Occupiers Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> lululs Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Occupiers Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > horseshoe Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > Occupiers Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > wutwut,
> > > > >
> > > > > Digging deeper, we find this from the FBI
> > > > arrest
> > > > > affidavits:
> > > > >
> > > > > The FBI affidavit in support of the
> arrests
> > > > makes
> > > > > multiple references to “one
> percenters”
> > > > > “corporations” and the “May 1st”
> > > > protests
> > > > > associated with the Occupy movement.
> > > > >
> > > > > LOL. Tea Party indeed.
> > > > >
> > > > > Congrats on winning "Retard of the Day"
> > > award.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Why do you think they support Obama? 1%s
> > doing
> > > > pretty good under Obama. The political
> > > spectrum
> > > > is like a horse shoe. The ends are closer
> in
> > > > ideology than they are to the middle.
> > Anarchist
> > > > and Tea Partiers share a lot in common.
> > >
> > >
> > > Anarchists and Tea Partiers do not share a
> lot
> > in
> > > common beyond being idiots. Something you
> can
> > > obviously relate to. At what point was it
> > > asserted that the Occupiers support Obama?
> It
> > was
> > > asserted that Democratic leaders endorsed and
> > > supported the Occupiers. Please, no matter
> how
> > > many times you have to move your lips to read
> > the
> > > sentences, try to follow along.
> >
> > LOL...You mad bro?! That's cool. Pretty bush
> > league in the inter-web world though. But that
> is
> > what FFU is pretty much full of now...little
> big
> > men. Funny thing was that if you stopped at the
> > first sentence I would have conceded that we
> agree
> > and drinks on me. Ohh well...
>
>
> Why would I be mad? I am not the one with the
> reading comprehension problem.
>
> Oh, I get it, you think that by asking me if I am
> mad that you somehow redeemed your previous
> stupidity. Thanks for confirming it.
Since your internet evolution is stuck in 2005. I shall submit the an appropriated 2005 response.
Attachments: