With billions of cubic miles above, how could humans change it ?
Attachments:

The universal question Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> With billions of cubic miles above, how could
> humans change it ?

Just burn off the world's nuclear reactors into the air, see how well that goes for the next 200,000 years. Pump that plutonium, uranium, and all their isotopes and byproducts into the atmosphere.

there's way more factors than the globular warmists like to admit. volcanoes, water vapor, the sun, plate tectonics, oceanic carbon absorption, etc. bottom line is the climate has always changed since the earth formed and it's never going to stop. people who let politicians tell them "vote for me, I can control the weather" are fucking idiots. but imagine if a person could actually deliver on that promise. fucking with the weather sound like a good plan? I'm sure that person would know exactly which temperature is the "correct one" and there would be no unintended consequences, right? now imagine multiple countries having that power. they don't all want the same temps, that's a guarantee. that would be the beginning of the climate wars. but its a moot point since politicians who say stuff like that are completely full of shit. the best thing for man peoplekind is to get warmer. so hopefully that happens. warm periods in history are times of humans thriving. cold periods are tough times and people starve. funniest thing about the warmists is how these lying politicians have convinced them to fret over rich people losing their ocean front property. tell ya what, anyone who dies from rising sea levels is the darwin award champion of the millennium.

small atoms Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The universal question Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > With billions of cubic miles above, how could
> > humans change it ?
>
> Just burn off the world's nuclear reactors into
> the air, see how well that goes for the next
> 200,000 years. Pump that plutonium, uranium, and
> all their isotopes and byproducts into the
> atmosphere.


it would REALLY suck for about .1% of the land mass, that's for sure!

OP must be queer to want to live in a sardine can.

chernyobl Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> it would REALLY suck for about .1% of the land
> mass, that's for sure!


Toxicity of plutonium and uranium is measured in millionth's of a gram. Not because of it's terrible explosive power. Mainly because it just kills you.

And we've concentrated enough of it out of the ground to just, well, kill almost everybody.

Chernyobl was just an example of how a tiny amount of this stuff can wreak total havoc. There's still a hunk of that melted core sitting over there, and it won't be safe for humans to get near for 100,000 years. And that long-term danger's just from the radiation, not the immediate death you'd experience from breathing it in or ingesting it. It's nasty nasty stuff.

you hit the nail almost square on the head there

fitment is a problem

so we have: Material, organization, (energy), (fitment)

But the fitment problem is farms and mines and fishing you have to sprawl out to to access. you can't be all in one small spot or you can't REACH anything you need and the city would QUICKLY DIE.

what your showing is a DEAD CITY

show us an example of a live city, then i'll start reading your rant

OP the answer is it can't. For whatever it's worth the great lakes are covered by 5X the amount of ice they were covered by a year ago.

If only Al Gore could've taxed the dinosaurs for co2 they'd still be around today.

LOL!
LIBTARDS!