Has eesh ever had a date? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> It is obvious that you have never attended a Tea
> Party rally and are buying the liberal talking
> points, so further discourse will not be
> productive.



And of course you have attended rallies, right? What would be the point of attending a Tea Party rally, I think they are a bunch of backwards people that want to take America back to 1950.


> Tea Party members don't care what the MSM says
> about them. Tea Party members don't care what
> left-wing sheeple like eesh, WTL and TheMeeper say
> about them. The Tea Party is here to stay. Get
> used to it. The numbers are against liberal
> theology in this country and the Tea Party makes
> you fools on the left have to face that. Scary
> for you indeed.




OOOOOOOOOH You're so daring, so brave to stand up against the mainstream. I guess you're such a free thinker huh? You might want to look for a new prophet other than the bimbo from Alaska.

ITRADE Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> As opposed to Daily Kos who repeatedly target
> congressmen and congresswomen - including
> Giffords?



Last time I checked, Daily KOS wasn't a nationally-known political or media figure. Probably 9 out of 10 people wouldn't know what the heck that even is. Also, one those graphics is from Palin's website, they must have been re-posting it.

"Since its creation Daily Kos has grown to become the largest progressive community blog in the United States, with over 215,000 registered users and 2.5 million unique viewers per month as of August 2009. The blog's popularity has attracted the attention of many Democratic senators, congressmen, governors and candidates who have posted on the site, including Senators John Kerry, and Barbara Boxer, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, {former} Speaker of the United States House of Representatives Nancy Pelosi, former President Jimmy Carter, and President Barack Obama."



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/10/2011 01:27PM by ITRADE.

TheMeeper Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ITRADE Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > As opposed to Daily Kos who repeatedly target
> > congressmen and congresswomen - including
> > Giffords?
>
>
>
> Last time I checked, Daily KOS wasn't a
> nationally-known political or media figure.
> Probably 9 out of 10 people wouldn't know what the
> heck that even is. Also, one those graphics is
> from Palin's website, they must have been
> re-posting it.

Check again. They have elected members of Congress as regular contributers (icluding Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi). However, they continued to contribute even after the bulls eye graphics went up.

215,000 users is less than 1/10th of a percent of the US population. I don't consider that to be a major media outlet.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/10/2011 01:34PM by TheMeeper.

It only takes one to take a shot. And one did.

TheMeeper Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> 215,000 users is less than 1/10th of a percent of
> the US population. I don't consider that to be a
> major media outlet.

And Sarah Palin is a national media outlet?

Debates on here really aren't a waste of time at all.

kos Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> And Sarah Palin is a national media outlet?

She's only a Fox News contributor/ex-Vice Presidential Candidate/best-selling writer/reality TV star. Nope, I'm sure this KOS website is far more influential than her.

--------------------------------------------------------------
13 4826 0948 82695 25847. Yes.

The Meeper = Lefty Poophead

MrMephisto Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> kos Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > And Sarah Palin is a national media outlet?
>
> She's only a Fox News contributor/ex-Vice
> Presidential Candidate/best-selling writer/reality
> TV star. Nope, I'm sure this KOS website is far
> more influential than her.


Yes, it has no influence whatsover. That is why the speaker of the house, the majority leader in the Senate, numerous committee chairmain, oh and yeah, the CURRENT FUCKING PRESIDENT all contributed to the site.

DailyKOS is a small blog and it's not at all known for a systematic barrage of violent, gun-related comments against the US government.

Well, the MSM has been making hay of a "target list" that supposedly included Rep. Giffords as a "target". Interestingly, a well-known, well-supported leftist website (aka DailyKos) also had a "target list" which included Rep. Giffords as a target.

Seems far fetched to accept one list as proof beyond reasonable doubt but to claim total and complete ignorance of the other list.

TheMeeper Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> DailyKOS is a small blog and it's not at all known
> for a systematic barrage of violent, gun-related
> comments against the US government.

Keep telling yourself that. Maybe you might even believe it one day. The "small blog" raised over $1.4 Million dollars for Democrats in the 2006 election cycle alone.

TheMeeper Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Palin removed the bullseye graphic from her
> website after the shooting. Why do that?
> Because she knows she's wrong, but won't admit it.

Hmm, let's hear what you think of this then. We have what you call a non-mainstream media source being used by violent left-wing radicals, reading this stuff and shooting who they are opposed to, yet you blame Sarah Palin. Hypocrite much?

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=249273

well if they print an apology (which they should), please let me know because I certainly wouldn't find out about it otherwise

ITRADE Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Well, the MSM has been making hay of a "target
> list" that supposedly included Rep. Giffords as a
> "target". Interestingly, a well-known,
> well-supported leftist website (aka DailyKos) also
> had a "target list" which included Rep. Giffords
> as a target.
> p
> Seems far fetched to accept one list as proof
> beyond reasonable doubt but to claim total and
> complete ignorance of the other list.

MrMephisto Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ShastaGreen Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > It's wrong and
> > stupid and you're engaging in the same type of
> > shit you deplore.
>
> I'm not claiming to know what this guy's political
> affiliation was. Nor am I claiming he was a
> member of the Tea Party.
>
> What I'm saying is, there's a group of American
> citizens who, intentionally or not, are
> encouraging violence against politicians they
> disagree with. The very public face of this group
> of American citizens literally put a target on
> this congresswoman. Whack jobs like the shooter
> tend to pick and choose what they believe based on
> what fits into their own narrative. This isn't
> like someone thinking "Catcher in the Rye" says
> they should kill the president; these are people
> saying that guns are necessary to make the country
> better, and all people like the shooter need is a
> target.

"Intentionally or not"? What does that mean? Everytime some wackjob kills for some wackjob reason we should blame those whom that indvidual happens to say justified their delusional antics? Perhaps we should ban The Beatles White Album for being the source of inspiration for the Manson killings. You're just bashing the Tea Party and assigning blame where none can be found at this time. Based on everything I've heard, the guy had no coherent political philohpsy. See the WaPo's editorial today about this guy.

THE DAILY KOS EVEN HAS A "O" AROUND A PERSONS HEAD FOR THEIR
LOGO IF YOU LOOK UP @ ITRADES POST ABOVE.

THE EVIL DAILY KOS IS GUILTY AS AN ACCCESSORY TO THIS WOMANS MURDER !

hmmm Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Hmm, let's hear what you think of this then.

Umm, it's an anonymous person posting on a blog and it's not even a violent gun-reference.

The diaries are written by users not the site owners and the list I saw from Kos was missing the actual bullseye target graphic. It was a list of names with some bolded.

Edit: also that's a "partial screenshot" from WND of all places I'd like to see more.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/10/2011 02:07PM by Johnny Walker.

IT'S A CONSPIRACY OF IDEOLOGIES !
A WAR ON THE SUBLIMINAL LEVEL.
MIND CONTROL I TELL YOU !

TheMeeper Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> 215,000 users is less than 1/10th of a percent of
> the US population. I don't consider that to be a
> major media outlet.

So you saying it is a fringe element of the left thinking population?

Boehner supports violence:

ShastaGreen Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Perhaps we should ban The Beatles White Album for
> being the source of inspiration for the Manson
> killings.

MrMephisto Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> This isn't like someone thinking "Catcher in the Rye" says
> they should kill the president; these are people
> saying that guns are necessary to make the country
> better, and all people like the shooter need is a
> target.

Nowhere in "Catcher in the Rye" did it say anything that could have been misconstrued as "shoot John Lennon" or "kill President Reagan to impress Jodi Foster." The lyrics on the White album didn't say anything about murder or starting a race war.

Palin DID, however, put forth a map depicting a crosshairs on this politician.

--------------------------------------------------------------
13 4826 0948 82695 25847. Yes.

MrMephisto Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ShastaGreen Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Perhaps we should ban The Beatles White Album
> for
> > being the source of inspiration for the Manson
> > killings.
>
> MrMephisto Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > This isn't like someone thinking "Catcher in the
> Rye" says
> > they should kill the president; these are
> people
> > saying that guns are necessary to make the
> country
> > better, and all people like the shooter need is
> a
> > target.
>
> Nowhere in "Catcher in the Rye" did it say
> anything that could have been misconstrued as
> "shoot John Lennon" or "kill President Reagan to
> impress Jodi Foster." The lyrics on the White
> album didn't say anything about murder or starting
> a race war.
>
> Palin DID, however, put forth a map depicting a
> crosshairs on this politician.


So did Daily Kos. So what.

cuda Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> TheMeeper Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > 215,000 users is less than 1/10th of a percent
> of
> > the US population. I don't consider that to be
> a
> > major media outlet.
>
> So you saying it is a fringe element of the left
> thinking population?

Do you understand words in English?

TheMeeper Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> cuda Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > TheMeeper Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > 215,000 users is less than 1/10th of a
> percent
> > of
> > > the US population. I don't consider that to
> be
> > a
> > > major media outlet.
> >
> > So you saying it is a fringe element of the
> left
> > thinking population?
>
> Do you understand words in English?

Oh, see after reading all your posts, I thought this was the let's make the most tenuous and asinine arguments in supoort of an idiotic premise thread. Sorry for the confusion. Keep making shit up and pulling flimsy arguments from your ass.

cuda Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> TheMeeper Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > 215,000 users is less than 1/10th of a percent
> of
> > the US population. I don't consider that to be
> a
> > major media outlet.
>
> So you saying it is a fringe element of the left
> thinking population?

Evidently DailyKOS is well represented amongst the libs on this board. I am sure they are over 10% here - and that doesn't count for all the blogs tied in to DailyKOS and HuffPo that get their marching orders every day.

Either way, the Dems are acting like this is their opportunity to exploit a tragedy to pass all sorts of shit.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0111/47338.html
...Pennsylvania Rep. Robert Brady, a Democrat from Philadelphia, told CNN that he also plans to take legislative action. He will introduce a bill that would make it a crime for anyone to use language or symbols that could be seen as threatening or violent against a federal official, including a member of Congress...

What, there aren't already laws on the books against being threatened? Oh, now we have to try and outlaw symbols used in political speak - clearly this is aimed at Palin's site. Maybe they should pass a law too while they are at it that politicians are committing a felony when they knowingly lie on an issue not tied to national security - I mean they do take an oath of office, shouldn't they be held to a higher standard?

This is like watching global warming all over again. Every time there was a hurricane, flood or other natural disaster, it was automatically something to do with global warming.

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University

Registered Voter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Either way, the Dems are acting like this is their
> opportunity to exploit a tragedy to pass all sorts
> of shit.
>
> http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0111/47338.ht
> ml
> ...Pennsylvania Rep. Robert Brady, a Democrat from
> Philadelphia, told CNN that he also plans to take
> legislative action. He will introduce a bill that
> would make it a crime for anyone to use language
> or symbols that could be seen as threatening or
> violent against a federal official, including a
> member of Congress...


This is not a surprise, but not because it's a Democrat, just cause. Also, it's stupid.

MrMephisto Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ShastaGreen Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Perhaps we should ban The Beatles White Album
> for
> > being the source of inspiration for the Manson
> > killings.
>
> MrMephisto Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > This isn't like someone thinking "Catcher in the
> Rye" says
> > they should kill the president; these are
> people
> > saying that guns are necessary to make the
> country
> > better, and all people like the shooter need is
> a
> > target.
>
> Nowhere in "Catcher in the Rye" did it say
> anything that could have been misconstrued as
> "shoot John Lennon" or "kill President Reagan to
> impress Jodi Foster." The lyrics on the White
> album didn't say anything about murder or starting
> a race war.

You clearly haven't listend to "Piggies." It's about giving the "pigs" a "damn good whacking."

> Palin DID, however, put forth a map depicting a
> crosshairs on this politician.


The President also encouraged his supporters in a rally to "bring guns to a knife fight" (paraphrasing) in order to beat the Republicans in the 2010 Midterms. Should he also be blamed for inciting violent political expressions? It's clear you're just reaching and looking to point the finger to justify your own barely lucid thoughts on politics (i.e., engaging in the same stuff you ostensibly deplore).

This is from the WaPo, a reliably liberal newpaper today. You should take it to heart:

"Politicians should choose their words with care and keep debate civil, but it seems an unsupported leap to blame either the political climate or any particular individual or group for inciting the gunman. The suspect appears to be a disturbed young man with no coherent political philosophy."

The FBI should be monitoring WashingTone-Locian and TheMeeper. Their ramblings would indicate a break with reality.

eesh might be added to the list if he doesn't snap out of it.

"I'd just like to say that when you look at unbalanced people, how they are - how they respond to the vitriol that comes out of certain mouths, about tearing down the government, the anger, the hatred, the bigotry that goes on in this country is getting to be outrageous," Pima County Sheriff Clarence W. Dupnik said in a nationally televised news conference. "

Alias Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The FBI should be monitoring WashingTone-Locian
> and TheMeeper. Their ramblings would indicate a
> break with reality.
>
> eesh might be added to the list if he doesn't snap
> out of it.


Wow, that's stupid, not to mention a worthless straw-man argument.

Whats interesting to me in this "debate", is that not one of the right-tards on here (Reggie the Dumbfuck...et al) have even acknowledged that a "national leader" might exercise better judgment than putting figurative crosshairs on political opponents...that it MIGHT not be the best idea she ever had.

And a huge LOL at the staffer who tried to pass it off as "surveyor's markings"....that was too fucking hilarious for words. Loved the timing of the retraction too....LOL

Irregardless of this Loughner idiot's kookiness, or any efforts to paint his motivations as coming from one political perspective or the other ( NONE of us KNOW, but that won't stop millions from speculating...including the retards and Dumb fucks on this site) I would hope the "crosshairs" era of hateful politics might finally get tamped down a bit. Agree?

______________________________________________
I have had to change the addresses to my retaliatory blogs over half a dozen times.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/10/2011 03:17PM by fairfaxdude.

Actually the "cross hairs" look more like airport denotations that you find on FAA section charts.

ITRADE Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Actually the "cross hairs" look more like airport
> denotations that you find on FAA section charts.


I guess the staffer didn't think of that excuse in time, huh? LOL

" Those aren't crosshairs...I have it on good authority they are SURVEYORS MARKS...hold on..just a sec...NO, they're actually AIRPORT MAP SYMBOLs....yeah, thats it...print that! And, btw, let everyone know they arent on the site anymore, OK"

Ummm....WTF?

______________________________________________
I have had to change the addresses to my retaliatory blogs over half a dozen times.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/10/2011 03:28PM by fairfaxdude.

Alias Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The FBI should be monitoring WashingTone-Locian
> and TheMeeper. Their ramblings would indicate a
> break with reality.
>
> eesh might be added to the list if he doesn't snap
> out of it.



Judging from the venom you used to spit out when you first came to this site under your current name and "Birdlover", you make it painfully obvious you don't like having a black man in the Oval Office. I would think the FBI should be concerned with right wing racists like yourself.

BOOM HEADSHOT....there someone said it.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/10/2011 03:57PM by BrandonVA.

fairfaxdude Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Alias Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > The FBI should be monitoring WashingTone-Locian
> > and TheMeeper. Their ramblings would indicate
> a
> > break with reality.
> >
> > eesh might be added to the list if he doesn't
> snap
> > out of it.
>
>
> Wow, that's stupid, not to mention a worthless
> straw-man argument.
>
> Whats interesting to me in this "debate", is that
> not one of the right-tards on here (Reggie the
> Dumbfuck...et al) have even acknowledged that a
> "national leader" might exercise better judgment
> than putting figurative crosshairs on political
> opponents...that it MIGHT not be the best idea she
> ever had.
>
> And a huge LOL at the staffer who tried to pass it
> off as "surveyor's markings"....that was too
> fucking hilarious for words. Loved the timing of
> the retraction too....LOL
>
> Irregardless of this Loughner idiot's kookiness,
> or any efforts to paint his motivations as coming
> from one political perspective or the other ( NONE
> of us KNOW, but that won't stop millions from
> speculating...including the retards and Dumb fucks
> on this site) I would hope the "crosshairs" era of
> hateful politics might finally get tamped down a
> bit. Agree?



You are arguing with Alias, a housewife that sits at home all day watching Fox News when she isn't feeding the neighborhood cats. Do not interact with her.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/10/2011 03:57PM by eesh.

When was the last time you got any, eesh?

ITRADE Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> When was the last time you got any, eesh?




I get about as much as your fat sloppy wife gives you. Don't you have some airline reservations to make for your bosses at the firm? It must hurt to be the bitch boy paralegal at your office.

LIBERAL WORMFOOD.

Hey man have some respect her family could find this thread and then they'll be really upset.

fairfaxdude Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Whats interesting to me in this "debate", is that
> not one of the right-tards on here (Reggie the
> Dumbfuck...et al) have even acknowledged that a
> "national leader" might exercise better judgment
> than putting figurative crosshairs on political
> opponents...that it MIGHT not be the best idea she
> ever had.

Hey Fairy-tard. The reason none of us are talking about what YOU think is relevant - is that Sarah Palin is not relevant to the whole issue. Do you really believe this guy ever looked at her website to see the crosshairs? That is why it isn't relevant - politicians have been using these figures of speech and symbols for longer than when Sarah Palin showed up on the scene. Even the Whitehouse today scrubbed some of their information to get rid of the word 'shellacking' so that they wouldn't look like hypocrites in the use of 'violent' rhetoric.

None of US needs to acknowledge anything at what you care to have us acknowledge - because most of US here don't consider Palin all that relevant other than as a fund raiser. It is only the libtards on here that have this avid fascination with everything Palin, and now it is clear why - it seems that is all the left-leaning websites want to talk about as well (even prior to this incident).

>
> Irregardless of this Loughner idiot's kookiness,
> or any efforts to paint his motivations as coming
> from one political perspective or the other ( NONE
> of us KNOW, but that won't stop millions from
> speculating...including the retards and Dumb fucks
> on this site) I would hope the "crosshairs" era of
> hateful politics might finally get tamped down a
> bit. Agree?

Sure, both sides need to stick to the issues and leave the baiting, and abusive rhetoric out of the picture - whether it is calling people nazis, or whatever. You want to say someone is socialist or conservative, liberal or religious whatever. But it has to start from our political leaders on both sides.

> Wow, that's stupid, not to mention a worthless
> straw-man argument.
>

So is this whole exercise of trying to stick the blame for what one sick, deluded man with a gun did on to a variety of social issues and movements. How about they just stick to reporting the story, and not wild speculation on whatever fantasies they have about how this guy ticks.

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University

"Shellacking" isn't violent rhetoric though.

fairfaxdude Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Alias Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > The FBI should be monitoring WashingTone-Locian
> > and TheMeeper. Their ramblings would indicate
> a
> > break with reality.
> >
> > eesh might be added to the list if he doesn't
> snap
> > out of it.
>
>
> Wow, that's stupid, not to mention a worthless
> straw-man argument.
>
> Whats interesting to me in this "debate", is that
> not one of the right-tards on here (Reggie the
> Dumbfuck...et al) have even acknowledged that a
> "national leader" might exercise better judgment
> than putting figurative crosshairs on political
> opponents...that it MIGHT not be the best idea she
> ever had.
>
> And a huge LOL at the staffer who tried to pass it
> off as "surveyor's markings"....that was too
> fucking hilarious for words. Loved the timing of
> the retraction too....LOL
>
> Irregardless of this Loughner idiot's kookiness...


'Irregardless' is not a word, retard!

All I know is that after watching ITRADE's signature, I feel like shooting Ronald McDonald.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ITRADE Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > When was the last time you got any, eesh?
>
>
>
>
> I get about as much as your fat sloppy wife gives
> you.

She's about 120 pounds, and I doubt that you're getting any.

> Don't you have some airline reservations to
> make for your bosses at the firm? It must hurt to
> be the bitch boy paralegal at your office.

No, we have secretaries to do that. Paralegal, yes, about 12 years ago. Today, not so much.

But please continue to be bitter.

eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ITRADE Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > When was the last time you got any, eesh?
>
>
>
>
> I get about as much as your fat sloppy wife gives
> you. Don't you have some airline reservations to
> make for your bosses at the firm? It must hurt to
> be the bitch boy paralegal at your office.


Sad eesh. You're sounding more and more like a loony, bitter hermit with a small johnson who's only connection with other humans is on the Interweb. Sad, sad LITTLE man.

eesh is loosing it (not his virginity) Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Sad eesh. You're sounding more and more like a
> loony, bitter hermit with a small johnson who's
> only connection with other humans is on the
> Interweb. Sad, sad LITTLE man.



I'm glad to see you are fantasizing about the size of my peter.

Registered Voter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Hey Fairy-tard. The reason none of us are talking
> about what YOU think is relevant - is that Sarah
> Palin is not relevant to the whole issue. Do you
> really believe this guy ever looked at her website
> to see the crosshairs? That is why it isn't
> relevant - politicians have been using these
> figures of speech and symbols for longer than when
> Sarah Palin showed up on the scene. Even the
> Whitehouse today scrubbed some of their
> information to get rid of the word 'shellacking'
> so that they wouldn't look like hypocrites in the
> use of 'violent' rhetoric.




Hmmmmm....shellacking, crosshairs on a map, shellacking, crosshairs on a map. What exactly about the word shellacking conjures up images of violence?

EVERYBODY RUN, HE'S GOT SHELLAC!!!!
Attachments:

Fairy Gay Mother Wrote:

>
> 'Irregardless' is not a word, retard!


Irregardless of your stupidity, you might want to check your Miriam Webster...retard...LOL

______________________________________________
I have had to change the addresses to my retaliatory blogs over half a dozen times.

eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hmmmmm....shellacking, crosshairs on a map,
> shellacking, crosshairs on a map. What exactly
> about the word shellacking conjures up images of
> violence?

You would have to ask them. The crosshairs on a map was so successful the Dems copied it and used it on their own websites (see ITRADE's listing above).

But, those lefties, they are such paragons of virtue, they would never post anything that bad right?

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/comments_blog/2008/10/palin-effigy-a.html


The left just tend to act on their violent urges - with guns in their hands.



http://jezebel.com/5045934/why-sarah-palin-incites-near+violent-rage-in-normally-reasonable-women

http://michellemalkin.com/2008/06/04/assassination-fascination/
If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University

Registered Voter Wrote:

The reason none of us are talking
> about what YOU think is relevant - is that Sarah
> Palin is not relevant to the whole issue. Do you
> really believe this guy ever looked at her website
> to see the crosshairs?

Whether he did or didn't...YOU don't know either. Using it as the basis for further argument is stupid, as you attempt to do below.

That is why it isn't
> relevant - politicians have been using these
> figures of speech and symbols for longer than when
> Sarah Palin showed up on the scene. Even the
> Whitehouse today scrubbed some of their
> information to get rid of the word 'shellacking'
> so that they wouldn't look like hypocrites in the
> use of 'violent' rhetoric.

Boy, I sure hope they remove any reference to "erasing", "overcoming", and the like, too...man, that "shellacking" word sure is incendiary. Holy God, I can't believe even you, Reggie-tard, would stoop this low or be this stupit. Big LOL.
>
> None of US needs to acknowledge anything at what
> you care to have us acknowledge - because most of
> US here don't consider Palin all that relevant
> other than as a fund raiser. It is only the
> libtards on here that have this avid fascination
> with everything Palin, and now it is clear why -
> it seems that is all the left-leaning websites
> want to talk about as well (even prior to this
> incident).

I didn't say you "needed" to acknowledge anything, dip-stick...merely observed that you and your synchophants went to great pains NOT TO acknowledge the lack of judgment of the crosshairs, which of course you will continue to do...since she isn't "relevant". That's a big LOL too.

______________________________________________
I have had to change the addresses to my retaliatory blogs over half a dozen times.

fairfaxdude Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Fairy Gay Mother Wrote:
>
> >
> > 'Irregardless' is not a word, retard!
>
>
> Irregardless of your stupidity, you might want to
> check your Miriam Webster...retard...LOL


Here's a word for you, retard: NONSTANDARD = not a 'real' word; unfortunately, idiots like you made it somewhat acceptable in spoken word even though it's grammatically incorrect and not considered proper English.


FYI:

—Usage note
Irregardless is considered nonstandard because of the two negative elements ir- and -less.


irregardless an erroneous word that, etymologically, means the exact opposite of what it is used to express.



'LOL' times a googol, loser!

There's a difference between random liberal nobodies doing and saying stupid shit and the leaders of the freaking party doing it.

RV

Kucinich catered to these radicals by calling for a Department of Peace.

Palin catered to the nutjobs in the Tea Party by recommending they take out members of Congress they disagreed with.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

Registered Voter Wrote:

> You would have to ask them. The crosshairs on a
> map was so successful the Dems copied it and used
> it on their own websites (see ITRADE's listing
> above).
>
> But, those lefties, they are such paragons of
> virtue, they would never post anything that bad
> right?
>
> http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/comments_blog/2008
> /10/palin-effigy-a.html

> The left just tend to act on their violent urges -
> with guns in their hands.

> http://jezebel.com/5045934/why-sarah-palin-incites
> -near+violent-rage-in-normally-reasonable-women
>
> http://michellemalkin.com/2008/06/04/assassination
> -fascination/


Another classic REGGIE-RETARD ad hominem tu quoque retort X 4.

So boring, so pedestrian, yet we've learned to never expect much else from him.

Ho HUM. YAWWWWWWWWN.

______________________________________________
I have had to change the addresses to my retaliatory blogs over half a dozen times.

fairfaxdude Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Fairy Gay Mother Wrote:
>
> >
> > 'Irregardless' is not a word, retard!
>
>
> Irregardless of your stupidity, you might want to
> check your Miriam Webster...retard...LOL

Might want to look again dipshit.
http://grammar.quickanddirtytips.com/irregardless.aspx
...Standard Versus Nonstandard English
Now, on to dictionaries. Although it's true that the American Heritage Dictionary, the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, and the Oxford English Dictionary all list the word irregardless, they also note that it's considered nonstandard. Listing a word as nonstandard is a way that dictionaries concede that a word is in common use, but isn't really a proper word. Standard language is defined as the language spoken by educated native speakers (1), but comprehensive dictionaries also include nonstandard words, dialect, colloquialisms, and jargon--words like ain't, conversate, and irregardless. It seems pretty common for people to look up a word in a dictionary, and if it's there, they think it's fine to use that word every circumstance. It's the "Look, it's a word!" phenomenon. But you have to look a little further to see what kind of word it is, and if it's nonstandard in some way, then use it with caution. You'll sound uneducated if you go around saying things like I ain't gonna conversate with him irregardless of the consequences...

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University

People like Sarah Palin and her followers are what will get the 2nd Amendment taken away from normal people.

Johnny Walker Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> There's a difference between random liberal
> nobodies doing and saying stupid shit and the
> leaders of the freaking party doing it.

As many posters here like to point out, the Tea Party is not an official party. Right? Or did that change after they got so many folks elected on the Republican ticket.

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University

The Tea Party is the Republican party.

Registered Voter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> fairfaxdude Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Fairy Gay Mother Wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > 'Irregardless' is not a word, retard!
> >
> >
> > Irregardless of your stupidity, you might want
> to
> > check your Miriam Webster...retard...LOL
>
> Might want to look again dipshit.
> http://grammar.quickanddirtytips.com/irregardless.
> aspx
> ...Standard Versus Nonstandard English
> Now, on to dictionaries. Although it's true that
> the American Heritage Dictionary, the
> Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, and the Oxford
> English Dictionary all list the word irregardless,
> they also note that it's considered nonstandard.
> Listing a word as nonstandard is a way that
> dictionaries concede that a word is in common use,
> but isn't really a proper word. Standard language
> is defined as the language spoken by educated
> native speakers (1), but comprehensive
> dictionaries also include nonstandard words,
> dialect, colloquialisms, and jargon--words like
> ain't, conversate, and irregardless. It seems
> pretty common for people to look up a word in a
> dictionary, and if it's there, they think it's
> fine to use that word every circumstance. It's the
> "Look, it's a word!" phenomenon. But you have to
> look a little further to see what kind of word it
> is, and if it's nonstandard in some way, then use
> it with caution. You'll sound uneducated if you go
> around saying things like I ain't gonna conversate
> with him irregardless of the consequences...


RV, when confronted with an opposing and more correct argument, resorts to attacking posters' grammar and spelling. Wow.

fairfaxdude Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Another classic REGGIE-RETARD ad hominem tu quoque
> retort X 4.
>
> So boring, so pedestrian, yet we've learned to
> never expect much else from him.
>
> Ho HUM. YAWWWWWWWWN.

You really are a retard. It's amazing just how stupid you are when you post - absolutely nothing of value. Again, life caught you without an original thought. Go figure.

All hail Fairy, official retard of FFXU.

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University

Typical MSM bullshit:

Journalists urged caution after Ft. Hood, now race to blame Palin after Arizona shootings

http://washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/2011/01/journalists-urged-caution-after-ft-hood-now-race-blame-palin-afte

fairfaxdude Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Another classic REGGIE-RETARD ad hominem tu quoque
> retort X 4.

Says the fairie who posts 90% of the time to personally attack another poster. You might want to look up the term hyocrite.

eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> RV, when confronted with an opposing and more
> correct argument, resorts to attacking posters'
> grammar and spelling. Wow.

eesh, when seeing his butt buddy Fairy getting beat up, comes to the rescue with... nothing.

Hey eesh - why don't you go troll someplace besides your basement? Or would that get you too far away from Fairy? Too funny - you are like 'retard', and 'retarder'

(yeah, it isn't a word - but it fits the situation)

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/10/2011 05:38PM by Registered Voter.

Last I saw, Palin was a REPUBLICAN, and one of but a few front-runners for the Republican Presidential nomination in 2012.

ANOTHER straw man argument, REG-TARD? Having a tough day, huh?

and a big LOL on googling grammar...I can make you do just about anything, huh, REG-TARD?

______________________________________________
I have had to change the addresses to my retaliatory blogs over half a dozen times.

Registered Voter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> fairfaxdude Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Fairy Gay Mother Wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > 'Irregardless' is not a word, retard!
> >
> >
> > Irregardless of your stupidity, you might want
> to
> > check your Miriam Webster...retard...LOL
>
> Might want to look again dipshit.
> http://grammar.quickanddirtytips.com/irregardless.
> aspx
> ...Standard Versus Nonstandard English
> Now, on to dictionaries. Although it's true that
> the American Heritage Dictionary, the
> Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, and the Oxford
> English Dictionary all list the word irregardless,
> they also note that it's considered nonstandard.
> Listing a word as nonstandard is a way that
> dictionaries concede that a word is in common use,
> but isn't really a proper word. Standard language
> is defined as the language spoken by educated
> native speakers (1), but comprehensive
> dictionaries also include nonstandard words,
> dialect, colloquialisms, and jargon--words like
> ain't, conversate, and irregardless. It seems
> pretty common for people to look up a word in a
> dictionary, and if it's there, they think it's
> fine to use that word every circumstance. It's the
> "Look, it's a word!" phenomenon. But you have to
> look a little further to see what kind of word it
> is, and if it's nonstandard in some way, then use
> it with caution. You'll sound uneducated if you go
> around saying things like I ain't gonna conversate
> with him irregardless of the consequences...



Fairy is TOO stupid to realize what I mentioned before: irregardless is an erroneous word that, etymologically, means the exact opposite of what it is used to express.

Registered Voter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> eesh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > RV, when confronted with an opposing and more
> > correct argument, resorts to attacking posters'
> > grammar and spelling. Wow.
>
> eesh, when seeing his butt buddy Fairy getting
> beat up, come to the rescue with... nothing.
>
> Hey eesh - why don't you go troll someplace
> besides your basement?


RV, when seeing his rightard butt buddy Alias and mcsmack getting beat up, comes to the rescue with...nothing.

Hey RV, why don't you go troll someplace besides that "server room" that you have described as your place of employment.

Registered Voter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> eesh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > RV, when confronted with an opposing and more
> > correct argument, resorts to attacking posters'
> > grammar and spelling. Wow.
>
> eesh, when seeing his butt buddy Fairy getting
> beat up, come to the rescue with... nothing.
>
> Hey eesh - why don't you go troll someplace
> besides your basement?


You forgot eesh is [a] fairy!


+1, good buddy! :)

Registered Voter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> fairfaxdude Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Another classic REGGIE-RETARD ad hominem tu
> quoque
> > retort X 4.
> >
> > So boring, so pedestrian, yet we've learned to
> > never expect much else from him.
> >
> > Ho HUM. YAWWWWWWWWN.
>
> You really are a retard. It's amazing just how
> stupid you are when you post - absolutely nothing
> of value. Again, life caught you without an
> original thought. Go figure.
>
> All hail Fairy, official retard of FFXU.

let me dumb it down so you can understand, REG-TARD. When you are completely and uttterly destroyed in a FFXU debate (which is most of the time) you simply put your little girl panties on and respond with "I know you but what am I"...exactly as you did above.

Your silent defense of Palin and her ilk is deafening. And full of LOLs.

______________________________________________
I have had to change the addresses to my retaliatory blogs over half a dozen times.

kettler Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> fairfaxdude Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > Another classic REGGIE-RETARD ad hominem tu
> quoque
> > retort X 4.
>
> Says the fairie who posts 90% of the time to
> personally attack another poster. You might want
> to look up the term hyocrite.



I smell a deadbeat dad, 3x drunk driver in this thread.

fairfaxdude Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> > All hail Fairy, official retard of FFXU.
>
> let me dumb it down so you can understand,
> REG-TARD. When you are completely and uttterly
> destroyed in a FFXU debate (which is most of the
> time) you simply put your little girl panties on
> and respond with "I know you but what am
> I"...exactly as you did above.
>
> Your silent defense of Palin and her ilk is
> deafening. And full of LOLs.

And again - who cares? You can think it is relevant all you want. Last time I checked, your opinion was about as meaningful as a thimbleful of piss.

And hey, I can get you to come out and post whenever - because you just have to 'Fairy On' and attack when you see me post. Who has whom, doing what again?

Fucking lol.

And as usual, watch the 'thread derailers' come in when they have nothing but BS to peddle.

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University

eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> I smell a deadbeat dad, 3x drunk driver in this
> thread.


HAHAHHA...his Tapout is tapped out.

FIST or be fisted= his motto.

______________________________________________
I have had to change the addresses to my retaliatory blogs over half a dozen times.

eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Registered Voter Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > eesh Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > RV, when confronted with an opposing and more
> > > correct argument, resorts to attacking
> posters'
> > > grammar and spelling. Wow.
> >
> > eesh, when seeing his butt buddy Fairy getting
> > beat up, come to the rescue with... nothing.
> >
> > Hey eesh - why don't you go troll someplace
> > besides your basement?
>
>
> RV, when seeing his rightard butt buddy Alias and
> mcsmack getting beat up, comes to the rescue
> with...nothing.
>
> Hey RV, why don't you go troll someplace besides
> that "server room" that you have described as your
> place of employment.

eesh, I sense a definite 'stalker' mentality here. What do you do, collect various information people post about themselves so you can work up a case to out them or something? It is amazing how many times you pull up some comment that was made months, or even years ago that might be pertinent to personal details of people here.

Really, get a life dude, you are sick.

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University

Registered Voter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> fairfaxdude Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > > All hail Fairy, official retard of FFXU.
> >
> > let me dumb it down so you can understand,
> > REG-TARD. When you are completely and uttterly
> > destroyed in a FFXU debate (which is most of
> the
> > time) you simply put your little girl panties
> on
> > and respond with "I know you but what am
> > I"...exactly as you did above.
> >
> > Your silent defense of Palin and her ilk is
> > deafening. And full of LOLs.
>
> And again - who cares? You can think it is
> relevant all you want. Last time I checked, your
> opinion was about as meaningful as a thimbleful of
> piss.
>
> And hey, I can get you to come out and post
> whenever - because you just have to 'Fairy On' and
> attack when you see me post. Who has whom, doing
> what again?
>
> Fucking lol.
>
> And as usual, watch the 'thread derailers' come in
> when they have nothing but BS to peddle.




Typical RV tactics. Anytime the other right wingers join in like Alias, Wingnut and mcsmack RV doesn't complain, yet when an opposing point of view is presented, RV devalues it.

Registered Voter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> fairfaxdude Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> > let me dumb it down so you can understand,
> > REG-TARD. When you are completely and uttterly
> > destroyed in a FFXU debate (which is most of
> the
> > time) you simply put your little girl panties
> on
> > and respond with "I know you but what am
> > I"...exactly as you did above.
> >
> > Your silent defense of Palin and her ilk is
> > deafening. And full of LOLs.
>
> And again - who cares? You can think it is
> relevant all you want. Last time I checked, your
> opinion was about as meaningful as a thimbleful of
> piss.

If you read my post--which you clearly won't because it doesn't support your ridiculous attempts at ad hominem attacks and straw man arguments---per usual;
you'll find I decidedly said it WASN'T relevant, merely a curious observation that you (and your ilk) are going to great lengths to avoid saying Palin exercised very poor judgment...nothing more, nothing less.

Too bad the whole thread DOES exist for people who CAN read, huh, REG-TARD?

______________________________________________
I have had to change the addresses to my retaliatory blogs over half a dozen times.

Registered Voter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> >
> > Hey RV, why don't you go troll someplace
> besides
> > that "server room" that you have described as
> your
> > place of employment.
>
> eesh, I sense a definite 'stalker' mentality here.
> What do you do, collect various information people
> post about themselves so you can work up a case to
> out them or something? It is amazing how many
> times you pull up some comment that was made
> months, or even years ago that might be pertinent
> to personal details of people here.
>
> Really, get a life dude, you are sick.


Yet you didn't complain when Vince(1)'s Facebook and real name were put on this site, did you? As long as someone you dislike is getting the personal attack, it's all kosher, right RV?

fairfaxdude Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> eesh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > I smell a deadbeat dad, 3x drunk driver in this
> > thread.
>
>
> HAHAHHA...his Tapout is tapped out.
>
> FIST or be fisted= his motto.


Eesh, unable to realize how much of a true asshole he is (and convinced that everyone here adores and fawns over him, instead of despising him like they truly do), resorts to blaming an old mythological nemesis and then has his alt ego, fairy, come co sign!


What a sad little [gay] boy! :(


Don't worry, eesh...
Attachments:

fairfaxdude Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Registered Voter Wrote:
>
> The reason none of us are talking
> > about what YOU think is relevant - is that
> Sarah
> > Palin is not relevant to the whole issue. Do
> you
> > really believe this guy ever looked at her
> website
> > to see the crosshairs?
>
> Whether he did or didn't...YOU don't know either.
> Using it as the basis for further argument is
> stupid, as you attempt to do below.

erm...what?

So, you are saying you don't know - so again, why is Palin relevant again? At this point we know the guy was a loon who seemed to have more left then right affiliations. What that has to do with Sarah Palin, the Tea Party, or whatever other tar-feathered cause you want to denigrate - the argument here is, it is still irrelevant to what this guy did.

Perhaps, down the road if someone can connect her little map with targets to this guy, then sure, maybe it will be a worthwhile discussion. Right now it is pointless speculation. Only you and your buddies seem to be on that track at the moment - because, god forbid the guy was a left wing loon who decided to shoot a Blue Dog democrat. See those posts from DailyKOS about how the poster described her as 'dead to him' after they worked on her campaign a couple of years ago? Strangely, this kid worked for her a few years ago on a campaign with a letter from her acknowledging it ... oops.

And even if that turned out to be true, the only point would be that, again, it is the lefties shooting and killing people with guns, airplanes, etc.

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University

Registered Voter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> eesh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Registered Voter Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > eesh Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > RV, when confronted with an opposing and
> more
> > > > correct argument, resorts to attacking
> > posters'
> > > > grammar and spelling. Wow.
> > >
> > > eesh, when seeing his butt buddy Fairy
> getting
> > > beat up, come to the rescue with... nothing.
> > >
> > > Hey eesh - why don't you go troll someplace
> > > besides your basement?
> >
> >
> > RV, when seeing his rightard butt buddy Alias
> and
> > mcsmack getting beat up, comes to the rescue
> > with...nothing.
> >
> > Hey RV, why don't you go troll someplace
> besides
> > that "server room" that you have described as
> your
> > place of employment.
>
> eesh, I sense a definite 'stalker' mentality here.
> What do you do, collect various information people
> post about themselves so you can work up a case to
> out them or something? It is amazing how many
> times you pull up some comment that was made
> months, or even years ago that might be pertinent
> to personal details of people here.
>
> Really, get a life dude, you are sick.


Further proving that eesh has absolutely no life outside FFU. He is like some demented troll, like Rumpelstiltskin (only with a much smaller weenie). He is either in elementary school or in the mental ward and accessing the computer when Nurse Crachit goes on her rounds. Either way, he really is a bore. I'm still waiting for him to add an actual thought to a thread.

Sorry eesh, just calling it like I see it.

I smell...

::sniff sniff::

I smell...

::sniff::

SOCK PUPPETS !

eesh is satan Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
He is like some demented troll, like
> Rumpelstiltskin (only with a much smaller weenie).


Again with the thoughts on my penis size...there is something pathological about your obsession.


> Either way, he really
> is a bore.


I have been called many things, but being called another word for a drill is over the line buddy!

eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> kettler Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > fairfaxdude Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> >
> > > Another classic REGGIE-RETARD ad hominem tu
> > quoque
> > > retort X 4.
> >
> > Says the fairie who posts 90% of the time to
> > personally attack another poster. You might
> want
> > to look up the term hyocrite.
>
>
>
> I smell a deadbeat dad, 3x drunk driver in this
> thread.

LOL. You probably know the smell well because that tends to be the men you are attracted to.

Once again, eesh, you are wrong.

Care to guess again?

fairfaxdude Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

>
> If you read my post--which you clearly won't
> because it doesn't support your ridiculous
> attempts at ad hominem attacks and straw man
> arguments---per usual;
> you'll find I decidedly said it WASN'T relevant,
> merely a curious observation that you (and your
> ilk) are going to great lengths to avoid saying
> Palin exercised very poor judgment...nothing more,
> nothing less.
>
> Too bad the whole thread DOES exist for people who
> CAN read, huh, REG-TARD?


How's this homo: Palin did NOTHING wrong. NOTHING. There, does that sink into that empty space between your dumbo ears?

Registered Voter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> fairfaxdude Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Registered Voter Wrote:
> >
> > The reason none of us are talking
> > > about what YOU think is relevant - is that
> > Sarah
> > > Palin is not relevant to the whole issue. Do
> > you
> > > really believe this guy ever looked at her
> > website
> > > to see the crosshairs?
> >
> > Whether he did or didn't...YOU don't know
> either.
> > Using it as the basis for further argument is
> > stupid, as you attempt to do below.
>
> erm...what?
>
> So, you are saying you don't know - so again, why
> is Palin relevant again? At this point we know the
> guy was a loon who seemed to have more left then
> right affiliations. What that has to do with Sarah
> Palin, the Tea Party, or whatever other
> tar-feathered cause you want to denigrate - the
> argument here is, it is still irrelevant to what
> this guy did.
>
> Perhaps, down the road if someone can connect her
> little map with targets to this guy, then sure,
> maybe it will be a worthwhile discussion. Right
> now it is pointless speculation. Only you and your
> buddies seem to be on that track at the moment -
> because, god forbid the guy was a left wing loon
> who decided to shoot a Blue Dog democrat. See
> those posts from DailyKOS about how the poster
> described her as 'dead to him' after they worked
> on her campaign a couple of years ago? Strangely,
> this kid worked for her a few years ago on a
> campaign with a letter from her acknowledging it
> ... oops.
>
> And even if that turned out to be true, the only
> point would be that, again, it is the lefties
> shooting and killing people with guns, airplanes,
> etc.

You really are desparate, arent you? Don't work so hard; everybody here knows your game and the fact that you almost always get pwned in these debates, even if you don't get it. LOL

Again, i never said Palin was relevant to Loughner..I dont know, YOU dont know, and the rest of the retards on here dont either.

What I said was, IRREGARDLESS (LOL) of any relevancy, its curious to me that is the conversation about Palins "crosshairs", not ONE of you and your ilk could say..."yeah, that might not have been the smartest thing for her to do"...NOT ONE of yall. Instead, we see retard #13 supposing the crosshairs were airport symbols, and a few other's (retards 9, 17 and 23) spout out ridiculous phlegm about "Kill Bush", "flying planes into IRS buildings (oh wait that was you, retard #1) and other useless drivel.

So, please, save the pixels. I never said Palin's poor judgement was relevant.

______________________________________________
I have had to change the addresses to my retaliatory blogs over half a dozen times.

eesh Wrote:
---------------------------------------------------
pertinent
> > to personal details of people here.
> >
> > Really, get a life dude, you are sick.
>
>
> Yet you didn't complain when Vince(1)'s Facebook
> and real name were put on this site, did you? As
> long as someone you dislike is getting the
> personal attack, it's all kosher, right RV?

Sorry, I didn't out him, and if you look back at that thread, you all were going on for quite a while before I ever made my first post in that topic. And of the 5 or 6 posts I made, they were probably the least abusive, and least ill-meaning of the posts there other than a couple of folks who early said something about outing him.

Was it kosher? Nope. I don't believe anyone should be outed here - you all only use it as a form of intimidation, much like most of the other retarded posters like Fairy. If it isn't intimidation, it just isn't worth posting to some of you all. I would almost presume you were the one that outed him (under an alias) based on the way you dragged that little pertinent detail up and tossed it out there.

Again - little bit of stalker going on there eesh. You are getting kind of scary.

1.
...Re: Mr. Vince Trinka
Posted by: Registered Voter ()
Date: August 10, 2010 09:22AM

WingNut Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I'd kick this out as a warning to anyone who hates
> Vince or anyone who had words with him here that
> if something happened to him-serious harassment,
> etc. that it could be investigated and anyone who
> has said to Vince "go die motherfucker" on this
> board could be supeonaed or investigated. If Vince
> pulls a "Myspace Megan Suicide", or if someone
> pissed enough starts making phones calls or
> fucking with his house, it wouldn't be good for
> the board here at all. Also, pricks like him file
> nuisance lawsuits etc.
>
> Yes, give Vince the courtesy and decency he
> probably wouldn't accord you. Show him you are a
> stronger person. Seems like just a weak old crank
> that probably needs medication.

If you notice, in the conversations I have had with (R)V here - and the bashing I have done of him, I have never told him to kill himself. I think one time I told him to play in traffic or something, but in all of that I have never wished him dead. So I hope you are not referring to me in there - he is exactly that - a stupid ass who needs a life, and probably a mental rewiring. While I go off on him for being an absolute fucking idiot, I have never wished him ill.

On that note though, this guy's first page shows links I definitely would attribute to OUR (R)V here - check out his other and links that he likes. IF this is (R)V - and that is an interesting but speculative IF - the guy certainly seems to be, on the surface, a pretty close match. BTW - Annandale and Springfield can sometimes be interchanged, in particular if you live just to the south of Annandale...

2.
...Re: Mr. Vince Trinka
Posted by: Registered Voter ()
Date: August 10, 2010 09:53PM

What is up with the eesh shitstorm? I thought this was the "omg we are outing Vince(1)" thread. How many BS eesh/inka/ej-tard threads do we need exactly?

What, am I missing something? Did Inka somehow out Vince(1)? Seems kind of far-fetched - why would he? Did eesh? Why would he?

Seriously, there are definitely some lurking trolls here who seem to have nothing better to do than do mental jerk-off on this site. Seriously? Vince(1) has his issues, but at least he is an understandable whack-a-nut. To spend the time here to stalk eesh or whomever is pretty fucking pathetic in all honesty. Be proud of yourself wonder-troll, you are truly the Biggest Loser here....

Yeah, and to think I defended eesh in that thread. LOL.

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/10/2011 06:07PM by Registered Voter.

fairfaxdude Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Alias Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > The FBI should be monitoring WashingTone-Locian
> > and TheMeeper. Their ramblings would indicate
> a
> > break with reality.
> >
> > eesh might be added to the list if he doesn't
> snap
> > out of it.
>
>
> Wow, that's stupid, not to mention a worthless
> straw-man argument.
>

Yeah, that was pretty stupid, wasn’t it? I’m not a logical thinker like WashingTone-Locain or TheMeeper.
To make matters worse, I’m basically dishonest which explains my tendency to invent facts that fit my world view.
So, basically, I’m stupid, illogical and dishonest.

I'm like a total loser.

Do the regular Aholes on this site have to hijack EVERY SINGLE THREAD? Get a life, people.

Alias Wrote:

> Yeah, that was pretty stupid, wasn’t it? I’m
> not a logical thinker like WashingTone-Locain or
> TheMeeper.
> To make matters worse, I’m basically dishonest
> which explains my tendency to invent facts that
> fit my world view.
> So, basically, I’m stupid, illogical and
> dishonest.
>
> I'm like a total loser.

Well, I'm glad you could put the "crosshairs" on your issues and "zero in" on a self-diagnosis. Hopefully you can build on that, and things will be brighter in the morning.

______________________________________________
I have had to change the addresses to my retaliatory blogs over half a dozen times.

fairfaxdude Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Registered Voter Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > fairfaxdude Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Registered Voter Wrote:
> > >
> > > The reason none of us are talking
> > > > about what YOU think is relevant - is that
> > > Sarah
> > > > Palin is not relevant to the whole issue.
> Do
> > > you
> > > > really believe this guy ever looked at her
> > > website
> > > > to see the crosshairs?
> > >
> > > Whether he did or didn't...YOU don't know
> > either.
> > > Using it as the basis for further argument is
> > > stupid, as you attempt to do below.
> >
> > erm...what?
> >
> > So, you are saying you don't know - so again,
> why
> > is Palin relevant again? At this point we know
> the
> > guy was a loon who seemed to have more left
> then
> > right affiliations. What that has to do with
> Sarah
> > Palin, the Tea Party, or whatever other
> > tar-feathered cause you want to denigrate - the
> > argument here is, it is still irrelevant to
> what
> > this guy did.
> >
> > Perhaps, down the road if someone can connect
> her
> > little map with targets to this guy, then sure,
> > maybe it will be a worthwhile discussion. Right
> > now it is pointless speculation. Only you and
> your
> > buddies seem to be on that track at the moment
> -
> > because, god forbid the guy was a left wing
> loon
> > who decided to shoot a Blue Dog democrat. See
> > those posts from DailyKOS about how the poster
> > described her as 'dead to him' after they
> worked
> > on her campaign a couple of years ago?
> Strangely,
> > this kid worked for her a few years ago on a
> > campaign with a letter from her acknowledging
> it
> > ... oops.
> >
> > And even if that turned out to be true, the
> only
> > point would be that, again, it is the lefties
> > shooting and killing people with guns,
> airplanes,
> > etc.
>
> You really are desparate, arent you? Don't work so
> hard; everybody here knows your game and the fact
> that you almost always get pwned in these debates,
> even if you don't get it. LOL
>
> Again, i never said Palin was relevant to
> Loughner..I dont know, YOU dont know, and the rest
> of the retards on here dont either.
>
> What I said was, IRREGARDLESS of any
> relevancy...


Once again, retard: irregardless is an erroneous word that, etymologically, means the exact opposite of what it is used to express.

Registered Voter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I
> would almost presume you were the one that outed
> him (under an alias) based on the way you dragged
> that little pertinent detail up and tossed it out
> there.



Kinda like YOU KNOW that I was the one that made fun of you on WTOP's website, you know that incident where you said you hated FFXU and made sure WTOP's staff knew we were pulling a prank

fairfaxdude Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> So, please, save the pixels. I never said Palin's
> poor judgement was relevant.

No, of course not lol. Just that no one pointed out how much in bad taste her using the crosshairs were.

So you are making a point that Palin is somehow relevant to this discussion in your mind because no one commented on her bad judgment in using crosshairs.

Yeah, ok.

Let's all watch Fairy do the pretzel logic dance as he tries to repaint his, again, irrelevant postings on the topic.

Brilliant Fairy, give yourself a pat on the back there lol.

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University

fairfaxdude Wrote:
> I never said Palin's
> poor judgement was relevant.


To be honest, nothing you've said (or poster for that matter) has been relevant. But that doesn't seem to stop you, WTL, eesh and the rest of the libtards from frothing at the mouth and posting nonsense.

FairyTardMother Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Once again, retard: irregardless is an erroneous
> word that, etymologically, means the exact
> opposite of what it is used to express.




You think you're smart using words like erroneous and etymologically, don't you?

HINT: Using words that have more than three syllables doesn't make you less stupid.

eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Kinda like YOU KNOW that I was the one that made
> fun of you on WTOP's website, you know that
> incident where you said you hated FFXU and made
> sure WTOP's staff knew we were pulling a prank

Yeah, well since that was

1. based on a comment posted on their site using my name here

and

2. you are always coming in with that to try and discredit/intimidate me

Uh yeah eesh - because I notice it only gets brought up by YOU. Kind of leads me to believe that you were the pathetic, no life loser who had nothing better to do then spoof my name on other websites - based on some weird stalker fetish thing you seem to have going on here.

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University

ffxdude=grinchyclause Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> fairfaxdude Wrote:
> > I never said Palin's
> > poor judgement was relevant.
>
>
> To be honest, nothing you've said (or poster for
> that matter) has been relevant. But that doesn't
> seem to stop you, WTL, eesh and the rest of the
> libtards from frothing at the mouth and posting
> nonsense.


And the anonymous personal attacks you make contribute so much, right? What is your point of view in this matter? We haven't heard it because you are too busy being an idiot.

Registered Voter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> No, of course not lol. Just that no one pointed
> out how much in bad taste her using the crosshairs
> were.
>
> So you are making a point that Palin is somehow
> relevant to this discussion in your mind because
> no one commented on her bad judgment in using
> crosshairs.
>
> Yeah, ok.
>
> Let's all watch Fairy do the pretzel logic dance
> as he tries to repaint his, again, irrelevant
> postings on the topic.
>
> Brilliant Fairy, give yourself a pat on the back
> there lol.

Here--I'll let you read it again if you promise NOT to froth at the mouth and post useless drivel trying to twist my point into the one YOU want to debate.

"Whats interesting to me in this "debate", is that not one of the right-tards on here (Reggie the Dumbfuck...et al) have even acknowledged that a "national leader" might exercise better judgment than putting figurative crosshairs on political opponents...that it MIGHT not be the best idea she ever had."

______________________________________________
I have had to change the addresses to my retaliatory blogs over half a dozen times.

Registered Voter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> 2. you are always coming in with that to try and
> discredit/intimidate me



{Insert crybaby pic here.}