HomeFairfax General ForumArrest/Ticket SearchWiki newPictures/VideosChatArticlesLinksAbout
Off-Topic :  Fairfax Underground fairfax underground logo
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Hindsight is Rarely 20/20
Posted by: Scott Lehman ()
Date: August 13, 2012 08:13AM

..



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/20/2012 05:45PM by Scott Lehman.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Hindsight is Rarely 20/20
Posted by: friskydingo ()
Date: August 13, 2012 08:16AM

Dude... please explain to me who the Fuck you are?

please please tell me.what's going.on... Im so confused

 

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Hindsight is Rarely 20/20
Posted by: friskydingo ()
Date: August 13, 2012 08:30AM

Nah I'm serious... what, who are you, scott..... this thing has me so confused dude.

 



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/13/2012 08:31AM by friskydingo.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Hindsight is Rarely 20/20
Posted by: Ralph Pootawn ()
Date: August 13, 2012 08:31AM

Scott Lehman Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> “Joe Friday” asked several questions last
> night. They almost sound sincere. Despite my
> belief that he actually posed them to make
> insinuations, I’ll give him a bit of an answer.
>
> No, you don’t need details about my day, or my
> kids’ days. They had parties to attend both
> days, and since not all of them were together,
> much of the weekend was dedicated to shuttling
> them around.
>
> One of the parties was hosted by someone who was
> – I think – the second person I called when
> all of this began. He was actually high on my
> list to because he’s with one of the armed
> Federal services, and he understands my humor, at
> least a bit. He couldn’t help that morning, but
> he was up-front about it. I didn’t really get
> an explanation until yesterday, and it still makes
> me laugh. He said “it seemed like you were
> threatening to bring down the internet, and I know
> you well enough that I was worried you could do
> it.” I laugh because he gives me far too much
> credit, and because it makes perfect sense.
> Anyway, we’re already talking about our next
> “kids-swap/sleepover” thing.
>
> So no, the people who actually know me, and know a
> bit of the story don’t seem to be overly
> concerned. This whole thing, including the
> insinuations here, have forced my kids to grow up
> a lot in the last two months. I’ll always
> resent the time that was lost, but it’s been a
> “growth experience”, of sorts, for all of us.
>
> I’ll be a little while deciding how to proceed.
> I have a lot of calls to make, records to collect,
> and people to talk to.
>
> But as of this morning, one thing is clearer…
> “Sil” (an acronym, not a name) isn’t going
> to help my family put things back together.
> That’s really unfortunate, since I think it was
> Sil’s actions and inactions that made everything
> possible. Because of secondary considerations,
> there’s a “sub-clause” in that part of the
> story that I’m going to try to pause to attempt
> to understand. And because of tertiary
> considerations, I probably won’t be discussing a
> lot of specifics about any of that.
>
> But, “Sil” knows Brian. I haven’t been able
> to ask if they’ve had any contact in this…
> Sil, like some others, won’t respond to direct
> questions at all, though she’s discussed it with
> people that haven’t been mentioned here, it
> seems.
>
> I have to move forward, assuming the worst in all
> cases. Every bit of “truth” has made this
> seem more manageable. But the final realization,
> I think, is that the truth would’ve stopped this
> from starting.
>
> Sil has a kid, too. I want to consider him in
> this, as well. Again, if I know the truth, it’s
> my hope that there’s reason to exclude him.
> From the outset, Sil knew that I was “worked
> up”. She told others of me pacing the street at
> night… but what she didn’t tell is that I was
> weighing my options. Believing the orders from
> Mike were illegal, I was wondering: “if I
> ‘run’, will Sil call Mike? Will Mike
> follow-up? How far would Fairfax go to ‘get’
> me, and if I’m ‘running’, how easy would it
> to be to ‘accidentally’ shoot me?”
>
> My guess now is that Sil was trying to help. She
> knew if I knew the truth, I would’ve been on my
> way back home as soon as I could get my toothbrush
> back in my bag. So, she “stretched” things.
> How this included her offering to “call in
> sick” for me on my last day of work is beyond
> me, but again, Sil wasn’t willing to talk
> through anything with her crazy in-law. There
> were exchanges that could be described only as
> “passive aggressive”. There was a lot of
> frustration on my part, and I was cut off from
> everyone else, and all of this seemed to build her
> own belief that I “needed rest”. And I did.
> I just couldn’t get it in that place and under
> those circumstances.
>
> Anyway, for the last two months, Sil has just
> watched and read. She’s afraid that if she
> tells me the truth, I’ll get angry, and
> muck-rake her. I’m going to talk about her, for
> sure, but only in the context of this chapter in
> my family’s lives. I’ll probably speculate
> more because I don’t know… every now and then,
> someone here actually jumps in with two cents of
> input that’s worth a lot more. Of course, other
> trolls will dedicate themselves to distorting
> things... I guess everyone needs a hobby. I still
> want to make sense of this, and I am infuriated
> that Sil still won’t give me the information I
> need to determine if there was ANY wrongdoing on
> the part of Mike Ricker, or the County. So, I
> have to assume there was none. I’m sure I’ll
> talk about that weekend as I continue trying to
> make sense of it, but it appears that speculation
> will be all that I have to work with.
>
> This is going to get expensive. Unfortunately,
> the only way through this for me, it seems, is
> “forward”. I need the truth to put the last
> two months into context. I’m guessing Sil has
> had to fill out an e-QIP in recent years… she
> knows what I’m going to need to deal with, and
> why I’m going to need a solid explanation of
> what transpired here. No, it won’t stop me from
> passing a background check, but her lack of
> cooperation could still ruin my career.
>
> I don’t know what I’ll talk about here, or
> when. I’m certainly not done with Susan
> Mitchell, Brian Haddock, or Doug Murtland, but
> I’m not feeling the motivation this morning.
>
> But, outside of this topic, I think you’ll find
> me to be a perfectly rational, trustworthy, and
> loyal person. It’s taken a LOT to get me to
> where I am right now, and no, there’s not going
> to be any “mercy” for those who took advantage
> of what Sil started.
>
> Have a great day, everyone. In addition to a
> Veterinarian appointment, I have a lot to do
> today.
Attachments:
1291408044433.png

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Hindsight is Rarely 20/20
Posted by: Scott Lehman ()
Date: August 13, 2012 10:00AM

..



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 08/20/2012 05:46PM by Scott Lehman.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Hindsight is Rarely 20/20
Posted by: Joe Friday ()
Date: August 13, 2012 09:08PM

Scott Lehman Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> “Joe Friday” asked several questions last
> night. They almost sound sincere. Despite my
> belief that he actually posed them to make
> insinuations, I’ll give him a bit of an answer.
>
> No, you don’t need details about my day, or my
> kids’ days. They had parties to attend both
> days, and since not all of them were together,
> much of the weekend was dedicated to shuttling
> them around.
>
> One of the parties was hosted by someone who was
> – I think – the second person I called when
> all of this began. He was actually high on my
> list to because he’s with one of the armed
> Federal services, and he understands my humor, at
> least a bit. He couldn’t help that morning, but
> he was up-front about it. I didn’t really get
> an explanation until yesterday, and it still makes
> me laugh. He said “it seemed like you were
> threatening to bring down the internet, and I know
> you well enough that I was worried you could do
> it.” I laugh because he gives me far too much
> credit, and because it makes perfect sense.
> Anyway, we’re already talking about our next
> “kids-swap/sleepover” thing.
>
> So no, the people who actually know me, and know a
> bit of the story don’t seem to be overly
> concerned. This whole thing, including the
> insinuations here, have forced my kids to grow up
> a lot in the last two months. I’ll always
> resent the time that was lost, but it’s been a
> “growth experience”, of sorts, for all of us.
>
> I’ll be a little while deciding how to proceed.
> I have a lot of calls to make, records to collect,
> and people to talk to.
>
> But as of this morning, one thing is clearer…
> “Sil” (an acronym, not a name) isn’t going
> to help my family put things back together.
> That’s really unfortunate, since I think it was
> Sil’s actions and inactions that made everything
> possible. Because of secondary considerations,
> there’s a “sub-clause” in that part of the
> story that I’m going to try to pause to attempt
> to understand. And because of tertiary
> considerations, I probably won’t be discussing a
> lot of specifics about any of that.
>
> But, “Sil” knows Brian. I haven’t been able
> to ask if they’ve had any contact in this…
> Sil, like some others, won’t respond to direct
> questions at all, though she’s discussed it with
> people that haven’t been mentioned here, it
> seems.
>
> I have to move forward, assuming the worst in all
> cases. Every bit of “truth” has made this
> seem more manageable. But the final realization,
> I think, is that the truth would’ve stopped this
> from starting.
>
> Sil has a kid, too. I want to consider him in
> this, as well. Again, if I know the truth, it’s
> my hope that there’s reason to exclude him.
> From the outset, Sil knew that I was “worked
> up”. She told others of me pacing the street at
> night… but what she didn’t tell is that I was
> weighing my options. Believing the orders from
> Mike were illegal, I was wondering: “if I
> ‘run’, will Sil call Mike? Will Mike
> follow-up? How far would Fairfax go to ‘get’
> me, and if I’m ‘running’, how easy would it
> to be to ‘accidentally’ shoot me?”
>
> My guess now is that Sil was trying to help. She
> knew if I knew the truth, I would’ve been on my
> way back home as soon as I could get my toothbrush
> back in my bag. So, she “stretched” things.
> How this included her offering to “call in
> sick” for me on my last day of work is beyond
> me, but again, Sil wasn’t willing to talk
> through anything with her crazy in-law. There
> were exchanges that could be described only as
> “passive aggressive”. There was a lot of
> frustration on my part, and I was cut off from
> everyone else, and all of this seemed to build her
> own belief that I “needed rest”. And I did.
> I just couldn’t get it in that place and under
> those circumstances.
>
> Anyway, for the last two months, Sil has just
> watched and read. She’s afraid that if she
> tells me the truth, I’ll get angry, and
> muck-rake her. I’m going to talk about her, for
> sure, but only in the context of this chapter in
> my family’s lives. I’ll probably speculate
> more because I don’t know… every now and then,
> someone here actually jumps in with two cents of
> input that’s worth a lot more. Of course, other
> trolls will dedicate themselves to distorting
> things... I guess everyone needs a hobby. I still
> want to make sense of this, and I am infuriated
> that Sil still won’t give me the information I
> need to determine if there was ANY wrongdoing on
> the part of Mike Ricker, or the County. So, I
> have to assume there was none. I’m sure I’ll
> talk about that weekend as I continue trying to
> make sense of it, but it appears that speculation
> will be all that I have to work with.
>
> This is going to get expensive. Unfortunately,
> the only way through this for me, it seems, is
> “forward”. I need the truth to put the last
> two months into context. I’m guessing Sil has
> had to fill out an e-QIP in recent years… she
> knows what I’m going to need to deal with, and
> why I’m going to need a solid explanation of
> what transpired here. No, it won’t stop me from
> passing a background check, but her lack of
> cooperation could still ruin my career.
>
> I don’t know what I’ll talk about here, or
> when. I’m certainly not done with Susan
> Mitchell, Brian Haddock, or Doug Murtland, but
> I’m not feeling the motivation this morning.
>
> But, outside of this topic, I think you’ll find
> me to be a perfectly rational, trustworthy, and
> loyal person. It’s taken a LOT to get me to
> where I am right now, and no, there’s not going
> to be any “mercy” for those who took advantage
> of what Sil started.
>
> Have a great day, everyone. In addition to a
> Veterinarian appointment, I have a lot to do
> today.


Yes Scott, they were sincere. As the saying goes, "I have one nerve left". Yep yep, it's my last one. Do you want to step on it, or use it to your advantage in seeking help.

Who knows..maybe I'll grow some more tonight. Sure could use some in order to keep visiting this site and all your "please help me", and then when your offered help, you pretty much tell us all to Fuck Off.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Hindsight is Rarely 20/20
Posted by: WHY IS THIS SHIT STARTING AGAIN! NOBODY FUCKING CARES! THIS MAKES ME ANGRY AND TYPE IN CAPSLOCK BY HOLDING THE SHIFT BUTTON>>>PLEAASE STOP AT ONCE POST HASTE! ()
Date: August 13, 2012 09:11PM

WHY IS THIS SHIT STARTING AGAIN! NOBODY FUCKING CARES! THIS MAKES ME ANGRY AND TYPE IN CAPSLOCK BY HOLDING THE SHIFT BUTTON>>>PLEAASE STOP AT ONCE POST HASTE!

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Hindsight is Rarely 20/20
Posted by: WHY IS THIS SHIT STARTING AGAIN! NOBODY FUCKING CARES! THIS MAKES ME ANGRY AND TYPE IN CAPSLOCK BY HOLDING THE SHIFT BUTTON>>>PLEAASE STOP AT ONCE POST HASTE! ()
Date: August 13, 2012 09:15PM

P>S> I DIN"T READ ANY OF THAT SHIT EITHER>>>

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Hindsight is Rarely 20/20
Posted by: Joe Friday ()
Date: August 13, 2012 09:25PM

Calm down. Caps are not good for your blood pressure.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Hindsight is Rarely 20/20
Posted by: 2concerned ()
Date: August 13, 2012 09:27PM

Joe:

What help do you think you can give? I'm honestly curious. The Mental Health system has looked at me, and not found me needing.

At one point, I was screaming for attention to stay safe. Again, it was based on what now appears to have been untrue from the start. Knowing that the cops aren't in fact, after me, and the only "danger" is from those I once trusted, I and my family are actually doing okay.

I've been in a holding pattern for some time... that's not the case anymore.

But really, if it all ends with advice that I should just keep my head down, stay quiet, and be happy that I was only taken from my family for a week, then I'm afraid it'll continue to fall on deaf ears.

Now, the whole "buy someone a beer" thing is largely to separate the trolls from anyone who actually have a genuine interest in me. Really, it's really not possible for anyone to get a lot of "insight" about me from these writings. Of course it started MUCH earlier, when I was actually inviting people over to see a tape that I didn't want to publish.

It's been a long, strange trip.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Hindsight is Rarely 20/20
Posted by: he losin it ()
Date: August 13, 2012 09:47PM

2concerned Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> it's really not possible for anyone to get a lot
> of "insight" about me from these writings.


that's the funniest thing that i've read in a long time. 3,000+ posts gives a lot of insight...whether it was all personal feelings or sarcasm, that is a lot of information with a lot of insight...especially when you were just naming random people that you found off the internet to be part of this larger "conspiracy". remember that chamberlain lady? among others. get a grip, scott.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Hindsight is Rarely 20/20
Posted by: Scott Lehman ()
Date: August 13, 2012 09:54PM

..



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/20/2012 05:45PM by Scott Lehman.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Hindsight is Rarely 20/20
Posted by: meh ()
Date: August 13, 2012 09:54PM

Scott Lehman Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I’m not feeling the motivation this morning.

"I'M GONNA DO IT, I'M GONNA DO IT"

"Oh, not today though. Maybe tomorrow."

lol ok
b(^_^)d

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Hindsight is Rarely 20/20
Posted by: lame excuse ()
Date: August 13, 2012 09:56PM

Scott Lehman Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> "chamberlain lady"...
>
> Yeah, that one was inspired by the number used for
> a "PrankDial.com" call.


yea right...that's what they all say.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Hindsight is Rarely 20/20
Posted by: Joe Friday ()
Date: August 13, 2012 10:58PM

2concerned Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Joe:
>
> What help do you think you can give? I'm honestly
> curious. The Mental Health system has looked at
> me, and not found me needing.
>
> At one point, I was screaming for attention to
> stay safe. Again, it was based on what now
> appears to have been untrue from the start.
> Knowing that the cops aren't in fact, after me,
> and the only "danger" is from those I once
> trusted, I and my family are actually doing okay.
>
> I've been in a holding pattern for some time...
> that's not the case anymore.
>
> But really, if it all ends with advice that I
> should just keep my head down, stay quiet, and be
> happy that I was only taken from my family for a
> week, then I'm afraid it'll continue to fall on
> deaf ears.
>
> Now, the whole "buy someone a beer" thing is
> largely to separate the trolls from anyone who
> actually have a genuine interest in me. Really,
> it's really not possible for anyone to get a lot
> of "insight" about me from these writings. Of
> course it started MUCH earlier, when I was
> actually inviting people over to see a tape that I
> didn't want to publish.
>
> It's been a long, strange trip.

Scott, I responded, to your post, that you made under "Scott Lehman". Please respond under said user name. I received this reply under a "2concerned" user name. Have a little respect, and you shall receive the same. Thanks.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Hindsight is Rarely 20/20
Posted by: Scott Lehman ()
Date: August 13, 2012 11:04PM

..



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 08/20/2012 05:44PM by Scott Lehman.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Hindsight is Rarely 20/20
Posted by: Hank Moody ()
Date: August 14, 2012 12:52AM

The medicine only works if you take it regularly.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Hindsight is Rarely 20/20
Posted by: Joe Friday ()
Date: August 14, 2012 12:58AM

@Hank. So true.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Hindsight is Rarely 20/20
Posted by: you are pathetic ()
Date: August 14, 2012 07:36AM

Sometimes the Gene pool needs a good clorox scrubbing to start anew with DNA that is not defective.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Hindsight is Rarely 20/20
Posted by: Another Fucking Scott Thread ()
Date: August 14, 2012 09:09AM

Scott, you are the saddest little diva attention whore ever. Another thread? Really?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Hindsight is Rarely 20/20
Posted by: Another Fucking Scott Thread ()
Date: August 14, 2012 09:09AM

Scott, you are the saddest little diva attention whore ever. Another thread? Really?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Hindsight is Rarely 20/20
Posted by: who the fuck cares ()
Date: August 14, 2012 09:46AM

Who the fuck cares!!!!

I'M GOING TO GO AND MASTURBATE!!!!

Options: ReplyQuote


Your Name: 
Your Email (Optional): 
Subject: 
Attach a file
  • No file can be larger than 75 MB
  • All files together cannot be larger than 300 MB
  • 30 more file(s) can be attached to this message
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 ********  **     **  **     **  **    **   ******  
 **    **  **     **  **     **  **   **   **    ** 
     **    **     **  **     **  **  **    **       
    **     **     **  *********  *****     **       
   **       **   **   **     **  **  **    **       
   **        ** **    **     **  **   **   **    ** 
   **         ***     **     **  **    **   ******  
This forum powered by Phorum.