lawfully admitted into the country by Federal authority and whose only "crime" is adherence to a faith you believe is dangerous, you are going to have a tough time in the famously liberal Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Perhaps if a terrorist attack were to occur in one of the Red States of the South, you'd have better luck. They tend to favor the notion of "state's rights". They also tend to vote Republican, despite the fact that the iconic Republican President Abraham Lincoln rather definitively answered the question of whose law trumps whose in the spring of 1865.

Typical asshole liberal hypocrite. Somehow you didn't notice the "snarkiness" that I was REPLYING to. Phukkin ignorant hypocritical maggot.

JerryManderer@ Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> tends to make you appear silly. >
>
> Typical asshole liberal hypocrite. Somehow you
> didn't notice the "snarkiness" that I was REPLYING
> to. Phukkin ignorant hypocritical maggot.


You are gay.

The right are like children. Mostly only have a minimum intellectual capability or tend to try to appeal to that minimum.

They're like children, they'll throw their temper tantrum, say it's someones fault and say he doesn't like them. He'll say that they're not good people.

My son does that about my nephew all the time, comparing himself as such a good and nice child in comparison.

All the while looking for attention. Needing to spread those very simplistic ideals.

There's only so much you can elaborate about promoting hate and intolerance. So often like a child, you see frustration in these people if their is any questioning of their rhetoric. Frustration commonly turns into anger.

Racist Nationalism can turn into a very dangerous thing. So with that said, it's best to treat their antics like you would if a child were doing it. Ignore it for the most part.

The left are like children. Mostly only have a minimum intellectual capability or tend to try to appeal to that minimum.

They're like children, they'll throw their temper tantrum, say it's someones fault and say he doesn't like them. He'll say that they're not good people.

My son does that about my nephew all the time, comparing himself as such a good and nice child in comparison.

All the while looking for attention. Needing to spread those very simplistic ideals.

There's only so much you can elaborate about promoting hate and intolerance. So often like a child, you see frustration in these people if their is any questioning of their rhetoric. Frustration commonly turns into anger.

Racist Leftists Nationalism can turn into a very dangerous thing. So with that said, it's best to treat their antics like you would if a child were doing it. Ignore it for the most part.v

Just a matter of time before yet another of these angry libs goes off again.

Salon Reporter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> We all agreed that if the Boston Bomber wasn't a
> white Christian male, it would invalidate Obama's
> liberal agenda. Well? Are all you libs ready to
> acknowledge your colossal failure now?

How, exactly, does the bomber's religion even intersect with President Obama's agenda, let alone invalidate it?

Your statement is nonsensical.

You right wingers sure love to generalize and seem so sure of yourself being as violent and stupid with a history of terrorism that you have. You reap what you sow. You want to blame all Muslims? Adam Lanza was a gun loving white male Christian? He gunned down face to face defenseless babies. Why is that considered isolated?

.
Attachments: