“The lawyer for the Whistleblower takes away all credibility from this big Impeachment Scam!” Trump tweeted. “It should be ended and the Whistleblower, his lawyer and Corrupt politician Schiff should be investigared for fraud!” (Trump misspelled investigated.)

Libtardss are so libtardedly libertarded.

who cares if the Greatest President ever doesn't know the exact word for it.

He is President so he can do whatever he wants.

What does the constitution say about the matter? Does Trump not have a right to face his accuser?

It also doesn't help that the alleged whistleblower has ties to the CIA, an organization that's been going after Trump since he was elected.

What the Democrats are doing now sets a BAD precedent. The Republicans are going to start pulling this shit the next time a Dem is president.

The shit the whistleblower said has been corroborated. Attacking the whistleblower is not going to change that.

It has worked before.

The OJ Simpson defense decided to go after Mark Furman for using 'nigger' instead of fighting the DNA evidence.

He got off scot-free!

Not about Trump Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What does the constitution say about the matter?
> Does Trump not have a right to face his accuser?
>
> It also doesn't help that the alleged
> whistleblower has ties to the CIA, an organization
> that's been going after Trump since he was
> elected.
>
> What the Democrats are doing now sets a BAD
> precedent. The Republicans are going to start
> pulling this shit the next time a Dem is
> president.

Now Trump wants 'due process' funny because the reason he wasnt indicted by Mueller was because he wasnt subject to due process. Now, what is funny is yes, he will get to face his accuser in the Senate trial. The prosecution could dismiss everything the whistleblower did or said - its now moot. The concerns the whistle blower brought up in exactly the proper way have been corroborated by many including the President himself. Matter of fact Trump 'faces his accuser' every morning he spends 3 hours doing his hairdo in the mirror.

What we learned from OJ Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The shit the whistleblower said has been
> corroborated. Attacking the whistleblower is not
> going to change that.
>
> It has worked before.
>
> The OJ Simpson defense decided to go after Mark
> Furman for using 'nigger' instead of fighting the
> DNA evidence.
>
> He got off scot-free!


That’s not why he got off, the gloves didn’t fit!

OJ is innocent Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What we learned from OJ Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > The shit the whistleblower said has been
> > corroborated. Attacking the whistleblower is
> not
> > going to change that.
> >
> > It has worked before.
> >
> > The OJ Simpson defense decided to go after Mark
> > Furman for using 'nigger' instead of fighting
> the
> > DNA evidence.
> >
> > He got off scot-free!
>
>
> That’s not why he got off, the gloves didn’t
> fit!


I did a paper om the trial in college. Watch the clip. OJ made it look like the glove didn't fit.

Watch the clip Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> OJ is innocent Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > What we learned from OJ Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > The shit the whistleblower said has been
> > > corroborated. Attacking the whistleblower is
> > not
> > > going to change that.
> > >
> > > It has worked before.
> > >
> > > The OJ Simpson defense decided to go after
> Mark
> > > Furman for using 'nigger' instead of fighting
> > the
> > > DNA evidence.
> > >
> > > He got off scot-free!
> >
> >
> > That’s not why he got off, the gloves
> didn’t
> > fit!
>
>
> I did a paper om the trial in college. Watch the
> clip. OJ made it look like the glove didn't fit.


The scene of his fucking life set him free!
He should’ve won a Grammy for that

They should investigate the whistleblower, he is a CIA operative. He was also responsible for the alleged evidence that Trump colluded with the Russians.

Eric Ciaralla Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> They should investigate the whistleblower, he is a
> CIA operative. He was also responsible for the
> alleged evidence that Trump colluded with the
> Russians.


In law there is a saying 'the truth is an absolute defense.' As we now know that what the whistle blower reported has been admitted to by Trump it wouldnt matter if the whistle blower was Hunter Biden himself.

k

fruit of a poison crotch Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Eric Ciaralla Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > They should investigate the whistleblower, he is
> a
> > CIA operative. He was also responsible for the
> > alleged evidence that Trump colluded with the
> > Russians.
>
>
> In law there is a saying 'the truth is an absolute
> defense.' As we now know that what the whistle
> blower reported has been admitted to by Trump it
> wouldnt matter if the whistle blower was Hunter
> Biden himself.


Sure it does because the 'whistleblower' distorted the truth originally. As did Schiff. And he's not a 'whistleblower' under the standards to begin with.

Here's the truth Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> fruit of a poison crotch Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Eric Ciaralla Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > They should investigate the whistleblower, he
> is
> > a
> > > CIA operative. He was also responsible for
> the
> > > alleged evidence that Trump colluded with the
> > > Russians.
> >
> >
> > In law there is a saying 'the truth is an
> absolute
> > defense.' As we now know that what the whistle
> > blower reported has been admitted to by Trump
> it
> > wouldnt matter if the whistle blower was Hunter
> > Biden himself.
>
>
> Sure it does because the 'whistleblower' distorted
> the truth originally. As did Schiff. And he's
> not a 'whistleblower' under the standards to begin
> with.
>
>
> src="https://www.canyon-news.com/wp-content/upload
> s/2019/11/Whistleblower-Exposed.jpg">

The whistleblower just reported that he thought Trump was blackmailing Ukraine and that he felt that many were concerned. That the call needed further review.

We are learning that the whistleblower was correct. So correct that Trump is now saying that whistleblower knew too many accurate details.

Fake Trump Call Transcript Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Here's the truth Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > fruit of a poison crotch Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Eric Ciaralla Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > They should investigate the whistleblower,
> he
> > is
> > > a
> > > > CIA operative. He was also responsible for
> > the
> > > > alleged evidence that Trump colluded with
> the
> > > > Russians.
> > >
> > >
> > > In law there is a saying 'the truth is an
> > absolute
> > > defense.' As we now know that what the
> whistle
> > > blower reported has been admitted to by Trump
> > it
> > > wouldnt matter if the whistle blower was
> Hunter
> > > Biden himself.
> >
> >
> > Sure it does because the 'whistleblower'
> distorted
> > the truth originally. As did Schiff. And he's
> > not a 'whistleblower' under the standards to
> begin
> > with.
> >
> >
> > >
> src="https://www.canyon-news.com/wp-content/upload
>
> > s/2019/11/Whistleblower-Exposed.jpg">
>
> The whistleblower just reported that he thought
> Trump was blackmailing Ukraine and that he felt
> that many were concerned. That the call needed
> further review.
>
> We are learning that the whistleblower was
> correct. So correct that Trump is now saying that
> whistleblower knew too many accurate details.


False. The "whistleblower" actively coordinated with Schiff's staff (who he previously worked with) and others to create a narrative around the call and to use it as the basis for an impeachment proceeding. If you read the complaint, that's very clear.

In fact, there was no blackmail. In fact, Zelensky was the one who brought up corruption investigations.

And, worse yet, of course this basically proves out the "Deep State" 'conspiracy' against Trump and that this is just a continuation of the impeachment looking for an excuse that started when he was elected.

#resist <--- remember that? lol

The whistleblower said he felt Trump was blackmailing Ukraine and that is should be investigated. Sorry if that upsets you.

Trump asking Ukraine to investigate Bidens son is just wrong.

Whistleblower Was Correct Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The whistleblower said he felt Trump was
> blackmailing Ukraine and that is should be
> investigated. Sorry if that upsets you.


The "whistleblower" is BS on its face and an obviously coordinated attempt by hyper-partisan operatives to, yet again, try to discredit Trump and to serve as the basis for impeachment. Which has been happening in since the shock and awe of his election. Sorry if reality upsets you.

#RussiansRussiansRussians <--- remember that one? lol

Why doesn't Trump just pay them off like Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal and get them to sign an NDA?

Meuller isn't busy. Trump should appoint him as a special prosecutor.

Wouldn't it be easier for Trump to demand the military arrest and lock them up?