libs run early and often Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Question for Trumpers Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > many options in our arsenal Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Question for Trumpers Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > Let's assume that inviting the Taliban to
> > Camp
> > > > David around 9/11 was a good idea. Trump
> > seems
> > > to
> > > > think so.
> > > >
> > > > Let's also assume that disinviting the
> > Taliban
> > > was
> > > > a good idea. Again, Trump seems to think
> it
> > > was.
> > > >
> > > > What now? Surge troops to Afghanistan?
> Cut
> > > and
> > > > run? Rage tweet at Muslims?
> > > >
> > > > What is Plan B, Trumpers?
> > >
> > >
> > > Start carpet bombing Taliban strongholds.
> The
> > > dinks didn't come to the negotiation table
> > until
> > > Nixon started bombing Hanoi. When a
> > first-world
> > > military is engaged with asymmetrical warfare
> > with
> > > 3rd world shiteaters, you have to use
> superior
> > > firepower to overwhelming hurt the adversary
> to
> > > the point it's not worth it to keep the
> status
> > > quo.
> > >
> > > No more troops (surge in your words). Not
> > Trump's
> > > style. That was the Bush/Cheney model.
> Obama
> > > would have just gone through with the deal
> > anyway
> > > (cut and run as you say). We'll see what
> Trump
> > > does, but it probably will be an escalation
> of
> > > drone attacks and bombers to let the taliban
> > see
> > > what awaits endless small potato one off
> > terrorist
> > > attacks.
> > >
> > >
> >
>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_active_Unite
>
> >
> > > d_States_military_aircraft
> >
> > When will this bombing start? I'm just a
> libtard,
> > but it seems to me that hitting them hard as
> soon
> > after they act out as possible is the way
> bombing
> > them would work best. But there is even a
> bigger
> > problem. Afghanistan has been bombed by
> someone
> > continuously since 1979, including the last two
> > years by Trump. A good definition of insanity
> is
> > repeatedly doing the same thing while expecting
> a
> > different result.
> >
> > But who are we kidding? Trump does not have
> the
> > attention span nor the creative intelligence to
> > see this through. Just another thing the next
> Dem
> > POTUS will have to clean up
>
>
> As you wrote, you are a libtard so of course you
> don't know facts. We have massively decreased our
> bombing campaign in Afghanistan under Trump as we
> try to negotiate a peace deal. Trump cranked them
> up in 2017 through 2018 and that brought the
> taliban to the table. Then he decreased them and
> they got cocky and started terrorist bombing
> again. Time to crank them back up again.
>
> Because you don't know shit and therefore, hate
> actual answers speaks volumes. Mostly, that you
> should be ignored.
America's prestige is on the line. And more importantly, Trump's prestige is on the line. The longer he waits, the more the world will see him as the pussy he is.
Nope, with Trump it will be cut and run. He may just pretend the problem has gone away for awhile, but, in the end, he will choose bankruptcy. Punt the problem to someone else. And then criticize the families of soldiers who died there because one of them wondered for what purpose did they give their child.
Cut and run is who Trump is.