Off-Topic :
Fairfax Underground
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Jared and Ivanka Kushner pulled in 82 million dollars in outside income from their business enterprises around the world.
Posted by:
itchey
()
Date: June 12, 2018 07:44PM
imagine if Barry had hired his relatives to profit from public service on this scale. I imagine Mitch and Paul would not even mention it.
Re: Jared and Ivanka Kushner pulled in 82 million dollars in outside income from their business enterprises around the world.
Posted by:
dpcwk
()
Date: June 12, 2018 07:57PM
You do know that this stat is meaningless without previous year's incomes. For all you know this represents a year to year loss.
Re: Jared and Ivanka Kushner pulled in 82 million dollars in outside income from their business enterprises around the world.
Posted by:
oh my god
()
Date: June 12, 2018 10:22PM
dpcwk Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You do know that this stat is meaningless without
> previous year's incomes. For all you know this
> represents a year to year loss.
You cannot be serious.
-------------------------------------------------------
> You do know that this stat is meaningless without
> previous year's incomes. For all you know this
> represents a year to year loss.
You cannot be serious.
Re: Jared and Ivanka Kushner pulled in 82 million dollars in outside income from their business enterprises around the world.
Posted by:
Obama Was Black
()
Date: June 12, 2018 10:33PM
itchey Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> imagine if Barry had hired his relatives to profit
> from public service on this scale. I imagine
> Mitch and Paul would not even mention it.
Therefore none of his realities that weren’t in prison were not qualified.
-------------------------------------------------------
> imagine if Barry had hired his relatives to profit
> from public service on this scale. I imagine
> Mitch and Paul would not even mention it.
Therefore none of his realities that weren’t in prison were not qualified.
Re: Jared and Ivanka Kushner pulled in 82 million dollars in outside income from their business enterprises around the world.
Posted by:
Hillbilly LLC
()
Date: June 12, 2018 10:42PM
You didn't have any problem with the Clintons pulling in near $30 million. With no businesses. Other than accepting graft payments anyway.
Re: Jared and Ivanka Kushner pulled in 82 million dollars in outside income from their business enterprises around the world.
Posted by:
dpcwk
()
Date: June 13, 2018 06:50AM
oh my god Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> dpcwk Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > You do know that this stat is meaningless
> without
> > previous year's incomes. For all you know this
> > represents a year to year loss.
>
> You cannot be serious.
Yes, perfectly serious. A single data point means nothing. Further, this isn't an accurate representation of their net income. It doesn't account for losses. And lastly, so what? Income is proof of corruption?
Jared has a business outside of just being Jared. Exactly what business does Obama? Being Obama? That's more irritating than anything else. The cult of personality.
-------------------------------------------------------
> dpcwk Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > You do know that this stat is meaningless
> without
> > previous year's incomes. For all you know this
> > represents a year to year loss.
>
> You cannot be serious.
Yes, perfectly serious. A single data point means nothing. Further, this isn't an accurate representation of their net income. It doesn't account for losses. And lastly, so what? Income is proof of corruption?
Jared has a business outside of just being Jared. Exactly what business does Obama? Being Obama? That's more irritating than anything else. The cult of personality.
Re: Jared and Ivanka Kushner pulled in 82 million dollars in outside income from their business enterprises around the world.
Posted by:
President Trump FTW!
()
Date: June 13, 2018 07:44AM
oh my god Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> dpcwk Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > You do know that this stat is meaningless
> without
> > previous year's incomes. For all you know this
> > represents a year to year loss.
>
> You cannot be serious.
Oh shit, you confronted a lib to back up their statement with fact.
Attachments:
-------------------------------------------------------
> dpcwk Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > You do know that this stat is meaningless
> without
> > previous year's incomes. For all you know this
> > represents a year to year loss.
>
> You cannot be serious.
Oh shit, you confronted a lib to back up their statement with fact.
Attachments:
Re: Jared and Ivanka Kushner pulled in 82 million dollars in outside income from their business enterprises around the world.
Posted by:
sureokkk
()
Date: June 13, 2018 10:06AM
Hillbilly LLC Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You didn't have any problem with the Clintons
> pulling in near $30 million. With no businesses.
> Other than accepting graft payments anyway.
Neither was in office while earning the 30 million. you forgot to mention that - must have skipped your mind huh? Also Ill provide a source unlike you you donkey.
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/16/us/politics/clintons-reportedly-earned-30-million-in-the-last-16-months.html
Finally, we know all of this because the Clintons have disclosed ALL their income and dozens of tax returns. Trump and his royal family hide a large portion of their assets, income and almost all their income tax filings.
-------------------------------------------------------
> You didn't have any problem with the Clintons
> pulling in near $30 million. With no businesses.
> Other than accepting graft payments anyway.
Neither was in office while earning the 30 million. you forgot to mention that - must have skipped your mind huh? Also Ill provide a source unlike you you donkey.
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/16/us/politics/clintons-reportedly-earned-30-million-in-the-last-16-months.html
Finally, we know all of this because the Clintons have disclosed ALL their income and dozens of tax returns. Trump and his royal family hide a large portion of their assets, income and almost all their income tax filings.
Re: Jared and Ivanka Kushner pulled in 82 million dollars in outside income from their business enterprises around the world.
Posted by:
dpcwk
()
Date: June 13, 2018 11:02AM
sureokkk Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hillbilly LLC Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > You didn't have any problem with the Clintons
> > pulling in near $30 million. With no
> businesses.
> > Other than accepting graft payments anyway.
>
> Neither was in office while earning the 30
> million. you forgot to mention that - must have
> skipped your mind huh? Also Ill provide a source
> unlike you you donkey.
>
> https://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/16/us/politics/cli
> ntons-reportedly-earned-30-million-in-the-last-16-
> months.html
>
> Finally, we know all of this because the Clintons
> have disclosed ALL their income and dozens of tax
> returns. Trump and his royal family hide a large
> portion of their assets, income and almost all
> their income tax filings.
Which still isn't evidence of anything.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hillbilly LLC Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > You didn't have any problem with the Clintons
> > pulling in near $30 million. With no
> businesses.
> > Other than accepting graft payments anyway.
>
> Neither was in office while earning the 30
> million. you forgot to mention that - must have
> skipped your mind huh? Also Ill provide a source
> unlike you you donkey.
>
> https://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/16/us/politics/cli
> ntons-reportedly-earned-30-million-in-the-last-16-
> months.html
>
> Finally, we know all of this because the Clintons
> have disclosed ALL their income and dozens of tax
> returns. Trump and his royal family hide a large
> portion of their assets, income and almost all
> their income tax filings.
Which still isn't evidence of anything.
Re: Jared and Ivanka Kushner pulled in 82 million dollars in outside income from their business enterprises around the world.
Posted by:
analysis
()
Date: June 13, 2018 11:06AM
President Trump FTW! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> oh my god Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > dpcwk Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > You do know that this stat is meaningless
> > without
> > > previous year's incomes. For all you know
> this
> > > represents a year to year loss.
> >
> > You cannot be serious.
>
> Oh shit, you confronted a lib to back up their
> statement with fact.
Actually the lib presented a fact and the trumptard proposed a 'what if' its a loss backed up by nothing.
So what if your mom was a whore and you are the bastard child of a negro convict? This is the reason logic is difficult for you to follow. Sorry.
-------------------------------------------------------
> oh my god Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > dpcwk Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > You do know that this stat is meaningless
> > without
> > > previous year's incomes. For all you know
> this
> > > represents a year to year loss.
> >
> > You cannot be serious.
>
> Oh shit, you confronted a lib to back up their
> statement with fact.
Actually the lib presented a fact and the trumptard proposed a 'what if' its a loss backed up by nothing.
So what if your mom was a whore and you are the bastard child of a negro convict? This is the reason logic is difficult for you to follow. Sorry.
Re: Jared and Ivanka Kushner pulled in 82 million dollars in outside income from their business enterprises around the world.
Posted by:
3uydy
()
Date: June 13, 2018 11:19AM
analysis Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> President Trump FTW! Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > oh my god Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > dpcwk Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > You do know that this stat is meaningless
> > > without
> > > > previous year's incomes. For all you know
> > this
> > > > represents a year to year loss.
> > >
> > > You cannot be serious.
> >
> > Oh shit, you confronted a lib to back up their
> > statement with fact.
>
> Actually the lib presented a fact and the
> trumptard proposed a 'what if' its a loss backed
> up by nothing.
>
> So what if your mom was a whore and you are the
> bastard child of a negro convict? This is the
> reason logic is difficult for you to follow.
> Sorry.
You have a problem with reading comprehension. The OP changed income in the subject to profit in the body of the message. It's subtle word play to sway the poorly educated.
-------------------------------------------------------
> President Trump FTW! Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > oh my god Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > dpcwk Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > You do know that this stat is meaningless
> > > without
> > > > previous year's incomes. For all you know
> > this
> > > > represents a year to year loss.
> > >
> > > You cannot be serious.
> >
> > Oh shit, you confronted a lib to back up their
> > statement with fact.
>
> Actually the lib presented a fact and the
> trumptard proposed a 'what if' its a loss backed
> up by nothing.
>
> So what if your mom was a whore and you are the
> bastard child of a negro convict? This is the
> reason logic is difficult for you to follow.
> Sorry.
You have a problem with reading comprehension. The OP changed income in the subject to profit in the body of the message. It's subtle word play to sway the poorly educated.
Re: Jared and Ivanka Kushner pulled in 82 million dollars in outside income from their business enterprises around the world.
Posted by:
You are busted bro
()
Date: June 13, 2018 11:28AM
3uydy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> analysis Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > President Trump FTW! Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > oh my god Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > dpcwk Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > You do know that this stat is meaningless
> > > > without
> > > > > previous year's incomes. For all you
> know
> > > this
> > > > > represents a year to year loss.
> > > >
> > > > You cannot be serious.
> > >
> > > Oh shit, you confronted a lib to back up
> their
> > > statement with fact.
> >
> > Actually the lib presented a fact and the
> > trumptard proposed a 'what if' its a loss
> backed
> > up by nothing.
> >
> > So what if your mom was a whore and you are the
> > bastard child of a negro convict? This is the
> > reason logic is difficult for you to follow.
> > Sorry.
>
> You have a problem with reading comprehension.
> The OP changed income in the subject to profit in
> the body of the message. It's subtle word play to
> sway the poorly educated.
you make me laugh. You are busted and the best you can come up with is that? Word profit was used in a hypothetical. The fact of income by Trumps remains. Its ok we know you like the pay for play set-up the Trumps have now. Its super MAGA
lol, donkey.
-------------------------------------------------------
> analysis Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > President Trump FTW! Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > oh my god Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > dpcwk Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > You do know that this stat is meaningless
> > > > without
> > > > > previous year's incomes. For all you
> know
> > > this
> > > > > represents a year to year loss.
> > > >
> > > > You cannot be serious.
> > >
> > > Oh shit, you confronted a lib to back up
> their
> > > statement with fact.
> >
> > Actually the lib presented a fact and the
> > trumptard proposed a 'what if' its a loss
> backed
> > up by nothing.
> >
> > So what if your mom was a whore and you are the
> > bastard child of a negro convict? This is the
> > reason logic is difficult for you to follow.
> > Sorry.
>
> You have a problem with reading comprehension.
> The OP changed income in the subject to profit in
> the body of the message. It's subtle word play to
> sway the poorly educated.
you make me laugh. You are busted and the best you can come up with is that? Word profit was used in a hypothetical. The fact of income by Trumps remains. Its ok we know you like the pay for play set-up the Trumps have now. Its super MAGA
lol, donkey.
Re: Jared and Ivanka Kushner pulled in 82 million dollars in outside income from their business enterprises around the world.
Posted by:
dpcwk
()
Date: June 13, 2018 12:29PM
You are busted bro Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> 3uydy Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > analysis Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > President Trump FTW! Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > oh my god Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > dpcwk Wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----
> > > > > > You do know that this stat is
> meaningless
> > > > > without
> > > > > > previous year's incomes. For all you
> > know
> > > > this
> > > > > > represents a year to year loss.
> > > > >
> > > > > You cannot be serious.
> > > >
> > > > Oh shit, you confronted a lib to back up
> > their
> > > > statement with fact.
> > >
> > > Actually the lib presented a fact and the
> > > trumptard proposed a 'what if' its a loss
> > backed
> > > up by nothing.
> > >
> > > So what if your mom was a whore and you are
> the
> > > bastard child of a negro convict? This is
> the
> > > reason logic is difficult for you to follow.
> > > Sorry.
> >
> > You have a problem with reading comprehension.
> > The OP changed income in the subject to profit
> in
> > the body of the message. It's subtle word play
> to
> > sway the poorly educated.
>
> you make me laugh. You are busted and the best
> you can come up with is that? Word profit was
> used in a hypothetical. The fact of income by
> Trumps remains. Its ok we know you like the pay
> for play set-up the Trumps have now. Its super
> MAGA
>
> lol, donkey.
You have proven my point. Go back to grade school.
-------------------------------------------------------
> 3uydy Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > analysis Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > President Trump FTW! Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > oh my god Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > dpcwk Wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----
> > > > > > You do know that this stat is
> meaningless
> > > > > without
> > > > > > previous year's incomes. For all you
> > know
> > > > this
> > > > > > represents a year to year loss.
> > > > >
> > > > > You cannot be serious.
> > > >
> > > > Oh shit, you confronted a lib to back up
> > their
> > > > statement with fact.
> > >
> > > Actually the lib presented a fact and the
> > > trumptard proposed a 'what if' its a loss
> > backed
> > > up by nothing.
> > >
> > > So what if your mom was a whore and you are
> the
> > > bastard child of a negro convict? This is
> the
> > > reason logic is difficult for you to follow.
> > > Sorry.
> >
> > You have a problem with reading comprehension.
> > The OP changed income in the subject to profit
> in
> > the body of the message. It's subtle word play
> to
> > sway the poorly educated.
>
> you make me laugh. You are busted and the best
> you can come up with is that? Word profit was
> used in a hypothetical. The fact of income by
> Trumps remains. Its ok we know you like the pay
> for play set-up the Trumps have now. Its super
> MAGA
>
> lol, donkey.
You have proven my point. Go back to grade school.
Re: Jared and Ivanka Kushner pulled in 82 million dollars in outside income from their business enterprises around the world.
Posted by:
Richer than you'll ever be bitch
()
Date: June 13, 2018 01:07PM
itchey Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> imagine if Barry had hired his relatives to profit
> from public service on this scale. I imagine
> Mitch and Paul would not even mention it.
Jelly?
-------------------------------------------------------
> imagine if Barry had hired his relatives to profit
> from public service on this scale. I imagine
> Mitch and Paul would not even mention it.
Jelly?
Re: Jared and Ivanka Kushner pulled in 82 million dollars in outside income from their business enterprises around the world.
Posted by:
for profit
()
Date: June 13, 2018 01:25PM
dpcwk Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You are busted bro Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > 3uydy Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > analysis Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > President Trump FTW! Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > oh my god Wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----
> > > > > > dpcwk Wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----
> > > > > > > You do know that this stat is
> > meaningless
> > > > > > without
> > > > > > > previous year's incomes. For all you
> > > know
> > > > > this
> > > > > > > represents a year to year loss.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You cannot be serious.
> > > > >
> > > > > Oh shit, you confronted a lib to back up
> > > their
> > > > > statement with fact.
> > > >
> > > > Actually the lib presented a fact and the
> > > > trumptard proposed a 'what if' its a loss
> > > backed
> > > > up by nothing.
> > > >
> > > > So what if your mom was a whore and you are
> > the
> > > > bastard child of a negro convict? This is
> > the
> > > > reason logic is difficult for you to follow.
>
> > > > Sorry.
> > >
> > > You have a problem with reading comprehension.
>
> > > The OP changed income in the subject to
> profit
> > in
> > > the body of the message. It's subtle word
> play
> > to
> > > sway the poorly educated.
> >
> > you make me laugh. You are busted and the best
> > you can come up with is that? Word profit was
> > used in a hypothetical. The fact of income by
> > Trumps remains. Its ok we know you like the
> pay
> > for play set-up the Trumps have now. Its super
> > MAGA
> >
> > lol, donkey.
>
> You have proven my point. Go back to grade
> school.
You lost the argument why not go for a walk before it rains - you will feel better.
-------------------------------------------------------
> You are busted bro Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > 3uydy Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > analysis Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > President Trump FTW! Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > oh my god Wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----
> > > > > > dpcwk Wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----
> > > > > > > You do know that this stat is
> > meaningless
> > > > > > without
> > > > > > > previous year's incomes. For all you
> > > know
> > > > > this
> > > > > > > represents a year to year loss.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You cannot be serious.
> > > > >
> > > > > Oh shit, you confronted a lib to back up
> > > their
> > > > > statement with fact.
> > > >
> > > > Actually the lib presented a fact and the
> > > > trumptard proposed a 'what if' its a loss
> > > backed
> > > > up by nothing.
> > > >
> > > > So what if your mom was a whore and you are
> > the
> > > > bastard child of a negro convict? This is
> > the
> > > > reason logic is difficult for you to follow.
>
> > > > Sorry.
> > >
> > > You have a problem with reading comprehension.
>
> > > The OP changed income in the subject to
> profit
> > in
> > > the body of the message. It's subtle word
> play
> > to
> > > sway the poorly educated.
> >
> > you make me laugh. You are busted and the best
> > you can come up with is that? Word profit was
> > used in a hypothetical. The fact of income by
> > Trumps remains. Its ok we know you like the
> pay
> > for play set-up the Trumps have now. Its super
> > MAGA
> >
> > lol, donkey.
>
> You have proven my point. Go back to grade
> school.
You lost the argument why not go for a walk before it rains - you will feel better.
Re: Jared and Ivanka Kushner pulled in 82 million dollars in outside income from their business enterprises around the world.
Posted by:
Ivankas deliciousness
()
Date: June 13, 2018 03:32PM
Ivanka is one sexy mama!
She invokes feelings of when I saw Marilyn Monroe for the first time(some like it hot movie)!
Beautiful and worthy to run for President in 2030!
Trump has wonderful genetics!
She invokes feelings of when I saw Marilyn Monroe for the first time(some like it hot movie)!
Beautiful and worthy to run for President in 2030!
Trump has wonderful genetics!
Re: Jared and Ivanka Kushner pulled in 82 million dollars in outside income from their business enterprises around the world.
Posted by:
Not Larry Sabato
()
Date: June 13, 2018 03:40PM
Ivankas deliciousness Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Ivanka is one sexy mama!
> She invokes feelings of when I saw Marilyn Monroe
> for the first time(some like it hot movie)!
>
> Beautiful and worthy to run for President in
> 2030!
> Trump has wonderful genetics!
Donald Trump 2016
Donald Trump 2020
Ivanka Kushner 2024
Ivanka Kushner 2028
-------------------------------------------------------
> Ivanka is one sexy mama!
> She invokes feelings of when I saw Marilyn Monroe
> for the first time(some like it hot movie)!
>
> Beautiful and worthy to run for President in
> 2030!
> Trump has wonderful genetics!
Donald Trump 2016
Donald Trump 2020
Ivanka Kushner 2024
Ivanka Kushner 2028
Re: Jared and Ivanka Kushner pulled in 82 million dollars in outside income from their business enterprises around the world.
Posted by:
What a Woman!
()
Date: June 13, 2018 03:58PM
So she's super sexy AND a brilliant business woman!
Re: Jared and Ivanka Kushner pulled in 82 million dollars in outside income from their business enterprises around the world.
Posted by:
that's America
()
Date: June 13, 2018 04:04PM
Free enterprise. The big cheese in NKorea wants a part of the pie. He is a party monster, Ted Kennedy RIP could have partied with this guy and showed him the real USA.
Re: Jared and Ivanka Kushner pulled in 82 million dollars in outside income from their business enterprises around the world.
Posted by:
just an observation
()
Date: June 13, 2018 04:43PM
sureokkk Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Trump and his royal family hide a large
> portion of their assets, income and almost all
> their income tax filings.
If it's hidden you don't know about it and cannot speak of it, because it's hidden.
See how full of shit you are?
-------------------------------------------------------
> Trump and his royal family hide a large
> portion of their assets, income and almost all
> their income tax filings.
If it's hidden you don't know about it and cannot speak of it, because it's hidden.
See how full of shit you are?
Re: Jared and Ivanka Kushner pulled in 82 million dollars in outside income from their business enterprises around the world.
Posted by:
dpcwk
()
Date: June 14, 2018 12:19AM
for profit Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> dpcwk Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > You are busted bro Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > 3uydy Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > analysis Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > President Trump FTW! Wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----
> > > > > > oh my god Wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----
> > > > > > > dpcwk Wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > -----
> > > > > > > > You do know that this stat is
> > > meaningless
> > > > > > > without
> > > > > > > > previous year's incomes. For all
> you
> > > > know
> > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > represents a year to year loss.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You cannot be serious.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Oh shit, you confronted a lib to back
> up
> > > > their
> > > > > > statement with fact.
> > > > >
> > > > > Actually the lib presented a fact and the
> > > > > trumptard proposed a 'what if' its a loss
> > > > backed
> > > > > up by nothing.
> > > > >
> > > > > So what if your mom was a whore and you
> are
> > > the
> > > > > bastard child of a negro convict? This
> is
> > > the
> > > > > reason logic is difficult for you to
> follow.
> >
> > > > > Sorry.
> > > >
> > > > You have a problem with reading
> comprehension.
> >
> > > > The OP changed income in the subject to
> > profit
> > > in
> > > > the body of the message. It's subtle word
> > play
> > > to
> > > > sway the poorly educated.
> > >
> > > you make me laugh. You are busted and the
> best
> > > you can come up with is that? Word profit
> was
> > > used in a hypothetical. The fact of income
> by
> > > Trumps remains. Its ok we know you like the
> > pay
> > > for play set-up the Trumps have now. Its
> super
> > > MAGA
> > >
> > > lol, donkey.
> >
> > You have proven my point. Go back to grade
> > school.
>
> You lost the argument why not go for a walk before
> it rains - you will feel better.
Calling income profit in a hypothetical doesn't make income profit. The comparison is always apples to oranges. Try replacing income with oranges and profit with apples. Does your hypothetical make sense? Let me answer that for you, no it doesn't.
Again until I see some evidence of actual profit I have no interest in this story.
-------------------------------------------------------
> dpcwk Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > You are busted bro Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > 3uydy Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > analysis Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > President Trump FTW! Wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----
> > > > > > oh my god Wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----
> > > > > > > dpcwk Wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > -----
> > > > > > > > You do know that this stat is
> > > meaningless
> > > > > > > without
> > > > > > > > previous year's incomes. For all
> you
> > > > know
> > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > represents a year to year loss.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You cannot be serious.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Oh shit, you confronted a lib to back
> up
> > > > their
> > > > > > statement with fact.
> > > > >
> > > > > Actually the lib presented a fact and the
> > > > > trumptard proposed a 'what if' its a loss
> > > > backed
> > > > > up by nothing.
> > > > >
> > > > > So what if your mom was a whore and you
> are
> > > the
> > > > > bastard child of a negro convict? This
> is
> > > the
> > > > > reason logic is difficult for you to
> follow.
> >
> > > > > Sorry.
> > > >
> > > > You have a problem with reading
> comprehension.
> >
> > > > The OP changed income in the subject to
> > profit
> > > in
> > > > the body of the message. It's subtle word
> > play
> > > to
> > > > sway the poorly educated.
> > >
> > > you make me laugh. You are busted and the
> best
> > > you can come up with is that? Word profit
> was
> > > used in a hypothetical. The fact of income
> by
> > > Trumps remains. Its ok we know you like the
> > pay
> > > for play set-up the Trumps have now. Its
> super
> > > MAGA
> > >
> > > lol, donkey.
> >
> > You have proven my point. Go back to grade
> > school.
>
> You lost the argument why not go for a walk before
> it rains - you will feel better.
Calling income profit in a hypothetical doesn't make income profit. The comparison is always apples to oranges. Try replacing income with oranges and profit with apples. Does your hypothetical make sense? Let me answer that for you, no it doesn't.
Again until I see some evidence of actual profit I have no interest in this story.