Julio Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> 1. Immigrants take jobs from American workers.
evd
>
> Although immigrants account for 12.5 percent of
> the U.S. population, they make up about 15 percent
> of the workforce. They are overrepresented among
> workers largely because the rest of our population
> is aging: Immigrants and their children have
> accounted for 58 percent of U.S. population growth
> since 1980. This probably won't change anytime
> soon. Low U.S. fertility rates and the upcoming
> retirement of the baby boomers mean that
> immigration is likely to be the only source of
> growth in what we call the "prime age" workforce
> -- workers ages 25 to 55 -- in the decades ahead.
> As record numbers of retirees begin drawing Social
> Security checks, younger immigrant workers will be
> paying taxes, somewhat easing the financial
> pressures on the system.
>
> Moreover, immigrants tend to be concentrated in
> high- and low-skilled occupations that complement
> -- rather than compete with -- jobs held by native
> workers. And the foreign-born workers who fill
> lower-paying jobs are typically
> first-hired/first-fired employees, allowing
> employers to expand and contract their workforces
> rapidly. As a result, immigrants experience higher
> employment than natives during booms -- but they
> suffer higher job losses during downturns,
> including the current one.
>
> It's true that an influx of new workers pushes
> wages down, but immigration also stimulates growth
> by creating new consumers, entrepreneurs and
> investors. As a result of this growth, economists
> estimate that wages for the vast majority of
> American workers are slightly higher than they
> would be without immigration. U.S. workers without
> a high school degree experience wage declines as a
> result of competition from immigrants, but these
> losses are modest, at just over 1 percent.
> Economists also estimate that for each job an
> immigrant fills, an additional job is created.
>
> 2. Immigration is at an all-time high, and most
> new immigrants came illegally.
>
>
> The historic high came more than a century ago, in
> 1890, when immigrants made up 14.8 percent of our
> population. Today, about two-thirds of immigrants
> are here legally, either as naturalized citizens
> or as lawful permanent residents, more commonly
> known as "green card" holders. And of the
> approximately 10.8 million immigrants who are in
> the country illegally, about 40 percent arrived
> legally but overstayed their visas.
>
> It's worth noting that although the unauthorized
> immigrant population includes more people from
> Mexico than from any other country, Mexicans are
> also the largest group of lawful immigrants. As
> for the flow of illegal immigrants, apprehensions
> along the U.S.-Mexico border have declined by more
> than 50 percent over the past four years, while
> increases in the size of the illegal population,
> which had been growing by about 500,000 a year for
> more than a decade, have stopped. This decline is
> largely due to the recession, but stepped-up
> border enforcement is playing a part.
>
> 3. Today's immigrants are not integrating into
> American life like past waves did.
>
>
> The integration of immigrants remains a hallmark
> of America's vitality as a society and a source of
> admiration abroad, as it has been throughout our
> history. Although some people complain that
> today's immigrants are not integrating into U.S.
> society as quickly as previous newcomers did, the
> same charge was leveled at virtually every past
> wave of immigrants, including the large numbers of
> Germans, Irish and Italians who arrived in the
> 19th and early 20th centuries.
>
> Today, as before, immigrant integration takes a
> generation or two. Learning English is one key
> driver of this process; the education and upward
> mobility of immigrants' children is the other. On
> the first count, today's immigrants consistently
> seek English instruction in such large numbers
> that adult-education programs cannot meet the
> demand, especially in places such as California.
> On the second count, the No Child Left Behind Act
> has played a critical role in helping educate
> immigrant children because it holds schools newly
> accountable for teaching them English.
>
> However, the unauthorized status of millions of
> foreign-born immigrants can slow integration in
> crucial ways. For example, illegal immigrants are
> ineligible for in-state tuition at most public
> colleges and universities, putting higher
> education effectively out of their reach. And laws
> prohibiting unauthorized immigrants from getting
> driver's licenses or various professional
> credentials can leave them stuck in jobs with a
> high density of other immigrants and unable to
> advance.
>
> 4. Cracking down on illegal border crossings will
> make us safer.
>
>
> The job of protecting the nation's borders is
> immense, encompassing nearly 7,500 miles of land
> borders, 12,380 miles of coastline and a vast
> network of sea ports, international airports,
> ports of entry along the Mexican and Canadian
> borders and visa-issuing consulates abroad.
>
> Since Sept. 11, 2001, we have dramatically
> strengthened our borders through the use of
> biometrics at ports of entry, secure
> cargo-shipment systems, intelligence gathering,
> integrated databases and increased international
> cooperation. The Border Patrol has nearly doubled
> in size in the past five years, to more than
> 20,000 agents. The Department of Homeland Security
> says it is on schedule to meet congressional
> mandates for southwestern border enforcement,
> including fence-building. And cooperation with the
> Mexican government has improved significantly.
>
> Still, our southwest border is more a classic law
> enforcement challenge than a front line in the war
> on terrorism. Antiterrorism measures rely heavily
> on intelligence gathering and clandestine efforts
> that are unrelated to border enforcement.
>
> The seasoned enforcement officials I have spoken
> with all contend that if we provided enough visas
> to meet the economy's demand for workers, border
> agents would be freed to focus on protecting the
> nation from truly dangerous individuals and
> activities, such as drug-trafficking, smuggling
> and cartel violence.
>
> 5. Immigration reform cannot happen in an election
> year.
>
>
> The politics of immigration can be explosive and
> can chase lawmakers away, especially as elections
> near, with the result that Congress infrequently
> and reluctantly updates immigration laws. However,
> all the significant immigration bills enacted in
> recent decades were passed in election years,
> often at the last minute and after fractious
> debates.
>
> This list dates back to the Refugee Act of 1980,
> which established our system for humanitarian
> protection and refugee and asylum admissions. Next
> came the Immigration Reform and Control Act of
> 1986, which made it illegal to hire unauthorized
> immigrants and provided amnesty for 2.7 million
> illegal immigrants. The Immigration Act of 1990
> increased the number of visas allotted to highly
> skilled workers. And the 1996 Illegal Immigration
> Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act charged
> immigration agencies with implementing significant
> new law enforcement mandates.
>
> Legislative attempts to make urgently needed
> changes fizzled in the House in 2005 and in the
> Senate in 2006 and 2007, and the to-do list for
> this Congress is substantial. But ruling out
> immigration reform, whether because Congress has
> other priorities or because it's an election year,
> would be a mistake. The outline for immigration
> legislation that Sen. Charles Schumer (N.Y.) and
> his Democratic colleagues unveiled last week,
> together with the uproar over the Arizona law, may
> help convince lawmakers that there's no time like
> the present.
>
>
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/artic
> le/2010/04/30/AR2010043001106.html
This whole article is a myth/Lie perpetuated by liberal bullshitters at the Washington ComPost