Re: “The serious state crimes by Donald Trump and his enterprises that Cyrus Vance has indicated he is pursuing as Manhattan DA cannot be shielded from prosecution by any invocation of presidential immunity, nor are they beyond the reach of prosecution an
Posted by:
TYL7U
()
Date: August 04, 2020 01:54PM
Perry Mason would be jealous Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> EJTXE Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > ur a real legal beagle homer Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > This certainly can be "shielded" from
> > prosecution
> > > by presidential immunity. All Trump's
> lawyers
> > > have to do is kick this to a federal court,
> > which
> > > is his right to try and do. If the federal
> > court
> > > takes it up, any ruling supersedes any state
> > > ruling. A lowly federal district judge can
> > > overrule an unanimous state supreme court
> > ruling
> > > and only a federal appeals court of SCOTUS
> can
> > > overturn it. There's nothing a state court
> can
> > do
> > > about it. Sucks to know that don't it?
> > >
> > > And the best part is, anything Vance does can
> > be
> > > fought in the NY courts, which will take a
> > couple
> > > of years to make it up to the SCONY. Then,
> > after
> > > there's that ruling, Trump's lawyers can
> start
> > the
> > > federal court route.
> > >
> > > In their recent ruling, SCOTUS didn't provide
> > > Trump with unlimited immunity, but said in
> both
> > > the federal case (congressional dems v
> Treasury
> > > Sec) and the state case (NY v Trump Org) that
> > they
> > > need to go back and start over with the new
> > > clarification.
> > >
> > > Years! lol
> >
> >
> > You're gloating that the crook in the
> Whitehouse
> > can get away with it. And you think you're for
> > law and order. Just the kind of law and order
> > that arrests black people, I guess.
> >
> > And you're wrong about "presidential immunity".
>
> > The only presidential immunity is the Justice
> > Department's policy that says that they won't
> > indict a sitting president. And you can't
> "kick"
> > a state prosecution to a federal court. Not
> > possible. You're wrong. Doesn't work that way.
>
> > Wrong.
>
>
> All Trump's lawyers have to argue is that this is
> a nuance lawsuit based on Trump's position as
> president. Bam! Into Federal Courts it goes.
> You're wrong. That's the way it works. Wrong.
A criminal prosecution is not a civil lawsuit, dumbfuck. And even if it was, you don't get to remove a state lawsuit, which this is not anyway, to federal court because it's a "nuance" suit (you meant nuisance). You don't know what the fuck you're talking about.