Off-Topic :
Fairfax Underground
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Dow below 10k!
Posted by:
Price
()
Date: February 05, 2010 09:54AM
Opening this topic just for the sake of balance, since Obama lovers like to selectively post only news favorable to POTUS.
Re: Dow below 10k!
Posted by:
lQQk!! ^^^^^^^^ GayGOPer^^^
()
Date: February 05, 2010 10:00AM
gay thread by gay republicken
Re: Dow below 10k!
Posted by:
Ummm
()
Date: February 05, 2010 10:07AM
Still a lot better then the Bush administration and Republicans crashing the DOW down to 6000. WTF Republicans!
Re: Dow below 10k!
Posted by:
WashingTone-Locian
()
Date: February 05, 2010 10:14AM
It will be back up.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm
Re: Dow below 10k!
Posted by:
Eastsider
()
Date: February 05, 2010 10:32AM
Thanks for the massive deficit, Republican assholes.
Re: Dow below 10k!
Posted by:
what deficit?
()
Date: February 05, 2010 10:59AM
Eastsider Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Thanks for the massive deficit, Republican
> assholes.
Do you mean the $1.6 trillion in the President's budget?
Or, do you mean this one?
WASHINGTON (AP) — The House on Thursday voted to allow the government to go $1.9 trillion deeper in debt — an increase of about $6,000 more for every U.S. resident that provided a vivid election-year reminder of the nation's perilous financial condition.
The huge debt increase, approved 217-212, is only enough to keep the government afloat for about another year as it borrows more than 40 cents of every dollar it spends on programs like defense, health care, feeding the poor and protecting the environment. The budget tops $3.7 trillion this year and the deficit's approaching $1.6 trillion under the budget submitted by President Barack Obama this week.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Thanks for the massive deficit, Republican
> assholes.
Do you mean the $1.6 trillion in the President's budget?
Or, do you mean this one?
WASHINGTON (AP) — The House on Thursday voted to allow the government to go $1.9 trillion deeper in debt — an increase of about $6,000 more for every U.S. resident that provided a vivid election-year reminder of the nation's perilous financial condition.
The huge debt increase, approved 217-212, is only enough to keep the government afloat for about another year as it borrows more than 40 cents of every dollar it spends on programs like defense, health care, feeding the poor and protecting the environment. The budget tops $3.7 trillion this year and the deficit's approaching $1.6 trillion under the budget submitted by President Barack Obama this week.
Re: Dow below 10k!
Posted by:
WashingTone-Locian
()
Date: February 05, 2010 11:04AM
what deficit? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Eastsider Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Thanks for the massive deficit, Republican
> > assholes.
>
> Do you mean the $1.6 trillion in the President's
> budget?
>
Here is the budget breakdown. Please explain where Obama is going to cut $1 trillion?
I would like to point out that since 1980, there has been one Democrat (besides Obama) as President, and he left the country with a budget surplus. Blaming Obama for the Reagan Legacy of Massive debt is ridiculous. Where were all these teabaggers when Bush double our debt from $5 trillion to $10 trillion?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm
-------------------------------------------------------
> Eastsider Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Thanks for the massive deficit, Republican
> > assholes.
>
> Do you mean the $1.6 trillion in the President's
> budget?
>
Here is the budget breakdown. Please explain where Obama is going to cut $1 trillion?
I would like to point out that since 1980, there has been one Democrat (besides Obama) as President, and he left the country with a budget surplus. Blaming Obama for the Reagan Legacy of Massive debt is ridiculous. Where were all these teabaggers when Bush double our debt from $5 trillion to $10 trillion?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm
Re: Dow below 10k!
Posted by:
Deficit
()
Date: February 05, 2010 11:08AM
Not this Republican BS again? The truth hurts!
Attachments:
Attachments:
Re: Dow below 10k!
Posted by:
what deficit?
()
Date: February 05, 2010 11:10AM
WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> what deficit? Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Eastsider Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Thanks for the massive deficit, Republican
> > > assholes.
> >
> > Do you mean the $1.6 trillion in the
> President's
> > budget?
> >
>
> Here is the budget breakdown. Please explain where
> Obama is going to cut $1 trillion?
>
>
>
> I would like to point out that since 1980, there
> has been one Democrat (besides Obama) as
> President, and he left the country with a budget
> surplus. Blaming Obama for the Reagan Legacy of
> Massive debt is ridiculous. Where were all these
> teabaggers when Bush double our debt from $5
> trillion to $10 trillion?
Because cutting spending is the only way to balance a budget. You really are too smart to buy into the myth of the Clinton surplus. Even Democrat Fritz Hollings called out the lie in 1999.
-------------------------------------------------------
> what deficit? Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Eastsider Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Thanks for the massive deficit, Republican
> > > assholes.
> >
> > Do you mean the $1.6 trillion in the
> President's
> > budget?
> >
>
> Here is the budget breakdown. Please explain where
> Obama is going to cut $1 trillion?
>
>
>
> I would like to point out that since 1980, there
> has been one Democrat (besides Obama) as
> President, and he left the country with a budget
> surplus. Blaming Obama for the Reagan Legacy of
> Massive debt is ridiculous. Where were all these
> teabaggers when Bush double our debt from $5
> trillion to $10 trillion?
Because cutting spending is the only way to balance a budget. You really are too smart to buy into the myth of the Clinton surplus. Even Democrat Fritz Hollings called out the lie in 1999.
Re: Dow below 10k!
Posted by:
Deficit
()
Date: February 05, 2010 11:12AM
Q - You know what doesn't hurt?
A - A cock in my ass. As a Democrat I have become used to it and I love it!
A - A cock in my ass. As a Democrat I have become used to it and I love it!
Re: Dow below 10k!
Posted by:
Pouter
()
Date: February 05, 2010 11:13AM
When are Republicans going to come back to reality?
Re: Dow below 10k!
Posted by:
WashingTone-Locian
()
Date: February 05, 2010 11:15AM
what deficit? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> Because cutting spending is the only way to
> balance a budget.
The way Bush did when he created the largest Medicare benefit since LBJ? Or his military spending???
You can't cut the interest on our debt. The only way to save $1 trillion would be to slash Medicare and Defense by at least 50%. Are the Republicans in Congress going to vote for that? Because that's what it would take. And there would be huge implications for the economy if we did that. We most certainly would be in a Depression after that.
>You really are too smart to buy
> into the myth of the Clinton surplus. Even
> Democrat Fritz Hollings called out the lie in
> 1999.
Bullshit. Point to a stat produced by something other than a Republican Think Tank to back up your claim.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 02/05/2010 11:15AM by WashingTone-Locian.
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> Because cutting spending is the only way to
> balance a budget.
The way Bush did when he created the largest Medicare benefit since LBJ? Or his military spending???
You can't cut the interest on our debt. The only way to save $1 trillion would be to slash Medicare and Defense by at least 50%. Are the Republicans in Congress going to vote for that? Because that's what it would take. And there would be huge implications for the economy if we did that. We most certainly would be in a Depression after that.
>You really are too smart to buy
> into the myth of the Clinton surplus. Even
> Democrat Fritz Hollings called out the lie in
> 1999.
Bullshit. Point to a stat produced by something other than a Republican Think Tank to back up your claim.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 02/05/2010 11:15AM by WashingTone-Locian.
Re: Dow below 10k!
Posted by:
Outer
()
Date: February 05, 2010 11:16AM
Deficit Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Q - You know what doesn't hurt?
>
> A - A cock in my ass. As a Democrat I have become
> used to it and I love it!
Troll alert
-------------------------------------------------------
> Q - You know what doesn't hurt?
>
> A - A cock in my ass. As a Democrat I have become
> used to it and I love it!
Troll alert
Re: Dow below 10k!
Posted by:
what deficit?
()
Date: February 05, 2010 11:22AM
WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The way Bush did when he created the largest
> Medicare benefit since LBJ? Or his military
> spending???
>
> You can't cut the interest on our debt. The only
> way to save $1 trillion would be to slash Medicare
> and Defense by at least 50%. Are the Republicans
> in Congress going to vote for that? Because that's
> what it would take. And there would be huge
> implications for the economy if we did that. We
> most certainly would be in a Depression after
> that.
Again, cuts are not the only way to balance a budget. It's a simple concept that even you can understand.
> Bullshit. Point to a stat produced by something
> other than a Republican Think Tank to back up your
> claim.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/budget/stories/op020598.htm
-------------------------------------------------------
> The way Bush did when he created the largest
> Medicare benefit since LBJ? Or his military
> spending???
>
> You can't cut the interest on our debt. The only
> way to save $1 trillion would be to slash Medicare
> and Defense by at least 50%. Are the Republicans
> in Congress going to vote for that? Because that's
> what it would take. And there would be huge
> implications for the economy if we did that. We
> most certainly would be in a Depression after
> that.
Again, cuts are not the only way to balance a budget. It's a simple concept that even you can understand.
> Bullshit. Point to a stat produced by something
> other than a Republican Think Tank to back up your
> claim.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/budget/stories/op020598.htm
Re: Dow below 10k!
Posted by:
WashingTone-Locian
()
Date: February 05, 2010 11:30AM
what deficit? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> Again, cuts are not the only way to balance a
> budget. It's a simple concept that even you can
> understand.
>
Raise taxes and cut spending. Are Republicans in Congress ready to do that? No. They haven't been.
>
> > Bullshit. Point to a stat produced by something
> > other than a Republican Think Tank to back up
> your
> > claim.
>
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/spec
> ial/budget/stories/op020598.htm
That was a Hollings' commentary from 1998. He was proven wrong by reality.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> Again, cuts are not the only way to balance a
> budget. It's a simple concept that even you can
> understand.
>
Raise taxes and cut spending. Are Republicans in Congress ready to do that? No. They haven't been.
>
> > Bullshit. Point to a stat produced by something
> > other than a Republican Think Tank to back up
> your
> > claim.
>
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/spec
> ial/budget/stories/op020598.htm
That was a Hollings' commentary from 1998. He was proven wrong by reality.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm
Re: Dow below 10k!
Posted by:
what deficit?
()
Date: February 05, 2010 11:30AM
it's also a simple concept that my ghey republican party couldnt figure out!!!!!
yukyukyuk yuk yuk yuk
yukyukyuk yuk yuk yuk
Re: Dow below 10k!
Posted by:
what deficit?
()
Date: February 05, 2010 11:32AM
i just wish we were in power again so we can experience the good times of the 2000s....i struggle to win this argument
Re: Dow below 10k!
Posted by:
what deficit?
()
Date: February 05, 2010 11:40AM
WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Raise taxes and cut spending. Are Republicans in
> Congress ready to do that? No. They haven't been.
I don't give a fuck what the Republican are prepared to do. They aren't in power. The Democrats need to lead.
> That was a Hollings' commentary from 1998. He was
> proven wrong by reality.
Actually, he has been proven right. Only a diehard partisan with an agenda would cling to the surplus myth. If there was such a surplus, why was Al Gore clamoring for a "lock box" on social security? He knew Hollings was right.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Raise taxes and cut spending. Are Republicans in
> Congress ready to do that? No. They haven't been.
I don't give a fuck what the Republican are prepared to do. They aren't in power. The Democrats need to lead.
> That was a Hollings' commentary from 1998. He was
> proven wrong by reality.
Actually, he has been proven right. Only a diehard partisan with an agenda would cling to the surplus myth. If there was such a surplus, why was Al Gore clamoring for a "lock box" on social security? He knew Hollings was right.
Re: Dow below 10k!
Posted by:
Registered Voter
()
Date: February 05, 2010 12:08PM
what deficit? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > Raise taxes and cut spending. Are Republicans
> in
> > Congress ready to do that? No. They haven't
> been.
>
> I don't give a fuck what the Republican are
> prepared to do. They aren't in power. The
> Democrats need to lead.
>
> > That was a Hollings' commentary from 1998. He
> was
> > proven wrong by reality.
>
> Actually, he has been proven right. Only a diehard
> partisan with an agenda would cling to the surplus
> myth. If there was such a surplus, why was Al
> Gore clamoring for a "lock box" on social
> security? He knew Hollings was right.
Unfortunately with Obama sliding down the ratings pole, WTL has become more partisan. Not sure what that is about other then him trying to defend the piss poor showing so far by ignoring reality. Hollings was proven correct - they said that this year they actually are seeing Soc Sec pay out more than it takes in. And the so called surplus that SS "has" is nothing more then IOUs pushed by the Treasury on "interest" the money would have earned if it had not already been spent. Supposedly it will break even again for a couple of more years after this, but then it is all downhill - pretty amazing when you think about it - all these years we have been content to sit back and watch these idiots "balance" the budget by spending money for SS. And yet the Federal government is the first one to criticize airlines and such for underfunding their retirement liabilities.
If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University
-------------------------------------------------------
> WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > Raise taxes and cut spending. Are Republicans
> in
> > Congress ready to do that? No. They haven't
> been.
>
> I don't give a fuck what the Republican are
> prepared to do. They aren't in power. The
> Democrats need to lead.
>
> > That was a Hollings' commentary from 1998. He
> was
> > proven wrong by reality.
>
> Actually, he has been proven right. Only a diehard
> partisan with an agenda would cling to the surplus
> myth. If there was such a surplus, why was Al
> Gore clamoring for a "lock box" on social
> security? He knew Hollings was right.
Unfortunately with Obama sliding down the ratings pole, WTL has become more partisan. Not sure what that is about other then him trying to defend the piss poor showing so far by ignoring reality. Hollings was proven correct - they said that this year they actually are seeing Soc Sec pay out more than it takes in. And the so called surplus that SS "has" is nothing more then IOUs pushed by the Treasury on "interest" the money would have earned if it had not already been spent. Supposedly it will break even again for a couple of more years after this, but then it is all downhill - pretty amazing when you think about it - all these years we have been content to sit back and watch these idiots "balance" the budget by spending money for SS. And yet the Federal government is the first one to criticize airlines and such for underfunding their retirement liabilities.
If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University
Re: Dow below 10k!
Posted by:
WashingTone-Locian
()
Date: February 05, 2010 12:56PM
what deficit? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > Raise taxes and cut spending. Are Republicans
> in
> > Congress ready to do that? No. They haven't
> been.
>
> I don't give a fuck what the Republican are
> prepared to do. They aren't in power. The
> Democrats need to lead.
>
Compared to what? To Republicans doubling the deficit on their watch?
> > That was a Hollings' commentary from 1998. He
> was
> > proven wrong by reality.
>
> Actually, he has been proven right. Only a diehard
> partisan with an agenda would cling to the surplus
> myth. If there was such a surplus, why was Al
> Gore clamoring for a "lock box" on social
> security? He knew Hollings was right.
From the Congressional Budget Office. Look at years 1999, 2000 and 2001 for (Debt Held By Public). It goes down, dummy...
www.cbo.gov/budget/data/historical.pdf
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm
-------------------------------------------------------
> WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > Raise taxes and cut spending. Are Republicans
> in
> > Congress ready to do that? No. They haven't
> been.
>
> I don't give a fuck what the Republican are
> prepared to do. They aren't in power. The
> Democrats need to lead.
>
Compared to what? To Republicans doubling the deficit on their watch?
> > That was a Hollings' commentary from 1998. He
> was
> > proven wrong by reality.
>
> Actually, he has been proven right. Only a diehard
> partisan with an agenda would cling to the surplus
> myth. If there was such a surplus, why was Al
> Gore clamoring for a "lock box" on social
> security? He knew Hollings was right.
From the Congressional Budget Office. Look at years 1999, 2000 and 2001 for (Debt Held By Public). It goes down, dummy...
www.cbo.gov/budget/data/historical.pdf
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm
Re: Dow below 10k!
Posted by:
WashingTone-Locian
()
Date: February 05, 2010 12:57PM
Registered Voter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> Unfortunately with Obama sliding down the ratings
> pole, WTL has become more partisan.
Here comes Vince(r) again. Sorry to see you didn't learn your lesson, Republican Vince.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> Unfortunately with Obama sliding down the ratings
> pole, WTL has become more partisan.
Here comes Vince(r) again. Sorry to see you didn't learn your lesson, Republican Vince.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm
Re: Dow below 10k!
Posted by:
Registered Voter
()
Date: February 05, 2010 01:05PM
WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Registered Voter Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> >
> > Unfortunately with Obama sliding down the
> ratings
> > pole, WTL has become more partisan.
>
>
> Here comes Vince(r) again. Sorry to see you didn't
> learn your lesson, Republican Vince.
Yes, I call you partisan and you call me Vince. OOh hurt me lol.
Vince is a fucking idiot, you are becoming one. If that is the best you can do - calling me Vince - have at it. I laugh every time you think you are "getting me" with it. You don't want to admit you are having issues lately, not much more can be done other to keep laughing at your partisan posturing.
Others always noted I had a partisan bent, so nothing new there. I just don't come around telling you all to sniff each others nut sacks or lick assholes like other fuckwits here seem to get off on. But hey, you want to be hangin with the 15yr old crowd, feel free.
If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University
-------------------------------------------------------
> Registered Voter Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> >
> > Unfortunately with Obama sliding down the
> ratings
> > pole, WTL has become more partisan.
>
>
> Here comes Vince(r) again. Sorry to see you didn't
> learn your lesson, Republican Vince.
Yes, I call you partisan and you call me Vince. OOh hurt me lol.
Vince is a fucking idiot, you are becoming one. If that is the best you can do - calling me Vince - have at it. I laugh every time you think you are "getting me" with it. You don't want to admit you are having issues lately, not much more can be done other to keep laughing at your partisan posturing.
Others always noted I had a partisan bent, so nothing new there. I just don't come around telling you all to sniff each others nut sacks or lick assholes like other fuckwits here seem to get off on. But hey, you want to be hangin with the 15yr old crowd, feel free.
If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University
Re: Dow below 10k!
Posted by:
WashingTone-Locian
()
Date: February 05, 2010 01:24PM
Registered Voter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> Vince is a fucking idiot, you are becoming one. If
> that is the best you can do - calling me Vince -
> have at it. I laugh every time you think you are
> "getting me" with it.
If you read the PMs I get from everyone when I do this, you would know what I am talking about.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> Vince is a fucking idiot, you are becoming one. If
> that is the best you can do - calling me Vince -
> have at it. I laugh every time you think you are
> "getting me" with it.
If you read the PMs I get from everyone when I do this, you would know what I am talking about.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm
Re: Dow below 10k!
Posted by:
fairfaxdude
()
Date: February 05, 2010 01:28PM
WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If you read the PMs I get from everyone when I do
> this, you would know what I am talking about.
HAHHAHA. I bet your PM box is stuffed full.
______________________________________________
I have had to change the addresses to my retaliatory blogs over half a dozen times.
-------------------------------------------------------
> If you read the PMs I get from everyone when I do
> this, you would know what I am talking about.
HAHHAHA. I bet your PM box is stuffed full.
______________________________________________
I have had to change the addresses to my retaliatory blogs over half a dozen times.
Re: Dow below 10k!
Posted by:
WashingTone-Locian
()
Date: February 05, 2010 01:30PM
fairfaxdude Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > If you read the PMs I get from everyone when I
> do
> > this, you would know what I am talking about.
>
>
> HAHHAHA. I bet your PM box is stuffed full.
; )
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm
-------------------------------------------------------
> WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > If you read the PMs I get from everyone when I
> do
> > this, you would know what I am talking about.
>
>
> HAHHAHA. I bet your PM box is stuffed full.
; )
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm
Re: Dow below 10k!
Posted by:
Registered Voter
()
Date: February 05, 2010 01:33PM
WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Registered Voter Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> >
> > Vince is a fucking idiot, you are becoming one.
> If
> > that is the best you can do - calling me Vince
> -
> > have at it. I laugh every time you think you
> are
> > "getting me" with it.
>
> If you read the PMs I get from everyone when I do
> this, you would know what I am talking about.
Great, so they PM you. Obviously they believe you are "getting me". Good for them.
I also have PMs from the unnamed one I have never read, just deleted. He evidently felt you were doing so well it emboldened him to PM me. Joy :) We all have our reasons to post here and elsewhere - I know some folks that like what I post, and some that don't. Oh well. Comes with the territory.
If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University
-------------------------------------------------------
> Registered Voter Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> >
> > Vince is a fucking idiot, you are becoming one.
> If
> > that is the best you can do - calling me Vince
> -
> > have at it. I laugh every time you think you
> are
> > "getting me" with it.
>
> If you read the PMs I get from everyone when I do
> this, you would know what I am talking about.
Great, so they PM you. Obviously they believe you are "getting me". Good for them.
I also have PMs from the unnamed one I have never read, just deleted. He evidently felt you were doing so well it emboldened him to PM me. Joy :) We all have our reasons to post here and elsewhere - I know some folks that like what I post, and some that don't. Oh well. Comes with the territory.
If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University
Re: Dow below 10k!
Posted by:
Registered Voter
()
Date: February 05, 2010 01:35PM
fairfaxdude Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > If you read the PMs I get from everyone when I
> do
> > this, you would know what I am talking about.
>
>
> HAHHAHA. I bet your PM box is stuffed full.
I have to laugh at this. FF "coming out" to play today - just makes me all warm inside knowing that I can get a rise out of him to come out and make with his usual stupid commentary. Go FF, Go!
(for all you gaytards out there)
If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University
-------------------------------------------------------
> WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > If you read the PMs I get from everyone when I
> do
> > this, you would know what I am talking about.
>
>
> HAHHAHA. I bet your PM box is stuffed full.
I have to laugh at this. FF "coming out" to play today - just makes me all warm inside knowing that I can get a rise out of him to come out and make with his usual stupid commentary. Go FF, Go!
(for all you gaytards out there)
If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University
Re: Dow below 10k!
Posted by:
RepublicanLeadershit
()
Date: February 05, 2010 01:58PM
How are the Republicans talking about the current debt load when they were the one who created it in the first place? Your cries are falling on deaf ears, little bitch.
Another idiotic post by Registered Voter, I mean Retarded Voter, I mean Republican Vince, I mean Republican Vagina.
Another idiotic post by Registered Voter, I mean Retarded Voter, I mean Republican Vince, I mean Republican Vagina.
Re: Dow below 10k!
Posted by:
Registered Voter
()
Date: February 05, 2010 02:00PM
Right. Bush from $5T to $10T - Obama will take us to at least $20T (especially if he goes two terms - then it will be closer to $25T). That's some leadership for you. Keep trying Fairy.
Best you keep blaming Bush - that way you can keep your head in the sand for a while longer.
If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 02/05/2010 02:01PM by Registered Voter.
Best you keep blaming Bush - that way you can keep your head in the sand for a while longer.
If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 02/05/2010 02:01PM by Registered Voter.
Re: Dow below 10k!
Posted by:
Price
()
Date: February 05, 2010 02:07PM
Below 9900 now. Obviously Reps are the ones to blame...
Re: Dow below 10k!
Posted by:
RV&Price'sChooChoo
()
Date: February 05, 2010 02:12PM
Hard to stop a runaway train when the conductor jumped the tracks.
Let's talk about the budget now. What did Bush do to it again? And Obama?
Let's talk about the budget now. What did Bush do to it again? And Obama?
Re: Dow below 10k!
Posted by:
Price
()
Date: February 05, 2010 02:19PM
And since the name Clinton was brought up, let's talk about the dot-com bubble and its aftermath too.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 02/05/2010 02:29PM by Price.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 02/05/2010 02:29PM by Price.
Re: Dow below 10k!
Posted by:
PriceLikesMichaelBuble?
()
Date: February 05, 2010 02:25PM
Buble?
Your credibility is shot to hell, so you should consider lowering your Price.
Your credibility is shot to hell, so you should consider lowering your Price.
Re: Dow below 10k!
Posted by:
LOLer
()
Date: February 05, 2010 04:00PM
fairfaxdude Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > If you read the PMs I get from everyone when I
> do
> > this, you would know what I am talking about.
>
>
> HAHHAHA. I bet your PM box is stuffed full.
Fairy has his ass box stuffed full. LOL
-------------------------------------------------------
> WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > If you read the PMs I get from everyone when I
> do
> > this, you would know what I am talking about.
>
>
> HAHHAHA. I bet your PM box is stuffed full.
Fairy has his ass box stuffed full. LOL
Re: Dow below 10k!
Posted by:
LOLcat
()
Date: February 05, 2010 04:05PM
blame wall street, not a POTUS!
Re: Dow below 10k!
Posted by:
what deficit?
()
Date: February 05, 2010 04:06PM
WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> From the Congressional Budget Office. Look at
> years 1999, 2000 and 2001 for (Debt Held By
> Public). It goes down, dummy...
>
> www.cbo.gov/budget/data/historical.pdf
Why don't you look at the "total public outsanding debt" for those years?
http://www.treasurydirect.gov/NP/BPDLogin?application=np
While I don;t give much credence to your intelligence, I am sure EVEN you can figure out how to use the application.
-------------------------------------------------------
> From the Congressional Budget Office. Look at
> years 1999, 2000 and 2001 for (Debt Held By
> Public). It goes down, dummy...
>
> www.cbo.gov/budget/data/historical.pdf
Why don't you look at the "total public outsanding debt" for those years?
http://www.treasurydirect.gov/NP/BPDLogin?application=np
While I don;t give much credence to your intelligence, I am sure EVEN you can figure out how to use the application.
Re: Dow below 10k!
Posted by:
LOLer
()
Date: February 05, 2010 04:08PM
WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> fairfaxdude Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> >
> > > If you read the PMs I get from everyone when
> I
> > do
> > > this, you would know what I am talking about.
> >
> >
> > HAHHAHA. I bet your PM box is stuffed full.
>
>
> ; )
LOL, he is winking at Fairy. Big surprise there. The closet is full of their type,
-------------------------------------------------------
> fairfaxdude Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> >
> > > If you read the PMs I get from everyone when
> I
> > do
> > > this, you would know what I am talking about.
> >
> >
> > HAHHAHA. I bet your PM box is stuffed full.
>
>
> ; )
LOL, he is winking at Fairy. Big surprise there. The closet is full of their type,