Re: Are liberals really as simple minded as they come across?
Posted by:
Your made up psychobabble bores
()
Date: February 22, 2018 07:08PM
History in context Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Cranky Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > PC Warrior Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Liberals feel, they don't reason. This is
> > > actually true and has been proven by studies.
>
> > > They're very emotional. Just look at Gerry.
> > That
> > > fuckstick rages and pouts more than anyone
> else
> > on
> > > here. He's just being a liberal. He can't
> > help
> > > it. Too much estrogen.
> >
> >
> > Nailed it.
>
> Actually, by making that claim, you are proving
> people who think and communicate like you can only
> see things in black and white, and cannot
> recognize or comprehend the world is actually not
> the way you or they perceive it. Further,
> labeling, by using the word "liberal" as a blanket
> subject, only compounds the conclusion of the
> writer's shallow thought processes.
>
> Now, let's look at actual data.
>
> Analyses from large representative samples (over
> 2,000 each and a twenty year study), from both the
> United States and the United Kingdom, confirm this
> postulate turned conclusion:
>
> Liberals are more intelligent, by a not so small
> factor.
>
> In both countries, more intelligent children are
> more likely to grow up to be liberals (Liberal,
> meaning; willing to part from resources to benefit
> people that are not related or alike),than less
> intelligent children. For example, among the
> American sample, those who identify themselves as
> “very liberal” in early adulthood had a mean
> childhood IQ of 106.4. Whereas those who
> identify themselves as “very conservative” in
> early adulthood had a mean childhood IQ of 94.8.
>
> To further blast the "conservative complaint board
> mantra," Conservatives often complain liberals
> control the media, show business, the academia,
> and other social institutions. Their Hypothesis
> actually explains why they are correct in their
> complaints of this unbalance.
>
> Look around, liberals do control the media, show
> business,and academia, (among other institutions),
> because, apart from a few areas in life (such as
> business) where countervailing circumstances may
> prevail, liberals control all institutions where
> talent and knowledge are required for step-by-step
> success. In other words, liberals control these
> institutions because liberals are on average more
> intelligent than conservatives in these fields,
> and thus they are more likely to attain the
> highest status in most areas of (referencing the
> "the evolutionarily novel") modern public life.
>
> I am not going to get into the Evolutionary Novel,
> because, though I agree with its outcomes, I am
> hedgy on the modern day classifications of those
> outcomes in its conclusion. Fair enough?
>
> That being said, let's do an exercise in your
> head. Think of the true conservatives in
> Hollywood. Do they match up evenly, skill wise,
> with their "liberal" counterparts? They really
> don't. Examples include Alec vs Stephen, Kelsey
> vs. David, and Clint vs. Kevin. Or, on a comedic
> note, Dennis Miller vs. Tina Fey. No contest-the
> liberals have better, smarter, and more versatile,
> skills.
>
>
> I am beginning to like this board I found. Any
> other issues that need to be answered?
You are one boring motherfucker. Just thought you'd like to know that.