why was the guy in charge of CrowdStrike a former FBI official who was close to and put in charge of cyber-security at the FBI by one Robert Mueller?

Why so the same two names keep popping up everywhere when it comes to investigating the Clintons (Mueller & Comey) over two-and-a-half decades of investigations?

Why do the same names come up when it comes to investigating Trump (Mueller, Comey, Strozk, McCabe)?

Why does the media not look into any of this and is actually covering all this up? Chuck Todd actually got angry because someone said the Bidens needed to be investigated, saying that case is closed. What the actual fuck?

Trump is a threat to the business as usual that the Uniparty bureaucrats and LE/FBI/CIA have had a monopoly on. Not necessarily because Trump is so honest and wants to "drain the swamp", he may just want a piece of the swamp for himself.

Either way, it stirs up the pot. All of the lifelong relationships and secret deals are in jeopardy. And the fact that a political novice was elected means another political novice may be able to do the same.

I don't like the term "Deep State" because of it's conspiratorial sound, but it is accurate. Their best hope, and it was a true Hail Mary, was to shake the trees with the Steele Dossier and hope something damning would emerge from elsewhere. If they had pinned a good scandal on Trump early in 2017, they may have been able to nip it all in the bud. Instead, the economy soared and Trump proved political experience is not needed if you delegate authority well enough.

Now the Dems and opposition want to push the narrative that Trump is more hassle than he is worth and hope independent voters will move left. But they've tried hard and no one cares about Stormy Daniels or the other boring "scandals" they have tried to raise.

And, not many people on the right, left or center really trust the CIA and intel community much after they botched 9/11 and the Iraq WMD debacle.

I don't agree with Trumps personal style, but his policies appear to be working and he has resisted the temptation to go to war. Not so sure Hillary would have done the same.

It's always the same at the core...

 
Attachments:

Kennedy knew all about the CIA (and they killed him for sounding the alarm):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S5563viRC2w


Truman, who created the CIA, also knew what a mistake that turned out to be:

“This quiet intelligence arm of the President has been so removed from its intended role that it is being interpreted as a symbol of sinister and mysterious foreign intrigue—and subject for cold war enemy propaganda" Harry S. Truman, 12/22/1963, Washington Post Op Ed (one month after Kennedy was killed in a crossfire in Dallas)

Trump better watch out for these guys. As Chuck Schumer warned Trump about watching his step trying to clean up the CIA. "They have 6 ways to Sunday" to get back at you Chuckie said two weeks before Trump took office.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XCtIdpBocNA

Dems are OK with all of this because orange man bad. Fucking traitorous motherfuckers.

Whenever someone, regardless of socio-economic status tries to take on entities like the CIA, it always works out bad for them. One should not poke out their own eyes to spite their face. Trump’s is the author of his own impeachment.

Vxhn Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Whenever someone, regardless of socio-economic
> status tries to take on entities like the CIA, it
> always works out bad for them. One should not poke
> out their own eyes to spite their face. Trump’s
> is the author of his own impeachment.


Wut? The CIA is the all powerful entity that rules us all? That is majorly fucked up if true. They need to be dismantled and we need another run at this then.

A couple more questions that i have ask....

Why did the CIA change their whistle blower rules to allow 2nd and 3rd hand knowledge within the bounds of whistle blower protection? What could go wrong? Anyone can tell anyone that they heard anything and that person can now anonymously report anything they want.

Why did Adam Schiff travel to Ukraine 10 days after the whistle blower file his complaint?

Why did Adam Schiff tweet that Trump was working with the Ukrainian government to spy on Joe biden two weeks before congress was notified that a whistle blower had reported the incident to the acting DNI director?

USA v CIA Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Vxhn Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Whenever someone, regardless of socio-economic
> > status tries to take on entities like the CIA,
> it
> > always works out bad for them. One should not
> poke
> > out their own eyes to spite their face.
> Trump’s
> > is the author of his own impeachment.
>
>
> Wut? The CIA is the all powerful entity that
> rules us all? That is majorly fucked up if true.
> They need to be dismantled and we need another run
> at this then.

No, they are just doing their jobs protecting us.

stinky  Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> A couple more questions that i have ask....
>
> Why did the CIA change their whistle blower rules
> to allow 2nd and 3rd hand knowledge within the
> bounds of whistle blower protection? What could
> go wrong? Anyone can tell anyone that they heard
> anything and that person can now anonymously
> report anything they want.
>
> Why did Adam Schiff travel to Ukraine 10 days
> after the whistle blower file his complaint?
>
> Why did Adam Schiff tweet that Trump was working
> with the Ukrainian government to spy on Joe biden
> two weeks before congress was notified that a
> whistle blower had reported the incident to the
> acting DNI director?

It's obviously politically motivated. I doubt the Democrats would have wanted this policy while they had the White House, Obama definitely would have been impeached.

The trick now is to change the policy back without the public noticing. Have to protect your guy when they get the power back.

WHY DON'T YOU REVIEW SOME VA STATE OR FEDERAL SPENDING LAWS AND REPORT TO US ANY MIS-APPROPRIATED MONEY

instead of bashing trump?

why is because your a foreign terrorist who lies on ffu continuously - paid by democrats to do it

America is getting scammed Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> stinky  Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > A couple more questions that i have ask....
> >
> > Why did the CIA change their whistle blower
> rules
> > to allow 2nd and 3rd hand knowledge within the
> > bounds of whistle blower protection? What
> could
> > go wrong? Anyone can tell anyone that they
> heard
> > anything and that person can now anonymously
> > report anything they want.
> >
> > Why did Adam Schiff travel to Ukraine 10 days
> > after the whistle blower file his complaint?
> >
> > Why did Adam Schiff tweet that Trump was
> working
> > with the Ukrainian government to spy on Joe
> biden
> > two weeks before congress was notified that a
> > whistle blower had reported the incident to the
> > acting DNI director?
>
> It's obviously politically motivated. I doubt the
> Democrats would have wanted this policy while they
> had the White House, Obama definitely would have
> been impeached.
>
> The trick now is to change the policy back without
> the public noticing. Have to protect your guy when
> they get the power back.


There is no more nobody noticing anymore. The intel agencies (and FBI) have become so politicized that someone is going to tell the press about it, no matter whether it's a lib or con doing it.

Big brother protects us Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> USA v CIA Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------

> > Wut? The CIA is the all powerful entity that
> > rules us all? That is majorly fucked up if
> true.
> > They need to be dismantled and we need another
> run
> > at this then.
>
> No, they are just doing their jobs protecting us.


 
Attachments:

Just a few more questions if you don't mind.

Why was Adam Schiff going to Ukraine on the 22nd of August for a conference of the Atlantic Council (a shadowy globalist business group)?

Why did he cancel and send an aide instead at the last minute - after Jerry Nadler told him that it would look inappropriate for him to go 'at this time'?

Why are both the founder of CrowdStrike and James Clapper on the advisory board of the Atlantic Council?

Why did Burmisa (the Ukrainian energy company Biden's son was bribed by) form a business partnership with the Atlantic Council 3 days before Trump took office and 2 months of Ukraine dropped all investigations into the company?

Anyone know the answer to any of the questions that have been asked. So far, crickets.

It's all coming out in the wash Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Just a few more questions if you don't mind.
>
> Why was Adam Schiff going to Ukraine on the 22nd
> of August for a conference of the Atlantic Council
> (a shadowy globalist business group)?
>
> Why did he cancel and send an aide instead at the
> last minute - after Jerry Nadler told him that it
> would look inappropriate for him to go 'at this
> time'?
>
> Why are both the founder of CrowdStrike and James
> Clapper on the advisory board of the Atlantic
> Council?
>
> Why did Burmisa (the Ukrainian energy company
> Biden's son was bribed by) form a business
> partnership with the Atlantic Council 3 days
> before Trump took office and 2 months of Ukraine
> dropped all investigations into the company?
>
> Anyone know the answer to any of the questions
> that have been asked. So far, crickets.

Two words: George Soros!!!

Damn, these intel guys are getting lazy. The used to pull this stuff off without anyone ever pushing back or even knowing what happened. Changing the rules of whistleblower protection status would have sailed by quietly in the night without anyone ever knowing about it. Schiff tweeting knowledge of an event a month before it supposedly would have been sent to him would have been covered up and deleted immediately. Global business groups with ties to all the players would never even be acknowledged as exiting, much less publish their ties on their own websites.

Too cocky. And it will save Trump in the end.

Conspiracy theories are for losers. Literal losers.

more losing effort for trumptard Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Conspiracy theories are for losers. Literal
> losers. I can't answer your questions so I'll
> call you names instead.


FIFY

A couple more questions have sprung up. Thanks for any answers.

Why did Nancy Pelosi say on 60 Minutes last night that she already knew what was in the Trump/Zelensky phone call before the transcript was released? She stammered like the retard she is when she realized how she just fucked up.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1178626571013431296

Why did a spokesperson for the DNI tell Tom Elliot of The Federalist that, "We have no comment on the president's call with the president of Ukraine." when asked who changed the requirement for whistle blower protection from 'direct knowledge' to hearsay and when the change was made? Elliot never mentioned Trump or the phone call.

If someone knows the answer to this one, please weigh in.

Why did the chair of the House Intelligence Committee (Adam Schiff) send two committee staff to the Ukraine in mid-August to meet with the former president of the Ukraine, who had recently lost his reelection bid to an outsider with no political experience or ties?

A quick reply to this question would be appreciated.

Why was everyone OK with the previous administration actively destabilizing a country, leading to the death of that country's leader and creating a terrorist haven that ended up costing the lives of our ambassador and several CIA operatives but is having a meltdown that Trump asked another country to look into corruption that occurred in that previous administration?

Does this make sense Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> A quick reply to this question would be
> appreciated.
>
> Why was everyone OK with the previous
> administration actively destabilizing a country,
> leading to the death of that country's leader and
> creating a terrorist haven that ended up costing
> the lives of our ambassador and several CIA
> operatives but is having a meltdown that Trump
> asked another country to look into corruption that
> occurred in that previous administration?

Answer: when all else fails, play the strawman card

trailer park treason Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Does this make sense Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > A quick reply to this question would be
> > appreciated.
> >
> > Why was everyone OK with the previous
> > administration actively destabilizing a
> country,
> > leading to the death of that country's leader
> and
> > creating a terrorist haven that ended up
> costing
> > the lives of our ambassador and several CIA
> > operatives but is having a meltdown that Trump
> > asked another country to look into corruption
> that
> > occurred in that previous administration?
>
> Answer: when all else fails, play the strawman
> card


Another non-answer. So far, not one. Figures.

don't hate on the messenger Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> trailer park treason Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Does this make sense Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > A quick reply to this question would be
> > > appreciated.
> > >
> > > Why was everyone OK with the previous
> > > administration actively destabilizing a
> > country,
> > > leading to the death of that country's leader
> > and
> > > creating a terrorist haven that ended up
> > costing
> > > the lives of our ambassador and several CIA
> > > operatives but is having a meltdown that
> Trump
> > > asked another country to look into corruption
> > that
> > > occurred in that previous administration?
> >
> > Answer: when all else fails, play the strawman
> > card
>
>
> Another non-answer. So far, not one. Figures.


Mouth breather. I would claim you were a Russian Troll, but they have better written communication skills than you.


Now, the conspiracy is with Trump, Bill Barr, Rudy and Joe Degenova. Read the following


On Sunday, Fox News' Chris Wallace revealed WMAL commentator Joe DiGenova an his wife were helping Giuliani in the Ukraine to try and manufacture dirt on Joe Biden. Giuliani was not working alone, Wallace said. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/giuliani-was-not-working-alone-in-biden-ukraine-probe This morning,on WMAL, Joe trashed that report, minimizing it, and saying he was asked by the White House to represent a "whistle blower" in Ukraine. But, Joe continued, he never went to the country because his trip was cancelled. So, he really wasn't that involved. Joe forgot to mention he was, in fact, hired in the past week or so to represent in the United States a Ukrainian natural gas tycoon, Victor Firtash, who is fighting extradition to the US for bribery and fraud. Virtash was recently hyped up by the former and corrupt prosecutor in Ukraine, Viktor Shokin, who is at the center of the this Biden controversy. https://www.kyivpost.com/ukraine-politics/ex-prosecutor-general-shokin-defends-oligarch-firtash.html If the United States Department of Justice wants to extradite and put on trial on corruption charges, here, Victor Firtash, why is WMAL's Joe DiGenova not only working to keep this guy out of our country and away from our legal system, but also, working with him to build a case against Biden, sidestepping any Justice department, State Department, or Congressional input and protocol? DiGenova should have revealed his contract with Ukraine's Firtash, and Vince and Mary should have asked him why he is working on two different angles to avoid the Justice Department.

Damarris Fuques Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> don't hate on the messenger Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > trailer park treason Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Does this make sense Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > A quick reply to this question would be
> > > > appreciated.
> > > >
> > > > Why was everyone OK with the previous
> > > > administration actively destabilizing a
> > > country,
> > > > leading to the death of that country's
> leader
> > > and
> > > > creating a terrorist haven that ended up
> > > costing
> > > > the lives of our ambassador and several CIA
> > > > operatives but is having a meltdown that
> > Trump
> > > > asked another country to look into
> corruption
> > > that
> > > > occurred in that previous administration?
> > >
> > > Answer: when all else fails, play the
> strawman
> > > card
> >
> >
> > Another non-answer. So far, not one. Figures.
>
>
> Mouth breather. I would claim you were a Russian
> Troll, but they have better written communication
> skills than you.
>
>
> Now, the conspiracy is with Trump, Bill Barr, Rudy
> and Joe Degenova. Read the following
>
>
> On Sunday, Fox News' Chris Wallace revealed WMAL
> commentator Joe DiGenova an his wife were helping
> Giuliani in the Ukraine to try and manufacture
> dirt on Joe Biden. Giuliani was not working
> alone, Wallace said.
> https://www.foxnews.com/politics/giuliani-was-not-
> working-alone-in-biden-ukraine-probe This
> morning,on WMAL, Joe trashed that report,
> minimizing it, and saying he was asked by the
> White House to represent a "whistle blower" in
> Ukraine. But, Joe continued, he never went to the
> country because his trip was cancelled. So, he
> really wasn't that involved. Joe forgot to
> mention he was, in fact, hired in the past week or
> so to represent in the United States a Ukrainian
> natural gas tycoon, Victor Firtash, who is
> fighting extradition to the US for bribery and
> fraud. Virtash was recently hyped up by the
> former and corrupt prosecutor in Ukraine, Viktor
> Shokin, who is at the center of the this Biden
> controversy.
> https://www.kyivpost.com/ukraine-politics/ex-prose
> cutor-general-shokin-defends-oligarch-firtash.html
> If the United States Department of Justice
> wants to extradite and put on trial on corruption
> charges, here, Victor Firtash, why is WMAL's Joe
> DiGenova not only working to keep this guy out of
> our country and away from our legal system, but
> also, working with him to build a case against
> Biden, sidestepping any Justice department, State
> Department, or Congressional input and protocol?
> DiGenova should have revealed his contract with
> Ukraine's Firtash, and Vince and Mary should have
> asked him why he is working on two different
> angles to avoid the Justice Department.


Sure cupcake. The prosecutor is corrupt because the people he was investigating say so. No evidence is ever presented to show this corruption. Just the word of the previous leaders of the Ukraine, who were corrupt as shit and in bed with the Bidens and Ukrainian and Putin oligarchs. Fool!

Damarris Fuques Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> don't hate on the messenger Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > trailer park treason Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Does this make sense Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > A quick reply to this question would be
> > > > appreciated.
> > > >
> > > > Why was everyone OK with the previous
> > > > administration actively destabilizing a
> > > country,
> > > > leading to the death of that country's
> leader
> > > and
> > > > creating a terrorist haven that ended up
> > > costing
> > > > the lives of our ambassador and several CIA
> > > > operatives but is having a meltdown that
> > Trump
> > > > asked another country to look into
> corruption
> > > that
> > > > occurred in that previous administration?
> > >
> > > Answer: when all else fails, play the
> strawman
> > > card
> >
> >
> > Another non-answer. So far, not one. Figures.
>
>
> Mouth breather. I would claim you were a Russian
> Troll, but they have better written communication
> skills than you.
>
>
> Now, the conspiracy is with Trump, Bill Barr, Rudy
> and Joe Degenova. Read the following
>
>
> On Sunday, Fox News' Chris Wallace revealed WMAL
> commentator Joe DiGenova an his wife were helping
> Giuliani in the Ukraine to try and manufacture
> dirt on Joe Biden. Giuliani was not working
> alone, Wallace said.
> https://www.foxnews.com/politics/giuliani-was-not-
> working-alone-in-biden-ukraine-probe This
> morning,on WMAL, Joe trashed that report,
> minimizing it, and saying he was asked by the
> White House to represent a "whistle blower" in
> Ukraine. But, Joe continued, he never went to the
> country because his trip was cancelled. So, he
> really wasn't that involved. Joe forgot to
> mention he was, in fact, hired in the past week or
> so to represent in the United States a Ukrainian
> natural gas tycoon, Victor Firtash, who is
> fighting extradition to the US for bribery and
> fraud. Virtash was recently hyped up by the
> former and corrupt prosecutor in Ukraine, Viktor
> Shokin, who is at the center of the this Biden
> controversy.
> https://www.kyivpost.com/ukraine-politics/ex-prose
> cutor-general-shokin-defends-oligarch-firtash.html
> If the United States Department of Justice
> wants to extradite and put on trial on corruption
> charges, here, Victor Firtash, why is WMAL's Joe
> DiGenova not only working to keep this guy out of
> our country and away from our legal system, but
> also, working with him to build a case against
> Biden, sidestepping any Justice department, State
> Department, or Congressional input and protocol?
> DiGenova should have revealed his contract with
> Ukraine's Firtash, and Vince and Mary should have
> asked him why he is working on two different
> angles to avoid the Justice Department.


Wow, that brain-vomit is really connect the dots there. lol


 
Attachments:

Does this make sense Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> A quick reply to this question would be
> appreciated.
>
> Why was everyone OK with the previous
> administration actively destabilizing a country,
> leading to the death of that country's leader and
> creating a terrorist haven that ended up costing
> the lives of our ambassador and several CIA
> operatives but is having a meltdown that Trump
> asked another country to look into corruption that
> occurred in that previous administration?


But what about Hillary’s emails and George Soros?

Just a quick question here.

Why is it OK for three US senators to write a letter to the president of Ukraine, explicitly threatening to withhold support for his country unless his government cooperates with the Mueller probe? Isn't that "treason"?

Bore Us More Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Damarris Fuques Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > don't hate on the messenger Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > trailer park treason Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > Does this make sense Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > A quick reply to this question would be
> > > > > appreciated.
> > > > >
> > > > > Why was everyone OK with the previous
> > > > > administration actively destabilizing a
> > > > country,
> > > > > leading to the death of that country's
> > leader
> > > > and
> > > > > creating a terrorist haven that ended up
> > > > costing
> > > > > the lives of our ambassador and several
> CIA
> > > > > operatives but is having a meltdown that
> > > Trump
> > > > > asked another country to look into
> > corruption
> > > > that
> > > > > occurred in that previous administration?
> > > >
> > > > Answer: when all else fails, play the
> > strawman
> > > > card
> > >
> > >
> > > Another non-answer. So far, not one.
> Figures.
> >
> >
> > Mouth breather. I would claim you were a
> Russian
> > Troll, but they have better written
> communication
> > skills than you.
> >
> >
> > Now, the conspiracy is with Trump, Bill Barr,
> Rudy
> > and Joe Degenova. Read the following
> >
> >
> > On Sunday, Fox News' Chris Wallace revealed
> WMAL
> > commentator Joe DiGenova an his wife were
> helping
> > Giuliani in the Ukraine to try and manufacture
> > dirt on Joe Biden. Giuliani was not working
> > alone, Wallace said.
> >
> https://www.foxnews.com/politics/giuliani-was-not-
>
> > working-alone-in-biden-ukraine-probe This
> > morning,on WMAL, Joe trashed that report,
> > minimizing it, and saying he was asked by the
> > White House to represent a "whistle blower" in
> > Ukraine. But, Joe continued, he never went to
> the
> > country because his trip was cancelled. So,
> he
> > really wasn't that involved. Joe forgot to
> > mention he was, in fact, hired in the past week
> or
> > so to represent in the United States a
> Ukrainian
> > natural gas tycoon, Victor Firtash, who is
> > fighting extradition to the US for bribery and
> > fraud. Virtash was recently hyped up by the
> > former and corrupt prosecutor in Ukraine,
> Viktor
> > Shokin, who is at the center of the this Biden
> > controversy.
> >
> https://www.kyivpost.com/ukraine-politics/ex-prose
>
> >
> cutor-general-shokin-defends-oligarch-firtash.html
>
> > If the United States Department of Justice
> > wants to extradite and put on trial on
> corruption
> > charges, here, Victor Firtash, why is WMAL's
> Joe
> > DiGenova not only working to keep this guy out
> of
> > our country and away from our legal system,
> but
> > also, working with him to build a case against
> > Biden, sidestepping any Justice department,
> State
> > Department, or Congressional input and protocol?
>
> > DiGenova should have revealed his contract
> with
> > Ukraine's Firtash, and Vince and Mary should
> have
> > asked him why he is working on two different
> > angles to avoid the Justice Department.
>
>
> Sure cupcake. The prosecutor is corrupt because
> the people he was investigating say so. No
> evidence is ever presented to show this
> corruption. Just the word of the previous leaders
> of the Ukraine, who were corrupt as shit and in
> bed with the Bidens and Ukrainian and Putin
> oligarchs. Fool!

At the time, the following organizations wanted Shokin out because of his corruption

The United States Department of State.
NATO
The European Union
International Monetary Fund
The United Kingdom Parliament


Quote
No
> evidence is ever presented to show this
> corruption.



As Bloomberg News pointed out in May,The specifics of Shokin's corruption are most obvious in what he did not do. Shokin was particularly opposed to investigating high-wealth individuals suspected of corruption. Why those individuals? Presumably because a little of their high wealth would find its way into Shokin's hands if he was able to make their problems go away. This obviously infuriated civil society activists who noticed that Shokin was stonewalling obvious investigative needs."

At about the same time, In February 2016, International Monetary Fund Managing Director Christine Lagarde threatened to withhold $40 billion from Ukraine unless Ukraine undertook “a substantial new effort” to fight corruption after the country’s economic minister and his team resigned to protest government corruption. That same month, a “reform-minded deputy prosecutor resigned, complaining that his efforts to address government corruption had been consistently stymied by his own prosecutor general, Viktor Shokin,” according to a Jan. 3, 2017, Congressional Research Services report.


Do you recall, Shokin served as prosecutor general under Viktor Yanukovych, the former president of Ukraine who fled to Russia after he was removed from power in 2014 and was later found guilty of treason? Shokin remained in power after Yanukovych’s ouster, but Shokin failed “to indict any major figures from the Yanukovych administration for corruption,” according to testimony John E. Herbst, a former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine under President George W. Bush, gave in March 2016 to a subcommittee of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.


So, what the hell are you talking about?

woody the Carpenter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Bore Us More Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Damarris Fuques Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > don't hate on the messenger Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > trailer park treason Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > Does this make sense Wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----
> > > > > > A quick reply to this question would be
> > > > > > appreciated.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Why was everyone OK with the previous
> > > > > > administration actively destabilizing a
> > > > > country,
> > > > > > leading to the death of that country's
> > > leader
> > > > > and
> > > > > > creating a terrorist haven that ended
> up
> > > > > costing
> > > > > > the lives of our ambassador and several
> > CIA
> > > > > > operatives but is having a meltdown
> that
> > > > Trump
> > > > > > asked another country to look into
> > > corruption
> > > > > that
> > > > > > occurred in that previous
> administration?
> > > > >
> > > > > Answer: when all else fails, play the
> > > strawman
> > > > > card
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Another non-answer. So far, not one.
> > Figures.
> > >
> > >
> > > Mouth breather. I would claim you were a
> > Russian
> > > Troll, but they have better written
> > communication
> > > skills than you.
> > >
> > >
> > > Now, the conspiracy is with Trump, Bill Barr,
> > Rudy
> > > and Joe Degenova. Read the following
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sunday, Fox News' Chris Wallace revealed
> > WMAL
> > > commentator Joe DiGenova an his wife were
> > helping
> > > Giuliani in the Ukraine to try and
> manufacture
> > > dirt on Joe Biden. Giuliani was not working
> > > alone, Wallace said.
> > >
> >
> https://www.foxnews.com/politics/giuliani-was-not-
>
> >
> > > working-alone-in-biden-ukraine-probe This
> > > morning,on WMAL, Joe trashed that report,
> > > minimizing it, and saying he was asked by the
> > > White House to represent a "whistle blower"
> in
> > > Ukraine. But, Joe continued, he never went
> to
> > the
> > > country because his trip was cancelled.
> So,
> > he
> > > really wasn't that involved. Joe forgot to
> > > mention he was, in fact, hired in the past
> week
> > or
> > > so to represent in the United States a
> > Ukrainian
> > > natural gas tycoon, Victor Firtash, who is
> > > fighting extradition to the US for bribery
> and
> > > fraud. Virtash was recently hyped up by the
> > > former and corrupt prosecutor in Ukraine,
> > Viktor
> > > Shokin, who is at the center of the this
> Biden
> > > controversy.
> > >
> >
> https://www.kyivpost.com/ukraine-politics/ex-prose
>
> >
> > >
> >
> cutor-general-shokin-defends-oligarch-firtash.html
>
> >
> > > If the United States Department of Justice
> > > wants to extradite and put on trial on
> > corruption
> > > charges, here, Victor Firtash, why is WMAL's
> > Joe
> > > DiGenova not only working to keep this guy
> out
> > of
> > > our country and away from our legal system,
> > but
> > > also, working with him to build a case
> against
> > > Biden, sidestepping any Justice department,
> > State
> > > Department, or Congressional input and
> protocol?
> >
> > > DiGenova should have revealed his contract
> > with
> > > Ukraine's Firtash, and Vince and Mary should
> > have
> > > asked him why he is working on two different
> > > angles to avoid the Justice Department.
> >
> >
> > Sure cupcake. The prosecutor is corrupt
> because
> > the people he was investigating say so. No
> > evidence is ever presented to show this
> > corruption. Just the word of the previous
> leaders
> > of the Ukraine, who were corrupt as shit and in
> > bed with the Bidens and Ukrainian and Putin
> > oligarchs. Fool!
>
> At the time, the following organizations wanted
> Shokin out because of his corruption
>
> The United States Department of State.
> NATO
> The European Union
> International Monetary Fund
> The United Kingdom Parliament
>
>
> Quote
> No
> > evidence is ever presented to show this
> > corruption.
>
>
>
> As Bloomberg News pointed out in May,The specifics
> of Shokin's corruption are most obvious in what he
> did not do. Shokin was particularly opposed to
> investigating high-wealth individuals suspected of
> corruption. Why those individuals? Presumably
> because a little of their high wealth would find
> its way into Shokin's hands if he was able to make
> their problems go away. This obviously infuriated
> civil society activists who noticed that Shokin
> was stonewalling obvious investigative needs."
>
> At about the same time, In February 2016,
> International Monetary Fund Managing Director
> Christine Lagarde threatened to withhold $40
> billion from Ukraine unless Ukraine undertook
> “a substantial new effort” to fight corruption
> after the country’s economic minister and his
> team resigned to protest government corruption.
> That same month, a “reform-minded deputy
> prosecutor resigned, complaining that his efforts
> to address government corruption had been
> consistently stymied by his own prosecutor
> general, Viktor Shokin,” according to a Jan. 3,
> 2017, Congressional Research Services report.
>
>
> Do you recall, Shokin served as prosecutor general
> under Viktor Yanukovych, the former president of
> Ukraine who fled to Russia after he was removed
> from power in 2014 and was later found guilty of
> treason? Shokin remained in power after
> Yanukovych’s ouster, but Shokin failed “to
> indict any major figures from the Yanukovych
> administration for corruption,” according to
> testimony John E. Herbst, a former U.S. ambassador
> to Ukraine under President George W. Bush, gave in
> March 2016 to a subcommittee of the Senate Foreign
> Relations Committee.
>
>
> So, what the hell are you talking about?


So, your 'evidence' is what this guy didn't do? OK, got it. Guess that makes every fucking Obama official guilty of corruption then. STFU dumbfuq. There is no there there. Let's see the fucking documents that prove corruption. Rudy has a 6 inch stack of receipts and sworn testimony/depositions. Per usual, you fucking libs produce 'news stories' with nothing but conclusions based on what they've been told but no facts.

Fail.

another couple of questions looking for answers to mate with.

If Trump is so corrupt, why did they have to change the whistle blower rules, finalized and new forms printed two weeks before the whistle blower reported his case, in order to make these charges?

Why didn't all those leakers who talked with the whistle blower just blow the whistle themselves? They were supposedly the ones with first hand knowledge of all this. The whistle blower said that he had five leakers tell him stuff. Is he some kind of great listener and everyone comes to him to tell him their secrets and concerns?

These questions would like an answer or two.

Why are the very institutions (CIA, FBI, DNI) that are charged with protecting our country and things like our elections the ones undermining our country and messing around in our elections?

Why are they accusing Trump of working with foreign governments to undermine political opponents based on information from unfriendly foreign intelligence agencies that they themselves were working with to undermine Trump, their political opponent?

Why did the press and the democrats have to lie about things like quid pro quo and Trump threatening aid when we can read the transcript ourselves and see that there was no threat, no mention of aid at all and no quid pro quo? Does the press and the democrats think we're all retarded and will just believe them?

Bueller? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> These questions would like an answer or two.
>
> Why are the very institutions (CIA, FBI, DNI) that
> are charged with protecting our country and things
> like our elections the ones undermining our
> country and messing around in our elections?

Answer: Hillary’s emails


> Why are they accusing Trump of working with
> foreign governments to undermine political
> opponents based on information from unfriendly
> foreign intelligence agencies that they themselves
> were working with to undermine Trump, their
> political opponent?

Answer: George Soros

> Why did the press and the democrats have to lie
> about things like quid pro quo and Trump
> threatening aid when we can read the transcript
> ourselves and see that there was no threat, no
> mention of aid at all and no quid pro quo? Does
> the press and the democrats think we're all
> retarded and will just believe them?

Answer: Benghazi!!!!

deep state scandal Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Bueller? Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > These questions would like an answer or two.
> >
> > Why are the very institutions (CIA, FBI, DNI)
> that
> > are charged with protecting our country and
> things
> > like our elections the ones undermining our
> > country and messing around in our elections?
>
> Answer: Hillary’s emails
>
>
> > Why are they accusing Trump of working with
> > foreign governments to undermine political
> > opponents based on information from unfriendly
> > foreign intelligence agencies that they
> themselves
> > were working with to undermine Trump, their
> > political opponent?
>
> Answer: George Soros
>
> > Why did the press and the democrats have to lie
> > about things like quid pro quo and Trump
> > threatening aid when we can read the transcript
> > ourselves and see that there was no threat, no
> > mention of aid at all and no quid pro quo?
> Does
> > the press and the democrats think we're all
> > retarded and will just believe them?
>
> Answer: Benghazi!!!!


So, you got nothing. That's OK. That's all anyone has to these questions. The answers are out there, but no one seems to want to admit the truth.

As the previous questions received no answers except Clinton and emails, perhaps these might be easier. TIA

Why did CrowdStrike, which was fully aligned with the DNC, have exclusive contracts with the FBI for "unspecified cyber-security services" throughout the entire time the FBI was working to spy on the Trump campaign?

Why did the FBI never demand to see the Clinton email server and instead instead rely exclusively on a report from CrowdStrike, which blamed the Russians?

Why did Admiral Mike Rogers not renew contracts with CrowdStrike after he became director of the NSA in 2014 when they came up for renewal in early 2015?

Why did, less than 3 months later, the FBI contract with CrowdStike (in the above mentioned question), during a time when the FBI was beginning to investigate the Clinton email server, of which CrowdStike was a critical entity?

These should be easy to answer.

The non-answerer on here keeps bringing up Benghazi so let's ask a couple questions about that too, since he seems to want to. Answers are appreciated.


Why was Christopher Stevens in Benghazi when every embassy and ambassador in the world, and especially in Muslim countries and doubly especially in those with no functioning central government, were told to stay behind the embassy walls as it was 9-11 and our stellar intel services had picked up increased chatter from Muslim terrorist organizations?

Why did Christopher Stevens meet with a Turkish "diplomat" in Benghazi the night of the attack? The attack occurred 3 hours after the Turk left the mission.

Why did the Obama administration blame a youtube video that has less than 200 views for the attack? Why was there never a trail for the "film maker"?

Why was the CIA annex located in Benghazi (a hub of weapon trafficking for the entire region)?

How did the Syrian rebels get their hands on manpads that had previously been in Libya?

There are at least a dozen more questions that have never been answered on Benghazi. But let's start with these. All of these are fact-based-questions btw

I too, have noticed a lack of answers to important questions that the liberal media and koolaid drinking never-trumpers avoid answering. Anyone?

If you are driving in a car at the speed of light and turn on your headlights, would the headlights work? Would they illuminate objects in your path?

Who is buried in Grant’s tomb?

What is the real meaning of Euler’s Identity? e^i(pi)-1=0

Is your refrigerator running?

There are at least a hundred more of these questions being asked by many people everyday, but no one seems to answer them. Why?

Trump scientist Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I too, have noticed a lack of answers to important
> questions that the liberal media and koolaid
> drinking never-trumpers avoid answering. Anyone?
>
> If you are driving in a car at the speed of light
> and turn on your headlights, would the headlights
> work? Would they illuminate objects in your
> path?
>
> Who is buried in Grant’s tomb?
>
> What is the real meaning of Euler’s Identity?
> e^i(pi)-1=0
>
> Is your refrigerator running?
>
> There are at least a hundred more of these
> questions being asked by many people everyday, but
> no one seems to answer them. Why?


So, still no answers then? That's OK, I have more.

Just a quick question that someone might know the answer to. Thanks

Why did the "whistle blower" submit the complaint using the older, original form but noted that the information was second hand and then the ICIG changed the form to allow 2nd hand (i.e. hearsay) and had the "whistle blower" use the newly changed form?

The ICIG has admitted all of this, so why did they do it?

Just one more question if you don't mind.

Why did the ICIG lie about never requiring direct, first-hand knowledge of an incident for the matter to be considered urgent and reportable to Congress, when the instructions on the old form, that was used up until two weeks before all of this, had the following text right on the filing instructions?

 
Attachments:

A quick question for a quick answerer.

Now that it has come out that the "whistle blower" coordinated with the staff of Adam Schiff and reached out to his office before even going to the ICIG with this complaint, does that sully the entire complaint?

questions that I ask Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> A quick question for a quick answerer.
>
> Now that it has come out that the "whistle blower"
> coordinated with the staff of Adam Schiff and
> reached out to his office before even going to the
> ICIG with this complaint, does that sully the
> entire complaint?


The fruit of a poisoned tree?

Bernie's dying Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Trump scientist Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I too, have noticed a lack of answers to
> important
> > questions that the liberal media and koolaid
> > drinking never-trumpers avoid answering.
> Anyone?
> >
> > If you are driving in a car at the speed of
> light
> > and turn on your headlights, would the
> headlights
> > work? Would they illuminate objects in your
> > path?
> >
> > Who is buried in Grant’s tomb?
> >
> > What is the real meaning of Euler’s Identity?
>
> > e^i(pi)-1=0
> >
> > Is your refrigerator running?
> >
> > There are at least a hundred more of these
> > questions being asked by many people everyday,
> but
> > no one seems to answer them. Why?
>
>
> So, still no answers then? That's OK, I have
> more.


First, there is really no such thing as the Deep State, if there were, we would have had Trump's tax return years ago.

Now I have a couple of questions


How can a "phone call" be "perfect" and "Beautiful?"
Were the buttons pressed with fine finesse?


Why do they call it "rush hour" when everything moves so slow?

M favorite Trump tweet
Attachments:

poliana Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Bernie's dying Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Trump scientist Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > I too, have noticed a lack of answers to
> > important
> > > questions that the liberal media and koolaid
> > > drinking never-trumpers avoid answering.
> > Anyone?
> > >
> > > If you are driving in a car at the speed of
> > light
> > > and turn on your headlights, would the
> > headlights
> > > work? Would they illuminate objects in your
> > > path?
> > >
> > > Who is buried in Grant’s tomb?
> > >
> > > What is the real meaning of Euler’s
> Identity?
> >
> > > e^i(pi)-1=0
> > >
> > > Is your refrigerator running?
> > >
> > > There are at least a hundred more of these
> > > questions being asked by many people
> everyday,
> > but
> > > no one seems to answer them. Why?
> >
> >
> > So, still no answers then? That's OK, I have
> > more.
>
>
> First, there is really no such thing as the Deep
> State, if there were, we would have had Trump's
> tax return years ago.
>
> Now I have a couple of questions
>
>
> How can a "phone call" be "perfect" and
> "Beautiful?"
> Were the buttons pressed with fine finesse?
>
>
> Why do they call it "rush hour" when everything
> moves so slow?
>
> M favorite Trump tweet


^ Typical easily fooled libtard.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/donald-trump-fake-tweet/

poliana Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Bernie's dying Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Trump scientist Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > I too, have noticed a lack of answers to
> > important
> > > questions that the liberal media and koolaid
> > > drinking never-trumpers avoid answering.
> > Anyone?
> > >
> > > If you are driving in a car at the speed of
> > light
> > > and turn on your headlights, would the
> > headlights
> > > work? Would they illuminate objects in your
> > > path?
> > >
> > > Who is buried in Grant’s tomb?
> > >
> > > What is the real meaning of Euler’s
> Identity?
> >
> > > e^i(pi)-1=0
> > >
> > > Is your refrigerator running?
> > >
> > > There are at least a hundred more of these
> > > questions being asked by many people
> everyday,
> > but
> > > no one seems to answer them. Why?
> >
> >
> > So, still no answers then? That's OK, I have
> > more.
>
>
> First, there is really no such thing as the Deep
> State, if there were, we would have had Trump's
> tax return years ago.
>
> Now I have a couple of questions
>
>
> How can a "phone call" be "perfect" and
> "Beautiful?"
> Were the buttons pressed with fine finesse?
>
>
> Why do they call it "rush hour" when everything
> moves so slow?
>
> M favorite Trump tweet


More denial then? Sure, whatever helps you sleep at night. Anyone else want to have a go at it? Every question posed on Trump and the deep state are based on facts and provable events. Perhaps that is why the deep state apologists here won't answer them.

poliana Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> First, there is really no such thing as the Deep
> State, if there were, we would have had Trump's
> tax return years ago.
>
> Now I have a couple of questions
>
>
> How can a "phone call" be "perfect" and
> "Beautiful?"
> Were the buttons pressed with fine finesse?
>
>
> Why do they call it "rush hour" when everything
> moves so slow?
>
> M favorite Trump tweet


First, your Trump tweet is a fake. So you've proven you're easily fooled.

Second, if there is no deep state, then the answer to all the questions is that they are just merely coincidences and harmless mistakes and that there really isn't collusion going on to frame President Trump with one scandal after another that all turn out to be false and based on the same group of players. But I'll keep pointing out these coincidences and harmless mistakes in the form of questions to see if there might be another answer.

Deep State: (1) anyone who questions or challenges Trump (2) an excuse used to conceal one’s poor leadership or bad decision making

Perhaps someone here can answer this simple question. You're all peachy.

Why did Rod Rosenstein write a memo to President Donald J. Trump and recommend that he fire then FBI-director James Comey and then, less that two weeks later, he selected Comey's best friend Robert Mueller to be a special counsel to investigate, among other things, Trump possibly obstructing justice for firing James Comey?

A quick question with an obvious answer to those who have a brain.

Why won't Nancy Pelosi call for a vote on starting an impeachment inquiry as has been done for both Nixon and Clinton and instead is calling the work of 6 different committees doing oversight "an impeachment inquiry" and allowing them to demand the waiving of executive privilege by Trump or he will be considered obstructing justice? What the actual fuck. How can any sane person think this is OK?

Hoping one of you rabid anti-Trumpers here answer this question.

why are you more concerned and batshit crazy about Trump asking Ukraine to look into why the investigation was shelved instead of the fact that Biden threatened to withhold $1.2 billion in US aid if the prosecutor who was investigating his son's company was fired within 6 hours?

A couple of things that has most of us pondering for an answer or two.

Why did Nancy Pelosi's son, who was on the board of Viscoil Oil, go to Ukraine in 2017 to meet with the government there on securing funding for his energy company?

Why did Nancy give the keynote speech at the company's conference in Washington DC in 2013?

Why does Ukraine, a well-known center of corruption, money-laudering and gateway to Russian oligarchs and Putin, have so many ties to democrats and their kids?

Just curious about one thing and maybe one of you could clear it up.

Why won't Adam Schiff give the GOP members of the House Intel Committee any subpoena power and instead keep all that power limited to the democrats on the committee? That doesn't seem like he's searching for anything other than bullshit.

A question that even you TDS morons can answer.

Wouldn't it be better for the FBI and CIA to just admit that they fucked up and tried to take out Trump rather than continue to look like traitorous political hacks in a drip-drip-drip manner? They could blame it all on Comey, McCabe, Brennan and Clapper. If they had done that, we'd have thrown those traitors in jail for 5 or 6 years and moved on. Now, it's all going to come out as a result of 3 investigations and take down the minions and leaders as well.

Poorly played deep state. You're inability to sacrifice a few lieutenants and colonels is going to end up decimating your entire little cabal and taking out a few of your upper echelon puppet masters.

I wonder what the answer is to this simple question.

Why was it OK for the media and Obama administration to investigate Donald Trump when he was the republican nominee in 2016, looking for evidence of corruption and collusion with foreign governments, but Joe Biden is off limits to any scrutiny by the media and the Trump administration for corruption and collusion with foreign governments?

Perhaps some research might uncover the answer to this question.

Why are the kids of prominent democrats doing energy (gas and oil) deals with Ukrainian oligarchs when Ukraine has almost no natural gas or oil industry?

A Friday night question looking for an answer for a date.

Now that we know Adam Schiff lied about meeting with the 'whistle blower' prior to even filing the complaint, and now that we know that the 'whistle blower' did not tell the ICIG that he was coordinating with Adam Schiff's office when he filed the complaint, can any sane, rational person not conclude that this is nothing more than a political hit job by an incompetent and desperate trifecta of loserdom that is the democrats, the CIA and the media?

This question comes to mind. Perhaps someone can answer it.

Why is it OK for any democrat who is running for president to call for an investigation of President Trump? Isn't that colluding against your political opponent?

Why did the 'whistle blower' lie on the complaint form? He did not check that he had disclosed the complaint to anyone else and he did not check the box that he had talked to Congress. That's perjury. The ICIG said he never looked into this because the 'whistle blower' didn't check those boxes or otherwise disclose that he had been working with the office of Adam Schiff.



 
Attachments:

Why do democrats and the media think Trump supporters are concerned that Trump does shit that no other president has done? That's why we voted for him. Only faggots and corrupt assholes were happy with the status quo.

Perhaps now that some of you have had a week to think about things, you might be able to answer any of the simple questions that have been asked, including this one.

Why does Joe Biden go apeshit crazy when someone asks him about his son's ties to Ukraine and China and scream, "I'm not going to answer that" then immediately tries to tell us that we should instead investigate the guy trying to get to the bottom of all of that apparent corruption?

Question for all of ya.

Does anyone think it's strange that the tiny, impoverished country Ukraine gave more money to the Clinton Foundation between 2009 and 2014 than any other country on this planet?

A question S'il Vous Plait.

In 2018, why did 44 former CIA agents run for congress, all as democrats?

If one can dispute this, let us know.

Why is there no record of Hunter Biden ever setting foot in Ukraine? He was making $80K/month serving as a board member of a Ukrainian energy company, so you'd think he might have gone there at least once.

Do these events concern any libtards here?

In April, 2014 Devon Archer (a long time business partner of Hunter Biden) visits VP Joe Biden at the White House.

5 days later, Biden visits Ukraine as the point man for the administration's Ukrainian policy. Biden is there to discuss several billion dollars in USAID assistance to get the fledging Ukrainian NG and oil industry up and running.

1 day after Biden meets with Ukrainian officials, Devon Archer is named to the board of Burisma, a Ukrainian NG company.

3 weeks after Biden's trip to Ukraine, Hunter Biden is named to the board of Burisma. Neither Archer of Hunter Biden have any experience in the energy industry.

Less than 2 years later, a Ukrainian prosecutor was investigating Burisma for corruption and money-laundering by Russian and Ukrainian oligarchs. Biden visits Ukraine again in March 2016 and demands that the Ukrainian government fire the prosecutor or future US aid (both economic and military) would be withheld. The prosecutor is relieved within 3 hours and suspended from his job. He is later fired 2 months later.

All of the above are facts with logs and contemporaneous stories in the news about visits and travel.

Criminals have always demanded to go unpunished because of the actions of other people, and claim they’re the ones being victimized, or that their actions are somehow justified by what others have done.

Why did libtards think it was great to look into 2016 for 3 years, getting a special counsel who had unlimited authority to do as he pleased to investigate Trump but now that Trump is looking into what happened in 2016, the libtards are going bonkers?

Do any of you libtards have a problem with the fact that one partisan, leftist lawyer is representing both whistle blowers/leakers and that he set up a web site one month after Trump was sworn in as president, Whistleblower Aid, a website that encourages people to help "fight the threats to the republic" by leaking any perceived slights by the new administration and that it is partly funded by Soros' Open Society and that the co-founder used to work for SPLC?

Any of you libtards still want to lie that this is anything other than a lame political hit job on Trump?

Are any libtards here concerned that the ICIG, after finally testifying under oath (had to tell the truth), admitted that the changes to the ICIG whistle blower complaint form was actually changed in early September to allow 2nd hand information to be used for 'credible and urgent' complaints after telling the public for 2 weeks that it was done in early August?

Of course, the first complaint could not be considered 'credible and urgent' because the form used in August required first hand knowledge. So they changed the form and used the exact same complaint language.

Gee, why would anyone think there is any corruption in this whole cart full of bullshit?

All you’re doing is gaslighting with these dumb questions. Anybody who’s critical of Trump would be labeled as “partisan/leftist”. They called John Bolton “a leftist” just last month. John Bolton. And of course the whole world is conspiring against an Eagle Scout like Trump, and working with Soros, the Clintons, the Illuminati, etc. When you’re a narcissist, everybody else is wrong and plotting against you 24/7. So of course we’re all shocked that these whistleblowers didn’t go out and sign Giuliani up as their lawyer.

Cuckoo Rudy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> All you’re doing is gaslighting with these dumb
> questions. Anybody who’s critical of Trump
> would be labeled as “partisan/leftist”. They
> called John Bolton “a leftist” just last
> month. John Bolton. And of course the whole
> world is conspiring against an Eagle Scout like
> Trump, and working with Soros, the Clintons, the
> Illuminati, etc. When you’re a narcissist,
> everybody else is wrong and plotting against you
> 24/7. So of course we’re all shocked that these
> whistleblowers didn’t go out and sign Giuliani
> up as their lawyer.


No one called Bolton a leftist. He's been called a globalist and a war-mongering neo-con. That is what he is. Sorry, no cigar for you. But at least you tried to spin this, which is more than any other libtard has done.

To a libtard, every meeting any Trump has ever had is a conspiracy but every meeting that a democrat has is just harmless coincidences. That's what brought us the Russian Collusion Hoax and 2½ years of lies and bullshit. You idiots bought into the biggest political gaslighting in history and still can't admit you're being played every day.

All these questions lead any thinking person to the conclusion that there is a thing called the deep state, that the media is corrupt as hell and that our intelligence and federal law enforcement agencies are trying to decide who gets to be our president. Fuck that.

who are the one's getting played Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Cuckoo Rudy Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > All you’re doing is gaslighting with these
> dumb
> > questions. Anybody who’s critical of Trump
> > would be labeled as “partisan/leftist”.
> They
> > called John Bolton “a leftist” just last
> > month. John Bolton. And of course the whole
> > world is conspiring against an Eagle Scout like
> > Trump, and working with Soros, the Clintons,
> the
> > Illuminati, etc. When you’re a narcissist,
> > everybody else is wrong and plotting against
> you
> > 24/7. So of course we’re all shocked that
> these
> > whistleblowers didn’t go out and sign
> Giuliani
> > up as their lawyer.
>
>
> No one called Bolton a leftist. He's been called
> a globalist and a war-mongering neo-con. That is
> what he is. Sorry, no cigar for you. But at
> least you tried to spin this, which is more than
> any other libtard has done.
>
> To a libtard, every meeting any Trump has ever had
> is a conspiracy but every meeting that a democrat
> has is just harmless coincidences. That's what
> brought us the Russian Collusion Hoax and 2½
> years of lies and bullshit. You idiots bought
> into the biggest political gaslighting in history
> and still can't admit you're being played every
> day.
>
> All these questions lead any thinking person to
> the conclusion that there is a thing called the
> deep state, that the media is corrupt as hell and
> that our intelligence and federal law enforcement
> agencies are trying to decide who gets to be our
> president. Fuck that.


Ahhh John Bolton. The neocon puppet that plays the 'hard-right world sheriff' in the globalist kabuki theatre. He's even got the mustache to prove it!


When Trump fired Bolton, the neocons knew Trump wasn't buying tickets to their play anymore even if the paid seats went empty. Hence operation 'whistleblower'

It's funny watching these pathetic CIA clowns and their hairbrained hijinks. Next thing you know they'll be sending Trump an exploding cigar.

Trump and his flowers are asses

Derick Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Trump and his flowers are asses


These pretty Trump flowers can be found at his golf course in Loudoun County. Very nice, not asses.


 
Attachments:

Why do democrats feel that Trump not cooperating with an attempt to impeach him is reason for impeachment? That's some fucked up circular logic don't ya know.

who are the one's getting played Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------
> No one called Bolton a leftist.


The day Bolton was fired Tucker Carlson called him “a man of the left” and a progressive.

What the hell happened to the CIA and FBI? They used to be able to keep a lid on their illegal activities and corrupt power-brokering. Now, it's all out in the open. All this has done is create a lack of trust between the people and these agencies. Who believes them anymore? I no longer have any confidence in anything that they say or report. Was that the goal of this whole thing - to destroy our trust in the pillars of our intelligence and law enforcement?

fox fact checker Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> who are the one's getting played Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> ----
> > No one called Bolton a leftist.
>
>
> The day Bolton was fired Tucker Carlson called him
> “a man of the left” and a progressive.


So 'they' is one guy then?

chesty Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What the hell happened to the CIA and FBI? They
> used to be able to keep a lid on their illegal
> activities and corrupt power-brokering. Now, it's
> all out in the open. All this has done is create
> a lack of trust between the people and these
> agencies. Who believes them anymore? I no longer
> have any confidence in anything that they say or
> report. Was that the goal of this whole thing -
> to destroy our trust in the pillars of our
> intelligence and law enforcement?

What happened is that the neocons infiltrated and schemed themselves to power under a fake 'republican/conservative' banner. They were never American patriots or real conservatives. Pat Buchannan warned us about these people. We know what happened to him...marginalized under one of their newspeak 'categories'

Hmmmmm....

Now that the ICIG has said under oath that the "whistle blower" admitted to a working relationship with a current democrat presidential candidate, does anyone still believe him? Anyone? Bueller?

If that's true, they should be perp walked and see significant jail time.

smh....

Now that we have found out that Ukraine reopened their investigation into Burisma and Hunter Biden in late February, 4 months BEFORE Trump's phone call to Zelensky, is this whole thing really just a feeble democrat set up?

Wow....

Now that we know Robert Mueller lied in his testimony before Congress and that he was, in fact, interviewed for the FBI director's job (and rejected) the day before being named special counsel, does anyone still think the Russian Collusion investigation was anything more than a silly, partisan witch-hunt by the swamp?

And now that we know that Rosenstein had conversations with Mueller 4 days before the job interview with Trump about possibly being named special counsel, is this just another improbable coincidence that happens to occur with the same 5 or 6 people all the time when it comes to investigating Trump and protecting Hillary Clinton?

All this came out yesterday in emails that Judicial Watch had to sue to get.

Does anyone know the answer to the question below...

Why did Nancy Pelosi change the rules of the House regarding impeached on August 12th, the same day that Schiff received the 'whistle blower' complaint from the ICIG to allow multiple committees to begin impeachment inquiries without any formal vote, which had never been done before? Is this just another one of those weird coincidences?

the truth is out there somewhere Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Does anyone know the answer to the question
> below...
>
> Why did Nancy Pelosi change the rules of the House
> regarding impeached on August 12th, the same day
> that Schiff received the 'whistle blower'
> complaint from the ICIG to allow multiple
> committees to begin impeachment inquiries without
> any formal vote, which had never been done before?
> Is this just another one of those weird
> coincidences?

Keep up the good work, Friend. American patriots are watching this thread.

Do you think the bush/clinton/obama state dept, CIA or FBI traitors are watching?


If so, Do you think that deep down in their pathetically weak and traitorous minds, that they are starting to question their juxtaposition of globalism on American patriotism?


They are sowing the seeds of civil war, and they don't care. They will come to care.

If Micheal Atkinson, the ICIG, was the chief counsel to former FBI National Security Chief John Carlin, who was then FBI-director Robert Mueller's Chief of Staff, while the FBI was conducting their investigation into the Russian Collusion hoax, the status of which Carlin was being briefed on twice a week, does that cast any doubt into the fairness of Atkinson? Just asking for a friend.

Now that we know the 'whistle blower' worked as a CIA analyst in the White House during Biden's time there as VP and the ICIG admitted that the 'whistle blower' had a working relationship with one of the democrat presidential candidates and that means it had to be with Joe Biden since that is where the analyst worked for the past 7 years supporting the National Security Council (located in the White House), does anyone still not know this guy is just a political hack trying to save his own ass since he worked with Biden during the whole Ukrainian shake down?

Since we now know that at least two of Adam Schiff's aides used to work with the 'whistle blower' while at the White House working with Joe Biden, can anyone still be stupid enough to not see what a crappy 2nd-rate political hit-job this all is now?

Is it weird that the attorney representing the two 'whistle blowers' is himself a former CIA 'whistle blower' who derailed Christopher Sharpley, the person Trump nominated as the ICIG, by going public with unprovable accusations when he couldn't get the Senate Intel Committee to hold up the nomination by hiding behind anonymity and that this same attorney has a previous close working relationship with Hillary Clinton?

Isn't it also weird that Trump had to settle for Michael Atkinson, a 'consensus' choice and a career DOJ official, who served as Asst. US Attorney for DC under the Obama admin, defending the actions of the administration in the two most powerful federal courts in the nation before moving to the DOJ's National Security Division after Trump won in late 2016?

Does it strike anyone as odd that the priority for Atkinson has been to revive the communities 'whistle blower' program, that had been considered dormant for the previous 8 years while Obama was in office?

All of this is true and easily verified by simple duckduckgo'ing it.

Now that we have found out the following about the recent Fox News poll:

It oversampled democrats v republicans by 14 points (48% to 34%)
It undersampled independents by 30 points (9% vs 39%)
The director of the poll is a former Hillary 2016 organizing director from PA

is there any doubt that there is collusion between the media and the democrat party in trying to cook up a fake scandal to get Trump out of the way before all the investigations into the Obama/Clinton/Biden corruption comes out?

So now that we know Maria Yovanovich, the former Obama administration's Ukrainian ambassador, had a "do not prosecute" list that she gave to the former Ukrainian Chief Prosecutor, with names of Ukrainian citizens that the US government did not want investigated or prosecuted, and threatened US aid if the list was not adhered to, does anyone think she's a credible source of anything other than the corruption of the Obama administration, especially Joe Biden, who was leading the administration's Ukrainian engagement?

As it has now come out that the 'whistle blower' is almost certainly Eric Ciaramella, a CIA official who traveled with Biden during his trips to Ukraine when he was VP and is up to his neck in Biden's dealings with the Ukrainian leadership during that time, is anyone retarded enough to still believe this is nothing other than a failing, cover-our-asses attempt to put up enough bullshit to soften the landing of upcoming justice against the Bidens and their enablers who were using Ukraine as their own private piggy bank?

With the latest news of an about face from Adam Schiff, retracting the need to get testimony from the 'whistle blower' (aka democrat CIA shill Eric Ciaramella) and now tells us that his testimony is not 'that important' to hear, are any of my fellow undergrounders brain-dead enough to not see what a silly partisan scam this is and that it's all been cooked up to confuse the ignorant?

This Eric dude was also a "beach buddy' of Dr Liecunt B Ford. LOLZ!

I heard Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> This Eric dude was also a "beach buddy' of Dr
> Liecunt B Ford. LOLZ!

Got link?

Eric Ciaramella has claimed at least twice before that he was receiving death threats. Two times while at the NSC, he claimed that he had received them and that led to his returning to his home agency (CIA). Can this guy ever tell the truth?

And why did Ciaramella's attorney threaten on twitter to use his intelligence and law enforcement sources to dox anyone who brings attention to all this?

https://thefederalist.com/2019/10/10/anti-trump-whistleblower-attorney-threatened-to-dox-anonymous-twitter-account/

 
Attachments:

Why did then-ambassador Marie Yovanovitch, an Obama-appointed to Ukraine, send a request to the State Department to use departmental resources to monitor several US citizens, all involved one way or the other, in investigating Joe Biden's potential corruption in that country?

Why were the terms she wanted monitored include her own name, George Soros, Joe Biden, Hunter Biden, Giuliani, and Burisma?

She was told that using departmental resources to conduct such monitoring was illegal in the communications sent between the department and the Ukrainian embassy using top-secret communications channels.

And she made these requests as Rudy Giuliani was working with Ukranian officials to determine the extent of that country's involvement in the 2016 election as part of the defense of the Mueller investigation.

And why didn't the Mueller investigators ever talk to anyone in the Ukraine about what Giuliani was investigating?

All questions in search of answers.

Now that we know Adam Schiff's staff went to Ukraine in August, after talking with the 'whistle blower' and they met with Bill Taylor, the acting ambassador, and that the trip was to attend an event paid for by the Atlantic Council, and that one of the major contributors to the Atlantic Council is Burisma, the company Hunter Biden was given over $50K a month to attend 1 meeting a year (never in Ukraine for some reason), and soon after that meeting with Bill Taylor, Taylor sent his infamous IM to the new Ukrainian ambassador Kurt Volker and that Bill Taylor was just a leftover senior staffer from Obama-appointed Marie Yovanovitch and was her charge d'affaires, does anyone not see how this all just a silly, incompetent political hit job?

And now that is has come to light that Bill Taylor had a close working relationship with the Atlantic Council, being paid for writing papers and giving speeches at their events through his job at the U.S.-Ukraine Business Council, which funnels money and influence in Ukraine from and to US business interests, does anyone believe this entire impeachment nonsense is more than just "orange man bad" bullshit?

tangled web Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Now that we know Adam Schiff's staff went to
> Ukraine in August, after talking with the 'whistle blower' and


Igor Fruman?

the whistleblower Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> tangled web Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Now that we know Adam Schiff's staff went to
> > Ukraine in August, after talking with the
> 'whistle blower' and
>
>
> Igor Fruman?

Yeah Igor Fruman and that other asshole are the whistleblowers and they actually work for Joe Biden and Adam Schiff. It’s all a big-set up to make Trump and Giuliani appear dishonest!

Why did Joe Biden's office ignore repeated concerns expressed by Deputy Assistant Secretary of State George Kent in 2015 when Kent brought up numerous problems and concerns about Hunter Biden accepting a role on the board of Burisma, specifically that it was going to complicate US efforts to reign in corruption in Ukraine, which the Vice President was leading the effort of?

https://buffalochronicle.com/2019/09/26/bolton-contacted-whistleblower-prior-to-filing-complaint-suggesting-an-attempted-coup/

In the hours after National Security Advisor John Bolton was fired by President Donald Trump on September 10th, he immediately began calling longtime political operatives in Washington, DC, sources tell The Chronicle. Many of those calls were made to Democrats and many of them in the national security establishment.

One of those contacts was the intelligence agency whistleblower who filed the now-famous complaint pertaining to the President’s call with President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine, that is now the subject of intense congressional scrutiny. That complaint was filed only weeks before, on August 12th. The source alleges that the whistleblower was given the information that comprises the contents of his complaint from Bolton himself, which if true would constitute an extraordinary breach of national security and an indictable offense punishable by imprisonment.

“It’s go time,” he began those conversations, multiple sources tell The Chronicle, as if to suggest that Bolton’s patience with the President had worn thin, and even implying later in more than one conversation that a faction of neo-conservatives at the Central Intelligence Agency was ready to remove the President from office.

Does anyone find it noteworthy that an analysis by Barr's team that is investigating the 2016 Russian Collusion hoax has concluded that there were 3 small groups of conspirators (DOJ/FBI, CIA/ODNI, and State) that used specific media outlets for 3 years continuously to leak stories and try and shape a public narrative regarding Russia, the Trump Campaign and the coverup?

DOJ/FBI used the NY Times and NBC
CIA/ODNI used the Wash Post and ABC
State used CNN and CBS

It was always the same reporters breaking parts of the same narrative spread across the 3 groups. The 3 groups coordinated who was going to leak which part of their story to their propaganda mouthpieces in the media. It is unclear if the media pawns were willing cooperating with the leakers or if they were just being used.

The key personnel in the 3 groups have all started to lawyer up after being interviewed by the investigators of Barr and Durham's teams.

Why did Nancy Pelosi and a dozen House democrats go to Jordan to try and undermine US foreign policy, which is 100% the responsibility of the executive branch, with the King of Jordan, who then told him he appreciated their visit but agreed with Trump's actions in Syria 100% and told them all to go see some sites around the country and then go the fuck home?

Why are the liberals and the media (one in the same actually) so upset about Trump's phone call to Zelensky when the NY Times published a story on Rudy Giuliani's trips to Ukraine two months before the phone call where Giuliani said he was going to there to investigate Ukraine's involvement in the 2016 spygate hoax and look into Hunter Biden's corruption since Joe Biden came out and bragged about getting a prosecutor fired?


 
Attachments:

Anyone know why Lisa Page was instructed by McCabe to change Michael Flynn's 302 (FBI deposition notes)?

Anyone know why James Clapper texted James Ignatius, WaPo reporter, to instruct him that now was the time to "take the kill shot" on Michael Flynn. Two days later, Ignatius published a piece that Flynn was being investigated by DOJ/FBI officials for work he had done with the Russians and other foreign governments while a lobbyist the previous 18 months.

Why did Philip Reeker, the acting assistant secretary of State for European and Eurasian affairs and a scheduled witness in Adam Schiff's hoax of an impeachment inquiry, suddenly cancel his long-scheduled speaking engagement at (yet another) Atlantic Council's conference in Washington DC this week? You might remember that The Atlantic Council is used to funnel money to former state department and intelligence officials for "speaking engagements" and is closely aligned with Burisma, the Ukrainian Energy company that Hunter Biden sold his influence to.

The fact is, nobody forced these trump people to break the law, so instead of worrying themselves with these screwball ‘deep state’ conspiracies they should be concerned about the parade of witnesses who’ve come forward to provide testimony against them.

dorky alt right nimrods Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The fact is, nobody forced these trump people to
> break the law, so instead of worrying themselves
> with these screwball ‘deep state’ conspiracies
> they should be concerned about the parade of
> witnesses who’ve come forward to provide
> testimony against them.


Why are all these "witnesses" connected to the same groups? The same people? The same sources? The same streams of income? No my friend, even the NYTimes now admits there is a deep state working against Trump and trying to thwart his agenda. They should know, they are a part of it.

Does anyone believe that the Washington Post, New York Times, CNN, ABC/NBC/CBS, Politico or Vox wouldn't be pushing 24/7 if a GOP freshman congressman was outed as having a 3some with his wife and another man and posted naked pictures of himself all over the Internet 2 years ago? Especially if that congressman had been on the front lines of accusing a SCOTUS nominee of inappropriate conduct from 40 years ago to try and derail the nomination? Or that he had given a 6-figure job to the other man in his congressional office and taken the other staffer on congressional trips?

Yet, with the Katie Hill clown show, we have nothing from these "news" outlets. WaPo is still whining about that truck load of 39 chinamen found dead in the UK but not one story on their web front page about Hill. No collusion there I'm sure.

control the message for the team Wrote:
----------------------------------------------------
> Yet, with the Katie Hill clown show,

probably because it involves revenge porn, which is actually against the law in most states. also, most people don’t even know who she is. i didn’t until i saw the thread posted here. i’m not even sure why i should care who she is or if she’s gay or smoked cannabis before it was legalized.

a non story Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> control the message for the team Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> --
> > Yet, with the Katie Hill clown show,
>
> probably because it involves revenge porn, which
> is actually against the law in most states. also,
> most people don’t even know who she is. i
> didn’t until i saw the thread posted here.
> i’m not even sure why i should care who she is
> or if she’s gay or smoked cannabis before it was
> legalized.


 
Attachments:

a non story Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> control the message for the team Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> --
> > Yet, with the Katie Hill clown show,
>
> probably because it involves revenge porn, which
> is actually against the law in most states. also,
> most people don’t even know who she is. i
> didn’t until i saw the thread posted here.
> i’m not even sure why i should care who she is
> or if she’s gay or smoked cannabis before it was
> legalized.


That's probably what Tim Murphy from PA thought a couple of years ago. Instead, he was forced to resign after news came out about an affair, which was covered on just about every news organization when the affair became public (by the jilted husband looking for revenge). No one knew who he was either. Weak sauce you got there.

Why did the target of a corruption crackdown in Romania, where VP Joe Biden had just been dispatched for the purpose of overseeing US interests in the corruption crackdown, hire Hunter Biden to be his lawyer to provide advice and guidance in the upcoming corruption crackdown? Hunter Biden's fee was reportedly over $800,000.

dorky alt right nimrods Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> they should be concerned about the parade of
> witnesses who’ve come forward to provide
> testimony against them.


They’re shitting themselves today because Bolton’s about to give testimony on those Ukrainian “drug deals” he’s referred to, shady stuff Trump & Jaliani were up to. They’ll probably just accuse him of being part of the grand conspiracy, which makes their scenarios seem even more half-baked.

Does anyone think it's just a coincidence that Mike Flynn was targeted by the FBI and CIA after he was selected as the National Security Advisor and told Trump that Trump needed to audit the intelligence apparatus of the US and that he would like to lead that effort?

The conversation was part of a phone call that Trump and Flynn had that was captured by the illegal FISA "surveillance" the FBI was running against the Trump campaign. Suddenly, Flynn is a Russian asset according to leaked stories from Comey and Brennan's offices.

Second question:

Should Trump select Flynn as NS advisor for his second term and let him loose on those lying traitors?

Why did Bill Taylor, Adam Schiff's key witness on the Ukrainian non-story, go to Ukraine in April as a paid observer of the Ukrainian elections, paid for by a George Soros funded organization (National Democratic Institute) that just happens to have Hunter Biden as one of the ten members of its board of directors? So many coincidences that this small cabal of people and organizations all have the same dozen or so players involved at every turn isn't it?

why did Alex Vindman, the Lt. Colonel who was born in the Ukraine and appears to be the initial source of all the leaks of the now-publicly-available phone call, contact officials in the Ukrainian government after the call and advise them to not reopen the Biden investigation or they would lose bi-partisan support in Congress for any additional funding?

He told Schiff's committee that he did so because he was worried that democrats would retaliate if they found out the new Ukrainian government was working the Trump administration on investigating their party's presidential front-runner. So his first allegiance was to Ukraine, not the US. And he puts funding for Ukraine above implementing the foreign policy of the administration. And this traitorous piece of shit is supposed to be Schiff's star witness?

My gosh you democrats are desperate morons to have bought into yet another made-up pile of horseshit from your deep state masters.

Does anyone find it interesting that Lt. Colonel Alex Vindman's older brother (Leonid) founded and runs Tungsten Capital Advisors, a financial investments firm that focuses on providing financial services for US and Central-Eastern European (read Ukraine) investment deals? His company has managed deals with hundreds of billions of dollars changing hands over the 25 years that he has run his company.

spots more dots Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Does anyone find it interesting that Lt. Colonel
> Alex Vindman's older brother (Leonid) founded and
> runs Tungsten Capital Advisors, a financial
> investments firm that focuses on providing
> financial services for US and Central-Eastern
> European (read Ukraine) investment deals? His
> company has managed deals with hundreds of
> billions of dollars changing hands over the 25
> years that he has run his company.

Very interesting if true.

Do you have a link? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> spots more dots Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Does anyone find it interesting that Lt.
> Colonel
> > Alex Vindman's older brother (Leonid) founded
> and
> > runs Tungsten Capital Advisors, a financial
> > investments firm that focuses on providing
> > financial services for US and Central-Eastern
> > European (read Ukraine) investment deals? His
> > company has managed deals with hundreds of
> > billions of dollars changing hands over the 25
> > years that he has run his company.
>
> Very interesting if true.


Really, you couldn't just duckduckgo trungsten capital advisors?

http://www.tungstencapitaladvisors.com/Leadership.html

Why did Robert Hannigan, then-director of Britain's GCHQ, their electronic spying agency, send a letter to then-Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs Boris Johnson in Nov 2016, asking him to renew an active spying operation (Operation Fulsome) on the Trump campaign that UK's intel services were conducting at the request of the then-president of the US (Obama if you don't remember) and his national security advisor (Susan Rice).

Hannigan resigned the day after Trump was sworn in for "personal reasons". He is now an advisor to CrowdStrike.

Lots o CIA people won elections in 2018.
Jus sayin

Why did Eric Ciaramella, the CIA person who worked for/with Schiff as the 'whistle blower', meet for dinner with John Brennan and Susan Rice in October of 2016 while working with Alexandra Chalupa of the DNC dirty tricks team to smear Trump before he was elected president and then got a job as DNI's McMasters as his chief of staff and was forced to return to the CIA after he was booted from the NSA staff for leaking?

Your government for sale Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> A couple of things that has most of us pondering
> for an answer or two.
>
> Why did Nancy Pelosi's son, who was on the board
> of Viscoil Oil, go to Ukraine in 2017 to meet with
> the government there on securing funding for his
> energy company?
>
> Why did Nancy give the keynote speech at the
> company's conference in Washington DC in 2013?
>
> Why does Ukraine, a well-known center of
> corruption, money-laudering and gateway to Russian
> oligarchs and Putin, have so many ties to
> democrats and their kids?


Update: Nancy Pelosi's son quietly resigned from the board of Viscoil Oil two weeks ago after the video of Nancy's speech surfaced. Why?

nothing to see here, keep moving Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Your government for sale Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > A couple of things that has most of us
> pondering
> > for an answer or two.
> >
> > Why did Nancy Pelosi's son, who was on the
> board
> > of Viscoil Oil, go to Ukraine in 2017 to meet
> with
> > the government there on securing funding for
> his
> > energy company?
> >
> > Why did Nancy give the keynote speech at the
> > company's conference in Washington DC in 2013?
> >
> > Why does Ukraine, a well-known center of
> > corruption, money-laudering and gateway to
> Russian
> > oligarchs and Putin, have so many ties to
> > democrats and their kids?
>
>
> Update: Nancy Pelosi's son quietly resigned from
> the board of Viscoil Oil two weeks ago after the
> video of Nancy's speech surfaced. Why?


Update 2: The company (Viscoil Oil) has been shut down by the SEC, existing now only as a virtual company as two of the company's leaders have been charged for failure to disclose they were convicted felons. It's estimated the Paul Pelosi made almost $40 million before all this fell apart. Pelosi skated of course.

Why did the kids of Joe Biden, Mitt Romney, Nancy Pelosi and John Kerry all have cushy jobs as board members and advisors to Ukrainian energy companies?

Why did Adam Schiff admit that the reason he has to have the final say in what witness can be called in the impeachment inquiry is because he is worried that the GOP will call witness that will "smear" his witnesses?

In a totally unrelated fact, Websters defines "impeach" thusly:

2. transitive verb
to cast doubt on
especially: to challenge the credibility or validity of
ex: impeach the testimony of a witness

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/impeach

Weird huh?

Why did the lawyer for Eric Ciaramella (the now debunked and shamed 'whistle blower') break off negotiations with Adam Schiff and the House Intelligence Committee yesterday and say his client will not testify in an open hearing and will fight any subpoena to try and force him to do so?

The wheels are coming off Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Why did the lawyer for Eric Ciaramella (the now
> debunked and shamed 'whistle blower') break off
> negotiations with Adam Schiff and the House
> Intelligence Committee yesterday and say his
> client will not testify in an open hearing and
> will fight any subpoena to try and force him to do
> so?


Conversely, why did the lawyer for Rick Perry, current Energy Secretary, say he will only appear at an OPEN hearing and not behind closed doors in a secret hearing?

Why did Tashina Guahar, the principle DOJ attorney for National Security, leave her job quietly a couple of months ago as the draft IG report on FISA abuses was first shared with AG Barr? Guahar was in charge of the FISA process for the DOJ and was also one of 4 DOJ officials who recommended to then-AG Jeff Sessions that he should recuse himself in an official memo from early 2017. She also was one of a handful or people Rosenstein was consulting with regarding opening up a Special Counsel investigation into the Russian Collusion hoax.

Internal sources are suggesting that Guahar was a cooperating witness with the IG Horowitz's FISA abuse investigation and the AG allowed her seek a private sector job (she's now corporate council for Boeing). Supposedly, her name will be one of the few that is redacted from the final report because of the level of her cooperation.

Do you find it interesting that Mark Zaid, the 'whistle blower's' lawyer, sent out a tweet on July 1, 2017 saying that he's going to get Trump out of office. He had just set up the organization WhistleblowerAid, to encourage deep state leakers to come forward with any information that could damage Trump.

Why has the digital footprint of Eric Ciaramella been scrubbed from the Internet? The scrubbing started in early September, a couple of weeks after he met with Schiff's staffers to plan out the 'whistle blower' plan. Most of his facebook, instagram, flickr, twitter and other posts/pics that he put up have disappeared.

Why did the Mueller report footnote Eric Ciaramella's name as the author of notes of a summary of a meeting between Trump administration and Russian officials which were then leaked to the NYTimes?

Does anyone know why Former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch told a bold-face lie to Congress in closed-door testimony when she denied that she had coordinated with staff from Adam Schiff's office prior to the shit hitting the fan on the 'whistle blower's' complaint? She acknowledged receiving an email from the staffer, but said she ignored it and never even replied. Instead, her reply from a private email account that she had forwarded the email to has been discovered. Isn't Roger Stone facing 10 years in jail for lying to Congress? Do any of you braindead sheeple think Yovanovitch will even get so much as a stern talking to for provably doing what Stone is charged with?

Oddly enough the so-called whistleblower is really a corrupt partisan hack.
Attachments:

Why has Adam Schiff rejected 4 of the 7 witnesses the House GOP wants to call for open hearings, including the "whistle blower" and Hunter Biden? They have also said they would not let Joe Biden be called to be questioned on his admission that he had a prosecutor in Ukraine fired that was investigating his son by threatening to withhold $1billion in US aid. Schiff also has signaled that Nellie Ohr, the go-between for the FBI, the DOJ and Fusion GPS during the Russian hoax, is not relevant and would probably not be allowed to testify as well as Devon Archer, Hunter Biden's business partner in his investment company that was involved in Ukraine and China.

Why did Michael Atkinson, the ICIG and now-demonstrated ally of Comey and Brennan, go to the House Intel Committee yesterday and meet with Adam Schiff's staff to discuss the new IG complaint against Eric CIA-maella (the "whistle blower") for accepting over $250,000 in a gofundme account. Atkinson just got the complaint a week or so ago, yet he's discussing it with Adam Schiff's staff. Nothing to see here I'm sure.

Adm. Rogers knows Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Why has Adam Schiff rejected 4 of the 7 witnesses
> the House GOP wants to call for open hearings,
> including the "whistle blower" and Hunter Biden?
> They have also said they would not let Joe Biden
> be called to be questioned on his admission that
> he had a prosecutor in Ukraine fired that was
> investigating his son by threatening to withhold
> $1billion in US aid. Schiff also has signaled
> that Nellie Ohr, the go-between for the FBI, the
> DOJ and Fusion GPS during the Russian hoax, is not
> relevant and would probably not be allowed to
> testify as well as Devon Archer, Hunter Biden's
> business partner in his investment company that
> was involved in Ukraine and China.


Update: one 2 of the 9 witnesses the GOP wanted to call are being allowed by Adam Schiff. He said he won't let the GOP members "confuse" the American voters by allowing them to call anyone who can testify about the shady dealings of the Bidens or 2016 Ukrainian involvement in the US elections. Time for a special prosecutor.

*only, not one.

Why did Deborah Furlan Taylor, wife of the star witness for the democrats at today's impeachment sham, donate the maximum to a Bernie Sanders PAC?

Now that we have discovered the direct link between the "whistle blower" Eric Ciaramella and The Open Society, with FIOA'ed emails detailed the communications between Ciaramella and high level policy advisors of TOS, including details of George Soros' travels to Ukraine and his concerns about lack of progress on making Ukraine and Georgia more friendly to immigration, refugees and those seeking work visas, does anyone still put any credence into all this made-up bullshit by Schiff and his traitorous cabal?

Now that the fact that "whistle blower" Eric Ciamella's best friend is Sean Misko, who joined Adam Schiff's staff about a week before Ciamella went to "Schiff's staff" to raise concerns, and that Misko also served on the NSC with Ciamella and worked for Hillary Clinton's campaign senior advisor for foreign affairs while they served at State, does anyone still not realize this all just one, big, fat, fucked up attempt to set up Donald J. Trump?

Anyone know why Eric Ciaramella, the traitorous, lying, deep-state "whistle blower" is ducking the FBI, who have made repeated requests to his lawyer that interviewing him? If he has nothing to hide, why is he trying so hard not to talk to them? In the end, they'll get a warrant if they have to.

Now that it's been shown the law firm representing both the lying, traitorous, fat-as-shit, deep state pawn Vindman and Fiona Hill (set to testify today) also represents Burisma's US interests, are the dots big enough for even you blind partisan leftist fools to see yet?

So many dots connecting Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Now that it's been shown the law firm representing
> both the lying, traitorous, fat-as-shit, deep
> state pawn Vindman and Fiona Hill (set to testify
> today) also represents Burisma's US interests, are
> the dots big enough for even you blind partisan
> leftist fools to see yet?


Boies Schiller is also Harvey Weinstein's law firm, trying to cover all this perversions and sex crimes. This sleaze permeates the deep state the the ruling class from top to bottom.

it's everywhere Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> So many dots connecting Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Now that it's been shown the law firm
> representing
> > both the lying, traitorous, fat-as-shit, deep
> > state pawn Vindman and Fiona Hill (set to
> testify
> > today) also represents Burisma's US interests,
> are
> > the dots big enough for even you blind partisan
> > leftist fools to see yet?
>
>
> Boies Schiller is also Harvey Weinstein's law
> firm, trying to cover all this perversions and sex
> crimes. This sleaze permeates the deep state the
> the ruling class from top to bottom.


And Sondland's lead lawyer (who prepared his opening statement) also represented deep-state British spy Stefan Halper when he was questioned by Durham and the FBI. WOW!!!!!!

Since we now know that Hunter Biden's Rosemont Seneca Capital investment company received over $130 million in federal no-collateral TALF bailout loans after the financial meltdown in 2009 and that Hunter Biden is a named conspirator in the new Ukrainian indictment of Burisma for stealing government funds, should Joe Biden get the fuck out of the race before all his corruption is exposed publicly, taking down several of his close associates and powerful people (John Kerry, Nancy Pelosi, Barack Obama)?

Does anyone think it strange that Nancy Pelosi spent all that time since the Mueller report turned out to be a dud telling us that she wasn't for impeachment. And then, in October, when her son was identified as being involved the whole scam of kids of wealthy and politically connected Americans getting high paying "consulting" jobs in Ukraine (Kerry, Biden, Romney, Pelosi), she did a 180 and jumped into impeachment with both feet?

Adm. Rogers knows Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Does anyone think it strange that Nancy Pelosi
> spent all that time since the Mueller report
> turned out to be a dud telling us that she wasn't
> for impeachment. And then, in October, when her
> son was identified as being involved the whole
> scam of kids of wealthy and politically connected
> Americans getting high paying "consulting" jobs in
> Ukraine (Kerry, Biden, Romney, Pelosi), she did a
> 180 and jumped into impeachment with both feet?


Hmmm. that's indeed a strange coincidence. If you saw her at her press conference yesterday, she looked angry, sad, depressed, mumbling, rambling, incoherent and....guilt ridden as hell. Poor pathetic old prog hag Pelosi had to fall back on her religion to find her ground again.

She's toast, she knows it, and there's nothing she or the shitparty dems can do about it.

I was impressed that she was able to keep those teeth in her mouth. The entire time she was ranting, it looked like they were going to come spilling out.

So now that the unredacted FISA-abuse report is out and we've learned that:

The FBI was working to spy on the Trump campaign as early as November 2015
The FBI used their own intel that they leaked to Yahoo to justify the warrants
The FBI was told as early as July 2016 that most of the dossier was Russian disinformation
The FBI never brought their concerns about Carter Page to Trump or the Trump campaign
The DOJ argued that Carter Page's attempts to defend himself were a national security risk

Does anyone believe anything that Comey, McCabe, Brennan, Schiff, Pelosi, CNN, WaPo, NYTimes, NBC/CBS/ABC nightly news, or the other 99% of the media who pushed this bullshit story for 2 years have to say?

This whole thing was a Russian disinformation campaign to sow discontent in the U.S. that Hillary or Trump cheated to win in 2016. The FBI had blinders on and ignored copious amounts of evidence that showed early on this was all made up by the Russians and facilitated by the CIA. The U.S. media and their master in the democrat party bought it hook, line and sinker and then just couldn't let it go after it started falling apart.

In 100 years, Comey, McCabe and Brennan's names will be synonymous with Benedict Arnold.

This is what former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper testified to regarding the infamous 'Trump Towers Meeting'. He admits he learned about it from T.V. news reports. lol

 
Attachments: