Where is Al Gore and how come we haven't heard from him lately?

He's actually dead.

He was a walking corpse the entire time. Couldn't you tell by the pallor of his skin?

You can only maintain a talking corpse for so long, and as you can see here, the rigor mortis was really starting to take over, despite the magic serum.

Give it time, another lookalike will show up as they're probably priming the body as we speak.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 02/10/2010 11:06AM by Elle Diabla.
Attachments:

The global-warming thrill ride looks to be coming to an end, undone by the same politically motivated serial exaggeration and moral preening that discredited previous apocalypses. On the heels of the East Anglia University “Climategate” scandal have come a series of embarrassing retractions from the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) regarding some of the most loudly trumpeted signs and wonders of global warming, such as the ludicrous claim that Himalayan glaciers would disappear within 30 years, that nearly half of the Amazon jungle was at imminent risk of destruction from a warming planet, and that there was a clear linkage between climate change and weather-related economic losses. The sources for these claims turned out to be environmental advocacy groups — not rigorous, peer-reviewed science.

To be sure, these revelations do not in and of themselves mean that the idea of anthropogenic global warming is false. But this is probably the beginning of a wholesale revision of the conventional wisdom on climate change. One of the central issues of Climategate — the veracity and integrity of the surface-temperature records used for our estimates of warming over the last few decades — is far from resolved. The next frontier is likely to be a fresh debate about basic climate sensitivity itself. There have been several recent peer-reviewed papers suggesting much lower climate sensitivity to greenhouse gases than the IPCC “consensus” computer models predict. And alternative explanations for observed climate change in the Arctic and elsewhere, such as shifts in ocean currents and wind patterns, should receive a second look.

Dissenters who pointed out these and other flaws in the IPCC consensus were demonized as deniers and ignored by the media, but they are now vindicated. (The American media are still averting their gaze, though the British press — even the left-wing Guardian and the Independent — is turning on the climate campaigners with deserved vengeance.) The IPCC is mumbling about non-specific reforms and changes in the process shaping its next massive climate report, due out in three or four years. The IPCC should emulate a typical feature of American government commissions and include a minority report from dissenters or scientists with a different emphasis. But the next IPCC report may not matter much: With the collapse of the Kyoto-Copenhagen process and the likely rejection of cap-and-trade in Congress, climate mania may have run its course.

Did you write this also? Or is plagiarism just a way of life for you?

February 10, 2010 4:00 A.M.
Climate Götterdämmerung
http://article.nationalreview.com/424508/climate-gtterdmmerung/the-editors

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University

The fact that world governments have not been able to agree on actions to be taken to reduce CO2 emissions doesnt mean the problem doesnt exist. In fact I am amazed that governments are sticking by the science behind global warming even as they cant agree on what to do.

Registered Voter...a Big talking coward..big man on FFXU...little man in life.

I've kidnapped Al Gore and he's shoveling my street. With a fucking spoon.

__________________________________
That's not a ladybug, that's a cannapiller.

He's hiding from a lawsuit!
http://current.com/items/91513098_youtube-al-gore-sued-by-over-30-000-scientists-for-global-warming-fraud.htm

Big Peg Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The global-warming thrill ride looks to be coming
> to an end, undone by the same politically
> motivated serial exaggeration and moral preening
> that discredited previous apocalypses. On the
> heels of the East Anglia University “Climategate”
> scandal have come a series of embarrassing
> retractions from the U.N.’s Intergovernmental
> Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) regarding some of
> the most loudly trumpeted signs and wonders of
> global warming, such as the ludicrous claim that
> Himalayan glaciers would disappear within 30
> years, that nearly half of the Amazon jungle was
> at imminent risk of destruction from a warming
> planet, and that there was a clear linkage between
> climate change and weather-related economic
> losses. The sources for these claims turned out to
> be environmental advocacy groups — not rigorous,
> peer-reviewed science.
>
> To be sure, these revelations do not in and of
> themselves mean that the idea of anthropogenic
> global warming is false. But this is probably the
> beginning of a wholesale revision of the
> conventional wisdom on climate change. One of the
> central issues of Climategate — the veracity and
> integrity of the surface-temperature records used
> for our estimates of warming over the last few
> decades — is far from resolved. The next frontier
> is likely to be a fresh debate about basic climate
> sensitivity itself. There have been several recent
> peer-reviewed papers suggesting much lower climate
> sensitivity to greenhouse gases than the IPCC
> “consensus” computer models predict. And
> alternative explanations for observed climate
> change in the Arctic and elsewhere, such as shifts
> in ocean currents and wind patterns, should
> receive a second look.
>
> Dissenters who pointed out these and other flaws
> in the IPCC consensus were demonized as deniers
> and ignored by the media, but they are now
> vindicated. (The American media are still averting
> their gaze, though the British press — even the
> left-wing Guardian and the Independent — is
> turning on the climate campaigners with deserved
> vengeance.) The IPCC is mumbling about
> non-specific reforms and changes in the process
> shaping its next massive climate report, due out
> in three or four years. The IPCC should emulate a
> typical feature of American government commissions
> and include a minority report from dissenters or
> scientists with a different emphasis. But the next
> IPCC report may not matter much: With the collapse
> of the Kyoto-Copenhagen process and the likely
> rejection of cap-and-trade in Congress, climate
> mania may have run its course.

Colleen? Is that you?

Warhawk Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I've kidnapped Al Gore and he's shoveling my
> street. With a fucking spoon.


WAIT, how did you find him!? I had him buried in my Igloo prison, wtf, oh wait, I get it, he's on work release now! Good move.

==================================================================================================
"And if any women or children get their legs torn off, or faces caved in, well, it's tough shit for them." -2LT. Bert Stiles, 505th, 339th (On Berlin Bombardier Mission, 1944).