Truth4ThePeople Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I'll just deal with the first line of BS because
> the rest are complete BS also.
>
> The reason the US credit rating was downgraded was
> because REPUBLICANS didn't want to pass a budget
> amendment.
>
> Watch and learn-
>
>
Uh. no... It was primarily because the agreement that was finally made fell short and that they have little confidence in the ability of the government to actually deal with the issues. The concern regarding growing spending and debt has been reiterated in later updates. Maybe you should read the actual downgrade reports instead of watching Maddow:
United States of America Long-Term Rating
Lowered To 'AA+' On Political Risks And
Rising Debt Burden; Outlook Negative
Overview
• We have lowered our long-term sovereign credit rating on the United
States of America to 'AA+' from 'AAA' and affirmed the 'A-1+' short-term
rating.
• We have also removed both the short- and long-term ratings from
CreditWatch negative.
• The downgrade reflects our opinion that the fiscal consolidation plan
that Congress and the Administration recently agreed to falls short of
what, in our view, would be necessary to stabilize the government's
medium-term debt dynamics.
• More broadly, the downgrade reflects our view that the effectiveness,
stability, and predictability of American policymaking and political
institutions have weakened at a time of ongoing fiscal and economic
challenges to a degree more than we envisioned when we assigned a
negative outlook to the rating on April 18, 2011.
• Since then, we have changed our view of the difficulties in bridging the
gulf between the political parties over fiscal policy, which makes us
pessimistic about the capacity of Congress and the Administration to be
able to leverage their agreement this week into a broader fiscal
consolidation plan that stabilizes the government's debt dynamics any
time soon.
• The outlook on the long-term rating is negative. We could lower the
long-term rating to 'AA' within the next two years if we see that less
reduction in spending than agreed to, higher interest rates, or new
fiscal pressures during the period result in a higher general government
debt trajectory than we currently assume in our base case.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/documents/spratingreport_080611.pdf