http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/political-media/palin-mangles-obamas-quotes-to-paint-him-as-america-hater/

Sarah Palin Mangles Obama’s Quotes To Paint Him As America-Hater

We should probably resign ourselves to the fact that every utterance Sarah Palin makes is widely going to be treated as news until she declares she isn’t running for president. And quite possibly beyond. So all we can do is try to fact-check what she says and hope others do the same.

The latest: In a new Facebook missive, Palin butchered Obama’s quotes at the nuke summit in a strikingly dishonest (even for her) way, tearing them out of context to suggest he’s uncomfortable wielding American power and is hostile towards American exceptionalism:

Mr. President, is a strong America a problem?

Asked this week about his faltering efforts to advance the Middle East peace process, President Obama did something remarkable. In front of some 47 foreign leaders and hundreds of reporters from all over the world, President Obama said that “whether we like it or not, we remain a dominant military superpower.”

Whether we like it or not? Most Americans do like it.

Here’s what the President actually said:

But what we can make sure of is, is that we are constantly present, constantly engaged, and setting out very clearly to both sides our belief that not only is it in the interests of each party to resolve these conflicts but it’s also in the interest of the United States. It is a vital national security interest of the United States to reduce these conflicts because whether we like it or not, we remain a dominant military superpower, and when conflicts break out, one way or another we get pulled into them. And that ends up costing us significantly in terms of both blood and treasure.

As you can see, Palin and her team of ghostwriters plucked Obama’s remark out of context to quote him saying “whether we like it or not,” we are a superpower. In reality, he was saying that “whether we like it or not,” we get pulled into international conflicts that cost us American lives — so it’s in our security interests to resolve them.

Since everything Palin says in her tightly-controlled media environment will be treated as news for the next two years and beyond, all we can hope for is that those lavishing attention on what she says inject a bit of context and reality into the discussion.

Tough shit. Get used to it. Sarah RULES!!!

FUNdamental Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ...all we can hope for is that those lavishing
> attention on what she says inject a bit of context
> and reality into the discussion.

I hope to win the lottery, and frankly, I think my pipe dream is more feasable.

--------------------------------------------------------------
13 4826 0948 82695 25847. Yes.

We've seen Sarah Palin's like before...



---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

News Flash:

PALIN IS RATHUR IRRELUVANT THEASE DAYZ.







My question is: Why do YOU give a fuck about HER pathetic PR fail?

Actually, it would appear that the Obama speechwriters have a reading comp problem and it appears FUNdamental does as well (he's probably a product of the FCPS and NOT smarter than a 5th grader).

If Obama, did indeed, and I am not saying he didn't mean to say “whether we like it or not,” we get pulled into international conflicts that cost us American lives — so it’s in our security interests to resolve them," the statement was poorly written/delivered to convey that message.

A fifth grader in the FCPS could probably come up with a sentence that read:


But what we can make sure of is, is that we are constantly present, constantly engaged, and setting out very clearly to both sides our belief that not only is it in the interests of each party to resolve these conflicts but it’s also in the interest of the United States. It is a vital national security interest of the United States to reduce these conflicts because we remain a dominant military superpower, and when conflicts break out, one way or another we get pulled into them whether we like it or not. And that ends up costing us significantly in terms of both blood and treasure.

Washingtone-Locian,

I did not know you were a CLOSET FAGGOT.


Anita Bryant was cool and does NOT fight the cause anymore, but tell me WTL, WHO THE FUCK WANTS OPENLY GAY PEOPLE TEACHING IN OUR GOD DAMNED PUBLIC SCHOOLS ANYWAYS?

Bad Example Jockey Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Washingtone-Locian,
>
> I did not know you were a CLOSET FAGGOT.
>
>
> Anita Bryant was cool and does NOT fight the cause
> anymore, but tell me WTL, WHO THE FUCK WANTS
> OPENLY GAY PEOPLE TEACHING IN OUR GOD DAMNED
> PUBLIC SCHOOLS ANYWAYS?


You should ask the Catholic Church how well it's worked out with closeted gays teaching in their schools.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Bad Example Jockey Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Washingtone-Locian,
> >
> > I did not know you were a CLOSET FAGGOT.
> >
> >
> > Anita Bryant was cool and does NOT fight the
> cause
> > anymore, but tell me WTL, WHO THE FUCK WANTS
> > OPENLY GAY PEOPLE TEACHING IN OUR GOD DAMNED
> > PUBLIC SCHOOLS ANYWAYS?
>
>
> You should ask the Catholic Church how well it's
> worked out with closeted gays teaching in their
> schools.

Probably as well as all the gay pedos arrested in public schools. The Catholic schools seem to have less of the sit going on that the public shit system in this country.

I hope Palin does win an election, 'cause it'll be the end of America..

Then maybe you should pull your kids out of Catholic Private School, eh WTL?

Idea Comerupwither Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Then maybe you should pull your kids out of
> Catholic Private School, eh WTL?


My kids don't go to private school. As for openly gay teachers, I could care less as long as they don't pull the same shit as their heterosexual counterparts.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

That's just the thing, thier 'heterosexual counterparts', are not doing the 'shit' they are.

*Shit-Kicker* Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> News Flash:
>
> PALIN IS RATHUR IRRELUVANT THEASE DAYZ.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> My question is: Why do YOU give a fuck about HER
> pathetic PR fail?

If she's so irrelevant then why are there so many replies on this thread?
:)

Nail-ON-the-HEADbot Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> That's just the thing, thier 'heterosexual
> counterparts', are not doing the 'shit' they are.


No. It's worse...

http://www.hottforteacher.com/

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

MrMephisto Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> FUNdamental Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > ...all we can hope for is that those lavishing
> > attention on what she says inject a bit of
> context
> > and reality into the discussion.
>
> I hope to win the lottery, and frankly, I think my
> pipe dream is more feasable.

What I am amazed at, is all the people on here that hate Sarah palin and yet lavish attention on everything she says. Obsess much there FUNdy?

+1 MM

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University

Registered Voter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> MrMephisto Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > FUNdamental Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > ...all we can hope for is that those
> lavishing
> > > attention on what she says inject a bit of
> > context
> > > and reality into the discussion.
> >
> > I hope to win the lottery, and frankly, I think
> my
> > pipe dream is more feasable.
>
> What I am amazed at, is all the people on here
> that hate Sarah palin and yet lavish attention on
> everything she says. Obsess much there FUNdy?
>
> +1 MM

Actually, the part I quoted from Mr. Damental was from the same article lambasting her for taking "HUSSEIN" Obama's quote out of context.

It's not that I hate Sarah Palin. She's stupid, useless, and the only reason she's still relevant is because sex still sells. If the GOP wants to use her as some sort of mascot, great. If Fox "News" wants to put another bimbo pundit on TV, whatever.

What I hate is how dumb people take what she says as gospel, and think she's some sort of visionary. She's the stereotype of "Pretty Girl Everyone Said Was Smart Because She's Pretty." If people would bother to put their blinders away and note the complete lack of substance beneath her skin, I'm sure public opinion would be much different.

--------------------------------------------------------------
13 4826 0948 82695 25847. Yes.

Whatever happened to Meghan Mccain? She was trying that sex sells/no substance/visionary bit for a while.

This is typical though - the problem that "elites" don't like is she is pretty much a typical, average low-to-middle income American. Populists appeal to the American people from time to time, especially when you get folks in office who, no matter how smart they are, act as if the American people don't exist in domestic issues.

We got Reagan because of Carter, Bush because of Clinton, etc. Many times these folks are much smarter then they are perceived. In Palin's case she is pretty much as dumb as she lets on. There will be plenty of other candidates by the time the 2012 elections are held. Just look at what happened to Hillary for example.

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University

Sarah Palin is the only presidential candidate that is from outside Washington. If don't agree with Washington politics as usual then you have to vote for Palin.

The Tea Party is growing larger and larger every month and will be running candidates in all the November elections!

Mephisto wrote:
--------------------------------
>If people would bother to put their blinders away and note the complete lack of

>substance beneath her skin,"

That's NOT substance, those are scales! I knew it, Sarah Palin is a
Reptilian Humanoid Shapeshifter!



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/19/2010 01:30PM by Troll@AOL.

Tea Party Fan Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Sarah Palin is the only presidential candidate
> that is from outside Washington.

So were Bill Clinton when he got elected in 1992 and Jimmy Carter when he got elected in 1976.

> If don't agree
> with Washington politics as usual then you have to
> vote for Palin.
>

Actually, it's the candidates that understand how "politics as usual" works that do the best job as President. Jimmy Carter came in with this attitude that he wasn't going to play those Washington games, and it sank his Presidency.


> The Tea Party is growing larger and larger every
> month and will be running candidates in all the
> November elections!

Wishful thinking. The movement will grow just enough to split the vote withe GOP and insure the Dems maintain control of Congress. Nice thought, though.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

Tea Party Fan Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Sarah Palin is the only presidential candidate
> that is from outside Washington. If don't agree
> with Washington politics as usual then you have to
> vote for Palin.
>
> The Tea Party is growing larger and larger every
> month and will be running candidates in all the
> November elections!

And if your grammar suck balls like this, then you HAVE TO vote for Palin.

Syphilis Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> And if your grammar suck balls like this, then you
> HAVE TO vote for Palin.


"grammar suck balls"

Grammar FAIL. Insult FAIL. Overall FAIL.

grammar fail Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Syphilis Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > And if your grammar suck balls like this, then
> you
> > HAVE TO vote for Palin.
>
>
> "grammar suck balls"
>
> Grammar FAIL. Insult FAIL. Overall FAIL.

Guess I'm voting for Palin then..

Registered Voter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> This is typical though - the problem that "elites"
> don't like is she is pretty much a typical,
> average low-to-middle income American.

I don't... She...

Yes. That's exactly what us elites don't like about her. Damn her proletariat appeal, what with her book deals, presidential campaigns, national exposure on television, paid appearances, public relations team, stylists, private jet, and half-a-million dollar house that she's not in danger of foreclosing on.

--------------------------------------------------------------
13 4826 0948 82695 25847. Yes.

MrMephisto Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Registered Voter Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > This is typical though - the problem that
> "elites"
> > don't like is she is pretty much a typical,
> > average low-to-middle income American.
>
> I don't... She...
>
> Yes. That's exactly what us elites don't like
> about her. Damn her proletariat appeal, what with
> her book deals, presidential campaigns, national
> exposure on television, paid appearances, public
> relations team, stylists, private jet, and
> half-a-million dollar house that she's not in
> danger of foreclosing on.

Last time I checked MM - you were NOT an elite.

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/19/2010 03:55PM by Registered Voter.

The sad part of her taking what he said out of context is that it is now considered gospel and the other conservative leaders will use this quote forever and ever as the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

FUNdamental Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

>
> The latest: In a new Facebook missive, Palin
> "butchered Obama’s quotes"

Hardly - butchered? Give me a break.

> President Obama said that
> “whether we like it or not, we remain a dominant
> military superpower.”
>

Versus this:

>
> But what we can make sure of is, is that we
> are constantly present, constantly engaged, and
> setting out very clearly to both sides our belief
> that not only is it in the interests of each party
> to resolve these conflicts but it’s also in the
> interest of the United States. It is a vital
> national security interest of the United States to
> reduce these conflicts because whether we like it
> or not, we remain a dominant military superpower,
> and when conflicts break out, one way or another
> we get pulled into them. And that ends up costing
> us significantly in terms of both blood and
> treasure.

I don't see how the meaning changes that drastically even when taken out of context. In and out of context it portrays the same issue - we are a military superpower (for now) and like it or not, that gives us certain responsibilities. As a matter of fact, taken in context, it almost sounds worse - as if he is arguing that it would be in our best interest to NOT be a superpower so we wouldn't be drawn into these issues. In either case, the context to me is clear:

We are a dominant military superpower, and there are people that do and don't like that. Both internally and externally. It isn't truly clear whether he thinks it is a good thing or not.

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University

That quote that Palin used was not mis-quoted by her, but it was rather mis-spoken by Obama (At least I most certainly hope so).

==================================================================================================
"And if any women or children get their legs torn off, or faces caved in, well, it's tough shit for them." -2LT. Bert Stiles, 505th, 339th (On Berlin Bombardier Mission, 1944).



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 04/19/2010 07:06PM by ThePackLeader.

Registered Voter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I don't see how the meaning changes that
> drastically even when taken out of context.

Oh, please. This is the same argument liberals use against the 2nd Amendment. "It's only for state-sponsored militias, not for the common man. See, look at where the commas are placed."

ThePackLeader Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> That quote that Palin used was not mis-quoted by
> her, but it was rather mis-spoken by Obama (At
> least I most certainly hope so).

Again, it can only be taken out of context if the reader wants it to be taken out of context.

--------------------------------------------------------------
13 4826 0948 82695 25847. Yes.

This is just the normal misrepresentation of democratic policies that the republican party has always done. They are liars....as RV is a liar! The reason they do it is because its a sucessful technique..if you tell a lie loud enough and long enough people will begin to beleive it..and that is all the Republican Part is interested in. They are masters at getting people to vote against their vested interests.

Registered Voter...a Big talking coward..big man on FFXU...little man in life.

MrMephisto Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Registered Voter Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I don't see how the meaning changes that
> > drastically even when taken out of context.
>
> Oh, please. This is the same argument liberals
> use against the 2nd Amendment. "It's only for
> state-sponsored militias, not for the common man.
> See, look at where the commas are placed."
>
> ThePackLeader Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > That quote that Palin used was not mis-quoted
> by
> > her, but it was rather mis-spoken by Obama (At
> > least I most certainly hope so).
>
> Again, it can only be taken out of context if the
> reader wants it to be taken out of context.

The argument is that it was "horribly mangled" - I call BS. Slight meaning change - sure - but it is not a gross misrepresentation of what he was saying or implying.

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University

Vince(1) Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> This is just the normal misrepresentation of
> democratic policies that the republican party has
> always done. They are liars....as RV is a liar!
> The reason they do it is because its a sucessful
> technique..if you tell a lie loud enough and long
> enough people will begin to beleive it..and that
> is all the Republican Part is interested in. They
> are masters at getting people to vote against
> their vested interests.

Quiet. Adults are speaking.

Registered Voter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The argument is that it was "horribly mangled" - I
> call BS. Slight meaning change - sure - but it is
> not a gross misrepresentation of what he was
> saying or implying.

"Horribly mangled," "slight meaning change..." Whatever you want to call it, the point is: He said one thing, and people that disagree with him are taking it a different way. If presented with the original speech, void of all spin, I would take it as, "We get dragged into these conflicts because we are one of the few countries able to deal with them."

You're not a stupid person, RV, and you'll do more credit to your position if you don't buy into the rhetoric.

--------------------------------------------------------------
13 4826 0948 82695 25847. Yes.

MrMephisto Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> You're not a stupid person, RV, and you'll do more
> credit to your position if you don't buy into the
> rhetoric.

Was I the OP Meph? I didn't post the topic - I merely took issue with the overhype on the meaning change. I have seen stories that other people have used where they not only took what someone said and added a word that TOTALLY changed the meaning of what was said, yes the MSM ran with the quote as if that was exactly what they did say. So in this case, the only reason it is being "overhyped" is because it is close enough to the truth that they have to attack Palin (yet again - like it never stops) to make sure it is dismissed as nonsensical.

I am not buying into any rhetoric - on either side of the issue. There are much more glaring examples of taking quotes out of context that are truly worth getting upset over. This case was BS.

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/19/2010 11:58PM by Registered Voter.

Registered Voter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> MrMephisto Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >
> > You're not a stupid person, RV, and you'll do
> more
> > credit to your position if you don't buy into
> the
> > rhetoric.
>
> Was I the OP Meph? I didn't post the topic - I
> merely took issue with the overhype on the meaning
> change. I have seen stories that other people have
> used where they not only took what someone said
> and added a word that TOTALLY changed the meaning
> of what was said, yes the MSM ran with the quote
> as if that was exactly what they did say. So in
> this case, the only reason it is being "overhyped"
> is because it is close enough to the truth that
> they have to attack Palin (yet again - like it
> never stops) to make sure it is dismissed as
> nonsensical.
>
> I am not buying into any rhetoric - on either side
> of the issue. There are much more glaring examples
> of taking quotes out of context that are truly
> worth getting upset over. This case was BS.


Very clever lies..."close to the truth". The truth is you are a mother fucking mouth piece of the republican party...you eat ass!

Registered Voter...a Big talking coward..big man on FFXU...little man in life.

Vince(1) Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Very clever lies..."close to the truth". The
> truth is you are a mother fucking mouth piece of
> the republican party...you eat ass!

And you act like a fucking child. Here, I'll show you how to disagree with someone while still acting like an adult.

Registered Voter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I am not buying into any rhetoric - on either side
> of the issue. There are much more glaring examples
> of taking quotes out of context that are truly
> worth getting upset over. This case was BS.

It is not BS. Maybe Greg Sargent sensationalized it a bit, but that's because he's a blogger for a website. He never claims to be part of a "fair and balanced" "news" organization. Either way, it's still nothing compared to the hype Fox News puts on trivial shit Obama does. The same Fox News that, coincidentally, Sarah Palin works for. The same Fox News that has some fat, pasty white guy (pick one) reminding us that Obama is taking us into some sort of communist-socialism.

It is not BS, because Sarah Palin is, whether we like it or not, a leader. We should expect our leaders to be honest and truthful, and not distort the truth to fit into what they think should be reality. She distorted the truth of what Obama said, and that shouldn't be tolerated by Democrats and Republicans alike.

That is the very reason I initially supported the Iraq war, but turned against it when the WMD angle was exposed as bullshit.

Call me next time WashingTone-Locian starts defending a prominent Democrat/liberal for taking something a Republican said out of context to further their agenda, and I'll say the same thing.

--------------------------------------------------------------
13 4826 0948 82695 25847. Yes.

Palin is a joke..she's not even a politician,just another entertainer..
...she can't answer any questions without it being pre-screened or it been written for her...women with low esteem want to be her, and fat,old white men fantasize about her..if she was a minority or looked like
Janet Reno,we wouldn't hear a thing about a her..populist? hardly..she's a fake and fraud, and milking it for all its worth....she reminds me of those televangelists
keep sending her your hard earned $$ folks..

Brit_mixed Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Palin is a joke..she's not even a politician,just
> another entertainer..
> ...she can't answer any questions without it being
> pre-screened or it been written for her...women
> with low esteem want to be her, and fat,old white
> men fantasize about her..if she was a minority or
> looked like
> Janet Reno,we wouldn't hear a thing about a
> her..populist? hardly..she's a fake and fraud, and
> milking it for all its worth....she reminds me of
> those televangelists
> keep sending her your hard earned $$ folks..



Hey mate on another note are you voting? apparently they send out voting cards 4 days before the election? any pointers? first year abroad, cheers

MrMephisto Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Vince(1) Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Very clever lies..."close to the truth". The
> > truth is you are a mother fucking mouth piece
> of
> > the republican party...you eat ass!
>
> And you act like a fucking child. Here, I'll show
> you how to disagree with someone while still
> acting like an adult.
>
> Registered Voter Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I am not buying into any rhetoric - on either
> side
> > of the issue. There are much more glaring
> examples
> > of taking quotes out of context that are truly
> > worth getting upset over. This case was BS.
>
> It is not BS. Maybe Greg Sargent sensationalized
> it a bit, but that's because he's a blogger for a
> website. He never claims to be part of a "fair
> and balanced" "news" organization. Either way,
> it's still nothing compared to the hype Fox News
> puts on trivial shit Obama does. The same Fox
> News that, coincidentally, Sarah Palin works for.
> The same Fox News that has some fat, pasty white
> guy (pick one) reminding us that Obama is taking
> us into some sort of communist-socialism.
>
> It is not BS, because Sarah Palin is, whether we
> like it or not, a leader. We should expect our
> leaders to be honest and truthful, and not distort
> the truth to fit into what they think should be
> reality. She distorted the truth of what Obama
> said, and that shouldn't be tolerated by Democrats
> and Republicans alike.
>
> That is the very reason I initially supported the
> Iraq war, but turned against it when the WMD angle
> was exposed as bullshit.
>
> Call me next time WashingTone-Locian starts
> defending a prominent Democrat/liberal for taking
> something a Republican said out of context to
> further their agenda, and I'll say the same thing.


ooooh...such an adult! I'll give you this much..at least for once you saw what a republican tool RV is and you actually said something! Im proud of you! Not that it did any good though..and that's where my comment comes in. RV is a douche bag of the first degree...Ive said it before...I'll say it again..and again..and again!

Registered Voter...a Big talking coward..big man on FFXU...little man in life.

Vince(1) Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> MrMephisto Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Vince(1) Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Very clever lies..."close to the truth". The
> > > truth is you are a mother fucking mouth piece
> > of
> > > the republican party...you eat ass!
> >
> > And you act like a fucking child. Here, I'll
> show
> > you how to disagree with someone while still
> > acting like an adult.
> >
> > Registered Voter Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > I am not buying into any rhetoric - on either
> > side
> > > of the issue. There are much more glaring
> > examples
> > > of taking quotes out of context that are
> truly
> > > worth getting upset over. This case was BS.
> >
> > It is not BS. Maybe Greg Sargent
> sensationalized
> > it a bit, but that's because he's a blogger for
> a
> > website. He never claims to be part of a "fair
> > and balanced" "news" organization. Either way,
> > it's still nothing compared to the hype Fox
> News
> > puts on trivial shit Obama does. The same Fox
> > News that, coincidentally, Sarah Palin works
> for.
> > The same Fox News that has some fat, pasty
> white
> > guy (pick one) reminding us that Obama is
> taking
> > us into some sort of communist-socialism.
> >
> > It is not BS, because Sarah Palin is, whether
> we
> > like it or not, a leader. We should expect our
> > leaders to be honest and truthful, and not
> distort
> > the truth to fit into what they think should be
> > reality. She distorted the truth of what Obama
> > said, and that shouldn't be tolerated by
> Democrats
> > and Republicans alike.
> >
> > That is the very reason I initially supported
> the
> > Iraq war, but turned against it when the WMD
> angle
> > was exposed as bullshit.
> >
> > Call me next time WashingTone-Locian starts
> > defending a prominent Democrat/liberal for
> taking
> > something a Republican said out of context to
> > further their agenda, and I'll say the same
> thing.
>
>
> ooooh...such an adult! I'll give you this
> much..at least for once you saw what a republican
> tool RV is and you actually said something! Im
> proud of you! Not that it did any good
> though..and that's where my comment comes in. RV
> is a douche bag of the first degree...Ive said it
> before...I'll say it again..and again..and again!


Vince(1),

.





/s/
your friend

PS - given the timings and dates of your bannings, I know exactly which federal agency you work for......

Magnum, PI Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

>
> Vince(1),
>
> /s/
> your friend
>
> PS - given the timings and dates of your bannings,
> I know exactly which federal agency you work
> for......



Really?? Vince has said numerous times he is retired and both Cary and Gravis have revealed that he uses AOL; I don't know many government agencies that use AOL. I'm sure you knew this already, being a Magnum P.I. and all.






\
Attachments:

eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Really?? Vince has said numerous times he is
> retired and both Cary and Gravis have revealed
> that he uses AOL; I don't know many government
> agencies that use AOL. I'm sure you knew this
> already, being a Magnum P.I. and all.


Yeah, all kinds of people tell the truth on the interwebz. Not retired, just stupid. Why not just see which agency is banned every so often after a Vince bomb?

This distraction/obsession with Sarah Palin is extraordinary.

Has anyone noticed that the PRESIDENT is a joke?

But, not a haha joke.