MarcusTheSkeptic Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I deplore her. Not only for refusing to be a
> symbol of hope and courage to lesbians but also
> for distorting our views of society by her
> dishonesty.
>
> "It's time women in this country realize that
> women in this country can do any job they want
> to," she told USA Today shortly before her first
> launch."
>
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB100008723963904434
> 37504577545434253032986.html
>
> Thats a blatant lie. Not "women" did that job but
> a dyke, a lesbian. Someone who in a hugely
> important part of her life and personality felt
> and acted DRASTICALLY different from 95% of all
> those women she claimed to represent here and
> purposefully concealed it from them and the rest
> of the public.
>
> I have no problems with people living life anyway
> they want and hopefully makes them happy. But
> distorting reality, distorting gender differences
> by making "women" into role modeles who feel and
> are vastly different than the majority of people
> denominated by that word, is a disservice to
> humanity.
>
> How many of the other female astronauts, engineers
> and generelly career women who are often given as
> poster child role modeles especially to our young
> girls are really lesbians and as such represent a
> vastly different world of emotions and sentiments
> than those girls themselves in their overwhelmign
> majority?
>
> Is the whole picture of women wanting, even
> NEEDING to compete to strive for careers in
> usually mostly occupations saught by males perhaps
> totally wrong? Perhaps its only dykes..lesbian who
> strive really for that and perhaps a huge majority
> of hetero sexual women if not goaded into it by
> dishonest role models and demands by those
> different than them would be perfectly happy as
> the classical home maker archetype?
>
> What if we learned that 95% of male nursery and
> kindergarten teachers were gay? Wouldn't that
> change the view especially of young (heterosexual)
> boys about what career paths they should take,
> what might make them happy or what they feel?
>
> Long it has been argued by some that boys playing
> with trains and girls with dolls is mostly if not
> totally a social "training" and has nothing to do
> with biological foundations. Then if there is some
> truth to that how much more do such (false) role
> models influence children in their view what is
> good and appropriate for them, even what feels
> right?
Have an Appletini and relax Queenie. For some folks being gay isn't the overriding aspect of their lives like it is yours. She's still a woman even if she was gay. And sorry but, as much as you might want it to be true, 95% of the population isn't gay and most don't really give a damn one way or another about you or anyone else being gay.