Clinton/Obama schooling has done nothing but teach future "law" students to cheat and indirectly kill, not even having the nerve to admit law kills. It's a worse case scenario.

the only time ACLU sued Obama admin. was to SPEED UP OPEN BORDERS

correction: and to inhibit the progress of US military weapons

https://epic.org/amicus/fisa/215/klayman/

LET ME FINISH READING IT FOR YOU QUICLY before it takes you a month ...

During Bush, NSA, Mil, et all were given military wartime powers to "spy" on FOREIGN COUNTRIES from within USA - meaning foreign countries had (has) military agents in USA (a matter thoroughly proven and unquestionable).

Obama used these "wartime powers to survey foreign military" to spy on the American public - making your cable tv box and street light insidious tools - that not only would local police spy on telephone calls but the data could also BE SOLD TO THIRD PARTIES, excusing Google et al (and china), of doing the same.

ACLU (during Obama) and Democrats filed endless frivolous suits directed to deflect blame upon the NSA, WHO CANNOT BE PROSECUTED, rather than Obama. But Obama had several suits against him for using Bush's wartime authority for spying on US Citizens and "lending that to NSA, police, and third parties". What ACLU did was to support Obama by submitting a horrific number of lawsuits to obstruct the justice system.

During this, Senator Feinstein introduced Bills to Broaded Obama surveylancing and, famously, "THE MEMO" was part of the FISA leg of those bills.

During all of the above, corrupt county courthouses ARE STILL USING CONVERSATIONS RECORDED on phones, by cable TV boxes, and by cell phones that "were thought to be off" when actually the police were recording.

WHY WHY WHY is any of that a problem?

Because when corrupt local and democrat governments get power to spy they

#1 aren't likely to ever give it up

#2 will use it politically (already it was used upon Trump campaign to "gather intelligence and or dirt" on Trump's campaign against Hillary - and gov employees caught had been recorded saying that exactly was the purpose - to keep Trump out of office)

#3 people would be arrested for what they were talking about that they hadn't done. US law doesnt' allow that except in the case of planning armed bank robbery

So we've had ENDLESS cases of people being imprisoned merely for what they've said during PRIVATE CONVERSATIONS.

What we don't realize, is that in a CORRUPT COUNTY LIKE FAIRFAX VIRGINIA, we've had ENDLESS cases of people being politically targeted for what they say on the phone by, say, sharon bulova's DC implants and illegal aliens who are running those hidden ops for ("her police") We don't even know how to prosecute these cases - it would be impossible.

The only "fair hands" of this terrible technology is THE USA MILITARY (and nsa iff us miliitary requests it).

The US military police is to kill 3rd parties who try to access it's intelligence, and is to allowed to attack citizens on foot or in court (excepting for protecting the US borders).

The US Military's goal is to protect the USA not to prosecute white californians for disagreeing which Pelosi's hispanic policies and get them fired.

The US Military's goal isn't to listen for drug deals on cell phones that never really turn off. They have no time or funding for that.

But President Bush gave the powers of "terrible technology" to the Military: to Obama and county governments for spying on citizens

: not to obama not to county gov

which brings now to HIGHLIGHT

if Edward Snowden, who released NSA broadened surveylance data to foreign governments,

if Edward Snowen was an Obama BLM'er employee sympathist

(it was democrats who vastly abused 3rd party getting data, not republicans who said it was to be used for war matters ONLY)

Meanwhile, Bill Clinton stopping every USA effort to get security in software (by releasing the blue screen of death and Windows 95 which HELPED china break into gov computers more than it hindered it - HELPED spying upon USA), Bill Clinton deleted people who protested what they were up to and doing - and Hillary State dept. funded punching holes in Linux security that were very wide indeed - killing the system for commercial use except in the hands of ASIANS and democrat controlled google.

little red riding hood

https://epic.org/amicus/fisa/215/klayman/

NSA was ordered to cease "bulk recording", HOWEVER TELEPHONE COMPANIES WERE NOT SO ORDERED, which means, the US Citizens are fucked again: they paid millions and millions more for lawsuits and ended up with a ruling that was dead on arrival and didn't protect them from government

ACLU sues government over social media surveillance ...www.sfchronicle.com › nation › article › ACLU-sues-g...
Jan 17, 2019 - ... and privacy concerns,” the ACLU said in its U.S. District Court lawsuit. ... data is far worse than the Obama administration has acknowledged.

HOWEVER - this would be dead on arrival because social media is OPEN TO THE PUBLIC (thus, everyone can see it) and also RUN BY DEMOCRATS grant funded "company"/agency ALMOST EXCLUSIVELY - literally blocking Trumpers and promotiing the democrat party as i speak.

Also it's demcorats who have stalked, fired, and imprisoned EVEN SCHOOL CHILDREN (cases in California, pelosi territory) for what they "clicked like on", not republicans. So this doubles the "fraud factor" of this aclu "lawsuit"

The lawsuit is an amazing fraud which is allowing some political rich family child to pass though lawschool using a fraudulent lawsuit assigned to him/her by Democrats as a sign of loyalty to democrats in exchange for later gov job as a democrat leaning lawyer who will cheat and steal for the democrat party in the future.

'See You in Court': ACLU Files Nearly 400 Cases Versus Trumpwww.usnews.com › Political News › News › Home
6 hours ago - As of this week, the American Civil Liberties Union has filed nearly 400 lawsuits and other legal actions against President Donald Trump's ...

https://www.breitbart.com/news/see-you-in-court-aclu-files-nearly-400-cases-versus-trump/

https://www.usnews.com/news/politics/articles/2020-08-06/see-you-in-court-aclu-files-nearly-400-cases-versus-trump

the ACLU had only a few lawsuits against Obama: they were to widen illegal immigration of hispanics and muslims

it was the ACLU at fault for the failure of "flight security at airports", who literally strip searched old white grandmothers and FAMOUSLY - FORBID SEARCHING OF MUSLIMS - GRANTING A POSSIBLE TERRORIST an $250,000,000 for being searched - which in itself is financial terrorism against the USA perpetrated BY DEMOCRATS

https://abc7.com/aclu-george-floyd-sues-la-lawsuit/6230885/

!!!! ACLU sues LA, San Bernardino over 'draconian' curfews !!!!

THE BLM LOOTING CURFEWS.

LEGALLY SPEAKING - THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A "NIGHT TIME PROTEST", AND THOSE LITTLE ASSHOLES KNOW IT

ACLU is mostly foreign fuckers in USA and BLMers using Hillary State Dept money to attack USA and DO LEGAL CRIMES SO CORRUPT AREAS WILL LATER HIRE THEM

"Clinton/Obama schooling has done nothing but teach future "law" students to cheat and indirectly kill, not even having the nerve to admit law kills. It's a worse case scenario."

that ACLU case about drones killing USA citizens? A lie.

that was instituted by dianne feinstein who was SPYING ON THE US MILITARY

she's using ACLU to "investigate and demand documentation" of a NEW US WEAPON which was activated IN A WAR ZONE

wasn't even a "USA" case, but ACLU somehow got in it, suing "Obama", who was "willing to co-operate with the lawsuits", giving more information about it than he was legally allowed ?!

but this was all to advertise they whitey had a new weapon and obama was willing to transfer the plans to foreign players ... in my opinion

ok all of iraq is "a usa citizen" when ACLU is doing the counting !!! every illegal alien in USA is also a "us citizen". all lies.

in the past, missile technology was protected, NOT EXPOSED, from spies in the usa (ie, aclu)

a drone is exactly that

https://www.aclu.org

ACLU is "currently a profit based organ of the democrat party with HQ in NYC"

in it's founding it was nothing of the kind (and note already, at it's founding, there were MANY legal organizations (the bar association the largest)).

also note: one of it's founders was DODGING THE DRAFT and a member of a foreign military (a communist), if Helen had eyes she would have known that

the organization ONLY LATER became funded by foreign powers to Shield illegal aliens from usa prosecution (even during wartime): but in it's founding, the organization was NOT FOUNDED for the purpose of Shielding illegal immigrants at all

d

d

d

they are a federally funded school organization

political use is ilelgal and being law suits they should show respect for law