Off-Topic :
Fairfax Underground
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Taking down a blog
Posted by:
Blue Suicide
()
Date: November 28, 2011 11:09PM
If a malcontent makes a blog containing libelous and slanderous remarks about someone else, how can the victim take the blog down?
Re: Taking down a blog
Posted by:
Court
()
Date: November 28, 2011 11:11PM
Civil suit
Re: Taking down a blog
Posted by:
H_I_D
()
Date: November 28, 2011 11:12PM
Blue Suicide Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If a malcontent makes a blog containing libelous
> and slanderous remarks about someone else, how can
> the victim take the blog down?
Are you Inkahootz and referring to the blog that eesh has created about you?
-------------------------------------------------------
> If a malcontent makes a blog containing libelous
> and slanderous remarks about someone else, how can
> the victim take the blog down?
Are you Inkahootz and referring to the blog that eesh has created about you?
Re: Taking down a blog
Posted by:
Blue Suicide
()
Date: November 28, 2011 11:12PM
Court Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Civil suit
For who? Do I sue google or the troll that made the blog? I think Google is just as guilty for keeping the blog up.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Civil suit
For who? Do I sue google or the troll that made the blog? I think Google is just as guilty for keeping the blog up.
Re: Taking down a blog
Posted by:
Blue Suicide
()
Date: November 28, 2011 11:12PM
H_I_D Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Blue Suicide Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > If a malcontent makes a blog containing
> libelous
> > and slanderous remarks about someone else, how
> can
> > the victim take the blog down?
>
>
> Are you Inkahootz and referring to the blog that
> eesh has created about you?
who is inkahootz?
-------------------------------------------------------
> Blue Suicide Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > If a malcontent makes a blog containing
> libelous
> > and slanderous remarks about someone else, how
> can
> > the victim take the blog down?
>
>
> Are you Inkahootz and referring to the blog that
> eesh has created about you?
who is inkahootz?
Re: Taking down a blog
Posted by:
Sue eesh
()
Date: November 28, 2011 11:16PM
Blue Suicide Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Court Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Civil suit
>
>
>
>
> For who? Do I sue google or the troll that made
> the blog? I think Google is just as guilty for
> keeping the blog up.
You can sue eesh in civil court for libel and slander. I doubt he would get a lawyer and pay just to keep up the blog. Forget suing google.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Court Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Civil suit
>
>
>
>
> For who? Do I sue google or the troll that made
> the blog? I think Google is just as guilty for
> keeping the blog up.
You can sue eesh in civil court for libel and slander. I doubt he would get a lawyer and pay just to keep up the blog. Forget suing google.
Re: Taking down a blog
Posted by:
Blue Suicide
()
Date: November 28, 2011 11:23PM
How much would it cost for me to sue eesh?
Re: Taking down a blog
Posted by:
H_I_D
()
Date: November 28, 2011 11:38PM
Blue Suicide Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> How much would it cost for me to sue eesh?
You might want to check with a few lawyers. Some might consider taking on the case "pro bono" just for the attention it will bring to their firm. This would mean that you wouldn't have to pay to sue eesh, but if you won, the lawyers might then want a fee, but not as great as you would have had to pay another firm that wasn't representing you at a free or reduced rate.
Attachments:
-------------------------------------------------------
> How much would it cost for me to sue eesh?
You might want to check with a few lawyers. Some might consider taking on the case "pro bono" just for the attention it will bring to their firm. This would mean that you wouldn't have to pay to sue eesh, but if you won, the lawyers might then want a fee, but not as great as you would have had to pay another firm that wasn't representing you at a free or reduced rate.
Attachments:
Re: Taking down a blog
Posted by:
Blog Reader
()
Date: November 28, 2011 11:43PM
Hey Blue...can you please post a link to the blog?
Re: Taking down a blog
Posted by:
JBass
()
Date: November 29, 2011 12:00AM
I would suggest knowing the difference between a blog and a forum, for starters.
Re: Taking down a blog
Posted by:
JAss is a fucking
()
Date: November 29, 2011 12:42AM
JAss u fucking drunk moron he's talking about the dumbass blog put up about pat
Re: Taking down a blog
Posted by:
Blog Reader
()
Date: November 29, 2011 01:13AM
OK, now that that is settled...can we have a link, please?
Re: Taking down a blog
Posted by:
Tim Osman
()
Date: November 29, 2011 01:19AM
Huh?
edit by Cary: CSS hacks in signature, second offense, user banned for 14 days, account disabled.
edit by Cary: CSS hacks in signature, second offense, user banned for 14 days, account disabled.
Re: Taking down a blog
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: November 29, 2011 11:44AM
LOL at Tim Osman for hiding this thread with CSS.
Blessed are the murderous.
Blessed are the murderous.
Re: Taking down a blog
Posted by:
kinda hott
()
Date: November 29, 2011 11:45AM
Patrick is hot..I would do him
Re: Taking down a blog
Posted by:
eesh suicide
()
Date: November 29, 2011 11:52AM
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> LOL at Tim Osman for hiding this thread with CSS.
"LOL" @ eesh for starting this thread as "blue suicide"
He must love the ink...
-------------------------------------------------------
> LOL at Tim Osman for hiding this thread with CSS.
"LOL" @ eesh for starting this thread as "blue suicide"
He must love the ink...
Re: Taking down a blog
Posted by:
Long-Winded Response
()
Date: November 29, 2011 03:13PM
Blue Suicide Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Court Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Civil suit
>
> For who? Do I sue google or the troll that made
> the blog? I think Google is just as guilty for
> keeping the blog up.
Unlike a normal lawsuit, where you'd sue whoever has the deepest pockets, in this case you'd want to sue whoever had the least ability to defend himself against the suit.
Google has very, very deep pockets and a roomful of lawyers, so you'd want to avoid naming them in the suit if you could. You should sue whoever put up the blog, if you can prove they are the author, because they're likely much less financially able to defend themselves. (Or, even better, they might refuse to answer the suit, resulting in a default judgement against them.)
Proving authorship, however, is a tricky business.
From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doe_subpoena
As an aside, Google says they will only remove a blog containing personal attacks or defamation with a court order, which the court will probably not issue unless you win your suit.
Lastly, read this article summarizing bringing an action for defamation:
http://www.expertlaw.com/library/personal_injury/defamation.html
-------------------------------------------------------
> Court Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Civil suit
>
> For who? Do I sue google or the troll that made
> the blog? I think Google is just as guilty for
> keeping the blog up.
Unlike a normal lawsuit, where you'd sue whoever has the deepest pockets, in this case you'd want to sue whoever had the least ability to defend himself against the suit.
Google has very, very deep pockets and a roomful of lawyers, so you'd want to avoid naming them in the suit if you could. You should sue whoever put up the blog, if you can prove they are the author, because they're likely much less financially able to defend themselves. (Or, even better, they might refuse to answer the suit, resulting in a default judgement against them.)
Proving authorship, however, is a tricky business.
From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doe_subpoena
Unmasking an anonymous online poster is a two-step process. First, the plaintiff must issue a subpoena to the hosting website requesting the IP address of the poster. Most websites collect and temporarily store the IP addresses of visitors in a web server log, although no U.S. law requires that they retain this information for any particular length of time.So, your first step is to file a suit naming "John Doe" as the plaintiff, then proceed as described above to actually determine who the person is. Once you know who the person is, then you amend your suit to name him. Once you have done so, you then serve him with notice that you are suing him, and he must respond, or face a default judgement.
If the website provides the poster's IP address, the plaintiff must then subpoena the ISP that owns the address. This second subpoena requests the contact information associated with the account of the computer to which the IP address was assigned at the time the post was made.
As an aside, Google says they will only remove a blog containing personal attacks or defamation with a court order, which the court will probably not issue unless you win your suit.
Lastly, read this article summarizing bringing an action for defamation:
http://www.expertlaw.com/library/personal_injury/defamation.html
Re: Taking down a blog
Posted by:
wanabe lawyer
()
Date: November 29, 2011 04:49PM
Long-Winded Response Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Blue Suicide Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Court Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Civil suit
> >
> > For who? Do I sue google or the troll that made
> > the blog? I think Google is just as guilty for
> > keeping the blog up.
>
> Unlike a normal lawsuit, where you'd sue whoever
> has the deepest pockets, in this case you'd want
> to sue whoever had the least ability to defend
> himself against the suit.
>
> Google has very, very deep pockets and a roomful
> of lawyers, so you'd want to avoid naming them in
> the suit if you could. You should sue whoever put
> up the blog, if you can prove they are the author,
> because they're likely much less financially able
> to defend themselves. (Or, even better, they might
> refuse to answer the suit, resulting in a default
> judgement against them.)
>
> Proving authorship, however, is a tricky
> business.
>
> From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doe_subpoena
> Unmasking an anonymous online poster is a two-step
> process. First, the plaintiff must issue a
> subpoena to the hosting website requesting the IP
> address of the poster. Most websites collect and
> temporarily store the IP addresses of visitors in
> a web server log, although no U.S. law requires
> that they retain this information for any
> particular length of time.
>
> If the website provides the poster's IP address,
> the plaintiff must then subpoena the ISP that owns
> the address. This second subpoena requests the
> contact information associated with the account of
> the computer to which the IP address was assigned
> at the time the post was made.
> So, your first step is to file a suit naming "John
> Doe" as the plaintiff, then proceed as described
> above to actually determine who the person is.
> Once you know who the person is, then you amend
> your suit to name him. Once you have done so, you
> then serve him with notice that you are suing him,
> and he must respond, or face a default judgement.
>
> As an aside, Google says they will only remove a
> blog containing personal attacks or defamation
> with a court order, which the court will probably
> not issue unless you win your suit.
>
> Lastly, read this article summarizing bringing an
> action for defamation:
> http://www.expertlaw.com/library/personal_injury/d
> efamation.html
FOr it to be defamation the negative information int he blog has to be false. if someone steals your wallet and you make a blog about the person being a theif because they stole your wallet then that's not defamation. If your going to sue the blog owner you better be sure that the bad things being said are not really true.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Blue Suicide Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Court Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Civil suit
> >
> > For who? Do I sue google or the troll that made
> > the blog? I think Google is just as guilty for
> > keeping the blog up.
>
> Unlike a normal lawsuit, where you'd sue whoever
> has the deepest pockets, in this case you'd want
> to sue whoever had the least ability to defend
> himself against the suit.
>
> Google has very, very deep pockets and a roomful
> of lawyers, so you'd want to avoid naming them in
> the suit if you could. You should sue whoever put
> up the blog, if you can prove they are the author,
> because they're likely much less financially able
> to defend themselves. (Or, even better, they might
> refuse to answer the suit, resulting in a default
> judgement against them.)
>
> Proving authorship, however, is a tricky
> business.
>
> From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doe_subpoena
> Unmasking an anonymous online poster is a two-step
> process. First, the plaintiff must issue a
> subpoena to the hosting website requesting the IP
> address of the poster. Most websites collect and
> temporarily store the IP addresses of visitors in
> a web server log, although no U.S. law requires
> that they retain this information for any
> particular length of time.
>
> If the website provides the poster's IP address,
> the plaintiff must then subpoena the ISP that owns
> the address. This second subpoena requests the
> contact information associated with the account of
> the computer to which the IP address was assigned
> at the time the post was made.
> So, your first step is to file a suit naming "John
> Doe" as the plaintiff, then proceed as described
> above to actually determine who the person is.
> Once you know who the person is, then you amend
> your suit to name him. Once you have done so, you
> then serve him with notice that you are suing him,
> and he must respond, or face a default judgement.
>
> As an aside, Google says they will only remove a
> blog containing personal attacks or defamation
> with a court order, which the court will probably
> not issue unless you win your suit.
>
> Lastly, read this article summarizing bringing an
> action for defamation:
> http://www.expertlaw.com/library/personal_injury/d
> efamation.html
FOr it to be defamation the negative information int he blog has to be false. if someone steals your wallet and you make a blog about the person being a theif because they stole your wallet then that's not defamation. If your going to sue the blog owner you better be sure that the bad things being said are not really true.
Re: Taking down a blog
Posted by:
Shorter and Sweeter Response
()
Date: November 29, 2011 05:08PM
wanabe lawyer Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> FOr it to be defamation the negative information
> int he blog has to be false. if someone steals
> your wallet and you make a blog about the person
> being a theif because they stole your wallet then
> that's not defamation. If your going to sue the
> blog owner you better be sure that the bad things
> being said are not really true.
This is correct. In order to pursue an action, the information in the blog must be untrue.
You need not prove they are untrue, however; the burden is on the defendant to prove that the statements he made are true. You can also introduce evidence proving the statements that the defendant made are untrue.
From http://www.citmedialaw.org/legal-guide/virginia-defamation-law:
-------------------------------------------------------
> FOr it to be defamation the negative information
> int he blog has to be false. if someone steals
> your wallet and you make a blog about the person
> being a theif because they stole your wallet then
> that's not defamation. If your going to sue the
> blog owner you better be sure that the bad things
> being said are not really true.
This is correct. In order to pursue an action, the information in the blog must be untrue.
You need not prove they are untrue, however; the burden is on the defendant to prove that the statements he made are true. You can also introduce evidence proving the statements that the defendant made are untrue.
From http://www.citmedialaw.org/legal-guide/virginia-defamation-law:
To be “actionable,” the statement must be a false statement of fact that harms the plaintiff's reputation in the community or deters other persons from associating with him or her.In short, you can't sue someone for defamation just because they published something in a blog that you didn't like if it's the truth.
Re: Taking down a blog
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: November 29, 2011 08:20PM
++
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/06/2013 10:44PM by eesh.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/06/2013 10:44PM by eesh.
Re: Taking down a blog
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: November 29, 2011 08:39PM
Harry Tuttle Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> lol...
>
> my photoshop made the cut...
It's a shame that your work is included in the blog Patrick started on Chuck. The blog definitely reads like the author learned English as a second language. Either that, or Patrick is on a fifth grade reading and writing level.
-------------------------------------------------------
> lol...
>
> my photoshop made the cut...
It's a shame that your work is included in the blog Patrick started on Chuck. The blog definitely reads like the author learned English as a second language. Either that, or Patrick is on a fifth grade reading and writing level.
Re: Taking down a blog
Posted by:
H_I_D
()
Date: November 29, 2011 08:46PM
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> LOL at Tim Osman for hiding this thread with CSS.
Eeshes is the smartz guy when it cumz to teknowlugy.
Attachments:
-------------------------------------------------------
> LOL at Tim Osman for hiding this thread with CSS.
Eeshes is the smartz guy when it cumz to teknowlugy.
Attachments:
Re: Taking down a blog
Posted by:
keep'em coming
()
Date: November 29, 2011 08:52PM
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Well, Chuck Hoffmann, Esquire to the rescue.
>
>
> A couple of things, everything I have said in my
> blog is true, and without a doubt certain people
> can testify to Patrick Larrieu's actions in real
> life. Second, Patrick Larrieu has decided to start
> (a rather comical) blog about my supposedo
> identity. Soooo......this pretty much blows any
> chance of him suing for damages, since he is doing
> the same thing he would be suing me for.
>
>
>
> Hey Chuck, have you read the blog Patrick started
> about you? Now, the stuff he said about you, THAT
> is libel and you ought to look into legal i
> against him. http://chuckhoffmann.blogspot.com/
All three of those blogs are obviously full of lies...I can't wait until the Nicholas Kowalczyk "the Xumwalts murdered my father in front of me...that's why I'm nuts" blog comes out.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Well, Chuck Hoffmann, Esquire to the rescue.
>
>
> A couple of things, everything I have said in my
> blog is true, and without a doubt certain people
> can testify to Patrick Larrieu's actions in real
> life. Second, Patrick Larrieu has decided to start
> (a rather comical) blog about my supposedo
> identity. Soooo......this pretty much blows any
> chance of him suing for damages, since he is doing
> the same thing he would be suing me for.
>
>
>
> Hey Chuck, have you read the blog Patrick started
> about you? Now, the stuff he said about you, THAT
> is libel and you ought to look into legal i
> against him. http://chuckhoffmann.blogspot.com/
All three of those blogs are obviously full of lies...I can't wait until the Nicholas Kowalczyk "the Xumwalts murdered my father in front of me...that's why I'm nuts" blog comes out.
Re: Taking down a blog
Posted by:
Blog Subject
()
Date: November 29, 2011 08:55PM
At first I wondered why all of a sudden I've got a blog about me.
Then it dawned on me: because I'm so damned interesting!
I'm looking forward to reading what "facts" about me the author is able to find.
Then it dawned on me: because I'm so damned interesting!
I'm looking forward to reading what "facts" about me the author is able to find.
Re: Taking down a blog
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: November 29, 2011 09:00PM
++++
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/06/2013 10:45PM by eesh.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/06/2013 10:45PM by eesh.
Re: Taking down a blog
Posted by:
^Nerd Alert
()
Date: November 29, 2011 09:01PM
Html "humor" = the last resort of penile-deficient nerds!
Or perhaps I'm just annoyed because I don't "get it" :(
Or perhaps I'm just annoyed because I don't "get it" :(
Re: Taking down a blog
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: November 29, 2011 09:02PM
Harry Tuttle Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> interrobang
HID has no clue what he is talking about. If he looks at the source code, he should be able to understand how you and I made this thread visible after the little hack by Patrick.
Blessed are the murderous.
-------------------------------------------------------
> interrobang
HID has no clue what he is talking about. If he looks at the source code, he should be able to understand how you and I made this thread visible after the little hack by Patrick.
Blessed are the murderous.
Re: Taking down a blog
Posted by:
Chances that
()
Date: November 29, 2011 09:02PM
Inkahootz created either the Billy Z or Chuck H blogs = 0.000000000000000001%
Re: Taking down a blog
Posted by:
Harry Tuttle
()
Date: November 29, 2011 09:03PM
^Nerd Alert Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Html "humor" = the last resort of penile-deficient
> nerds!
Last resort? I would think it would be a go-to...
>
> Or perhaps I'm just annoyed because I don't "get
> it" :(
Perhaps a little of both...
Signatures are for fags
-------------------------------------------------------
> Html "humor" = the last resort of penile-deficient
> nerds!
Last resort? I would think it would be a go-to...
>
> Or perhaps I'm just annoyed because I don't "get
> it" :(
Perhaps a little of both...
Signatures are for fags
Re: Taking down a blog
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: November 29, 2011 09:08PM
Chances that Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Inkahootz created either the Billy Z or Chuck H
> blogs = 0.000000000000000001%
Sorry Pat, but Chuck's gonna take your Bolivian ass to court for posting libel, and your World Bank daddy will have to bail you out. :-((
-------------------------------------------------------
> Inkahootz created either the Billy Z or Chuck H
> blogs = 0.000000000000000001%
Sorry Pat, but Chuck's gonna take your Bolivian ass to court for posting libel, and your World Bank daddy will have to bail you out. :-((
Re: Taking down a blog
Posted by:
Fact Checking is your Friend
()
Date: November 29, 2011 09:29PM
keep'em coming Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> All three of those blogs are obviously full of
> lies...I can't wait until the Nicholas Kowalczyk
> "the Xumwalts murdered my father in front of
> me...that's why I'm nuts" blog comes out.
John Kowalczyk was not murdered by James Zumwalt. John Kowalczyk was shot by Ralph N. "JR" Shambaugh, Jr., who was likely assisted by James Alting. Shambaugh was hired by Stanley Hyman, a McLean millionaire, and father of John Kowalczyk's ex-wife, Katherine.
John Kowalczyk had carried on an affair with James Zumwalt's ex-wife, Lisa, and the two were supposed to marry the summer that Kowalczyk was murdered. James Zumwalt also attempted suicide while he was under heavy suspicion for the murder of Kowalczyk.
So, the whole "the Zumwalts killed my daddy" line of thinking is ridiculous, because James Zumwalt did not kill John Kowalczyk.
For God's sake, check your facts to see if they even make sense before posting them here.
-------------------------------------------------------
> All three of those blogs are obviously full of
> lies...I can't wait until the Nicholas Kowalczyk
> "the Xumwalts murdered my father in front of
> me...that's why I'm nuts" blog comes out.
John Kowalczyk was not murdered by James Zumwalt. John Kowalczyk was shot by Ralph N. "JR" Shambaugh, Jr., who was likely assisted by James Alting. Shambaugh was hired by Stanley Hyman, a McLean millionaire, and father of John Kowalczyk's ex-wife, Katherine.
John Kowalczyk had carried on an affair with James Zumwalt's ex-wife, Lisa, and the two were supposed to marry the summer that Kowalczyk was murdered. James Zumwalt also attempted suicide while he was under heavy suspicion for the murder of Kowalczyk.
So, the whole "the Zumwalts killed my daddy" line of thinking is ridiculous, because James Zumwalt did not kill John Kowalczyk.
For God's sake, check your facts to see if they even make sense before posting them here.
Re: Taking down a blog
Posted by:
bring it on!
()
Date: November 29, 2011 09:30PM
Eesh should start a blog about everyone else he has outed on here: meeper, gravis, Gen, restonpeace, conie, and Mephisto...pictures too...I can't wait!
Re: Taking down a blog
Posted by:
eesh suicide
()
Date: November 30, 2011 04:38PM
Blue Suicide Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> How much would it cost for me to sue eesh?
LOL! Do you plan on suing yourself, eesh? smh
Attachments:
-------------------------------------------------------
> How much would it cost for me to sue eesh?
LOL! Do you plan on suing yourself, eesh? smh
Attachments:
Re: Taking down a blog
Posted by:
fairfaxdude
()
Date: November 30, 2011 05:50PM
Blue Suicide=inkahootz, the fucktard of McLean/"Miami Beach". All of you Johnny-come-latelys who don't know that can just sit this one out....LOL
Eesh, you should put up a blog post of all the skanks' pics that Inkahootz posted, claiming they were his "girlfriends". Those were priceless!
______________________________________________
I have had to change the addresses to my retaliatory blogs over half a dozen times.
Eesh, you should put up a blog post of all the skanks' pics that Inkahootz posted, claiming they were his "girlfriends". Those were priceless!
______________________________________________
I have had to change the addresses to my retaliatory blogs over half a dozen times.
Re: Taking down a blog
Posted by:
eesh suicide
()
Date: November 30, 2011 05:56PM
fairfaxdude Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Blue Suicide=inkahootz, the fucktard of
> McLean/"Miami Beach". All of you
> Johnny-come-latelys who don't know that can just
> sit this one out....LOL
>
> Eesh, you should put up a blog post of all the
> skanks' pics that Inkahootz posted, claiming they
> were his "girlfriends". Those were priceless!
You are way too predictable, eeshdude! Why don't you just go back to retired eesh alt status?
Attachments:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Blue Suicide=inkahootz, the fucktard of
> McLean/"Miami Beach". All of you
> Johnny-come-latelys who don't know that can just
> sit this one out....LOL
>
> Eesh, you should put up a blog post of all the
> skanks' pics that Inkahootz posted, claiming they
> were his "girlfriends". Those were priceless!
You are way too predictable, eeshdude! Why don't you just go back to retired eesh alt status?
Attachments:
Re: Taking down a blog
Posted by:
fairfaxdude
()
Date: November 30, 2011 06:02PM
eesh suicide Wrote:
> You are way too predictable, eeshdude! Why don't
> you just go back to retired eesh alt status?
Oh, hey there Ink-tard. How's it hangin, loser? Hey, got an idea for ya...why not just re-register as Inkahootz2 or something, so you can stop posting anonymously and all the new folks can enjoy your own very special brand of "psychotically fucked up" that you brought to FFXU back in the day...
______________________________________________
I have had to change the addresses to my retaliatory blogs over half a dozen times.
> You are way too predictable, eeshdude! Why don't
> you just go back to retired eesh alt status?
Oh, hey there Ink-tard. How's it hangin, loser? Hey, got an idea for ya...why not just re-register as Inkahootz2 or something, so you can stop posting anonymously and all the new folks can enjoy your own very special brand of "psychotically fucked up" that you brought to FFXU back in the day...
______________________________________________
I have had to change the addresses to my retaliatory blogs over half a dozen times.
Re: Taking down a blog
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: November 30, 2011 07:03PM
He's going to the magistrate! LOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
Blessed are the murderous.
Blessed are the murderous.
Re: Taking down a blog
Posted by:
Auto Bot
()
Date: December 01, 2011 05:42AM
What is all the fuss aboot?
Re: Taking down a blog
Posted by:
Gravis
()
Date: December 06, 2011 01:05AM
Blue Suicide Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If a malcontent makes a blog containing libelous
> and slanderous remarks about someone else, how can
> the victim take the blog down?
if they are using an online blog service like Blogger or Wordpress then report the user for a ToS (Terms of Service) violation. if it is not actually a blog but rather a forum like this, contact the forum moderator. this is the fastest and easiest way to resolve 99% of such instances.
"the wisdom of the wise will perish, the intelligence of the intelligent will vanish."
-------------------------------------------------------
> If a malcontent makes a blog containing libelous
> and slanderous remarks about someone else, how can
> the victim take the blog down?
if they are using an online blog service like Blogger or Wordpress then report the user for a ToS (Terms of Service) violation. if it is not actually a blog but rather a forum like this, contact the forum moderator. this is the fastest and easiest way to resolve 99% of such instances.
"the wisdom of the wise will perish, the intelligence of the intelligent will vanish."
Re: Taking down a blog
Posted by:
Bumper Cars
()
Date: August 29, 2012 01:47PM
Back to the future bumpity bump.
Oh, look who's here. lmao
Oh, look who's here. lmao
Re: Taking down a blog
Posted by:
Bumper Cars Lite V 2.0
()
Date: December 10, 2013 05:25PM
Back to the future bumpity bump.
Oh, look who's here. lmao
Oh, look who's here. lmao
Re: Taking down a blog
Posted by:
I believe Pat now
()
Date: December 10, 2013 05:34PM
I now believe about 99% of the things Pat accused eesh of. eesh is one sick ass motherfucker and should be locked away for good.
Re: Taking down a blog
Posted by:
/
()
Date: May 24, 2015 11:56PM
Blue Suicide Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> How much would it cost for me to sue eesh?
-------------------------------------------------------
> How much would it cost for me to sue eesh?