Vindman, by working with Adam Shiffy WITHOUT ORDER TO DO SO OR LEAVE, was in-subordinate to Trump (his commander in chief) and other upper staff.

Like other arrested for similar acts, he rattled off his mouth about OFFICIAL BUSINESS of the President for political gain. Infact Vindman was PAID for his service of Ukraine strategic relations during "the phone call" (which contains no crimes): so it is CERTAINLY his duty moreso than any other member of the military to follow chain of command respecting that call: a call which was a nothing-burger.

HIS CAREER? NOW IN THE DRAIN.

Vindman btw is a Ukraine national - was not born in USA.

how quickly foreigners turn to european ways: it's why they aren't allowed to be President or even run for president

Trump is going to be impeached.

Once again the only defense Trumpers have is to insult the people telling the truth.

Military are free to use their free time as they please and their free speach.

THEY ARE NOT FREE TO:

* enter into lawsuits against the president without due cause

* speak about matters involving their own duty they are not cleared to talk about

e3rf Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> how quickly foreigners turn to european ways:
> it's why they aren't allowed to be President or
> even run for president

is more American than Trump will ever pretend to be.

Got more medals than Donnie, too.

“It was inappropriate,” Vindman said. “It was improper for the president to request, to demand an investigation into a political opponent, especially a foreign power where there is at best dubious belief that this could be an impartial investigation and that this would have significant implications if it became public knowledge.”

Vindman said that given the "power disparity" between the United States and Ukraine, it was clear that Trump's request for investigations was more of a demand.

This dude, he looks like the next mass shooting perp

Truth be Known Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> “It was inappropriate,” Vindman said. “It
> was improper for the president to request, to
> demand an investigation into a political opponent,
> especially a foreign power where there is at best
> dubious belief that this could be an impartial
> investigation and that this would have significant
> implications if it became public knowledge.”
>
Vindman said that given the "power disparity"
> between the United States and Ukraine, it was
> clear that Trump's request for investigations was
> more of a demand.

Vindman is an asshole..and a traitor..he is loyal to the globalists, not the US

Lieutenant Colonel Vindman fulfilled his constitutional duty by obeying a lawful congressional subpeona.

Trump is compelling unlawful acts from subordinates in attempts to continue to obstruct justice into his crimes and impeachable offenses. Which itself is an impeachable offense.

Lieutenant Colonel Vindman bled on the battlefield for America.

Trump claimed he had bone spurs five times.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/20/2019 02:59AM by Gerrymanderer2.

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Lieutenant Colonel Vindman fulfilled his
> constitutional duty by obeying a lawful
> congressional subpeona.
>
> Trump is compelling unlawful acts from
> subordinates in attempts to continue to obstruct
> justice into his crimes and impeachable offenses.
> Which itself is an impeachable offense.
>
> Lieutenant Colonel Vindman bled on the battlefield
> for America.
>
> Trump claimed he had bone spurs five times.

You're stupid.

Trumpers Hate the Truth Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Trump is going to be impeached.
>
> Once again the only defense Trumpers have is to
> insult the people telling the truth.


This impeachment is meaningless. Even Pelosi said she should only impeach if she has broad bipartisan support. She doesn't have that. And I'm not convinced she even has enough democrat votes.

Mark j Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Vindman is an asshole..and a traitor..he is loyal
> to the globalists, not the US


I would initially think you are a Russian troll, but your written communication skills are so lacking, I concluded otherwise.

But I wouldn't bother attacking Vindman on the internet. Looks like the U.S. Army has his back and would fuck you degenerate traitors up.

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> But I wouldn't bother attacking Vindman on the
> internet. Looks like the U.S. Army has his back
> and would fuck you degenerate traitors up.


Thanks for proving, once again, that you're just some autistic loser with no life, no prospects for a life, and the biggest retard on the Underground. Your posts are shit.

Major General Fruppie Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Lieutenant Colonel Vindman fulfilled his
> > constitutional duty by obeying a lawful
> > congressional subpeona.
> >
> > Trump is compelling unlawful acts from
> > subordinates in attempts to continue to
> obstruct
> > justice into his crimes and impeachable
> offenses.
> > Which itself is an impeachable offense.
> >
> > Lieutenant Colonel Vindman bled on the
> battlefield
> > for America.
> >
> > Trump claimed he had bone spurs five times.
>
> You're stupid.

He may be stupid, but he is factually correct on each and every point he makes.

Trump is fucked.

Factually speaking Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Major General Fruppie Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Lieutenant Colonel Vindman fulfilled his
> > > constitutional duty by obeying a lawful
> > > congressional subpeona.
> > >
> > > Trump is compelling unlawful acts from
> > > subordinates in attempts to continue to
> > obstruct
> > > justice into his crimes and impeachable
> > offenses.
> > > Which itself is an impeachable offense.
> > >
> > > Lieutenant Colonel Vindman bled on the
> > battlefield
> > > for America.
> > >
> > > Trump claimed he had bone spurs five times.
> >
> > You're stupid.
>
> He may be stupid, but he is factually correct on
> each and every point he makes.
>
> Trump is fucked.


His second point has not been proven and is, therefore, not factually correct. His first and third points are indeed factually correct but has nothing to do with refuting the point that Vindman is insubordinate (the ascertain in the thread). And Gerry being stupid is factually correct, as has been proven way past the point of metaphysical certitude within his first dozen posts on FFU.

The polls indicate that Trump is going to win reelection. Don't know if the dems have more cards to play or not. We'll see. But, for now, Trump is not fucked.

A decorated American soldier and his family are under government protection right now.

Not because of ISIS. Not because of Iran. Not because of North Korea.

Because of Donald Trump, the so-called “president”.

He served his country Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> A decorated American soldier and his family are
> under government protection right now.
>
> Not because of ISIS. Not because of Iran. Not
> because of North Korea.
>
> Because of Donald Trump, the so-called
> “president”.


I bet you wet your little diaper when they went after Mike Flynn then.

How that fat little fuck can pass his APFT is a question we should be asking. This pillsbury doughboy is packing about 30 extra pounds.

So did I asshole Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I bet you wet your little diaper when they went
> after Mike Flynn then.


Flynn was arrested for breaking the law. Not providing testimony under oath.

And it’s actually okay to “go after” people who are breaking the law.

retarded analogy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> And it’s actually okay to “go after” people
> who are breaking the law.


Remember you said that cupcake.

John Durham, approaching fast Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> retarded analogy Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > And it’s actually okay to “go after”
> people
> > who are breaking the law.
>
>
> Remember you said that cupcake.

We'll take our chances, sweet cheeks.

John Durham, approaching fast Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> retarded analogy Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > And it’s actually okay to “go after”
> people
> > who are breaking the law.
>
>
> Remember you said that cupcake.

Yeah just like Hillary, Eric Holder, Andrew McCabe, and that Time magazine reporter Trump threatened, are all going to prison.

Time for the alt-right to get a new schtick, pal. Once you’re wrong about a dozen times it gets seriously old.

Waiting for it Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> John Durham, approaching fast Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > retarded analogy Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> >
> > > And it’s actually okay to “go after”
> > people
> > > who are breaking the law.
> >
> >
> > Remember you said that cupcake.
>
> We'll take our chances, sweet cheeks.


No you won't lollipop. You'll be out in the streets with your pussy hats on, protesting the "unjust" trail and "political stunts" that Barr and Durham are going to unleash.

by comrade Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Waiting for it Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > John Durham, approaching fast Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > retarded analogy Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > >
> > > > And it’s actually okay to “go after”
> > > people
> > > > who are breaking the law.
> > >
> > >
> > > Remember you said that cupcake.
> >
> > We'll take our chances, sweet cheeks.
>
>
> No you won't lollipop. You'll be out in the
> streets with your pussy hats on, protesting the
> "unjust" trail and "political stunts" that Barr
> and Durham are going to unleash.

But if helps get you through the day (especially today), go with it. In the meantime, impeachment will proceed.

Wishful Thinking Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> by comrade Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Waiting for it Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > John Durham, approaching fast Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > retarded analogy Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > >
> > > > > And it’s actually okay to “go
> after”
> > > > people
> > > > > who are breaking the law.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Remember you said that cupcake.
> > >
> > > We'll take our chances, sweet cheeks.
> >
> >
> > No you won't lollipop. You'll be out in the
> > streets with your pussy hats on, protesting the
> > "unjust" trail and "political stunts" that Barr
> > and Durham are going to unleash.
>
> But if helps get you through the day (especially
> today), go with it. In the meantime, impeachment
> will proceed.


All polls show this is failing badly. I'm cool. Especially today.

"figured" it was quid pro quo Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Wishful Thinking Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > by comrade Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Waiting for it Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > John Durham, approaching fast Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > retarded analogy Wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----
> > > > >
> > > > > > And it’s actually okay to “go
> > after”
> > > > > people
> > > > > > who are breaking the law.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Remember you said that cupcake.
> > > >
> > > > We'll take our chances, sweet cheeks.
> > >
> > >
> > > No you won't lollipop. You'll be out in the
> > > streets with your pussy hats on, protesting
> the
> > > "unjust" trail and "political stunts" that
> Barr
> > > and Durham are going to unleash.
> >
> > But if helps get you through the day
> (especially
> > today), go with it. In the meantime,
> impeachment
> > will proceed.
>
>
> All polls show this is failing badly. I'm cool.
> Especially today.

Surprising you would mention polls, being a Trumpkin and all. Fake news, I've heard them called.

But again, any port in a storm. Enjoy the day, I sure will.

Polls??? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> "figured" it was quid pro quo Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Wishful Thinking Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > by comrade Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > Waiting for it Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > John Durham, approaching fast Wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----
> > > > > > retarded analogy Wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > And it’s actually okay to “go
> > > after”
> > > > > > people
> > > > > > > who are breaking the law.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Remember you said that cupcake.
> > > > >
> > > > > We'll take our chances, sweet cheeks.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > No you won't lollipop. You'll be out in
> the
> > > > streets with your pussy hats on, protesting
> > the
> > > > "unjust" trail and "political stunts" that
> > Barr
> > > > and Durham are going to unleash.
> > >
> > > But if helps get you through the day
> > (especially
> > > today), go with it. In the meantime,
> > impeachment
> > > will proceed.
> >
> >
> > All polls show this is failing badly. I'm cool.
>
> > Especially today.
>
> Surprising you would mention polls, being a
> Trumpkin and all. Fake news, I've heard them
> called.
>
> But again, any port in a storm. Enjoy the day, I
> sure will.


It's a wonderful day pumpkin. Trump is winning. Dems are failing. What's not to like.

good times Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> It's a wonderful day pumpkin. Trump is winning.
> Dems are failing. What's not to like.

You also believe in the Easter Bunny

good times Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Polls??? Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > "figured" it was quid pro quo Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Wishful Thinking Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > by comrade Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > Waiting for it Wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----
> > > > > > John Durham, approaching fast Wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----
> > > > > > > retarded analogy Wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > -----
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > And it’s actually okay to “go
> > > > after”
> > > > > > > people
> > > > > > > > who are breaking the law.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Remember you said that cupcake.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We'll take our chances, sweet cheeks.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > No you won't lollipop. You'll be out in
> > the
> > > > > streets with your pussy hats on,
> protesting
> > > the
> > > > > "unjust" trail and "political stunts"
> that
> > > Barr
> > > > > and Durham are going to unleash.
> > > >
> > > > But if helps get you through the day
> > > (especially
> > > > today), go with it. In the meantime,
> > > impeachment
> > > > will proceed.
> > >
> > >
> > > All polls show this is failing badly. I'm
> cool.
> >
> > > Especially today.
> >
> > Surprising you would mention polls, being a
> > Trumpkin and all. Fake news, I've heard them
> > called.
> >
> > But again, any port in a storm. Enjoy the day,
> I
> > sure will.
>
>
> It's a wonderful day pumpkin. Trump is winning.
> Dems are failing. What's not to like.

Well, you are loyal, I will give you that. The sad thing is that the man you are giving your loyalty to is unworthy of it.

Enjoy Trump's trial. It will be educational.

Welcome to Fantasy Island Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> good times Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >
> > It's a wonderful day pumpkin. Trump is winning.
>
> > Dems are failing. What's not to like.
>
> You also believe in the Easter Bunny


So lame grandpa. So very lame.

Trying to prevent a subpoena'd witness from testifying before a tribunal is the classic example of Obstruction of Justice. Applying to the court for a protective order to prevent the witness from testifying is allowed. Telling the witness not to appear or threatening the witness if the witness did appear is not.

Add another charge Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Trying to prevent a subpoena'd witness from
> testifying before a tribunal is the classic
> example of Obstruction of Justice. Applying to
> the court for a protective order to prevent the
> witness from testifying is allowed. Telling the
> witness not to appear or threatening the witness
> if the witness did appear is not.


Learn the term, "executive privilege" shit-for-brains. Then take a course in constitutional law where one branch can not exercise authority over any other branch. It takes two branches to successfully exercise authority over another branch.

And who uses the word "tribunal"? Are you, by chance, a commie? That's a commie word.

Congress doesn't get to decide what's legally allowed. Only the SCOTUS can do that.

Must see TV Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> good times Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Polls??? Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > "figured" it was quid pro quo Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > Wishful Thinking Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > by comrade Wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----
> > > > > > Waiting for it Wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----
> > > > > > > John Durham, approaching fast Wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > -----
> > > > > > > > retarded analogy Wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -----
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > And it’s actually okay to “go
> > > > > after”
> > > > > > > > people
> > > > > > > > > who are breaking the law.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Remember you said that cupcake.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > We'll take our chances, sweet cheeks.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > No you won't lollipop. You'll be out
> in
> > > the
> > > > > > streets with your pussy hats on,
> > protesting
> > > > the
> > > > > > "unjust" trail and "political stunts"
> > that
> > > > Barr
> > > > > > and Durham are going to unleash.
> > > > >
> > > > > But if helps get you through the day
> > > > (especially
> > > > > today), go with it. In the meantime,
> > > > impeachment
> > > > > will proceed.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > All polls show this is failing badly. I'm
> > cool.
> > >
> > > > Especially today.
> > >
> > > Surprising you would mention polls, being a
> > > Trumpkin and all. Fake news, I've heard them
> > > called.
> > >
> > > But again, any port in a storm. Enjoy the
> day,
> > I
> > > sure will.
> >
> >
> > It's a wonderful day pumpkin. Trump is winning.
>
> > Dems are failing. What's not to like.
>
> Well, you are loyal, I will give you that. The
> sad thing is that the man you are giving your
> loyalty to is unworthy of it.
>
> Enjoy Trump's trial. It will be educational.


Very doubtful. Like 97% of the rest of the country, I'm not watching it. Less than 10 million people in the country are. You're apparently one of them. How sad you are.

Meanwhile, the rest of us have long moved on after giving you 2½ years to prove your Russian hoax and then having you fail to badly. No one believe you anymore.

will be resolved by 2022 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Add another charge Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Trying to prevent a subpoena'd witness from
> > testifying before a tribunal is the classic
> > example of Obstruction of Justice. Applying to
> > the court for a protective order to prevent the
> > witness from testifying is allowed. Telling
> the
> > witness not to appear or threatening the
> witness
> > if the witness did appear is not.
>
>
> Learn the term, "executive privilege"
> shit-for-brains. Then take a course in
> constitutional law where one branch can not
> exercise authority over any other branch. It
> takes two branches to successfully exercise
> authority over another branch.
>
> And who uses the word "tribunal"? Are you, by
> chance, a commie? That's a commie word.
>
> Congress doesn't get to decide what's legally
> allowed. Only the SCOTUS can do that.

Seems you learn something new everyday. But so I don't need to learn from you in the future, please:

1. Point out where in the text of the constitution "executive privilege" is mentioned.

2. Describe to me how the impeachment process is not Congress exercising authority, without the judiciary's involvement, over the president.

3. Oh, and tribunal is an English word describing any body with decision making authority. But you knew that.

Enjoy the hearings.

Your student Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> will be resolved by 2022 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Add another charge Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Trying to prevent a subpoena'd witness from
> > > testifying before a tribunal is the classic
> > > example of Obstruction of Justice. Applying
> to
> > > the court for a protective order to prevent
> the
> > > witness from testifying is allowed. Telling
> > the
> > > witness not to appear or threatening the
> > witness
> > > if the witness did appear is not.
> >
> >
> > Learn the term, "executive privilege"
> > shit-for-brains. Then take a course in
> > constitutional law where one branch can not
> > exercise authority over any other branch. It
> > takes two branches to successfully exercise
> > authority over another branch.
> >
> > And who uses the word "tribunal"? Are you, by
> > chance, a commie? That's a commie word.
> >
> > Congress doesn't get to decide what's legally
> > allowed. Only the SCOTUS can do that.
>
> Seems you learn something new everyday. But so I
> don't need to learn from you in the future,
> please:
>
> 1. Point out where in the text of the
> constitution "executive privilege" is mentioned.
>
> 2. Describe to me how the impeachment process is
> not Congress exercising authority, without the
> judiciary's involvement, over the president.
>
> 3. Oh, and tribunal is an English word describing
> any body with decision making authority. But you
> knew that.
>
> Enjoy the hearings.


1. Didn't say it was in the constitution. learn to use google (after you learn to read). It's all explained there.

2. The House can impeach, and the Senate can remove. But that's not compelling the executive branch (i.e. exercising authority). That's politics and has nothing to do with the point that was being made about the legality of ignoring a subpoena. Just as the executive branch can use their police powers to jail a member of Congress, that's not exercising authority over the legislative branch.

3. Commissar is also a word in the English dictionary comrade. Isn't used in the US and neither is tribunal Ivan.

Because you apparently have severe Alzheimer's, I won't bother to explain to you again that I'm not watching the hearings, like 97% of my fellow Americans. You and your fellow old hippies in the old folks home probably have the TV in the bingo room fixed on CNN. Sucks to be you.

Maybe 2023 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Your student Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > will be resolved by 2022 Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Add another charge Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > Trying to prevent a subpoena'd witness from
> > > > testifying before a tribunal is the classic
> > > > example of Obstruction of Justice.
> Applying
> > to
> > > > the court for a protective order to prevent
> > the
> > > > witness from testifying is allowed.
> Telling
> > > the
> > > > witness not to appear or threatening the
> > > witness
> > > > if the witness did appear is not.
> > >
> > >
> > > Learn the term, "executive privilege"
> > > shit-for-brains. Then take a course in
> > > constitutional law where one branch can not
> > > exercise authority over any other branch. It
> > > takes two branches to successfully exercise
> > > authority over another branch.
> > >
> > > And who uses the word "tribunal"? Are you,
> by
> > > chance, a commie? That's a commie word.
> > >
> > > Congress doesn't get to decide what's legally
> > > allowed. Only the SCOTUS can do that.
> >
> > Seems you learn something new everyday. But so
> I
> > don't need to learn from you in the future,
> > please:
> >
> > 1. Point out where in the text of the
> > constitution "executive privilege" is
> mentioned.
> >
> > 2. Describe to me how the impeachment process
> is
> > not Congress exercising authority, without the
> > judiciary's involvement, over the president.
> >
> > 3. Oh, and tribunal is an English word
> describing
> > any body with decision making authority. But
> you
> > knew that.
> >
> > Enjoy the hearings.
>
>
> 1. Didn't say it was in the constitution. learn
> to use google (after you learn to read). It's all
> explained there.
>
> 2. The House can impeach, and the Senate can
> remove. But that's not compelling the executive
> branch (i.e. exercising authority). That's
> politics and has nothing to do with the point that
> was being made about the legality of ignoring a
> subpoena. Just as the executive branch can use
> their police powers to jail a member of Congress,
> that's not exercising authority over the
> legislative branch.
>
> 3. Commissar is also a word in the English
> dictionary comrade. Isn't used in the US and
> neither is tribunal Ivan.
>
> Because you apparently have severe Alzheimer's, I
> won't bother to explain to you again that I'm not
> watching the hearings, like 97% of my fellow
> Americans. You and your fellow old hippies in the
> old folks home probably have the TV in the bingo
> room fixed on CNN. Sucks to be you.

You are the expert. LMAO

But seriously, you seem like you are in a shitty mood. I know the news of the day has been kind of depressing, but you need to walk away from it once in a while. Get out of the basement and look around. Maybe even get a job. Finding a sense of self worth, even if false, will do wonders for your outlook on life.

Enjoy the hearings.

1. Airborne rangers lowered their standards to let this fat ass wimp wear the beret or scroll.

2. Wife gets a lot of HOV violations

3. Live in Woodbridge.

Sad

Can't judge a horse Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Trumpers Hate the Truth Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Trump is going to be impeached.
> >
> > Once again the only defense Trumpers have is to
> > insult the people telling the truth.
>
>
> This impeachment is meaningless. Even Pelosi said
> she should only impeach if she has broad
> bipartisan support. She doesn't have that. And
> I'm not convinced she even has enough democrat
> votes.


GOP just released a $7 million ad campaign in House districts that Trump won that has a dem rep. Wonder if that CIA bitch Spanberger is going to get hit with these. She's towed the Pelosi line for a year and half.

His wifey Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> 1. Airborne rangers lowered their standards to let
> this fat ass wimp wear the beret or scroll.
>
> 2. Wife gets a lot of HOV violations
>
> 3. Live in Woodbridge.
>
> Sad


His twin brother, also in the US Army, is just as fat. Here's a pic of the two of them together....

 
Attachments:

Red Dawn Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Can't judge a horse Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Trumpers Hate the Truth Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Trump is going to be impeached.
> > >
> > > Once again the only defense Trumpers have is
> to
> > > insult the people telling the truth.
> >
> >
> > This impeachment is meaningless. Even Pelosi
> said
> > she should only impeach if she has broad
> > bipartisan support. She doesn't have that.
> And
> > I'm not convinced she even has enough democrat
> > votes.
>
>
> GOP just released a $7 million ad campaign in
> House districts that Trump won that has a dem rep.
> Wonder if that CIA bitch Spanberger is going to
> get hit with these. She's towed the Pelosi line
> for a year and half.

Dems will spend every bit as much as Trump. And the ads won't cost much to make. All they have to do is pull out all Trump sound bites (such as the one about NK no longer being a nuclear threat). The scripts of the ads will write themselves.

After today, the Dems have the votes in the House. Maybe not in the Senate, but that is OK. All those Republicans who vote to acquit will have to explain why it is OK to use tax money as a personal campaign slush fund. That will suffice.

Money is no object Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Red Dawn Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Can't judge a horse Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Trumpers Hate the Truth Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > Trump is going to be impeached.
> > > >
> > > > Once again the only defense Trumpers have
> is
> > to
> > > > insult the people telling the truth.
> > >
> > >
> > > This impeachment is meaningless. Even Pelosi
> > said
> > > she should only impeach if she has broad
> > > bipartisan support. She doesn't have that.
> > And
> > > I'm not convinced she even has enough
> democrat
> > > votes.
> >
> >
> > GOP just released a $7 million ad campaign in
> > House districts that Trump won that has a dem
> rep.
> > Wonder if that CIA bitch Spanberger is going
> to
> > get hit with these. She's towed the Pelosi
> line
> > for a year and half.
>
> Dems will spend every bit as much as Trump. And
> the ads won't cost much to make. All they have to
> do is pull out all Trump sound bites (such as the
> one about NK no longer being a nuclear threat).
> The scripts of the ads will write themselves.
>
> After today, the Dems have the votes in the House.
> Maybe not in the Senate, but that is OK. All
> those Republicans who vote to acquit will have to
> explain why it is OK to use tax money as a
> personal campaign slush fund. That will suffice.


Where have we all heard this before lol.....

sure skippy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Money is no object Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Red Dawn Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Can't judge a horse Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > Trumpers Hate the Truth Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > Trump is going to be impeached.
> > > > >
> > > > > Once again the only defense Trumpers have
> > is
> > > to
> > > > > insult the people telling the truth.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > This impeachment is meaningless. Even
> Pelosi
> > > said
> > > > she should only impeach if she has broad
> > > > bipartisan support. She doesn't have that.
>
> > > And
> > > > I'm not convinced she even has enough
> > democrat
> > > > votes.
> > >
> > >
> > > GOP just released a $7 million ad campaign in
> > > House districts that Trump won that has a dem
> > rep.
> > > Wonder if that CIA bitch Spanberger is going
> > to
> > > get hit with these. She's towed the Pelosi
> > line
> > > for a year and half.
> >
> > Dems will spend every bit as much as Trump.
> And
> > the ads won't cost much to make. All they have
> to
> > do is pull out all Trump sound bites (such as
> the
> > one about NK no longer being a nuclear threat).
>
> > The scripts of the ads will write themselves.
> >
> > After today, the Dems have the votes in the
> House.
> > Maybe not in the Senate, but that is OK. All
> > those Republicans who vote to acquit will have
> to
> > explain why it is OK to use tax money as a
> > personal campaign slush fund. That will
> suffice.
>
>
> Where have we all heard this before lol.....

You will hear about it a lot more. Trial in the Senate early next year.

Get used to it Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> sure skippy Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Money is no object Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Red Dawn Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > Can't judge a horse Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > Trumpers Hate the Truth Wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----
> > > > > > Trump is going to be impeached.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Once again the only defense Trumpers
> have
> > > is
> > > > to
> > > > > > insult the people telling the truth.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > This impeachment is meaningless. Even
> > Pelosi
> > > > said
> > > > > she should only impeach if she has broad
> > > > > bipartisan support. She doesn't have
> that.
> >
> > > > And
> > > > > I'm not convinced she even has enough
> > > democrat
> > > > > votes.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > GOP just released a $7 million ad campaign
> in
> > > > House districts that Trump won that has a
> dem
> > > rep.
> > > > Wonder if that CIA bitch Spanberger is
> going
> > > to
> > > > get hit with these. She's towed the Pelosi
> > > line
> > > > for a year and half.
> > >
> > > Dems will spend every bit as much as Trump.
> > And
> > > the ads won't cost much to make. All they
> have
> > to
> > > do is pull out all Trump sound bites (such as
> > the
> > > one about NK no longer being a nuclear
> threat).
> >
> > > The scripts of the ads will write themselves.
> > >
> > > After today, the Dems have the votes in the
> > House.
> > > Maybe not in the Senate, but that is OK.
> All
> > > those Republicans who vote to acquit will
> have
> > to
> > > explain why it is OK to use tax money as a
> > > personal campaign slush fund. That will
> > suffice.
> >
> >
> > Where have we all heard this before lol.....
>
> You will hear about it a lot more. Trial in the
> Senate early next year.


Can't wait. Ciaramella will be called. Schiff will be called. Hunter Biden will be called. Oh, it's going to be quite the scene.

might actually watch that Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Get used to it Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > sure skippy Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Money is no object Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > Red Dawn Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > Can't judge a horse Wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----
> > > > > > Trumpers Hate the Truth Wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----
> > > > > > > Trump is going to be impeached.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Once again the only defense Trumpers
> > have
> > > > is
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > insult the people telling the truth.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This impeachment is meaningless. Even
> > > Pelosi
> > > > > said
> > > > > > she should only impeach if she has
> broad
> > > > > > bipartisan support. She doesn't have
> > that.
> > >
> > > > > And
> > > > > > I'm not convinced she even has enough
> > > > democrat
> > > > > > votes.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > GOP just released a $7 million ad
> campaign
> > in
> > > > > House districts that Trump won that has a
> > dem
> > > > rep.
> > > > > Wonder if that CIA bitch Spanberger is
> > going
> > > > to
> > > > > get hit with these. She's towed the
> Pelosi
> > > > line
> > > > > for a year and half.
> > > >
> > > > Dems will spend every bit as much as Trump.
>
> > > And
> > > > the ads won't cost much to make. All they
> > have
> > > to
> > > > do is pull out all Trump sound bites (such
> as
> > > the
> > > > one about NK no longer being a nuclear
> > threat).
> > >
> > > > The scripts of the ads will write
> themselves.
> > > >
> > > > After today, the Dems have the votes in the
> > > House.
> > > > Maybe not in the Senate, but that is OK.
> > All
> > > > those Republicans who vote to acquit will
> > have
> > > to
> > > > explain why it is OK to use tax money as a
> > > > personal campaign slush fund. That will
> > > suffice.
> > >
> > >
> > > Where have we all heard this before lol.....
> >
> > You will hear about it a lot more. Trial in
> the
> > Senate early next year.
>
>
> Can't wait. Ciaramella will be called. Schiff
> will be called. Hunter Biden will be called. Oh,
> it's going to be quite the scene.

Can't wait. Enjoy the show.

Rush Limbaugh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Vindman, by working with Adam Shiffy WITHOUT ORDER
> TO DO SO OR LEAVE, was in-subordinate to Trump
> (his commander in chief) and other upper staff.
>
> Like other arrested for similar acts, he rattled
> off his mouth about OFFICIAL BUSINESS of the
> President for political gain. Infact Vindman was
> PAID for his service of Ukraine strategic
> relations during "the phone call" (which contains
> no crimes): so it is CERTAINLY his duty moreso
> than any other member of the military to follow
> chain of command respecting that call: a call
> which was a nothing-burger.
>
> HIS CAREER? NOW IN THE DRAIN.
>
> Vindman btw is a Ukraine national - was not born
> in USA.


He testified that he was so chummy with the previous Ukainian regime that they offered him the opportunity to head their military. 3 times. WTF? Who offers an overweight Lt. Col with almost no discernible military skills the opportunity to lead their nation's armed forces? That's whacked.

We agree Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> might actually watch that Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Get used to it Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > sure skippy Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > Money is no object Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > Red Dawn Wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----
> > > > > > Can't judge a horse Wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----
> > > > > > > Trumpers Hate the Truth Wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > -----
> > > > > > > > Trump is going to be impeached.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Once again the only defense
> Trumpers
> > > have
> > > > > is
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > insult the people telling the
> truth.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This impeachment is meaningless.
> Even
> > > > Pelosi
> > > > > > said
> > > > > > > she should only impeach if she has
> > broad
> > > > > > > bipartisan support. She doesn't have
> > > that.
> > > >
> > > > > > And
> > > > > > > I'm not convinced she even has enough
> > > > > democrat
> > > > > > > votes.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > GOP just released a $7 million ad
> > campaign
> > > in
> > > > > > House districts that Trump won that has
> a
> > > dem
> > > > > rep.
> > > > > > Wonder if that CIA bitch Spanberger is
> > > going
> > > > > to
> > > > > > get hit with these. She's towed the
> > Pelosi
> > > > > line
> > > > > > for a year and half.
> > > > >
> > > > > Dems will spend every bit as much as
> Trump.
> >
> > > > And
> > > > > the ads won't cost much to make. All
> they
> > > have
> > > > to
> > > > > do is pull out all Trump sound bites
> (such
> > as
> > > > the
> > > > > one about NK no longer being a nuclear
> > > threat).
> > > >
> > > > > The scripts of the ads will write
> > themselves.
> > > > >
> > > > > After today, the Dems have the votes in
> the
> > > > House.
> > > > > Maybe not in the Senate, but that is OK.
>
> > > All
> > > > > those Republicans who vote to acquit will
> > > have
> > > > to
> > > > > explain why it is OK to use tax money as
> a
> > > > > personal campaign slush fund. That will
> > > > suffice.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Where have we all heard this before
> lol.....
> > >
> > > You will hear about it a lot more. Trial in
> > the
> > > Senate early next year.
> >
> >
> > Can't wait. Ciaramella will be called. Schiff
> > will be called. Hunter Biden will be called.
> Oh,
> > it's going to be quite the scene.
>
> Can't wait. Enjoy the show.


Nice. You waited two whole minutes to reply. Must be hitting that refresh button like crazy. Yeah, you're not triggered cornpop.

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> But I wouldn't bother attacking Vindman on the
> internet. Looks like the U.S. Army has his back
> and would fuck you degenerate traitors up.
Attachments:

Damn it's almost December. We're gonna throw these scumbags out of office and into prison soon.

I heard the fbi is planning to talk to the "whistleblower". Wonder if Vindman committed a crime by leaking to the wb. And what about Schiff?

Hope this ugly, fat fuck gets charged with treason. So he got a boo boo overseas..so what?
He lied..prosecute him

Find an seems like an arrogant self important asshole. No doubt that he is the one who cooked this whole farce up with the help of his friends in the deep state.