HomeFairfax General ForumArrest/Ticket SearchWiki newPictures/VideosChatArticlesLinksAbout
Off-Topic :  Fairfax Underground fairfax underground logo
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Another failed DOS attempt...
Posted by: Gonads & Strife ()
Date: March 11, 2010 09:00AM

By Grabthar's ban hammer... by the Sons of Warvan... you shall be... avenged.
Attachments:
galaxyquest-5434.jpg

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Another failed DOS attempt...
Posted by: Qwest ()
Date: March 11, 2010 09:41AM

All Cary needs to do is login and check off delete on the all the junk threads. Takes about 3 seconds.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Another failed DOS attempt...
Posted by: Gonads & Strife ()
Date: March 11, 2010 09:42AM

That's why I don't understand these people who post the flood threads. Don't they realize that they're wasting their time?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Another failed DOS attempt...
Posted by: Gravis ()
Date: March 11, 2010 09:53AM

Gonads & Strife Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> That's why I don't understand these people who
> post the flood threads. Don't they realize that
> they're wasting their time?


that's just it, they dont realize how easy it is to torch all of the posts they have made.


"the wisdom of the wise will perish, the intelligence of the intelligent will vanish."095042938540

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Another failed DOS attempt...
Posted by: FoolSmacker ()
Date: March 11, 2010 12:24PM

Gonads & Strife Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> That's why I don't understand these people who
> post the flood threads. Don't they realize that
> they're wasting their time?


They don't care about wasting their own time. They have plenty of it.

They just like to waste OUR time. Gives them a little feeling of power that they wouldn't otherwise have.

---------------------------------
Who knows from whence he came, and who knows where he goes, dot dot dot.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Another failed DOS attempt...
Posted by: Registered Voter ()
Date: March 11, 2010 12:26PM

The problem of course is response time. They are obviously getting their purpose served while the posts continue to clog up the board.

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Another failed DOS attempt...
Posted by: Elle Diabla ()
Date: March 11, 2010 12:35PM

Talking about it is giving them material to beat off to.

This is their achievement, and I don't know abt you people, but when I achieve awesome shit, I masturbate for hours!

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Another failed DOS attempt...
Posted by: MrMephisto ()
Date: March 11, 2010 12:43PM

FoolSmacker Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> They don't care about wasting their own time. They
> have plenty of it.
>
> They just like to waste OUR time. Gives them a
> little feeling of power that they wouldn't
> otherwise have.

Exactly.

Elle Diabla Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Talking about it is giving them material to beat
> off to.
>
> This is their achievement, and I don't know abt
> you people, but when I achieve awesome shit, I
> masturbate for hours!

Double exactly.

--------------------------------------------------------------
13 4826 0948 82695 25847. Yes.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Another failed DOS attempt...
Posted by: Registered Voter ()
Date: March 12, 2010 01:06PM

I see the DOS retard is flailing about again.

HEY RETARD - MASTURBATING IS PROBABLY MORE REWARDING

I had to put that in caps so he might be able to read it - I am sure lowercase is beyond his comprehension at the moment.

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/12/2010 01:07PM by Registered Voter.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Another failed DOS attempt...
Posted by: Registered Voter ()
Date: March 12, 2010 01:12PM

*bump*

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Another failed DOS attempt...
Posted by: buster gonads ()
Date: March 12, 2010 01:16PM

Sticky: Unscheduled downtime: 3/1/2010 564 20 Cary 03/12/2010 11:40AM
Last Post by waah!
Sticky: Welcome to Fairfax Underground! [New users read this first] Pages: 1 2 3 All 42,514 235 Cary 03/02/2010 07:34PM
Last Post by ThirdReichFromTheSun
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> Greenpeace | Greenpeace U 1 1 daqjfndjnaq[fun 03/12/2010 01:14PM
Last Post by daqjfndjnaq[fun
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> Greenpeace | Greenpeace U 1 1 hairy palms 03/12/2010 01:13PM
Last Post by hairy palms
Another failed DOS attempt... 247 10 Gonads & Strife 03/12/2010 01:12PM
Last Post by Registered Voter
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> Greenpeace | Greenpeace U 1 1 ifcifdifi 03/12/2010 01:12PM
Last Post by ifcifdifi
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> Greenpeace | Greenpeace U 2 1 white rabiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiit 03/12/2010 01:11PM
Last Post by white rabiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiit
Sprint vs. Verizon 219 13 Sprint vs. Verizon 03/12/2010 01:11PM
Last Post by BJ_Sprint
The Mike O'Meara Show Pages: 1 ... 54 55 56 All 253,299 5,538 WashingToneLocian 03/12/2010 01:10PM
Last Post by Lady Baltimore
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> Greenpeace | Greenpeace U 2 1 descartes started the matrix 03/12/2010 01:10PM
Last Post by descartes started the matrix
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> Greenpeace | Greenpeace U 2 1 svg 03/12/2010 01:09PM
Last Post by svg
Binary Codes The usual way of expressing a decimal number in terms of a binary number is known as pure binary coding and is discussed in the Number Systems section. A number of other techniques can be used to represent a decimal number. These are summari 2 1 PSOjdcionj]ok]po 03/12/2010 01:07PM
Last Post by PSOjdcionj]ok]po
Binary Codes The usual way of expressing a decimal number in terms of a binary number is known as pure binary coding and is discussed in the Number Systems section. A number of other techniques can be used to represent a decimal number. These are summari 1 1 Binary Codes The usual way of expressing a decimal number in terms of a binary number is known as pure binary coding and is discussed in the Number Systems section. A number of other techniques can be used to represent a decimal number. These are summaris 03/12/2010 01:06PM
Last Post by Binary Codes The usual way of expressing a decimal number in terms of a binary number is known as pure binary coding and is discussed in the Number Systems section. A number of other techniques can be used to represent a decimal number. These are summaris
Binary Codes The usual way of expressing a decimal number in terms of a binary number is known as pure binary coding and is discussed in the Number Systems section. A number of other techniques can be used to represent a decimal number. These are summari 2 1 Binary Codes The usual way of expressing a decimal number in terms of a binary number is known as pure binary coding and is discussed in the Number Systems section. A number of other techniques can be used to represent a decimal number. These are summaris 03/12/2010 01:05PM
Last Post by Binary Codes The usual way of expressing a decimal number in terms of a binary number is known as pure binary coding and is discussed in the Number Systems section. A number of other techniques can be used to represent a decimal number. These are summaris
Binary Codes The usual way of expressing a decimal number in terms of a binary number is known as pure binary coding and is discussed in the Number Systems section. A number of other techniques can be used to represent a decimal number. These are summari 1 1 Binary Codes The usual way of expressing a decimal number in terms of a binary number is known as pure binary coding and is discussed in the Number Systems section. A number of other techniques can be used to represent a decimal number. These are summaris 03/12/2010 01:03PM
Last Post by Binary Codes The usual way of expressing a decimal number in terms of a binary number is known as pure binary coding and is discussed in the Number Systems section. A number of other techniques can be used to represent a decimal number. These are summaris
Binary Codes The usual way of expressing a decimal number in terms of a binary number is known as pure binary coding and is discussed in the Number Systems section. A number of other techniques can be used to represent a decimal number. These are summari 3 1 Binary Codes The usual way of expressing a decimal number in terms of a binary number is known as pure binary coding and is discussed in the Number Systems section. A number of other techniques can be used to represent a decimal number. These are summaris 03/12/2010 01:02PM
Last Post by Binary Codes The usual way of expressing a decimal number in terms of a binary number is known as pure binary coding and is discussed in the Number Systems section. A number of other techniques can be used to represent a decimal number. These are summaris
Binary Codes The usual way of expressing a decimal number in terms of a binary number is known as pure binary coding and is discussed in the Number Systems section. A number of other techniques can be used to represent a decimal number. These are summari 2 1 Binary Codes The usual way of expressing a decimal number in terms of a binary number is known as pure binary coding and is discussed in the Number Systems section. A number of other techniques can be used to represent a decimal number. These are summaris 03/12/2010 01:01PM
Last Post by Binary Codes The usual way of expressing a decimal number in terms of a binary number is known as pure binary coding and is discussed in the Number Systems section. A number of other techniques can be used to represent a decimal number. These are summaris
Binary Codes The usual way of expressing a decimal number in terms of a binary number is known as pure binary coding and is discussed in the Number Systems section. A number of other techniques can be used to represent a decimal number. These are summari 1 1 V493940b 03/12/2010 01:00PM
Last Post by V493940b
VBinary Codes The usual way of expressing a decimal number in terms of a binary number is known as pure binary coding and is discussed in the Number Systems section. A number of other techniques can be used to represent a decimal number. These are summar 2 1 5944 03/12/2010 12:59PM
Last Post by 5944
Binary Codes The usual way of expressing a decimal number in terms of a binary number is known as pure binary coding and is discussed in the Number Systems section. A number of other techniques can be used to represent a decimal number. These are summari 5 1 49584a 03/12/2010 12:58PM
Last Post by 49584a
Binary Codes The usual way of expressing a decimal number in terms of a binary number is known as pure binary coding and is discussed in the Number Systems section. A number of other techniques can be used to represent a decimal number. These are summari 3 1 9898 03/12/2010 12:57PM
Last Post by 9898
unk code fuzzy transformation (JCFT) is one of the effective approaches of the code obfuscation technology. Based on the analysis of current junk code strategies, this paper presents a new method named junk code encryption algorithm of subroutine, and dep 3 1 49494 03/12/2010 12:56PM
Last Post by 49494
unk code fuzzy transformation (JCFT) is one of the effective approaches of the code obfuscation technology. Based on the analysis of current junk code strategies, this paper presents a new method named junk code encryption algorithm of subroutine, and dep 3 1 498583 03/12/2010 12:55PM
Last Post by 498583
Breaking News, Weather, Business, Health, Entertainment, Sports, Politics, Travel, Science, Technology, Local, US & World News- msnbc.comBreaking News, Weather, Business, Health, Entertainment, Sports, Politics, Travel, Science, Technology, Local, US & World News- msnbc.comErowid Freedom & Law Vault

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Another failed DOS attempt...
Posted by: Gonads & Strife ()
Date: March 12, 2010 01:21PM

buster gonads is a stupid name...

Gaynads & Strapon was funnier

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Another failed DOS attempt...
Posted by: Registered Voter ()
Date: March 12, 2010 01:26PM

Gonads & Strife Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> buster gonads is a stupid name...
>
> Gaynads & Strapon was funnier

This ding dong is FAIL in every way. I almost have pity on the turd.

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Another failed DOS attempt...
Posted by: Registered Voter ()
Date: March 12, 2010 01:27PM

Even more funny - it takes him like 10 minutes just to make 1 new post lol.

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Another failed DOS attempt...
Posted by: Gonads & Strife ()
Date: March 12, 2010 01:36PM

To the forum flooding cock-washer
Attachments:
vader-fail.jpg

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Another failed DOS attempt...
Posted by: tomahawk ()
Date: March 12, 2010 07:07PM

A DOS attack? I thought that was superceded by the more advanced Windows 95 attack.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Another failed DOS attempt...
Posted by: Gravis ()
Date: March 13, 2010 11:15AM

tomahawk Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> A DOS attack? I thought that was superceded by the
> more advanced Windows 95 attack.


DoS attacks were superseded by DDoS attack and depending on how effective you think it is, PDoS attacks.


consider the funny in your post officially murdered.


"the wisdom of the wise will perish, the intelligence of the intelligent will vanish."095042938540

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Another failed DOS attempt...
Posted by: tomahawk ()
Date: March 13, 2010 12:06PM


Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Another failed DOS attempt...
Posted by: MrMephisto ()
Date: March 13, 2010 01:12PM

I thought a true DOS attack would prevent access to this site totally, not just fuck up the formatting and make it mildly inconvenient to read threads.

--------------------------------------------------------------
13 4826 0948 82695 25847. Yes.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Another failed DOS attempt...
Posted by: bdimag ()
Date: March 13, 2010 01:21PM

i believe thats where the word n00b comes in...

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Another failed DOS attempt...
Posted by: Gravis ()
Date: March 13, 2010 03:57PM

MrMephisto Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I thought a true DOS attack would prevent access
> to this site totally, not just fuck up the
> formatting and make it mildly inconvenient to read
> threads.


it all depends on what you consider to be a Denial of Service. i guess this would account as a denial of good service.


"the wisdom of the wise will perish, the intelligence of the intelligent will vanish."095042938540

Options: ReplyQuote


Your Name: 
Your Email (Optional): 
Subject: 
Attach a file
  • No file can be larger than 75 MB
  • All files together cannot be larger than 300 MB
  • 30 more file(s) can be attached to this message
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **    **  ********   **     **  ********   **     ** 
 ***   **  **     **   **   **   **     **  **     ** 
 ****  **  **     **    ** **    **     **  **     ** 
 ** ** **  **     **     ***     ********   **     ** 
 **  ****  **     **    ** **    **          **   **  
 **   ***  **     **   **   **   **           ** **   
 **    **  ********   **     **  **            ***    
This forum powered by Phorum.