It seems like we get examples of Big Tech political bias on a near-weekly basis these days, but this week’s example (courtesy of Project Veritas) really takes the cake: an insanely arrogant Google bigwig’s videoed admission that the company’s objective for 2020 is to take advantage of their domination of the information space to prevent another “Trump Situation,” aka ensure a Democratic President wins the next election without fail this time.

MOAR:

http://www.redwhiteandfyou.com/google-exec-caught-manipulating-election-with-anti-trump-algorithms/

Here is a 120 page PDF of what was leaked to PV by a Google Employee.

120 pages of confidential election meddling documents from google leaked by Project Veritas.

https://www.projectveritas.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/SS1DocDump.pdf

https://www.bitchute.com/channel/enCP7veavtI1/

Also:

Here is a 120 page PDF of what was leaked to PV by a Google Employee.

120 pages of confidential election meddling documents from google leaked by Project Veritas.

https://www.projectveritas.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/SS1DocDump.pdf

Great job, keep it going.

Project Veritas. You have got to be kidding. Can’t trust a single thing they do or promote.

Brave Browser
ProtonMail
Startpage Search

Why do these smart successful people dislike trump?

Google bosses are smart Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Why do these smart successful people dislike
> trump?


Because he represents the American people and he's not a globalist pig that can be bought. He's an American.

President Trump FTW! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Google bosses are smart Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Why do these smart successful people dislike
> > trump?
>
>
> Because he represents the American people and he's
> not a globalist pig that can be bought. He's an
> American.

That doesn't answer the question. Why are all the most intelligent people against him? Surely, if Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, a Stephen Hawking or Warren Buffett had nice things to say about him, that'd be one thing, but none of them do. Not a one. No major player in academia, major industry or science agrees with his policies.

STOP USING GOOGLE Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Brave Browser
> ProtonMail
> Startpage Search

Biggest sources that give away your information to hackers.

Berkshire Haddaway Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> President Trump FTW! Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Google bosses are smart Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Why do these smart successful people dislike
> > > trump?
> >
> >
> > Because he represents the American people and
> he's
> > not a globalist pig that can be bought. He's an
> > American.
>
> That doesn't answer the question. Why are all the
> most intelligent people against him? Surely, if
> Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, a Stephen Hawking or Warren
> Buffett had nice things to say about him, that'd
> be one thing, but none of them do. Not a one. No
> major player in academia, major industry or
> science agrees with his policies.

It only took 3 meetings with Trump for all the top CEO's Trump assembled to bail and call Trump inept for the presidency.

Bill Gates says Trump asked the difference between HIV and HPV. Gates said he thought Trump was joking at first but Trump was serious.

Fools Born Every Minute Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> STOP USING GOOGLE Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Brave Browser
> > ProtonMail
> > Startpage Search
>
> Biggest sources that give away your information to
> hackers.

You're stupid.

Like the GOP and Dems haven't been manipulating elections since the beginning of time. HA!

The GOP has been caught red handed, over and over again, gerrymandering voting districts in their favor, passing laws to restrict voting access, selectively closing down voting places, decreasing the number of voting locations, etc.

The GOP has been caught red handed trying to skew the Census with citizenship questions to rig the vote.

The GOP 2016 Presidential election even benefited from aid of a multi-million dollar Russian GRU hacking assault manned by thousands of paid Russian cyber-warriors.

FAIL! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Project Veritas. You have got to be kidding.
> Can’t trust a single thing they do or promote.


^^^ blindly believes Google, the most corrupt, evil, globalist piece-of-shit corporation out there. Fuck you sheeple

Crazy Ivan Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Like the GOP and Dems haven't been manipulating
> elections since the beginning of time. HA!
>
> The GOP has been caught red handed, over and over
> again, gerrymandering voting districts in their
> favor, passing laws to restrict voting access,
> selectively closing down voting places, decreasing
> the number of voting locations, etc.
>
> The GOP has been caught red handed trying to skew
> the Census with citizenship questions to rig the
> vote.
>
> The GOP 2016 Presidential election even benefited
> from aid of a multi-million dollar Russian GRU
> hacking assault manned by thousands of paid
> Russian cyber-warriors.


Well, you certainly are crazy. Did you know that LA county has to scrub 1.2 million voters from their voting roles this year because the names couldn't be validated? According to the law suit, it is estimated that at least 100,000 of those names have had votes cast since 2008. Asshole.

Don’t be hypocrites. Russia helped trump in 2016. Our intelligence backed that up, so did mueller report

So what? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Don’t be hypocrites. Russia helped trump in
> 2016. Our intelligence backed that up, so did
> mueller report

All based on the phoney Dossier and DNC computers that were not inspected by the FBI

Barr is looking into whether the entire thing is a hoax. The prosecutions Meuller attempted involved Russians organizing anti Trump protests during the inauguration.

There is hell to pay and timing it perfectly for 2020.

So what? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Don’t be hypocrites. Russia helped trump in
> 2016. Our intelligence backed that up, so did
> mueller report


Dude, the whole Russian collusion story is a dry well. Russia tries to affect every US election and has for decades. So is China. Their goal is to foster discord to weaken the US from within (obviously working).

Russia also helped Hillary, indirectly giving her campaign dirt on Trump (almost all of it totally fabricated) routed through a British ex-spy.

Putin didn't really care who won - he just wanted to fuck with us. Douche bags like you can't see the truth. You are the problem with this country. Move on shithead.

So what? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Don’t be hypocrites. Russia helped trump in
> 2016. Our intelligence backed that up, so did
> mueller report

How did they do that?? I mean even Obama disagrees with you.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T1409sXBleg

Sure even Vladimir hated Hillary Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> So what? Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Don’t be hypocrites. Russia helped trump in
> > 2016. Our intelligence backed that up, so did
> > mueller report
>
>
> Dude, the whole Russian collusion story is a dry
> well. Russia tries to affect every US election
> and has for decades. So is China. Their goal is
> to foster discord to weaken the US from within
> (obviously working).
>
> Russia also helped Hillary, indirectly giving her
> campaign dirt on Trump (almost all of it totally
> fabricated) routed through a British ex-spy.
>
> Putin didn't really care who won - he just wanted
> to fuck with us. Douche bags like you can't see
> the truth. You are the problem with this country.
> Move on shithead.

Let's assume you are right about all of that. Do you find it an acceptable state of affairs?

I consider all of what you say to be just as bad as illegals voting. Not that Trump has done a damn thing about that, either.

Just for laughs Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Sure even Vladimir hated Hillary Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > So what? Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Don’t be hypocrites. Russia helped trump in
> > > 2016. Our intelligence backed that up, so did
> > > mueller report
> >
> >
> > Dude, the whole Russian collusion story is a
> dry
> > well. Russia tries to affect every US election
> > and has for decades. So is China. Their goal
> is
> > to foster discord to weaken the US from within
> > (obviously working).
> >
> > Russia also helped Hillary, indirectly giving
> her
> > campaign dirt on Trump (almost all of it
> totally
> > fabricated) routed through a British ex-spy.
> >
> > Putin didn't really care who won - he just
> wanted
> > to fuck with us. Douche bags like you can't
> see
> > the truth. You are the problem with this
> country.
> > Move on shithead.
>
> Let's assume you are right about all of that. Do
> you find it an acceptable state of affairs?
>
> I consider all of what you say to be just as bad
> as illegals voting. Not that Trump has done a
> damn thing about that, either.

Better question: do YOU find it an acceptable state of affairs that you would have sat on your hands if had Hillary won?

Also: do you consider it acceptable that we, the U.S. has a long history of intervening in elections?

Also: do you consider the shenanigans WRT Hillary displacing Bernie through super delegates acceptable?

Also: do you have some formula that tells you how much the "intervention" in our election changed numbers, or would Trump have won either way?

Also: why do you complain EVERY FUCKING TIME you lose an election? I can't remember any amount near the whining when Obama won, but when GWB won against Gore, same fucking tune including attempting to have SCOTUS intervene. Do you ever accept the results when you lose, or do you wanna trophy every fucking election?

Just for shitz and giggles Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Just for laughs Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Sure even Vladimir hated Hillary Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > So what? Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > Don’t be hypocrites. Russia helped trump
> in
> > > > 2016. Our intelligence backed that up, so
> did
> > > > mueller report
> > >
> > >
> > > Dude, the whole Russian collusion story is a
> > dry
> > > well. Russia tries to affect every US
> election
> > > and has for decades. So is China. Their
> goal
> > is
> > > to foster discord to weaken the US from
> within
> > > (obviously working).
> > >
> > > Russia also helped Hillary, indirectly giving
> > her
> > > campaign dirt on Trump (almost all of it
> > totally
> > > fabricated) routed through a British ex-spy.
> > >
> > > Putin didn't really care who won - he just
> > wanted
> > > to fuck with us. Douche bags like you can't
> > see
> > > the truth. You are the problem with this
> > country.
> > > Move on shithead.
> >
> > Let's assume you are right about all of that.
> Do
> > you find it an acceptable state of affairs?
> >
> > I consider all of what you say to be just as
> bad
> > as illegals voting. Not that Trump has done a
> > damn thing about that, either.
>
> Better question: do YOU find it an acceptable
> state of affairs that you would have sat on your
> hands if had Hillary won?
>
> Also: do you consider it acceptable that we, the
> U.S. has a long history of intervening in
> elections?
>
> Also: do you consider the shenanigans WRT Hillary
> displacing Bernie through super delegates
> acceptable?
>
> Also: do you have some formula that tells you how
> much the "intervention" in our election changed
> numbers, or would Trump have won either way?
>
> Also: why do you complain EVERY FUCKING TIME you
> lose an election? I can't remember any amount near
> the whining when Obama won, but when GWB won
> against Gore, same fucking tune including
> attempting to have SCOTUS intervene. Do you ever
> accept the results when you lose, or do you wanna
> trophy every fucking election?

A lot to unpack here. Lets give it a try:

1. Regarding Hillary winning: Hillary did not "win", so you are asking me (somewhat incoherently) about something that did not happen. It is therefore an essentially irrelevant question. But had I seen evidence of her criminality of the quality that was contained in the Mueller report about Trump, I would have wanted her gone. That type of evidence, to date, has not yet surfaced about her, although I understand you guys are still "investigating", and I suspect she is in fact guilty of something. Best answer I can give

2. No, I do not consider it acceptable that the US has a long history of fucking around in other peoples elections, although for different reasons than it pisses me off that others are dicking around with ours. I fully admit that it pisses me off more that foreigners fuck with us than we fuck with them. American elections are just more important to this American.

3. I am making the assumption from the nature of your post that you are not a Dem. With that in mind, the answer to your question regarding Bernie is that it is none of your fucking business. Dems will work that out amongst themselves. If you are a Dem, please let me know and I will answer your question more fully.

4. I don't have a magic formula to tell if the Russian interference, that was designed to benefit Trump, was successful. Don't have one that says it wasn't. And that is the problem. We are a horribly divided country, an even a relative handful of votes can have an outsized impact. Trump is, at a minimum, an incompetent asshole, but I would rather have a Republican President Trump who was elected by Americans than a Democrat President (fill in the blank) who was elected with foreign "assistance". I hope you, as a presumably American citizen, would feel the same about the opposite, that you would want a Democrat elected by Americans rather than a Republican elected with foreign help. But I don't know you well enough to evaluate your patriotism and love of country, and if I am wrong about you, I certainly hope you do not represent Trump supporters as a whole.

5. Which brings us to your question about the left complaining about election results. When a Republican actually gets more votes than the Democrat, the Democrats do not generally contest the results (see, for example 1968, 1972, 1980, 1984, 1988 and 2004.) But in elections where the Dems actually got more votes, there are concerns, such as that the Republican were suppressing votes (Florida 2000) or conspiring with a foreign government (2016). The Dems may well be wrong (an example would probably be Florida on 2000, I don't think if they had actually counted the votes it would have made a difference), but I don't think it is unreasonable for Dems to want to confirm that the election results, especially under those circumstances, are untainted. I can only imagine how much the right would squeal if the roles were reversed. Please keep in mind that the left no more trusts the right in this country than the right trusts the left. We believe that you guys cheat. We may be wrong, but the right has done absolutely nothing in this century that would give the left reason to trust.

So, while your post is basically nothing more than a deflection from the issues I have raised, I have tried to answer your questions. Now, how about mine. Do you consider it acceptable that foreigners are dicking around with our elections? Yes or No. If you consider it acceptable, I can't help you, and if you are in any way representative of the right in that sense America is in a lot bigger trouble than even I would have imagined. If you consider it unacceptable, I apologize if I have insulted you in anyway, but I would have one further question. What has Mr. Trump, who has been President of the US the last 2 1/2 years, done about it? He took an oath, but I see no evidence he takes it seriously

One more note to the other Trump supporters on this board. This guy is a bit unhinged, but at least he is trying. I suspect that, if he had a gun to his head, he would admit that he feels it is Ok for foreigners to dick with our elections as long as they do it on the right side. Is this representative of Trump supporters as a whole? Just curious.

Bump

C'mon, dude, grow a pair. I know I may seem like a scary liberal, but I really am not that bad a guy. Besides, you are (I assume) a proud conservative, raised on teh tradition of rugged American individualism. Surely you are not afraid of a cuck libtard like me.

I know you are out there. Stop being such a pussy.

Just for laughs Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> A lot to unpack here. Lets give it a try:
>
> 1. Regarding Hillary winning: Hillary did not
> "win", so you are asking me (somewhat
> incoherently) about something that did not happen.
> It is therefore an essentially irrelevant
> question. But had I seen evidence of her
> criminality of the quality that was contained in
> the Mueller report about Trump, I would have
> wanted her gone. That type of evidence, to date,
> has not yet surfaced about her, although I
> understand you guys are still "investigating", and
> I suspect she is in fact guilty of something.
> Best answer I can give
>
> 2. No, I do not consider it acceptable that the
> US has a long history of fucking around in other
> peoples elections, although for different reasons
> than it pisses me off that others are dicking
> around with ours. I fully admit that it pisses me
> off more that foreigners fuck with us than we fuck
> with them. American elections are just more
> important to this American.
>
> 3. I am making the assumption from the nature of
> your post that you are not a Dem. With that in
> mind, the answer to your question regarding Bernie
> is that it is none of your fucking business. Dems
> will work that out amongst themselves. If you are
> a Dem, please let me know and I will answer your
> question more fully.
>
> 4. I don't have a magic formula to tell if the
> Russian interference, that was designed to benefit
> Trump, was successful. Don't have one that says
> it wasn't. And that is the problem. We are a
> horribly divided country, an even a relative
> handful of votes can have an outsized impact.
> Trump is, at a minimum, an incompetent asshole,
> but I would rather have a Republican President
> Trump who was elected by Americans than a Democrat
> President (fill in the blank) who was elected with
> foreign "assistance". I hope you, as a presumably
> American citizen, would feel the same about the
> opposite, that you would want a Democrat elected
> by Americans rather than a Republican elected with
> foreign help. But I don't know you well enough to
> evaluate your patriotism and love of country, and
> if I am wrong about you, I certainly hope you do
> not represent Trump supporters as a whole.
>
> 5. Which brings us to your question about the
> left complaining about election results. When a
> Republican actually gets more votes than the
> Democrat, the Democrats do not generally contest
> the results (see, for example 1968, 1972, 1980,
> 1984, 1988 and 2004.) But in elections where the
> Dems actually got more votes, there are concerns,
> such as that the Republican were suppressing votes
> (Florida 2000) or conspiring with a foreign
> government (2016). The Dems may well be wrong (an
> example would probably be Florida on 2000, I don't
> think if they had actually counted the votes it
> would have made a difference), but I don't think
> it is unreasonable for Dems to want to confirm
> that the election results, especially under those
> circumstances, are untainted. I can only imagine
> how much the right would squeal if the roles were
> reversed. Please keep in mind that the left no
> more trusts the right in this country than the
> right trusts the left. We believe that you guys
> cheat. We may be wrong, but the right has done
> absolutely nothing in this century that would give
> the left reason to trust.
>
> So, while your post is basically nothing more than
> a deflection from the issues I have raised, I have
> tried to answer your questions. Now, how about
> mine. Do you consider it acceptable that
> foreigners are dicking around with our elections?
> Yes or No. If you consider it acceptable, I can't
> help you, and if you are in any way representative
> of the right in that sense America is in a lot
> bigger trouble than even I would have imagined.
> If you consider it unacceptable, I apologize if I
> have insulted you in anyway, but I would have one
> further question. What has Mr. Trump, who has been
> President of the US the last 2 1/2 years, done
> about it? He took an oath, but I see no evidence
> he takes it seriously
>
> One more note to the other Trump supporters on
> this board. This guy is a bit unhinged, but at
> least he is trying. I suspect that, if he had a
> gun to his head, he would admit that he feels it
> is Ok for foreigners to dick with our elections as
> long as they do it on the right side. Is this
> representative of Trump supporters as a whole?
> Just curious.

1. There is a complete conflating of "foreigners" and "foreign governments." There is a difference you know. I don't have a problem with an average foreign citizen who is interested in our election commenting or memeing about a US election. But if it is an organized systematic effort sponsored or paid for by an actual foreign government then of course I would oppose that. Even a private non-governmental organization from a foreign country that tries to influence our election should not be allowed. But it is foolish to think that 2016 is the first time things like this have happened.

2. To date I have not seen any convincing evidence that Russia effectively "interfered" with the 2016 election. The situations pointed to by Mueller and the media are completely weak sauce. No actual shut down proof it was Russians or no evidence their influencing efforts had any significant affect.

Alright, we are getting somewhere.

1. I agree that foreigners and foreign governments represent a qualitative difference in scope of the problem, although I am a bit stumped as to how you draw a line between permissible activity for foreigners and what is not permitted. And you may well be right, 2016 was not the first time. But I am persuaded that it was the largest such attempt in my lifetime, and that social media is a real force multiplier for these kinds of efforts. My concern is not so much with what happened previously, but whether we as Americans accept this as OK, as part of the process. That is the basis for the question I have raised.

2. I am not sure how one would ever be able to objectively state whether Russian interference was effective, or not. I do know this, though. Mueller, as well as Pompeo and others in the Trump administration (notably, not Trump) have indicated that the Russian went to serious lengths to influence the 2016 election, and will in all likelihood try again. The possibility that they may have been successful, or will succeed in the future, while certainly not proven, is real, and I would argue that President Trump in derelict in the duties he swore an oath to assume by a) not calling it what it is (sound familiar?) and b) not taking all appropriate steps to safeguard the process in the future.

Thanks for your response. Unfortunately, it really did not answer my question, but I appreciate the input.

Just for laughs Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Just for shitz and giggles Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Just for laughs Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Sure even Vladimir hated Hillary Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > So what? Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > Don’t be hypocrites. Russia helped
> trump
> > in
> > > > > 2016. Our intelligence backed that up, so
> > did
> > > > > mueller report
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Dude, the whole Russian collusion story is
> a
> > > dry
> > > > well. Russia tries to affect every US
> > election
> > > > and has for decades. So is China. Their
> > goal
> > > is
> > > > to foster discord to weaken the US from
> > within
> > > > (obviously working).
> > > >
> > > > Russia also helped Hillary, indirectly
> giving
> > > her
> > > > campaign dirt on Trump (almost all of it
> > > totally
> > > > fabricated) routed through a British
> ex-spy.
> > > >
> > > > Putin didn't really care who won - he just
> > > wanted
> > > > to fuck with us. Douche bags like you
> can't
> > > see
> > > > the truth. You are the problem with this
> > > country.
> > > > Move on shithead.
> > >
> > > Let's assume you are right about all of that.
>
> > Do
> > > you find it an acceptable state of affairs?
> > >
> > > I consider all of what you say to be just as
> > bad
> > > as illegals voting. Not that Trump has done
> a
> > > damn thing about that, either.
> >
> > Better question: do YOU find it an acceptable
> > state of affairs that you would have sat on
> your
> > hands if had Hillary won?
> >
> > Also: do you consider it acceptable that we,
> the
> > U.S. has a long history of intervening in
> > elections?
> >
> > Also: do you consider the shenanigans WRT
> Hillary
> > displacing Bernie through super delegates
> > acceptable?
> >
> > Also: do you have some formula that tells you
> how
> > much the "intervention" in our election changed
> > numbers, or would Trump have won either way?
> >
> > Also: why do you complain EVERY FUCKING TIME
> you
> > lose an election? I can't remember any amount
> near
> > the whining when Obama won, but when GWB won
> > against Gore, same fucking tune including
> > attempting to have SCOTUS intervene. Do you
> ever
> > accept the results when you lose, or do you
> wanna
> > trophy every fucking election?
>
> A lot to unpack here. Lets give it a try:
>
> 1. Regarding Hillary winning: Hillary did not
> "win", so you are asking me (somewhat
> incoherently) about something that did not happen.
> It is therefore an essentially irrelevant
> question. But had I seen evidence of her
> criminality of the quality that was contained in
> the Mueller report about Trump, I would have
> wanted her gone. That type of evidence, to date,
> has not yet surfaced about her, although I
> understand you guys are still "investigating", and
> I suspect she is in fact guilty of something.
> Best answer I can give
>
> 2. No, I do not consider it acceptable that the
> US has a long history of fucking around in other
> peoples elections, although for different reasons
> than it pisses me off that others are dicking
> around with ours. I fully admit that it pisses me
> off more that foreigners fuck with us than we fuck
> with them. American elections are just more
> important to this American.
>
> 3. I am making the assumption from the nature of
> your post that you are not a Dem. With that in
> mind, the answer to your question regarding Bernie
> is that it is none of your fucking business. Dems
> will work that out amongst themselves. If you are
> a Dem, please let me know and I will answer your
> question more fully.
>
> 4. I don't have a magic formula to tell if the
> Russian interference, that was designed to benefit
> Trump, was successful. Don't have one that says
> it wasn't. And that is the problem. We are a
> horribly divided country, an even a relative
> handful of votes can have an outsized impact.
> Trump is, at a minimum, an incompetent asshole,
> but I would rather have a Republican President
> Trump who was elected by Americans than a Democrat
> President (fill in the blank) who was elected with
> foreign "assistance". I hope you, as a presumably
> American citizen, would feel the same about the
> opposite, that you would want a Democrat elected
> by Americans rather than a Republican elected with
> foreign help. But I don't know you well enough to
> evaluate your patriotism and love of country, and
> if I am wrong about you, I certainly hope you do
> not represent Trump supporters as a whole.
>
> 5. Which brings us to your question about the
> left complaining about election results. When a
> Republican actually gets more votes than the
> Democrat, the Democrats do not generally contest
> the results (see, for example 1968, 1972, 1980,
> 1984, 1988 and 2004.) But in elections where the
> Dems actually got more votes, there are concerns,
> such as that the Republican were suppressing votes
> (Florida 2000) or conspiring with a foreign
> government (2016). The Dems may well be wrong (an
> example would probably be Florida on 2000, I don't
> think if they had actually counted the votes it
> would have made a difference), but I don't think
> it is unreasonable for Dems to want to confirm
> that the election results, especially under those
> circumstances, are untainted. I can only imagine
> how much the right would squeal if the roles were
> reversed. Please keep in mind that the left no
> more trusts the right in this country than the
> right trusts the left. We believe that you guys
> cheat. We may be wrong, but the right has done
> absolutely nothing in this century that would give
> the left reason to trust.
>
> So, while your post is basically nothing more than
> a deflection from the issues I have raised, I have
> tried to answer your questions. Now, how about
> mine. Do you consider it acceptable that
> foreigners are dicking around with our elections?
> Yes or No. If you consider it acceptable, I can't
> help you, and if you are in any way representative
> of the right in that sense America is in a lot
> bigger trouble than even I would have imagined.
> If you consider it unacceptable, I apologize if I
> have insulted you in anyway, but I would have one
> further question. What has Mr. Trump, who has been
> President of the US the last 2 1/2 years, done
> about it? He took an oath, but I see no evidence
> he takes it seriously
>
> One more note to the other Trump supporters on
> this board. This guy is a bit unhinged, but at
> least he is trying. I suspect that, if he had a
> gun to his head, he would admit that he feels it
> is Ok for foreigners to dick with our elections as
> long as they do it on the right side. Is this
> representative of Trump supporters as a whole?
> Just curious.

1) No, it is a relevant question because it goes to the state of your mind and motive. Would you voice concern had Hillary won or is this really about Donald Trump rather than election "meddling" not going your way?

2) "I fully admit that it pisses me off more that foreigners fuck with us than we fuck with them. American elections are just more important to this American". All you're telling me is that you're a creature of hypocritical convenience. Sorry your gal lost, but really, she did it by being an unlikable shithead.

"You know, to just be grossly generalistic, you could put half of Trump's supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables. (Laughter/applause) Right? (Laughter/applause) They're racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic – Islamophobic – you name it. And unfortunately, there are people like that. And he has lifted them up. He has given voice to their websites that used to only have 11,000 people – now have 11 million. He tweets and retweets their offensive hateful mean-spirited rhetoric. Now, some of those folks – they are irredeemable, but thankfully, they are not America. " - some fucking Arkansas cunt.

3) "Bernie is that it is none of your fucking business. Dems will work that out amongst themselves. " Cock gobblers like you always show their stripes. With you, the ends justify the means. The democratic party is very undemocratic and you know it. And you're god-damned right, I'm not a democrat. I would never be one to begin with.

4) Yes, you don't have a formula. Yes, we're horribly divided. Blame yourselves for pushing idiotic identity politics for thirty plus years and people said fuck it, had enough. FBHO. And a BIGGER WTF... when are you going to hold the three democrat morons in Virginia accountable for their actions in blackface or dressing up in KKK garb and raping people? Still in office, shithead.

5) See the electoral college. Don't like it, too fucking bad. Change the Constitution. And don't lecture ANYONE on foreign help in elections or cheating. You assholes literally generate ballots out of thin air again and again and never get called on it.



SOURCE:

https://thefederalistpapers.org/us/deplorables-look-at-all-the-bigots-who-are-funding-hillary





SOURCE:

https://www.informationliberation.com/?id=58189

Just for laughs get her head handed to her yet again

Want less biased search results?

Want your searches to not track you? Save all your searches?

https://duckduckgo.com/

Berkshire Haddaway Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> President Trump FTW! Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Google bosses are smart Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Why do these smart successful people dislike
> > > trump?
> >
> >
> > Because he represents the American people and
> he's
> > not a globalist pig that can be bought. He's an
> > American.
>
> That doesn't answer the question. Why are all the
> most intelligent people against him? Surely, if
> Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, a Stephen Hawking or Warren
> Buffett had nice things to say about him, that'd
> be one thing, but none of them do. Not a one. No
> major player in academia, major industry or
> science agrees with his policies.


Do you have trouble with the English language?

I made it abundantly clear.

Are you libtarded?

It’s simple. God hates Hillary in particular and liberals in general.

Asshole Spotter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Crazy Ivan Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Like the GOP and Dems haven't been manipulating
> > elections since the beginning of time. HA!
> >
> > The GOP has been caught red handed, over and
> over
> > again, gerrymandering voting districts in their
> > favor, passing laws to restrict voting access,
> > selectively closing down voting places,
> decreasing
> > the number of voting locations, etc.
> >
> > The GOP has been caught red handed trying to
> skew
> > the Census with citizenship questions to rig
> the
> > vote.
> >
> > The GOP 2016 Presidential election even
> benefited
> > from aid of a multi-million dollar Russian GRU
> > hacking assault manned by thousands of paid
> > Russian cyber-warriors.
>
>
> Well, you certainly are crazy. Did you know that
> LA county has to scrub 1.2 million voters from
> their voting roles this year because the names
> couldn't be validated? According to the law suit,
> it is estimated that at least 100,000 of those
> names have had votes cast since 2008. Asshole.


Um, people move and die. If they haven't voted in over 10 years, that says over a million possible fraudulent votes each election were never cast.

So what you're saying is that unlike the GOP, Google are actual patriotic Americans? Fine with me. The GOP have pretty well conclusively proven they have no love for this country or understanding of the principles on which it was founded. They're nothing but corporate cocksuckers now. "Please point me toward the nearest corporate cock so that I may suck it," sums up their platform.