Toyota has had to recall several models of its AEB-equipped cars: it failed to break in some instances - and did emergency brakes for (ie, somthing innert like mcdonalds trash in the street) in others

IT'S A CRIME THEY EVEN PUT SUCH BULLSHIT ON THE ROAD

THEY ARE USING USA PEDESTRIANS AND FAMILIES AS LAB RATS

FUCKING ASIANS

they are collecting data for their bad "AI" software that relies on past data to perform - they don't give a crap who dies

What’s With Hitting Parked Emergency Vehicles? At least three times this year, Tesla cars have plowed into parked vehicles.

https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/270049-why-self-driving-cars-keep-running-into-things

Google / chinese AI is BAD AI - it bases decision making on past data and some over-general rules of success and often mean failure

there are many kinds of AI (having personally read AI magazines in the early 1990's) - the kind that's being used today is TOTALLY FAKE - it's the dummy AI of early computing (it has no scientific value - success decisions made upon past data)

there are thinkers, learning systems, directly programmed intelligencia, all kinds of

the AI being "marketed heavily" by google an nVdia an others forces you to write rules that decide the success or failure of PAST EXPERIENCED EVENTS

specifically - programming such a thing in a driverlesss situation would require running over things intentionally: for data, to TRAIN THE LEARNING SYSTEM

but it gets worse - some of these "driverless braking" are JUST BAD MATH meaning it's just some equation that says "if it's on the camera hit the brake hard" - which is totally irresponsible. what about the thinking? there is no thinking that's all a big scam to sell stocks, cheat customers. doesn't work. all a lie.

think maybe the white powder with all the fancy write-ups is actually just badly made white powder that never had a real chemmical formula?

is your side effects list longer than the proposed benefit? is death on the warning label?

do you suspect no real chemistry was done it's all a scam and fda never tested it and it's all poison pills from germany?

CALL 1-800-BAD-DRUG

oh your illegal alien doctor prescribed it? well your fucked then aren't you!

if they make fake medicine and have mass lawsuits on tv (noting those effected will already be DEAD and not be able to collect right?)

you bet your ass those brakes are fake

you bet your ass

little red riding hood

THE FACT IS POPULAR LEARNING SYSTEM AI IS A TOTAL FAILURE (it's useful in trivial situations like npc xbox game and choose seating arrangement for airlines ?)

IT'S IMPOSSIBLE TO RUN OVER ENOUGH PEOPLE TO TRAIN IT

but they are telling you these cars "use ai"

but i just told you learning system AI could never ever be used

the fact is the kind of intelligence needed would be directly programmed (an app, a program) which does not thinking on it's own (guess work disallowed) ... of a size and complexity that's indescribable

they are telling investors and the public there is artificial intelligence involved

I SUBMIT THAT'S A LIE - because the only "math" that could do the job is not classified as "artificial intelligence" because it has no and does not revolve around any "evolved decisions" (only correct pre-programmed ones would be allowed). even then - there would be no time or space to run such a mammoth of a program. INFACT, IN THE 80'S AND 90'S it was semi-popular joke to set up programmers who didn't understand the world couldn't fit into a computer for a few laughs at their lack of "perspective of scope and scale"

so in the 90's the AI gig for learning systems was HELP SYSTEMS, using AI to steer questions to an answer - it was one of the very few areas where AI "could find a job"

IT WAS ABANDONED. it costs allot of IT staff money and WEB PAGES, combined with integral searching, were more "book like organized" and far more useful. microsoft developer network is a good example of a website that one tried AI (for blue screen questions) and instead become an online WEB publication of information (they dropped the AI)

ONLINE SATELLITE INTERACTING CAR WITH AUTOMATIC BREAKING?

TOYOTA has your financial information?

if they crash your car you have to buy a new one

DO YOU FUCKING THING JAP CEO'S don't know that is a way to make money - if you have the money crash your car you got to buy a new one? why? because your locked into insurace buying it (oh did i mention japs are huge into the car insurance companies? well you have ALLOT TO LEARN ABOUT FOREIGNERS, AMERICA, they aren't all loyal to america)

your BMW is going to crash itself because it pays to crash itself

corrupt down to the wire with no slack for pulling on it

Toyotas are being recalled AGAIN for the Takata airbag problems. Turns out the re-engineered new ones only last for about 3 years, then they have to recall again to replace, for those living in high humidity climate regions..

eytyet Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Toyotas are being recalled AGAIN for the Takata
> airbag problems. Turns out the re-engineered new
> ones only last for about 3 years, then they have
> to recall again to replace, for those living in
> high humidity climate regions..




No surprise at all. Honda was involved in a coverup over the takata airbags in their cars. Consumers were being killed, no biggie for honda.

YUGOSLAVIA - in the ?early 2000's the government opened the doors for car insurance companies to come in (previously kept out)

Insurers raced to become dominant in the area.

They got initial high accident data (tried to get the government to implement dui's to help out) but had mis-understood it.

THE ACCIDENTS CONTINUED AT AN ALARMING RATE

the insurers leanred that yugo's though nothing of ripping off insurance companies from foreign countries: they were intently wrecking cars to get new ones WHOLE SALE

the insurers could do nothing - they couldn't "ask the governent to arrest 1/2 the nation": they were FUCKED - took a big loss in yugoslavia

i'm sure all the toyota lover will be offended

that must be part of the conservative strategy!

to offend you while producing facts your cheating!

so at great obama cost (obama appointed NTSB) if ntsb collects data from these crashes, has comments, feeds it to japchina

WHY THE HELL WOULD THEY EVER DO A SINGLE CRASH TEST? just wait for sucker NTSB and insurance to pay, that's how you get your studies funded

some people undertand that big computer companies have thrives by "forced upgrades", by intentionally cross-wiring new software to kill old computers and old software (thus the name "forced upgrade")

LESS PEOPLE KNOW THAT CAR MAKERS AND DEALERSHIPS HAVE BEEN USING FORCED UPGRADES TO get more money.

"fake recalls" - they send you a threatening letter you won't be safe if you don't come in - whne you come in they say the work is done and they hit you up for a $$$list of repairs (which is EXACTLY why the phony recalls happen - to force you back into the dealership)

you get a threatening letter your car brake safety software needs upgrading ...

* if you don't do it and there's an accident, you will be sued for ignoring a safety issue - it won't be Toyota's fault

* but they always have a software upgade ready, so you'll have to camp outside Toyota if you want all the latest safety updates

and what if this forced `safety' upgrades COMES UP AFTER YOUR OUT OF WARRANTEE ??

the kind that comes to you out of warrantee let me read it to you: new car computer mother fucker - pay up

snow cannot trigger braking, it falls like white snowfakes



it's everywhere after all, and radar doesn't reflect right off of it

For example radar is often transmitted through cold, dry snow. If the transmitted signal then hits a patch of smooth ice underneath the snow, it will reflect back up through the snow. ... Surface variations on the order magnitude of the radar wavelength will scatter radar as specified by the Raleigh criterion.

http://terpconnect.umd.edu/~gsun/radar/sar_theory.html

just a spec of dust in the mountain of major issues

on snowy roads with reduced friction (u = 0.3). In addition, an AEB system adapted to road friction was designed for this study and compared with the conventional AEB on snowy roads with reduced friction

DID YOU SAY FRICTION? GUESS WHAT ELSE HAS NO FRICTION
Attachments:

this is a road with j-walkers on it. the radar says so clearly, and they will be charged with j-walking by the local democrat judge if they get hit by a toyota and try to sue

however stupid people are, not all things important are easily recognized - though a 4yr old would easily recognize this - an uber smart car would certainly fail to recognize a thin plastic ribbon - MORESO - WHAT IT'S SIGNIFICANCE IS

Topaz-V MR-320M russia radar is a 2 demensional ship tracking system (to avoid collision or give firing coordinates, your choice)

like any radar between 80's and 2000's it has layers: the radar return, computer readouts on top

IT TAKES AN EXPERT TO READ IT, because radars have "ghosts" and other complex features that even trick experts during wartime (ie, when they are not fooling around, still fooled)

a fine maritime system will set you back a few million dollars: and wouldn't be anywhere near technically capable of keep you safe in a driving situation

these child abuser democrats are ADVERTISING DRIVERLESS CARS ARE SAFE AROUND TRICK OR TREATORS - look closer to the left panel you'll see a cube and that's an ad to and for young males to get excited about the AI lie, the big ai lie

GOOGLE - that's google running that ad

https://www.safercar.gov/Vehicle+Shoppers/Safety+Technology/aeb-1/

obama appointed NTSB says AEB is a safety system

THAT'S THE BEST REASON TO DEMAND IT NOT BE INSTALLED IN YOUR CAR !!!

collision avoidance system, also known as a precrash system, forward collision warning system, or collision mitigation system, is an automobile safety system designed to prevent or reduce the severity of a collision. It uses radar (all-weather) and sometimes laser (LIDAR) and camera (employing image recognition) to detect


write the answer below this line
______________________________

OBAMA's new mansion! detected that one a mile away

YOUR ALL DOING VERY WELL ! ~ *

this is how two ships with million dollar radar maritime tracking systems avoid collision that (someone with eyes looking can see a mile away)

but drones ___________ but they _______________



THERE'S A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AIR DRONE AND LAND DRONES

IN THE AIR: ACCIDENTS ARE MEANT TO HAPPEN, it's mission complete

creating accidents and chaos is a whole different story than that of avoiding them

you can trust a drone to brake hell loose - that's not the same as recognizing potential dangers

For the first time, US servicemen were killed last week as a result of friendly fire from an unmanned drone aircraft.

United States officials say that the two hit lost their lives due to a malfunctioning drone that targeted and killed them

d

d

the police will arrest him soon

Police: Tesla on Autopilot When It Hit Connecticut Officer’s Cruiser

(of course, the driver is lying about the car being at fault? the police are lying they are the bitches of democrat insurers, and etc)

d

d

d

d

d

d

d

d

d

d

d