... when it comes to our own country and values he can't even quote the Declaration of Independence correctly - even with a teleprompter he manages to mangle it for some reason.



Seems he is starting to sport his 'X' look now.

EDIT: I posted this because it seems stupid he should go to great lengths to appease the rest of the world, but do seemingly stupid things that make it almost seems he is indifferent to the folks in his own country.

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/22/2010 10:06AM by Registered Voter.

The 'X' look is known as a 'black fade', aka; a fade done
by a person who is no good at doing fades.

Unless you are talking about the bow-tie. Then that is
not the 'X' look, it is the 'Mayor Anthony Williams' look.


.

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

Troll@AOL Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The 'X' look is known as a 'black fade', aka; a
> fade done
> by a person who is no good at doing fades.
>
> Unless you are talking about the bow-tie. Then
> that is
> not the 'X' look, it is the 'Mayor Anthony
> Williams' look.
>
>
> .

Ah, my bad. Yeah, the bow tie in the - I guess he is wearing a tuxedo which would explain it - just made him look all 'Nation of Islam' to me. I guess if he had the little styling haircut that would about complete it.

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University

Jesus. The guy is paraphrasing some of the language from the Declaration of Independence. And as for the "X" look, he was at a black-tie affair.

If you want to make legitimate criticisms of Obama's policies or even personal style, fine. But this kind of nitpicking over nothing makes you look stupid, RV.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

Oh, and speaking about TelePrompters. Here's a redneck TelePrompter...



---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Jesus. The guy is paraphrasing some of the
> language from the Declaration of Independence. And
> as for the "X" look, he was at a black-tie
> affair.
>
> If you want to make legitimate criticisms of
> Obama's policies or even personal style, fine. But
> this kind of nitpicking over nothing makes you
> look stupid, RV.

No, not really. As I said, he goes to great lengths for others - if he is going to take context from the Declaration of Independence, don't you think it is important enough of a document that he should quote it accurately? Especially when he is trying to make a point as to how important it is that we have come together as Americans after all these long years? He can paraphrase his thesis or a television commercial all he wants, but in the context of what he was trying to convey, he should have felt the document was important enough to accurately quote it.

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University

­



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 05/25/2014 02:45PM by chuckhoffmann.

chuckhoffmann Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Oh, and speaking about TelePrompters. Here's a
> > redneck TelePrompter...
>
> No, that is a redneck PDA.


Even better.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Oh, and speaking about TelePrompters. Here's a
> redneck TelePrompter...
>
>

And... she isn't the President is she? She is exactly that, a wannabee from Alaska. One with which you seem to think is somehow on par with Obama in his office. Nice put down. Seriously, she may have a great ability to raise money, but she is not ever going to get the nomination or be elected President. I know it is your wet dream or something, but seriously, you are just deluding yourself.

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University

Registered Voter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Jesus. The guy is paraphrasing some of the
> > language from the Declaration of Independence.
> And
> > as for the "X" look, he was at a black-tie
> > affair.
> >
> > If you want to make legitimate criticisms of
> > Obama's policies or even personal style, fine.
> But
> > this kind of nitpicking over nothing makes you
> > look stupid, RV.
>
> No, not really. As I said, he goes to great
> lengths for others - if he is going to take
> context from the Declaration of Independence,
> don't you think it is important enough of a
> document that he should quote it accurately?
> Especially when he is trying to make a point as to
> how important it is that we have come together as
> Americans after all these long years? He can
> paraphrase his thesis or a television commercial
> all he wants, but in the context of what he was
> trying to convey, he should have felt the document
> was important enough to accurately quote it.


You go to great lengths to feign outrage where none should exist.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

Registered Voter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Oh, and speaking about TelePrompters. Here's a
> > redneck TelePrompter...
> >
> >
>
> And... she isn't the President is she? She is
> exactly that, a wannabee from Alaska. One with
> which you seem to think is somehow on par with
> Obama in his office. Nice put down. Seriously, she
> may have a great ability to raise money, but she
> is not ever going to get the nomination or be
> elected President. I know it is your wet dream or
> something, but seriously, you are just deluding
> yourself.

If Sarah Palin decides to run for President, she will win the GOP nomination. Who is going to stop her? Romney? Gingrich? Really?

Now, will she win the General Election? I hope the hell not. But I wouldn't rule anything out.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You go to great lengths to feign outrage where
> none should exist.

First off, there was no outrage, feigned, or otherwise. It was merely a observation with kind of a question. I offered a comparison because I thought it was interesting the lengths he goes for other folks.

But no, no outrage.

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University

Registered Voter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> EDIT: I posted this because it seems stupid he
> should go to great lengths to appease the rest of
> the world, but do seemingly stupid things that
> make it almost seems he is indifferent to the
> folks in his own country.


I was beginning to think that I was the only one who felt that he spends more time appeasing other nations than ours. When I post anything hinting that on Yahoo news I get like a bajillion thumbs down.

I guess the US is overpopulated with Liberal douches who are in serious denial

WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If Sarah Palin decides to run for President, she
> will win the GOP nomination. Who is going to stop
> her? Romney? Gingrich? Really?
>
> Now, will she win the General Election? I hope the
> hell not. But I wouldn't rule anything out.

Which is probably why you aren't a paid political consultant. She won't win it.

This isn't like when we got to hear about Hillary for 4 years starting after the last election, and how she was the heir apparent - only to be upstaged by young Barry. She damaged herself so bad in the last election, and she still can't talk her way out of a paper bag with out crib notes. So while democrats are pinning their hopes on some wild pipe dream, the realty is - someone else will end up as the nomination - I will bet good money on that.

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University

Jesus Christ, you guys are the whiniest bunch of little bitches I have ever seen.

Voter____ Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Jesus Christ, you guys are the whiniest bunch of
> little bitches I have ever seen.

Says the whiniest of them all. What, you don't have your usual bevy of whiny political postings today where you offer nothing but the quoted opinion of others? Yeah V, you really made your point with that stupid comment.

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/22/2010 10:37AM by Registered Voter.

I like the part where Obama says "and Mexcians" because
people start uncontrollably yipping and trying to speak
over Obama in spanish.

You can tell by Obama's facial expression and how he
pauses or studders before he said it, that he was
expecting an "ape-ah ape-ah" or an "ondeleh-ondeleh"
or quite possibly an "arribah-arribah".

I'm just wondering where Obama's Mexican-flag lapel pin
was @.


.

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

Conservatives won't be happy unless Obama bans sharia law in the US.

Even though we don't have sharia law in the US.

Even though we already have laws banning religious law.

They live in a fucking fantasy world they gets more delusional every time I open one of these stupid threads.

Registered Voter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

>
> Which is probably why you aren't a paid political
> consultant. She won't win it.
>


First, that's an idiotic statement about political consultants. Plenty of people who don't win the nomination have paid political consultants. Hell, I'm sure Rove worked on some unsuccessful campaigns in his day.

Second, I am fairly confident she would get the GOP nomination if she decided to run. The GOP has bent over backwards not to alienate the Tea Baggers. In return, they will do to the GOP Presidential nomination what they did to the Senate nominations this time out.

Look at Delaware. You doubt the Tea Baggers can't do that on a national level?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

Speaking of idiocy and living in your own
fucking fantasy world, check out this quote;


"I know which verses to read in the Koran"
-Feisal Abdul Rauf




.

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

Troll@AOL Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Speaking of idiocy and living in your own
> fucking fantasy world, check out this quote;
>
>
> "I know which verses to read in the Koran"
> -Feisal Abdul Rauf
>
>
>
>
> .


I would assume you read all Bible verses then?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

Registered Voter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Seems he is starting to sport his 'X' look now.
>





Black tie event doesn't mean he's Malcolm X. You're a fucking idiot.

eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> Black tie event doesn't mean he's Malcolm X.

You honestly expect the average conservative to understand a "black tie event"? Silly you. Obama should be wearing a baseball hat, ranting about Muslims, and eating fast food.

I don't get this.

Conservatives are supposed to be wealthy know it alls who benefit from tax cuts and drive big SUVs.

You're saying that they wear only baseball hats and eat fast food.

Which one is it?

WTL wrote:
> "I would assume you read all Bible verses then?"

YES I HAVE READ IT, VERSE FOR VERSE.

POINT?


.

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

ITRADE Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I don't get this.
>
> Conservatives are supposed to be wealthy know it
> alls who benefit from tax cuts and drive big
> SUVs.
>
> You're saying that they wear only baseball hats
> and eat fast food.
>
> Which one is it?

Conservative leaders do the former. Conservative voters do the latter.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

TheMeeper Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> eesh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >
> > Black tie event doesn't mean he's Malcolm X.
>
> You honestly expect the average conservative to
> understand a "black tie event"? Silly you.
> Obama should be wearing a baseball hat, ranting
> about Muslims, and eating fast food.

Like this conservative?

WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ITRADE Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I don't get this.
> >
> > Conservatives are supposed to be wealthy know
> it
> > alls who benefit from tax cuts and drive big
> > SUVs.
> >
> > You're saying that they wear only baseball hats
> > and eat fast food.
> >
> > Which one is it?
>
> Conservative leaders do the former. Conservative
> voters do the latter.

Wow, generalize much?

Troll@AOL Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> WTL wrote:
> > "I would assume you read all Bible verses
> then?"
>
> YES I HAVE READ IT, VERSE FOR VERSE.
>
> POINT?
>
>
> .

So you make a point of not being around a woman with a period for seven days? I trust you follow every verse in the Bible and don't choose to follow some and ignore others, right?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ITRADE Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I don't get this.
> >
> > Conservatives are supposed to be wealthy know
> it
> > alls who benefit from tax cuts and drive big
> > SUVs.
> >
> > You're saying that they wear only baseball hats
> > and eat fast food.
> >
> > Which one is it?
>
> Conservative leaders do the former. Conservative
> voters do the latter.

I didn't realize all the workers at McDonalds were conservatives.

Capt. Obvious Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> >
> > Conservative leaders do the former.
> Conservative
> > voters do the latter.
>
> Wow, generalize much?


I've been called a gay communist terrorist lover, so it goes both ways.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

ITRADE Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> > Conservative leaders do the former.
> Conservative
> > voters do the latter.
>
> I didn't realize all the workers at McDonalds were
> conservatives.


Actually, all the workers at McDonalds are Mexicans.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Capt. Obvious Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > >
> > > Conservative leaders do the former.
> > Conservative
> > > voters do the latter.
> >
> > Wow, generalize much?
>
>
> I've been called a gay communist terrorist lover,
> so it goes both ways.

I don't care if you go both ways!


Oh wait, must have misread that. My bad.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/22/2010 11:14AM by Capt. Obvious.

But they wear hats and eat fast food. Must be conservatives. And, just to correct the record, most are Salvadorans, Hondurans, and from parts south.

There are very few Mexicans in the DC area.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/22/2010 11:16AM by ITRADE.

WTL wrote:
> "I've been called a gay communist
terrorist lover, so it goes both ways."

Maybe you do go 'both ways' and are.


.

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

ITRADE wrote:
> "There are very few Mexicans in the DC area."

SORRY, BUT THIS IS FALSE.


.

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

Michael Moore is a secret muslim.

TRUE.


.

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

TheMeeper Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Michael Moore is a secret muslim.

Who happens to fit every single criteria you listed to be a conservative?

Capt. Obvious Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> Who happens to fit every single criteria you
> listed to be a conservative?

Maybe they should check his birth certificate to see if he's a fake liberal.

TheMeeper Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Capt. Obvious Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >
> > Who happens to fit every single criteria you
> > listed to be a conservative?
>
> Maybe they should check his birth certificate to
> see if he's a fake liberal.

Or maybe they should try to do a citizens arrest of him at a book signing. Or perhaps sit in the back of a public hearing in some gaudy clothes and shour juvenile and asinine insults. That usually works well, right?

I don't think he is anything but a true liberal. It is just strange you think he is conservative.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/22/2010 11:32AM by Capt. Obvious.

The Meeper wrote:
> "Maybe they should check his birth certificate
to see if he's a fake liberal."

Don't bother, he'll just produce an unsigned illegible
rubber-stamped bogus proxy document, and claim it genuine.


.

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

Capt. Obvious Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> I don't think he is anything but a true liberal.
> It is just strange you think he is conservative.

He's an anti-colonial Kenyan, a Nazi, and a black guy.

TheMeeper Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Capt. Obvious Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >
> > I don't think he is anything but a true liberal.
>
> > It is just strange you think he is
> conservative.
>
> He's an anti-colonial Kenyan, a Nazi, and a black
> guy.

At least you are conistent in the notion you think he is a conservative and nazi. I will have to readjust my monitor if he is indeed black.

Looks like I don't have enough monitor adjustment to compensate.


.

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

Voter____ Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Jesus Christ, you guys are the whiniest bunch of
> little bitches I have ever seen.

This from the guy who whines about George Bush like it is 2006. Too funny.

When Obama starts an unnecessary war, destroys the economy, and leaves us with a lost decade you'll have my permission to whine.


Capt. Obvious Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Voter____ Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Jesus Christ, you guys are the whiniest bunch
> of
> > little bitches I have ever seen.
>
> This from the guy who whines about George Bush
> like it is 2006. Too funny.

Voter____ Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> When Obama starts an unnecessary war, destroys the
> economy, and leaves us with a lost decade you'll
> have my permission to whine.

2 out of 3 ain't bad....

Heh, my salary went up by 2.5 times between 2000 and 2010.

Win for me.

Muslim butts. Heh.

Typical Republican thinking. Find one data point that suits your needs and run with it. It's snowing outside, therefore global warming is a fraud.


ITRADE Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Heh, my salary went up by 2.5 times between 2000
> and 2010.
>
> Win for me.

ITRADE Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Heh, my salary went up by 2.5 times between 2000
> and 2010.
>
> Win for me.

+1

3.5 times for me. Looks like that is at least 2 data points.

Well, let's see what it looked like to the rest of the country (hey, it's easy to double your income when you are still in your twenties):

The past decade was the worst for the U.S. economy in modern times, a sharp reversal from a long period of prosperity that is leading economists and policymakers to fundamentally rethink the underpinnings of the nation's growth.

It was, according to a wide range of data, a lost decade for American workers. The decade began in a moment of triumphalism -- there was a current of thought among economists in 1999 that recessions were a thing of the past. By the end, there were two, bookends to a debt-driven expansion that was neither robust nor sustainable.

There has been zero net job creation since December 1999. No previous decade going back to the 1940s had job growth of less than 20 percent. Economic output rose at its slowest rate of any decade since the 1930s as well.

Middle-income households made less in 2008, when adjusted for inflation, than they did in 1999 -- and the number is sure to have declined further during a difficult 2009. The Aughts were the first decade of falling median incomes since figures were first compiled in the 1960s.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/01/AR2010010101196.html

Capt. Obvious Wrote:
>
> +1
>
> 3.5 times for me. Looks like that is at least 2
> data points.

Voter____ Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Well, let's see what it looked like to the rest of
> the country (hey, it's easy to double your income
> when you are still in your twenties):
>
> The past decade was the worst for the U.S. economy
> in modern times, a sharp reversal from a long
> period of prosperity that is leading economists
> and policymakers to fundamentally rethink the
> underpinnings of the nation's growth.
>
> It was, according to a wide range of data, a lost
> decade for American workers. The decade began in a
> moment of triumphalism -- there was a current of
> thought among economists in 1999 that recessions
> were a thing of the past. By the end, there were
> two, bookends to a debt-driven expansion that was
> neither robust nor sustainable.
>
> There has been zero net job creation since
> December 1999. No previous decade going back to
> the 1940s had job growth of less than 20 percent.
> Economic output rose at its slowest rate of any
> decade since the 1930s as well.
>
> Middle-income households made less in 2008, when
> adjusted for inflation, than they did in 1999 --
> and the number is sure to have declined further
> during a difficult 2009. The Aughts were the first
> decade of falling median incomes since figures
> were first compiled in the 1960s.
>
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/artic
> le/2010/01/01/AR2010010101196.html
>
> Capt. Obvious Wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > 3.5 times for me. Looks like that is at least
> 2
> > data points.

My salary is 2/3 of what it was in 2000 - but I don't blame the Republicans for it. I blame recessions of which we had little control, and more recently 9/11 which was when my salary took a major hit due to layoffs tied to the severe downturn it caused. Bush's tax cuts had nothing to do with it (as they hadn't happened) - nor did the modest yearly deficit they had during the early Bush years. Funny to call those deficits modest, but the ones we are seeing today are out of control. I know when we continue to have poor salary numbers for years to come who is to blame, especially with the massive increases in health care costs we are incurring due to the health care changes - they will offset any positive salary gains for quite a while.

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University

You know there are Muslims in our country, right?

Registered Voter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> [He will bend over backwards for Muslims but...]
> ... when it comes to our own country and values he...

Signatures are for fags

Harry Tuttle Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You know there are Muslims in our country, right?
>
> Registered Voter Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >
> > ... when it comes to our own country and values
> he...

When they become a larger minority they can become more significant - they had little to do with the last 200 years.

List of countries by Muslim population
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_Muslim_population
United States 2,454,000 - not even 1%

Group: Muslim Population Overstated (old article but relevant)
http://www.adherents.com/largecom/com_islam_usa.html

http://www.allied-media.com/AM/

At the high end folks estimate there could be up to 8 million. Still, not significant.

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University

Voter___ wrote:
> "When Obama starts an unnecessary war,"
HE HAS NOT STOPPED ANY.

> "destroys the economy,"
HE CALLED IT THE 'BAILOUT'

> "and leaves us with a lost decade"
WE WERE SET BACK A DECADE FINANCIALLY AT
ABOUT 1 MONTH INTO HIS TERM.

> "you'll have my permission to whine."
GEE THANKS. BUT THAT'S OKAY, YOU DEMS ALREADY
DO ENOUGH BITCHING FOR THE BOTH OF US.



.

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal...
http://www.ushistory.org/declaration/document/

Registered Voter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> When they become a larger minority they can become
> more significant - they had little to do with the
> last 200 years.
>
> At the high end folks estimate there could be up
> to 8 million. Still, not significant.

Signatures are for fags

Harry Tuttle Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all
> men are created equal...
> http://www.ushistory.org/declaration/document/
>
> Registered Voter Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > When they become a larger minority they can
> become
> > more significant - they had little to do with
> the
> > last 200 years.
> >
> > At the high end folks estimate there could be
> up
> > to 8 million. Still, not significant.

No one is talking about them being treated worse than other people dickwad. They are being treated with BETTER than others. Your quoting that statement means... yeah that you don't have a clue, or any place in this conversation other than as a bookend.

Idiot.

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University

Capt. Obvious Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ITRADE Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Heh, my salary went up by 2.5 times between
> 2000
> > and 2010.
> >
> > Win for me.
>
> +1
>
> 3.5 times for me. Looks like that is at least 2
> data points.


Let's just say that I pay more in taxes now in a year than I made in 2000. But I think it is just the price of living in a country where I have the opportunity to do that.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

RegVote wrote - My salary is 2/3 of what it was in 2000....

maybe you should blame yourself for your own shortcomings.....or you could post less and do something productive to increase your earning power....quit blaming the recession

Registered Voter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> No one is talking about them being treated worse
> than other people dickwad.

No one said that anyone is talking about them being treated worse...

> They are being treated
> with BETTER than others.

How?

> Your quoting that
> statement means... yeah that you don't have a
> clue, or any place in this conversation other than
> as a bookend.

You said that Muslims don't matter because they are such a small minority... If you actually believed what is written in the Declaration of Independence, you would know that everyone should matter equally... regardless of their degree of minority...

>
> Idiot.

Is name calling really necessary? Do you think it is helping you make your point somehow?

Signatures are for fags

Advice Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> RegVote wrote - My salary is 2/3 of what it was in
> 2000....
>
> maybe you should blame yourself for your own
> shortcomings.....or you could post less and do
> something productive to increase your earning
> power....quit blaming the recession

Take your own advice and post less.

Nothing to blame myself for. I have friends that lost their homes, shit everything due to the recessions, and they were in the same field. The only folks that really made out since 2000 are folks on Wall Street, and those with high end clearances. I could go out and get a higher paying job today - close to what I was making back then - but the job I am in now is better positioned for the current economy. Besides, even at 2/3 I still make good money - just I know a lot of people that are making less then they made in the year 2000.

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University

Harry Tuttle Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> > Idiot.
>
> Is name calling really necessary? Do you think it
> is helping you make your point somehow?

You missed the point, thus calling you names really had nothing involved other than to show how stupid your comment was.

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University

Harry Tuttle Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Registered Voter Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > No one is talking about them being treated
> worse
> > than other people dickwad.
>
> No one said that anyone is talking about them
> being treated worse...
>
> > They are being treated
> > with BETTER than others.
>
> How?
>
> > Your quoting that
> > statement means... yeah that you don't have a
> > clue, or any place in this conversation other
> than
> > as a bookend.
>
> You said that Muslims don't matter because they
> are such a small minority... If you actually
> believed what is written in the Declaration of
> Independence, you would know that everyone should
> matter equally... regardless of their degree of
> minority...
>
> >
> > Idiot.
>
> Is name calling really necessary? Do you think it
> is helping you make your point somehow?


You're just like my father Harry Tuttle

You attack, and you're defensive because you know you're

not smart enough to defend yourself here.

So just stay out of the conversation.

That's what I do.

I think I got your point...

"OBAMA CAN'T EVEN READ THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE, A DOCUMENT THAT I DON'T EVEN REALLY BELIEVE IN, CORRECTLY OFF OF A TELEPROMPTER BECAUSE ALL HE CARES ABOUT ARE MUSLINS (WHICH AREN'T REAL AMERIKANS LIKE I AM)."

Again I ask: Was name calling really necessary?

Registered Voter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You missed the point, thus calling you names
> really had nothing involved other than to show how
> stupid your comment was.

Signatures are for fags

Harry Tuttle Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>Again I ask: Was name calling really necessary?

Ok, you are truly a fucking idiot, is that better? Not calling you a name, just stating the truth.

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University

but why are you making less now than in 2000? is it because you didn't position yourself properly in the chain of management? was it political? did people not really like you too much? are you one of those creepy, quiet co-workers than make people avoid you? and, what industry? help us understand your freefall from grace.

Look, RV! Over there! It's some FUN!

Quick! Go ruin it!

--------------------------------------------------------------
13 4826 0948 82695 25847. Yes.

stumped Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> but why are you making less now than in 2000? is
> it because you didn't position yourself properly
> in the chain of management? was it political?
> did people not really like you too much? are you
> one of those creepy, quiet co-workers than make
> people avoid you? and, what industry? help us
> understand your freefall from grace.


2/3 is a pretty significant hit...especially over 10 years of inflation. RV must have stop putting out for his gay boss.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

> 2/3 is a pretty significant hit...especially over 10 years of inflation.


People just don't get their shoes shined anymore like they used to. Sorry RV.

And... still nothing.

But good, glad folks want to direct attention elsewhere rather than acknowledge the truth of this thread.

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University

Registered Voter, when people ask you legitimate questions and want to have an intelligent conversation, you don't lash out and call them idiots because you suspect they have an opposing view. This is something Vince(1) did on a daily basis, and you are becoming more like your nemesis with each post.


These are basic social skills, something you clearly lack. I recently heard a statistic that 66% of people are fired because of a "lack of human relations skills." I think this explains why you are making less money than 10 years ago, even counting for inflation.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/22/2010 05:05PM by eesh.

eesh knows how to direct attention elsewhere. Way to go eesh.


.

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

Eesh will bend over anyway for anyone...

eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Registered Voter, when people ask you legitimate
> questions and want to have an intelligent
> conversation, you don't lash out and call them
> idiots because you suspect they have an opposing
> view. This is something Vince(1) did on a daily
> basis, and you are becoming more like your nemesis
> with each post.
>
>
> These are basic social skills, something you
> clearly lack. I recently heard a statistic that
> 66% of people are fired because of a "lack of
> human relations skills." I think this explains why
> you are making less money than 10 years ago, even
> counting for inflation.

No eesh, I have always responded that way here. Nothing in your post explains much of anything other than your usual delusions. Just as you sit and lash out at your various detractors in weird ways - such as sending porn PMs and such - I tend to 'flame' them in the normal way that has been used on internet based boards for years. Vince(1) - my old buddy - was just totally delusional, and many of his responses made no sense in and of themselves, even if he was just posting about how the sun moved through the sky during the day. I suppose if you think sending porn PMs is a normal social skill, then more power to ya.

Maybe if you actually asked a legitimate question... or even just a question. Usually you are just making comments in insanely long threads of back and forth over absolutely nothing. But if that is what floats your boat, go for it. Otherwise, yeah - STFU.

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University

Yeah

STFU Eesh

All you know is what you Google.

Registered Voter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

>
> Maybe if you actually asked a legitimate
> question... or even just a question. Usually you
> are just making comments in insanely long threads
> of back and forth over absolutely nothing. But if
> that is what floats your boat, go for it.
> Otherwise, yeah - STFU.




With an attitude like that buddy, no raise for you this year! Looks like you're stuck making "2/3 of your income in 2000." LMAO, whatever that means.

eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Registered Voter Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> >
> > Maybe if you actually asked a legitimate
> > question... or even just a question. Usually
> you
> > are just making comments in insanely long
> threads
> > of back and forth over absolutely nothing. But
> if
> > that is what floats your boat, go for it.
> > Otherwise, yeah - STFU.
>
>
>
>
> With an attitude like that buddy, no raise for you
> this year! Looks like you're stuck making "2/3 of
> your income in 2000." LMAO, whatever that means.


Ooh, you got me there eesh-tard. Way to go!

lol@eesh for completing his journey to the dark side.

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University

John Luc eesh-Tard, Commander of the FU Enterprise.


.

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

Beotch Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Eesh will bend over anyway for anyone...

Aaaaand here we go.

Why don't you start one thread for all of your lame comebacks?

--------------------------------------------------------------
13 4826 0948 82695 25847. Yes.

Stop talking to yourself Mephisto.

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Jesus. The guy is paraphrasing some of the
> language from the Declaration of Independence. And
> as for the "X" look, he was at a black-tie
> affair.
>
> If you want to make legitimate criticisms of
> Obama's policies or even personal style, fine. But
> this kind of nitpicking over nothing makes you
> look stupid, RV.


+1

WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ITRADE Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > > Conservative leaders do the former.
> > Conservative
> > > voters do the latter.
> >
> > I didn't realize all the workers at McDonalds
> were
> > conservatives.
>
>
> Actually, all the workers at McDonalds are
> Mexicans.


ALL MOST*

Mexicans? That explains the piss poor service for the past few years.

.

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

Firratte wrote:
> "+1"

-2 for being a faggy douchebag.


.

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.