I know it's early and polls don't mean dick, but if I was Obummer I'd be trying to line up some work on the Oprah Winfrey Network..

idontlikebeingrightaboutshitlikethisbutiam



Edited 21 time(s). Last edit at 5/31/1967 05:57AM by WingNut.

Last edit at 11/30/2015 01:37PM Last edit at 5/14/2015 03:52PM Last edit at 1/28/2014 05:57AM Last edit at 11/29/2015 01:10PM Last edit at 3/14/2011 11:52PM Last edit at 7/20/2012 04:07AM
Last edit at 6/29/2013 11:18PM Last edit at 3/19/2011 01:02PM Last edit at 3/26/2012 09:07PM

The beauty of this poll is that they called back the same people that they called the week before so they could measure the affect of the gay marriage support that Obama embraced much more precisely. A 5 point swing. And that's in a poll that oversamples democrats. The real damage is probably an 8 - 10 point swing. Ouch.

Barry got some very bad advice. When millions are scratching around for a job, any job he worries that gays cant get married. While gay marriage may be first on George Looneys list it is far removed from any list by the flyover Americans.

Periscope UP! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The beauty of this poll is that they called back
> the same people that they called the week before


But that is not how polls work. If they did, they would be sent to poll taker prison.

This is a NYT poll so you can just imagine they added about ten points to Obama to begin with. Bad news for the free stuff crowd.

free cheese Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> This is a NYT poll so you can just imagine they
> added about ten points to Obama to begin with. Bad
> news for the free stuff crowd.

BAD NEWS FOR ROMNEY

Overall Views of the Candidates
(Among registered voters)
Obama Romney
Now April Now April
Favorable 45% 42% 31% 29%
Unfavorable 45 45 38 34


President Obama’s Job Approval Rating
Now 4/2012 2/2012 1/2012 5/2011 11/2010 4/2010
Approve 50% 48% 50% 47% 57% 45% 51%
Disapprove 48 42 43 45 37 45 39

Periscope UP! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The beauty of this poll is that they called back
> the same people that they called the week before
> so they could measure the affect of the gay
> marriage support that Obama embraced much more
> precisely. A 5 point swing.

Margin of Error is a whoping 4.5%.

Romney will win both the female vote and the gay vote because his sons are such hotties.

Who wouldn't want to get gang banged by that?

WingNut Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> >
> I know it's early and polls don't mean dick, but
> if I was Obummer I'd be trying to line up some
> work on the Oprah Winfrey Network..
Attachments:

What does Fox news have to do with a CBS and New York Times poll?

Yucky24. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> http://img.ezinemark.com/imagemanager2/files/30011
> 306/2012/01/2012-01-05-15-07-33-2-josh-joe-taggs-s
> on-craig-tagg-and-matt-in.jpeg
>
> Who wouldn't want to get gang banged by that?


The 12 yo boy? I knew it, Yucky was a Pedo.

Libtards in LaLa Land Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What does Fox news have to do with a CBS and New
> York Times poll?


Zee critics of Fearless Leader and Party of Tolerance and Fairness must be ZILENCED!!!

He hates women unless they are SAHM. Please.

HeilBarry Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Libtards in LaLa Land Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > What does Fox news have to do with a CBS and
> New
> > York Times poll?
>
Nothing really, but it was funny.

if fox news Wrote:


That's Soledad O'Brien in one of those pics. She hasn't even worked for Fox.

How do the polls work? I mean... how do they select who they call? Are they limited to landlines? I remember that once upon a time, telemarketers weren't allowed to call cell phone numbers because the subscriber could incur costs. If that is still true, does it apply to polls? And if it applies to polls, how do they get a balanced group to complete the polls? I have a lot of friends that don't have a landline... I haven't had one in years. And it seems to me, younger people (and people without kids), who MAY be more likely to be liberal, are less likely to have a landline.

Genevieve Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> How do the polls work? I mean... how do they
> select who they call? Are they limited to
> landlines? I remember that once upon a time,
> telemarketers weren't allowed to call cell phone
> numbers because the subscriber could incur costs.
> If that is still true, does it apply to polls?
> And if it applies to polls, how do they get a
> balanced group to complete the polls? I have a
> lot of friends that don't have a landline... I
> haven't had one in years. And it seems to me,
> younger people (and people without kids), who MAY
> be more likely to be liberal, are less likely to
> have a landline.


Here's how it works...

When they're in Obama's favor, then they're gospel. Infallible. 100% representative.

When they're in Romney's favor, there must be some problem and people post theorires about landlines, etc., etc.

big gap Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Barry got some very bad advice. When millions are
> scratching around for a job, any job he worries
> that gays cant get married. While gay marriage may
> be first on George Looneys list it is far removed
> from any list by the flyover Americans.


Its actually good advise and just shows what a failure he has been. He HAS to try and turn this election into some social issue and desperately try and create issues that are completely irrelevant to this election in order to get the focus off the economy and his record.

He CANNOT run on his track record and if he cant create a new issue and get the focus off of him and what hes done and onto some hypotehtical issues where he can preach a bunch of BS like in 08 he loses.

I cant even imagine he would try to run on his economic record. He does take credit for GM which couldnt help but do good considering the taxpayer money Obama gave them. But Ford had a much better recovery and they didnt take a dime in bailout money so it kind of cancels out his claim to saving GM.

GM was poorly run and way over their head in worker benefits after being hijacked by the unions. Only Obamas infusion of huge amounts of money saved it from bankruptcy. The government should not be in the business of saving badly managed companies with taxpayer dollars.

Rcession what recession, I gots my dancing shoes on.
Attachments:

Yup..


Dingle Barry is playing a game of distract and blame.


Talking about ANYTHING but economics.


And when he talks about economics, it's to badmouth Mitt for being a corporate guy- all while ignoring Obama's own relationship with Wall St, Jon COrzine etc etc...

idontlikebeingrightaboutshitlikethisbutiam



Edited 21 time(s). Last edit at 5/31/1967 05:57AM by WingNut.

Last edit at 11/30/2015 01:37PM Last edit at 5/14/2015 03:52PM Last edit at 1/28/2014 05:57AM Last edit at 11/29/2015 01:10PM Last edit at 3/14/2011 11:52PM Last edit at 7/20/2012 04:07AM
Last edit at 6/29/2013 11:18PM Last edit at 3/19/2011 01:02PM Last edit at 3/26/2012 09:07PM

free cheese Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I cant even imagine he would try to run on his
> economic record. He does take credit for GM which
> couldnt help but do good considering the taxpayer
> money Obama gave them. But Ford had a much better
> recovery and they didnt take a dime in bailout
> money so it kind of cancels out his claim to
> saving GM.
>
> GM was poorly run and way over their head in
> worker benefits after being hijacked by the
> unions. Only Obamas infusion of huge amounts of
> money saved it from bankruptcy. The government
> should not be in the business of saving badly
> managed companies with taxpayer dollars.

GM will be back in the same position at some time in the future since they never really changed anything.

Hes been nothing more than a celebrity president to this point and it really seems thats all he has to offer. He has a fundamental misunderstanding about how things really work and why the economy is responding how it has. Which really isnt surprising considering his picks for heads of things. Even some of his Czars are starting to turn on him economically.

But until the election we will continue to see more of him just trying to deflect off of real issues and create issues that he can turn on the charm with his hypothetical rethortic. His campaign will be nothing more than a slight of hand magic act where he distracts attention away from what is really happening to meaningless things pulling the wool over whoevers eyes want to be covered.

Nielsen Smeilson Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

>
> Here's how it works...
>
> When they're in Obama's favor, then they're
> gospel. Infallible. 100% representative.
>
> When they're in Romney's favor, there must be some
> problem and people post theorires about landlines,
> etc., etc.


Perhaps you should try that with someone that is claiming the polls are biased instead of someone asking how they counter that type of issue to create balanced polls.

It's pretty clear that Romney is a religious conservative that would rather see women cranking out babies and staying at home. Even Romney's wife thinks being a stay at home mom is the correct place for a woman. She clearly spoke out on the issue.

K-mart Fan Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It's pretty clear that Romney is a religious
> conservative that would rather see women cranking
> out babies and staying at home. Even Romney's wife
> thinks being a stay at home mom is the correct
> place for a woman. She clearly spoke out on the
> issue.
lame

Apparently more and more women aren't buying that BS. lol

It doesn't matter. The issue is on the economy and the economy is doing better under Obama than Bush.

YoMama Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> K-mart Fan Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > It's pretty clear that Romney is a religious
> > conservative that would rather see women
> cranking
> > out babies and staying at home. Even Romney's
> wife
> > thinks being a stay at home mom is the correct
> > place for a woman. She clearly spoke out on
> the
> > issue.
> lame
>
> Apparently more and more women aren't buying that
> BS. lol


Nothing like insulting every stay at home mom around the country.

The left doesnt want stay at home moms, they want women like Julia who have to be supported by the government their whole life and cant do anything on their own so when they retire they can work at a community garden.

After all if they can help themselves the left loses some of its voting base

Genevieve Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Nielsen Smeilson Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> >
> > Here's how it works...
> >
> > When they're in Obama's favor, then they're
> > gospel. Infallible. 100% representative.
> >
> > When they're in Romney's favor, there must be
> some
> > problem and people post theorires about
> landlines,
> > etc., etc.
>
>
> Perhaps you should try that with someone that is
> claiming the polls are biased instead of someone
> asking how they counter that type of issue to
> create balanced polls.


Perfect example:

http://youtu.be/oTzfJCCGpDI

Genevieve Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Perhaps you should try that with someone that is
> claiming the polls are biased instead of someone
> asking how they counter that type of issue to
> create balanced polls.


To accurately predict election results, you have to choose an appropriately balanced representative sample.

"Likely voters" are better (produce more accurate results) than "registered voters," although registered voters are a more accurate indicator than adults.

Next, the sample should try to accurately reflect the likely turnout of Democrat, Republican, and Indepedent voters. If a poll oversamples Democrats or Republicans, its predictive value will be reduced (although its propaganda value may be increased!).

Similarly, to achieve maximum accuracy the poll should seek to reflect gender, age and geographic differences among the electorate.

In a presidential poll, the central question is so straightforward - "Who do you plan to vote for, Obama or Romney?" - that there's not a lot of room for game-playing.

But in more opinion-oriented polls, the way a question is asked can have a huge effect on the outcome; and there is no doubt but that many pollsters will deliberately frame a question in a way that will give them the polling results they want, to help them advance their political agenda.

In a 2003 NBC/Wall Street Journal poll, the question was asked: "Which of the following best represents your views about abortion -- the choice of an abortion should be left up to the woman and her doctor, abortion should only be legal in cases when pregnancy results from rape or incest or when the life of the woman is at risk, or abortion should be legal in all circumstances?"

The answers showed that 53% of the public felt abortion was a decision best left up to the woman and her doctor. Only 15% felt it should be illegal in all circumstances, with 29% want to have exceptions. Thus, a majority appeared to support abortion rights for women.

Compare that result to a poll earlier that year by Fox News/Opinion Dynamics: "Once a woman is pregnant, do you believe the unborn baby or fetus should have all the rights as a newborn baby?" Nearly 60% of the public said yes, the unborn fetus should have the same rights as a newborn baby. Only 26% said no. According to this poll, a strong majority wants to protect the rights of the unborn.

So what is the American position on abortion? Clearly, the answer depends on the wording of the question, specifically on whether respondents are asked to focus on the rights of women or the rights of the unborn.
Gateways to Democracy: An Introduction to American Government, pp. 185-86.

Oops, bad link.

Corrected: Gateways to Democracy

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2012/election_2012_presidential_election/north_carolina/election_2012_north_carolina_president

Absolutely love the way the republicans are running around like little ants in this campaign season. Goes to show that Romney is such a weak candidate with a weak platform.

The "war on women" is a major issue... laughable.

Psycho Republicans Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Absolutely love the way the republicans are
> running around like little ants in this campaign
> season. Goes to show that Romney is such a weak
> candidate with a weak platform.
>
> The "war on women" is a major issue... laughable.


I don't think you're following the plot line. You'll figure it out when the movie's over. lmao

Ohhhh! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Psycho Republicans Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Absolutely love the way the republicans are
> > running around like little ants in this
> campaign
> > season. Goes to show that Romney is such a
> weak
> > candidate with a weak platform.
> >
> > The "war on women" is a major issue...
> laughable.
>
>
> I don't think you're following the plot line.
> You'll figure it out when the movie's over. lmao


If theres one thing radiophilie has consistently proved, its that he will never figure anything out.

For what its worth thats the only thing hes ever proved

K-mart Fan Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It's pretty clear that Romney is a religious
> conservative that would rather see women cranking
> out babies and staying at home. Even Romney's wife
> thinks being a stay at home mom is the correct
> place for a woman. She clearly spoke out on the
> issue.


And if you get the truth from women they would prefer to stay at home and take it easy while the husband deals with the working world hell. I have heard it from many of my female co workers they want a guy to support them and ditch the 9-5 shit. These are women who have good careers and make 100k a year. They are just trying to figure out how to keep their upper middle class lifestyle on one income.

This does not include the dykes who want to be out there showing the men who has a bigger dick.

He won big right?