HomeFairfax General ForumArrest/Ticket SearchWiki newPictures/VideosChatArticlesLinksAbout
Off-Topic :  Fairfax Underground fairfax underground logo
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Warren 'troubled' by $400000 Wall Street speaking fee for Obama
Posted by: Fox News ()
Date: April 27, 2017 05:04PM

https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2017/04/27/elizabeth-warren-says-she-troubled-wall-street-speaking-fee-for-obama/H4XczWw1yYMyMSAYAiGoyN/story.html







Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren gently criticized former president Barack Obama Thursday for his decision to accept $400,000 from a Wall Street firm to speak at a health care conference this fall.

Warren was asked about the controversy during an interview about her new book on the SiriusXM radio show, “Alter Family Politics.”


“I was troubled by that,” she said.

That was the extent of her comments aimed directly at Obama. She quickly launched into a broader discussion of her views of the corrupting influence of money in Washington.


“I describe it as a snake that slithers through Washington. And that it shows up in so many different ways here in Washington,” she said, referencing her just-published book, “This Fight Is Our Fight: The Battle to Save America’s Middle Class.”

“The influence of dollars on this place is what scares me,” she continued. “I think it ultimately threatens democracy.”

While Warren’s critique was a far cry from the withering criticism some on the left have leveled at Obama, it’s rougher than anything she said during the 2016 campaign about former secretary of state Hillary Clinton’s acceptance of hefty speaking fees from Wall Street firms.


Unlike Obama, Clinton was considering running for office when she gave her controversial speeches, while the former president’s days in elected public office are behind him.

Warren stayed neutral — and mostly silent — throughout the bitter primary contest between Clinton and Vermont independent Bernie Sanders, despite, as she writes in her book, coming under intense pressure from both sides to endorse her preferred candidate. “I didn’t want to undermine either of our candidates or to short-circuit any part of that debate,” she writes.

When Warren finally did endorse Clinton, after the New York Democrat had secured enough primary votes to clinch the nomination, the Globe asked whether Clinton should release the transcripts of paid speeches she gave to Goldman Sachs, an issue Sanders had hammered on the campaign trail.

“That’s for her to decide — there will be a whole lot of issues to talk about over the next several months,” Warren said.

In the SiriusXM interview, Warren said one of her reasons for writing the book is that she wanted to talk about how liberals can fight back against the money and power wielded by the rich and powerful.

“There are more of us than there are of them. And we’ve got to use our voices and our votes and fight back,” she said.

News leaked earlier this week that Obama had agreed to a $400,000 speaking gig, with the check being written by investment bank Cantor Fitzgerald. The decision to accept such a large payday from one of the very establishments of the “fat cat bankers” Obama derided in office sparked chatter in Washington. (The sum is also nearly twice as large as the fees commanded by former secretary of state Hillary Clinton when she spoke to Wall Street audiences.)

Obama’s spokesman Eric Schultz defended the former president in a statement Wednesday.

“With regard to this or any speech involving Wall Street sponsors, I’d just point out that in 2008, Barack Obama raised more money from Wall Street than any candidate in history — and still went on to successfully pass and implement the toughest reforms on Wall Street since FDR,” Schultz said.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Warren 'troubled' by $400000 Wall Street speaking fee for Obama
Posted by: Libtardz!!! LoLz!! ()
Date: April 27, 2017 05:17PM

Libtards eating their own. I'm lovin' it!

Libtardz!

Lolz!

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Warren 'troubled' by $400000 Wall Street speaking fee for Obama
Posted by: Pyr ()
Date: April 27, 2017 05:19PM

Libtardz!!! LoLz!! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Libtards eating their own. I'm lovin' it!
>
> Libtardz!
>
> Lolz!


How much are you paid to speak

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Warren 'troubled' by $400000 Wall Street speaking fee for Obama
Posted by: iknows u ()
Date: April 27, 2017 05:22PM

Libtardz!!! LoLz!! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Libtards eating their own. I'm lovin' it!
>
> Libtardz!
>
> Lolz!


you the guy who cleans up the auditorium after the speech and eats all the left overs, half eaten and abandoned refreshments? Take some home to family and save on a free meal?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Warren 'troubled' by $400000 Wall Street speaking fee for Obama
Posted by: Barney Smith Barney ()
Date: April 27, 2017 06:41PM

More proof Wall St has too much money. They may as well flush it down the toilet.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Warren 'troubled' by $400000 Wall Street speaking fee for Obama
Posted by: Mike O'Meara Show Fan ()
Date: April 27, 2017 07:18PM

Elizabeth Warren is a claiming to be Indian bitch. She just doesn't like a black man to be getting paid more than Clinton.

That's right, Elizabeth Warren hates niggers.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Warren 'troubled' by $400000 Wall Street speaking fee for Obama
Posted by: Warren Sap ()
Date: April 27, 2017 09:08PM

How does someone who has a law degree from Rutgers-Newark and virtually no actual legal experience end up being a full professor at Penn and Harvard in her 30s? What's more unethical? Being a former President taking an above board $400k speaking fee? Or lying about your Native American heritage to get jobs you weren't otherwise qualified for?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Warren 'troubled' by $400000 Wall Street speaking fee for Obama
Posted by: Fox News ()
Date: April 27, 2017 10:08PM

Warren Sap Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> How does someone who has a law degree from
> Rutgers-Newark and virtually no actual legal
> experience end up being a full professor at Penn
> and Harvard in her 30s? What's more unethical?
> Being a former President taking an above board
> $400k speaking fee? Or lying about your Native
> American heritage to get jobs you weren't
> otherwise qualified for?






Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 04/27/2017 10:09PM by Fox News.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Warren 'troubled' by $400000 Wall Street speaking fee for Obama
Posted by: Libtardz! LoLz! ()
Date: April 28, 2017 05:03PM

Libtardz!!! LoLz!! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Libtards eating their own. I'm lovin' it!
>
> Libtardz!
>
> Lolz!
Attachments:
goodfellows-laughing.gif

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Warren 'troubled' by $400000 Wall Street speaking fee for Obama
Posted by: warren is a square duck ()
Date: April 28, 2017 05:08PM

She said he sold out. I say if the money is there and the money is good, take it, go for the gusto. There is no such thing as "dirty money" money is inanimate and doesn't care and has no method to care. All money is good, it is the act that is dirty. Obama. if you got it, flaunt it baby.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Warren 'troubled' by $400000 Wall Street speaking fee for Obama
Posted by: Fake Injun Squaw ()
Date: April 28, 2017 05:12PM

She told us it was OK that Hillary took Wall Street money, now she gives a fuck?

She is a huge phony.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Warren 'troubled' by $400000 Wall Street speaking fee for Obama
Posted by: Ralph Pootawn ()
Date: April 28, 2017 05:19PM

She's mad because that's almost as much as she made last year.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Warren 'troubled' by $400000 Wall Street speaking fee for Obama
Posted by: Sell Out ()
Date: April 28, 2017 06:48PM

Obama, who is black, graduated from Harvard Law, edited the Harvard Law Review, yet was only an adjunct (aka per diem) professor at Harvard. Elizabeth Warren got a law degree from an extension campus of a public university, did 18-months of ad hoc legal work (trusts, wills, etc) and yet ends up as a tenured professor at both Penn and Harvard before the age of 40. I don't know if it's a "sell out" to lie about being Native Anerican to get preferential treatment, but it sure is shitty.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Warren 'troubled' by $400000 Wall Street speaking fee for Obama
Posted by: And Gerry Says? ()
Date: April 28, 2017 09:38PM

Nothing

Options: ReplyQuote


Your Name: 
Your Email (Optional): 
Subject: 
Attach a file
  • No file can be larger than 75 MB
  • All files together cannot be larger than 300 MB
  • 30 more file(s) can be attached to this message
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
       **  ********  ********   **      **        ** 
       **     **     **     **  **  **  **        ** 
       **     **     **     **  **  **  **        ** 
       **     **     ********   **  **  **        ** 
 **    **     **     **     **  **  **  **  **    ** 
 **    **     **     **     **  **  **  **  **    ** 
  ******      **     ********    ***  ***    ******  
This forum powered by Phorum.