Off-Topic :
Fairfax Underground
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
"the wisdom of the wise will perish, the intelligence of the intelligent will vanish."
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
how many children could you beat up?
Posted by:
Mr. Misery
()
Date: October 03, 2009 04:49PM
How many children do you think you could take in a fight? I mean one on one, one after the other, like Diggstown. How many before you started to get winded and let your guard drop? The children would range from 5 to 10 years old, and being children of course, they fight dirty. It's really a question of endurance.
I think I could beat up around fifty, maybe.
I think I could beat up around fifty, maybe.
Re: how many children could you beat up?
Posted by:
Kenny_Powers
()
Date: October 03, 2009 05:01PM
sir you stole this bit from ron and fez, and it was originally named "how many 9 year olds could you beat up".
if you have 45 mins to kill, WATCH THESE! its the fucking funniest radio ive ever heard
there are 4 more parts that i didnt post
if you have 45 mins to kill, WATCH THESE! its the fucking funniest radio ive ever heard
there are 4 more parts that i didnt post
Re: how many children could you beat up?
Posted by:
Harry Tuttle
()
Date: October 03, 2009 05:04PM
One on One would be a lot easier than if they attacked in a swarm.
In a swarm, the little bastards would latch on to your legs, jump on your back, hang on your neck. Sure, you'd be able to swat down the first few waves, but they would relentlessly attack... 20-30 of the little fuckheads climbing up you, using your shirt as a rope, whilst kicking your junk... Then remember they have long, jagged, dirty nails that would be scratching you. Some of them would be coughing on you... They just have to get you to trip once and you're not coming back up. Hopefully, you would crush several of their still-forming heads on the pavement during your fall...
If it was one on one, I think I could go all day, 8am-8pm. If I got hungry I'd eat the flesh of my fallen enemies. Even if I did get winded, and let my guard drop a few times, it's not like they're going to knock your lights out.
In a swarm, the little bastards would latch on to your legs, jump on your back, hang on your neck. Sure, you'd be able to swat down the first few waves, but they would relentlessly attack... 20-30 of the little fuckheads climbing up you, using your shirt as a rope, whilst kicking your junk... Then remember they have long, jagged, dirty nails that would be scratching you. Some of them would be coughing on you... They just have to get you to trip once and you're not coming back up. Hopefully, you would crush several of their still-forming heads on the pavement during your fall...
If it was one on one, I think I could go all day, 8am-8pm. If I got hungry I'd eat the flesh of my fallen enemies. Even if I did get winded, and let my guard drop a few times, it's not like they're going to knock your lights out.
Re: how many children could you beat up?
Posted by:
ThePackLeader
()
Date: October 03, 2009 05:11PM
Harry Tuttle Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> One on One would be a lot easier than if they
> attacked in a swarm.
>
> In a swarm, the little bastards would latch on to
> your legs, jump on your back, hang on your neck.
> Sure, you'd be able to swat down the first few
> waves, but they would relentlessly attack... 20-30
> of the little fuckheads climbing up you, using
> your shirt as a rope, whilst kicking your junk...
> Then remember they have long, jagged, dirty nails
> that would be scratching you. Some of them would
> be coughing on you... They just have to get you to
> trip once and you're not coming back up.
> Hopefully, you would crush several of their
> still-forming heads on the pavement during your
> fall...
>
> If it was one on one, I think I could go all day,
> 8am-8pm. If I got hungry I'd eat the flesh of my
> fallen enemies. Even if I did get winded, and let
> my guard drop a few times, it's not like they're
> going to knock your lights out.
LOL
I'd just unleash my dogs on them. With the price of Dog Food now-a-days, a little free Kibbles'n Bits never hurts.
-------------------------------------------------------
> One on One would be a lot easier than if they
> attacked in a swarm.
>
> In a swarm, the little bastards would latch on to
> your legs, jump on your back, hang on your neck.
> Sure, you'd be able to swat down the first few
> waves, but they would relentlessly attack... 20-30
> of the little fuckheads climbing up you, using
> your shirt as a rope, whilst kicking your junk...
> Then remember they have long, jagged, dirty nails
> that would be scratching you. Some of them would
> be coughing on you... They just have to get you to
> trip once and you're not coming back up.
> Hopefully, you would crush several of their
> still-forming heads on the pavement during your
> fall...
>
> If it was one on one, I think I could go all day,
> 8am-8pm. If I got hungry I'd eat the flesh of my
> fallen enemies. Even if I did get winded, and let
> my guard drop a few times, it's not like they're
> going to knock your lights out.
LOL
I'd just unleash my dogs on them. With the price of Dog Food now-a-days, a little free Kibbles'n Bits never hurts.
Re: how many children could you beat up?
Posted by:
Gravis
()
Date: October 03, 2009 06:21PM
"the wisdom of the wise will perish, the intelligence of the intelligent will vanish."
Re: how many children could you beat up?
Posted by:
Czar
()
Date: October 03, 2009 10:43PM
Harry Tuttle Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> One on One would be a lot easier than if they
> attacked in a swarm.
>
> In a swarm, the little bastards would latch on to
> your legs, jump on your back, hang on your neck.
> Sure, you'd be able to swat down the first few
> waves, but they would relentlessly attack... 20-30
> of the little fuckheads climbing up you, using
> your shirt as a rope, whilst kicking your junk...
> Then remember they have long, jagged, dirty nails
> that would be scratching you. Some of them would
> be coughing on you... They just have to get you to
> trip once and you're not coming back up.
> Hopefully, you would crush several of their
> still-forming heads on the pavement during your
> fall...
>
> If it was one on one, I think I could go all day,
> 8am-8pm. If I got hungry I'd eat the flesh of my
> fallen enemies. Even if I did get winded, and let
> my guard drop a few times, it's not like they're
> going to knock your lights out.
lol
-------------------------------------------------------
> One on One would be a lot easier than if they
> attacked in a swarm.
>
> In a swarm, the little bastards would latch on to
> your legs, jump on your back, hang on your neck.
> Sure, you'd be able to swat down the first few
> waves, but they would relentlessly attack... 20-30
> of the little fuckheads climbing up you, using
> your shirt as a rope, whilst kicking your junk...
> Then remember they have long, jagged, dirty nails
> that would be scratching you. Some of them would
> be coughing on you... They just have to get you to
> trip once and you're not coming back up.
> Hopefully, you would crush several of their
> still-forming heads on the pavement during your
> fall...
>
> If it was one on one, I think I could go all day,
> 8am-8pm. If I got hungry I'd eat the flesh of my
> fallen enemies. Even if I did get winded, and let
> my guard drop a few times, it's not like they're
> going to knock your lights out.
lol
Re: how many children could you beat up?
Posted by:
ThePackLeader
()
Date: October 03, 2009 10:57PM
Gravis Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
Lol, how could I forget that scene!? Hilarious!
-------------------------------------------------------
>
Lol, how could I forget that scene!? Hilarious!
Re: how many children could you beat up?
Posted by:
Kenny_Powers
()
Date: October 05, 2009 06:21AM
"if the kids are coming out 1 every minute thats easy. BAM! smash the first kid in the face, sit down for 55 seconds and smoke a cigar, next kid comes out, I put the cigar out on his face... theres going to be a pile of children" - Ron Bennington
Re: how many children could you beat up?
Posted by:
Warhawk
()
Date: October 05, 2009 06:44AM
Mr. Misery Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> How many children do you think you could take in a
> fight?
A shitload.
__________________________________
That's not a ladybug, that's a cannapiller.
-------------------------------------------------------
> How many children do you think you could take in a
> fight?
A shitload.
__________________________________
That's not a ladybug, that's a cannapiller.
Re: how many children could you beat up?
Posted by:
ferfux
()
Date: October 07, 2009 04:22PM
I dont think I could bring myself to harm any children. Unless they were Zombie children and I was trapped on Never Land Ranch. Ah-HEE HEE! Sham -ON! (exits Moonwalking)
Re: how many children could you beat up?
Posted by:
496
()
Date: October 07, 2009 04:29PM
I would like to beat up all of Jon and Kate's kids. Actually, I meant I'd like to beat up Jon and Kate.
Re: how many children could you beat up?
Posted by:
§
()
Date: October 07, 2009 04:45PM
Jon and Kate's kids look strange. I think if I had to fight them, I would give up because I fell over laughing at their fugliness.
Re: how many children could you beat up?
Posted by:
yresiM .rM
()
Date: July 23, 2011 01:21AM
Mr. Misery Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> How many children do you think you could take in a
> fight? I mean one on one, one after the other,
> like Diggstown. How many before you started to get
> winded and let your guard drop? The children would
> range from 5 to 10 years old, and being children
> of course, they fight dirty. It's really a
> question of endurance.
>
> I think I could beat up around fifty, maybe.
27
-------------------------------------------------------
> How many children do you think you could take in a
> fight? I mean one on one, one after the other,
> like Diggstown. How many before you started to get
> winded and let your guard drop? The children would
> range from 5 to 10 years old, and being children
> of course, they fight dirty. It's really a
> question of endurance.
>
> I think I could beat up around fifty, maybe.
27
Re: how many children could you beat up?
Posted by:
Traveler
()
Date: July 23, 2011 08:29AM
Harry Tuttle Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> One on One would be a lot easier than if they
> attacked in a swarm.
Look out for the kiddies in Rome - swarm over ya and - presto! - you're instantly a lot lighter.
And poorer.
-------------------------------------------------------
> One on One would be a lot easier than if they
> attacked in a swarm.
Look out for the kiddies in Rome - swarm over ya and - presto! - you're instantly a lot lighter.
And poorer.
Re: how many children could you beat up?
Posted by:
friskydingo
()
Date: October 31, 2011 08:08PM
Your old stuff was better mister misery
Re: how many children could you beat up?
Posted by:
poopstick
()
Date: October 31, 2011 11:22PM
50?
I think I could easily do at least 200.
Assuming you start squared off in a ready to fight position, you could just do the same move on them over and over... 1 kick to the chest to knock em down, 1 stomp on neck to keep em down... rinse, repeat.
I think I could easily do at least 200.
Assuming you start squared off in a ready to fight position, you could just do the same move on them over and over... 1 kick to the chest to knock em down, 1 stomp on neck to keep em down... rinse, repeat.
Re: how many children could you beat up?
Posted by:
Mr. Orgasm bump
()
Date: November 13, 2011 02:39PM
Mr. Orgasm bump
Re: how many children could you beat up?
Posted by:
cbtkP
()
Date: October 02, 2015 07:37AM
Mr. Misery Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> How many children do you think you could take in a
> fight? I mean one on one, one after the other,
> like Diggstown. How many before you started to get
> winded and let your guard drop? The children would
> range from 5 to 10 years old, and being children
> of course, they fight dirty. It's really a
> question of endurance.
>
> I think I could beat up around fifty, maybe.
Willam Moreno could beat up 50 children.
-------------------------------------------------------
> How many children do you think you could take in a
> fight? I mean one on one, one after the other,
> like Diggstown. How many before you started to get
> winded and let your guard drop? The children would
> range from 5 to 10 years old, and being children
> of course, they fight dirty. It's really a
> question of endurance.
>
> I think I could beat up around fifty, maybe.
Willam Moreno could beat up 50 children.
Re: how many children could you beat up?
Posted by:
why hurt children?
()
Date: October 02, 2015 03:36PM
Why hurt kids? Just run away. Do you find shame in running away from a child?
Re: how many children could you beat up?
Posted by:
what's up with that?
()
Date: October 02, 2015 03:51PM
I thought in one of Miz's earlier posts he said he looked a little like a young Sean Connery?
Re: how many children could you beat up?
Posted by:
poopstick
()
Date: October 02, 2015 03:53PM
Haven't been on here in years and it's still the same old tired posts
Re: how many children could you beat up?
Posted by:
djrit
()
Date: October 02, 2015 04:13PM
poopstick Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Haven't been on here in years and it's still the
> same old tired posts
Well known Mr Misery fan and former head cheerleader^^^^^^^
-------------------------------------------------------
> Haven't been on here in years and it's still the
> same old tired posts
Well known Mr Misery fan and former head cheerleader^^^^^^^
Re: how many children could you beat up?
Posted by:
chEnk
()
Date: October 02, 2015 04:31PM
poopstick Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Haven't been on here in years and it's still the
> same old tired posts
You've been away for a while but since you've been gone Misery has been completely disgraced. All of his supporters have since left. His house got swatted, his family has been publicly shamed. Misery's online activity has ruined his life offline.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Haven't been on here in years and it's still the
> same old tired posts
You've been away for a while but since you've been gone Misery has been completely disgraced. All of his supporters have since left. His house got swatted, his family has been publicly shamed. Misery's online activity has ruined his life offline.
Re: how many children could you beat up?
Posted by:
good luck anyways
()
Date: October 02, 2015 05:17PM
poopstick Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Haven't been on here in years and it's still the
> same old tired posts
The old Alias, Misery, Tuttle, Bloody Blisters, Dingo, WTL, Provalone clique has pretty much dispersed or fled in embarrisment. You can try but I doubt you can reunite them again.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Haven't been on here in years and it's still the
> same old tired posts
The old Alias, Misery, Tuttle, Bloody Blisters, Dingo, WTL, Provalone clique has pretty much dispersed or fled in embarrisment. You can try but I doubt you can reunite them again.
Re: how many children could you beat up?
Posted by:
poopstick
()
Date: October 08, 2015 02:00PM
Wow, now that's some pretty good drama there
Re: how many children could you beat up?
Posted by:
young sean connery!!!!
()
Date: December 20, 2015 05:21PM
what's up with that? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I thought in one of Miz's earlier posts he said he
> looked a little like a young Sean Connery?
Young Jabba the Hutt!
I really think eesh and miz should be sumo wrestlers.
-------------------------------------------------------
> I thought in one of Miz's earlier posts he said he
> looked a little like a young Sean Connery?
Young Jabba the Hutt!
I really think eesh and miz should be sumo wrestlers.
Re: how many children could you beat up?
Posted by:
dlerjma
()
Date: December 20, 2015 05:27PM
In poor sections of Mexico there exist gangs of young boys (maybe 12 years old) referred to as "piranas", they attack a small man in mass and coordination and strip him of everything which they attempt to sell. Not unusual to attack a drunk and leave him totally naked. The guy attempt to fight back but they are too many.
Re: how many children could you beat up?
Posted by:
Silalry Clit
()
Date: December 21, 2015 01:27PM
20-25 one at a time, 8 all at once
Re: how many children could you beat up?
Posted by:
ch99p
()
Date: March 11, 2017 08:19PM
ch99p
Re: how many children could you beat up?
Posted by:
man with many inches to his dick
()
Date: October 30, 2017 12:51AM
Mr. Misery Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> How many children do you think you could take in a
> fight? I mean one on one, one after the other,
> like Diggstown. How many before you started to get
> winded and let your guard drop? The children would
> range from 5 to 10 years old, and being children
> of course, they fight dirty. It's really a
> question of endurance.
>
> I think I could beat up around fifty, maybe.
-------------------------------------------------------
> How many children do you think you could take in a
> fight? I mean one on one, one after the other,
> like Diggstown. How many before you started to get
> winded and let your guard drop? The children would
> range from 5 to 10 years old, and being children
> of course, they fight dirty. It's really a
> question of endurance.
>
> I think I could beat up around fifty, maybe.
Re: how many children could you beat up?
Posted by:
Michael cutts pedo fan
()
Date: August 21, 2020 12:03AM
friskydingo Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Your old stuff was better mister misery
-------------------------------------------------------
> Your old stuff was better mister misery