NOT EVERY BALTIC NATION is part of Russia. That's stupid to say to begin with.

Xiden Biden is selling weapons HE KNOWS WILL BE USED BY CHINESE AND FACISTS

Ukraine double crossed Russia they will double us cross weapon sales also. (they will re-sell them to nations that hate USA, steal technology, what)

USA during cold war likely did "help de-stabilize" Russia border nations - while at the same time Russia had taken hostile actions toward USA. That was then - russia was a military juggernaut seeking to expand by force.


However - not everyone agreed it was a good idea for a "a part of Russia with nuclear weapons" to be de-stabilized, in war with Russia - with Russia fighting to secure a nuclear arsenal. Some thought that was a step too far and dangerous for the World. Better the russians (and their scientists) have them and decide than "who knows who" doing it.


Between a cold war and "stray nuclear weapons being sold to hostile nations". There's a difference. And the difference is stray nuclear weapons sold to really nasty nations who aren't mature enough to either protect them (that they not be stolen) nor to decide whether to use them.

Nuclear weapons and Ukraine - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Nuclear_weapons_and...
Prior to 1991, Ukraine was part of the Soviet Union and had Soviet nuclear weapons in its territory. On December 1, 1991, Ukraine, the second most

FOR STUPID MILLENIALS: THIS HAS BEEN GOING ON SINCE 1991

NOT EVERYONE IN 1990'S CHEERED TO UKRAINE AND WHAT THEY DID. SOME THOUGHT THAT STEALING NUCLEAR WEAPONS FROM A NATION THE SIZE OF RUSSIA WAS TANTEMOUNT TO GUARANTEED WAR.

SOME THOUGHT that "if they wanted to be free they should have made ammends to return Russian assets so that Russia might not kill to get them back" (that stealing nuclear weapons was not something USA should cheer about - they could get sold to IRAN by the same people who didn't want to pay russian taxes, be lost, or worse used in a war while russia attacked to regain them)

Many nations on russian border, in the 1990's, "THREATENED TO SUCCEED" and Russia threatened to keep the country together - ending with gorbachev and all that mess roughly speaking news wise.

THE REASONS FOR NON-PROLIFERATION

QUESTION: were countries who could not protect and secure Nuclear Weapons banned from having them? YES. for many reasons. Nuclear Power Plants were included in the BAN. A nation such as Afghanistan, who might have "marauders who steal uranium" is a pain in the world's back side. Nations like USA and Russia would then have to flip the bill to "GO GET THE MISSING URANIUM AT ANY COST" from a rag-tag nation that obtained it.

technically, the non-proliferation agreement with Russia was broken - russia lost warheads to "insurrection" it was un-able to control. it's yet to be know if that nation might "continue to sell these to IRAN for oil". once a theif always a thief is predictable outcome

QUESTION: was "use of AI and any computer whatsoever banned from launch ability". YES - both russia and USA found out the hard way that electronics are not suitable for purpose. it HAD BEEN BANNED but you can count on asians and iranians to do "everything backwards and stupid, thinking they are smarter" - possibly leading to a MEGA CATASTROPHY

QUESTION: is it dangerous? Yes. it makes an area un-inhabitable for long periods of time (depends on kind)

QUESTION: is it wasteful? Yes. they cost allot of money

QUESTION: are their dangers of lost nuclear weapons? YES - some have been lost at sea and if they (perhaps unlikely) detonated there would be part of the sea bed damaged/poisoned for very long periods of time - perhaps even show up on some shore

ELECTRONIC ATTACK: china has implemented world-wide policy to "take over the worlds electronics, be able to disable all communications and information from china". But we already know these don't disable Nuclear Weapons from the above. However - china "deciding to shut down a nation" would initiate Nuclear Weapons to launch by hand.

IS PROLIFERATION OF ELECTRONIC ATTACKS (BOTH VIRUS SOFTWARE AND VIRUS MACHINE) A KIND OF PROLIFERATION EXACTLY AS DANGEROUS?

CAN BREACHED PROLIFERATION OF BOTH LEAD TO A REAL NUCLAR WAR? WHERE CITIZENS TAKE THE BEATING AND THE RICH PUT THEIR FEET UP AT THE FIRE LAUGHING THEY'VE FINALLY GOTTEN RID OF THE POOR? IT COULD.


HAVE NON-PROLIFERATION AGREEMENTS BEEN BREACHED? ABSOLUTELY, YES

ARE WORLD AGREEMENTS AGAINST NUCLEAR AND ELECTRONIC VIRUS BEING FOUGHT?

NO - XIDEN BIDEN types in all euro nations are selling out their country for backdoor benefits


YOU HAVE XIDEN BIDEN TYPES "in charge of selling out their nation to enemy states - selling off their own citizens for chinese and iranian india etc chitz"

=================================

these were the worries of the 1990's

And since the 1990's Russia has said Ukraine and Russia's nuclear weapons in Ukraine: were going to be back in Russia's hands.

Let's take a look at Ukraine:

* they say they "want to be independant"

* ok what's in this bag? farms and a little industry?

* NO - nuclear weapons, russian weapons, allot of natural resources, and machinery russia had (been in control of) via taxation and spending under russian control

* SO - you say you WANT TO BE FREE but your like a nigger walking out of walmart who wants to be "free not to pay taxes, free to walk off with goods", is that correct?

* SO THIS ISN'T ABOUT FREEDOM - and that leads us back to

NON-PROLIFERATION TREATY

"that a nation which could secure nuclear weapons, develope their own, was sufficient"

COULD NEED EDITING

since what we see is that "bad poilticians, and spy-virus technology, proliferate to a degree that surpasses any ability to keep NUCLEAR WEAPONS SECURE"

which comes back to THAT FUCKING BASTARD OBAMA, FRANCE, AND IRAN

and also to "why Russia and USA have not done more to stop proliferation" since 1990's. for instance: they proliferated Korea, Iran, China, Pakistan, India, likely Afghanistan begun, others, with NUCLEAR WEAPONS

the UN inspections stopped

the "threats by nuclear bearing nations" have escalated

AND XIDEN BIDEN TYPES HAVE BENEFITTED - it turns out they are not prevented by nuclear threats. It turns out the "country betrayers" actually thrive in breaching proliferation and virus treaties.

NON-PROLIFERATION TREATY

"that a nation which could secure nuclear weapons, develope their own, was sufficient"

A USA OR RUSSIA CANNOT KEEP THEM SAFE.

* NON-USE OF ELECTRONIC LAUNCH - WAS NOT ENOUGH. and china or india or both won't follow any such rules. who knows what crazy iranians might do

* NON-PROLIFERATION DIDN'T WORK - xiden biden types bent over to sell always with the excuse "they were helping thwart the enemy"


A SECRET BECOMING AN NON-SECRET IS A BREACH NO MATTER WHAT THE REASONS - and democrats always have some fucking excuse


* SECURITY OF ARESENALS - TURNED OUT TO BE A FALLACY

they are certainly not secure from political take-overs (ukraine) nor from military ones (something like iraq)

* SECURITY OF POWER PLANTS and "THE PURITY OF SCIENTISTS" - also turned out to be a fallacy

What fallicy will pop up next - the few that haven't been proven un-true in the space of just a few decades ?

WHICH LEADS TO THE STATEMENTS:

1) Ukraine should immediately forefeit any nuclear weapons to Russia

2) Nuclear Weapon agreements - laws against making them, and CONSEQUENCES FOR THOSE WHO BREACH IT, should go forward not backward

3) electronic spy/virus "one nation shutting down anothers communications via products sold on the market without any WARNING LABEL", should be added to these "agreements"

another PLAIN OUTCOME in all this is ...

if Ukraine gave back what they stole (nuclear weapons, factory, agreed to share resources)

they wouldn't have political vote and motive toward trying to "become free"

it's all just lies

HILLARY AND BILL CLINTON - THE DEMOCRATS - SOLD ALLOT OF URANIUM TO RUSSIA

that's a plain fact

that's fuel USA could have burned to reduce oil consumption


the idea USA would benefit from Ukraine gaining WEAPONS uranium and that's Xiden Biden's motive - is a lie practically someone should hang for. USA does not benefit from ukraine stealing nuclear weapons.

the idea CHINA would benefit (Xiden Biden) from a ukraine split - well they probably benefit from any economic destruction which is why they help plan them

What we've learned

China will gladly take USA's money to make bio-weapons that are (perhaps worse) than nuclear weapons. And they are irresponsible little monkeys.

USA scientists "gladly have made bio weapons labs" as well as "animal virus storage facilities" that are next door to the nation's food supply (vast farm land)

UK would gladly develope an ELECTRONIC BIO-WEAPON/VIRUS (UBUNTU) FOR SOME CHINESE FOOD AND SOME CELL PHONES

UN forces cannot inspect Korea like they said they could, and some inspectors were even found to take bribes

Yet the dangers of "bio weapons and electronic deletion weapons" are really growing.

They are ever more in non-secure areas in the hands of hostile countries that don't allow inspection and any agreements they make: ARE FAKE.

We learned that CLEANING UP is much more difficult than THROWING A PARTY.

we learned that cleaning up could be a more complicated proble than that of how

* how to use nuclear for power

* how to use vaccines for curing

* how to use technology for progress

more difficult still is "WHAT TO DO WITH THE FUCKING MESS XIDEN BIDEN TYPES who will betray until there's large wars"

little red riding hood

IS THAT IN 1991 IT WAS COMMON KNOWLEGE UKRAINE HAD RUSSIAN NUCLEAR WEAPONS, HAD BEEN ASKED BY U.N. TO RETURN THEM - AND HAD REFUSED


IT WAS HEALINE NEWS BACK WHEN NEWS WAS ACTUALLY VERIFIED


THAT FAIRFAX VIRGINIA HAS BEEN MAKING FINANCIAL CROSS-DEBT COOKBOOKS WITH UKRAINE (they should hang for)

THAT IF YOU SEE ON THE INTERNET "Ukraine already gave back all the weapons" IT IS MOST PROBABLY A LIE

the only way Russia would have back the "stuff ukraine wanted to steal" is if Russia is in control of Ukraine - which is continually disputable. it may or may not be a lie.

"The Case for a Ukrainian Nuclear Deterrent - Foreign Affairs and Disinformation
https://www.foreignaffairs.com › articles › ukraine › ca...
Conventional wisdom argues that Ukraine should be forced to give up its nuclear weapons to ensure peace and stability in Europe. This is quite wrong."

1) DID RUSSIA ALREADY TAKE THEM BACK. IDK. BUT I KNOW NOT TO BELIEVE THE INTERNET.

2) WRONG? OR QUITE RIGHT? do they deserve a punishment for "stealing someone else's nuclear weapons" ?

3) were all those weapons made in ukraine without russia's help (i seriously doubt it)

4) RE-REMEMBER YOU CAN'T SAY, in today's era of dis-information, if Ukraine is still harboring stolen nuclear Russian weapons and other (stuff)

and if you say stealing nuclear weapons is game USA should play to "hurt china/russia"

THEN YOU FORGET HILLAR BILL CLINTON SOLD URANIUM TO RUSSIA - not stolen (stolen from usa taxpayer given to democrats - which is entirely not russia's fault)

you'd also be FORGETTING that russia has "natural resources" including uranium inside it's borders

Belarus president offers to host Russian nuclear weapons
https://apnews.com › article › russia-ukraine-germany-...
Nov 30, 2021 — Russia annexed Crimea from Ukraine in 2014, a move that the West regards as illegal. Lukashenko made the remarks as he moves to cement ties

Millenials should realize that REAL INFORMATION, sparse as it was, like "ukraine has russian weapons", stopped during Bill Clinton and onward

YOU CAN'T BELIEVE IF THEY DO OR DON'T.

THERE AREN'T HONEST NEWS SOURCES. AND GOOGLE - THEY'D TAKE MONEY $$$$ TO EDIT OUT MISSILE LOCATIONS HIDE IT OFF GOOGLE MAPS. YOU CAN'T GO THAT WAY EITHER REALLY.

when "TED TURNER" pushed "all digital media" into homes - it was ALL DEMOCRAT OWNED and no longer a bearer of truth - like Al Gores "IP BLOCK TRUTHTELLER'S" internet initiative

MILLENIALS DON'T HAVE ANY REAL SOURCE OF NEWS TO TURN TO

AND THAT'S REALLY A 2ND ARGUMENT ADDED TO NON-PROLIFERATION

it's not only hard to clean up the party - one cannot rely on information on if it is cleaned either

but it's NOT like a bathroom clean sheet taped to a public bathroom some nigger faked and didn't clean

PROLIFERATION of nuclear, biological AND ELECTRONIC "kill switch" weapons are really to be prevented. they can cause "large genocides", unihabitable areas (for thousands of years), general terror. and they can "make the worst people rich"

So in the 1990's if you asked a woman, "is Russia going to attack Ukraine", they might say "well, i think independance is really a trend. russia should let them be free if they want freedom."

So in the 1990's if you asked a guy, "is Russia going to attack Ukraine?" He'd say, "they must be really economically hurting if they haven't yet, or waiting for the dust to settle and strategizing before they do". Cold war russia doesn't take no for an answer, especially if you ran off with their weapons.

if you said to the same guy "do you think in 2022 they'd still be disputing the border militarily?", the 1990's man i think would say, "of course not are you stupid? what kind of question is that?"

"European Bishops: Russian Aggression Poses ‘Real Threat’ to World Peace"

IS THAT TRUE?

or is it true cancel culture chinese attack electronics can actually threaten world peace**

and already proven to be used to shut off comminications in countries "china is punishing", BTW

the spying, virus, and kill switches: THOSE ARE ALL PROVEN USED FOR WAR already, and they are no joke

Is EU's ability to lie and change facts in the media THE REAL PROBLEM

another PROBLEM i personally have with this all is:

* fairfax county va, who frequently attacked me personally while "living it up and fucking continually", having debt rings with ukraine - while attacking it's own citizens openly and brazenly

* IT AIN'T THE COLD WAR NO MORE. the Russian pipelines seen in James Bond movies now stretch to Europe. Gorbachev signed documents. Reagan was happy with the new way of doing things.

russia's economy was collaped. it was re-made aimed with economic progressive-ism and not aimed at "killing off USA's military in a continual cold struggle"

IN A COLD WAR BEFORE THAT HAPPENED, you'd say "good, a few countries split from Russia, rest easier they won't attack some silos"

BUT AFTER THAT, i'd say "Russia hasn't been making war with USA lately - this really isn't our business. who is supporting this and WHY. and WHY not dominate afghanistan and iraq if we wanted power and oil.

WHY DO DEMOCRATS PRETEND THEY WANT ARMED TAKE-OVER IN UKRAINE, WHILE RECENTLY LEAVING AFGHANISTAN WITH WEAPONS BEHIND ?

they can't claim they want to keep land they fought for - they continuall give it up and more after that in seedy deals to "sell out citizens for foreign leaders who don't want to pay social security", give away weapons, sell uranium, and more

Flatly I'm calling Xiden Biden a liar.

His objective isn't a military win for Ukraine. He voted to "give Iraq back to the Iraqi and send money to IRAN nuclear program"

a man who does those things - absolutely isn't "in it for the USA". Xiden Biden is in it for himself and is fucking USA

So already stated 1/2 way:

* russia is selling fuel to EU

* EU is going to attack in Ukraine and get lower fuel prices HOW?

* is a richer Ukraine (free of Russian taxes) going to help EU? Or are they just going to be rich fucks who pay a few traitors in EU off?

Richer Ukraine isn't lowering EU's fuel prices.

NONE OF ANYTHING XIDEN BIDEN AND EU AND UK ARE SAYING ADD UP

==============================================

THE CRT RACE CALCULATOR. dead unhappy whites + spending = richer china happier niggers muslims

while Ukraine is topic since 1990's, Xiden Biden being involved, EU being involved is NOT. and nothing they've said ads up to anythign which can be explained

James Bond - The World Is Not Enough

The King oil pipeline was a fictional incomplete oil pipeline constructed by King Industries in the South Caucasus region of Eurasia, running from Baku in Azerbaijan to the Ceyhan oil terminal in Turkey.

New reaches

EXISTING

Russia Wasting Millions of Tonnes of Oil From Leaking Pipes
https://www.newsweek.com › ... › Gazprom
Apr 10, 2015 — Russia's aging and leaking pipelines are wasting millions of tons of oil a year, causing widespread environmental damage that largely ...

I'm so sure. I can smell valdamir burning rusky money from here.

James bond saved (turkey) from a nuclear bomb in a "pig"

https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2019/05/01/russia-says-a-local-firm-deliberately-contaminated-oil-pipeline-a65446

in a more true story, a small company contamited europe's suppy and caused a shutdown by piping in "dirty oil the customers couldn't use"

CHINA

it reaches into russia. not unlike the maps we saw of the rest of europe

MEANWHILE

there isn't any nation not trying to reduce their military cost by selling their old weapons (without the most secret parts) to ANYONE

YOU HAVE TO WORRY XIDEN BIDEN will sell things that normally should NOT be sold (secrets we, the USA, paid in ass killing very literally, to obtain)

I sicken when I think how many "EUROPEAN COMMITTEE STUDIES" there have been on the above. I wish not even to search to know.

5y45u45 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I sicken when I think how many "EUROPEAN COMMITTEE
> STUDIES" there have been on the above. I wish not
> even to search to know.

However: showing a minimal snapshot of the real situations and history ...

WHAT IT DOES IS TELLS YOU DEMOCRAT NARRATIVES IN THE USA - THEY DON'T BEAR ANY REALITY

JOE send in the marines that will show them who is boss