HomeFairfax General ForumArrest/Ticket SearchWiki newPictures/VideosChatArticlesLinksAbout
Off-Topic :  Fairfax Underground fairfax underground logo
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
BISHOPS are not POLITICAL LIARS promoting immigration: but only hispanic immigration of course
Posted by: breitbart ()
Date: January 19, 2020 01:40PM

They never say a damn word about Spain having an immigration WALL.

BISHOPS’ IMMIGRATION CHIEF: JESUS PART OF ‘REFUGEE FAMILY’

Joseph was a jewish man of good standing: an upper middle class carpenter with "friends" - who was well older than Mary - and had an estate to leave her. Mary was considered probate for marriage (despite being a virgin - forget why - some jewish thing about not being in the right place in life - was it poverty?), however Joseph was well respected enough that if he took her that there would be "no complaints against him". (now mary would be probate because she had no dowry and a charity case, while joseph - he was older and single but that was not to be considered)

Wikipedia is full of bullshit as usual: much of the history is oral history or resides in the writings of "those who knew" (the apostles) - the books democrats refuse to read. wikipedia doesn't even "admit" that joseph was a carpenter. absolutely stupid since jesus was a carpenter, working with tools inherited after joseph's death

At the time Israel was in great fear of muslims doing a genocide attack - the muslims came close to killing every Jew. Bethlehem Town more than they were a part of a country: a town in much danger of invasions. It could be the Romans, who had laid seige and now ruled the town, saved them from continual muslim attacks and genocide.

Jesus was never in danger of being accused of being "an illegal immigrant" for MANY reasons.

Joseph was never accused of "escaping mexico to get welfare from USA"


The Apostles, in a recount of Jesus sermon (usually without quoting exact words spoken (but sometimes quoting) - not necessarily exact or in-exact)

The sermon was PAY YOUR TAXES (but do not cheating, of course)



Mexico has avoided welfare for it's poor while building businesses and CASINOS and building MANY MANY MANSIONS and having a "real estate revival"

Mexico has denied all agreements to pay welfare for those THEY DO OWE WELFARE ON.


It's about the money.



And further more using donations to promote and cause "over-population" problems* in areas without means - while promoting abstinence in "white areas" - is a breach of trust. (japan is currently a good example - so populated you have mother and son living in room the size of a closet, they are nearly falling into the water over there. while some may say "they chose it", others would say - it seems irresponsible and what if anything happens? where is the safety net there?)

It's also about USA not wishing to become flooded with Mexicans (as oposed to flooded by Swedes or a mix of nations or canadians). Flooded simply because Mexico refuses to follow rules that, say Canada, does follow.

We're already far past our quota due to illegal immigration.

AND IT WAS ILLEGAL AND, MINIMALLY IN PLACES, STILL IS ILLEGAL.

The Bishop, if we can believe a reporter reporting, is a lying democrat. (note: reporters have been known to completely lie about things the Pope or others have said - putting words in their mouths)


Jesus said pay your taxes. He didn't say commit crimes and flee into USA and call them the devil.



.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: BISHOPS are not POLITICAL LIARS promoting immigration: but only hispanic immigration of course
Posted by: wikipedia is full of shit ()
Date: January 19, 2020 01:51PM

Now those who "know about Joseph Jesus and Mary" (their lineage relation to other jewish families and walks in life) are: the jews who kept record during the time (obviously they didn't have computers and records might be thin)

And the Apostles and some parishoners of the time too.

The Church kept many things as oral history not writing all of it down "immediately" since it was all commonly asked and spoke (also because back then - everything was oral to parishoners, parishoners weren't allowed to have bibles).

Protestants refused the Chuch and (wikipedia is made by athiests and protestants) and refuse to believe the facts the Church lays out or has written.

THE PROBLEM IS THAT PROTESTANTS CANNOT GET ORAL HISTORY FROM EARLY TEXTS (the kind a historian might construe has "recorded history") - BECAUSE IT WASN'T WRITTEN DOWN - it was an oral history handed down from Apostles and between parishoners

it's still true to this DAY that the Catholics do not prefer parishoners to "interpret the bible in any manner while reading it" and that Priests will orally guide them

Options: ReplyQuote


Your Name: 
Your Email (Optional): 
Subject: 
Attach a file
  • No file can be larger than 75 MB
  • All files together cannot be larger than 300 MB
  • 30 more file(s) can be attached to this message
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **      **  ********  **    **  **     **  **     ** 
 **  **  **  **        **   **   **     **  **     ** 
 **  **  **  **        **  **    **     **  **     ** 
 **  **  **  ******    *****     **     **  **     ** 
 **  **  **  **        **  **    **     **   **   **  
 **  **  **  **        **   **   **     **    ** **   
  ***  ***   ********  **    **   *******      ***    
This forum powered by Phorum.