Keep your video cameras at the ready, and record everything these jack-booted thugs do. Post it online. Let's stop this horrible abuse of their police powers.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mFjQKcwbTdY&feature=g-all-f&context=G22f558eFAAAAAAAAAAA

Whatever.


Prob deserved it.

Entertaining video, looked like the Police were taking care of the trash we pay them to do, so we dont have to. Next time you are getting your ass beat on the subway, call your local gang member to help you. OP obviously has enjoyed the vail of protection in living in yuppie suburbia and has not been esposed to the real cruel world in other places where you can only hope the thugs fear the police.

REALLY ??? People wake up. Its not a problem until it happens to you. Look what happened yesterday in PG County

http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/2-prince-georges-county-officers-suspended-amid-investigation-into-shooting-in-brentwood/2012/02/07/gIQA7xo4vQ_story.html

Loudoun County Sheriff's Department is no better .......

http://www.loudountimes.com/index.php/news/article/28138/

what's your point Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> vail of protection

> esposed

lol

Every single person in that video that got an ass beating was fucking up. Why am I supposed to feel outraged that criminals and thugs are getting a little payback? Not only am I NOT upset by the Police behavior, I applaud it. I hope they beat more asses. We coddle criminals and worry too much about their feelings. If you fuck around then cops will beat your ass. It sounds fair to me.

justsayin Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> what's your point Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > vail of protection
>
> > esposed
>
> lol


Justsayin=spelling hall monitor, suburban douch who walks around with video camera in hand waiting for others who really trying to contribute, to do something they feel is wrong, Justsayin=professional watcher and never a doer ...lol

99% deserved. I just donated $100 to the FOP.

Black = deserves it. Duh.

I'm not going to argue with you who are in support of the police, or making slightly racist comments. But I'm calling it now, wait 10 years and see how you feel about the police. Their word is law, they call the shots, their side of the story is truth. See how that works out for you when it's your ass on the line.

But I'll be in Denmark or Canada or somewhere by then, America's going to shit fast.

Canada, Britain & U.S. Government want to Spy On Its Citizens’/ Electronic Communications?

The Canadian (Commons recent Bill C-30) would—give any Canadian police officer without a warrant—the power to request Internet service providers turn over customer information (see section 17 of C-30) cause the same loss of electronic privacy and civil liberties that British Government recently proposed—to spy on Brits’ electronic communications. Is it coincidence the British and Canadian proposals appear to mirror legislation U.S. Government said it wanted passed in 2011 to spy on U.S. Citizens?

Overlooked by mainstream media is that Britain and Canada signed with the U.S Government an array of (Asset Forfeiture Sharing Agreements) to share with Canadian and British Police/Governments assets seized from Brits, Canadians and Americans that resulted from e.g, evidence or information gleaned from electronic surveillance of Citizens’ communications, e.g., emails, faxes, Internet actively, phone records including GPS tracking.

Compare with U.S. Government’s proposal to electronically monitor, spy on Americans without a warrant—with Canada’s recent eavesdropping (Bill C-30) and British Government’s plan to spy on its Citizens’ electronic communications.

U.S. Government wants the power to (introduce as evidence) in criminal prosecutions and government civil trials, any phone call record, email or Internet activity. That would open the door for Police to take out of context any innocent—hastily written email, fax or phone call record to allege a crime or violation was committed to cause a person’s arrest, fines and or civil asset forfeiture of their property. There are more than 350 laws and violations that can subject property to government asset forfeiture. Government civil asset forfeiture requires only a civil preponderance of evidence for police to forfeit property, little more than hearsay.

If the U.S. Justice Department has its way, any information the FBI derives from circumventing the Fourth Amendment, i.e. (no warrant searches) of Web Server Records; a Citizen’s Internet Activity, personal emails; fax / phone calls may be used by the FBI for (fishing expeditions) to issue subpoenas in hopes of finding evidence or to prosecute Citizens for any alleged crime or violation. Consider that neither Congress nor the courts—determined what Bush II NSA electronic surveillance, perhaps illegal could be used by police or introduced into court by government to prosecute Americans criminally or civilly. If U.S. Justice Department is permitted (No-Warrant) surveillance of all electronic communications, it is problematic state and local law enforcement agencies and private government contractors will want access to prior Bush II NSA and other government illegally obtained electronic records not limited to—Americans’ Internet activity; private emails, faxes and phone calls to secure evidence to arrest Americans, assess fines and or civilly forfeit their homes, businesses and other assets under Title 18USC and other laws. Of obvious concern, what happens to fair justice in America if police become dependent on “Asset Forfeiture” to help pay their salaries and budget operating costs?

The “Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000” (effectively eliminated) the “five year statue of limitations” for Government Civil Asset Forfeiture: the statute now runs five years (from the date) police allege they “learned” an asset became subject to forfeiture. It is foreseeable should (no warrant) government electronic surveillance be approved; police will relentlessly sift through business and Citizen’s (government retained Internet data), emails and phone communications to discover possible crimes or civil violations. A corrupt despot U.S. Government can too easily use no-warrant—(seized emails, Internet data and phone call information) to blackmail Americans, corporations and others in the same manner Hitler utilized his police state passed laws to extort support for the Nazi fascist government, including getting parliament to pass Hitler’s 1933 Discriminatory Decrees that suspended the Constitutional Freedoms of German Citizens. A Nazi Government threat of “Property Seizure” Asset Forfeiture of an individual or corporation’s assets was usually sufficient to ensure Nazi support.

Under U.S. federal civil forfeiture laws, a person or business need not be charged with a crime for government to forfeit their property. Most U.S. Citizens, property and business owners that defend their assets against Government Civil Asset Forfeiture claim an “innocent owner defense.” This defense can become a criminal prosecution trap for both guilty and innocent property owners. Any fresh denial of guilt made to government when questioned about committing a crime “even when you did not do the crime” may (involuntarily waive) a defendant’s right to assert in their defense—the “Criminal Statute of Limitations” past for prosecution; any fresh denial of guilt even 30 years after a crime was committed may allow Government prosecutors to use old and new evidence, including information discovered during a Civil Asset Forfeiture Proceeding to launch a criminal prosecution. For that reason many innocent Americans, property and business owners are reluctant to defend their property and businesses against Government Civil Asset Forfeiture.

Re: waiving Criminal Statute of Limitations: see USC18, Sec.1001, James Brogan V. United States. N0.96-1579. U.S. See paragraph (6) at:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/96-1579.ZC1.html