HomeFairfax General ForumArrest/Ticket SearchWiki newPictures/VideosChatArticlesLinksAbout
Off-Topic :  Fairfax Underground fairfax underground logo
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Violence is OK
Posted by: wdynh ()
Date: August 23, 2017 12:03PM

In the current environment, critical thinking, logic and reason has been kicked to the turf.

On the one hand we have the advent of safe spaces to protect innocent children from being exposed to even the possibility of facing a view or idea that might not be in lockstep with modern thinking. We have Google firing employees who dare to even question the mental reprogramming and propaganda being forced upon their unwitting and apparently sometimes unwilling staff. Google and their cohorts are protecting their emotionally fragile children from microaggressions. Microaggressions are being touted as being tantamount to physical violence. Interrupting a co-worker in a staff meeting is being equated with physical violence. Expressing non-conformist views it is now being argued is a form of violence that is on par with physical attacks.

On the other hand these same people are advocating the use of physical violence to attack those that might be publicly expressing views they disagree with. The fragile children in these same institutions are being taught that it is not only OK but necessary that they physically assault those they disagree with. I saw multiple analysts on CNN recently arguing that it is OK to destroy someone else’s private property (burn cars, break windows, etc.) during protests because and I quote: “violence against property is not the same as violence against a person.” The claimed it is normal and necessary to destroy property during protests because it is justifiable.

I wish I could understand what is going on here but it isn’t good for modern civilization.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Violence is OK
Posted by: Plplp ()
Date: August 23, 2017 12:09PM

If u want to get along with liberals, all liberals included, u gotta go along with their nonsense, and all their views and bullshit
If u don't wanna get along with liberals u usually follow logic or what makes sense.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Violence is OK
Posted by: Trump Dumbass ()
Date: August 23, 2017 12:12PM

Violence is never the answer. That's why I defend the right to put Confederate statues on public property.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Violence is OK
Posted by: 3dvd3 ()
Date: August 23, 2017 12:19PM

"I CLUB COMMUNISTS"
"I BASH BOLSHEVIKS"
"I SMASH SOCIALISTS"
"I ATTACK ANARCHISTS"

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Violence is OK
Posted by: Ffffh ()
Date: August 23, 2017 01:00PM

Liberals love violence why is that?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Violence is OK
Posted by: Violence is ALWAYS the answer ()
Date: August 23, 2017 01:12PM

If you don't agree with me I'll fuck you up or have someone else fuck you up!

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Violence is OK
Posted by: trumpitality ()
Date: August 23, 2017 01:47PM

wdynh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> In the current environment, critical thinking,
> logic and reason has been kicked to the turf.
>
> On the one hand we have the advent of safe spaces
> to protect innocent children from being exposed to
> even the possibility of facing a view or idea that
> might not be in lockstep with modern thinking. We
> have Google firing employees who dare to even
> question the mental reprogramming and propaganda
> being forced upon their unwitting and apparently
> sometimes unwilling staff. Google and their
> cohorts are protecting their emotionally fragile
> children from microaggressions. Microaggressions
> are being touted as being tantamount to physical
> violence. Interrupting a co-worker in a staff
> meeting is being equated with physical violence.
> Expressing non-conformist views it is now being
> argued is a form of violence that is on par with
> physical attacks.
>
> On the other hand these same people are advocating
> the use of physical violence to attack those that
> might be publicly expressing views they disagree
> with. The fragile children in these same
> institutions are being taught that it is not only
> OK but necessary that they physically assault
> those they disagree with. I saw multiple analysts
> on CNN recently arguing that it is OK to destroy
> someone else’s private property (burn cars,
> break windows, etc.) during protests because and I
> quote: “violence against property is not the
> same as violence against a person.” The claimed
> it is normal and necessary to destroy property
> during protests because it is justifiable.
>
> I wish I could understand what is going on here
> but it isn’t good for modern civilization.


Thank you. It appears modern civilization is what these folks wish to destroy.
It could be the New World Order proponents - Liberals - thought they had a smooth ride and they could shove it down our throats on the down-low, but Trump's election screwed that up, so now they have to come out in the open and accomplish their aims by violent overthrow.

They're causing quite a ruckus but it won't work; it's too early and there's still enough of us left to prevent it.

Thank You, President Trump.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Violence is OK
Posted by: Donald Troll ()
Date: August 23, 2017 02:06PM

wdynh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> In the current environment, critical thinking,
> logic and reason has been kicked to the turf.
>
> On the one hand we have the advent of safe spaces
> to protect innocent children from being exposed to
> even the possibility of facing a view or idea that
> might not be in lockstep with modern thinking. We
> have Google firing employees who dare to even
> question the mental reprogramming and propaganda
> being forced upon their unwitting and apparently
> sometimes unwilling staff. Google and their
> cohorts are protecting their emotionally fragile
> children from microaggressions. Microaggressions
> are being touted as being tantamount to physical
> violence. Interrupting a co-worker in a staff
> meeting is being equated with physical violence.
> Expressing non-conformist views it is now being
> argued is a form of violence that is on par with
> physical attacks.
>
> On the other hand these same people are advocating
> the use of physical violence to attack those that
> might be publicly expressing views they disagree
> with. The fragile children in these same
> institutions are being taught that it is not only
> OK but necessary that they physically assault
> those they disagree with. I saw multiple analysts
> on CNN recently arguing that it is OK to destroy
> someone else’s private property (burn cars,
> break windows, etc.) during protests because and I
> quote: “violence against property is not the
> same as violence against a person.” The claimed
> it is normal and necessary to destroy property
> during protests because it is justifiable.
>
> I wish I could understand what is going on here
> but it isn’t good for modern civilization.


might be one of the stupider attempts at trolling i've seen on here lately

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Violence is OK
Posted by: nog hauler rider ()
Date: August 23, 2017 03:21PM

They are nothing more than spoiled children.

This shit will stop the moment people stop fucking tolerating it. Just because a fat cunt with pink hair calls you a racist doesn't make it so.

People need to stand up and beat their asses a few times and this shit will stop. They are only continuing because CNN and MSNBC are stoking them by covering it. We haven't had any good nigger riot porn lately so now we're on to fag snowflake liberal protest porn.

The dude in Phoenix that got shot in the balls with a pepper canister was a good start - now let's keep it going.

That cop is sitting back there looking through his scope going "watch this...right in the balls". Yes!

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Violence is OK
Posted by: pvdne ()
Date: August 23, 2017 04:40PM

Donald Troll Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> wdynh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > In the current environment, critical thinking,
> > logic and reason has been kicked to the turf.
> >
> > On the one hand we have the advent of safe
> spaces
> > to protect innocent children from being exposed
> to
> > even the possibility of facing a view or idea
> that
> > might not be in lockstep with modern thinking.
> We
> > have Google firing employees who dare to even
> > question the mental reprogramming and
> propaganda
> > being forced upon their unwitting and
> apparently
> > sometimes unwilling staff. Google and their
> > cohorts are protecting their emotionally
> fragile
> > children from microaggressions.
> Microaggressions
> > are being touted as being tantamount to
> physical
> > violence. Interrupting a co-worker in a staff
> > meeting is being equated with physical violence.
>
> > Expressing non-conformist views it is now being
> > argued is a form of violence that is on par
> with
> > physical attacks.
> >
> > On the other hand these same people are
> advocating
> > the use of physical violence to attack those
> that
> > might be publicly expressing views they
> disagree
> > with. The fragile children in these same
> > institutions are being taught that it is not
> only
> > OK but necessary that they physically assault
> > those they disagree with. I saw multiple
> analysts
> > on CNN recently arguing that it is OK to
> destroy
> > someone else’s private property (burn cars,
> > break windows, etc.) during protests because and
> I
> > quote: “violence against property is not the
> > same as violence against a person.” The
> claimed
> > it is normal and necessary to destroy property
> > during protests because it is justifiable.
> >
> > I wish I could understand what is going on here
> > but it isn’t good for modern civilization.
>
>
> might be one of the stupider attempts at trolling
> i've seen on here lately

It is stupid. But it's all true. And it is happening.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Violence is OK
Posted by: Should of got D Kizer ()
Date: August 23, 2017 05:04PM

Ryan Anderson is a good player . KC would of schooled him up,
Deshaun Kizer before rolling, next year. Ryan Anderson better be like 72!
Attachments:
IMG_5952.JPG
IMG_6141.JPG
IMG_6109.JPG
IMG_6110.JPG
IMG_6108.JPG

Options: ReplyQuote


Your Name: 
Your Email (Optional): 
Subject: 
Attach a file
  • No file can be larger than 75 MB
  • All files together cannot be larger than 300 MB
  • 30 more file(s) can be attached to this message
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 ********   **     **  ********   *******   **     ** 
 **     **  **     **     **     **     **  ***   *** 
 **     **  **     **     **     **         **** **** 
 ********   *********     **     ********   ** *** ** 
 **     **  **     **     **     **     **  **     ** 
 **     **  **     **     **     **     **  **     ** 
 ********   **     **     **      *******   **     ** 
This forum powered by Phorum.