You can get BC for $9 a month at Target. Is that really so much you want to violate the 1st amendment rights of the church?

That's 324 dollars for 3 years. That's one handbag.

They should just have anal sex instead.

Hey, I'd like to drive a Porsche! It's my constitutional right to drive a Porsche; therefore it's my constitutional right to have you help pay for it.

Sounds cool to me...

socialsmoker Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You can get BC for $9 a month at Target. Is that
> really so much you want to violate the 1st
> amendment rights of the church?
>
> That's 324 dollars for 3 years. That's one
> handbag.


She said it costs her $3,000 a year, if thats for condoms she is one busy woman

This is Green Justice

wrap it up Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

>
>
> She said it costs her $3,000 a year, if thats for
> condoms she is one busy woman


Only way thats possible is with some abortions mixed in. Thats over 200 bucks a month

socialsmoker Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You can get BC for $9 a month at Target. Is that
> really so much you want to violate the 1st
> amendment rights of the church?
>
> That's 324 dollars for 3 years. That's one
> handbag.


I bet it's even cheaper at the Georgetown University pharmacy.

http://www.georgetownuniversityhospital.org/body.cfm?id=228

socialsmoker Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You can get BC for $9 a month at Target. Is that
> really so much you want to violate the 1st
> amendment rights of the church?
>
> That's 324 dollars for 3 years. That's one
> handbag.


Dude, stop your bitching! a fucking broad on BC is a good deal, try fucking a woman not on BC. condoms suck, it's like eating a steak with a balloon on your tongue.
fuck, i have no problem paying for that. praise the women on BC.

also, fuck the church! just who the fuck do they think they are? they take in billions and pay no taxes! fuck the church!

Assman Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> They should just have anal sex instead.




+1


...or give epic titty fucks.

Blessed are the murderous.

If those women can afford over $45,000 a year for tuition to Georgetown Law school, plus room and board, they can afford birth control. Why should some poor working guy pay for their birth control when they're richer than some poor working slob can ever hope to be?

SunBonnetSue Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If those women can afford over $45,000 a year for
> tuition to Georgetown Law school, plus room and
> board, they can afford birth control. Why should
> some poor working guy pay for their birth control
> when they're richer than some poor working slob
> can ever hope to be?


You don't get laid much do you? a woman on birth control is worth the price..trust me.

John Holmes Wrote:

> You don't get laid much do you? a woman on birth
> control is worth the price..trust me.


And shell be on it either way, shes just jumping at an opportunity to try and get it for free. Shes a Georgetown Law student not some mother barely scrapping by trying to put food on the table for her kids

SunBonnetSue Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If those women can afford over $45,000 a year for
> tuition to Georgetown Law school, plus room and
> board, they can afford birth control. Why should
> some poor working guy pay for their birth control
> when they're richer than some poor working slob
> can ever hope to be?




It would be interesting to see how many students are using loans to attend Georgetown Law. I don't think the overwhelming majority of students at Georgetown have affluent backgrounds.

Blessed are the murderous.

eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

>
>
> It would be interesting to see how many students
> are using loans to attend Georgetown Law. I don't
> think the overwhelming majority of students at
> Georgetown have affluent backgrounds.

If they are so poor they cant afford marginal expenses outside of school they overstretched their means going there big time and should have picked a different school if those student loans are so far outside of their means they wont be able to pay them back.

Theres less people with poor backgrounds there than you would think. While the average student may not be rich I highly doubt theres many people there who will be living in their car while they attend. Its about 70k a year to go there and live on campus with 25 percent of students receiving financial aid from the law school itself. "Last year, 557 out of 1,990 total students received grant money. Fewer part-time students received aid (only 10 out of 385 last year) than full-time students (547 out of 1,605)"

According to the planned parenthood website they cost 15-50 dollars a month. Which would also be 5 times less than the student trying to get it paid for by others claims.



By the way just for fun check out the guy who got in with a 126 LSAT and a 2.1 GPA
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/stats.php?school=georgetown

Sorry 1/5th of the cost not 5 times less before someone decides to troll on that typo

How do feminists react to all this.

On the one hand, you'd think they'd back Fluke. Why, hell, she is a woman, right?

However, what this whole Fluke kerfuffle reveals is that women are helpless, and can't compete in this world without government assistance.

Can you imagine a man testifying on Pelosi's panel saying the same thing.

;)
Attachments:

To be quite honest, I find it HILARIOUS that the Catholic Church is the loudest voice in making sure there are more unwanted children around...........

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/ten-new-clergy-sex-abuse-victims-file-suit-against-roman-catholic-diocese-of-great-falls-billings-montana-from-kosnoff-fasy-pllc-2012-02-08


but honestly, let's talk about the most important part of this thread that nobody has of yet even mentioned.................................

WHAT THE FUCK DOES THIS HAVE TO DO WITH FAIRFAX COUNTY!?!?!?!

Do you not realize that birth control has medical benefits aside from preventing pregnancy? Or are you just ignoring obvious facts out of convenience?

Maybe Catholic universities like Notre Dame should stop teaching Evolution while they are at it.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

has nothing to do with "medical benefits"
has EVERYTHING to do with taking freedom of choice over yr own body away from women just cause you dont like what you THINK they are doing strickly based on YOUR religious beliefs.........kinda like these guys.........

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NFBsVbwBgLU&oref=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Furl%3Fsa%3Dt%26rct%3Dj%26q%3D%26esrc%3Ds%26source%3Dweb%26cd%3D4%26cts%3D1330778889787%26ved%3D0CDoQFjAD%26url%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.youtube.com%252Fwatch%253Fv%253DNFBsVbwBgLU%26ei%3DBBNST-bpArL_sQK78JjwBQ%26usg%3DAFQjCNF4eLsKWL-qrBe0bhG8DWvDe3W0dA&has_verified=1



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/03/2012 07:50AM by Gordon Blvd.

The religious beliefs of a bunch of old, white and celibate men trump the religious beliefs of their female parishioners.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

Gordon Blvd Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> has nothing to do with "medical benefits"
> has EVERYTHING to do with taking freedom of choice
> over yr own body away from women just cause you
> dont like what you THINK they are doing strickly
> based on YOUR religious beliefs.........kinda like
> these guys.........

But the logical extension of this argument is: we all have the right to do whatever we want with our bodies and have those activities specifically subsidized at others' expense.
Here's a list of some of those activities that we have the right to do with our own bodies:
1. Use my body to drive a Porsche
2. Use my body to eat ice cream
3. Use my body to _______

You get the point. If we go this route, then out of fairness to everyone we have to subsidize everyone's aspirations, not just those who like to fuck.

This War in Women is going to sink the GOP in November. Soccer moms are an important swing vote. Thank you, Rush, Santorum, GOP leadership for this gift.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

@Berdhuis.....yeah - those who like to fuck o_0
@Tone - speaking of Santorum.........LoLz



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/03/2012 09:30AM by Gordon Blvd.
Attachments:

Gordon Blvd Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> @Berdhuis.....yeah - those who like to fuck o_0
> @Tone - speaking of Santorum.........LoLz


o_0 - that all you got?



Lolz

WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Maybe Catholic universities like Notre Dame should
> stop teaching Evolution while they are at it.


Why? If they choose to teach evolution, that's their right. Just like if they choose to offer BC. The issue is the government FORCING THEM to like the liberals and this bitch Fluke are trying to do.

Religous based institutions are allowed, per a recent Supreme Court decision, to hire or fire based on their beliefs. If'd they'd screen their employees and let them know up front that while the Gov't requires us to have insurance that provides you with free birth control, we do not believe in it's use and you must share our beliefs to be employed her. Problem solved. They can also fire all of their employees who don't feel the same way. Perfectly legal. What's the problem? Oh. I know, THEY don't want to have to screen their employees by whether or not they share the same beliefs! This is yet another example of GOP politics at its best.

My grandma was married off (not her choice) at 14, to an older guy. She had 12 kids, and the last one (my mom) she had such a difficult birth that she got the recommendation that she did not have any more kids. She was 31. Since she had no access to birth control (catholic country), it meant no sex, so gramps left her behind with all the kids and no job, no education. He found a younger woman. She died of a heart condition at 49.
If the GOP rules this country that is going to be my daughter's life.
Besides, I would gladly pay for free birth control for anyone who wants it rather than more police, more jails, more drug rehab, etc... Take a quick look at "freakonomics" and the inverse correlation between crime and abortion. No woman should be forced to have unwanted kids because she can't afford birth control. Maybe it is not the case of a law student, but she is speaking for all women. With a few exceptions like Santorum's wife or Limbaugh's wives.

Mom bear Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> My grandma was married off (not her choice) at 14,
> to an older guy. She had 12 kids, and the last one
> (my mom) she had such a difficult birth that she
> got the recommendation that she did not have any
> more kids. She was 31. Since she had no access to
> birth control (catholic country), it meant no sex,
> so gramps left her behind with all the kids and no
> job, no education. He found a younger woman. She
> died of a heart condition at 49.
> If the GOP rules this country that is going to be
> my daughter's life.
> Besides, I would gladly pay for free birth control
> for anyone who wants it rather than more police,
> more jails, more drug rehab, etc... Take a quick
> look at "freakonomics" and the inverse correlation
> between crime and abortion. No woman should be
> forced to have unwanted kids because she can't
> afford birth control. Maybe it is not the case of
> a law student, but she is speaking for all women.
> With a few exceptions like Santorum's wife or
> Limbaugh's wives.


So wait, the republicans are going to legalize forced marriage, and of minors as well? Do you liberals get off on being incredibly dishonest? They are going to ban BC as well? REally, in the batshit insane liberal mind, that if you don't get something paid for by someone else, it is the same as banning it?

BATSHIT INSANE LIBERAL alert.

Mom bear Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> My grandma was married off (not her choice) at 14,
> to an older guy. She had 12 kids,

Dear mom, they know what causes women to have kids these days. If you feel so guilty then dont wait for the government to hand out freebies pay for it out of your pocket. Walmart five bucks a month, surely you can pony up enough to help a few poor women out or are you just generous with other peoples money?

"gramps left her behind with all the kids and no job, no education. He found a younger woman. She died of a heart condition at 49.
If the GOP rules this country that is going to be my daughter's life."

Now you blame Republicans for women getting divorced. How about women who run their mouths all day and sit on a couch eating ice cream and getting fat and bitchy. Or are you blaming Republicans for that.

Funny how liberalism always enables really bad behavior. Check out this study, no doubt liberals will insist that girls will start using condoms again if the state gives them more money than their boyfriends do.

http://abcnews.go.com/Health/teen-girls-condoms-receiving-money-boyfriends/story?id=15803558

Kinda of funny how obongo has the time to call up a 30 year old slut but not the families of soldiers that were killed. Nice priorities he has.

fuck this world and everyone in it!

Is she arguing for taxpayer funding for birth control or for it to be covered in her insurance plan that she is already paying for? There seem to be several issues here that are being lumped together. I expect this from Limbaugh, whose purpose is to stir controversy and boost ratings, but the various arguments I've read against her seem to be following the same confused track.

Mr. Rogers Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Is she arguing for taxpayer funding for birth
> control or for it to be covered in her insurance
> plan that she is already paying for? There seem
> to be several issues here that are being lumped
> together. I expect this from Limbaugh, whose
> purpose is to stir controversy and boost ratings,
> but the various arguments I've read against her
> seem to be following the same confused track.


Shes arguing for it to be free basically. Since she is at a catholic school (although thats debatable with gtown) the argument is actually the same for this instance. Since Obamas great compromise is that it would be covered free so they wouldnt be paying for it, she is essentially arguing for other people to pay for it for her which everyone else would since you have to be the most naive person on earth to think insurance companies will just eat the extra cost.

Really nothing she said was true. Birth control isnt 3000 a year for porn stars much less normal people. If she paid that much she was also using abortions as birth control. She had no business being brought in in the first place. She isnt an expert on anything and was just used as a cheap political play to try and parade her out there like shes some victim conveniently ignoring the fact that shes at a top law school in the country and will probably be a target of OWS one day. All she was speaking of is personal experience, the accuracy of which is HIGHLY debatable.

She's calling for the university, despite religious objections, and the first amendment, to be required to supply BC with its insurance that it offers. If she had her own insurance she was paying for from elsewhere she would be getting it covered. But she's asking for the first amendment to get violated. Well, the entire thing of forcing any school, employer, or insurer to offer anything, and at what cost, violated the 10th amendment to begin with.

The whole thing was an act, it wasn't even a real congressional session, just some democrat thing made to look like a real hearing. She lies about the cost of BC. She could go to target and it would cost $9 a month or free at planned parenthood. They were hoping conservatives would call them out on it, and so obama steps in, apologizes, and to "fix" this he will violate the 1st and 10th amendments by requiring universities to provide "free" birth control to women. Liberals are absolutley shameless. The constitution is meaningless to them now. They like the outcome, so it doesn't matter how they get there.

Actually, it has everything to do with medical benefits. Since birth control is used to treat all sorts of stuff besides actual contraception, what you fuckwits are saying is that because of your religious hangups, women may not have access to necessary medical care.

I swear the only difference between American conservatives and the Taliban is that one of them eats bacon.

So true. Why in 2012 are we still discussing women's birth control rights? Our country is in the shit can but Republicns want to discuss birth control. The Republicans are just like Rush. Fat cats out of touch. They are wrong.

I object on moral grounds to being paid to treat your lung cancer.

This isn't about the money, and you troglodytes know it. It's about a bunch of misogynistic antideluvian white guys condemning women for having sex. And you hypocrites would be the first in line to buy Viagra, courtesy of insurance - hell, you probably already need it.

socialsmoker1 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The whole thing was an act, it wasn't even a real
> congressional session, just some democrat thing
> made to look like a real hearing. She lies about
> the cost of BC. She could go to target and it
> would cost $9 a month or free at planned
> parenthood. They were hoping conservatives would
> call them out on it, and so obama steps in,
> apologizes, and to "fix" this he will violate the
> 1st and 10th amendments by requiring universities
> to provide "free" birth control to women. Liberals
> are absolutley shameless. The constitution is
> meaningless to them now. They like the outcome, so
> it doesn't matter how they get there.


What is so special about women and women's health issues that only they get medications for free? If I get prostate problems and need some medication, why do I have to pay for it? Why do I have to pay for heart medications? What is so special about women?

no way Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> wrap it up Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> >
> >
> > She said it costs her $3,000 a year, if thats
> for
> > condoms she is one busy woman
>
>
> Only way thats possible is with some abortions
> mixed in. Thats over 200 bucks a month


No she did not say a year, she said the term of law school which is 3-4 years for most people. Add the cost of the medicine and the doctor visits to get a prescription and transportation you can easily hit $3000.

But conservatives hear what someone did not say then they complain about what the person did not say. But that is what conservatives do. Mindless, just mindless.

Ha ha ha Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> So true. Why in 2012 are we still discussing
> women's birth control rights? Our country is in
> the shit can but Republicns want to discuss birth
> control. The Republicans are just like Rush. Fat
> cats out of touch. They are wrong.

Why in 2012 are people still unable to comprehend simple things after thousands and thousands of years of evolution?

NO ONE is saying she cant have birth control period. She is more than free to get it on her own or get her own individual insurance plan. Forcing a church to include it in their plans is a violation of the 1st amendment and goes against EVERYTHING this country was founded on.

Please sensational some more though

FU Limbaugh Wrote:

> No she did not say a year, she said the term of
> law school which is 3-4 years for most people. Add
> the cost of the medicine and the doctor visits to
> get a prescription and transportation you can
> easily hit $3000.
>
> But conservatives hear what someone did not say
> then they complain about what the person did not
> say. But that is what conservatives do. Mindless,
> just mindless.


That makes this even more insane theyre trying to say theyre going broke over under 10 dollars a month.

"Forty percent of the female students at Georgetown Law reported to us that they struggled financially as a result of this policy (Georgetown student insurance not covering contraception), Fluke reported."

Tell me one thing about this statement that is true. For under 10 dollars a month to go broke or "struggle" from that they would have to be so poor that they shouldnt be at a 60-90 grand a year law school in the first place, not spend money on anything except school, be eating ramen noodles every meal, have 1 pair of clothes, sleeping under park benches ect.

Her statements were complete bullshit that they are "struggling" financially over under 10 dollars a month. Theyre idea of struggling must mean it doesnt let them get an extra 10 coach purses.

the one thing no one is talking about is these institutions take federal dollars. They can do whatever they want if they truly become private and quit taking federal dollars. Until then don't blame the gov't for requiring coverage for everything including booty call protection.

simple soloutions guy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> the one thing no one is talking about is these
> institutions take federal dollars. They can do
> whatever they want if they truly become private
> and quit taking federal dollars. Until then don't
> blame the gov't for requiring coverage for
> everything including booty call protection.


Georgetown really isnt really a religious school anymore and hasnt been for quite sometime. The problem is that they were using this to try and say that all religious organizations should have to follow suit.

But aside from that the government shouldnt be requiring anything that is why you have different choices for what is covered when you get a plan. If you want more it costs more, she wants more without having to pay for it

I love that the GOP leaders are focused on attacking women and womens issues and not thinking about policy's to improve the economy.

Men hate condoms.

Where are the men who support the pill? Stand up!

Please support us.

You can't all be wimpy. Support women. Every women.

Unless you are rich and fat like Rush. I know he supports abortion. Four wives and no kids. I guess he was just too fat to fuck. His wife just blows.

-

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/04/2012 12:24PM by WashingTone-Locian.

no way Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> wrap it up Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> >
> >
> > She said it costs her $3,000 a year, if thats
> for
> > condoms she is one busy woman
>
>
> Only way thats possible is with some abortions
> mixed in. Thats over 200 bucks a month


That's a lot of fucking.