Trumptard scum are so dumb lol.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/18/2019 11:12AM by Gerrymanderer2.

The President just confirmed it - No Collusion, No Obstruction!

God Bless America! This is Great News!

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Trumptard scum are so dumb lol.


If we are dumb and we won, what does that make you?

Gerry,

Either leave this great country or get behind YOUR PRESIDENT!

ANOTHER TERM FOR TRUMP! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Gerry,
>
> Either leave this great country or get behind YOUR
> PRESIDENT!
Attachments:

This is truly a day to celebrate! Whether you love the President or not, we can all be happy that there was not collusion or obstruction!

Damn you're fucked. Your ass is fucked.

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Damn you're fucked. Your ass is fucked.


Your goats ass is fucked!

Mueller says he didn't charge president because his crimes were in plain view.

Basically any idiot knows Trump is a criminal lol.

Time to impeach.

I've to admit I am NO fan of this president and I believed they would find collusion AND obstruction. But at the end of the day, it is actually good news that they didn't.

Rudy Giuliani just declared total victory for President Trump and the United States of America.

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Mueller says he didn't charge president because
> his crimes were in plain view.
>
> Basically any idiot knows Trump is a criminal
> lol.
>
> Time to impeach.

Let it go. Just because you don't like someone doesn't mean they are a criminal.

This Changes Everything Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I've to admit I am NO fan of this president and I
> believed they would find collusion AND
> obstruction. But at the end of the day, it is
> actually good news that they didn't.

Except one problem. What you just said is a lie. Mueller says Trump committed obstruction. Wouldn't be interviewed. And collusion is not a crime and charging a president with conspiracy or treason is too high of a bar.

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> This Changes Everything Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I've to admit I am NO fan of this president and
> I
> > believed they would find collusion AND
> > obstruction. But at the end of the day, it is
> > actually good news that they didn't.
>
> Except one problem. What you just said is a lie.
> Mueller says Trump committed obstruction. Wouldn't
> be interviewed. And collusion is not a crime and
> charging a president with conspiracy or treason is
> too high of a bar.

You lost again as always. Sucks to be you.

How long ago did Mueller know there was no collusion and no obstruction? A year ago? More?

lol this is their 2020 candidate. Hahahahaha!!!

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> lol this is their 2020 candidate. Hahahahaha!!!


Beto is going to rape his asshole raw!!!

Can't Wait!!! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > lol this is their 2020 candidate. Hahahahaha!!!
>
>
> Beto is going to rape his asshole raw!!!

You mean you are going to rape your goats asshole raw.

No one else here caught this ditty on page 382 of the report? Really? I thought you were all news hounds!

"Under the office of legal council's analysis,Congress can permisibly criminalize certain obstructive conduct by the President, such as subborning perjury, intimidating witnesses, or fabricating evidence. These prohibitions raise no separation of powers questions."

Barr's interpretation this morning was that he was "the ultimate authority, and not Congress" on prosecution. Really???? That is not what Mueller believes.

I partied with Brett Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> No one else here caught this ditty on page 382 of
> the report? Really? I thought you were all news
> hounds!
>
> "Under the office of legal council's
> analysis,Congress can permisibly criminalize
> certain obstructive conduct by the President, such
> as subborning perjury, intimidating witnesses, or
> fabricating evidence. These prohibitions raise no
> separation of powers questions."
>
> Barr's interpretation this morning was that he was
> "the ultimate authority, and not Congress" on
> prosecution. Really???? That is not what Mueller
> believes.


Mueller Should be in jail

The Big Question Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> How long ago did Mueller know there was no
> collusion and no obstruction? A year ago? More?

There was probable obstruction, you moron. You did not read the report.


From the report, page 382, (unsearchable formated cd). And I quote...

"Under the office of legal council's analysis,Congress can permisibly criminalize certain obstructive conduct by the President, such as subborning perjury, intimidating witnesses, or fabricating evidence. These prohibitions raise no 'separation of powers' questions."

Ejke Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I partied with Brett Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > No one else here caught this ditty on page 382
> of
> > the report? Really? I thought you were all
> news
> > hounds!
> >
> > "Under the office of legal council's
> > analysis,Congress can permisibly criminalize
> > certain obstructive conduct by the President,
> such
> > as subborning perjury, intimidating witnesses,
> or
> > fabricating evidence. These prohibitions raise
> no
> > separation of powers questions."
> >
> > Barr's interpretation this morning was that he
> was
> > "the ultimate authority, and not Congress" on
> > prosecution. Really???? That is not what
> Mueller
> > believes.
>
>
> Mueller Should be in jail


We don't jail for political reasons in this country. Wait, I may be wrong on that. Did Trump recently sign an executive order saying he can do that?

I partied with Brett Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The Big Question Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > How long ago did Mueller know there was no
> > collusion and no obstruction? A year ago?
> More?
>
> There was probable obstruction, you moron. You
> did not read the report.
>
>
> From the report, page 382, (unsearchable formated
> cd). And I quote...
>
> "Under the office of legal council's
> analysis,Congress can permisibly criminalize
> certain obstructive conduct by the President, such
> as subborning perjury, intimidating witnesses, or
> fabricating evidence. These prohibitions raise no
> 'separation of powers' questions."


Okay, so where's your probable obstruction?

I can't even copy and paste from the download of the report from Justice. I can't do a word search either. This sucks. I may have to print and scan it in order to cut and paste, and search. This effort will take hours!

I partied with Brett Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I can't even copy and paste from the download of
> the report from Justice. I can't do a word search
> either. This sucks. I may have to print and scan
> it in order to cut and paste, and search. This
> effort will take hours!


That's okay, just give us the quick version of when Trump probably obstructed.

Perry Mason Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I partied with Brett Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > The Big Question Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > How long ago did Mueller know there was no
> > > collusion and no obstruction? A year ago?
> > More?
> >
> > There was probable obstruction, you moron. You
> > did not read the report.
> >
> >
> > From the report, page 382, (unsearchable
> formated
> > cd). And I quote...
> >
> > "Under the office of legal council's
> > analysis,Congress can permisibly criminalize
> > certain obstructive conduct by the President,
> such
> > as subborning perjury, intimidating witnesses,
> or
> > fabricating evidence. These prohibitions raise
> no
> > 'separation of powers' questions."
>
>
> Okay, so where's your probable obstruction?

Do you have a reading comprehension problem? Read the paragraph again, and again, untill you see the accusations.

I am still printing the report, and my kids are helping by cross referencing with colored pens. I may have to scan most of it in order to do searches. More info later today.

So could you just quickly name one thing he did that was obstruction or do you need your kids to write it in crayon for you?

Knowing full well all they've ever had is lies, Liberals will cling to them with a grip of Grim Death. Looks like it'll be their own death LoL

"What did the senior echelon at the FBI do when they have this highly documented bias toward Donald Trump, did they take inappropriate action to spy on the president and his campaign team? We already know the answer to that is yes."

- Inspector General Michael Horowitz - APPOINTED BY OBAMA


Liberals better dig a hole and pull the dirt in on top of yourselves, this is going to be BIG.

I partied with Brett Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> and my kids are
> helping by cross referencing with colored pens.


All the King's horses and all the King's men

All the College Professors and all of their ken

All the poor brainwashed kids with their colored pens

couldn't put Humpty Lefty back together again

In response to a question about Trump insiders lying to the special council on Russia, Jay Sekulow just said "the president doesn't support anyone telling lies." Nicole Wallace, of camera but miked, laughed. She is on fire today!

Perry Mason Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> So could you just quickly name one thing he did
> that was obstruction or do you need your kids to
> write it in crayon for you?


Page 82,The president directed Don Mcgahn to get Sessions to un-recuse himself. Later the president asked Mcgahn to fire Mueller. Mcgahn wrote up his resignation over the requests he considered "akin" to Nixon's Saturday Night Massacre. Mcgahn ended up taking his concerns to the DoJ.

I am not summarizing the long Corey Lewindowski and the President's conversation on telling Sessions to give a speech on why we don't need a special council. I mean it was mafia like.

That's not obstruction, sorry. Tell your kids to sharpen up their crayons. This could take a while.

This morning, Barr said the White House fully cooperated with the special council. The report said the "White House' response was "insufficient."

What a fucking waste of two plus years. Fucking go away with this Russia shit.

I partied with Brett Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Perry Mason Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > So could you just quickly name one thing he did
> > that was obstruction or do you need your kids
> to
> > write it in crayon for you?
>
>
> Page 82,The president directed Don Mcgahn to get
> Sessions to un-recuse himself. Later the
> president asked Mcgahn to fire Mueller. Mcgahn
> wrote up his resignation over the requests he
> considered "akin" to Nixon's Saturday Night
> Massacre. Mcgahn ended up taking his concerns to
> the DoJ.
>
> I am not summarizing the long Corey Lewindowski
> and the President's conversation on telling
> Sessions to give a speech on why we don't need a
> special council. I mean it was mafia like.

Based on my reading of some of the relevant sections of the MR - Mueller should have been fired. Anyone with an IQ over 100 could easily see in 10 minutes this was all partisan bullshit. Mueller should be subpoenaed. Love to see some GOP congressman question his judgement. And Wiessman.

hne34 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I partied with Brett Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Perry Mason Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > So could you just quickly name one thing he
> did
> > > that was obstruction or do you need your kids
> > to
> > > write it in crayon for you?
> >
> >
> > Page 82,The president directed Don Mcgahn to
> get
> > Sessions to un-recuse himself. Later the
> > president asked Mcgahn to fire Mueller. Mcgahn
> > wrote up his resignation over the requests he
> > considered "akin" to Nixon's Saturday Night
> > Massacre. Mcgahn ended up taking his concerns
> to
> > the DoJ.
> >
> > I am not summarizing the long Corey Lewindowski
> > and the President's conversation on telling
> > Sessions to give a speech on why we don't need
> a
> > special council. I mean it was mafia like.
>
> Based on my reading of some of the relevant
> sections of the MR - Mueller should have been
> fired. Anyone with an IQ over 100 could easily
> see in 10 minutes this was all partisan bullshit.
> Mueller should be subpoenaed. Love to see some
> GOP congressman question his judgement. And
> Wiessman.

As to the relevant sections to which you refer

The fartof the deal Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> This morning, Barr said the White House fully
> cooperated with the special council. The report
> said the "White House' response was
> "insufficient."


Insufficient for them to frame him with a crime. This whole investigation was a political sham. Next phase will be interesting. FISA abuse, spying on the Trump campaign, illegal leaks. The ball is already rolling on this stuff. Can't be stopped now.

Probable Obstruction Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> That's not obstruction, sorry. Tell your kids to
> sharpen up their crayons. This could take a while.

You don't need an outcome for obstruction,
just intent. Mcgahn, at the time of the conversations, felt it was obstruction.

From the report volume 2, page 37."Sessions told the president a special council had been appointed. The President slumped back in his chair and said,'Oh my God, This[sic] is terrible. This[sic] is the end of my Presidency. I am fucked.'"


Stop using the word "that" as a noun. In other words, either use a noun to follow the word "that" when you write, or eliminate the word "that" altogether. In 95 % of the time, the sentence will sound better without the word "that." This rule also applies to the word "this." See what I did here?

By reading your written response, your poor or lazy English jumps out at me, and, I wish not to try interpritating language of substandard written abilities.

Gee thanks. I'll try to interpritate stuff better for you next time. Just let us know when your kids find some actual obstruction.

^ You know THAT you've lost when you're down to criticizing grammar in a forum post.

Deep State Blues Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The fartof the deal Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > This morning, Barr said the White House fully
> > cooperated with the special council. The
> report
> > said the "White House' response was
> > "insufficient."
>
>
> Insufficient for them to frame him with a crime.
> This whole investigation was a political sham.
> Next phase will be interesting. FISA abuse, spying
> on the Trump campaign, illegal leaks. The ball is
> already rolling on this stuff. Can't be stopped
> now.

Nope.

Page 53. The President and others knew Cohen provided false testimony to the council on Trump Tower Moscow. Meaning the President was ok with, and did nothing to try and clarify, lies Cohen made.

Page 54, There was insufficient response from the President on written questions from the special council to the President.

Go read page 55 now.

What report are you reading?

I partied with Brett Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

>
> By reading your written response, your poor or
> lazy English jumps out at me, and, I wish not to
> try interpritating language of substandard written
> abilities.


^ lol

Also that's written like shit and you put unnecessary commas around 'and' btw.

I partied with Brett Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Deep State Blues Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > The fartof the deal Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > This morning, Barr said the White House fully
> > > cooperated with the special council. The
> > report
> > > said the "White House' response was
> > > "insufficient."
> >
> >
> > Insufficient for them to frame him with a
> crime.
> > This whole investigation was a political sham.
> > Next phase will be interesting. FISA abuse,
> spying
> > on the Trump campaign, illegal leaks. The ball
> is
> > already rolling on this stuff. Can't be stopped
> > now.
>
> Nope.
>
> Page 53. The President and others knew Cohen
> provided false testimony to the council on Trump
> Tower Moscow. Meaning the President was ok with,
> and did nothing to try and clarify, lies Cohen
> made.
>
> Page 54, There was insufficient response from the
> President on written questions from the special
> council to the President.
>
> Go read page 55 now.
>
> What report are you reading?


OMG sorry, that's so sad! That's your obstruction? Okay you are clearly having a really bad day. Please don't take it out on your kids. You're making yourself crazy, but that doesn't make it okay to drive them crazy too.

Spin it all you want libtards, you lost again.

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> This Changes Everything Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I've to admit I am NO fan of this president and
> I
> > believed they would find collusion AND
> > obstruction. But at the end of the day, it is
> > actually good news that they didn't.
>
> Except one problem. What you just said is a lie.
> Mueller says Trump committed obstruction. Wouldn't
> be interviewed. And collusion is not a crime and
> charging a president with conspiracy or treason is
> too high of a bar.

Mueller said no such thing. Perhaps if you listened to Barrs unedited presser you'd know that. It's been plainly obvious you have been brainwashed by cnn and msnbc spinning what actually gets said. Here's some advice, go to you tube and listen to the unedited versions of whatever anyone has said. It's very different from what your people say has been said.

Chapter two,page 2, Mueller wrote it was not his job to charge the President, it was the job of the OLC and Congress. He wrote if he did make a charge it would influence the procedure.

Are you on Gerry's legal council? LOL

I partied with Brett Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Chapter two,page 2, Mueller wrote THAT it was not his
> job to charge the President, it was the job of the
> OLC and Congress. He wrote if he did make a charge
> it would influence the procedure.


^ FIFY

It's not his job. Just like it's not his job to exonerate anyone as you dopes are grasping at. So what are you arguing about?

The same people who kept saying show me on shred of evidence of collusion are now saying show one instance of obstruction. I fear they will keep pounding that drum. Putin must be very proud of you.

Hypocrisy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The same people who kept saying show me on shred
> of evidence of collusion are now saying show one
> instance of obstruction. I fear they will keep
> pounding that drum. Putin must be very proud of
> you.


For people to ask for evidence is somehow wrong?

That's bizarre. You live in a different world than actual thinkers.

Keep wriggling on the hook though, it's fun to watch.

TheTroof Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hypocrisy Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > The same people who kept saying show me on
> shred
> > of evidence of collusion are now saying show
> one
> > instance of obstruction. I fear they will keep
> > pounding that drum. Putin must be very proud of
> > you.
>
>
> For people to ask for evidence is somehow wrong?
>
> That's bizarre. You live in a different world than
> actual thinkers.
>
> Keep wriggling on the hook though, it's fun to
> watch.

Libtards don’t care about evidence if it goes against their wishes.

Can't Wait!!! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > lol this is their 2020 candidate. Hahahahaha!!!
>
>
> Beto is going to rape his asshole raw!!!


Beto cuck is gonna do what?

Hypocrisy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The same people who kept saying show me on shred
> of evidence of collusion are now saying show one
> instance of obstruction. I fear they will keep
> pounding that drum. Putin must be very proud of
> you.


And you're unable to do either. lol

Giving up on the shit that you've been fed for the last two years must be hard huh?

I partied with Brett Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Deep State Blues Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > The fartof the deal Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > This morning, Barr said the White House fully
> > > cooperated with the special council. The
> > report
> > > said the "White House' response was
> > > "insufficient."
> >
> >
> > Insufficient for them to frame him with a
> crime.
> > This whole investigation was a political sham.
> > Next phase will be interesting. FISA abuse,
> spying
> > on the Trump campaign, illegal leaks. The ball
> is
> > already rolling on this stuff. Can't be stopped
> > now.
>
> Nope.
>
> Page 53. The President and others knew Cohen
> provided false testimony to the council on Trump
> Tower Moscow. Meaning the President was ok with,
> and did nothing to try and clarify, lies Cohen
> made.
>
> Page 54, There was insufficient response from the
> President on written questions from the special
> council to the President.
>
> Go read page 55 now.
>
> What report are you reading?

They're not reading shit. These people are animals.

speaking of animals, take it easy on your goat Ravi, it's not his fault you're always wrong

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> They're not reading shit. These people are
> animals.


Says the fucktard who already admitted that he hasn't read any of it and is waiting for the audio version. LMAO!

Stupiderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Says the fucktard who already admitted that he
> hasn't read any of it and is waiting for the audio
> version. LMAO!



this just supports my adult 12 year old theory

Stupiderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >
> > They're not reading shit. These people are
> > animals.
>
>
> Says the fucktard who already admitted that he
> hasn't read any of it and is waiting for the audio
> version. LMAO!

It's very convenient. I go to sleep at night listening to books and lectures and speeches. It's an incredible way to acquire tremendous amount of knowledge. In fact it's become so habitual I'm always looking for the next thing to listen to. And the thing will be the Mueller Report.

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Stupiderer2 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > >
> > > They're not reading shit. These people are
> > > animals.
> >
> >
> > Says the fucktard who already admitted that he
> > hasn't read any of it and is waiting for the
> audio
> > version. LMAO!
>
> It's very convenient. I go to sleep at night
> listening to books and lectures and speeches. It's
> an incredible way to acquire tremendous amount of
> knowledge. In fact it's become so habitual I'm
> always looking for the next thing to listen to.
> And the thing will be the Mueller Report.

God you are a fucking fool.

Looks like Brookings already has the Mueller Report in an hour audio up. I'll listen to it and hope it's verbatim with nothing left out because I don't usually trust rightard sources.

https://www.lawfareblog.com/lawfare-podcast-special-edition-mueller-report-under-hour

Oh they do like they're summaries. Full audio will be up somewhere soon.

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Looks like Brookings already has the Mueller
> Report in an hour audio up. I'll listen to it and
> hope it's verbatim with nothing left out because I
> don't usually trust rightard sources.
>
> https://www.lawfareblog.com/lawfare-podcast-specia
> l-edition-mueller-report-under-hour

Nigger I doubt you have a garage but if you did you should be in it with your car running and door sealed up.

If his mom had a garage it would have tuktuks in it

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Stupiderer2 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > >
> > > They're not reading shit. These people are
> > > animals.
> >
> >
> > Says the fucktard who already admitted that he
> > hasn't read any of it and is waiting for the
> audio
> > version. LMAO!
>
> It's very convenient. I go to sleep at night
> listening to books and lectures and speeches. It's
> an incredible way to acquire tremendous amount of
> knowledge. In fact it's become so habitual I'm
> always looking for the next thing to listen to.
> And the thing will be the Mueller Report.

Garbage in = Garbage out.

Also, you do not have tremendous knowledge of anything. Stop falling asleep in the first 5 minutes.

pej4d Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Stupiderer2 Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > >
> > > > They're not reading shit. These people are
> > > > animals.
> > >
> > >
> > > Says the fucktard who already admitted that
> he
> > > hasn't read any of it and is waiting for the
> > audio
> > > version. LMAO!
> >
> > It's very convenient. I go to sleep at night
> > listening to books and lectures and speeches.
> It's
> > an incredible way to acquire tremendous amount
> of
> > knowledge. In fact it's become so habitual I'm
> > always looking for the next thing to listen to.
> > And the thing will be the Mueller Report.
>
> Garbage in = Garbage out.
>
> Also, you do not have tremendous knowledge of
> anything. Stop falling asleep in the first 5
> minutes.


lulz.

That does explain a lot.

I partied with Brett Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Probable Obstruction Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > That's not obstruction, sorry. Tell your kids
> to
> > sharpen up their crayons. This could take a
> while.
>
> You don't need an outcome for obstruction,
> just intent. Mcgahn, at the time of the
> conversations, felt it was obstruction.
>
> From the report volume 2, page 37."Sessions told
> the president a special council had been
> appointed. The President slumped back in his
> chair and said,'Oh my God, This[sic] is terrible.
> This[sic] is the end of my Presidency. I am
> fucked.'"
>
>
> Stop using the word "that" as a noun. In other
> words, either use a noun to follow the word "that"
> when you write, or eliminate the word "that"
> altogether. In 95 % of the time, the sentence
> will sound better without the word "that." This
> rule also applies to the word "this." See what I
> did here?
>
> By reading your written response, your poor or
> lazy English jumps out at me, and, I wish not to
> try interpritating language of substandard written
> abilities.

FAIL AGAIN - READ THE ENTIRE EXCHANGE

Stop cherry picking Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I partied with Brett Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Probable Obstruction Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > That's not obstruction, sorry. Tell your
> kids
> > to
> > > sharpen up their crayons. This could take a
> > while.
> >
> > You don't need an outcome for obstruction,
> > just intent. Mcgahn, at the time of the
> > conversations, felt it was obstruction.
> >
> > From the report volume 2, page 37."Sessions
> told
> > the president a special council had been
> > appointed. The President slumped back in his
> > chair and said,'Oh my God, This[sic] is
> terrible.
> > This[sic] is the end of my Presidency. I am
> > fucked.'"
> >
> >
> > Stop using the word "that" as a noun. In other
> > words, either use a noun to follow the word
> "that"
> > when you write, or eliminate the word "that"
> > altogether. In 95 % of the time, the sentence
> > will sound better without the word "that."
> This
> > rule also applies to the word "this." See what
> I
> > did here?
> >
> > By reading your written response, your poor or
> > lazy English jumps out at me, and, I wish not
> to
> > try interpritating language of substandard
> written
> > abilities.
>
>
>

FAIL AGAIN - READ THE ENTIRE EXCHANGE

>
>
Thanks for highlighting the fact that Trump tried to strongarm Sessions into ‘protecting’ him. What’s wrong with this picture? Hint: The function of the AG is to represent the country, not cover up for the President. But you wouldn’t know that, of course. Another hint: When the President of the United States first reaction to hearing that a special counsel has been appointed to investigate his many crimes, and his immediate reaction is “I’m fucked.”, that’s generally not a sign of innocence.

And LEARN HOW TO RESIZE, you moron.

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Trumptard scum are so dumb lol.
Attachments:

Prepare to be boarded.

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Trumplibtard scum like me are so dumb lol.


FIFY

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Damn you'reI fucked that little boy in the Your ass hard last might. If I get caught, my ass is gonna' get fucked hard by Bubba.


FIFY

How dumb are you trump fucks. He tried to obstruct, and ordered people too, but they wouldn’t listen.

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Stupiderer2 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> >
>
> It's very convenient. I go to sleep at night
> listening to books and lectures and speechesjacking off to gay kiddie porn. It's
> an incredible way to get some cheap thrillsacquire tremendous amount of
> knowledge. In fact it's become so habitual I'm
> always looking for the Feds to come knocking on my door any day, nownext thing to listen to.
> And the thing will be the Mueller Report.


FIFY

Dumb, dumb, dumb Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> How dumb are you trump fucks. He tried to
> obstruct, and ordered people too, but they
> wouldn’t listen.


they still count in your total.

 
Attachments: