Off-Topic :
Fairfax Underground
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
HOW THE WHITE HOUSE AND REPUBLICANS BLEW UP THE HOUSE RUSSIA INVESTIGATION
Posted by:
Fox News
()
Date: March 29, 2017 07:19PM
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/how-the-white-house-and-republicans-blew-up-the-house-russia-investigation
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/politics/wp/2017/03/29/the-nunes-white-house-question-assessed-minute-by-minute/?utm_term=.31b966f214d9
The White House and Devin Nunes, the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, are pursuing a common strategy to deflect the investigation into the Russia scandal.
The evidence is now clear that the White House and Devin Nunes, the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, have worked together to halt what was previously billed as a sweeping investigation of Russian interference in last year’s election. “We’ve been frozen,” Jim Himes, a Democratic representative from Connecticut who is a member of the Committee, said.
The freeze started after last Monday’s hearing, where James Comey, the director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, revealed that the F.B.I. has been investigating possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia since last July. Comey also said that there was no evidence to support Trump’s tweets about being wiretapped.
Today, the House panel was scheduled to hear from three top officials who had served under the Obama Administration: Sally Yates, the former Deputy Attorney General, who briefly served as acting Attorney General, before being fired by President Trump; John Brennan, the former head of the C.I.A.; and James Clapper, the former director of national intelligence. But last week Nunes cancelled today’s hearing.
“The Monday hearing last week was, I’m sure, not to the White House’s liking,” said Himes. “Since Monday, I’m sorry to say, the chairman has ceased to be the chairman of an investigative committee and has been running interference for the Trump White House, cancelling hearings.”
Since then, Nunes and the White House have kicked up a cloud of peripheral issues that have distracted attention from Comey’s testimony and that of Michael Rogers, the director of the National Security Agency; Nunes and the Trump Administration have essentially shut down the investigation. Last night, Adam Schiff, the ranking Democrat on the Intelligence Committee, called for Nunes to recuse himself from the investigation. “All of this has cast such a cloud on the public perception of his impartiality that I think it would be in his interest as well as the committee’s,” he told me.
Since last Monday’s hearing, Nunes, who was a member of the Trump transition team, has spoken repeatedly about the issue of incidental collection, the intelligence community’s term for the communications of innocent Americans that can be swept up when the N.S.A. or other agencies legally spy on a foreign target. The Russian Ambassador, a legal target of surveillance, was recorded talking to Michael Flynn, Trump’s former national-security adviser, who was a victim of incidental collection.
The White House and Nunes were clearly coördinating this strategy. A few days before the hearing, Trump seemed to offer a preview of it. In an interview on Fox News, the President said that he “will be submitting things” to Nunes’s committee “very soon,” and “perhaps speaking about this next week,” adding that “you’re going to find some very interesting items coming to the forefront over the next two weeks.”
Last Monday morning, shortly before the start of the hearing, a senior White House official told me, “You’ll see the setting of the predicate. That’s the thing to watch today.” He suggested that I read a piece in The Hill about incidental collection. The article posited that if “Trump or his advisors were speaking directly to foreign individuals who were the target of U.S. spying during the election campaign, and the intelligence agencies recorded Trump by accident, it’s plausible that those communications would have been collected and shared amongst intelligence agencies.”
The White House clearly indicated to me that it knew Nunes would highlight this issue. “It’s backdoor surveillance where it’s not just incidental, it’s systematic,” the White House official said. “Watch Nunes today.”
Sure enough, at last Monday’s hearing, Nunes asked in his opening statement, “Were the communications of officials or associates of any campaign subject to any kind of improper surveillance?” He continued, “The Intelligence Community has extremely strict procedures for handling information pertaining to any U.S. citizens who are subject even to incidental surveillance, and this committee wants to insure all surveillance activities have followed all relevant laws, rules, and regulations.” Nunes made it clear that Trump’s wiretapping claim was false, but he seemed intent on offering the President a fig leaf for the explosive claim. “It’s still possible that other surveillance activities were used against President Trump and his associates,” he insisted. The overwhelming majority of questions from Republicans at the hearing revolved around this issue.
Last Tuesday evening, Nunes went to a secure National Security Council facility on the grounds of the White House and reviewed intelligence reports, with the assistance of one or more unknown officials. (Michael Isikoff, of Yahoo News, reports that one of the officials may have been Michael Ellis, a former Nunes staffer who now works at the White House. When asked by reporters today, Nunes declined to confirm or deny the report.) The following morning, without informing any other members of the House Intelligence Committee about what he had learned, Nunes went back to the White House and briefed the President on those reports. He held press conferences, one at the Capitol and one outside the West Wing, before and after his meeting with Trump.
Last Friday, Nunes announced that he was cancelling the scheduled hearing with Yates, Brennan, and Clapper. The trio of Obama officials, who have said little in public about the Russia investigation, would have made for a riveting day of testimony. In late January, Yates informed the Trump White House that Michael Flynn, Trump’s national-security adviser at the time, misled his superiors about his contacts with Russian officials and therefore might be a target of blackmail attempts. On January 30th, she instructed Department of Justice lawyers not to defend Trump’s original travel ban, and Trump fired her. Brennan had helped to oversee the Obama Administration’s report about Russia’s interference in the Presidential campaign. As for Clapper, he contradicted Trump’s infamous false claim that Trump Tower was wiretapped by President Obama, saying, on “Meet the Press,” “For the part of the national-security apparatus that I oversaw as D.N.I., there was no such wiretap activity mounted against the President-elect at the time, or as a candidate, or against his campaign.”
This morning, the Washington Post reported that, last week, just before Nunes cancelled the hearing at which Yates was scheduled to testify, Trump Administration lawyers tried to block her appearance. “Any blocking of anyone or anything simply stokes suspicion of what the Administration might be hiding,” Himes told me in response to the Post report. Sean Spicer, Trump’s press secretary, said in a statement, “The White House has taken no action to prevent Sally Yates from testifying and the Department of Justice specifically told her that it would not stop her.” (The Post posted correspondence between Yates’s attorney and the Administration that seems to contradict Spicer’s claim.)
Nunes said that he instead wanted Comey and Rogers to return to brief the Intelligence Committee in a closed setting. But that hearing hasn’t happened, either. When members return to Washington, usually on Mondays, the committee holds a so-called “hot spots” briefing at 5 p.m. about committee business, but, according to Himes, that briefing didn’t take place yesterday.
“We’re all still mystified. We get back on Monday and no information has been shared with Democrats, Republicans, staff,” Himes said. He added that calling for Comey and Rogers to return “was a very transparent effort to prevent Brennan and Clapper and the Deputy Attorney General from testifying.” He said that, since the bombshell claims by Comey and Rogers, “everything has been about muddying the waters and stopping us from proceeding.”
Last night, Schiff, who had been cautiously optimistic about Nunes’s ability to conduct a fair investigation and more restrained in his criticism of Nunes than Himes and other Democrats, told me, “There does seem to have been a sense of urgency after the Monday hearing to do something. Whether this was the White House feeling the need to rebut what the directors had said during the open hearing, when they completely repudiated him, I don’t know.”
In a bit of political jiu-jitsu, Schiff, in addition to calling on Nunes to recuse himself from the Russia investigation, also said that Nunes could not be trusted to examine the broader issue of incidental collection. “Since he was a key part of that transition team, I don’t see how he can reasonably expect to lead an investigation into whether proper minimization procedures were being followed that might impact him personally,” Schiff told me.
Despite his many public appearances and interviews over the last week, Nunes’s spokesman told me he was unavailable for an interview. Asked about Schiff’s demands, the Nunes spokesman, Jack Langer, said, “He’s not recusing. It’s all just politics.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/politics/wp/2017/03/29/the-nunes-white-house-question-assessed-minute-by-minute/?utm_term=.31b966f214d9
The White House and Devin Nunes, the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, are pursuing a common strategy to deflect the investigation into the Russia scandal.
The evidence is now clear that the White House and Devin Nunes, the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, have worked together to halt what was previously billed as a sweeping investigation of Russian interference in last year’s election. “We’ve been frozen,” Jim Himes, a Democratic representative from Connecticut who is a member of the Committee, said.
The freeze started after last Monday’s hearing, where James Comey, the director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, revealed that the F.B.I. has been investigating possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia since last July. Comey also said that there was no evidence to support Trump’s tweets about being wiretapped.
Today, the House panel was scheduled to hear from three top officials who had served under the Obama Administration: Sally Yates, the former Deputy Attorney General, who briefly served as acting Attorney General, before being fired by President Trump; John Brennan, the former head of the C.I.A.; and James Clapper, the former director of national intelligence. But last week Nunes cancelled today’s hearing.
“The Monday hearing last week was, I’m sure, not to the White House’s liking,” said Himes. “Since Monday, I’m sorry to say, the chairman has ceased to be the chairman of an investigative committee and has been running interference for the Trump White House, cancelling hearings.”
Since then, Nunes and the White House have kicked up a cloud of peripheral issues that have distracted attention from Comey’s testimony and that of Michael Rogers, the director of the National Security Agency; Nunes and the Trump Administration have essentially shut down the investigation. Last night, Adam Schiff, the ranking Democrat on the Intelligence Committee, called for Nunes to recuse himself from the investigation. “All of this has cast such a cloud on the public perception of his impartiality that I think it would be in his interest as well as the committee’s,” he told me.
Since last Monday’s hearing, Nunes, who was a member of the Trump transition team, has spoken repeatedly about the issue of incidental collection, the intelligence community’s term for the communications of innocent Americans that can be swept up when the N.S.A. or other agencies legally spy on a foreign target. The Russian Ambassador, a legal target of surveillance, was recorded talking to Michael Flynn, Trump’s former national-security adviser, who was a victim of incidental collection.
The White House and Nunes were clearly coördinating this strategy. A few days before the hearing, Trump seemed to offer a preview of it. In an interview on Fox News, the President said that he “will be submitting things” to Nunes’s committee “very soon,” and “perhaps speaking about this next week,” adding that “you’re going to find some very interesting items coming to the forefront over the next two weeks.”
Last Monday morning, shortly before the start of the hearing, a senior White House official told me, “You’ll see the setting of the predicate. That’s the thing to watch today.” He suggested that I read a piece in The Hill about incidental collection. The article posited that if “Trump or his advisors were speaking directly to foreign individuals who were the target of U.S. spying during the election campaign, and the intelligence agencies recorded Trump by accident, it’s plausible that those communications would have been collected and shared amongst intelligence agencies.”
The White House clearly indicated to me that it knew Nunes would highlight this issue. “It’s backdoor surveillance where it’s not just incidental, it’s systematic,” the White House official said. “Watch Nunes today.”
Sure enough, at last Monday’s hearing, Nunes asked in his opening statement, “Were the communications of officials or associates of any campaign subject to any kind of improper surveillance?” He continued, “The Intelligence Community has extremely strict procedures for handling information pertaining to any U.S. citizens who are subject even to incidental surveillance, and this committee wants to insure all surveillance activities have followed all relevant laws, rules, and regulations.” Nunes made it clear that Trump’s wiretapping claim was false, but he seemed intent on offering the President a fig leaf for the explosive claim. “It’s still possible that other surveillance activities were used against President Trump and his associates,” he insisted. The overwhelming majority of questions from Republicans at the hearing revolved around this issue.
Last Tuesday evening, Nunes went to a secure National Security Council facility on the grounds of the White House and reviewed intelligence reports, with the assistance of one or more unknown officials. (Michael Isikoff, of Yahoo News, reports that one of the officials may have been Michael Ellis, a former Nunes staffer who now works at the White House. When asked by reporters today, Nunes declined to confirm or deny the report.) The following morning, without informing any other members of the House Intelligence Committee about what he had learned, Nunes went back to the White House and briefed the President on those reports. He held press conferences, one at the Capitol and one outside the West Wing, before and after his meeting with Trump.
Last Friday, Nunes announced that he was cancelling the scheduled hearing with Yates, Brennan, and Clapper. The trio of Obama officials, who have said little in public about the Russia investigation, would have made for a riveting day of testimony. In late January, Yates informed the Trump White House that Michael Flynn, Trump’s national-security adviser at the time, misled his superiors about his contacts with Russian officials and therefore might be a target of blackmail attempts. On January 30th, she instructed Department of Justice lawyers not to defend Trump’s original travel ban, and Trump fired her. Brennan had helped to oversee the Obama Administration’s report about Russia’s interference in the Presidential campaign. As for Clapper, he contradicted Trump’s infamous false claim that Trump Tower was wiretapped by President Obama, saying, on “Meet the Press,” “For the part of the national-security apparatus that I oversaw as D.N.I., there was no such wiretap activity mounted against the President-elect at the time, or as a candidate, or against his campaign.”
This morning, the Washington Post reported that, last week, just before Nunes cancelled the hearing at which Yates was scheduled to testify, Trump Administration lawyers tried to block her appearance. “Any blocking of anyone or anything simply stokes suspicion of what the Administration might be hiding,” Himes told me in response to the Post report. Sean Spicer, Trump’s press secretary, said in a statement, “The White House has taken no action to prevent Sally Yates from testifying and the Department of Justice specifically told her that it would not stop her.” (The Post posted correspondence between Yates’s attorney and the Administration that seems to contradict Spicer’s claim.)
Nunes said that he instead wanted Comey and Rogers to return to brief the Intelligence Committee in a closed setting. But that hearing hasn’t happened, either. When members return to Washington, usually on Mondays, the committee holds a so-called “hot spots” briefing at 5 p.m. about committee business, but, according to Himes, that briefing didn’t take place yesterday.
“We’re all still mystified. We get back on Monday and no information has been shared with Democrats, Republicans, staff,” Himes said. He added that calling for Comey and Rogers to return “was a very transparent effort to prevent Brennan and Clapper and the Deputy Attorney General from testifying.” He said that, since the bombshell claims by Comey and Rogers, “everything has been about muddying the waters and stopping us from proceeding.”
Last night, Schiff, who had been cautiously optimistic about Nunes’s ability to conduct a fair investigation and more restrained in his criticism of Nunes than Himes and other Democrats, told me, “There does seem to have been a sense of urgency after the Monday hearing to do something. Whether this was the White House feeling the need to rebut what the directors had said during the open hearing, when they completely repudiated him, I don’t know.”
In a bit of political jiu-jitsu, Schiff, in addition to calling on Nunes to recuse himself from the Russia investigation, also said that Nunes could not be trusted to examine the broader issue of incidental collection. “Since he was a key part of that transition team, I don’t see how he can reasonably expect to lead an investigation into whether proper minimization procedures were being followed that might impact him personally,” Schiff told me.
Despite his many public appearances and interviews over the last week, Nunes’s spokesman told me he was unavailable for an interview. Asked about Schiff’s demands, the Nunes spokesman, Jack Langer, said, “He’s not recusing. It’s all just politics.”
Re: HOW THE WHITE HOUSE AND REPUBLICANS BLEW UP THE HOUSE RUSSIA INVESTIGATION
Posted by:
The Real Reporter
()
Date: March 29, 2017 09:57PM
I have very carefully read these two stories. I have found absolutely no new information or anything useful. Just vague criticisms of Trump admin and Nunes. Accusations of "muddying the waters" but no details.
Interestingly no on seems to be denying that the Obama spooks did in fact use targeted and systematic foreign "surveillance" of non-Russian targets to spy on Republicans. If they were doing it to Trump doesn't it make you wonder who else they have been spying on?
Interestingly no on seems to be denying that the Obama spooks did in fact use targeted and systematic foreign "surveillance" of non-Russian targets to spy on Republicans. If they were doing it to Trump doesn't it make you wonder who else they have been spying on?
Re: HOW THE WHITE HOUSE AND REPUBLICANS BLEW UP THE HOUSE RUSSIA INVESTIGATION
Posted by:
Gerrymanderer2
()
Date: March 29, 2017 10:05PM
We are witnessing a blatant attempt at a cover up. But this is a national security issue with profound ramifications. It's something you can't cover up and that won't go away.
Re: HOW THE WHITE HOUSE AND REPUBLICANS BLEW UP THE HOUSE RUSSIA INVESTIGATION
Posted by:
this is outrageous
()
Date: March 29, 2017 10:31PM
when loretta lynch met slick willy on the tarmac that was just about grandkids
but when an actual gov't official meets with president trump its auto a coverup
ravi the rapist logic folks
gtfo out of our country, goatfucker
but when an actual gov't official meets with president trump its auto a coverup
ravi the rapist logic folks
gtfo out of our country, goatfucker
Re: HOW THE WHITE HOUSE AND REPUBLICANS BLEW UP THE HOUSE RUSSIA INVESTIGATION
Posted by:
Gerrymanderer2
()
Date: March 29, 2017 10:37PM
Loretta didn't meet with anyone. Billy boy boarded her plane for a very short period of time.
Loretta Lynch recused herself anyway. Your Attorney General lied about meeting the Russian Ambassador at his nomination hearing. He should be in jail.
Nunes will not reveal his source, will not tell WTF he's talking about, is shutting down hearings and will not recuse himself even though he was on the Trump transition team.
He won't even tell us who let him onto the White House grounds, information that is supposed to be made public.
And the funny thing is. YOU'RE FUCKING TALKING. YOU'VE GOT SOME SHIT TO SAY. That's the funny thing.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/29/2017 10:38PM by Gerrymanderer2.
Loretta Lynch recused herself anyway. Your Attorney General lied about meeting the Russian Ambassador at his nomination hearing. He should be in jail.
Nunes will not reveal his source, will not tell WTF he's talking about, is shutting down hearings and will not recuse himself even though he was on the Trump transition team.
He won't even tell us who let him onto the White House grounds, information that is supposed to be made public.
And the funny thing is. YOU'RE FUCKING TALKING. YOU'VE GOT SOME SHIT TO SAY. That's the funny thing.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/29/2017 10:38PM by Gerrymanderer2.
Re: HOW THE WHITE HOUSE AND REPUBLICANS BLEW UP THE HOUSE RUSSIA INVESTIGATION
Posted by:
nkDk7
()
Date: March 29, 2017 10:39PM
loretta lynch did not recuse herself you lying sack of shit
fuck a goat
fuck a goat
Re: HOW THE WHITE HOUSE AND REPUBLICANS BLEW UP THE HOUSE RUSSIA INVESTIGATION
Posted by:
Gerrymanderer2
()
Date: March 29, 2017 10:40PM
Yeah she did you dumb fuck. That's why Comey's dumb ass had free reign to fuck the election a week before the vote.
Re: HOW THE WHITE HOUSE AND REPUBLICANS BLEW UP THE HOUSE RUSSIA INVESTIGATION
Posted by:
Gerrymanderer2
()
Date: March 29, 2017 10:41PM
You can't be that uninformed. You gotta be garbage? Are you acting like garbage? Don't be garbage you filthy disgusting rat bastard rightard scum bag. lol
Re: HOW THE WHITE HOUSE AND REPUBLICANS BLEW UP THE HOUSE RUSSIA INVESTIGATION
Posted by:
pd9XM
()
Date: March 29, 2017 10:41PM
your little marxist fantasy isn't coming true
Re: HOW THE WHITE HOUSE AND REPUBLICANS BLEW UP THE HOUSE RUSSIA INVESTIGATION
Posted by:
questionsss
()
Date: March 29, 2017 10:42PM
does gerry's brainwashing come directly from goat semen or from the imbreeding?
Re: HOW THE WHITE HOUSE AND REPUBLICANS BLEW UP THE HOUSE RUSSIA INVESTIGATION
Posted by:
Gerrymanderer2
()
Date: March 29, 2017 10:43PM
There is no fantasy, unlike Trumptard land. Some Americans still deal in facts. That's why we are not susceptible to con artists from New York.
Re: HOW THE WHITE HOUSE AND REPUBLICANS BLEW UP THE HOUSE RUSSIA INVESTIGATION
Posted by:
vp3nL
()
Date: March 29, 2017 10:46PM
Gerry, just admit it you smell like curry BO
your hated here, get out
you will be gassed
your hated here, get out
you will be gassed
Re: HOW THE WHITE HOUSE AND REPUBLICANS BLEW UP THE HOUSE RUSSIA INVESTIGATION
Posted by:
Ravi's war
()
Date: March 29, 2017 10:46PM
meaninglesspoll.jpg
Re: HOW THE WHITE HOUSE AND REPUBLICANS BLEW UP THE HOUSE RUSSIA INVESTIGATION
Posted by:
hahaha gerrym
()
Date: March 29, 2017 10:47PM
Gerry/Ravi has a fanboy and he's losing his mind lol.
Re: HOW THE WHITE HOUSE AND REPUBLICANS BLEW UP THE HOUSE RUSSIA INVESTIGATION
Posted by:
Trump and Putin
()
Date: March 29, 2017 11:54PM
This is what Nixon started doing. Trying to shutdown investigations into White House activities.
Trump's problem is he can't throw 20 lawyers on the case and tie it up in paperwork like he does in the business world. The FBI and committees are going to continue to find out what Trump was doing with the Russians and Putin.
Trump's problem is he can't throw 20 lawyers on the case and tie it up in paperwork like he does in the business world. The FBI and committees are going to continue to find out what Trump was doing with the Russians and Putin.
Re: HOW THE WHITE HOUSE AND REPUBLICANS BLEW UP THE HOUSE RUSSIA INVESTIGATION
Posted by:
Libtard conspiracies
()
Date: March 29, 2017 11:58PM
Trump and Putin Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> This is what Nixon started doing. Trying to
> shutdown investigations into White House
> activities.
>
> Trump's problem is he can't throw 20 lawyers on
> the case and tie it up in paperwork like he does
> in the business world. The FBI and committees are
> going to continue to find out what Trump was doing
> with the Russians and Putin.
Attachments:
-------------------------------------------------------
> This is what Nixon started doing. Trying to
> shutdown investigations into White House
> activities.
>
> Trump's problem is he can't throw 20 lawyers on
> the case and tie it up in paperwork like he does
> in the business world. The FBI and committees are
> going to continue to find out what Trump was doing
> with the Russians and Putin.
Attachments:
Re: HOW THE WHITE HOUSE AND REPUBLICANS BLEW UP THE HOUSE RUSSIA INVESTIGATION
Posted by:
How Far
()
Date: March 30, 2017 12:00AM
We already know the investigation has credible information on collusion. That has been announced. The question is how far did the collusion go?
Re: HOW THE WHITE HOUSE AND REPUBLICANS BLEW UP THE HOUSE RUSSIA INVESTIGATION
Posted by:
DXF6G
()
Date: March 30, 2017 11:58AM
How Far Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> We already know the investigation has credible
> information on collusion.
No. We do not know that. Everyone that has looked at the "evidence" so far basically said there is no evidence of collusion. Other than the moonbat from California who looks like Meade's brother.
> That has been announced.
No. It has not been announced. Fake News stories alleging "connections" is not anything more than conspiracy theory. Think about it. If there was one scintilla of evidence you think it wouldn't have been leaked already? Of course it would have. Since there is not a leak of actual evidence that speaks volumes.
> The question is how far did the collusion go?
Nowhere. Since there was no collusion.
I feel sorry for the people who watch CNN and MSNBC. They actually believe that crap.
-------------------------------------------------------
> We already know the investigation has credible
> information on collusion.
No. We do not know that. Everyone that has looked at the "evidence" so far basically said there is no evidence of collusion. Other than the moonbat from California who looks like Meade's brother.
> That has been announced.
No. It has not been announced. Fake News stories alleging "connections" is not anything more than conspiracy theory. Think about it. If there was one scintilla of evidence you think it wouldn't have been leaked already? Of course it would have. Since there is not a leak of actual evidence that speaks volumes.
> The question is how far did the collusion go?
Nowhere. Since there was no collusion.
I feel sorry for the people who watch CNN and MSNBC. They actually believe that crap.
Re: HOW THE WHITE HOUSE AND REPUBLICANS BLEW UP THE HOUSE RUSSIA INVESTIGATION
Posted by:
ebpVY
()
Date: March 30, 2017 12:00PM
colluding to do what? hack the voting machines? trump paid russian hackers to hack clintons emails and give them to wikileaks so we could what a crook she is?
what exactly is the implication?
what exactly is the implication?
Re: HOW THE WHITE HOUSE AND REPUBLICANS BLEW UP THE HOUSE RUSSIA INVESTIGATION
Posted by:
KKKillary KKKlinton.
()
Date: March 30, 2017 02:57PM
Ok, ok, I admit it. There were Russians in the voting booth with me. They told me if I didn't vote for Trump they were going to stop killing muslims. I had no choice.
Re: HOW THE WHITE HOUSE AND REPUBLICANS BLEW UP THE HOUSE RUSSIA INVESTIGATION
Posted by:
Affect effect ....
()
Date: March 30, 2017 03:09PM
I like how trumpers keep changing it to hacking the voteing machines
Both republicans and democrats agree that the Russians tried to effect the outcome of the election
Is what it is
Both republicans and democrats agree that the Russians tried to effect the outcome of the election
Is what it is
Re: HOW THE WHITE HOUSE AND REPUBLICANS BLEW UP THE HOUSE RUSSIA INVESTIGATION
Posted by:
exposing the criminals
()
Date: March 30, 2017 03:23PM
Affect effect .... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I like how trumpers keep changing it to hacking
> the voteing machines
>
> Both republicans and democrats agree that the
> Russians tried to effect the outcome of the
> election
>
> Is what it is
You mean like releasing emails of all the shady shit shillary and podesta where doing. LMAO, yeah that's a real crime...exposing the real criminals of the Clinton mafia.
You fucking dumbass libturds are beyond despicable liars.
-------------------------------------------------------
> I like how trumpers keep changing it to hacking
> the voteing machines
>
> Both republicans and democrats agree that the
> Russians tried to effect the outcome of the
> election
>
> Is what it is
You mean like releasing emails of all the shady shit shillary and podesta where doing. LMAO, yeah that's a real crime...exposing the real criminals of the Clinton mafia.
You fucking dumbass libturds are beyond despicable liars.
Re: HOW THE WHITE HOUSE AND REPUBLICANS BLEW UP THE HOUSE RUSSIA INVESTIGATION
Posted by:
KKKillary KKKlinton.
()
Date: March 30, 2017 03:28PM
exposing the criminals Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Affect effect .... Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I like how trumpers keep changing it to hacking
> > the voteing machines
> >
> > Both republicans and democrats agree that the
> > Russians tried to effect the outcome of the
> > election
> >
> > Is what it is
>
> You mean like releasing emails of all the shady
> shit shillary and podesta where doing. LMAO, yeah
> that's a real crime...exposing the real criminals
> of the Clinton mafia.
>
> You fucking dumbass libturds are beyond despicable
> liars.
Podesta fell for a phishing scam, that's not hacking. His email password was PASSWORD, lol!
Releasing emails that belong to the American citizens is NOT HACKING!
Why do libs hate the USA?
-------------------------------------------------------
> Affect effect .... Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I like how trumpers keep changing it to hacking
> > the voteing machines
> >
> > Both republicans and democrats agree that the
> > Russians tried to effect the outcome of the
> > election
> >
> > Is what it is
>
> You mean like releasing emails of all the shady
> shit shillary and podesta where doing. LMAO, yeah
> that's a real crime...exposing the real criminals
> of the Clinton mafia.
>
> You fucking dumbass libturds are beyond despicable
> liars.
Podesta fell for a phishing scam, that's not hacking. His email password was PASSWORD, lol!
Releasing emails that belong to the American citizens is NOT HACKING!
Why do libs hate the USA?
Re: HOW THE WHITE HOUSE AND REPUBLICANS BLEW UP THE HOUSE RUSSIA INVESTIGATION
Posted by:
Knicks
()
Date: March 30, 2017 03:28PM
exposing the criminals Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Affect effect .... Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I like how trumpers keep changing it to hacking
> > the voteing machines
> >
> > Both republicans and democrats agree that the
> > Russians tried to effect the outcome of the
> > election
> >
> > Is what it is
>
> You mean like releasing emails of all the shady
> shit shillary and podesta where doing. LMAO, yeah
> that's a real crime...exposing the real criminals
> of the Clinton mafia.
>
> You fucking dumbass libturds are beyond despicable
> liars.
Trump is president
Once again trumpets try and change the subject
-------------------------------------------------------
> Affect effect .... Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I like how trumpers keep changing it to hacking
> > the voteing machines
> >
> > Both republicans and democrats agree that the
> > Russians tried to effect the outcome of the
> > election
> >
> > Is what it is
>
> You mean like releasing emails of all the shady
> shit shillary and podesta where doing. LMAO, yeah
> that's a real crime...exposing the real criminals
> of the Clinton mafia.
>
> You fucking dumbass libturds are beyond despicable
> liars.
Trump is president
Once again trumpets try and change the subject
Re: HOW THE WHITE HOUSE AND REPUBLICANS BLEW UP THE HOUSE RUSSIA INVESTIGATION
Posted by:
Tool says what
()
Date: March 30, 2017 03:33PM
Knicks Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> exposing the criminals Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Affect effect .... Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > I like how trumpers keep changing it to
> hacking
> > > the voteing machines
> > >
> > > Both republicans and democrats agree that the
> > > Russians tried to effect the outcome of the
> > > election
> > >
> > > Is what it is
> >
> > You mean like releasing emails of all the shady
> > shit shillary and podesta where doing. LMAO,
> yeah
> > that's a real crime...exposing the real
> criminals
> > of the Clinton mafia.
> >
> > You fucking dumbass libturds are beyond
> despicable
> > liars.
>
>
> Trump is president
> Once again trumpets try and change the subject
Once again libturds hide from the fact that your candidate was a treasonous criminal and stole the democratic nomination from Sanders. America's news media should have exposed her for her crimes but nooooo, they were in the bag for her.
Yes, thank God Trump is President.
MAGA
-------------------------------------------------------
> exposing the criminals Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Affect effect .... Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > I like how trumpers keep changing it to
> hacking
> > > the voteing machines
> > >
> > > Both republicans and democrats agree that the
> > > Russians tried to effect the outcome of the
> > > election
> > >
> > > Is what it is
> >
> > You mean like releasing emails of all the shady
> > shit shillary and podesta where doing. LMAO,
> yeah
> > that's a real crime...exposing the real
> criminals
> > of the Clinton mafia.
> >
> > You fucking dumbass libturds are beyond
> despicable
> > liars.
>
>
> Trump is president
> Once again trumpets try and change the subject
Once again libturds hide from the fact that your candidate was a treasonous criminal and stole the democratic nomination from Sanders. America's news media should have exposed her for her crimes but nooooo, they were in the bag for her.
Yes, thank God Trump is President.
MAGA