Off-Topic :
Fairfax Underground
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Should we use socialism to help Florida, Texas, and Louisiana?
Posted by:
covfefe
()
Date: September 10, 2017 11:04AM
Will the alt-right want us to use socialism to help them after the hurricanes? I mean we shouldn't impose on their freedom of the open markets to solve these problems.
Discuss.
My signature: Remember the last time Trumptards tried to give us advice about politics then ended up storming the capitol and tried to overthrow our government? Yeah, no thanks morons.
Discuss.
My signature: Remember the last time Trumptards tried to give us advice about politics then ended up storming the capitol and tried to overthrow our government? Yeah, no thanks morons.
Re: Should we use socialism to help Florida, Texas, and Louisiana?
Posted by:
Why are you so stupid? Discuss.
()
Date: September 10, 2017 11:08AM
covfefe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Will the alt-right want us to use socialism to
> help them after the hurricanes? I mean we
> shouldn't impose on their freedom of the open
> markets to solve these problems.
>
> Discuss.
Socialism =/= government
You = retarded faggot
-------------------------------------------------------
> Will the alt-right want us to use socialism to
> help them after the hurricanes? I mean we
> shouldn't impose on their freedom of the open
> markets to solve these problems.
>
> Discuss.
Socialism =/= government
You = retarded faggot
Re: Should we use socialism to help Florida, Texas, and Louisiana?
Posted by:
SouthNetTakers
()
Date: September 10, 2017 11:15AM
Southern Whites LOVE taking more Federal money than they give - the Cities and North are their Sugar Daddies. They hate seeing people of color get the money though. They are too amoral and stupid to notice the hypocrisy.
Re: Should we use socialism to help Florida, Texas, and Louisiana?
Posted by:
covfefe
()
Date: September 10, 2017 11:43AM
Why are you so stupid? Discuss. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> covfefe Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Will the alt-right want us to use socialism to
> > help them after the hurricanes? I mean we
> > shouldn't impose on their freedom of the open
> > markets to solve these problems.
> >
> > Discuss.
>
>
> Socialism =/= government
> You = retarded faggot
I thought you morons didn't like government intervention in free markets. Does that all change when you dolts need help?
LOL Trumptardz!
My signature: Remember the last time Trumptards tried to give us advice about politics then ended up storming the capitol and tried to overthrow our government? Yeah, no thanks morons.
-------------------------------------------------------
> covfefe Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Will the alt-right want us to use socialism to
> > help them after the hurricanes? I mean we
> > shouldn't impose on their freedom of the open
> > markets to solve these problems.
> >
> > Discuss.
>
>
> Socialism =/= government
> You = retarded faggot
I thought you morons didn't like government intervention in free markets. Does that all change when you dolts need help?
LOL Trumptardz!
My signature: Remember the last time Trumptards tried to give us advice about politics then ended up storming the capitol and tried to overthrow our government? Yeah, no thanks morons.
Re: Should we use socialism to help Florida, Texas, and Louisiana?
Posted by:
Goatfuckerer2
()
Date: September 10, 2017 11:58AM
Why does Ravi have no job/life and posts on FFXU 24/7?
Discuss.
Discuss.
Re: Should we use socialism to help Florida, Texas, and Louisiana?
Posted by:
KKKillary KKKlinton
()
Date: September 10, 2017 12:01PM
Another Gerry fail thread. Lol!
Re: Should we use socialism to help Florida, Texas, and Louisiana?
Posted by:
Gunlover
()
Date: September 10, 2017 12:03PM
Kneegrow you need to read what socialism is, instead of just throwing out words. I let you kneegrow go to school and you come out a dumber kneegrow.
Re: Should we use socialism to help Florida, Texas, and Louisiana?
Posted by:
py9nm
()
Date: September 10, 2017 03:49PM
Republican states YES, Democrat states NO
part of undoing obama's 9 trillion inflation which rested almost wholey on Republicans
part of undoing obama's 9 trillion inflation which rested almost wholey on Republicans
Re: Should we use socialism to help Florida, Texas, and Louisiana?
Posted by:
Doh!
()
Date: September 10, 2017 03:56PM
Federal tax revenue by state
Rank State Gross collections (in thousands)[2] Revenue per capita (est.) Ratio to GSP
1 California $405,851,295 $10,408 16.6%
2 Texas $279,904,425 $10,204 17.1%
3 New York $269,716,999 $13,659 18.5%
4 Florida $177,389,488 $8,762 19.9%
Rank State Gross collections (in thousands)[2] Revenue per capita (est.) Ratio to GSP
1 California $405,851,295 $10,408 16.6%
2 Texas $279,904,425 $10,204 17.1%
3 New York $269,716,999 $13,659 18.5%
4 Florida $177,389,488 $8,762 19.9%
Re: Should we use socialism to help Florida, Texas, and Louisiana?
Posted by:
WYB36
()
Date: September 10, 2017 03:57PM
covfefe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Will the alt-right want us to use socialism to
> help them after the hurricanes? I mean we
> shouldn't impose on their freedom of the open
> markets to solve these problems.
>
> Discuss.
Insurance, donations and private organizations aren't socialism. You don't need to participate in these.
The government will spend money to restore infrastructure. That is the job of government.
FEMA is your only argument here. I am sure we can agree FEMA does a wonderful job.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Will the alt-right want us to use socialism to
> help them after the hurricanes? I mean we
> shouldn't impose on their freedom of the open
> markets to solve these problems.
>
> Discuss.
Insurance, donations and private organizations aren't socialism. You don't need to participate in these.
The government will spend money to restore infrastructure. That is the job of government.
FEMA is your only argument here. I am sure we can agree FEMA does a wonderful job.
Re: Should we use socialism to help Florida, Texas, and Louisiana?
Posted by:
covfefe
()
Date: September 10, 2017 04:37PM
Doh! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Federal tax revenue by state
>
> Rank State Gross collections (in
> thousands)[2] Revenue per capita (est.) Ratio to
> GSP
> 1 California $405,851,295 $10,408 16.6%
> 2 Texas $279,904,425 $10,204 17.1%
> 3 New York $269,716,999 $13,659 18.5%
> 4 Florida $177,389,488 $8,762 19.9%
Tx is getting 15B in aid from the fedz. so they put in 300M and get out 15B. helluva a deal...
My signature: Remember the last time Trumptards tried to give us advice about politics then ended up storming the capitol and tried to overthrow our government? Yeah, no thanks morons.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Federal tax revenue by state
>
> Rank State Gross collections (in
> thousands)[2] Revenue per capita (est.) Ratio to
> GSP
> 1 California $405,851,295 $10,408 16.6%
> 2 Texas $279,904,425 $10,204 17.1%
> 3 New York $269,716,999 $13,659 18.5%
> 4 Florida $177,389,488 $8,762 19.9%
Tx is getting 15B in aid from the fedz. so they put in 300M and get out 15B. helluva a deal...
My signature: Remember the last time Trumptards tried to give us advice about politics then ended up storming the capitol and tried to overthrow our government? Yeah, no thanks morons.
Re: Should we use socialism to help Florida, Texas, and Louisiana?
Posted by:
covfefe
()
Date: September 10, 2017 04:39PM
WYB36 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> covfefe Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Will the alt-right want us to use socialism to
> > help them after the hurricanes? I mean we
> > shouldn't impose on their freedom of the open
> > markets to solve these problems.
> >
> > Discuss.
>
> Insurance, donations and private organizations
> aren't socialism. You don't need to participate
> in these.
>
> The government will spend money to restore
> infrastructure. That is the job of government.
>
> FEMA is your only argument here. I am sure we can
> agree FEMA does a wonderful job.
The role of the gov't is debatable but rightards seem to prefer that they get out of the way and let the private sector handle it... at least, until they need help. which is my point.
My signature: Remember the last time Trumptards tried to give us advice about politics then ended up storming the capitol and tried to overthrow our government? Yeah, no thanks morons.
-------------------------------------------------------
> covfefe Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Will the alt-right want us to use socialism to
> > help them after the hurricanes? I mean we
> > shouldn't impose on their freedom of the open
> > markets to solve these problems.
> >
> > Discuss.
>
> Insurance, donations and private organizations
> aren't socialism. You don't need to participate
> in these.
>
> The government will spend money to restore
> infrastructure. That is the job of government.
>
> FEMA is your only argument here. I am sure we can
> agree FEMA does a wonderful job.
The role of the gov't is debatable but rightards seem to prefer that they get out of the way and let the private sector handle it... at least, until they need help. which is my point.
My signature: Remember the last time Trumptards tried to give us advice about politics then ended up storming the capitol and tried to overthrow our government? Yeah, no thanks morons.
Re: Should we use socialism to help Florida, Texas, and Louisiana?
Posted by:
Tiny little baby covfefe crying
()
Date: September 10, 2017 04:53PM
covfefe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Why are you so stupid? Discuss. Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > covfefe Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Will the alt-right want us to use socialism
> to
> > > help them after the hurricanes? I mean we
> > > shouldn't impose on their freedom of the open
> > > markets to solve these problems.
> > >
> > > Discuss.
> >
> >
> > Socialism =/= government
> > You = retarded faggot
>
> I thought
No you didn't. You aren't capable of thought. All you have is emotion. Like a tiny, little baby. Stop lying.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Why are you so stupid? Discuss. Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > covfefe Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Will the alt-right want us to use socialism
> to
> > > help them after the hurricanes? I mean we
> > > shouldn't impose on their freedom of the open
> > > markets to solve these problems.
> > >
> > > Discuss.
> >
> >
> > Socialism =/= government
> > You = retarded faggot
>
> I thought
No you didn't. You aren't capable of thought. All you have is emotion. Like a tiny, little baby. Stop lying.
Re: Should we use socialism to help Florida, Texas, and Louisiana?
Posted by:
Brain Fart
()
Date: September 10, 2017 05:02PM
covfefe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Doh! Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Federal tax revenue by state
> >
> > Rank State Gross collections (in
> > thousands)[2] Revenue per capita (est.) Ratio
> to
> > GSP
> > 1 California $405,851,295 $10,408 16.6%
> > 2 Texas $279,904,425 $10,204 17.1%
> > 3 New York $269,716,999 $13,659 18.5%
> > 4 Florida $177,389,488 $8,762 19.9%
>
>
> Tx is getting 15B in aid from the fedz. so they
> put in 300M and get out 15B. helluva a deal...
You ARE fucking retarded.
Gross collections (in thousands)
Do you know what that means?
-------------------------------------------------------
> Doh! Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Federal tax revenue by state
> >
> > Rank State Gross collections (in
> > thousands)[2] Revenue per capita (est.) Ratio
> to
> > GSP
> > 1 California $405,851,295 $10,408 16.6%
> > 2 Texas $279,904,425 $10,204 17.1%
> > 3 New York $269,716,999 $13,659 18.5%
> > 4 Florida $177,389,488 $8,762 19.9%
>
>
> Tx is getting 15B in aid from the fedz. so they
> put in 300M and get out 15B. helluva a deal...
You ARE fucking retarded.
Gross collections (in thousands)
Do you know what that means?
Re: Should we use socialism to help Florida, Texas, and Louisiana?
Posted by:
covfefe
()
Date: September 10, 2017 05:04PM
Brain Fart Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> covfefe Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Doh! Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Federal tax revenue by state
> > >
> > > Rank State Gross collections (in
> > > thousands)[2] Revenue per capita (est.) Ratio
> > to
> > > GSP
> > > 1 California $405,851,295 $10,408 16.6%
> > > 2 Texas $279,904,425 $10,204 17.1%
> > > 3 New York $269,716,999 $13,659 18.5%
> > > 4 Florida $177,389,488 $8,762 19.9%
> >
> >
> > Tx is getting 15B in aid from the fedz. so
> they
> > put in 300M and get out 15B. helluva a deal...
>
>
> You ARE fucking retarded.
>
> Gross collections (in thousands)
>
> Do you know what that means?
So why just not state the full number?
My signature: Remember the last time Trumptards tried to give us advice about politics then ended up storming the capitol and tried to overthrow our government? Yeah, no thanks morons.
-------------------------------------------------------
> covfefe Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Doh! Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Federal tax revenue by state
> > >
> > > Rank State Gross collections (in
> > > thousands)[2] Revenue per capita (est.) Ratio
> > to
> > > GSP
> > > 1 California $405,851,295 $10,408 16.6%
> > > 2 Texas $279,904,425 $10,204 17.1%
> > > 3 New York $269,716,999 $13,659 18.5%
> > > 4 Florida $177,389,488 $8,762 19.9%
> >
> >
> > Tx is getting 15B in aid from the fedz. so
> they
> > put in 300M and get out 15B. helluva a deal...
>
>
> You ARE fucking retarded.
>
> Gross collections (in thousands)
>
> Do you know what that means?
So why just not state the full number?
My signature: Remember the last time Trumptards tried to give us advice about politics then ended up storming the capitol and tried to overthrow our government? Yeah, no thanks morons.
Re: Should we use socialism to help Florida, Texas, and Louisiana?
Posted by:
Don't mess with TX
()
Date: September 10, 2017 05:09PM
covfefe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Doh! Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Federal tax revenue by state
> >
> > Rank State Gross collections (in
> > thousands)[2] Revenue per capita (est.) Ratio
> to
> > GSP
> > 1 California $405,851,295 $10,408 16.6%
> > 2 Texas $279,904,425 $10,204 17.1%
> > 3 New York $269,716,999 $13,659 18.5%
> > 4 Florida $177,389,488 $8,762 19.9%
>
>
> Tx is getting 15B in aid from the fedz. so they
> put in 300M and get out 15B. helluva a deal...
That's only one year and only considering federal income taxes not all other taxes and other economic contributions with a $1.6 trillion GDP.
Let's shut down oil and gas production/refining out of TX for a month and see how that affects things for the 'fedz.' lol Then maybe DFW and American and United's major hubs, Lockeed's plant making F-16s, F-22, and the F-35, Dell, HP, TI...
-------------------------------------------------------
> Doh! Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Federal tax revenue by state
> >
> > Rank State Gross collections (in
> > thousands)[2] Revenue per capita (est.) Ratio
> to
> > GSP
> > 1 California $405,851,295 $10,408 16.6%
> > 2 Texas $279,904,425 $10,204 17.1%
> > 3 New York $269,716,999 $13,659 18.5%
> > 4 Florida $177,389,488 $8,762 19.9%
>
>
> Tx is getting 15B in aid from the fedz. so they
> put in 300M and get out 15B. helluva a deal...
That's only one year and only considering federal income taxes not all other taxes and other economic contributions with a $1.6 trillion GDP.
Let's shut down oil and gas production/refining out of TX for a month and see how that affects things for the 'fedz.' lol Then maybe DFW and American and United's major hubs, Lockeed's plant making F-16s, F-22, and the F-35, Dell, HP, TI...
Re: Should we use socialism to help Florida, Texas, and Louisiana?
Posted by:
covtardeded
()
Date: September 10, 2017 05:11PM
covfefe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Brain Fart Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > covfefe Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Doh! Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > Federal tax revenue by state
> > > >
> > > > Rank State Gross collections (in
> > > > thousands)[2] Revenue per capita
> (est.) Ratio
> > > to
> > > > GSP
> > > > 1 California $405,851,295 $10,408 16.6%
> > > > 2 Texas $279,904,425 $10,204 17.1%
> > > > 3 New York $269,716,999 $13,659 18.5%
> > > > 4 Florida $177,389,488 $8,762 19.9%
> > >
> > >
> > > Tx is getting 15B in aid from the fedz. so
> > they
> > > put in 300M and get out 15B. helluva a
> deal...
> >
> >
> > You ARE fucking retarded.
> >
> > Gross collections (in thousands)
> >
> > Do you know what that means?
>
>
> So why just not state the full number?
You could have just answered "Yes."
-------------------------------------------------------
> Brain Fart Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > covfefe Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Doh! Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > Federal tax revenue by state
> > > >
> > > > Rank State Gross collections (in
> > > > thousands)[2] Revenue per capita
> (est.) Ratio
> > > to
> > > > GSP
> > > > 1 California $405,851,295 $10,408 16.6%
> > > > 2 Texas $279,904,425 $10,204 17.1%
> > > > 3 New York $269,716,999 $13,659 18.5%
> > > > 4 Florida $177,389,488 $8,762 19.9%
> > >
> > >
> > > Tx is getting 15B in aid from the fedz. so
> > they
> > > put in 300M and get out 15B. helluva a
> deal...
> >
> >
> > You ARE fucking retarded.
> >
> > Gross collections (in thousands)
> >
> > Do you know what that means?
>
>
> So why just not state the full number?
You could have just answered "Yes."
Re: Should we use socialism to help Florida, Texas, and Louisiana?
Posted by:
Brain Fart
()
Date: September 10, 2017 06:09PM
covfefe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Brain Fart Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > covfefe Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Doh! Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > Federal tax revenue by state
> > > >
> > > > Rank State Gross collections (in
> > > > thousands)[2] Revenue per capita
> (est.) Ratio
> > > to
> > > > GSP
> > > > 1 California $405,851,295 $10,408 16.6%
> > > > 2 Texas $279,904,425 $10,204 17.1%
> > > > 3 New York $269,716,999 $13,659 18.5%
> > > > 4 Florida $177,389,488 $8,762 19.9%
> > >
> > >
> > > Tx is getting 15B in aid from the fedz. so
> > they
> > > put in 300M and get out 15B. helluva a
> deal...
> >
> >
> > You ARE fucking retarded.
> >
> > Gross collections (in thousands)
> >
> > Do you know what that means?
>
>
> So why just not state the full number?
This is be of those situations where you put your stupidity on full display.
Presenting the numbers "in thousands" allows someone to present cleaner numbers and avoid inundating the audience with overlarge numbers. This is done in financial statements routinely. So routinely, in fact, that the fact you didn't recognize it and have to ask that question is a tell tale sign of just how uninformed you are about things. It is also used in other data sets that present large numbers, such as population numbers.
I have to ask, given the fact that you just out your stupidity on full display for all to see, do you think your in any position to call someone a tard, tard?
-------------------------------------------------------
> Brain Fart Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > covfefe Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Doh! Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > Federal tax revenue by state
> > > >
> > > > Rank State Gross collections (in
> > > > thousands)[2] Revenue per capita
> (est.) Ratio
> > > to
> > > > GSP
> > > > 1 California $405,851,295 $10,408 16.6%
> > > > 2 Texas $279,904,425 $10,204 17.1%
> > > > 3 New York $269,716,999 $13,659 18.5%
> > > > 4 Florida $177,389,488 $8,762 19.9%
> > >
> > >
> > > Tx is getting 15B in aid from the fedz. so
> > they
> > > put in 300M and get out 15B. helluva a
> deal...
> >
> >
> > You ARE fucking retarded.
> >
> > Gross collections (in thousands)
> >
> > Do you know what that means?
>
>
> So why just not state the full number?
This is be of those situations where you put your stupidity on full display.
Presenting the numbers "in thousands" allows someone to present cleaner numbers and avoid inundating the audience with overlarge numbers. This is done in financial statements routinely. So routinely, in fact, that the fact you didn't recognize it and have to ask that question is a tell tale sign of just how uninformed you are about things. It is also used in other data sets that present large numbers, such as population numbers.
I have to ask, given the fact that you just out your stupidity on full display for all to see, do you think your in any position to call someone a tard, tard?
Re: Should we use socialism to help Florida, Texas, and Louisiana?
Posted by:
covfefe is.....
()
Date: September 10, 2017 06:35PM
....running out of ideas.
Re: Should we use socialism to help Florida, Texas, and Louisiana?
Posted by:
covfefe
()
Date: September 10, 2017 06:54PM
Brain Fart Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> covfefe Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Brain Fart Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > covfefe Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > Doh! Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > Federal tax revenue by state
> > > > >
> > > > > Rank State Gross collections (in
> > > > > thousands)[2] Revenue per capita
> > (est.) Ratio
> > > > to
> > > > > GSP
> > > > > 1 California $405,851,295 $10,408 16.6%
> > > > > 2 Texas $279,904,425 $10,204 17.1%
> > > > > 3 New York $269,716,999 $13,659 18.5%
> > > > > 4 Florida $177,389,488 $8,762 19.9%
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Tx is getting 15B in aid from the fedz. so
> > > they
> > > > put in 300M and get out 15B. helluva a
> > deal...
> > >
> > >
> > > You ARE fucking retarded.
> > >
> > > Gross collections (in thousands)
> > >
> > > Do you know what that means?
> >
> >
> > So why just not state the full number?
>
>
> This is be of those situations where you put your
> stupidity on full display.
>
> Presenting the numbers "in thousands" allows
> someone to present cleaner numbers and avoid
> inundating the audience with overlarge numbers.
> This is done in financial statements routinely. So
> routinely, in fact, that the fact you didn't
> recognize it and have to ask that question is a
> tell tale sign of just how uninformed you are
> about things. It is also used in other data sets
> that present large numbers, such as population
> numbers.
>
> I have to ask, given the fact that you just out
> your stupidity on full display for all to see, do
> you think your in any position to call someone a
> tard, tard?
Yeah you're right. saying: $279,904,425 (represented in 1000's) is much easier to read then 280B. go fuck yourself idiot.
My signature: Remember the last time Trumptards tried to give us advice about politics then ended up storming the capitol and tried to overthrow our government? Yeah, no thanks morons.
-------------------------------------------------------
> covfefe Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Brain Fart Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > covfefe Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > Doh! Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > Federal tax revenue by state
> > > > >
> > > > > Rank State Gross collections (in
> > > > > thousands)[2] Revenue per capita
> > (est.) Ratio
> > > > to
> > > > > GSP
> > > > > 1 California $405,851,295 $10,408 16.6%
> > > > > 2 Texas $279,904,425 $10,204 17.1%
> > > > > 3 New York $269,716,999 $13,659 18.5%
> > > > > 4 Florida $177,389,488 $8,762 19.9%
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Tx is getting 15B in aid from the fedz. so
> > > they
> > > > put in 300M and get out 15B. helluva a
> > deal...
> > >
> > >
> > > You ARE fucking retarded.
> > >
> > > Gross collections (in thousands)
> > >
> > > Do you know what that means?
> >
> >
> > So why just not state the full number?
>
>
> This is be of those situations where you put your
> stupidity on full display.
>
> Presenting the numbers "in thousands" allows
> someone to present cleaner numbers and avoid
> inundating the audience with overlarge numbers.
> This is done in financial statements routinely. So
> routinely, in fact, that the fact you didn't
> recognize it and have to ask that question is a
> tell tale sign of just how uninformed you are
> about things. It is also used in other data sets
> that present large numbers, such as population
> numbers.
>
> I have to ask, given the fact that you just out
> your stupidity on full display for all to see, do
> you think your in any position to call someone a
> tard, tard?
Yeah you're right. saying: $279,904,425 (represented in 1000's) is much easier to read then 280B. go fuck yourself idiot.
My signature: Remember the last time Trumptards tried to give us advice about politics then ended up storming the capitol and tried to overthrow our government? Yeah, no thanks morons.
Re: Should we use socialism to help Florida, Texas, and Louisiana?
Posted by:
MoveOn!
()
Date: September 10, 2017 07:14PM
covfefe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> Yeah you're right. saying: $279,904,425
> (represented in 1000's) is much easier to read
> then 280B. go fuck yourself idiot.
You fucked up and you look like an idiot.
Move on.
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> Yeah you're right. saying: $279,904,425
> (represented in 1000's) is much easier to read
> then 280B. go fuck yourself idiot.
You fucked up and you look like an idiot.
Move on.
Re: Should we use socialism to help Florida, Texas, and Louisiana?
Posted by:
Nurse Retchid
()
Date: September 10, 2017 07:19PM
covfefe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Will the alt-right want us to use socialism to
> help them after the hurricanes? I mean we
> shouldn't impose on their freedom of the open
> markets to solve these problems.
>
> Discuss.
We should use socialism to put you in a mental institution where you can get the help you need.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Will the alt-right want us to use socialism to
> help them after the hurricanes? I mean we
> shouldn't impose on their freedom of the open
> markets to solve these problems.
>
> Discuss.
We should use socialism to put you in a mental institution where you can get the help you need.
Re: Should we use socialism to help Florida, Texas, and Louisiana?
Posted by:
Brain Fart
()
Date: September 10, 2017 07:55PM
covfefe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Brain Fart Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > covfefe Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Brain Fart Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > covfefe Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > Doh! Wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----
> > > > > > Federal tax revenue by state
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Rank State Gross collections (in
> > > > > > thousands)[2] Revenue per capita
> > > (est.) Ratio
> > > > > to
> > > > > > GSP
> > > > > > 1 California $405,851,295 $10,408 16.6%
> > > > > > 2 Texas $279,904,425 $10,204 17.1%
> > > > > > 3 New York $269,716,999 $13,659 18.5%
> > > > > > 4 Florida $177,389,488 $8,762 19.9%
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Tx is getting 15B in aid from the fedz.
> so
> > > > they
> > > > > put in 300M and get out 15B. helluva a
> > > deal...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > You ARE fucking retarded.
> > > >
> > > > Gross collections (in thousands)
> > > >
> > > > Do you know what that means?
> > >
> > >
> > > So why just not state the full number?
> >
> >
> > This is be of those situations where you put
> your
> > stupidity on full display.
> >
> > Presenting the numbers "in thousands" allows
> > someone to present cleaner numbers and avoid
> > inundating the audience with overlarge numbers.
>
> > This is done in financial statements routinely.
> So
> > routinely, in fact, that the fact you didn't
> > recognize it and have to ask that question is a
> > tell tale sign of just how uninformed you are
> > about things. It is also used in other data
> sets
> > that present large numbers, such as population
> > numbers.
> >
> > I have to ask, given the fact that you just out
> > your stupidity on full display for all to see,
> do
> > you think your in any position to call someone
> a
> > tard, tard?
>
>
> Yeah you're right. saying: $279,904,425
> (represented in 1000's) is much easier to read
> then 280B. go fuck yourself idiot.
Dude, I'm not the one that came up with using the term "in thousands" when presenting numbers. It's a long established a widely used method. The fact that you've never noticed it and didn't recognize it indicates you're an uneducated buffoon.
You keep putting your stupidity on display when you make your arguments. You really are stupid. This is low level shit that most middle schoolers have picked up on by now.
To answer the question given you, as a tard, you are in no position to pass judgement on anyone else's intelligence.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Brain Fart Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > covfefe Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Brain Fart Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > covfefe Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > Doh! Wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----
> > > > > > Federal tax revenue by state
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Rank State Gross collections (in
> > > > > > thousands)[2] Revenue per capita
> > > (est.) Ratio
> > > > > to
> > > > > > GSP
> > > > > > 1 California $405,851,295 $10,408 16.6%
> > > > > > 2 Texas $279,904,425 $10,204 17.1%
> > > > > > 3 New York $269,716,999 $13,659 18.5%
> > > > > > 4 Florida $177,389,488 $8,762 19.9%
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Tx is getting 15B in aid from the fedz.
> so
> > > > they
> > > > > put in 300M and get out 15B. helluva a
> > > deal...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > You ARE fucking retarded.
> > > >
> > > > Gross collections (in thousands)
> > > >
> > > > Do you know what that means?
> > >
> > >
> > > So why just not state the full number?
> >
> >
> > This is be of those situations where you put
> your
> > stupidity on full display.
> >
> > Presenting the numbers "in thousands" allows
> > someone to present cleaner numbers and avoid
> > inundating the audience with overlarge numbers.
>
> > This is done in financial statements routinely.
> So
> > routinely, in fact, that the fact you didn't
> > recognize it and have to ask that question is a
> > tell tale sign of just how uninformed you are
> > about things. It is also used in other data
> sets
> > that present large numbers, such as population
> > numbers.
> >
> > I have to ask, given the fact that you just out
> > your stupidity on full display for all to see,
> do
> > you think your in any position to call someone
> a
> > tard, tard?
>
>
> Yeah you're right. saying: $279,904,425
> (represented in 1000's) is much easier to read
> then 280B. go fuck yourself idiot.
Dude, I'm not the one that came up with using the term "in thousands" when presenting numbers. It's a long established a widely used method. The fact that you've never noticed it and didn't recognize it indicates you're an uneducated buffoon.
You keep putting your stupidity on display when you make your arguments. You really are stupid. This is low level shit that most middle schoolers have picked up on by now.
To answer the question given you, as a tard, you are in no position to pass judgement on anyone else's intelligence.
Re: Should we use socialism to help Florida, Texas, and Louisiana?
Posted by:
covfefe
()
Date: September 10, 2017 08:24PM
Brain Fart Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> covfefe Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Brain Fart Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > covfefe Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > Brain Fart Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > covfefe Wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----
> > > > > > Doh! Wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----
> > > > > > > Federal tax revenue by state
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Rank State Gross collections (in
> > > > > > > thousands)[2] Revenue per capita
> > > > (est.) Ratio
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > > GSP
> > > > > > >
> 1 California $405,851,295 $10,408 16.6%
> > > > > > > 2 Texas $279,904,425 $10,204 17.1%
> > > > > > > 3 New York $269,716,999 $13,659 18.5%
> > > > > > > 4 Florida $177,389,488 $8,762 19.9%
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Tx is getting 15B in aid from the fedz.
>
> > so
> > > > > they
> > > > > > put in 300M and get out 15B. helluva a
> > > > deal...
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > You ARE fucking retarded.
> > > > >
> > > > > Gross collections (in thousands)
> > > > >
> > > > > Do you know what that means?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > So why just not state the full number?
> > >
> > >
> > > This is be of those situations where you put
> > your
> > > stupidity on full display.
> > >
> > > Presenting the numbers "in thousands" allows
> > > someone to present cleaner numbers and avoid
> > > inundating the audience with overlarge
> numbers.
> >
> > > This is done in financial statements
> routinely.
> > So
> > > routinely, in fact, that the fact you didn't
> > > recognize it and have to ask that question is
> a
> > > tell tale sign of just how uninformed you are
> > > about things. It is also used in other data
> > sets
> > > that present large numbers, such as
> population
> > > numbers.
> > >
> > > I have to ask, given the fact that you just
> out
> > > your stupidity on full display for all to
> see,
> > do
> > > you think your in any position to call
> someone
> > a
> > > tard, tard?
> >
> >
> > Yeah you're right. saying: $279,904,425
> > (represented in 1000's) is much easier to read
> > then 280B. go fuck yourself idiot.
>
>
> Dude, I'm not the one that came up with using the
> term "in thousands" when presenting numbers. It's
> a long established a widely used method. The fact
> that you've never noticed it and didn't recognize
> it indicates you're an uneducated buffoon.
>
> You keep putting your stupidity on display when
> you make your arguments. You really are stupid.
> This is low level shit that most middle schoolers
> have picked up on by now.
>
> To answer the question given you, as a tard, you
> are in no position to pass judgement on anyone
> else's intelligence.
Irrespective, $279,904,425 (represented in 1000's) is much harder to read
than 280B so state it as such next time. Think monkey, think.
My signature: Remember the last time Trumptards tried to give us advice about politics then ended up storming the capitol and tried to overthrow our government? Yeah, no thanks morons.
-------------------------------------------------------
> covfefe Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Brain Fart Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > covfefe Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > Brain Fart Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > covfefe Wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----
> > > > > > Doh! Wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----
> > > > > > > Federal tax revenue by state
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Rank State Gross collections (in
> > > > > > > thousands)[2] Revenue per capita
> > > > (est.) Ratio
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > > GSP
> > > > > > >
> 1 California $405,851,295 $10,408 16.6%
> > > > > > > 2 Texas $279,904,425 $10,204 17.1%
> > > > > > > 3 New York $269,716,999 $13,659 18.5%
> > > > > > > 4 Florida $177,389,488 $8,762 19.9%
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Tx is getting 15B in aid from the fedz.
>
> > so
> > > > > they
> > > > > > put in 300M and get out 15B. helluva a
> > > > deal...
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > You ARE fucking retarded.
> > > > >
> > > > > Gross collections (in thousands)
> > > > >
> > > > > Do you know what that means?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > So why just not state the full number?
> > >
> > >
> > > This is be of those situations where you put
> > your
> > > stupidity on full display.
> > >
> > > Presenting the numbers "in thousands" allows
> > > someone to present cleaner numbers and avoid
> > > inundating the audience with overlarge
> numbers.
> >
> > > This is done in financial statements
> routinely.
> > So
> > > routinely, in fact, that the fact you didn't
> > > recognize it and have to ask that question is
> a
> > > tell tale sign of just how uninformed you are
> > > about things. It is also used in other data
> > sets
> > > that present large numbers, such as
> population
> > > numbers.
> > >
> > > I have to ask, given the fact that you just
> out
> > > your stupidity on full display for all to
> see,
> > do
> > > you think your in any position to call
> someone
> > a
> > > tard, tard?
> >
> >
> > Yeah you're right. saying: $279,904,425
> > (represented in 1000's) is much easier to read
> > then 280B. go fuck yourself idiot.
>
>
> Dude, I'm not the one that came up with using the
> term "in thousands" when presenting numbers. It's
> a long established a widely used method. The fact
> that you've never noticed it and didn't recognize
> it indicates you're an uneducated buffoon.
>
> You keep putting your stupidity on display when
> you make your arguments. You really are stupid.
> This is low level shit that most middle schoolers
> have picked up on by now.
>
> To answer the question given you, as a tard, you
> are in no position to pass judgement on anyone
> else's intelligence.
Irrespective, $279,904,425 (represented in 1000's) is much harder to read
than 280B so state it as such next time. Think monkey, think.
My signature: Remember the last time Trumptards tried to give us advice about politics then ended up storming the capitol and tried to overthrow our government? Yeah, no thanks morons.
Re: Should we use socialism to help Florida, Texas, and Louisiana?
Posted by:
covfefe translator
()
Date: September 10, 2017 08:28PM
covfefe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Brain Fart Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> > Dude, I'm not the one that came up with using
> the
> > term "in thousands" when presenting numbers.
> It's
> > a long established a widely used method. The
> fact
> > that you've never noticed it and didn't
> recognize
> > it indicates you're an uneducated buffoon.
> >
> > You keep putting your stupidity on display when
> > you make your arguments. You really are stupid.
> > This is low level shit that most middle
> schoolers
> > have picked up on by now.
> >
> > To answer the question given you, as a tard,
> you
> > are in no position to pass judgement on anyone
> > else's intelligence.
>
>Irrespective, $279,904,425 (represented in 1000's)
> is much harder to read
> than 280B so state it as such next time. Think
> monkey, think. Yes, I realize that I fucked up now
> but I have to come up with some way to try to defend
> my own stupidity.
^ FIFY
-------------------------------------------------------
> Brain Fart Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> > Dude, I'm not the one that came up with using
> the
> > term "in thousands" when presenting numbers.
> It's
> > a long established a widely used method. The
> fact
> > that you've never noticed it and didn't
> recognize
> > it indicates you're an uneducated buffoon.
> >
> > You keep putting your stupidity on display when
> > you make your arguments. You really are stupid.
> > This is low level shit that most middle
> schoolers
> > have picked up on by now.
> >
> > To answer the question given you, as a tard,
> you
> > are in no position to pass judgement on anyone
> > else's intelligence.
>
>
> is much harder to read
> than 280B so state it as such next time. Think
> monkey, think.
> but I have to come up with some way to try to defend
> my own stupidity.
^ FIFY
Re: Should we use socialism to help Florida, Texas, and Louisiana?
Posted by:
Brain Fart
()
Date: September 10, 2017 08:30PM
covfefe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Brain Fart Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > covfefe Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Brain Fart Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > covfefe Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > Brain Fart Wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----
> > > > > > covfefe Wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----
> > > > > > > Doh! Wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > -----
> > > > > > > > Federal tax revenue by state
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Rank State Gross collections (in
> > > > > > > > thousands)[2] Revenue per capita
> > > > > (est.) Ratio
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > GSP
> > > > > > > >
> > 1 California $405,851,295 $10,408 16.6%
> > > > > > > > 2 Texas $279,904,425 $10,204 17.1%
> > > > > > > > 3 New
> York $269,716,999 $13,659 18.5%
> > > > > > > > 4 Florida $177,389,488 $8,762 19.9%
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Tx is getting 15B in aid from the
> fedz.
> >
> > > so
> > > > > > they
> > > > > > > put in 300M and get out 15B. helluva
> a
> > > > > deal...
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You ARE fucking retarded.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Gross collections (in thousands)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Do you know what that means?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > So why just not state the full number?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > This is be of those situations where you
> put
> > > your
> > > > stupidity on full display.
> > > >
> > > > Presenting the numbers "in thousands"
> allows
> > > > someone to present cleaner numbers and
> avoid
> > > > inundating the audience with overlarge
> > numbers.
> > >
> > > > This is done in financial statements
> > routinely.
> > > So
> > > > routinely, in fact, that the fact you
> didn't
> > > > recognize it and have to ask that question
> is
> > a
> > > > tell tale sign of just how uninformed you
> are
> > > > about things. It is also used in other
> data
> > > sets
> > > > that present large numbers, such as
> > population
> > > > numbers.
> > > >
> > > > I have to ask, given the fact that you just
> > out
> > > > your stupidity on full display for all to
> > see,
> > > do
> > > > you think your in any position to call
> > someone
> > > a
> > > > tard, tard?
> > >
> > >
> > > Yeah you're right. saying: $279,904,425
> > > (represented in 1000's) is much easier to
> read
> > > then 280B. go fuck yourself idiot.
> >
> >
> > Dude, I'm not the one that came up with using
> the
> > term "in thousands" when presenting numbers.
> It's
> > a long established a widely used method. The
> fact
> > that you've never noticed it and didn't
> recognize
> > it indicates you're an uneducated buffoon.
> >
> > You keep putting your stupidity on display when
> > you make your arguments. You really are stupid.
> > This is low level shit that most middle
> schoolers
> > have picked up on by now.
> >
> > To answer the question given you, as a tard,
> you
> > are in no position to pass judgement on anyone
> > else's intelligence.
>
> Irrespective, $279,904,425 (represented in 1000's)
> is much harder to read
> than 280B so state it as such next time. Think
> monkey, think.
Dude, I didn't write the numbers. It was like c+p from another site. People have been displaying large numbers this way for a very long time. The fact you don't know this should embarrass you.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Brain Fart Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > covfefe Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Brain Fart Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > covfefe Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > Brain Fart Wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----
> > > > > > covfefe Wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----
> > > > > > > Doh! Wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > -----
> > > > > > > > Federal tax revenue by state
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Rank State Gross collections (in
> > > > > > > > thousands)[2] Revenue per capita
> > > > > (est.) Ratio
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > GSP
> > > > > > > >
> > 1 California $405,851,295 $10,408 16.6%
> > > > > > > > 2 Texas $279,904,425 $10,204 17.1%
> > > > > > > > 3 New
> York $269,716,999 $13,659 18.5%
> > > > > > > > 4 Florida $177,389,488 $8,762 19.9%
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Tx is getting 15B in aid from the
> fedz.
> >
> > > so
> > > > > > they
> > > > > > > put in 300M and get out 15B. helluva
> a
> > > > > deal...
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You ARE fucking retarded.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Gross collections (in thousands)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Do you know what that means?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > So why just not state the full number?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > This is be of those situations where you
> put
> > > your
> > > > stupidity on full display.
> > > >
> > > > Presenting the numbers "in thousands"
> allows
> > > > someone to present cleaner numbers and
> avoid
> > > > inundating the audience with overlarge
> > numbers.
> > >
> > > > This is done in financial statements
> > routinely.
> > > So
> > > > routinely, in fact, that the fact you
> didn't
> > > > recognize it and have to ask that question
> is
> > a
> > > > tell tale sign of just how uninformed you
> are
> > > > about things. It is also used in other
> data
> > > sets
> > > > that present large numbers, such as
> > population
> > > > numbers.
> > > >
> > > > I have to ask, given the fact that you just
> > out
> > > > your stupidity on full display for all to
> > see,
> > > do
> > > > you think your in any position to call
> > someone
> > > a
> > > > tard, tard?
> > >
> > >
> > > Yeah you're right. saying: $279,904,425
> > > (represented in 1000's) is much easier to
> read
> > > then 280B. go fuck yourself idiot.
> >
> >
> > Dude, I'm not the one that came up with using
> the
> > term "in thousands" when presenting numbers.
> It's
> > a long established a widely used method. The
> fact
> > that you've never noticed it and didn't
> recognize
> > it indicates you're an uneducated buffoon.
> >
> > You keep putting your stupidity on display when
> > you make your arguments. You really are stupid.
> > This is low level shit that most middle
> schoolers
> > have picked up on by now.
> >
> > To answer the question given you, as a tard,
> you
> > are in no position to pass judgement on anyone
> > else's intelligence.
>
> Irrespective, $279,904,425 (represented in 1000's)
> is much harder to read
> than 280B so state it as such next time. Think
> monkey, think.
Dude, I didn't write the numbers. It was like c+p from another site. People have been displaying large numbers this way for a very long time. The fact you don't know this should embarrass you.
Re: Should we use socialism to help Florida, Texas, and Louisiana?
Posted by:
covfefe's wing man
()
Date: September 10, 2017 08:41PM
Brain Fart Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> Dude, I didn't write the numbers. It was like c+p
> from another site. People have been displaying
> large numbers this way for a very long time. The
> fact you don't know this should embarrass you.
He does, he just can't concede that he fucked up. And he's too stupid to understand that this the line of nonsense that he went off on about it being confusing just makes him look even more fucking brain dead.
Could have made it easy for himself by just saying my bad, but noooooooo...
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> Dude, I didn't write the numbers. It was like c+p
> from another site. People have been displaying
> large numbers this way for a very long time. The
> fact you don't know this should embarrass you.
He does, he just can't concede that he fucked up. And he's too stupid to understand that this the line of nonsense that he went off on about it being confusing just makes him look even more fucking brain dead.
Could have made it easy for himself by just saying my bad, but noooooooo...
Re: Should we use socialism to help Florida, Texas, and Louisiana?
Posted by:
covfefe
()
Date: September 10, 2017 08:58PM
You know why they don't say or print $279,904,425 (represented in 1000's) on tv, magazines, and/or newspapers??!. 280B works better, monkey.
My signature: Remember the last time Trumptards tried to give us advice about politics then ended up storming the capitol and tried to overthrow our government? Yeah, no thanks morons.
My signature: Remember the last time Trumptards tried to give us advice about politics then ended up storming the capitol and tried to overthrow our government? Yeah, no thanks morons.
Re: Should we use socialism to help Florida, Texas, and Louisiana?
Posted by:
Just stop, it's pitiful
()
Date: September 10, 2017 09:08PM
covfefe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You know why they don't say or print $279,904,425
> (represented in 1000's) on tv, magazines, and/or
> newspapers??!. 280B works better, monkey.
You know why they do routinely in financial reports, government budget documents, population numbers, and other such things dealing with large numbers? Because everyone with a clue understands what ($ 000) means.
-------------------------------------------------------
> You know why they don't say or print $279,904,425
> (represented in 1000's) on tv, magazines, and/or
> newspapers??!. 280B works better, monkey.
You know why they do routinely in financial reports, government budget documents, population numbers, and other such things dealing with large numbers? Because everyone with a clue understands what ($ 000) means.
Re: Should we use socialism to help Florida, Texas, and Louisiana?
Posted by:
covfefe
()
Date: September 10, 2017 09:13PM
Are we governmental agency here clown?
My signature: Remember the last time Trumptards tried to give us advice about politics then ended up storming the capitol and tried to overthrow our government? Yeah, no thanks morons.
My signature: Remember the last time Trumptards tried to give us advice about politics then ended up storming the capitol and tried to overthrow our government? Yeah, no thanks morons.
Re: Should we use socialism to help Florida, Texas, and Louisiana?
Posted by:
NoImSayin
()
Date: September 10, 2017 09:16PM
SouthNetTakers Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Southern Whites LOVE taking more Federal money
> than they give - the Cities and North are their
> Sugar Daddies. They hate seeing people of color
> get the money though. They are too amoral and
> stupid to notice the hypocrisy.
But at least they give federal money.
Liberals think welfare is do life
-------------------------------------------------------
> Southern Whites LOVE taking more Federal money
> than they give - the Cities and North are their
> Sugar Daddies. They hate seeing people of color
> get the money though. They are too amoral and
> stupid to notice the hypocrisy.
But at least they give federal money.
Liberals think welfare is do life
Re: Should we use socialism to help Florida, Texas, and Louisiana?
Posted by:
WYB36
()
Date: September 10, 2017 09:22PM
covfefe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You know why they don't say or print $279,904,425
> (represented in 1000's) on tv, magazines, and/or
> newspapers??!. 280B works better, monkey.
Because they don't use scientific notation and want to preserve some number of significant digits.
Seriously, you are one fucking idiot.
-------------------------------------------------------
> You know why they don't say or print $279,904,425
> (represented in 1000's) on tv, magazines, and/or
> newspapers??!. 280B works better, monkey.
Because they don't use scientific notation and want to preserve some number of significant digits.
Seriously, you are one fucking idiot.
Re: Should we use socialism to help Florida, Texas, and Louisiana?
Posted by:
covefe keeps digging
()
Date: September 10, 2017 09:24PM
covfefe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Are we governmental agency here clown?
Were we discussing the revenue of government entities clown?
-------------------------------------------------------
> Are we governmental agency here clown?
Were we discussing the revenue of government entities clown?
Re: Should we use socialism to help Florida, Texas, and Louisiana?
Posted by:
covfefe
()
Date: September 10, 2017 09:31PM
http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-pol-sac-california-federal-government-money-20170205-story.html
See how this works monkey?
My signature: Remember the last time Trumptards tried to give us advice about politics then ended up storming the capitol and tried to overthrow our government? Yeah, no thanks morons.
See how this works monkey?
My signature: Remember the last time Trumptards tried to give us advice about politics then ended up storming the capitol and tried to overthrow our government? Yeah, no thanks morons.
Re: Should we use socialism to help Florida, Texas, and Louisiana?
Posted by:
LA Times throws dirt on covfefe
()
Date: September 10, 2017 09:46PM
covfefe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-pol-sac-califor
> nia-federal-government-money-20170205-story.html
>
> See how this works monkey?
http://www.latimes.com/la-avgdeduct703-story.html
-------------------------------------------------------
> http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-pol-sac-califor
> nia-federal-government-money-20170205-story.html
>
> See how this works monkey?
http://www.latimes.com/la-avgdeduct703-story.html
Re: Should we use socialism to help Florida, Texas, and Louisiana?
Posted by:
Brain Fart
()
Date: September 11, 2017 11:00AM
covfefe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You know why they don't say or print $279,904,425
> (represented in 1000's) on tv, magazines, and/or
> newspapers??!. 280B works better, monkey.
They do when they are displaying money numbers (or any other numbers) in a table form. See the LA Times example above. Again, the fact that you don't know this is a tell tale sign that you're a fucking bumbling idiot. Numbers have been presented this way since before you were born. You should be embarrassed that it took you this long to figure this out.
-------------------------------------------------------
> You know why they don't say or print $279,904,425
> (represented in 1000's) on tv, magazines, and/or
> newspapers??!. 280B works better, monkey.
They do when they are displaying money numbers (or any other numbers) in a table form. See the LA Times example above. Again, the fact that you don't know this is a tell tale sign that you're a fucking bumbling idiot. Numbers have been presented this way since before you were born. You should be embarrassed that it took you this long to figure this out.
Re: Should we use socialism to help Florida, Texas, and Louisiana?
Posted by:
Brain Fart
()
Date: September 11, 2017 11:03AM
covfefe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Are we governmental agency here clown?
The numbers were copied and pasted from Wikipedia, dumbass.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_tax_revenue_by_state#cite_note-2
Wikipedia used the IRS to generate their numbers.
https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/15databk.pdf
Do you know what the IRS is? Ding, ding, ding! A government agency.
Are you getting it yet?
-------------------------------------------------------
> Are we governmental agency here clown?
The numbers were copied and pasted from Wikipedia, dumbass.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_tax_revenue_by_state#cite_note-2
Wikipedia used the IRS to generate their numbers.
https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/15databk.pdf
Do you know what the IRS is? Ding, ding, ding! A government agency.
Are you getting it yet?
Re: Should we use socialism to help Florida, Texas, and Louisiana?
Posted by:
Brain Fart
()
Date: September 11, 2017 11:13AM
covfefe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-pol-sac-califor
> nia-federal-government-money-20170205-story.html
>
> See how this works monkey?
That's a headline, dumbo. It isn't a figure or table using numbers.
;
;
;
;
Getting it yet? Want more, dipshit? There's no shortage of examples.
Instead of whining like a bitch, you should be thanking me for educating you on this.
-------------------------------------------------------
> http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-pol-sac-califor
> nia-federal-government-money-20170205-story.html
>
> See how this works monkey?
That's a headline, dumbo. It isn't a figure or table using numbers.
;;;;Getting it yet? Want more, dipshit? There's no shortage of examples.
Instead of whining like a bitch, you should be thanking me for educating you on this.
Re: Should we use socialism to help Florida, Texas, and Louisiana?
Posted by:
hammer and nails
()
Date: September 11, 2017 01:17PM
Covefe is too stupid to be embarrassed about this. Even a halfwit would recognize the fuckup and own up to it. Cofefe is dumber than a halfwit.
Re: Should we use socialism to help Florida, Texas, and Louisiana?
Posted by:
She's ugly
()
Date: September 13, 2017 09:07PM
It's obvious that you have a mental disorder Gerry. Your posts are only about your hatred for Trump and at all times of the day and night. If goat porn was posted would you take a break from your crappy posts? Would you be able to write a coherent post without constant edits and re-edits?
For Christ sake. The last person on this board to own another on this site is when big E got into the "dark humor" pedo joking mental midgets mind. Trump lives in your mind rent free son. You are owned like a rented donkey in Tijuana and whipped about the same.
How great is it that Hillary was never elected and never will be elected again.
The person that I feel sorry for is old Bill. He'll never be able to get another blowjob in the big house.
Anyway, go fuck yourself where you live and breathe. We laugh at you Ravi.
For Christ sake. The last person on this board to own another on this site is when big E got into the "dark humor" pedo joking mental midgets mind. Trump lives in your mind rent free son. You are owned like a rented donkey in Tijuana and whipped about the same.
How great is it that Hillary was never elected and never will be elected again.
The person that I feel sorry for is old Bill. He'll never be able to get another blowjob in the big house.
Anyway, go fuck yourself where you live and breathe. We laugh at you Ravi.