Looking good to me!

Air brushing can do wonders for even the most recognizably ugly face in the world.

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University

that mouth looks photoshopped on the bottom pic

Put on the glasses, man!
Attachments:

pgens Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Looking good to me!
>
> http://media.washingtonexaminer.com/images/250*344
> /042910_capfilecover.jpg




While the magazine photo is obviously airbrushed, I'm sure she looked really good about 15-years ago. Today, she's not ugly, just a little skeletal looking.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/28/2010 07:30PM by eesh.

Keep in mind that the woman is 70 years old. Most women I think would be thrilled to look as good as she does at that age.

eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> pgens Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Looking good to me!
> >
> >
> http://media.washingtonexaminer.com/images/250*344
>
> > /042910_capfilecover.jpg
>
>
>
>
> While the magazine photo is obviously airbrushed,
> I'm sure she looked really good about 15-years
> ago. Today, she's not ugly, just a little skeletal
> looking.

Airbrushed? Looks like they wheeled that bitch through Maaco....

Voter___ Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Keep in mind that the woman is 70 years old. Most
> women I think would be thrilled to look as good as
> she does at that age.

Yup, that is what I am saying.

eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> pgens Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Looking good to me!
> >
> >
> http://media.washingtonexaminer.com/images/250*344
>
> > /042910_capfilecover.jpg
>
>
>
>
> While the magazine photo is obviously airbrushed,
> I'm sure she looked really good about 15-years
> ago. Today, she's not ugly, just a little skeletal
> looking.


It's her personality that would make her ugly regardless of aging.

==================================================================================================
"And if any women or children get their legs torn off, or faces caved in, well, it's tough shit for them." -2LT. Bert Stiles, 505th, 339th (On Berlin Bombardier Mission, 1944).

in that first pic i wouldnt even call it airbrushing. that is straight up facial reconstruction using some kind of software. the forehead is different if you compare the pics. i didnt think airbrushing would change your facial features. airbrushing would also not get rid of that ballsack skin for a neck either. something here is fishy and its not just her snatch.

Dripping plastic bag tortured grin

pgens Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Voter___ Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Keep in mind that the woman is 70 years old.
> Most
> > women I think would be thrilled to look as good
> as
> > she does at that age.
>
> Yup, that is what I am saying.

True, but most 70-year-olds are also not multi-millionaires, unlike Nancy, so they can't afford the quality of 'work' she has had done.

In contrast, some of them are worried that the price of cat food will go up and they will have to go hungry one night a week.

eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> pgens Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Looking good to me!
> >
> >
> http://media.washingtonexaminer.com/images/250*344
>
> > /042910_capfilecover.jpg
>
>
>
>
> While the magazine photo is obviously airbrushed,
> I'm sure she looked really good about 15-years
> ago. Today, she's not ugly, just a little skeletal
> looking.

You would have to go back a lot longer than 15 years. Here she
is in one of her transitory stages.

http://tinyurl.com/yjcb5dg