Brennan: "Clear evidence that Russia influenced US election so Trump could win."

Goal of Russia was make the US election process look like a joke and make the US population doubt that the election process worked. Evidence exists but cannot be shared in an open hearing.

No, not really, but you seemed so lonely out on that branch by yourself. Would you like to come inside? We have cocoa and a nice white jacket for you. Yes, it makes you hug yourself, but that's what you need right now.

So what did he say about team trump and Russia ?

Other nuggets:

“I don’t know whether such collusion existed.”

Brennan also denounced the leaks of classified information that continue to appear in the news media, including details from Trump’s recent Oval Office meeting with Russia’s foreign minister and ambassador.

"These continue to be very, very damaging leaks, and I find them appalling, and they need to be tracked down," Brennan said.

Lol! I thought it was Comey?

The Russians?

Lol!

Still?

Lol!

Were they talking? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> So what did he say about team trump and Russia ?

There is communication between Russia and members of the Trump administration. Brennan/FBI does not have full knowledge of the nature of the communications. CIA and NSA may have knowledge of the contents of the communications. Communications look suspicious in nature.

Trump sharing intel with Russia does put American intel lives at risk now. Severely hurt intelligence community operations.

JUST.SHUT.UP!

^^^fucking moron Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> JUST.SHUT.UP!

Why

He gargles animal urine.

Clapper and Brennan are two of the biggest leaking Dark State spooks that have been trying to overthrow a legally elected President of the United States. We all know they are the primary leakers along with Comey. Who do they think they are kidding. And they are also proven liars having provided false testimony to Congress in the past.

Breaking Now Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Were they talking? Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > So what did he say about team trump and Russia
> ?
>
> There is communication between Russia and members
> of the Trump administration. Brennan/FBI does not
> have full knowledge of the nature of the
> communications. CIA and NSA may have knowledge of
> the contents of the communications.
> Communications look suspicious in nature.

^^^^
The very definition of McCarthyism. This is how Stalin's show trials operated.

trousersaflame Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Clapper and Brennan are two of the biggest leaking
> Dark State spooks that have been trying to
> overthrow a legally elected President of the
> United States. We all know they are the primary
> leakers along with Comey. Who do they think they
> are kidding. And they are also proven liars
> having provided false testimony to Congress in the
> past.


Translation
I don't like the facts

ejtwv Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Breaking Now Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Were they talking? Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > So what did he say about team trump and
> Russia
> > ?
> >
> > There is communication between Russia and
> members
> > of the Trump administration. Brennan/FBI does
> not
> > have full knowledge of the nature of the
> > communications. CIA and NSA may have knowledge
> of
> > the contents of the communications.
> > Communications look suspicious in nature.
>
> ^^^^
> The very definition of McCarthyism. This is how
> Stalin's show trials operated.


We really need to get back to Obama's birth certificat

He conned you Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> trousersaflame Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Clapper and Brennan are two of the biggest
> leaking
> > Dark State spooks that have been trying to
> > overthrow a legally elected President of the
> > United States. We all know they are the
> primary
> > leakers along with Comey. Who do they think
> they
> > are kidding. And they are also proven liars
> > having provided false testimony to Congress in
> the
> > past.
>
>
> Translation
> I don't like the facts


I love facts. Can you point to the one that shows evidence of collusion?

I like facts Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> He conned you Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > trousersaflame Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Clapper and Brennan are two of the biggest
> > leaking
> > > Dark State spooks that have been trying to
> > > overthrow a legally elected President of the
> > > United States. We all know they are the
> > primary
> > > leakers along with Comey. Who do they think
> > they
> > > are kidding. And they are also proven liars
> > > having provided false testimony to Congress
> in
> > the
> > > past.
> >
> >
> > Translation
> > I don't like the facts
>
>
> I love facts. Can you point to the one that shows
> evidence of collusion?


Did anyone on this tread say that.....
They did say the Russians influenced the election

The trumptard defense is to bring up something that wasn't said to distract from what was said

Russia had contact Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I like facts Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > He conned you Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > trousersaflame Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > Clapper and Brennan are two of the biggest
> > > leaking
> > > > Dark State spooks that have been trying to
> > > > overthrow a legally elected President of
> the
> > > > United States. We all know they are the
> > > primary
> > > > leakers along with Comey. Who do they
> think
> > > they
> > > > are kidding. And they are also proven
> liars
> > > > having provided false testimony to Congress
> > in
> > > the
> > > > past.
> > >
> > >
> > > Translation
> > > I don't like the facts
> >
> >
> > I love facts. Can you point to the one that
> shows
> > evidence of collusion?
>
>
> Did anyone on this tread say that.....
> They did say the Russians influenced the election
>
>
> The trumptard defense is to bring up something
> that wasn't said to distract from what was said


Oh, c'mon, it's the elephant in the room. Collusion has been alleged for months by you libtards. Now, all of a sudden when asked to put up, you change the subject like a good little bitch.

I like facts Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> He conned you Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > trousersaflame Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Clapper and Brennan are two of the biggest
> > leaking
> > > Dark State spooks that have been trying to
> > > overthrow a legally elected President of the
> > > United States. We all know they are the
> > primary
> > > leakers along with Comey. Who do they think
> > they
> > > are kidding. And they are also proven liars
> > > having provided false testimony to Congress
> in
> > the
> > > past.
> >
> >
> > Translation
> > I don't like the facts
>
>
> I love facts. Can you point to the one that shows
> evidence of collusion?

Even if the libtarded fictional collusion happened, it's not a crime.

The democrats rigged their own primary and Bernie supporters have a class action lawsuit against the DNC. Has SNL reported on that?

I like facts Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Russia had contact Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I like facts Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > He conned you Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > trousersaflame Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > Clapper and Brennan are two of the
> biggest
> > > > leaking
> > > > > Dark State spooks that have been trying
> to
> > > > > overthrow a legally elected President of
> > the
> > > > > United States. We all know they are the
> > > > primary
> > > > > leakers along with Comey. Who do they
> > think
> > > > they
> > > > > are kidding. And they are also proven
> > liars
> > > > > having provided false testimony to
> Congress
> > > in
> > > > the
> > > > > past.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Translation
> > > > I don't like the facts
> > >
> > >
> > > I love facts. Can you point to the one that
> > shows
> > > evidence of collusion?
> >
> >
> > Did anyone on this tread say that.....
> > They did say the Russians influenced the
> election
> >
> >
> > The trumptard defense is to bring up something
> > that wasn't said to distract from what was said
>
>
> Oh, c'mon, it's the elephant in the room.
> Collusion has been alleged for months by you
> libtards. Now, all of a sudden when asked to put
> up, you change the subject like a good little
> bitch.


From election day trumptards said their was no Russian involvement. We now know there was so trumpers change to collusion

To answer the collision charge eventhough it wasn't brought up- maybe it happened but public hasn't seen any clear evidence
There are indications of trump team and Russia contacts - no clue if that means anything
Flynn doses seem to have some issue but he could be a lone wolf

Ihbn Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I like facts Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Russia had contact Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > I like facts Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > He conned you Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > trousersaflame Wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----
> > > > > > Clapper and Brennan are two of the
> > biggest
> > > > > leaking
> > > > > > Dark State spooks that have been trying
> > to
> > > > > > overthrow a legally elected President
> of
> > > the
> > > > > > United States. We all know they are
> the
> > > > > primary
> > > > > > leakers along with Comey. Who do they
> > > think
> > > > > they
> > > > > > are kidding. And they are also proven
> > > liars
> > > > > > having provided false testimony to
> > Congress
> > > > in
> > > > > the
> > > > > > past.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Translation
> > > > > I don't like the facts
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I love facts. Can you point to the one
> that
> > > shows
> > > > evidence of collusion?
> > >
> > >
> > > Did anyone on this tread say that.....
> > > They did say the Russians influenced the
> > election
> > >
> > >
> > > The trumptard defense is to bring up
> something
> > > that wasn't said to distract from what was
> said
> >
> >
> > Oh, c'mon, it's the elephant in the room.
> > Collusion has been alleged for months by you
> > libtards. Now, all of a sudden when asked to
> put
> > up, you change the subject like a good little
> > bitch.
>
>
> From election day trumptards said their was no
> Russian involvement. We now know there was so
> trumpers change to collusion
>
> To answer the collision charge eventhough it
> wasn't brought up- maybe it happened but public
> hasn't seen any clear evidence
> There are indications of trump team and Russia
> contacts - no clue if that means anything
> Flynn doses seem to have some issue but he could
> be a lone wolf


Good God! Drinking already?

Now there is Russian collision? Hope they have insurance!
Lol!

Obama already said before the election that there was no interference to US elections. Was he lying?

KKKillary KKKlinton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Ihbn Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I like facts Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Russia had contact Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > I like facts Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > He conned you Wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----
> > > > > > trousersaflame Wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----
> > > > > > > Clapper and Brennan are two of the
> > > biggest
> > > > > > leaking
> > > > > > > Dark State spooks that have been
> trying
> > > to
> > > > > > > overthrow a legally elected President
> > of
> > > > the
> > > > > > > United States. We all know they are
> > the
> > > > > > primary
> > > > > > > leakers along with Comey. Who do
> they
> > > > think
> > > > > > they
> > > > > > > are kidding. And they are also
> proven
> > > > liars
> > > > > > > having provided false testimony to
> > > Congress
> > > > > in
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > past.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Translation
> > > > > > I don't like the facts
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I love facts. Can you point to the one
> > that
> > > > shows
> > > > > evidence of collusion?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Did anyone on this tread say that.....
> > > > They did say the Russians influenced the
> > > election
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The trumptard defense is to bring up
> > something
> > > > that wasn't said to distract from what was
> > said
> > >
> > >
> > > Oh, c'mon, it's the elephant in the room.
> > > Collusion has been alleged for months by you
> > > libtards. Now, all of a sudden when asked to
> > put
> > > up, you change the subject like a good little
> > > bitch.
> >
> >
> > From election day trumptards said their was no
> > Russian involvement. We now know there was so
> > trumpers change to collusion
> >
> > To answer the collision charge eventhough it
> > wasn't brought up- maybe it happened but public
> > hasn't seen any clear evidence
> > There are indications of trump team and Russia
> > contacts - no clue if that means anything
> > Flynn doses seem to have some issue but he
> could
> > be a lone wolf
>
>
> Good God! Drinking already?
>
> Now there is Russian collision? Hope they have
> insurance!
> Lol!
>
> Obama already said before the election that there
> was no interference to US elections. Was he lying?


When did he say that?

He conned you Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> trousersaflame Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Clapper and Brennan are two of the biggest
> leaking
> > Dark State spooks that have been trying to
> > overthrow a legally elected President of the
> > United States. We all know they are the
> primary
> > leakers along with Comey. Who do they think
> they
> > are kidding. And they are also proven liars
> > having provided false testimony to Congress in
> the
> > past.
>
>
> Translation
> I don't like the facts

Real translation - they lie a lot.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2014/mar/11/james-clappers-testimony-one-year-later/

http://www.weeklystandard.com/senators-push-brennan-on-misleading-testimony/article/701257

pcdnb Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> He conned you Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > trousersaflame Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Clapper and Brennan are two of the biggest
> > leaking
> > > Dark State spooks that have been trying to
> > > overthrow a legally elected President of the
> > > United States. We all know they are the
> > primary
> > > leakers along with Comey. Who do they think
> > they
> > > are kidding. And they are also proven liars
> > > having provided false testimony to Congress
> in
> > the
> > > past.
> >
> >
> > Translation
> > I don't like the facts
>
> Real translation - they lie a lot.
>
> http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/20
> 14/mar/11/james-clappers-testimony-one-year-later/
>
>
> http://www.weeklystandard.com/senators-push-brenna
> n-on-misleading-testimony/article/701257

nothing on Comey
The law makers had the truth from classified briefings
Oh it still does make what they said about Russia wrong

Ihbn Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I like facts Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Russia had contact Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > I like facts Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > He conned you Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > trousersaflame Wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----
> > > > > > Clapper and Brennan are two of the
> > biggest
> > > > > leaking
> > > > > > Dark State spooks that have been trying
> > to
> > > > > > overthrow a legally elected President
> of
> > > the
> > > > > > United States. We all know they are
> the
> > > > > primary
> > > > > > leakers along with Comey. Who do they
> > > think
> > > > > they
> > > > > > are kidding. And they are also proven
> > > liars
> > > > > > having provided false testimony to
> > Congress
> > > > in
> > > > > the
> > > > > > past.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Translation
> > > > > I don't like the facts
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I love facts. Can you point to the one
> that
> > > shows
> > > > evidence of collusion?
> > >
> > >
> > > Did anyone on this tread say that.....
> > > They did say the Russians influenced the
> > election
> > >
> > >
> > > The trumptard defense is to bring up
> something
> > > that wasn't said to distract from what was
> said
> >
> >
> > Oh, c'mon, it's the elephant in the room.
> > Collusion has been alleged for months by you
> > libtards. Now, all of a sudden when asked to
> put
> > up, you change the subject like a good little
> > bitch.
>
>
> From election day trumptards said their was no
> Russian involvement. We now know there was so
> trumpers change to collusion

Bullshit. There have been two questions arising out of this news. The first question has always been did the interference influence the outcome? Trump and his supporters have said no. The second question is was there collusion? Libtards have been trying to spin it that way for months. Unfortunately for them, they have not been able to prove that allegation.

Keep in mind that under Obama, Susan Rice, Brennan, et. al. looked into this and couldn't produce evidence of collusion. So, those that had the most incentive to find something couldn't come up with it. So, where is it?

> To answer the collision charge eventhough it
> wasn't brought up- maybe it happened but public
> hasn't seen any clear evidence
> There are indications of trump team and Russia
> contacts - no clue if that means anything
> Flynn doses seem to have some issue but he could
> be a lone wolf

Contacts =/= collusion.

Ihbn Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

>
>
> From election day trumptards said their was no
> Russian involvement. We now know there was so
> trumpers change to collusion

OK. I'll bite. Forget about the "collusion" shit.

What exactly did the Russians do? How did they "influence" the election and how was there any Russian "involvement?"

Be specific - no generalities.

All I have heard is things about fake news stories on Facebook (pages that got 5K views total – lol! election shifting for sure), Russian genius marketing hacks that coined the term “Crooked Hillary” (thank god for Russian intellect – I’m sure no American could have thought of that), and internet trolls on message boards and forums. That’s about it. It’s really really pathetic.

I like facts Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Ihbn Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I like facts Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Russia had contact Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > I like facts Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > He conned you Wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----
> > > > > > trousersaflame Wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----
> > > > > > > Clapper and Brennan are two of the
> > > biggest
> > > > > > leaking
> > > > > > > Dark State spooks that have been
> trying
> > > to
> > > > > > > overthrow a legally elected President
> > of
> > > > the
> > > > > > > United States. We all know they are
> > the
> > > > > > primary
> > > > > > > leakers along with Comey. Who do
> they
> > > > think
> > > > > > they
> > > > > > > are kidding. And they are also
> proven
> > > > liars
> > > > > > > having provided false testimony to
> > > Congress
> > > > > in
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > past.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Translation
> > > > > > I don't like the facts
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I love facts. Can you point to the one
> > that
> > > > shows
> > > > > evidence of collusion?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Did anyone on this tread say that.....
> > > > They did say the Russians influenced the
> > > election
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The trumptard defense is to bring up
> > something
> > > > that wasn't said to distract from what was
> > said
> > >
> > >
> > > Oh, c'mon, it's the elephant in the room.
> > > Collusion has been alleged for months by you
> > > libtards. Now, all of a sudden when asked to
> > put
> > > up, you change the subject like a good little
> > > bitch.
> >
> >
> > From election day trumptards said their was no
> > Russian involvement. We now know there was so
> > trumpers change to collusion
>
> Bullshit. There have been two questions arising
> out of this news. The first question has always
> been did the interference influence the outcome?
> Trump and his supporters have said no. The second
> question is was there collusion? Libtards have
> been trying to spin it that way for months.
> Unfortunately for them, they have not been able to
> prove that allegation.
>
> Keep in mind that under Obama, Susan Rice,
> Brennan, et. al. looked into this and couldn't
> produce evidence of collusion. So, those that had
> the most incentive to find something couldn't come
> up with it. So, where is it?
>
> > To answer the collision charge eventhough it
> > wasn't brought up- maybe it happened but public
> > hasn't seen any clear evidence
> > There are indications of trump team and Russia
> > contacts - no clue if that means anything
> > Flynn doses seem to have some issue but he
> could
> > be a lone wolf
>
> Contacts =/= collusion.


We agree
But there could be and hence the investagation

supplemental reporter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Other nuggets:
>
> “I don’t know whether such collusion
> existed.”
>
> Brennan also denounced the leaks of classified
> information that continue to appear in the news
> media, including details from Trump’s recent
> Oval Office meeting with Russia’s foreign
> minister and ambassador.
>
> "These continue to be very, very damaging leaks,
> and I find them appalling, and they need to be
> tracked down," Brennan said.


AG Sessions is on the case!

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2017/05/16/doj-we-are-ready-to-find-and-prosecute-leakers

hley7 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Ihbn Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> >
> >
> > From election day trumptards said their was no
> > Russian involvement. We now know there was so
> > trumpers change to collusion
>
> OK. I'll bite. Forget about the "collusion"
> shit.
>
> What exactly did the Russians do? How did they
> "influence" the election and how was there any
> Russian "involvement?"
>
> Be specific - no generalities.
>
> All I have heard is things about fake news stories
> on Facebook (pages that got 5K views total –
> lol! election shifting for sure), Russian genius
> marketing hacks that coined the term “Crooked
> Hillary” (thank god for Russian intellect –
> I’m sure no American could have thought of
> that), and internet trolls on message boards and
> forums. That’s about it. It’s really really
> pathetic.


And if I give you good links you will say it's fake news
You won't beleive the head of the intelligence agencies, some appointed by trump
I guess we will have to wait on all the investagations
I asumme you will call them fake too if they don't go your way

gov'na Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> supplemental reporter Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Other nuggets:
> >
> > “I don’t know whether such collusion
> > existed.”
> >
> > Brennan also denounced the leaks of classified
> > information that continue to appear in the news
> > media, including details from Trump’s recent
> > Oval Office meeting with Russia’s foreign
> > minister and ambassador.
> >
> > "These continue to be very, very damaging
> leaks,
> > and I find them appalling, and they need to be
> > tracked down," Brennan said.
>
>
> AG Sessions is on the case!
>
> http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2017/05/16/d
> oj-we-are-ready-to-find-and-prosecute-leakers


Sessions is a liar

Bottom line is Trump won by getting help from the Russians that rigged that election for Trump.

Now as to if Trump was directly communicating with the Russian government to rig the elections is still under investigation. There is no evidence to public yet that says Trump's comminucations with the Russians at election time were communications about rigging the US election.

Just evidence that Trump and Trump administration did have communications with the Russians during the election. The Trump administration could of been talking sports scores.... only the NSA and CIA can look up in their collection databases what was said.

Facts of Hearing Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Bottom line is Trump won by getting help from the
> Russians that rigged that election for Trump.

First, that allegation is impossible to prove. Second, you have no evidence to offer to prove that allegation.

> Now as to if Trump was directly communicating with
> the Russian government to rig the elections is
> still under investigation. There is no evidence
> to public yet that says Trump's comminucations
> with the Russians at election time were
> communications about rigging the US election.

Of course there isn't.

> Just evidence that Trump and Trump administration
> did have communications with the Russians during
> the election. The Trump administration could of
> been talking sports scores.... only the NSA and
> CIA can look up in their collection databases what
> was said.

And it has taken 10 months to pull the 702 records? C'mon, Susan Rice was reading the 702 transcripts pretty much as they happened.

#fakenews Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Facts of Hearing Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Bottom line is Trump won by getting help from
> the
> > Russians that rigged that election for Trump.
>
> First, that allegation is impossible to prove.
> Second, you have no evidence to offer to prove
> that allegation.
>
> > Now as to if Trump was directly communicating
> with
> > the Russian government to rig the elections is
> > still under investigation. There is no
> evidence
> > to public yet that says Trump's comminucations
> > with the Russians at election time were
> > communications about rigging the US election.
>
> Of course there isn't.
>
> > Just evidence that Trump and Trump
> administration
> > did have communications with the Russians
> during
> > the election. The Trump administration could
> of
> > been talking sports scores.... only the NSA and
> > CIA can look up in their collection databases
> what
> > was said.
>
> And it has taken 10 months to pull the 702
> records? C'mon, Susan Rice was reading the 702
> transcripts pretty much as they happened.

I am just repeating the testimony from the hearing today.

The only proven collusion was CNN giving Hillary the debate questions to influence the election.

Also the fraud the DNC pulled on Bernie voters.

That's proven.

Facts of Hearing Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> #fakenews Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Facts of Hearing Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Bottom line is Trump won by getting help from
> > the
> > > Russians that rigged that election for Trump.
>
> >
> > First, that allegation is impossible to prove.
> > Second, you have no evidence to offer to prove
> > that allegation.
> >
> > > Now as to if Trump was directly communicating
> > with
> > > the Russian government to rig the elections
> is
> > > still under investigation. There is no
> > evidence
> > > to public yet that says Trump's
> comminucations
> > > with the Russians at election time were
> > > communications about rigging the US election.
>
> >
> > Of course there isn't.
> >
> > > Just evidence that Trump and Trump
> > administration
> > > did have communications with the Russians
> > during
> > > the election. The Trump administration could
> > of
> > > been talking sports scores.... only the NSA
> and
> > > CIA can look up in their collection databases
> > what
> > > was said.
> >
> > And it has taken 10 months to pull the 702
> > records? C'mon, Susan Rice was reading the 702
> > transcripts pretty much as they happened.
>
> I am just repeating the testimony from the hearing
> today.


No you're not. There was no testimony presented at the hearing that Trump won because of Russian interference. Nobody said that. You can either walk back your statement or continue to lie.

> No you're not. There was no testimony presented
> at the hearing that Trump won because of Russian
> interference. Nobody said that. You can either
> walk back your statement or continue to lie.

Very simple. Evidence- The Russians messed with the US election so Trump would win.(Proven\Evidence)

Trump won the election(Proven\Evidence)

What part don't you understand?

Whack Case Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> > No you're not. There was no testimony
> presented
> > at the hearing that Trump won because of
> Russian
> > interference. Nobody said that. You can
> either
> > walk back your statement or continue to lie.
>
> Very simple. Evidence- The Russians messed with
> the US election so Trump would
> win.(Proven\Evidence)
>
> Trump won the election(Proven\Evidence)
>
> What part don't you understand?


I think his point is that wasn't said in the hearings today

Whack Case Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> > No you're not. There was no testimony
> presented
> > at the hearing that Trump won because of
> Russian
> > interference. Nobody said that. You can
> either
> > walk back your statement or continue to lie.
>
> Very simple. Evidence- The Russians messed with
> the US election so Trump would
> win.(Proven\Evidence)
>
> Trump won the election(Proven\Evidence)
>
> What part don't you understand?

The part where you actually prove or present any evidence of either being a fact. I just have to shake my head that you libs are so easily duped by partisan politics. CNN been covering this non-stop for 5 months and they still have no evidence of any of your claims. None. There is nothing. Literally nothing other than verbal claims. I am beginning to understand how the Salem Witch Trials worked.

Whack Case Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> > No you're not. There was no testimony
> presented
> > at the hearing that Trump won because of
> Russian
> > interference. Nobody said that. You can
> either
> > walk back your statement or continue to lie.
>
> Very simple. Evidence- The Russians messed with
> the US election so Trump would
> win.(Proven\Evidence)
>
> Trump won the election(Proven\Evidence)
>
> What part don't you understand?


Correlation does not imply causation. You are committing a logical fallacy. The fact that you don't understand that is somewhat telling about the level of intellect you possess.

Brennan is an intelligent man. He would not make an assertion without evidence. There is no evidence that the Russian influence was the proximate cause, or even any cause, of Trump's electoral victory. You simply can't prove that. You'd have to delve into the minds of the voters to determine that and that is impossible.

Understand?

Maxine Waters asserted that the Russians came up with the catchphrase "Crooked Hillary" in coordination with the Trump campaign and this is an impeachable offense. That was her best shot. Who can top that?

FFXU Court Reporter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Brennan: "Clear evidence that Russia influenced US
> election so Trump could win."
>
> Goal of Russia was make the US election process
> look like a joke and make the US population doubt
> that the election process worked. Evidence exists
> but cannot be shared in an open hearing.
Attachments:

#fakenews Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Whack Case Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > > No you're not. There was no testimony
> > presented
> > > at the hearing that Trump won because of
> > Russian
> > > interference. Nobody said that. You can
> > either
> > > walk back your statement or continue to lie.
> >
> > Very simple. Evidence- The Russians messed
> with
> > the US election so Trump would
> > win.(Proven\Evidence)
> >
> > Trump won the election(Proven\Evidence)
> >
> > What part don't you understand?
>
>
> Correlation does not imply causation. You are
> committing a logical fallacy. The fact that you
> don't understand that is somewhat telling about
> the level of intellect you possess.
>
> Brennan is an intelligent man. He would not make
> an assertion without evidence. There is no
> evidence that the Russian influence was the
> proximate cause, or even any cause, of Trump's
> electoral victory. You simply can't prove that.
> You'd have to delve into the minds of the voters
> to determine that and that is impossible.
>
> Understand?


Good post and I tend to agree
But since your guy won you seem to have no trouble with the Russians trying to influence our election

To me the main reason Hillary lost because she ran a bad race

Be honest
What if the Russians were for for Hillary and she won - what would you be thinking?

maxinewaters Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Maxine Waters asserted that the Russians came up
> with the catchphrase "Crooked Hillary" in
> coordination with the Trump campaign and this is
> an impeachable offense. That was her best shot.
> Who can top that?


Impeaching Obama over his birth certificat

Fhjk Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> #fakenews Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Whack Case Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > > No you're not. There was no testimony
> > > presented
> > > > at the hearing that Trump won because of
> > > Russian
> > > > interference. Nobody said that. You can
> > > either
> > > > walk back your statement or continue to
> lie.
> > >
> > > Very simple. Evidence- The Russians messed
> > with
> > > the US election so Trump would
> > > win.(Proven\Evidence)
> > >
> > > Trump won the election(Proven\Evidence)
> > >
> > > What part don't you understand?
> >
> >
> > Correlation does not imply causation. You are
> > committing a logical fallacy. The fact that
> you
> > don't understand that is somewhat telling about
> > the level of intellect you possess.
> >
> > Brennan is an intelligent man. He would not
> make
> > an assertion without evidence. There is no
> > evidence that the Russian influence was the
> > proximate cause, or even any cause, of Trump's
> > electoral victory. You simply can't prove that.
>
> > You'd have to delve into the minds of the
> voters
> > to determine that and that is impossible.
> >
> > Understand?
>
>
> Good post and I tend to agree
> But since your guy won you seem to have no trouble
> with the Russians trying to influence our
> election

I don't believe that is a fair or accurate assessment. I have trouble with accusations of collusion with no evidence presented thus far. I have trouble with the contention that without Russian interference Trump was destined to lose.

Members of Congress who go on the floor of the House or give press conferences calling for impeachment without evidence of criminal activity do as much to undermine our system of government as the Russians interference in our elections. Particularly when they do it without presenting evidence of an impeachable offense.

Whatever level of interference occurred, it accomplished only one thing. That one thing is sowing the seeds of political discord. They succeeded and the Dems played right into their hands.

> To me the main reason Hillary lost because she ran
> a bad race
>
> Be honest
> What if the Russians were for for Hillary and she
> won - what would you be thinking?

Not much really. I was told from day one that she was a lock.

Bengazzzzzi Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> maxinewaters Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Maxine Waters asserted that the Russians came
> up
> > with the catchphrase "Crooked Hillary" in
> > coordination with the Trump campaign and this
> is
> > an impeachable offense. That was her best shot.
>
> > Who can top that?
>
>
> Impeaching Obama over his birth certificat

I'm not sure what that has to do with Russia?

.
Attachments:

Libtard conspiracy theorists Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> .


Why is Flynn pleading the 5th?

As for the speed of the investigation; Trump and the Trump administration have been trying to impede any Russian investigations. Such as the case of firing Comey the day before Comey was going to testify.

If you don't think Comey being fired the night before he was going to testify in the Russian investigation is odd, than you should be using white cane with a red tip every place you walk.

Fhnk Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Libtard conspiracy theorists Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > .
>
>
> Why is Flynn pleading the 5th?

Same reason Obama's IRS pleaded the 5th and Hillarys server tech refused to even show up.

If you can avoid the hassle of testifying just use the Obama methods.

Now Trump needs to use the Obama methods of surveilling BLM , Soros , the DNC , Obama , Hillary , Obama deep state holdovers and democrats in congress .

Fhnk Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Libtard conspiracy theorists Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > .
>
>
> Why is Flynn pleading the 5th?


Over shit he did that had nothing to do with the election or his job as NSA.

Brennan's testimony was very concise. He simply said "Trump administration had correspondence with the Russians during the election. What was discussed between Trump and Russians during the election is not known by the FBI. CIA and NSA would most likely have that information in their collecting databases."

"Russia did interfere with the US election. The goal was make US elections process look like a failure by elected Trump. Thus causing chaos and uncertainly in American markets and in world opinion of the US."

Obama said there was "no serious" person who would suggest it was possible to rig American elections, adding, "I'd invite Mr. Trump to stop whining and go try to make his case to get votes."

I knew Obama was a liar and now all libtards agree.

Just the Facts. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> As for the speed of the investigation; Trump and
> the Trump administration have been trying to
> impede any Russian investigations. Such as the
> case of firing Comey the day before Comey was
> going to testify.
>
> If you don't think Comey being fired the night
> before he was going to testify in the Russian
> investigation is odd, than you should be using
> white cane with a red tip every place you walk.


Here's the problem. The investigation began in July of 2016. It was the Obama administration that was in charge of it for 7 months. Trump has only been in for 4 months. They had almost twice as long to come up with something under the Obama administration (which clearly wanted to find something) and yet nothing turned up.

P C retards Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Fhnk Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Libtard conspiracy theorists Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > .
> >
> >
> > Why is Flynn pleading the 5th?
>
> Same reason Obama's IRS pleaded the 5th and
> Hillarys server tech refused to even show up.
>
> If you can avoid the hassle of testifying just use
> the Obama methods.
>
> Now Trump needs to use the Obama methods of
> surveilling BLM , Soros , the DNC , Obama ,
> Hillary , Obama deep state holdovers and democrats
> in congress .


He will, but he will do it legally like everything he does.

Americans are finally being represented.

one little problem Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Just the Facts. Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > As for the speed of the investigation; Trump
> and
> > the Trump administration have been trying to
> > impede any Russian investigations. Such as the
> > case of firing Comey the day before Comey was
> > going to testify.
> >
> > If you don't think Comey being fired the night
> > before he was going to testify in the Russian
> > investigation is odd, than you should be using
> > white cane with a red tip every place you walk.
>
>
> Here's the problem. The investigation began in
> July of 2016. It was the Obama administration
> that was in charge of it for 7 months. Trump has
> only been in for 4 months. They had almost twice
> as long to come up with something under the Obama
> administration (which clearly wanted to find
> something) and yet nothing turned up.

bama said there was "no serious" person who would suggest it was possible to rig American elections, adding, "I'd invite Mr. Trump to stop whining and go try to make his case to get votes."

P C retards Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Fhnk Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Libtard conspiracy theorists Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > .
> >
> >
> > Why is Flynn pleading the 5th?
>
> Same reason Obama's IRS pleaded the 5th and
> Hillarys server tech refused to even show up.
>
> If you can avoid the hassle of testifying just use
> the Obama methods.
>
> Now Trump needs to use the Obama methods of
> surveilling BLM , Soros , the DNC , Obama ,
> Hillary , Obama deep state holdovers and democrats
> in congress .


And what did trump and Flynn say about people takeing the 5th

Say what Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> P C retards Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Fhnk Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Libtard conspiracy theorists Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > .
> > >
> > >
> > > Why is Flynn pleading the 5th?
> >
> > Same reason Obama's IRS pleaded the 5th and
> > Hillarys server tech refused to even show up.
> >
> > If you can avoid the hassle of testifying just
> use
> > the Obama methods.
> >
> > Now Trump needs to use the Obama methods of
> > surveilling BLM , Soros , the DNC , Obama ,
> > Hillary , Obama deep state holdovers and
> democrats
> > in congress .
>
>
> And what did trump and Flynn say about people
> takeing the 5th


Obama said there was "no serious" person who would suggest it was possible to rig American elections, adding, "I'd invite Mr. Trump to stop whining and go try to make his case to get votes."

Say what Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> And what did trump and Flynn say about people
> takeing the 5th

I got this one!

Trump and Flynn said "Anybody who takes the 5th is hiding something!!!"

Throw Flynn in jail on contempt of court and lets see if he decides to talk then.

KKKillary KKKlinton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> one little problem Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Just the Facts. Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > As for the speed of the investigation; Trump
> > and
> > > the Trump administration have been trying to
> > > impede any Russian investigations. Such as
> the
> > > case of firing Comey the day before Comey was
> > > going to testify.
> > >
> > > If you don't think Comey being fired the
> night
> > > before he was going to testify in the Russian
> > > investigation is odd, than you should be
> using
> > > white cane with a red tip every place you
> walk.
> >
> >
> > Here's the problem. The investigation began in
> > July of 2016. It was the Obama administration
> > that was in charge of it for 7 months. Trump
> has
> > only been in for 4 months. They had almost
> twice
> > as long to come up with something under the
> Obama
> > administration (which clearly wanted to find
> > something) and yet nothing turned up.
>
> bama said there was "no serious" person who would
> suggest it was possible to rig American elections,
> adding, "I'd invite Mr. Trump to stop whining and
> go try to make his case to get votes."


Kkkilery you are a retard
This is what you wrote
"Obama already said before the election that there was no interference to US elections. Was he lying?"
Now you are trying to change what you said

So you were proven wrong, again.

,,,
Attachments:

Stay out of the deep end Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> KKKillary KKKlinton Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > one little problem Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Just the Facts. Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > As for the speed of the investigation;
> Trump
> > > and
> > > > the Trump administration have been trying
> to
> > > > impede any Russian investigations. Such as
> > the
> > > > case of firing Comey the day before Comey
> was
> > > > going to testify.
> > > >
> > > > If you don't think Comey being fired the
> > night
> > > > before he was going to testify in the
> Russian
> > > > investigation is odd, than you should be
> > using
> > > > white cane with a red tip every place you
> > walk.
> > >
> > >
> > > Here's the problem. The investigation began
> in
> > > July of 2016. It was the Obama
> administration
> > > that was in charge of it for 7 months. Trump
> > has
> > > only been in for 4 months. They had almost
> > twice
> > > as long to come up with something under the
> > Obama
> > > administration (which clearly wanted to find
> > > something) and yet nothing turned up.
> >
> > bama said there was "no serious" person who
> would
> > suggest it was possible to rig American
> elections,
> > adding, "I'd invite Mr. Trump to stop whining
> and
> > go try to make his case to get votes."
>
>
> Kkkilery you are a retard
> This is what you wrote
> "Obama already said before the election that there
> was no interference to US elections. Was he
> lying?"
> Now you are trying to change what you said
>
> So you were proven wrong, again.


Obama said there was "no serious" person who would suggest it was possible to rig American elections, adding, "I'd invite Mr. Trump to stop whining and go try to make his case to get votes."

Like usual, I'm right!

KKKillary KKKlinton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Stay out of the deep end Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > KKKillary KKKlinton Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > one little problem Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > Just the Facts. Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > As for the speed of the investigation;
> > Trump
> > > > and
> > > > > the Trump administration have been trying
> > to
> > > > > impede any Russian investigations. Such
> as
> > > the
> > > > > case of firing Comey the day before Comey
> > was
> > > > > going to testify.
> > > > >
> > > > > If you don't think Comey being fired the
> > > night
> > > > > before he was going to testify in the
> > Russian
> > > > > investigation is odd, than you should be
> > > using
> > > > > white cane with a red tip every place you
> > > walk.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Here's the problem. The investigation
> began
> > in
> > > > July of 2016. It was the Obama
> > administration
> > > > that was in charge of it for 7 months.
> Trump
> > > has
> > > > only been in for 4 months. They had almost
> > > twice
> > > > as long to come up with something under the
> > > Obama
> > > > administration (which clearly wanted to
> find
> > > > something) and yet nothing turned up.
> > >
> > > bama said there was "no serious" person who
> > would
> > > suggest it was possible to rig American
> > elections,
> > > adding, "I'd invite Mr. Trump to stop whining
> > and
> > > go try to make his case to get votes."
> >
> >
> > Kkkilery you are a retard
> > This is what you wrote
> > "Obama already said before the election that
> there
> > was no interference to US elections. Was he
> > lying?"
> > Now you are trying to change what you said
> >
> > So you were proven wrong, again.
>
>
> Obama said there was "no serious" person who would
> suggest it was possible to rig American elections,
> adding, "I'd invite Mr. Trump to stop whining and
> go try to make his case to get votes."


Why did you change the point of what your original post said?
Oh you are a liar and a retard

You really are retarded. I'm quoting Obama saying there was no interference with the election.

Obama said there was "no serious" person who would suggest it was possible to rig American elections, adding, "I'd invite Mr. Trump to stop whining and go try to make his case to get votes."

Libtards are clearly not serious people or Obama is a liar. I choose both.

KKKillary KKKlinton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You really are retarded. I'm quoting Obama saying
> there was no interference with the election.
>
> Obama said there was "no serious" person who would
> suggest it was possible to rig American elections,
> adding, "I'd invite Mr. Trump to stop whining and
> go try to make his case to get votes."


And you originally said
Obama already said before the election that there was no interference to US elections. Was he lying?

Now you are trying to say something different but acting like that is what you originally said

You are just a cum dumpster

Fhkl Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> KKKillary KKKlinton Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > You really are retarded. I'm quoting Obama
> saying
> > there was no interference with the election.
> >
> > Obama said there was "no serious" person who
> would
> > suggest it was possible to rig American
> elections,
> > adding, "I'd invite Mr. Trump to stop whining
> and
> > go try to make his case to get votes."
>
>
> And you originally said
> Obama already said before the election that there
> was no interference to US elections. Was he
> lying?
>
> Now you are trying to say something different but
> acting like that is what you originally said
>
> You are just a cum dumpster

And I was right. How are you unable to follow along?

Again....

Obama said there was "no serious" person who would suggest it was possible to rig American elections, adding, "I'd invite Mr. Trump to stop whining and go try to make his case to get votes."

KKKillary KKKlinton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Fhkl Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > KKKillary KKKlinton Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > You really are retarded. I'm quoting Obama
> > saying
> > > there was no interference with the election.
> > >
> > > Obama said there was "no serious" person who
> > would
> > > suggest it was possible to rig American
> > elections,
> > > adding, "I'd invite Mr. Trump to stop whining
> > and
> > > go try to make his case to get votes."
> >
> >
> > And you originally said
> > Obama already said before the election that
> there
> > was no interference to US elections. Was he
> > lying?
> >
> > Now you are trying to say something different
> but
> > acting like that is what you originally said
> >
> > You are just a cum dumpster
>
> And I was right. How are you unable to follow
> along?
>
> Again....
>
> Obama said there was "no serious" person who would
> suggest it was possible to rig American elections,
> adding, "I'd invite Mr. Trump to stop whining and
> go try to make his case to get votes."

Give it up
He busted you
You always lose when you try to play this game

Not getting paid for today Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> KKKillary KKKlinton Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Fhkl Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > KKKillary KKKlinton Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > You really are retarded. I'm quoting Obama
> > > saying
> > > > there was no interference with the
> election.
> > > >
> > > > Obama said there was "no serious" person
> who
> > > would
> > > > suggest it was possible to rig American
> > > elections,
> > > > adding, "I'd invite Mr. Trump to stop
> whining
> > > and
> > > > go try to make his case to get votes."
> > >
> > >
> > > And you originally said
> > > Obama already said before the election that
> > there
> > > was no interference to US elections. Was he
> > > lying?
> > >
> > > Now you are trying to say something different
> > but
> > > acting like that is what you originally said
> > >
> > > You are just a cum dumpster
> >
> > And I was right. How are you unable to follow
> > along?
> >
> > Again....
> >
> > Obama said there was "no serious" person who
> would
> > suggest it was possible to rig American
> elections,
> > adding, "I'd invite Mr. Trump to stop whining
> and
> > go try to make his case to get votes."
>
> Give it up
> He busted you
> You always lose when you try to play this game


Busted me? For quoting Obama telling Trump before the election that American elections cannot be tampered with, interfered with, hacked with or rigged?

Lololol!

So if Obama told Trump that American elections cannot be rigged, why are libtards blaming Russia for rigging the election?

Obama even said it can't evwn be suggested that American elections could be influenced in any way.

Lol!

Libtards!

KKKillary KKKlinton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Obama even said it can't evwn be suggested that
> American elections could be influenced in any
> way.
>
> Lol!
>
> Libtards!


So Obama said that...
Got a link?

KKKillary KKKlinton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Not getting paid for today Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > KKKillary KKKlinton Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Fhkl Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > KKKillary KKKlinton Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > You really are retarded. I'm quoting
> Obama
> > > > saying
> > > > > there was no interference with the
> > election.
> > > > >
> > > > > Obama said there was "no serious" person
> > who
> > > > would
> > > > > suggest it was possible to rig American
> > > > elections,
> > > > > adding, "I'd invite Mr. Trump to stop
> > whining
> > > > and
> > > > > go try to make his case to get votes."
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > And you originally said
> > > > Obama already said before the election that
> > > there
> > > > was no interference to US elections. Was he
> > > > lying?
> > > >
> > > > Now you are trying to say something
> different
> > > but
> > > > acting like that is what you originally
> said
> > > >
> > > > You are just a cum dumpster
> > >
> > > And I was right. How are you unable to follow
> > > along?
> > >
> > > Again....
> > >
> > > Obama said there was "no serious" person who
> > would
> > > suggest it was possible to rig American
> > elections,
> > > adding, "I'd invite Mr. Trump to stop whining
> > and
> > > go try to make his case to get votes."
> >
> > Give it up
> > He busted you
> > You always lose when you try to play this game
>
>
> Busted me? For quoting Obama telling Trump before
> the election that American elections cannot be
> tampered with, interfered with, hacked with or
> rigged?
>
> Lololol!


You got owned again
Lose and then change what you said is loser talk

Anyting Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> KKKillary KKKlinton Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Obama even said it can't evwn be suggested that
> > American elections could be influenced in any
> > way.
> >
> > Lol!
> >
> > Libtards!
>
>
> So Obama said that...
> Got a link?

Do you know how to use the internet? Doea your mom still pack your lunch?

KKKillary KKKlinton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Anyting Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > KKKillary KKKlinton Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Obama even said it can't evwn be suggested
> that
> > > American elections could be influenced in any
> > > way.
> > >
> > > Lol!
> > >
> > > Libtards!
> >
> >
> > So Obama said that...
> > Got a link?
>
> Do you know how to use the internet? Doea your mom
> still pack your lunch?


Stay stupid my friend

Impeaching Trump will make America great again.

Trump is a complete loser and a piece of shit.

Very funny how Trump's illegal worker mail order commie whore wife with the anchor baby slapped Trump's hand away when he tried to hold it. Twice!

You TrumpTards do know he/she/it Melania is a transvestite right?

Bottom line...

You lost.

Get over it.

Utlg Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ,,,


Flynn now has a special counsel hanging over his head. Killary's minions didn't have to worry about that. Obama's DOJ was providing overwatch for her and her campaign. She was so fucking crooked that with all the power of the federal government trying to protect her, she still fucked up that bad.

Flynn was fired three weeks into the Trump administration. Trump got rid of him. As soon as Trump found out about Manafort's communicating with the Roooshkies, he fired him. When Trump realized that Comey was keeping notes to try and blackmail him and that Comey was never going to pursue the leakers, he fired him.

D'OHnald is a Douche! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Impeaching Trump will make America great again.
>
> Trump is a complete loser and a piece of shit.
>
> Very funny how Trump's illegal worker mail order
> commie whore wife with the anchor baby slapped
> Trump's hand away when he tried to hold it.
> Twice!
>
> You TrumpTards do know he/she/it Melania is a
> transvestite right?


Your dripping butthurt makes me happy.

Yes, my comrade ypa!

Brennan:
"I encountered and am aware of information and intelligence that revealed contacts and interactions between Russian officials and US persons involved in the Trump campaign that I was concerned about because of known Russian efforts to suborn such individuals. It raised questions in my mind about whether Russia was able to gain the cooperation of those individuals."

Real Truther. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Brennan:
> "I encountered and am aware of information and
> intelligence that revealed contacts and
> interactions between Russian officials and US
> persons involved in the Trump campaign that I was
> concerned about because of known Russian efforts
> to suborn such individuals. It raised questions in
> my mind about whether Russia was able to gain the
> cooperation of those individuals."

Brennan should be embarrassed to admit that this is the basis of his concern. This is the very definition of a police state.

He basically said he has no fucking clue if there was anything illegal going on but damn it he was suspicious and therefore was going to spy and leak.

What a bastard. "US persons 'involved' in the Trump campaign." He was spying for no good reason. And he admits it. It is not illegal for a private citizen to have "interactions" with Russians.

e4vyp Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Real Truther. Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Brennan:
> > "I encountered and am aware of information and
> > intelligence that revealed contacts and
> > interactions between Russian officials and US
> > persons involved in the Trump campaign that I
> was
> > concerned about because of known Russian
> efforts
> > to suborn such individuals. It raised questions
> in
> > my mind about whether Russia was able to gain
> the
> > cooperation of those individuals."
>
> Brennan should be embarrassed to admit that this
> is the basis of his concern. This is the very
> definition of a police state.
>
> He basically said he has no fucking clue if there
> was anything illegal going on but damn it he was
> suspicious and therefore was going to spy and
> leak.
>
> What a bastard. "US persons 'involved' in the
> Trump campaign." He was spying for no good
> reason. And he admits it. It is not illegal for
> a private citizen to have "interactions" with
> Russians.

Give it up
It's sad
Please keep some dignity

First Trumptards were Trump and Russians, laughable. Nothing there.

Now it's, well Trump talked with the Russians and got help during the election but there's no real smoking yet or anything illegal that can be proven.

Tomorrow it will be Trump was sucking Putins cock and handing over US intelligence reports to the Russians but nothing illegal has been proven.

Trump is a Russian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> First Trumptards were Trump and Russians,
> laughable. Nothing there.

Still true.


> Now it's, well Trump talked with the Russians and
> got help during the election but there's no real
> smoking yet or anything illegal that can be
> proven.

Complete fabrication - not a single word of the above is actually true.


> Tomorrow it will be Trump was sucking Putins cock
> and handing over US intelligence reports to the
> Russians but nothing illegal has been proven.

Your fantasy not mine.

Brennan is a muslim convert and a Obama cuck, so is Comey. Clapper is a lapper for Obama, just like Loretta Lynch. Dirty fucking commies that hate America.

So let's take a look at one of the Washington Post's 30+ anti-Trump leads per day.

He says he does not know what the nature of these contacts were. Was just suspicious. Took it upon himself to start a government-wide spying and surveilling operation against Trump.

Is this really what we are paying the CIA to do?

Isn't more likely he just didn't like Trump? Isn't it more likely he was working with the Obama administration to sabotage Trump?
Attachments:

True the Vote! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Brennan is a muslim convert and a Obama cuck, so
> is Comey. Clapper is a lapper for Obama, just like
> Loretta Lynch. Dirty fucking commies that hate
> America.

really?

Meanwhile, the US has killed foreign leaders, and tried to influence/rig elections in other countries for over 60 years, and then we get outraged when other counties do the same to us?

The world saw what the US did in Iraq. We went in with our military, toppled the government, and captured their leader. Then we installed a sock puppet government, organized a kangaroo court, convicted their leader, and then hung him.

Now we get all pissed off when other countries try to influence our government and our elections? What has occurred so far is nothing compared to what will likely happen in the future.

Oh the irony... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Meanwhile, the US has killed foreign leaders, and
> tried to influence/rig elections in other
> countries for over 60 years, and then we get
> outraged when other counties do the same to us?
>
> The world saw what the US did in Iraq. We went in
> with our military, toppled the government, and
> captured their leader. Then we installed a sock
> puppet government, organized a kangaroo court,
> convicted their leader, and then hung him.
>
> Now we get all pissed off when other countries try
> to influence our government and our elections?
> What has occurred so far is nothing compared to
> what will likely happen in the future.

My favorite is all the US troops going door to door in Iraq taking away every-bodies guns because the US is afraid the guns could be used to over throw the "new government."

Can you imagine what would happen if US soldiers search houses in the US for guns and took them away???

The Russian investigation gets more interesting every day. Now we are learning that there was communications about the rigging the elections. WOW, I'm so surprised by the that...

You Can't Make This Up Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The Russian investigation gets more interesting
> every day. Now we are learning that there was
> communications about the rigging the elections.
> WOW, I'm so surprised by the that...


Really? I'm sure there are many of us that would love to see a link proving your claim.

FFXU Court Reporter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Brennan: "Clear evidence that Russia influenced US
> election so Trump could win."
>
> Goal of Russia was make the US election process
> look like a joke and make the US population doubt
> that the election process worked. Evidence exists
> but cannot be shared in an open hearing.

Russia didn't need to make the U.S. election process a joke. Everyone knows it's a joke already. Russia just wasting their time.

When Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> > Obama already said before the election that
> there
> > was no interference to US elections. Was he
> lying?
>
>
> When did he say that?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3CqV3R-39Vk

put up, or, well, you know Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You Can't Make This Up Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > The Russian investigation gets more interesting
> > every day. Now we are learning that there was
> > communications about the rigging the elections.
>
> > WOW, I'm so surprised by the that...
>
>
> Really? I'm sure there are many of us that would
> love to see a link proving your claim.

STFU! you are stupid to use google.

Trump is going to jail.

WHERE THE COMEY'S MEMOS????? I know he gave them Gerry to keep.

Awe poor Trumptards in full egg on face mode

FFXU Court Reporter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Brennan: "Clear evidence that Russia influenced US
> election so Trump could win."
>
> Goal of Russia was make the US election process
> look like a joke and make the US population doubt
> that the election process worked. Evidence exists
> but cannot be shared in an open hearing.


was 't nominating Hiliary Clinton and Donald Trump as the two candidates by the two main political parties more than sufficient evidence that both parties, and by extension there of, the entire election process in this country, had already turned into a joke?

The only joke susceptible to and accepting of a foreign attack are rightard traitors.

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The only joke susceptible to and accepting of a
> foreign attack are rightard traitors.

Honestly, the Clinton's and the Podesta's have made untold millions from direct financial ties to Russia. That's a fact.

Conservatives and republicans are handing USA over to the Russians and Trump is leading the giveaway.