Once the 2nd amendment is modified we will have to disarm the American population. First of all, federal or state laws would need to make it a crime punishable by a $1,000 fine and one year in prison per weapon to possess a firearm. The population would then be given three months to turn in their guns, without penalty.

Hunters would be able to deposit their hunting weapons in a centrally located arsenal, heavily guarded, from which they would be able to withdraw them each hunting season upon presentation of a valid hunting license. The weapons would be required to be redeposited at the end of the season on pain of arrest. When hunters submitted their request for their weapons, federal, state and local checks would be made to establish that they had not been convicted of a violent crime since the last time they withdrew their weapons. In the process, arsenal staff would take at least a quick look at each hunter to try to affirm that he was not obviously unhinged.

It would have to be the case that the term "hunting weapon" did not include anti-tank ordnance, assault weapons, rocket-propelled grenade launchers or other weapons of war.

All antique or interesting nonhunting weapons would be required to be delivered to a local or regional museum, also to be under strict 24-hour-a-day guard. There they would be on display, if the owner desired, as part of an interesting exhibit of antique American weapons, as family heirlooms from proud wars past or as part of collections.

Gun dealers could continue their work, selling hunting and antique firearms. Dealers would be required to maintain very tight inventories. Any gun sold would be delivered immediately by the dealer to the nearest arsenal or the museum, not to the buyer.

The disarmament process would begin after the initial three-month amnesty. Special squads of police would be formed and trained to carry out the work. Then, on a random basis to permit no advance warning, city blocks and stretches of suburban and rural areas would be cordoned off and searches carried out in every business, dwelling and empty building. Thoroughness would be at the level of the sort of search that is carried out in Crime Scene Investigations. All firearms would be seized. The owners of weapons found in the searches would be prosecuted: $1,000 and one year in prison for each firearm.

Clearly, since such sweeps could not take place all across a city, county, state or the country at the same time, guns would move. But fairly quickly there would begin to be gun-swept, gun-free areas where there should be no firearms. If there were, those carrying them would be subject to quick confiscation and prosecution. On the streets it would be a question of stopping and searching anyone, even Grandma with her walker, with the same penalties for "carrying."

i thought cops were out to kill all black and brown people?

Now you're going to have federal agents going door to door looking for weapons?

I wonder if rich crackas in Great Falls will be treated the same as Baltimore blacks when they start kicking in doors....

sweet troll but too many cucked libs actually think this scenario is plausible

.....a great idea!

Something weird would happen like all constitution lovers would pick 10-20 soft target liberals to shoot all on the same day before attempted confiscation.

Something like that would probably happen since it would be easy to do and make it so there would never be enough votes for liberals to win ever again . I would hope that wouldn't happen but it would be a logical and easy war strategy.

I can tell the OP hasn't been around the country much. Try this in Texas or Montana and see what happens.

yknt Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I can tell the OP hasn't been around the country
> much. Try this in Texas or Montana and see what
> happens.


Remember that 99% of gun owners are complete cowards.

"Femininity and fear" That describes gun enthusiasts in three words.

yknt Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I can tell the OP hasn't been around the country
> much. Try this in Texas or Montana and see what
> happens.

This is what happens in Waco. Waco's in Texas right?
Attachments:

^^^ that's why I think the 2nd ammendment protectors will shoot soft target liberals by the millions all over the country if anything happens. I don't agree with the strategy on moral grounds but they why take on the government when you can achieve your objective with no resistance. I hope this kind of thing never occurs because I don't think liberal people see it coming and it would be a tragic bloodbath.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!

Thanks for the laugh OP!!!!!!!!!

Lol!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Just like they get hard ons every time a school shooting happens cuz they feel entitled to whine

they would love more Wacos to happen as long as the innocent children being burned alive are white and conservative

The time is: 4:20, p.m.

Kurt Schlichter - Why Democrats Would Lose the Second ...


townhall.com › columnists › Kurt Schlichter
4 days ago

keep in mind...... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> yknt Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I can tell the OP hasn't been around the
> country
> > much. Try this in Texas or Montana and see
> what
> > happens.
>
>
> Remember that 99% of gun owners grabbers are complete
> cowards.

femininity and fear Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> "Femininity and fear" That describes gun
> enthusiasts in three words.


EXACTLY!

femininity and fear Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> "Femininity and fear" That describes gun
> enthusiasts in three words.


Two peer reviewed studies (one from the UK and one from the US) have shown that liberal men have substantially more estrogen than conservative men, who have substantially more testosterone.

Conservatives aren't looking for the government to protect them and their families. It's liberals. Liberals fear guns. Liberals fear free speech. Liberals fear religion. Liberals fear people choosing who they want to live next to and who they want to associate with. Liberals feared the Tea Party when they marched on DC. Liberals support a police state where people can have their property seized and doors can be kicked in. Is there any fucking part of the Bill of Rights that you scum do support?

Deranged liberals Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!
>
> Thanks for the laugh OP!!!!!!!!!
>
> Lol!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

There was sooo much wrong with the OP's post that it is not worthy of reading past the first sentence. Check out what is necessary to amend the Constitution and get back to us with a reasonable idea!!!

Lol!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Let me interject some facts Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> femininity and fear Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > "Femininity and fear" That describes gun
> > enthusiasts in three words.
>
>
> Two peer reviewed studies (one from the UK and one
> from the US) have shown that liberal men have
> substantially more estrogen than conservative men,
> who have substantially more testosterone.
>
> Conservatives aren't looking for the government to
> protect them and their families. It's liberals.
> Liberals fear guns. Liberals fear free speech.
> Liberals fear religion. Liberals fear people
> choosing who they want to live next to and who
> they want to associate with. Liberals feared the
> Tea Party when they marched on DC. Liberals
> support a police state where people can have their
> property seized and doors can be kicked in. Is
> there any fucking part of the Bill of Rights that
> you scum do support?


Methinks thou doth protest too much.

You are a queer!

Inquisitive One Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Deranged liberals Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!
> >
> > Thanks for the laugh OP!!!!!!!!!
> >
> > Lol!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
> There was sooo much wrong with the OP's post that
> it is not worthy of reading past the first
> sentence. Check out what is necessary to amend
> the Constitution and get back to us with a
> reasonable idea!!!
>
> Lol!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


At least you are smart enough to get the joke. You have to admit the majority of gun owners are not too bright.

How much did the NRA pay you to put that out Bill. The days when gun control was synonymous with banning private ownership of firearms is over. Except for a small fringe Americans, including gun control advocates, accept that private ownership of guns for law abiding citizens will remain.

I hear they will scan your lawn for buried guns too.

Bill Brady Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Once the 2nd amendment is modified we will have to
> disarm the American population. First of all,
> federal or state laws would need to make it a
> crime punishable by a $1,000 fine and one year in
> prison per weapon to possess a firearm. The
> population would then be given three months to
> turn in their guns, without penalty.
>
> Hunters would be able to deposit their hunting
> weapons in a centrally located arsenal, heavily
> guarded, from which they would be able to withdraw
> them each hunting season upon presentation of a
> valid hunting license. The weapons would be
> required to be redeposited at the end of the
> season on pain of arrest. When hunters submitted
> their request for their weapons, federal, state
> and local checks would be made to establish that
> they had not been convicted of a violent crime
> since the last time they withdrew their weapons.
> In the process, arsenal staff would take at least
> a quick look at each hunter to try to affirm that
> he was not obviously unhinged.
>
> It would have to be the case that the term
> "hunting weapon" did not include anti-tank
> ordnance, assault weapons, rocket-propelled
> grenade launchers or other weapons of war.
>
> All antique or interesting nonhunting weapons
> would be required to be delivered to a local or
> regional museum, also to be under strict
> 24-hour-a-day guard. There they would be on
> display, if the owner desired, as part of an
> interesting exhibit of antique American weapons,
> as family heirlooms from proud wars past or as
> part of collections.
>
> Gun dealers could continue their work, selling
> hunting and antique firearms. Dealers would be
> required to maintain very tight inventories. Any
> gun sold would be delivered immediately by the
> dealer to the nearest arsenal or the museum, not
> to the buyer.
>
> The disarmament process would begin after the
> initial three-month amnesty. Special squads of
> police would be formed and trained to carry out
> the work. Then, on a random basis to permit no
> advance warning, city blocks and stretches of
> suburban and rural areas would be cordoned off and
> searches carried out in every business, dwelling
> and empty building. Thoroughness would be at the
> level of the sort of search that is carried out in
> Crime Scene Investigations. All firearms would be
> seized. The owners of weapons found in the
> searches would be prosecuted: $1,000 and one year
> in prison for each firearm.
>
> Clearly, since such sweeps could not take place
> all across a city, county, state or the country at
> the same time, guns would move. But fairly quickly
> there would begin to be gun-swept, gun-free areas
> where there should be no firearms. If there were,
> those carrying them would be subject to quick
> confiscation and prosecution. On the streets it
> would be a question of stopping and searching
> anyone, even Grandma with her walker, with the
> same penalties for "carrying."


That is a good plan and a good start.

Disarming America? Why not please take away the forks and spoons too? I mean without citizens being able to own a gun, they may take to forking or spooning each other violently while the criminals, who are the only ones now holding the guns sit back and enjoy... hmmm

shake spear Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Methinks thou doth protest too much.

It is "dost" in second-person ("you") singular. You just said "I think you he protests too much".


Yet another reason we need to protect schools with good guys with guns... maybe kids will be in there longer and learn this stuff.

As for the OP's fantasy scenario, make him run point on the squads invading armed households.

educated conservative Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> shake spear Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Methinks thou doth protest too much.
>
> It is "dost" in second-person ("you") singular.
> You just said "I think you he protests too much".
>
>
> Yet another reason we need to protect schools with
> good guys with guns... maybe kids will be in there
> longer and learn this stuff.
>
> As for the OP's fantasy scenario, make him run
> point on the squads invading armed households.


He didn't 'say' anything. He wrote something. What he wrote was stupid, lame and juvenile, but such is the way of the triggered libtards here.

What Clinton and his criminal gang learned after Waco is, you can kill 100 US citizens, including 28 children, if you control the media's message and lie enough about it. Don't think for 1 minute that the government won't try and kill you if you get in the way. The rule of law has been gone for decades. We are a facade of what we once were.

First, let's remove suicides from the gun death numbers and then have a reasonable discussion about new gun laws. About 2/3 of the "gun deaths" are suicides. How are stricter gun laws going to prevent those deaths?

Second, let's remove the ones where the shooter obtained the gun illegally (i.e., gang murders). Clearly more gun laws aren't going to prevent these deaths.

Once you do that, my guess is that there are about 4-5000 firearm deaths a year in the country. Probably the vast majority of those end up being domestic disputes that go wrong and bad. 4-5000 in a country of 300000000? That is a drop in the bucket, 0.000017% and unless it directly impacts you, it's a non issue.

Tell you what, let's ban cheeseburgers, pizza and Snickers, they kill WAY more people than guns.

GCJ6F Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> First, let's remove suicides from the gun death
> numbers and then have a reasonable discussion
> about new gun laws. About 2/3 of the "gun deaths"
> are suicides. How are stricter gun laws going to
> prevent those deaths?
>
> Second, let's remove the ones where the shooter
> obtained the gun illegally (i.e., gang murders).
> Clearly more gun laws aren't going to prevent
> these deaths.
>
> Once you do that, my guess is that there are about
> 4-5000 firearm deaths a year in the country.
> Probably the vast majority of those end up being
> domestic disputes that go wrong and bad. 4-5000 in
> a country of 300000000? That is a drop in the
> bucket, 0.000017% and unless it directly impacts
> you, it's a non issue.
>
> Tell you what, let's ban cheeseburgers, pizza and
> Snickers, they kill WAY more people than guns.


Why are you such a coward?

The pro gun crowd sure got their asses kicked in this thread.

Bill Brady Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Once the 2nd amendment is modified we will have to
> disarm the American population. First of all,
> federal or state laws would need to make it a
> crime punishable by a $1,000 fine and one year in
> prison per weapon to possess a firearm. The
> population would then be given three months to
> turn in their guns, without penalty.
>
> Hunters would be able to deposit their hunting
> weapons in a centrally located arsenal, heavily
> guarded, from which they would be able to withdraw
> them each hunting season upon presentation of a
> valid hunting license. The weapons would be
> required to be redeposited at the end of the
> season on pain of arrest. When hunters submitted
> their request for their weapons, federal, state
> and local checks would be made to establish that
> they had not been convicted of a violent crime
> since the last time they withdrew their weapons.
> In the process, arsenal staff would take at least
> a quick look at each hunter to try to affirm that
> he was not obviously unhinged.
>
> It would have to be the case that the term
> "hunting weapon" did not include anti-tank
> ordnance, assault weapons, rocket-propelled
> grenade launchers or other weapons of war.
>
> All antique or interesting nonhunting weapons
> would be required to be delivered to a local or
> regional museum, also to be under strict
> 24-hour-a-day guard. There they would be on
> display, if the owner desired, as part of an
> interesting exhibit of antique American weapons,
> as family heirlooms from proud wars past or as
> part of collections.
>
> Gun dealers could continue their work, selling
> hunting and antique firearms. Dealers would be
> required to maintain very tight inventories. Any
> gun sold would be delivered immediately by the
> dealer to the nearest arsenal or the museum, not
> to the buyer.
>
> The disarmament process would begin after the
> initial three-month amnesty. Special squads of
> police would be formed and trained to carry out
> the work. Then, on a random basis to permit no
> advance warning, city blocks and stretches of
> suburban and rural areas would be cordoned off and
> searches carried out in every business, dwelling
> and empty building. Thoroughness would be at the
> level of the sort of search that is carried out in
> Crime Scene Investigations. All firearms would be
> seized. The owners of weapons found in the
> searches would be prosecuted: $1,000 and one year
> in prison for each firearm.
>
> Clearly, since such sweeps could not take place
> all across a city, county, state or the country at
> the same time, guns would move. But fairly quickly
> there would begin to be gun-swept, gun-free areas
> where there should be no firearms. If there were,
> those carrying them would be subject to quick
> confiscation and prosecution. On the streets it
> would be a question of stopping and searching
> anyone, even Grandma with her walker, with the
> same penalties for "carrying."


Years ago our federal government tried to take away our alcoholic beverages. That went well.

plain old pearson Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Bill Brady Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Once the 2nd amendment is modified we will have
> to
> > disarm the American population. First of all,
> > federal or state laws would need to make it a
> > crime punishable by a $1,000 fine and one year
> in
> > prison per weapon to possess a firearm. The
> > population would then be given three months to
> > turn in their guns, without penalty.
> >
> > Hunters would be able to deposit their hunting
> > weapons in a centrally located arsenal, heavily
> > guarded, from which they would be able to
> withdraw
> > them each hunting season upon presentation of a
> > valid hunting license. The weapons would be
> > required to be redeposited at the end of the
> > season on pain of arrest. When hunters
> submitted
> > their request for their weapons, federal, state
> > and local checks would be made to establish
> that
> > they had not been convicted of a violent crime
> > since the last time they withdrew their
> weapons.
> > In the process, arsenal staff would take at
> least
> > a quick look at each hunter to try to affirm
> that
> > he was not obviously unhinged.
> >
> > It would have to be the case that the term
> > "hunting weapon" did not include anti-tank
> > ordnance, assault weapons, rocket-propelled
> > grenade launchers or other weapons of war.
> >
> > All antique or interesting nonhunting weapons
> > would be required to be delivered to a local or
> > regional museum, also to be under strict
> > 24-hour-a-day guard. There they would be on
> > display, if the owner desired, as part of an
> > interesting exhibit of antique American
> weapons,
> > as family heirlooms from proud wars past or as
> > part of collections.
> >
> > Gun dealers could continue their work, selling
> > hunting and antique firearms. Dealers would be
> > required to maintain very tight inventories.
> Any
> > gun sold would be delivered immediately by the
> > dealer to the nearest arsenal or the museum,
> not
> > to the buyer.
> >
> > The disarmament process would begin after the
> > initial three-month amnesty. Special squads of
> > police would be formed and trained to carry out
> > the work. Then, on a random basis to permit no
> > advance warning, city blocks and stretches of
> > suburban and rural areas would be cordoned off
> and
> > searches carried out in every business,
> dwelling
> > and empty building. Thoroughness would be at
> the
> > level of the sort of search that is carried out
> in
> > Crime Scene Investigations. All firearms would
> be
> > seized. The owners of weapons found in the
> > searches would be prosecuted: $1,000 and one
> year
> > in prison for each firearm.
> >
> > Clearly, since such sweeps could not take place
> > all across a city, county, state or the country
> at
> > the same time, guns would move. But fairly
> quickly
> > there would begin to be gun-swept, gun-free
> areas
> > where there should be no firearms. If there
> were,
> > those carrying them would be subject to quick
> > confiscation and prosecution. On the streets it
> > would be a question of stopping and searching
> > anyone, even Grandma with her walker, with the
> > same penalties for "carrying."
>
>
> Years ago our federal government tried to take
> away our alcoholic beverages. That went well.

The War on Drugs has been extremely effective too.

They will ban assault firearms, and the guns will be smuggled into the USA by Illegals, Democrats smiling at them at the open border putting out the welcome mat, So the guns will never go away, they will just be in possession of drug and other criminal gangs who will become more brazen in robbing liberals who work in the cities and urban areas with deadly force

Damn.

femininity and fear Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> "Femininity and fear" That describes gun
> enthusiasts in three words.


exactly.

It's not going to happen completly in our lifetime but eventually this country will be disarmed. There is just no way around it.

keep in mind...... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> yknt Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I can tell the OP hasn't been around the
> country
> > much. Try this in Texas or Montana and see
> what
> > happens.
>
>
> Remember that 99% of gun owners are complete
> cowards.
Citation needed, dumb nigger.

constitutional expert Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It's not going to happen completly in our lifetime
> but eventually this country will be disarmed.
> There is just no way around it.


You're apparently ruled by your emotions and so you clearly are nno who you claim to be.

constitutional expert Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It's not going to happen completly in our lifetime
> but eventually this country will be disarmed.
> There is just no way around it.


Everybody knows that but are we talking 50 years? 100 years? More?

HS teacher Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> constitutional expert Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > It's not going to happen completly in our
> lifetime
> > but eventually this country will be disarmed.
> > There is just no way around it.
>
>
> Everybody knows that but are we talking 50 years?
> 100 years? More?

In 25 years we could confiscate 80% of the guns but quite a few gun owners will have to be put in prison and that is going to be expensive.

"All antique or interesting nonhunting weapons would be required to be delivered to a local or regional museum"

error

"All antique or interesting nonhunting weapons would be required to be delivered to a local or regional museum DAILY"

YOU DON'T KNOW DEMOCRATS, DO YOU?

HS teacher Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> constitutional expert Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > It's not going to happen completly in our
> lifetime
> > but eventually this country will be disarmed.
> > There is just no way around it.
>
>
> Everybody knows that but are we talking 50 years?
> 100 years? More?

It will NEVER happen.
1. It is a RIGHT.
2. Pro Gun way outnumbers you ill informed grabbers.
3. Blood bath.

gun owner 123 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I hear they will scan your lawn for buried guns
> too.

only in white democrat areas searching for republicans

in black/hispanic areas, they will already have sold the scanner on ebay!

I introduced emoticons to "instruct studnets" that school shooters suck to the school system which they can install if they find the download site: and got allot of government grant money. work smarter not harder suckers!

I introduced emoticons to the school system, which they can install if they find the download site, that "instruct students" that school shooters suck: and I got allot of government grant money. work smarter not harder suckers!

,
Attachments:

Phil Intheblanks Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> HS teacher Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > constitutional expert Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > It's not going to happen completly in our
> > lifetime
> > > but eventually this country will be disarmed.
> > > There is just no way around it.
> >
> >
> > Everybody knows that but are we talking 50
> years?
> > 100 years? More?
>
> In 25 years we could confiscate 80% of the guns
> but quite a few gun owners will have to be put in
> prison and that is going to be expensive.


Gun owners belong in prison.

To All my Black Brothers and Sisters NEVER GIVE UP YOUR GUNS!! They are your key to continued Freedom.

LEST WE FORGET

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rosewood,_Florida
And some more.
http://www.old-yankee.com/rkba/racial_laws.html

Then we have the Jim Crow laws.

Gun Control is not about Crime reduction.It is about putting the Black Man back on the Plantation, The Mills, The factories at slave wages. It is about white devils and White Daddies breeding us out. It is about taking away the one thing they fear most. An armed black man in control of his own destiny.


I don't trust white people. You come for more guns on Monday and by Friday you come with a rope. Go to hell with that shit.Sure we got some stuff to work out with each other but listen up whitey ain't woke. This isn't about BLM or any of that. This is about what has always happened when a large group of whites meets an unarmed black.

NEVER TRUST THE WHITE MAN. Ask Sitting bull how that worked out .

Looked at CTs laws on standard capacity mags. Violations are $90 for the first, up to $5,000 for subsequent. What I have boxed in my workshop would get me nearly $1,450,100.00 in fines! Too bad they’re all going to be lost in a boating accident should the day come when such madness reigns in Dixie.

lib logic Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> i thought cops were out to kill all black and
> brown people?
>
> Now you're going to have federal agents going door
> to door looking for weapons?
>
> I wonder if rich crackas in Great Falls will be
> treated the same as Baltimore blacks when they
> start kicking in doors....
>
> sweet troll but too many cucked libs actually
> think this scenario is plausible

How much has shit changed in Baltimore since King was shot in his nappy woolen Head?
“I have a dream....” BAM! “I have a head wound....”
Glad Baltimore niggers voted for trump bc Hillary is a liar.

We are going to fuck 2A up!

This is gonna be great!

Bill Brady Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Once the 2nd amendment is modified we will have to
> disarm the American population. First of all,
> federal or state laws would need to make it a
> crime punishable by a $1,000 fine and one year in
> prison per weapon to possess a firearm. The
> population would then be given three months to
> turn in their guns, without penalty.
>
> Hunters would be able to deposit their hunting
> weapons in a centrally located arsenal, heavily
> guarded, from which they would be able to withdraw
> them each hunting season upon presentation of a
> valid hunting license. The weapons would be
> required to be redeposited at the end of the
> season on pain of arrest. When hunters submitted
> their request for their weapons, federal, state
> and local checks would be made to establish that
> they had not been convicted of a violent crime
> since the last time they withdrew their weapons.
> In the process, arsenal staff would take at least
> a quick look at each hunter to try to affirm that
> he was not obviously unhinged.
>
> It would have to be the case that the term
> "hunting weapon" did not include anti-tank
> ordnance, assault weapons, rocket-propelled
> grenade launchers or other weapons of war.
>
> All antique or interesting nonhunting weapons
> would be required to be delivered to a local or
> regional museum, also to be under strict
> 24-hour-a-day guard. There they would be on
> display, if the owner desired, as part of an
> interesting exhibit of antique American weapons,
> as family heirlooms from proud wars past or as
> part of collections.
>
> Gun dealers could continue their work, selling
> hunting and antique firearms. Dealers would be
> required to maintain very tight inventories. Any
> gun sold would be delivered immediately by the
> dealer to the nearest arsenal or the museum, not
> to the buyer.
>
> The disarmament process would begin after the
> initial three-month amnesty. Special squads of
> police would be formed and trained to carry out
> the work. Then, on a random basis to permit no
> advance warning, city blocks and stretches of
> suburban and rural areas would be cordoned off and
> searches carried out in every business, dwelling
> and empty building. Thoroughness would be at the
> level of the sort of search that is carried out in
> Crime Scene Investigations. All firearms would be
> seized. The owners of weapons found in the
> searches would be prosecuted: $1,000 and one year
> in prison for each firearm.
>
> Clearly, since such sweeps could not take place
> all across a city, county, state or the country at
> the same time, guns would move. But fairly quickly
> there would begin to be gun-swept, gun-free areas
> where there should be no firearms. If there were,
> those carrying them would be subject to quick
> confiscation and prosecution. On the streets it
> would be a question of stopping and searching
> anyone, even Grandma with her walker, with the
> same penalties for "carrying."


That's going to take 50 years but it has to be done.

james6. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Bill Brady Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Once the 2nd amendment is modified we will have
> to
> > disarm the American population. First of all,
> > federal or state laws would need to make it a
> > crime punishable by a $1,000 fine and one year
> in
> > prison per weapon to possess a firearm. The
> > population would then be given three months to
> > turn in their guns, without penalty.
> >
> > Hunters would be able to deposit their hunting
> > weapons in a centrally located arsenal, heavily
> > guarded, from which they would be able to
> withdraw
> > them each hunting season upon presentation of a
> > valid hunting license. The weapons would be
> > required to be redeposited at the end of the
> > season on pain of arrest. When hunters
> submitted
> > their request for their weapons, federal, state
> > and local checks would be made to establish
> that
> > they had not been convicted of a violent crime
> > since the last time they withdrew their
> weapons.
> > In the process, arsenal staff would take at
> least
> > a quick look at each hunter to try to affirm
> that
> > he was not obviously unhinged.
> >
> > It would have to be the case that the term
> > "hunting weapon" did not include anti-tank
> > ordnance, assault weapons, rocket-propelled
> > grenade launchers or other weapons of war.
> >
> > All antique or interesting nonhunting weapons
> > would be required to be delivered to a local or
> > regional museum, also to be under strict
> > 24-hour-a-day guard. There they would be on
> > display, if the owner desired, as part of an
> > interesting exhibit of antique American
> weapons,
> > as family heirlooms from proud wars past or as
> > part of collections.
> >
> > Gun dealers could continue their work, selling
> > hunting and antique firearms. Dealers would be
> > required to maintain very tight inventories.
> Any
> > gun sold would be delivered immediately by the
> > dealer to the nearest arsenal or the museum,
> not
> > to the buyer.
> >
> > The disarmament process would begin after the
> > initial three-month amnesty. Special squads of
> > police would be formed and trained to carry out
> > the work. Then, on a random basis to permit no
> > advance warning, city blocks and stretches of
> > suburban and rural areas would be cordoned off
> and
> > searches carried out in every business,
> dwelling
> > and empty building. Thoroughness would be at
> the
> > level of the sort of search that is carried out
> in
> > Crime Scene Investigations. All firearms would
> be
> > seized. The owners of weapons found in the
> > searches would be prosecuted: $1,000 and one
> year
> > in prison for each firearm.
> >
> > Clearly, since such sweeps could not take place
> > all across a city, county, state or the country
> at
> > the same time, guns would move. But fairly
> quickly
> > there would begin to be gun-swept, gun-free
> areas
> > where there should be no firearms. If there
> were,
> > those carrying them would be subject to quick
> > confiscation and prosecution. On the streets it
> > would be a question of stopping and searching
> > anyone, even Grandma with her walker, with the
> > same penalties for "carrying."
>
>
> That's going to take 50 years but it has to be
> done.


Time to get started on this.

People will be killing each other until Jesus's Judgement of the Earth is Over with.
In all of mankind's history, there has only been 200 years of peace (time without war), not to mention that people STILL were killing each other.
Think about it.
Taking something away won't work.
Mankind has a sin problem. Period.

I for one won't be turning in anything and I think my opinion is in the Majority.
I am not going down or losing my rights because some "hurt" teen shot up his classmates who never were taught how to "love their neighbor".

I say we just burn the south down again.

Piss and Dung Powder Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> People will be killing each other until Jesus's
> Judgement of the Earth is Over with.
> In all of mankind's history, there has only been
> 200 years of peace (time without war), not to
> mention that people STILL were killing each
> other.
> Think about it.
> Taking something away won't work.
> Mankind has a sin problem. Period.
>
> I for one won't be turning in anything and I think
> my opinion is in the Majority.
> I am not going down or losing my rights because
> some "hurt" teen shot up his classmates who never
> were taught how to "love their neighbor".


You are right. Still, everyone has to give up their guns eventually. Just a fact of life.

adjustable sights Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Piss and Dung Powder Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > People will be killing each other until Jesus's
> > Judgement of the Earth is Over with.
> > In all of mankind's history, there has only
> been
> > 200 years of peace (time without war), not to
> > mention that people STILL were killing each
> > other.
> > Think about it.
> > Taking something away won't work.
> > Mankind has a sin problem. Period.
> >
> > I for one won't be turning in anything and I
> think
> > my opinion is in the Majority.
> > I am not going down or losing my rights because
> > some "hurt" teen shot up his classmates who
> never
> > were taught how to "love their neighbor".
>
>
> You are right. Still, everyone has to give up
> their guns eventually. Just a fact of life.


Yeah good luck with that homie.

adjustable sights Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Piss and Dung Powder Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > People will be killing each other until Jesus's
> > Judgement of the Earth is Over with.
> > In all of mankind's history, there has only
> been
> > 200 years of peace (time without war), not to
> > mention that people STILL were killing each
> > other.
> > Think about it.
> > Taking something away won't work.
> > Mankind has a sin problem. Period.
> >
> > I for one won't be turning in anything and I
> think
> > my opinion is in the Majority.
> > I am not going down or losing my rights because
> > some "hurt" teen shot up his classmates who
> never
> > were taught how to "love their neighbor".
>
>
> You are right. Still, everyone has to give up
> their guns eventually. Just a fact of life.


A lot of NRA members will end up being killed by the government, so sad.

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I say we just burn the south down again.


How incredibly racist of you.

constitutional expert Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It's not going to happen completly in our lifetime
> but eventually this country will be disarmed.
> There is just no way around it.


True 2

sounds like...... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> .....a great idea!


Yes it is.

simple - tax gunpowder. One dollar per grain would do. Guess $7,000 per pound tax would make folks think before they fire off a $5 round. Imagine having to lay down $7k in Federal tax on a pound of Alliant RL17. It would be fucking brilliant.

Still worth it for hunting game where you only fire a few rounds. The shotgunners would get hosed but oh well. the Assault Style Rifle owners would no longer be able to afford shooting up abandoned autos and washing machines either.

Bill Brady Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Once the 2nd amendment is modified we will have to
> disarm the American population. First of all,
> federal or state laws would need to make it a
> crime punishable by a $1,000 fine and one year in
> prison per weapon to possess a firearm. The
> population would then be given three months to
> turn in their guns, without penalty.
>
> Hunters would be able to deposit their hunting
> weapons in a centrally located arsenal, heavily
> guarded, from which they would be able to withdraw
> them each hunting season upon presentation of a
> valid hunting license. The weapons would be
> required to be redeposited at the end of the
> season on pain of arrest. When hunters submitted
> their request for their weapons, federal, state
> and local checks would be made to establish that
> they had not been convicted of a violent crime
> since the last time they withdrew their weapons.
> In the process, arsenal staff would take at least
> a quick look at each hunter to try to affirm that
> he was not obviously unhinged.
>
> It would have to be the case that the term
> "hunting weapon" did not include anti-tank
> ordnance, assault weapons, rocket-propelled
> grenade launchers or other weapons of war.
>
> All antique or interesting nonhunting weapons
> would be required to be delivered to a local or
> regional museum, also to be under strict
> 24-hour-a-day guard. There they would be on
> display, if the owner desired, as part of an
> interesting exhibit of antique American weapons,
> as family heirlooms from proud wars past or as
> part of collections.
>
> Gun dealers could continue their work, selling
> hunting and antique firearms. Dealers would be
> required to maintain very tight inventories. Any
> gun sold would be delivered immediately by the
> dealer to the nearest arsenal or the museum, not
> to the buyer.
>
> The disarmament process would begin after the
> initial three-month amnesty. Special squads of
> police would be formed and trained to carry out
> the work. Then, on a random basis to permit no
> advance warning, city blocks and stretches of
> suburban and rural areas would be cordoned off and
> searches carried out in every business, dwelling
> and empty building. Thoroughness would be at the
> level of the sort of search that is carried out in
> Crime Scene Investigations. All firearms would be
> seized. The owners of weapons found in the
> searches would be prosecuted: $1,000 and one year
> in prison for each firearm.
>
> Clearly, since such sweeps could not take place
> all across a city, county, state or the country at
> the same time, guns would move. But fairly quickly
> there would begin to be gun-swept, gun-free areas
> where there should be no firearms. If there were,
> those carrying them would be subject to quick
> confiscation and prosecution. On the streets it
> would be a question of stopping and searching
> anyone, even Grandma with her walker, with the
> same penalties for "carrying."


Great idea!

OP is clearly another deluded pussyhat wearing liberal living in a fantasy world where the government, employing soft headed fools like himself, will take of everything and make all our problems go away.

OP is a right wing troll trying to stir up controversy.

lol

New Zealand just passed almost exactly the same thing. So far, they have had about 530 semi-automatic long guns turned in out of an estimated 300,000.

20% of sheriffs have already said they would not comply with any law that made owning firearms illegal.

Per usual, only the in the libarded cities and suburbs would LEO try and enforce this. LEO in conservatives states and localities would ignore it.

OP is a ass clown. I generally don’t wish people irritable bowels but may they get IBS.

dtfkw Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> lol
>
> New Zealand just passed almost exactly the same
> thing. So far, they have had about 530
> semi-automatic long guns turned in out of an
> estimated 300,000.
>
> 20% of sheriffs have already said they would not
> comply with any law that made owning firearms
> illegal.
>
> Per usual, only the in the libarded cities and
> suburbs would LEO try and enforce this. LEO in
> conservatives states and localities would ignore
> it.


You have just proven that you are purely ignorant, lol. So ignorant in fact that I won't waste any time trying to explain it to you as you are too ignorant to understand.

& so is the dumbfuck who revived a year old thread.

It will take 70 years to round up 90% of the guns. We need to get started soon. First thing we have to do is modify the 2A. That should be completed by 2024.

But aren't the police racists who hunt black men?

And the military inbred low-IQ baby killers?

So wouldn't the racist police and a dictator like Trump then control all of the guns?

ukden Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> But aren't the police racists who hunt black men?
>
> And the military inbred low-IQ baby killers?
>
> So wouldn't the racist police and a dictator like
> Trump then control all of the guns?


As always it's a Liberal power grab to control all people and give them no escape. Gotta take their guns.

Sugarcoat that with a fantasy for the Liberal Public where all guns are gone, we all rejoice in perfect safety and all children ride unicorns.

Want to see what happens with no guns? Big guys with machetes rule and you have more knife crime in London than New York City has gun crime.

If you only had a brain Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> dtfkw Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > lol
> >
> > New Zealand just passed almost exactly the same
> > thing. So far, they have had about 530
> > semi-automatic long guns turned in out of an
> > estimated 300,000.
> >
> > 20% of sheriffs have already said they would
> not
> > comply with any law that made owning firearms
> > illegal.
> >
> > Per usual, only the in the libarded cities and
> > suburbs would LEO try and enforce this. LEO in
> > conservatives states and localities would
> ignore
> > it.
>
>
> You have just proven that you are purely ignorant,
> lol. So ignorant in fact that I won't waste any
> time trying to explain it to you as you are too
> ignorant to understand.


Facts and libtardation don't mix, as the post above demonstrates perfectly.

Good govt Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It will take 70 years to round up 90% of the guns.
> We need to get started soon. First thing we have
> to do is modify the 2A. That should be completed
> by 2024.


It is our patriotic duty to take all the guns but I think it will be over a hundred years to get 90% of them.

constitutional expert Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It's not going to happen completly in our lifetime
> but eventually this country will be disarmed.
> There is just no way around it.

I think you are right.

Bill Brady Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Once the 2nd amendment is modified blah blah blah

Because there are plenty of Dems like myself who won't support this - enough that it is politically unviable.

I've considered selling my guns back to the government,
but after a background check and thorough investigation
into the buyer, I determined the buyer has a history of
violence, is mentally unstable, has a propensity to ignore
the law and is a danger to everyone around it

Anyone who votes for Trump proves that they are mentally disturbed and they can be disarmed under current laws.

^^^ Clearly an idiotic triggered libtard. Go back down to your parents basement and stop bothering us

go get em now! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Anyone who votes for Trump proves that they are
> mentally disturbed and they can be disarmed under
> current laws.

I have a Trumptarded neighbor who has a bunch of guns. He does admit to being a coward so I give him credit for that.

just sayin.. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I've considered selling my guns back to the
> government,
> but after a background check and thorough
> investigation
> into the buyer, I determined the buyer has a
> history of
> violence, is mentally unstable, has a propensity
> to ignore
> the law and is a danger to everyone around it


Keep at least one. Better than regrets! Whenever someone says I don't need a gun anymore, I make sure I have one that works. Just saying!

my trumptard neighbor had a rifle. During one of his drunken tantrums I took it away from him and smashed it against a tree. He was very angry and called the cops. They came, told him to go to bed, and confiscated the gun pieces as 'evidence'. Nothing happened to me.

my trumptard neighbor Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> my trumptard neighbor had a rifle. During one of
> his drunken tantrums I took it away from him and
> smashed it against a tree. He was very angry and
> called the cops. They came, told him to go to
> bed, and confiscated the gun pieces as 'evidence'.
> Nothing happened to me.

That is a lovely story and you tell it so well, with such enthusiasm!

The only way to control guns is to control violent crimes..

Good hard working people aren’t working to pay taxes and give up they shit they work for.

Democrats don’t protect the tax payers, to them, having a job is a privilege.

go get em now! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Anyone who votes for Trump proves that they are
> mentally disturbed and they can be disarmed under
> current laws.

That makes good sense.

https://youtu.be/p6tJPMv7nz4
Attachments:

How does OP plan on getting negros to comply with this. Thanx 2 libs, you can't arrest negro criminals b|c dass raysiss. Or like a typical libtardaciously libtarded libtardian, OP plans to let negro criminals keep their guns. This little program only applies 2 law abiding citizens.


Sorry 4 being redundant. I said negro "criminals".

Bill Brady Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Once the 2nd amendment is modified we will have to
> disarm the American population. First of all,
> federal or state laws would need to make it a
> crime punishable by a $1,000 fine and one year in
> prison per weapon to possess a firearm. The
> population would then be given three months to
> turn in their guns, without penalty.
>
> Hunters would be able to deposit their hunting
> weapons in a centrally located arsenal, heavily
> guarded, from which they would be able to withdraw
> them each hunting season upon presentation of a
> valid hunting license. The weapons would be
> required to be redeposited at the end of the
> season on pain of arrest. When hunters submitted
> their request for their weapons, federal, state
> and local checks would be made to establish that
> they had not been convicted of a violent crime
> since the last time they withdrew their weapons.
> In the process, arsenal staff would take at least
> a quick look at each hunter to try to affirm that
> he was not obviously unhinged.
>
> It would have to be the case that the term
> "hunting weapon" did not include anti-tank
> ordnance, assault weapons, rocket-propelled
> grenade launchers or other weapons of war.
>
> All antique or interesting nonhunting weapons
> would be required to be delivered to a local or
> regional museum, also to be under strict
> 24-hour-a-day guard. There they would be on
> display, if the owner desired, as part of an
> interesting exhibit of antique American weapons,
> as family heirlooms from proud wars past or as
> part of collections.
>
> Gun dealers could continue their work, selling
> hunting and antique firearms. Dealers would be
> required to maintain very tight inventories. Any
> gun sold would be delivered immediately by the
> dealer to the nearest arsenal or the museum, not
> to the buyer.
>
> The disarmament process would begin after the
> initial three-month amnesty. Special squads of
> police would be formed and trained to carry out
> the work. Then, on a random basis to permit no
> advance warning, city blocks and stretches of
> suburban and rural areas would be cordoned off and
> searches carried out in every business, dwelling
> and empty building. Thoroughness would be at the
> level of the sort of search that is carried out in
> Crime Scene Investigations. All firearms would be
> seized. The owners of weapons found in the
> searches would be prosecuted: $1,000 and one year
> in prison for each firearm.
>
> Clearly, since such sweeps could not take place
> all across a city, county, state or the country at
> the same time, guns would move. But fairly quickly
> there would begin to be gun-swept, gun-free areas
> where there should be no firearms. If there were,
> those carrying them would be subject to quick
> confiscation and prosecution. On the streets it
> would be a question of stopping and searching
> anyone, even Grandma with her walker, with the
> same penalties for "carrying."


Makes good sense.

go get em now! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Anyone who votes for Trump proves that they are
> mentally disturbed and they can be disarmed under
> current laws.

Good deal.