I know this website is a lot of trolling and bullshit but we are getting ready to go to war with North Korea. Pray for our brave Military members as we will unleash a devastating assault of that brutal country North Korea.

Trump has to do something to Kim Jung Un! The little fat ass piece of shit keeps threatening the USA. This will define Donald J. Trump. A strong leader who helps liberate Korea. I hope we bomb the shit out of them. They have no Air Power compared to us. Our stealth fighter jets will succeed with minimal risk.

Trump critic 1 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Trump has to do something to Kim Jung Un! The
> little fat ass piece of shit keeps threatening the
> USA. This will define Donald J. Trump. A strong
> leader who helps liberate Korea. I hope we bomb
> the shit out of them. They have no Air Power
> compared to us. Our stealth fighter jets will
> succeed with minimal risk.

Invading or attacking North Korea is a complete cluster f idea. All North Korea ever does is send a couple missiles into the sea.

Plus Kim Jung Un is just crazy enough to launch an attack back and torpedo US aircraft carriers. Another area where Russia and China will defend with arms.

China and Russia have a shit of arms.

It's bill clintons fault. Put that draft dodger on the front lines.

Let's not forget what a mistake the last Korean conflict was with North Korea.

Fought from June 1950 to July 1953, the Korean War saw Communist North Korea invade its southern, democratic neighbor. Backed by the United Nations, with many of the troops furnished by the United States, South Korea resisted and fighting ebbed and flowed up and down the peninsula until the front stabilized just north of the 38th Parallel. A bitterly contested conflict, the Korean War saw the United States follow its policy of containment as it worked to block aggression and halt the spread of Communism. As such, the Korean War may be seen as one of the many proxy wars fought during the Cold War.

Forget about the Korean War back then. Our Military prowess is so much more advanced than everyone now. Trump has to respond now! He has no choice. We have been threatened. Kill Kim Jung Un right away with a GPS tomahawk missile and then see if they surrender and change their Government. USA,USA,USA,USA,USA.

They will be briefed that there are 20,000 North Korean artillery pieces that can destroy South Korea's capital Seoul in 48-72 hours.

Millions dead.

South Korea demolished.

China is on North Korea's side and has millions of men under arms.

The briefing will end with "Trump is a fucking idiot to start a war with North Korea and China because he will get his ass handed to him and millions will be killed."

Trump is a fucking moron.

I hope and pray we can liberate North Korea and have one prosperous Korea. Thanks

Stop, you fucking coward. They're gotten away with way too much. They're refining their deliver capabilities for nuclear arms. GET A FUCKING CLUE.

--------------


'North Korean torpedo' sank South's navy ship - report

20 May 2010

A North Korean submarine's torpedo sank a South Korean navy ship on 26 March causing the deaths of 46 sailors, an international report has found.

Investigators said they had discovered part of the torpedo on the sea floor and it carried lettering that matched a North Korean design.

Pyongyang rejected the claim as a "fabrication" and threatened war if sanctions were imposed, say reports.

China has urged both countries to show restraint.

South Korean President Lee Myung-bak pledged to take "stern action" against the North.

The White House described the sinking of the ship as an "act of aggression" by North Korea that challenged peace.

UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said the report was "deeply troubling".

Pyongyang said it would send its own inspection team to the South to "verify material evidence" behind the accusation.

NORTH KOREAN ATTACKS

Jan 1967 - attacks South Korean warship near border, killing 39 sailors
Jan 1968 - commandos storm presidential palace in Seoul in a failed attempt to kill President Park Chung-hee
Jan 1968 - captures USS Pueblo - one crew member dies and 82 held hostage for 11 months
Dec 1969 - hijacks South Korean airliner taking dozens of passengers hostage
Oct 1983 - bombs hotel in Rangoon, Burma in failed attempt to kill South Korean President Chun Doo-hwan - 21 people die
Nov 1987 - bombs South Korean airliner, killing 115
Sept 1996 - sub carrying 26 troops disabled off South - some land in South sparking deadly manhunt
Mar 2010 - torpedoes Cheonan warship, 46 sailors killed

How the ship was sunk

A North Korean defence spokesman said the country would "respond to reckless countermeasure with an all-out war of justice", the state KCNA news agency reported.

Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Ma Zhaoxu said Beijing had "noted" the report and would make its own assessment, but called on both sides to exercise restraint.

The Cheonan went down near the disputed inter-Korean maritime border, raising tension between the two nations, which technically remain at war.

The shattered wreck of the 1,200-tonne gunboat was later winched to the surface, in two pieces, for examination.

The investigation was led by experts from the US, Australia, Britain and Sweden. The team examined eyewitness accounts, damage to the vessel, evidence collected from the seabed and the injuries sustained by survivors and those who died.

It said: "The evidence points overwhelmingly to the conclusion that the torpedo was fired by a North Korean submarine.

"There is no other plausible explanation."

MORE:

http://www.bbc.com/news/10129703

Basic Linear Math Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> They will be briefed that there are 20,000 North
> Korean artillery pieces that can destroy South
> Korea's capital Seoul in 48-72 hours.
>
> Millions dead.
>
> South Korea demolished.
>
> China is on North Korea's side and has millions of
> men under arms.
>
> The briefing will end with "Trump is a fucking
> idiot to start a war with North Korea and China
> because he will get his ass handed to him and
> millions will be killed."
>
> Trump is a fucking moron.

So in typical Libtard fashion you are saying we should back down to this fat insane pussy who's only goal is to wipe out America? The pussy Obama already failed at that so now we need men to clean up his mess.

Libtarded Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Basic Linear Math Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > They will be briefed that there are 20,000
> North
> > Korean artillery pieces that can destroy South
> > Korea's capital Seoul in 48-72 hours.
> >
> > Millions dead.
> >
> > South Korea demolished.
> >
> > China is on North Korea's side and has millions
> of
> > men under arms.
> >
> > The briefing will end with "Trump is a fucking
> > idiot to start a war with North Korea and China
> > because he will get his ass handed to him and
> > millions will be killed."
> >
> > Trump is a fucking moron.
>
> So in typical Libtard fashion you are saying we
> should back down to this fat insane pussy who's
> only goal is to wipe out America? The pussy Obama
> already failed at that so now we need men to clean
> up his mess.

+1000

Harry N Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Forget about the Korean War back then. Our
> Military prowess is so much more advanced than
> everyone now. Trump has to respond now! He has no
> choice. We have been threatened. Kill Kim Jung Un
> right away with a GPS tomahawk missile and then
> see if they surrender and change their Government.
> USA,USA,USA,USA,USA.

That's exactly what we see about every war. Especially Vietnam.

North Korea has plenty of missiles they can launch from ships into the US also. China, North Korea and Russia all stick together.

.
Attachments:

China and North Korea Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Harry N Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Forget about the Korean War back then. Our
> > Military prowess is so much more advanced than
> > everyone now. Trump has to respond now! He has
> no
> > choice. We have been threatened. Kill Kim Jung
> Un
> > right away with a GPS tomahawk missile and then
> > see if they surrender and change their
> Government.
> > USA,USA,USA,USA,USA.
>
> That's exactly what we see about every war.
> Especially Vietnam.
>
> North Korea has plenty of missiles they can launch
> from ships into the US also. China, North Korea
> and Russia all stick together.

I agree, we should let that fat insane fuck in NK tell us what to do and look the other way why he builds up his arsenal and is able to strike the US like Obama did. This guy is reasonable as long as we just pamper/enable him and let him do whatever he wants. Deep inside he is a really good guy!

Bomb the shit out of the North Korean gooks. Fuck you Kim Jung Un. You will be gone soon God willing.

No good would ever come from attacking North Korea, and General Mattis and company knows it. North Korea is nothing more than a hermit republic with a waning system of government whose leadership is terrified of open revolt. They are only posturing and building up a nuclear arsenal to guarantee their existence. They aren't and never were going to use any nuclear capability they obtain in a first strike. If Trump wants to meet up with Kim jong un and have his hamburger, then that is fine, but igniting a conflict on the Korean penninsula is a bad idea all the way around. Leave them be, and time will deal with dictatorships the way it always does.

Hans Huckibein Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> No good would ever come from attacking North
> Korea, and General Mattis and company knows it.
> North Korea is nothing more than a hermit republic
> with a waning system of government whose
> leadership is terrified of open revolt. They are
> only posturing and building up a nuclear arsenal
> to guarantee their existence. They aren't and
> never were going to use any nuclear capability
> they obtain in a first strike. If Trump wants to
> meet up with Kim jong un and have his hamburger,
> then that is fine, but igniting a conflict on the
> Korean penninsula is a bad idea all the way
> around. Leave them be, and time will deal with
> dictatorships the way it always does.

+1 Well Said.

Hans Huckibein Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> No good would ever come from attacking North
> Korea, and General Mattis and company knows it.
> North Korea is nothing more than a hermit republic
> with a waning system of government whose
> leadership is terrified of open revolt. They are
> only posturing and building up a nuclear arsenal
> to guarantee their existence. They aren't and
> never were going to use any nuclear capability
> they obtain in a first strike. If Trump wants to
> meet up with Kim jong un and have his hamburger,
> then that is fine, but igniting a conflict on the
> Korean penninsula is a bad idea all the way
> around. Leave them be, and time will deal with
> dictatorships the way it always does.

We have to attack. They threatened us. Time to clean up a brutal dictatorship and the people of Korea. The majority of the people "probably 98 percent" want us to attack.

Nawwwwww, nothing about a war. They're just gonna' deport Hillary, Maddow, Colbert and Trevor Noah there.

Stui Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hans Huckibein Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > No good would ever come from attacking North
> > Korea, and General Mattis and company knows it.
> > North Korea is nothing more than a hermit
> republic
> > with a waning system of government whose
> > leadership is terrified of open revolt. They
> are
> > only posturing and building up a nuclear
> arsenal
> > to guarantee their existence. They aren't and
> > never were going to use any nuclear capability
> > they obtain in a first strike. If Trump wants
> to
> > meet up with Kim jong un and have his
> hamburger,
> > then that is fine, but igniting a conflict on
> the
> > Korean penninsula is a bad idea all the way
> > around. Leave them be, and time will deal with
> > dictatorships the way it always does.
>
> We have to attack. They threatened us. Time to
> clean up a brutal dictatorship and the people of
> Korea. The majority of the people "probably 98
> percent" want us to attack.


They have been making such threats since at least the late 90's. Even if they create the rockets necessary to strike the continental US, which is doubtful at this point they would never use it. They know they would be turned into a glass desert within a matter of minutes after launching such missiles. It's terrible what the people there go through, but the burden of overthrowing the dictatorship is not ours to bear. If Trump attacked North Korea because the "probably 98 percent" of Koreans wanted us to attack, that wouldn't be putting America first.

.
Attachments:

Are we prepared to go to war with North Korea and accept all the risks that entails?

Don't kid yourselves. It won't be pretty or easy for us. This won't be a matter of sending over a few cruise missles and dropping a few bombs. They have a large conventional army. Even if they don't have nukes they can hit the South Korean capital with artillery fired dirty bombs and Japan with rocket delivered dirty bombs. There will be large civilian casualties among our economic allies in east Asia and massive worldwide economic disruption, even if the North Koreans don't launch a major invasion of South Korea. We won't be able to end this war with the existing North Korean power structure in place, which means unless there is a coup by the army we are going to have to mobilize and send over large numbers of conventional forces to take and hold the country. All of this will cost billions of $$$. We cannot make the mistake of putting another war on the credit card. So that means higher taxes.

With this kind of commitment of U.S. resources and the risk too U.S. economic interests Trump HAS to go to Congress and get a war resolution. It doesn't have to be an actual declaration of war, but it would have to be a clear authorization that the President has the authority to use force. This by itself poses risks. It telegraphs our intentions allowing the North Koreans the chance to prepare, or even launch preemptive strikes. There is also the risk that if presented to Congress Trump won't get the needed support and we end up with North Korean mud as well as Syrian sand on our faces.

Bill.N. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Are we prepared to go to war with North Korea and
> accept all the risks that entails?
>
> Don't kid yourselves. It won't be pretty or easy
> for us. This won't be a matter of sending over a
> few cruise missles and dropping a few bombs. They
> have a large conventional army. Even if they
> don't have nukes they can hit the South Korean
> capital with artillery fired dirty bombs and Japan
> with rocket delivered dirty bombs. There will be
> large civilian casualties among our economic
> allies in east Asia and massive worldwide economic
> disruption, even if the North Koreans don't launch
> a major invasion of South Korea. We won't be able
> to end this war with the existing North Korean
> power structure in place, which means unless there
> is a coup by the army we are going to have to
> mobilize and send over large numbers of
> conventional forces to take and hold the country.
> All of this will cost billions of $$$. We cannot
> make the mistake of putting another war on the
> credit card. So that means higher taxes.
>
> With this kind of commitment of U.S. resources and
> the risk too U.S. economic interests Trump HAS to
> go to Congress and get a war resolution. It
> doesn't have to be an actual declaration of war,
> but it would have to be a clear authorization that
> the President has the authority to use force.
> This by itself poses risks. It telegraphs our
> intentions allowing the North Koreans the chance
> to prepare, or even launch preemptive strikes.
> There is also the risk that if presented to
> Congress Trump won't get the needed support and we
> end up with North Korean mud as well as Syrian
> sand on our faces.

Good sobering post
It will cost trillions
North Korea will invade the south

Trump got the approval from the Senate members to take military action if he chooses. Top General's are in favor of blowing North Korea up. I think it is long over due.

Stui Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Trump got the approval from the Senate members to
> take military action if he chooses. Top General's
> are in favor of blowing North Korea up. I think it
> is long over due.


You have no clue
Why would you make this up, really, why?

Kim Jung Un is the Anti Christ depicted in the Bible in Revalation. He is beyond evil to everyone in his way. He is a greed monger while over 75 percent are starving in his country. Needs to be put down for humanity. Please Trump make me like you. I didn't vote this election because I didn't like you or Hillary. Me being Korean American I hope you kill Kim Jung Un soon. God bless USA and Korea.

Tjbh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Kim Jung Un is the Anti Christ depicted in the
> Bible in Revalation. He is beyond evil to everyone
> in his way. He is a greed monger while over 75
> percent are starving in his country. Needs to be
> put down for humanity. Please Trump make me like
> you. I didn't vote this election because I didn't
> like you or Hillary. Me being Korean American I
> hope you kill Kim Jung Un soon. God bless USA and
> Korea.


We need pics first

Tjbh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Kim Jung Un is the Anti Christ depicted in the
> Bible in Revalation. He is beyond evil to everyone
> in his way. He is a greed monger while over 75
> percent are starving in his country. Needs to be
> put down for humanity. Please Trump make me like
> you. I didn't vote this election because I didn't
> like you or Hillary. Me being Korean American I
> hope you kill Kim Jung Un soon. God bless USA and
> Korea.

Are you willing to join the army and serve in combat infantry? If we are going to attack North Korea we won't need internet tough guy cheerleaders. We will need men and women willing to lace up their boots and walk through mined fields and villages while people are shooting at them.

Bill.N. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Are we prepared to go to war with North Korea and
> accept all the risks that entails?
>
> Don't kid yourselves. It won't be pretty or easy
> for us. This won't be a matter of sending over a
> few cruise missles and dropping a few bombs. They
> have a large conventional army. Even if they
> don't have nukes they can hit the South Korean
> capital with artillery fired dirty bombs and Japan
> with rocket delivered dirty bombs. There will be
> large civilian casualties among our economic
> allies in east Asia and massive worldwide economic
> disruption, even if the North Koreans don't launch
> a major invasion of South Korea. We won't be able
> to end this war with the existing North Korean
> power structure in place, which means unless there
> is a coup by the army we are going to have to
> mobilize and send over large numbers of
> conventional forces to take and hold the country.
> All of this will cost billions of $$$. We cannot
> make the mistake of putting another war on the
> credit card. So that means higher taxes.
>
> With this kind of commitment of U.S. resources and
> the risk too U.S. economic interests Trump HAS to
> go to Congress and get a war resolution. It
> doesn't have to be an actual declaration of war,
> but it would have to be a clear authorization that
> the President has the authority to use force.
> This by itself poses risks. It telegraphs our
> intentions allowing the North Koreans the chance
> to prepare, or even launch preemptive strikes.
> There is also the risk that if presented to
> Congress Trump won't get the needed support and we
> end up with North Korean mud as well as Syrian
> sand on our faces.

The president can act alone for 60 days. You know this.

The founders did not want war by committee. That is clear. Don't like it, too bad.

That is the kind of dim bulb thinking that will get the U.S. in trouble. What the war Powers Act says is irrelevant. Every president has maintained it is unconstitutional, the president controls the means to initiate fighting, and once the fighting starts the constitutional requirements become afterthoughts. Besides don't you control the House and the Senate?

The reason for seeking Congressional authorization isn't so the president can use military force. It is to insure we don't initiate a major war when our nation is deeply divided over whether to fight. It isn't just the pacifists on the left that could rise in opposition. It is also the isolationists on the right.

And FYI the Founders who drafted the Constitution did want war by Committee. The president is the commander in chief, but the Constitution said much more on the subject. A declaration of war to initiate fighting required the consent of both houses of Congress, and peace treaties ending the war require the consent of the Senate. Issues of raising equipping, paying for and governing those forces remain are the control of Congress even in times of war. The requirement for Congressional approval for government employees extends to officers of the U.S. regular forces, and the Constitution reserved to the states control over appointment of militia officers.