HomeFairfax General ForumArrest/Ticket SearchWiki newPictures/VideosChatArticlesLinksAbout
Off-Topic :  Fairfax Underground fairfax underground logo
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: facefactsnow ()
Date: October 19, 2010 12:58PM

Do people actually think he was good? He couldn't sing. His songs were horrifyingly bad. I don't get it. Why is he so beloved? Im sorry he was shot dead and all. That wasn't right. But to call him a great musician is really absurd.

Can someone explain?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: Highlander ()
Date: October 19, 2010 01:06PM

Cause he had a really hot wife...

Oh, wait........

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: stryker ()
Date: October 19, 2010 01:11PM

If only he wrote songs about sweet tea and porkers.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Date: October 19, 2010 01:19PM

facefactsnow Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Do people actually think he was good? He couldn't
> sing. His songs were horrifyingly bad. I don't get
> it. Why is he so beloved? Im sorry he was shot
> dead and all. That wasn't right. But to call him a
> great musician is really absurd.
>
> Can someone explain?


Imagine there's no fucktards, it's easy if you try.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: MrMephisto ()
Date: October 19, 2010 01:23PM

facefactsnow Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Do people actually think he was good? He couldn't
> sing. His songs were horrifyingly bad. I don't get
> it. Why is he so beloved? Im sorry he was shot
> dead and all. That wasn't right. But to call him a
> great musician is really absurd.
>
> Can someone explain?

Horrifyingly bad all the way to the bank.

--------------------------------------------------------------
13 4826 0948 82695 25847. Yes.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: Aqua Buddha ()
Date: October 19, 2010 01:26PM

yeah he was no Tiny Tim.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: BigK ()
Date: October 19, 2010 02:13PM

It is hard to explain unless you were there, and obviously you are not old enough to have been there. I am sure you think the music today is better???

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: Aqua Buddha ()
Date: October 19, 2010 02:15PM

That era was supposedly a "Golden Age" of Rock and pop. And I have ears to hear and make my own judgments. The music of today is hit or miss as far as what I like and dislike. But Music being subjective feel free to dislike John Lennon. It's all relative.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: themuse ()
Date: October 19, 2010 03:21PM

man, i thought conie would have been all over this thread by now.

yeefuckinghaw

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: facefactsnow ()
Date: October 19, 2010 03:21PM

BigK Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It is hard to explain unless you were there, and
> obviously you are not old enough to have been
> there. I am sure you think the music today is
> better???


Its not that today's music is any better. But his "music" is hardly the greatest. People get very upset if you dismiss him or the Beatles. But Im just not impressed. Perhaps he didn't "suck". Her certainly was not great. Average at best. His song "Woman" is very cliche and then he wrote that anti Jesus song, and he was also very pretentious in much of his working, saying he was bigger than Jesus. Thats just wrong. No one can top Jesus, Im sorry. But really the music ist just bla.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Date: October 19, 2010 03:28PM

facefactsnow Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> BigK Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > It is hard to explain unless you were there,
> and
> > obviously you are not old enough to have been
> > there. I am sure you think the music today is
> > better???
>
>
> Its not that today's music is any better. But his
> "music" is hardly the greatest. People get very
> upset if you dismiss him or the Beatles. But Im
> just not impressed. Perhaps he didn't "suck". Her
> certainly was not great. Average at best. His song
> "Woman" is very cliche and then he wrote that anti
> Jesus song, and he was also very pretentious in
> much of his working, saying he was bigger than
> Jesus. Thats just wrong. No one can top Jesus, Im
> sorry. But really the music ist just bla.


You're an idiot. If you have any understanding of music over the past 50 years, you don't have to like Lennon's music to recognize that what he and the Beatles did was innovative and groundbreaking. I don't like Elvis's music. But I sure the heck understand why he is considered so important in the history of rock music.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: Aqua Buddha ()
Date: October 19, 2010 03:33PM

Have you tried listening to John Lennon's music on Vinyl? It sounds SO much better than anything digital!

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: facefactsnow ()
Date: October 19, 2010 03:41PM

WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> facefactsnow Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > BigK Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > It is hard to explain unless you were there,
> > and
> > > obviously you are not old enough to have been
> > > there. I am sure you think the music today
> is
> > > better???
> >
> >
> > Its not that today's music is any better. But
> his
> > "music" is hardly the greatest. People get very
> > upset if you dismiss him or the Beatles. But Im
> > just not impressed. Perhaps he didn't "suck".
> Her
> > certainly was not great. Average at best. His
> song
> > "Woman" is very cliche and then he wrote that
> anti
> > Jesus song, and he was also very pretentious in
> > much of his working, saying he was bigger than
> > Jesus. Thats just wrong. No one can top Jesus,
> Im
> > sorry. But really the music ist just bla.
>
>
> You're an idiot. If you have any understanding of
> music over the past 50 years, you don't have to
> like Lennon's music to recognize that what he and
> the Beatles did was innovative and groundbreaking.
> I don't like Elvis's music. But I sure the heck
> understand why he is considered so important in
> the history of rock music.

Elvis could actually sing and had talent. IMO, I dont find The Beatles songs inspiring. Good music doesnt have to be "innovative". Which they were not. The Beatles were just a boy band and a high marketing scheme made it look like "The British Invasion". Listen to their early work. At least that was catchy. But its not innovative. They got pretentious. Recording someone repeating "Number 9" over and over again is not innovation or art. Its annoying.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: BigK ()
Date: October 19, 2010 03:52PM

Wait 10 or 20 years. When you grow up you will understand.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: MrMephisto ()
Date: October 19, 2010 04:04PM

BigK Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Wait 10 or 20 years. When you grow up you will
> understand.

He's a Toys R Us kid.

--------------------------------------------------------------
13 4826 0948 82695 25847. Yes.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: facefactsnow ()
Date: October 19, 2010 04:09PM

BigK Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Wait 10 or 20 years. When you grow up you will
> understand.


Wait til Im 40?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: themuse ()
Date: October 19, 2010 04:09PM

where in the world is connie miller?

yeefuckinghaw

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: MrMephisto ()
Date: October 19, 2010 04:15PM

themuse Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> where in the world is connie miller?

DO NOT SPEAK ITS NAME.

--------------------------------------------------------------
13 4826 0948 82695 25847. Yes.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: facefactsnow ()
Date: October 19, 2010 04:18PM

John Lennon couldn't sing. He wrote songs that lyrically were pathetic. How is that groundbreaking?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: October 19, 2010 04:20PM

Meade thread.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: MrMephisto ()
Date: October 19, 2010 04:21PM

facefactsnow Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> John Lennon couldn't sing. He wrote songs that
> lyrically were pathetic. How is that
> groundbreaking?

Please provide an example of someone who CAN sing, and whose lyrics you think are fantastic.

--------------------------------------------------------------
13 4826 0948 82695 25847. Yes.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Date: October 19, 2010 04:36PM

Nothing compares with the singing or lyrics of this young (early middle aged) man...


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Date: October 19, 2010 04:45PM

To be clear, the OP thinks John Lennon was great. It's Johnnon Lennon who sucked.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: October 19, 2010 04:52PM

themuse Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> man, i thought conie would have been all over this
> thread by now.





If you noticed, the forum has been free of references to eesh and boyfriend "McFistme" all day. I think it's safe to say when Conie isn't at a keyboard, most of the trolling goes away.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: Wahhh ()
Date: October 19, 2010 04:55PM

I received my first Conie PM yesterday. I was so thrilled that I went and took a marathon dump right afterwards. The turd coiled around the toilet into a giant letter C...mysterious indeed...



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/19/2010 04:56PM by Wahhh.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: facefactsnow ()
Date: October 19, 2010 04:59PM

WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Nothing compares with the singing or lyrics of
> this young (early middle aged) man...
>
> They Called Me Porker - The most popular videos
> are here


At least its more interesting. 31 is not middle aged. Besides, what does age have to do with anything? John Lennon wrote pretetious drivel at any age.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: letsfacefacts ()
Date: October 19, 2010 05:01PM

MrMephisto Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> facefactsnow Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > John Lennon couldn't sing. He wrote songs that
> > lyrically were pathetic. How is that
> > groundbreaking?
>
> Please provide an example of someone who CAN sing,
> and whose lyrics you think are fantastic.

Patsy Cline, Marty Robbins, Hank Williams Sr, John Denver, Johnathan Richman

Great lyrics dont have to be complex to be good. Many I mentioned had simple lyrics, yet they were brilliant.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: MrMephisto ()
Date: October 19, 2010 05:10PM

letsfacefacts Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Patsy Cline, Marty Robbins, Hank Williams Sr, John
> Denver, Johnathan Richman
>
> Great lyrics dont have to be complex to be good.
> Many I mentioned had simple lyrics, yet they were
> brilliant.

I think we're done here.

--------------------------------------------------------------
13 4826 0948 82695 25847. Yes.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Date: October 19, 2010 05:12PM

facefactsnow Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

>
> At least its more interesting. 31 is not middle
> aged.

Given his eating habits, it is for Meade.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: Conie ()
Date: October 19, 2010 05:15PM

themuse Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> where in the world is connie miller?


I'm right here.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: Gross ()
Date: October 19, 2010 05:17PM

WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Nothing compares with the singing or lyrics of
> this young (early middle aged) man...
>
> They Called Me Porker - The most popular videos
> are here






He looks really old for his age. Must be all that fat wearing down.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: themuse ()
Date: October 19, 2010 05:18PM

Wahhh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I received my first Conie PM yesterday. I was so
> thrilled that I went and took a marathon dump
> right afterwards. The turd coiled around the
> toilet into a giant letter C...mysterious
> indeed...


thank the gods she's transferred her obsession onto someone else.
i think i'll go take a marathon dump. . .

yeefuckinghaw

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: Conie ()
Date: October 19, 2010 05:53PM

WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> facefactsnow Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > BigK Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > It is hard to explain unless you were there,
> > and
> > > obviously you are not old enough to have been
> > > there. I am sure you think the music today
> is
> > > better???
> >
> >
> > Its not that today's music is any better. But
> his
> > "music" is hardly the greatest. People get very
> > upset if you dismiss him or the Beatles. But Im
> > just not impressed. Perhaps he didn't "suck".
> Her
> > certainly was not great. Average at best. His
> song
> > "Woman" is very cliche and then he wrote that
> anti
> > Jesus song, and he was also very pretentious in
> > much of his working, saying he was bigger than
> > Jesus. Thats just wrong. No one can top Jesus,
> Im
> > sorry. But really the music ist just bla.
>
>
> You're an idiot. If you have any understanding of
> music over the past 50 years, you don't have to
> like Lennon's music to recognize that what he and
> the Beatles did was innovative and groundbreaking.
> I don't like Elvis's music. But I sure the heck
> understand why he is considered so important in
> the history of rock music.


+1

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: Aqua Buddha ()
Date: October 19, 2010 06:01PM

facefactsnow Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Do people actually think he was good? He couldn't
> sing. His songs were horrifyingly bad. I don't get
> it. Why is he so beloved? Im sorry he was shot
> dead and all. That wasn't right. But to call him a
> great musician is really absurd.
>
> Can someone explain?


Who's this Johnnon Lennon guy anyway?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: Conie ()
Date: October 19, 2010 06:02PM

GTFO Eli

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: Aqua Buddha ()
Date: October 19, 2010 06:25PM

GTFO Conie!

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: Conie ()
Date: October 19, 2010 06:25PM

Aqua Buddha Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> GTFO Conie!


I was here first

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: Meade=aqua buddha ()
Date: October 19, 2010 06:26PM

Aqua Buddha Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> facefactsnow Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Do people actually think he was good? He
> couldn't
> > sing. His songs were horrifyingly bad. I don't
> get
> > it. Why is he so beloved? Im sorry he was shot
> > dead and all. That wasn't right. But to call him
> a
> > great musician is really absurd.
> >
> > Can someone explain?
>
>
> Who's this Johnnon Lennon guy anyway?


A singer you will never be as good as. Meade

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: Aqua Buddha ()
Date: October 19, 2010 06:28PM

Conie Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Aqua Buddha Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > GTFO Conie!
>
>
> I was here first


are you sure about that?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: aqua buddha=Meade ()
Date: October 19, 2010 06:30PM

Aqua Buddha Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Conie Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Aqua Buddha Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > GTFO Conie!
> >
> >
> > I was here first
>
>
> are you sure about that?


MEADE STFU

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: Aqua Buddha ()
Date: October 19, 2010 06:34PM

pls refer to me by my christian name Jesus little helper.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: Conie ()
Date: October 19, 2010 06:34PM

Aqua Buddha Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Conie Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Aqua Buddha Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > GTFO Conie!
> >
> >
> > I was here first
>
>
> are you sure about that?


No..I'm pretty sure I haven't been here as long as you have.

And i am also pretty sure you're a loser hiding behind multiple registered

names.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: themuse ()
Date: October 19, 2010 06:36PM

Conie Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Aqua Buddha Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Conie Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Aqua Buddha Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > GTFO Conie!
> > >
> > >
> > > I was here first
> >
> >
> > are you sure about that?
>
>
> No..I'm pretty sure I haven't been here as long as
> you have.
>
> And i am also pretty sure you're a loser hiding
> behind multiple registered
>
> names.


oooo, that's tellin' him, conie.
go die.

yeefuckinghaw

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: WingNut ()
Date: October 19, 2010 06:42PM

`


idontlikebeingrightaboutshitlikethisbutiam



Edited 21 time(s). Last edit at 5/31/1967 05:57AM by WingNut.

Last edit at 11/30/2015 01:37PM Last edit at 5/14/2015 03:52PM Last edit at 1/28/2014 05:57AM Last edit at 11/29/2015 01:10PM Last edit at 3/14/2011 11:52PM Last edit at 7/20/2012 04:07AM
Last edit at 6/29/2013 11:18PM Last edit at 3/19/2011 01:02PM Last edit at 3/26/2012 09:07PM



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 12/13/2015 11:24AM by WingNut.


Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: October 19, 2010 07:21PM

Lennon would have had a much better life and successful career if Yoko was never in the picture.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: notsoreally ()
Date: October 19, 2010 07:27PM

Gross Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Nothing compares with the singing or lyrics of
> > this young (early middle aged) man...
> >
> > They Called Me Porker - The most popular videos
> > are here
>
>
>
>
>
>
> He looks really old for his age. Must be all that
> fat wearing down.

He looks much younger than his age. I would have guessed early to mid 20s.
Thats an older video anyway.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: letsfacefacts ()
Date: October 19, 2010 07:28PM

WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> facefactsnow Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> >
> > At least its more interesting. 31 is not middle
> > aged.
>
> Given his eating habits, it is for Meade.


What is that supposed to mean? You post an old video of Meade. He looks a lot thinner now. And anyways, what do you know of his eating habits? A lot of skinny people can eat bad and not look fat on the outside.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: letsfacefacts ()
Date: October 19, 2010 07:31PM

If anyone looked way older than their age it was John Lennon.
Was he seriously 20 something in this picture? Yikes!


Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: October 19, 2010 07:37PM

letsfacefacts Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If anyone looked way older than their age it was
> John Lennon.
> Was he seriously 20 something in this picture?
> Yikes!





To be fair, most people looked older in those days than they do today.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: Conie ()
Date: October 19, 2010 07:38PM

letsfacefacts Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If anyone looked way older than their age it was
> John Lennon.
> Was he seriously 20 something in this picture?
> Yikes!
>
> http://topnews.in/light/files/John-Lennon_5.jpg


Why do you say that?

I think his eyelids were naturally relaxed.

What else about him looks old in that picture?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: letsfacefacts ()
Date: October 19, 2010 08:13PM

Conie Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> letsfacefacts Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > If anyone looked way older than their age it
> was
> > John Lennon.
> > Was he seriously 20 something in this picture?
> > Yikes!
> >
> > http://topnews.in/light/files/John-Lennon_5.jpg
>
>
> Why do you say that?
>
> I think his eyelids were naturally relaxed.
>
> What else about him looks old in that picture?

Not old, but definitely older than his age in the picture. Its just the lost of innocense in the eyes. Not a baby face for sure.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: Conie ()
Date: October 19, 2010 08:17PM

MrMephisto Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> themuse Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > where in the world is connie miller?
>
> DO NOT SPEAK ITS NAME.


Jesus Christ there's nothin i hate more than a follower

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: Teh King ()
Date: October 19, 2010 08:22PM

MrMephisto Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> Please provide an example of someone who CAN sing,
> and whose lyrics you think are fantastic.

Wayne Coyne of the Flaming Lips.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: Conie ()
Date: October 19, 2010 08:23PM

themuse Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Wahhh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I received my first Conie PM yesterday. I was
> so
> > thrilled that I went and took a marathon dump
> > right afterwards. The turd coiled around the
> > toilet into a giant letter C...mysterious
> > indeed...
>
>
> thank the gods she's transferred her obsession
> onto someone else.
> i think i'll go take a marathon dump. . .


You came on here less than 3 weeks ago.

Don't attack me and have an attitude when you know nothing about me.

You wanna fight? PM me bitch! But get it off the forum. You

don't know SHIT about me!

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Date: October 19, 2010 08:47PM

eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> letsfacefacts Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > If anyone looked way older than their age it
> was
> > John Lennon.
> > Was he seriously 20 something in this picture?
> > Yikes!
>
>
>
>
> To be fair, most people looked older in those days


By the tine Lennon was 31, he had led the most successful musical act of all time, been married and divorced, traveled the world hundreds of times over and did virtually every drug known.

Meade lives in his dad's attic and rarely leaves the house.


> than they do today.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: graymoose1 ()
Date: October 19, 2010 08:53PM

I hate to say it but I am not a fan of the Beetles either and I'm 52

---------------------------------------------------
W.W.S.D. what would Scooby Doo

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: letsfacefacts ()
Date: October 19, 2010 09:09PM

WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> eesh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > letsfacefacts Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > If anyone looked way older than their age it
> > was
> > > John Lennon.
> > > Was he seriously 20 something in this
> picture?
> > > Yikes!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > To be fair, most people looked older in those
> days
>
>
> By the tine Lennon was 31, he had led the most
> successful musical act of all time, been married
> and divorced, traveled the world hundreds of times
> over and did virtually every drug known.
>
> Meade lives in his dad's attic and rarely leaves
> the house.
>
>
> > than they do today.

Yes, and he was dead @ 40 years old. And he looked 60 when he died.As if using drugs are an accomplishment? Being secessful is relative. He was a success in the eyes of drugs addicts and people with bad taste in music.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: Aqua Buddha ()
Date: October 19, 2010 09:25PM

The point is. he lived a full and eventfull life. He partied HARD, did LOTS of drugs banged lots of groupies and contributed to the world with his ART which by measure of anything else out there was astounding.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: Teh King ()
Date: October 19, 2010 10:07PM

Lyrical genius (sincerely):

Please, please me, whoa yeah / Like I please you / You don't need me to show the way, love / Why do I always have to say, "love"?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: erik ()
Date: October 20, 2010 10:49PM

facefactsnow Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Do people actually think he was good? He couldn't
> sing. His songs were horrifyingly bad. I don't get
> it. Why is he so beloved? Im sorry he was shot
> dead and all. That wasn't right. But to call him a
> great musician is really absurd.
>
> Can someone explain?

Hey Meade,

Just wanted to say you're one tone deaf fucktard.

With the skin of a senior citizen.

And the heft of a narwhal.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: bloody blisters ()
Date: October 20, 2010 10:50PM

must kill johnnon lennon

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: Conie ()
Date: October 20, 2010 10:55PM

bloody blisters Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> must kill johnnon lennon


+1

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: Mr. Misery ()
Date: October 24, 2010 10:29PM

John Lennon was garbage. I'm glad he's dead.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: Conie ()
Date: October 24, 2010 10:31PM

Mr. Misery Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> John Lennon was garbage. I'm glad he's dead.


Fuck you Miz. What do you know about John Lennon?

You're like 25 years old?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: tomahawk ()
Date: October 24, 2010 10:46PM

I used to think the Beatles were overrated, especially when I was a teenager and thought I knew everything. But when you really look at the history of not just rock but most pop music, the Beatles do stand out as pioneers of the genre.

As for Lennon, I don't care for his solo stuff, but I really do like the later Beatles stuff, when they were getting more psychadelic.

I like these in particular:





Someone mentioned that the Beatles were a "boy band". Well, maybe. They were the first boy band, in that they had pussy literally passing out in their presence. But they were also the first of many other things, and they certainly had more talent and depth than any modern boy band. They were a real, no-shit rock and roll band. They were into psychadelia, and had they stuck around as a group longer they likely would have gotten even less commercial.

In fact, they are one of the few groups I know who made an honest attempt to become less commercial as they got more popular. Most bands sell out as they move forward; the Beatles struggled to stop selling out (not quite successfully, though). That's why their later stuff is cool compared to the early stuff.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/24/2010 10:51PM by tomahawk.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: Mr. Misery ()
Date: October 25, 2010 01:46AM

Bounty Killer is better than the beetles ever were

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: tomahawk ()
Date: October 25, 2010 06:11PM

Mr. Misery Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Bounty Killer is better than the beetles ever were


Bounty Who?

Lots of bands might have more talent, but they will never be remembered as legends, never influence the culture of the entire Western world. No Micheal Jacksons will ever pay millions for the rights to all their music.

And "better" is a subjective term when discussing music or art.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: Conie ()
Date: October 25, 2010 06:13PM

Mr. Misery Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Bounty Killer is better than the beetles ever were


It's "Beatles" Miz

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: rvashows ()
Date: October 25, 2010 06:56PM

tomahawk Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I used to think the Beatles were overrated,
> especially when I was a teenager and thought I
> knew everything. But when you really look at the
> history of not just rock but most pop music, the
> Beatles do stand out as pioneers of the genre.
>
> As for Lennon, I don't care for his solo stuff,
> but I really do like the later Beatles stuff, when
> they were getting more psychadelic.
>
> I like these in particular:
>
>
>
>
>
> Someone mentioned that the Beatles were a "boy
> band". Well, maybe. They were the first boy band,
> in that they had pussy literally passing out in
> their presence. But they were also the first of
> many other things, and they certainly had more
> talent and depth than any modern boy band. They
> were a real, no-shit rock and roll band. They were
> into psychadelia, and had they stuck around as a
> group longer they likely would have gotten even
> less commercial.
>
> In fact, they are one of the few groups I know who
> made an honest attempt to become less commercial
> as they got more popular. Most bands sell out as
> they move forward; the Beatles struggled to stop
> selling out (not quite successfully, though).
> That's why their later stuff is cool compared to
> the early stuff.


Let's break this down

The lyrics:

Not very good

The singing:
Not Very good

The guitar playing:
Decent

What about is revolutionary? Despite the name? Its really 4 very mediocore musicians trying hard to come up with weird stuff that was sparked by the Hippie Counter Culture movement. So by all means, they were nothing more than Pop band.

Everyone says Elvis never wrote his songs. But Elvis had a voice, and he had charisma and stage presence. He had authenticity in his music. He really loved his fans. The Beatles were just trying to be "bigger than Jesus".

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: tomahawk ()
Date: October 25, 2010 08:32PM

Elvis was good, but he was still doing country-derived rock.

As for stage presence, both Elvis and the Beatles had chicks passing out in front of the stage, so I think they were doing alright.

But, wait, you don't think the Beatles lyrics are very good? The lyrics are pretty much the best thing about their stuff. Their early stuff was simple love song pop stuff, but listen to the Day in the Life song above and see what you think. That's more than cheap pop, if not quite as deep as the Pink Floyd.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Johnnon Lennon sucked so bad...
Posted by: My way or the highway ()
Date: April 01, 2015 07:03PM

themuse Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> where in the world is connie miller?
Attachments:
66d8e9cda0a1d242772d2ea2103271d7.jpg

Options: ReplyQuote


Your Name: 
Your Email (Optional): 
Subject: 
Attach a file
  • No file can be larger than 75 MB
  • All files together cannot be larger than 300 MB
  • 30 more file(s) can be attached to this message
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **      **   *******   ********   **     **  ********  
 **  **  **  **     **  **     **  **     **  **     ** 
 **  **  **  **     **  **     **  **     **  **     ** 
 **  **  **   ********  ********   **     **  ********  
 **  **  **         **  **          **   **   **        
 **  **  **  **     **  **           ** **    **        
  ***  ***    *******   **            ***     **        
This forum powered by Phorum.